Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 24, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2283021330
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ying, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ying, J.

Hypothesis Testing III: Counts and Medians1

Kimberly E. Applegate, MD, MS, Richard Tello, MD, MSME, MPH and Jun Ying, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (K.E.A.); Department of Radiology, Boston University, 88 E Newton St, Atrium 2, Boston, MA 02118 (R.T.); and Departments of Radiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (J.Y.). Received October 16, 2002; revision requested February 18, 2003; final revision received March 13; accepted April 1. Address correspondence to R.T. (e-mail: tello@alum.mit.edu).



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Mann-Whitney U test result for continuous data (fluorocholine uptake over 5.5 [percentage dose per organ] in human kidneys), P = .06. We retain the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the medians, and we conclude that the fluorocholine renal uptake in men and women is similar at the .05 significance level (the marginal P value suggests a trend toward a significant difference). If we had incorrectly used the t test, we would have concluded the opposite: P = .02.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.