DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2283021557
Stroke: Effect of Implementing an Evaluation and Treatment Protocol Compliant with NINDS Recommendations1
James E. Stahl, MD, CM, MPH,
Karen L. Furie, MD,
Suzanne Gleason, PhD and
G. Scott Gazelle, MD, MPH, PhD
1 From the Institute for Technology Assessment (J.E.S.) and Departments of Radiology (J.E.S., G.S.G.), Medicine (J.E.S.), and Neurology (K.L.F.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Zero Emerson Bldg, Suite 2H, Boston, MA 02114; and Department of Economics, Trinity College, Hartford, Conn (S.G.). Received November 25, 2002; revision requested February 4, 2003; revision received March 31; accepted April 10. Supported in part by the U.S. Department of the Army with DAMD 17-99-2-9001. Address correspondence to J.E.S. (e-mail: james@mgh-ita.org).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Flowchart shows timing of events in current practice and in proposed NINDS recommendation-compliant strategy. * = start of in-hospital evaluation and management, ED = emergency department, EMS = emergency medical services, EP = emergency medicine physician.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Flowchart shows stroke evaluation and management model. CAT Scan = CT scanning, N = no, Y = yes.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Graph shows average QALYs (for 10,000 patients presenting with stroke symptoms) versus number of patients competing for CT per day.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Graph shows time from emergency arrival to treatment for patients with stroke versus number of patients competing for CT per day.
|
|
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.