HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duijm, L. E. M. Articles by de Koning, H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duijm, L. E. M. Articles by de Koning, H. J.

Independent Double Reading of Screening Mammograms in the Netherlands: Effect of Arbitration Following Reader Disagreements¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands (L.E.M.D.); Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (J.H.G., H.J.d.K.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.H.C.L.H.). Received April 27, 2003; revision requested July 8; final revision received September 26; accepted October 21. Address correspondence to L.E.M.D. (e-mail: LEMDuijm@hotmail.com).

View larger version (37K): [in a new window]   Results of 65,779 mammographic screening examinations performed between July 1, 1998, and January 1, 2001. det. ca. = detected cancers.