Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 29, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2323030830
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shellock, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Crues, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shellock, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Crues, J. V.

MR Procedures: Biologic Effects, Safety, and Patient Care1

Frank G. Shellock, PhD and John V. Crues, MD

1 From the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California; and Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education, and Research, 7511 McConnell Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90045 (F.G.S.); and Radnet Management, Los Angeles, Calif (J.V.C.). Received May 21, 2003; revision requested July 18; revision received August 8; accepted October 8. Address correspondence to F.G.S. (e-mail: frank.shellock@gte.net).



View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Example of an MR procedure screening form for patients. (Reprinted, with permission, from the Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education, and Research.)

 


View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Example of a screening form for individuals who must enter an MR environment. (Reprinted, with permission, from the Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education, and Research.)

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Examples of aneurysm clips with a variety of shapes and sizes (different versions of Spetzler Titanium Aneurysm Clips; Healthcare Corporation, V. Mueller Neuro/Spine, San Carlos, Calif). Aneurysm clips may be made from various materials, including ferromagnetic and nonmagnetic metals.

 


View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Transverse T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (repetition time, 500 msec; echo time, 20 msec) of the brain obtained at 1.5 T in a patient with nonferromagnetic aneurysm clips. Note the presence of relatively small signal void artifacts (arrowheads) associated with these implants.

 


View larger version (129K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5a. Examples of (a) an intravascular filter (Recovery Nitinol Filter; Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Ariz) and (b) stents (Endomed, Phoenix, Ariz) that have undergone MR safety testing.

 


View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5b. Examples of (a) an intravascular filter (Recovery Nitinol Filter; Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Ariz) and (b) stents (Endomed, Phoenix, Ariz) that have undergone MR safety testing.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.