Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 27, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2331031463

(Radiology 2004;233:281.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.

Coronary Artery Calcification: Effect of Size of Field of View on Multi–Detector Row CT Measurements1

Cheng Hong, MD, PhD, Thomas K. Pilgram, PhD, Fang Zhu, MD, PhD and Kyongtae T. Bae, MD, PhD

1 From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8131, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110. Received September 10, 2003; revision requested November 20; revision received December 18; accepted January 30, 2004. Address correspondence to K.T.B. (e-mail: baet@mir.wustl.edu).



View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1a. Transverse multi-detector row CT images for coronary artery calcium screening reconstructed with (a) 210-mm, (b) 260-mm, and (c) 310-mm FOV in 54-year-old man show the same level of the heart and calcified lesions (arrowheads) in the coronary arteries. Although the 210-mm FOV appears to include too much of the lung region and could have been reduced to cover only the heart at this level, the heart occupies a larger cross-sectional area of the CT images at more inferior levels. The use of smaller FOVs may not completely cover the heart at inferior levels.

 


View larger version (88K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1b. Transverse multi-detector row CT images for coronary artery calcium screening reconstructed with (a) 210-mm, (b) 260-mm, and (c) 310-mm FOV in 54-year-old man show the same level of the heart and calcified lesions (arrowheads) in the coronary arteries. Although the 210-mm FOV appears to include too much of the lung region and could have been reduced to cover only the heart at this level, the heart occupies a larger cross-sectional area of the CT images at more inferior levels. The use of smaller FOVs may not completely cover the heart at inferior levels.

 


View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1c. Transverse multi-detector row CT images for coronary artery calcium screening reconstructed with (a) 210-mm, (b) 260-mm, and (c) 310-mm FOV in 54-year-old man show the same level of the heart and calcified lesions (arrowheads) in the coronary arteries. Although the 210-mm FOV appears to include too much of the lung region and could have been reduced to cover only the heart at this level, the heart occupies a larger cross-sectional area of the CT images at more inferior levels. The use of smaller FOVs may not completely cover the heart at inferior levels.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph shows difference in calcium scores of individual subjects between different FOVs (in millimeters). Note that the calcium score at the second FOV is subtracted from the calcium score at the first.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.