Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342032017
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sherbondy, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Napel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sherbondy, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Napel, S.

Alternative Input Devices for Efficient Navigation of Large CT Angiography Data Sets1

Anthony J. Sherbondy, MS, Djamila Holmlund, BS, Geoffrey D. Rubin, MD, Pamela K. Schraedley, PhD, Terry Winograd, PhD and Sandy Napel, PhD

1 From the Radiology 3D Laboratory, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 318 Campus Dr, Rm S323, Stanford, CA 94305-5450. From the 2002 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received December 15, 2003; revision requested February 23, 2004; revision received April 30; accepted May 24. Supported by the National Institutes of Health 1R01HL67194, the Lucas Foundation, the Packard Foundation, the Phil N. Allen Trust, and the Wallenberg Foundation. Address correspondence to A.J.S. (e-mail: sherbond@stanford.edu).



View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Navigation devices used in this study. Clockwise from upper left: Graphire pen tablet (Wacom Technology, Vancouver, Wash), trackball (Macally, Irwindale, Calif), ShuttlePro jog-shuttle wheel (Contour Design, Windham, NH), and ScrollPoint mouse (IBM, White Plains, NY).

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. Thin-slab maximum intensity projections from the CT angiography data set obtained in the patient with advanced peripheral vascular disease show two of the 25 anatomic targets used in this study. (a) Thirty-voxel-thick anteroposterior view centered on origin of right anterior tibial artery (three-section extent). (b) Eighty-eight-voxel-thick view midway between anteroposterior and left-right views centered on point of left superficial femoral artery occlusion (four-section extent). Note that readers were asked to find anatomic targets by navigating through transverse image stacks and did not see these or any other type of processed views. The vascular targets are circled in yellow, and the range of acceptable transverse sections is located between the red lines.

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. Thin-slab maximum intensity projections from the CT angiography data set obtained in the patient with advanced peripheral vascular disease show two of the 25 anatomic targets used in this study. (a) Thirty-voxel-thick anteroposterior view centered on origin of right anterior tibial artery (three-section extent). (b) Eighty-eight-voxel-thick view midway between anteroposterior and left-right views centered on point of left superficial femoral artery occlusion (four-section extent). Note that readers were asked to find anatomic targets by navigating through transverse image stacks and did not see these or any other type of processed views. The vascular targets are circled in yellow, and the range of acceptable transverse sections is located between the red lines.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. Location of artificial target in secondary experiment. (a) Front view of 3D target. The polyhedron has a central triangular section with a base of 2 cm and a height of 1.2 cm (display dimensions), and the smaller triangles linearly interpolate to zero in 20 sections on either side of the central triangle. (b) Side view of 3D target (showing every other section). (c, d) Images from abdominal CT angiography data set show target (white triangle in c, red triangle in d) embedded near center of images.

 


View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. Location of artificial target in secondary experiment. (a) Front view of 3D target. The polyhedron has a central triangular section with a base of 2 cm and a height of 1.2 cm (display dimensions), and the smaller triangles linearly interpolate to zero in 20 sections on either side of the central triangle. (b) Side view of 3D target (showing every other section). (c, d) Images from abdominal CT angiography data set show target (white triangle in c, red triangle in d) embedded near center of images.

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3c. Location of artificial target in secondary experiment. (a) Front view of 3D target. The polyhedron has a central triangular section with a base of 2 cm and a height of 1.2 cm (display dimensions), and the smaller triangles linearly interpolate to zero in 20 sections on either side of the central triangle. (b) Side view of 3D target (showing every other section). (c, d) Images from abdominal CT angiography data set show target (white triangle in c, red triangle in d) embedded near center of images.

 


View larger version (85K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3d. Location of artificial target in secondary experiment. (a) Front view of 3D target. The polyhedron has a central triangular section with a base of 2 cm and a height of 1.2 cm (display dimensions), and the smaller triangles linearly interpolate to zero in 20 sections on either side of the central triangle. (b) Side view of 3D target (showing every other section). (c, d) Images from abdominal CT angiography data set show target (white triangle in c, red triangle in d) embedded near center of images.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.