Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 15, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2353040473
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beinfeld, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gazelle, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beinfeld, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gazelle, G. S.

Diagnostic Imaging Costs: Are They Driving Up the Costs of Hospital Care?1

Molly T. Beinfeld, MPH and G. Scott Gazelle, MD, MPH, PhD

1 From the Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114-4724 (M.T.B., G.S.G.); and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (G.S.G.). From the 2002 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received March 11, 2004; revision requested May 21; revision received July 19; accepted August 18. Address correspondence to G.S.G.



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Graph depicts total hospital and inpatient imaging costs at our institution according to fiscal year for years 1996 through 2002. All costs are presented relative to 1996 levels (ie, 1996 levels are set to 100%). In 2002, total hospital costs were 55% higher than they were in 1996, and inpatient imaging costs were 51% higher than they were in 1996.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph depicts inpatient imaging costs as a percentage of hospital costs at our institution according to fiscal year for years 1996 through 2002. Imaging costs, although variable between 1996 and 2002, represented approximately 10% of total hospital costs.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Graph depicts unit cost per MR image and CT scan at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass, according to fiscal year for years 1996 through 2002. All costs are presented relative to 1996 levels (ie, 1996 levels are set to 100%). In 2002, the cost per MR image was 110% that of 1996 levels, whereas the cost per CT scan in 2002 was 59% that of 1996 levels.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.