Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2433052048
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hakimé, A.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hakimé, A.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. N.

CT Perfusion for Determination of Pharmacologically Mediated Blood Flow Changes in an Animal Tumor Model1

Antoine Hakimé, MD2, Himaja Peddi, MD, Andrew U. Hines-Peralta, MD, Carol J. Wilcox, RTR, Jonathan Kruskal, MD, Shezhang Lin, MD, Thierry de Baere, MD, Vassilios D. Raptopoulos, MD, and S. Nahum Goldberg, MD

1 From the Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapy (A.H., H.P., A.U.H., S.L., S.N.G.), Department of Radiology (A.U.H., C.J.W., J.K., V.D.R., S.N.G.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1 Deaconess Rd, WCC 308B, Boston, MA 02215; and the Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France (T.d.B.). Received December 15, 2005; revision requested February 9, 2006; revision received June 1; accepted June 21; final version accepted September 22. Supported by National Cancer Institute Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Renal Cancer SPORE grant 1 P50 CA10194-01. Address correspondence to S.N.G. (e-mail: sgoldber{at}caregroup.harvard.edu).


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1: CT perfusion images show the effect of arsenic trioxide. CT perfusion was used to calculate the drop in tumor blood flow, and measurements were correlated with those obtained with the laser Doppler fiber inserted at the tumor periphery (arrow), as shown on, A, the gray-scale image. For all transverse images, the region that represented the subcutaneous tumor was encircled by the region of interest. Image obtained, B, at baseline shows mean blood flow of 21.9 mL/min; whereas image obtained, C, 1 hour after administration of arsenic trioxide (5 mg/kg) shows blood flow was 14.8 mL/min (a 32.4% decrease).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2: Transverse single-section CT perfusion images show heterogeneity of results between sections. At baseline, mean blood flow for the four 5-mm sections (covering the entire tumor) ranged from 12.31 to 25.33 mL/min (mean, 18.7 mL/min).

 

Figure 3A
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a: (a, b) Graphs show correlation between blood flow changes at CT perfusion and laser Doppler flowmetry. Results for both observers are shown for single- and multisection techniques. When the accuracy of single- and multisection CT techniques used to calculate decreases in blood flow was compared with that of laser Doppler flowmetry, good correlations were achieved for both techniques. Lines represent the relationship between the reference standard and the single- or multisection technique for each observer.

 

Figure 3B
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b: (a, b) Graphs show correlation between blood flow changes at CT perfusion and laser Doppler flowmetry. Results for both observers are shown for single- and multisection techniques. When the accuracy of single- and multisection CT techniques used to calculate decreases in blood flow was compared with that of laser Doppler flowmetry, good correlations were achieved for both techniques. Lines represent the relationship between the reference standard and the single- or multisection technique for each observer.

 

Figure 4A
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a: (a, b) Interreader agreement for percentage of change in blood flow measured with perfusion CT. Bland-Altman plots show that when each observer was allowed to select the section that he or she thought was most representative of the tumor, there was significantly greater interobserver variability (SD, 0.22) for the single-section technique than for the multisection technique (SD, 0.10; P = .01). Bars represent mean differences, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are shown.

 

Figure 4B
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b: (a, b) Interreader agreement for percentage of change in blood flow measured with perfusion CT. Bland-Altman plots show that when each observer was allowed to select the section that he or she thought was most representative of the tumor, there was significantly greater interobserver variability (SD, 0.22) for the single-section technique than for the multisection technique (SD, 0.10; P = .01). Bars represent mean differences, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are shown.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.