Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 9, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2443061588

(Radiology 2007;244:718.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forsberg, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forsberg, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. L.

Breast Lesions: Imaging with Contrast-enhanced Subharmonic US—Initial Experience1

Flemming Forsberg, PhD, Catherine W. Piccoli, MD2, Daniel A. Merton, BS, RDMS, Juan J. Palazzo, MD, and Anne L. Hall, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (F.F., C.W.P., D.A.M.) and Pathology (J.J.P.), Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 763J, Main Building, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107; and GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis (A.L.H.). Received September 13, 2006; revision requested November 9; revision received January 10, 2007; final version accepted February 1. Supported in part by the U.S. Army Medical Research Material Command under DAMD17-00-1-0464 and by GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ. Address correspondence to F.F. (e-mail: flemming.forsberg{at}jefferson.edu).


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1: Flowchart of procedures performed in this pilot study.

 

Figure 2A
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a: Fibroadenoma (arrows) imaged in its largest section by using (a) baseline power Doppler mode and (b) SHI mode after injection of 4.0 mL of Optison. Although the correct diagnosis (probably benign) was obtained with both modalities, note the improved display in SHI mode of small intratumoral vessels (indicating that only minimal bubble destruction is occurring) and the excellent suppression of tissue echoes.

 

Figure 2B
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b: Fibroadenoma (arrows) imaged in its largest section by using (a) baseline power Doppler mode and (b) SHI mode after injection of 4.0 mL of Optison. Although the correct diagnosis (probably benign) was obtained with both modalities, note the improved display in SHI mode of small intratumoral vessels (indicating that only minimal bubble destruction is occurring) and the excellent suppression of tissue echoes.

 

Figure 3A
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a: Benign ductal microcalcifications and fibrocystic changes, as well as areas of hyperplasia and adenosis (arrows in a), are depicted along the longest axis with (a) contrast-enhanced power Doppler imaging and (b) SHI. Note the excessive color blooming in a compared with the improved depiction of small branching vessels within and around the lesion (arrows) in b. However, the SHI image is dominated by excessive noise outside the focal region, and a false-positive assessment was rendered with both imaging modes.

 

Figure 3B
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b: Benign ductal microcalcifications and fibrocystic changes, as well as areas of hyperplasia and adenosis (arrows in a), are depicted along the longest axis with (a) contrast-enhanced power Doppler imaging and (b) SHI. Note the excessive color blooming in a compared with the improved depiction of small branching vessels within and around the lesion (arrows) in b. However, the SHI image is dominated by excessive noise outside the focal region, and a false-positive assessment was rendered with both imaging modes.

 

Figure 4A
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a: (a) Gray-scale US image shows ductal carcinoma in situ (*) and cyst ({otimes}) visualized in their largest cross sections. (b) Contrast-enhanced power Doppler image shows spotty peripheral flow in the cancer and more complete filling (color blooming artifact) in the cyst. (c) Gray-scale SHI image shows both peripheral and intratumoral flow in the cancer (*), while the cyst ({otimes}) is essentially avascular.

 

Figure 4B
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b: (a) Gray-scale US image shows ductal carcinoma in situ (*) and cyst ({otimes}) visualized in their largest cross sections. (b) Contrast-enhanced power Doppler image shows spotty peripheral flow in the cancer and more complete filling (color blooming artifact) in the cyst. (c) Gray-scale SHI image shows both peripheral and intratumoral flow in the cancer (*), while the cyst ({otimes}) is essentially avascular.

 

Figure 4C
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4c: (a) Gray-scale US image shows ductal carcinoma in situ (*) and cyst ({otimes}) visualized in their largest cross sections. (b) Contrast-enhanced power Doppler image shows spotty peripheral flow in the cancer and more complete filling (color blooming artifact) in the cyst. (c) Gray-scale SHI image shows both peripheral and intratumoral flow in the cancer (*), while the cyst ({otimes}) is essentially avascular.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5: Individual ROC curves for the four imaging modalities: baseline gray-scale US (dotted line), contrast-enhanced power Doppler imaging (dash-and-dot line), SHI (solid line), and mammography (dashed line). Note the increased area under the curve for SHI compared with that for baseline US and contrast-enhanced power Doppler.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.