Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 19, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2453061899

(Radiology 2007;245:720.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hamon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hamon, M.

Coronary Arteries: Diagnostic Performance of 16- versus 64-Section Spiral CT Compared with Invasive Coronary Angiography—Meta-Analysis1

Michèle Hamon, MD, Rémy Morello, MD, John W. Riddell, MD, and Martial Hamon, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (Michèle Hamon), Statistics (R.M.), and Cardiology (J.W.R., Martial Hamon), University Hospital of Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen Cedex, Normandy, France. Received November 6, 2006; revision requested January 10, 2007; revision received February 5; accepted March 16; final version accepted May 1. Address correspondence to Michèle Hamon (e-mail: hamon-mi{at}chu-caen.fr).


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1: Flow diagram of the reviewing process.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2: Diagnostic performance of 16-section CT (white bars) compared with 64-section CT (black bars) on a per-segment basis (P < .001 for all).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3: Diagnostic performance of 16-section CT (white bars) compared with 64-section CT (black bars) on a per-patient basis (P = .03 for sensitivity, P < .001 for the other values).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4: Plot of symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) on a per-patient basis for comparison of multisection CT with coronary angiography. Left: 16-section CT. Right: 64-section CT. The receiver operating characteristic curve provides a graphical display of diagnostic accuracy, by plotting specificity subtracted from one on the horizontal axis and sensitivity on the vertical axis. The pertinent area under the curve (AUC) and Cochran Q statistic (Q*) (the point where sensitivity and specificity are maximal), both with standard errors (SE), are also included.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.