Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rettenbacher, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gritzmann, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rettenbacher, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gritzmann, N.
(Radiology. 1999;211:389-394.)
© RSNA, 1999

Gastrointestinal Imaging

Adult Celiac Disease: US Signs1

Thomas Rettenbacher, MD, Alois Hollerweger, MD, Peter Macheiner, MD, Sebastian Huber, MD and Norbert Gritzmann, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (T.R., A.H., P.M., N.G.) and Internal Medicine (S.H.), Hospital Barmherzige Brueder, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010 Salzburg, Austria. From the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 21, 1998; revision requested April 2; final revision received November 11; accepted January 8, 1999. Address reprint requests to T.R.


   Abstract
TOP
 Abstract
Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To examine whether distinct ultrasonographic (US) signs exist in patients with adult celiac disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a partly retrospective study, abdominal sonograms were obtained in 11 patients with adult celiac disease. Fifty matched control subjects also were examined. After the patients had fasted overnight, they were examined with 2–4-MHz abdominal and high-frequency 5–10-MHz linear-array US transducers.

RESULTS: The authors found several US pathologic signs in patients with untreated disease, including abnormal fluid-filled small intestine in all 11 patients, flaccid and moderately dilated small-bowel loops (2.5–3.5 cm) in eight, slight diffuse thickening of the small-bowel wall (3–5 mm) in seven, increased peristalsis of the small intestine in eight, enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes (anteroposterior diameter 5–10 mm) in nine, dilated caliber of the superior mesenteric artery or portal vein in seven, free fluid in the abdominal cavity in five, and increased echogenicity of the liver in six. None of these signs was present in the control group.

CONCLUSION: There are several US signs associated with adult celiac disease. None of the signs identified is specific, but a combination of signs is characteristic and indicates suspicion of this disease in a high percentage of cases. US could help to avoid diagnostic delay, especially in patients who have atypical clinical presentations.

Index terms: Abdomen, US, 74.12989, 79.12989 • Celiac disease, 74.7611 • Intestines, abnormalities, 74.7611 • Intestines, US, 74.12989


   Introduction
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Adult celiac disease is a chronic disease in which there is a characteristic but nonspecific mucosal lesion of the small intestine that impairs nutrient absorption and improves with withdrawal of wheat gliadins and barley, rye, and oat prolamins from the diet (1,2).

Adult celiac disease occurs largely in white individuals. Prevalence ratios in Europe range from a high of 1:300 in western Ireland to between 1:1,000 and 1:2,000 in other regions. The true prevalence is certainly higher, because a substantial number of individuals have no or mild symptoms (3).

The symptoms vary tremendously from patient to patient and depend largely on the length and severity of damage to the small bowel (4,5). The classic clinical presentation includes diarrhea, steatorrhea, flatulence, weight loss, and fatigue. Laboratory abnormalities include iron deficiency or folate deficiency anemia; low serum levels of cholesterol, calcium, and albumin; elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase and liver enzymes; and a prolonged prothrombin time. In the past 10 years, the assessment of antigliadin and antiendomysial antibodies have gained in importance in confirming the clinical suspicion of adult celiac disease and in screening the families of patients with the disease (6).

The small-bowel enema examination has been widely advocated and used as a noninvasive diagnostic examination in patients suspected of having adult celiac disease (2,7). Other imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography (US), have not been established in confirming the diagnosis of adult celiac disease, but they have been described as useful in demonstrating complications such as malignant transformation or huge lymphadenopathy (2,8,9). CT and US, however, have a role in other more common diseases of the small intestine such as Crohn disease, small-bowel obstruction, or tumor (10–12).

The essential step in the diagnosis is biopsy of the mucosa of the proximal small intestine, with results that show a lack or reduction of villi and crypt hyperplasia with increased mitoses (1). There also is an increased number of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and mast cells in the lamina propria and epithelium (1). Although the histologic appearance of the mucosa is characteristic, it is not specific. The definite diagnosis of adult celiac disease is therefore based on two criteria: the characteristic small-intestine biopsy specimen and clinical and histologic improvement after institution of a gluten-free diet (6). A gluten-free diet for the rest of life is the treatment of choice.

Patients suspected of having adult celiac disease can immediately undergo jejunal mucosal biopsy without any prior imaging investigation to confirm the diagnosis. However, in a substantial number of patients, the clinical symptoms and laboratory findings are atypical or subdued; therefore, adult celiac disease is not infrequently overlooked (3–5). Patients with an atypical clinical presentation (for instance, anemia or weight loss only) are often referred for routine US of the abdomen as the first imaging examination. There may exist distinct US signs or a combination of signs in patients with adult celiac disease that could arouse initial suspicion and assist in the diagnosis of the disease. Subsequent mucosal biopsy would then confirm the diagnosis without delay. This study was therefore performed to investigate the various US features that we observed in patients whose ultimate diagnosis was adult celiac disease to determine whether distinct US signs exist in patients with this disease.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
From 1987 to 1996 at our hospital, the definite diagnosis of adult celiac disease was established in 11 patients aged 28–70 years. All these patients were included in the study. In all patients, abdominal US was performed, and the findings were documented by one of four experienced gastrointestinal radiologists (T.R., A.H., P.M., N.G.) before adult celiac disease was diagnosed. All sonograms were then evaluated collectively by these four investigators, and a consensus opinion on the findings was reached. The patients fasted overnight but were not specially prepared for the examination. To examine the first three patients (1987–1989), we used the model EUB-340 US unit with a 3.5-MHz curved-array transducer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). In eight patients (1990–1996), we used the model UM9 C US unit with 3.5-MHz annular-array and 5-MHz linear-array transducers (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, Wash) and the model AU4 US unit with 3.5-MHz curved-array and 7.5–10.0-MHz linear-array transducers (Esaote, Florence, Italy).

From 1987 to 1993, the diagnosis of adult celiac disease was established in six patients. In all of them, we noted a variety of US findings, which were evaluated retrospectively in this study. From 1994 to 1996, there were five patients with adult celiac disease, and in each case, we proposed this diagnosis on the basis of US findings alone before it was confirmed by using biopsy. The US pathologic signs in these five patients were evaluated prospectively.

Abdominal US examinations performed prospectively in 50 adult control subjects (29 women, 21 men) also were included in this study. These individuals were from an abdominal US screening program that has been offered to almost all of our inpatients—even those who do not have clinical abdominal symptoms—since 1988 as common practice. Informed consent was obtained from each subject, and this practice has been approved by the ethical committee at our hospital. The only selection criteria were normal weight and no sign of abdominal disease. The control subjects fasted overnight for the general screening investigation but were not specially prepared. The body mass index of the control subjects was 18–25 (mean index, 21) and thus somewhat higher than that of the underweight patients with adult celiac disease (body mass index, 13–23; mean index, 18). US was performed in these subjects by using the model HDI 3000 unit with 2–4-MHz curved-array and 5–10-MHz linear-array transducers (Advanced Technology Laboratories) and the model AU4 unit with 3.5-MHz curved-array and 7.5–10.0-MHz linear-array transducers (Esaote).

The US signs that were investigated in the 11 patients with adult celiac disease and in the 50 control subjects are (a) fluid within the small bowel, (b) diameter of the small bowel, (c) thickness of the small-bowel wall, (d) peristalsis of the small intestine, (e) diameter of the mesenteric lymph nodes, (f) diameter of the superior mesenteric artery or portal vein, (g) free fluid in the abdominal cavity, and (h) echogenicity of the liver.

The following data with regard to normal findings refer to the results in the control group in our study and to data from the literature. In a healthy individual (ie, control subject) who has fasted overnight, US will demonstrate little or no fluid within some small-bowel loops. The echogenicity of the fluid in such subjects usually is echo free or echo poor. A marked amount of fluid in numerous small-bowel loops is considered to be abnormal.

The diameter of the small bowel (ie, the outer diameter including the bowel wall) in a healthy individual (ie, control subject) with an empty stomach can be up to 2 cm. Small-bowel loops with diameters between 2.5 and 3.5 cm are considered to be moderately dilated.

The wall thickness of the small intestine in a noncontracted condition is 1–2 mm in healthy individuals (ie, control subjects). Normal layers of small intestine (eg, mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria) can hardly be differentiated in a noncontracted condition but are well distinguishable in a contracted condition. The valvulae conniventes are clearly visible in fluid-filled loops only. A wall thickness of 3-5 mm is considered to be slightly thickened.

In patients with an empty stomach, peristalsis of the small intestine is slow and relatively rare. Sometimes moderate peristalsis can be observed, but this affects only single parts of the small bowel in control subjects. In our study, if the peristalsis was permanent and marked in the entire small intestine, it was considered to be abnormal. The degree of severity of this sign is, however, difficult to objectively determine.

Normal mesenteric lymph nodes could be demonstrated with US in 35 of the 50 control subjects. These nodes had an anteroposterior diameter of 2–5 mm (mean diameter, 3.5 mm), transverse diameter of 4–14 mm (mean, 7 mm), and longitudinal diameter of 6–24 mm (mean, 12 mm). The anteroposterior diameter is the most reliable parameter in differentiating between normal and enlarged nodes and was used as the criterion. Lymph nodes with an anteroposterior diameter greater than 5 mm were considered to be pathologic.

The width of the superior mesenteric artery was measured 2–3 cm distal to the origin but proximal to any side branch. Measurements of the portal vein were obtained at its widest part in the hepatoduodenal ligament. The diameter of the superior mesenteric artery in the healthy individuals was 4–7 mm (mean diameter, 5.3 mm) in women and 6–8 mm (mean, 6.5 mm) in men; the diameter of the portal vein was 7–12 mm (mean, 10.9 mm) in both women and men. Vessels with diameters greater than the maximum values were considered to be dilated.

In men, free fluid in the abdominal cavity was always considered to be abnormal. However, a small amount of free fluid was found in six of the 25 women of child-bearing age. This fluid is usually visible only around the uterus and not between bowel loops.

The echogenicity of the liver in individuals who are healthy and of normal weight is comparable to that of the normal kidney. Increased echogenicity of the liver, which is a sensitive indication of fatty degeneration, is uncommon in patients with a low body mass index and is considered to be pathologic. None of the control subjects in this study had liver tissue texture changes.


   RESULTS
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 References
 
The US pathologic signs and their frequencies in the patients with adult celiac disease in our study (Table 1) were as follows. All patients (n = 11) had abnormal fluid-filled small-bowel loops (Figs 1, 2). In nine patients, this fluid was very echo poor to almost echo free at US, whereas in two, the fluid collections were echogenic. This abnormality was diffuse and not obviously pronounced proximally or distally in the small intestine.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. US Signs in 11 Patients with Adult Celiac Disease
 


View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1a. Transverse US scans of the lower part of the abdomen in (a) patient 9 and (b–d) patient 3, who have adult celiac disease, show pathologic small-bowel loops. Increased intraluminal fluid, which is almost echo free, flaccid and moderately dilated bowel loops (arrowheads in a), a moderately thickened small-bowel wall, and valvulae conniventes (arrows) are seen.

 


View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1b. Transverse US scans of the lower part of the abdomen in (a) patient 9 and (b–d) patient 3, who have adult celiac disease, show pathologic small-bowel loops. Increased intraluminal fluid, which is almost echo free, flaccid and moderately dilated bowel loops (arrowheads in a), a moderately thickened small-bowel wall, and valvulae conniventes (arrows) are seen.

 


View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1c. Transverse US scans of the lower part of the abdomen in (a) patient 9 and (b–d) patient 3, who have adult celiac disease, show pathologic small-bowel loops. Increased intraluminal fluid, which is almost echo free, flaccid and moderately dilated bowel loops (arrowheads in a), a moderately thickened small-bowel wall, and valvulae conniventes (arrows) are seen.

 


View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1d. Transverse US scans of the lower part of the abdomen in (a) patient 9 and (b–d) patient 3, who have adult celiac disease, show pathologic small-bowel loops. Increased intraluminal fluid, which is almost echo free, flaccid and moderately dilated bowel loops (arrowheads in a), a moderately thickened small-bowel wall, and valvulae conniventes (arrows) are seen.

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Patient 9. Longitudinal US scan of the right lower part of the abdomen in this patient, who has adult celiac disease, shows a small amount of free fluid (thick arrows) in the abdominal cavity. An abnormal fluid-filled, moderately dilated small-bowel loop (thin arrows) with thickened valvulae conniventes also is seen.

 
The small intestine was moderately dilated (range, 2.5–3.5 cm; mean, 2.9 cm) at US in eight (73%) patients (Fig 1). The appearance of the bowel loops was flaccid, that is, the shape of the transverse section was ovoid or polygonal.

Diffuse thickening of the small-bowel wall and valvulae conniventes was noted at US in seven (64%) patients (Figs 1, 2). The thickening was slight (range, 3–5 mm; mean, 3.5 mm), and the layers of the wall were preserved.

Marked peristalsis of the small intestine was noted at US in eight (73%) patients. The peristalsis was permanent and not confined to a single part of the small bowel.

Numerous moderately enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes (anteroposterior diameter, 5–10 mm; mean, 7 mm) were evident at US in nine (82%) patients (Fig 3). The nodes were ovoid, relatively echogenic, and had a normal hilum (Fig 3). Their appearance was that of typical reactive enlarged nodes.



View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Patient 3. Longitudinal US scan of the middle part of the abdomen in this patient, who has adult celiac disease, shows enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes (straight arrows). The nodes are relatively echogenic, have a normal hilum (arrowheads), and are ovoid. Mesenteric vessels (curved arrows) also are seen.

 
A dilated caliber of the superior mesenteric artery (range, 8–11 mm; mean, 9 mm) (Fig 4) or portal vein (range, 13–17 mm; mean, 15 mm) was documented with US in seven (64%) patients.



View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4a. Patient 10. (a) Longitudinal and (b) transverse abdominal US scans show a dilated (11-mm) mesenteric artery (thin arrows) in this patient, who has adult celiac disease. The abdominal aorta (thick arrow) also is seen.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4b. Patient 10. (a) Longitudinal and (b) transverse abdominal US scans show a dilated (11-mm) mesenteric artery (thin arrows) in this patient, who has adult celiac disease. The abdominal aorta (thick arrow) also is seen.

 
Free fluid in the abdominal cavity was detected at US in five (45%) patients (Fig 2). This fluid appeared as small triangular echo-free areas between the small-bowel loops.

A diffuse increase in echogenicity of the liver was noted at US in six (55%) patients, although their body mass indexes were low (range, 13–23; mean, 18). All patients who had steatosis had pathologic serum liver enzymes (viral infections were excluded by serologic examinations), and the patients who had almost normal or normal liver parameters had no increased liver echogenicity at US (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Laboratory Parameters in 11 Patients with Adult Celiac Disease
 
There was no identifiable correlation between the various US findings of adult celiac disease and the degree of severity of the mucosal biopsy result. In those patients who kept to a gluten-free diet, the various US pathologic signs either disappeared or improved markedly at reexamination; this indicated that these signs were related to adult celiac disease and not to other pathologic entities.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
References
 
The small-bowel enema examination has been the only imaging modality used to establish the diagnosis of adult celiac disease (2,13,14). To our knowledge, there are few reports that describe dilated fluid-filled small intestine, enteroenteric intussusception, and lymphadenopathy in the mesentery and retroperitoneum in patients with adult celiac disease identified by using CT (15–17). Riccabona and Rossipal (18,19) described the following US signs associated with celiac disease in infants: abnormal appearance of a small-bowel wall structure (94%), hyperperistalsis (82%), slight ascites (76%), pericardial fluid (47%), and liver tissue texture changes.

To our knowledge, this is the first study in which several pathologic signs in patients with adult celiac disease detected by using US are described and in which it is proposed that a strong suspicion of adult celiac disease can be raised by using US alone in a high percentage of cases. In our hospital, US is now the first step in establishing this diagnosis. For example, the medical history of our most recent patient (patient 10), who presented with a 6-week history of diarrhea and weight loss of 4 kg, was uneventful, and all laboratory parameters were normal (Table 2). After US revealed the characteristic combination of pathologic signs (Table 1), the patient immediately underwent biopsy. Because the presentation of the patient was uncharacteristic, he might have left the hospital without a diagnosis of adult celiac disease if US findings had not supported the suspicion.

The fluid-filled small intestine in patients with adult celiac disease can be explained by impaired absorption and hypersecretion (20). US is very sensitive in the detection of echo-poor fluid within the bowel (10). This US finding has not been described in association with adult celiac disease previously, but indirect signs of this phenomenon such as segmentation, dilution, and flocculation of contrast agent at small-bowel enema studies are well-described radiographic diagnostic criteria for adult celiac disease (13,20,21). Increased fluid within the bowel, however, is not specific; it also occurs after ingestion, after resection or removal of the stomach, in diseases like enteritis, small-bowel obstruction, peritoneal carcinosis, and Wipple disease, and in other diseases with malabsorption (10).

In several radiographic studies (20–22) with small-bowel enema examinations, moderate dilatation of flaccid small-bowel loops has been described as an important criterion for adult celiac disease, with a prevalence between 69% and 88%. In the present study, the radiographic method was expected to demonstrate this sign in a higher percentage of cases than was US, because we examined patients who had fasted overnight. When there is not enough fluid within the small bowel, dilatation cannot be demonstrated with US, whereas the small-bowel enema fills the intestine with 1.00–1.50 L of contrast agent and therefore can demonstrate dilatation of flaccid loops in a higher percentage of cases. This sign, however, also can be found in small-bowel obstruction, where the bowel loops appear to be stiff, as opposed to in adult celiac disease, where they appear to be flaccid. Dilated flaccid small-bowel loops and increased intraluminal fluid also are described with severe enteritis, jejunal diverticulosis, and scleroderma (2,23).

To our knowledge, moderate thickening of the small-bowel wall and increased peristalsis in patients who have adult celiac disease have not been described previously by using US, but they are well documented signs of adult celiac disease at small-bowel enema studies (13,14,20–22). These findings can also be found in severe enteritis, which is often pronounced in the right lower region of the small intestine (ie, ileum) (24). Hyperperistalsis of the fluid-filled small intestine without wall thickening can be found after ingestion, in patients who have enteritis, and in some types of ileus (20).

The prevalence of mesenteric lymphadenopathy in patients with adult celiac disease was 12% in one study (25) but 0% in several others (26,27). In contrast, our observations indicate that lymph node enlargement exists in many cases of adult celiac disease. This is in accordance with one of the earlier reports (28) on adult celiac disease, in which all four patients who underwent laparotomy were found to have enlarged mesenteric nodes. Histologic evaluation of the nodes demonstrated chronic inflammatory changes and fibrosis (9,28). It can be assumed that mesenteric lymphadenopathy is present in many cases of adult celiac disease, but frequently it is not recognized because laparotomy is no longer necessary to obtain jejunal biopsy specimens (29). In the literature, there are also case reports on huge nonmalignant lymph node enlargement in adult celiac disease (8,9,29). It must be emphasized that lymph node enlargement can also be a sign of malignant lymphoma complicating adult celiac disease (8). Therefore, careful examination and follow-up with US or CT should confirm an improvement or disappearance of adenopathy after therapy.

Our observation of dilated mesenteric vessels in patients with adult celiac disease is in accordance with that in an angiographic study (30) in which this sign was described in a high percentage of cases. It is also known from the literature that adult celiac disease is associated with hemodynamic disturbances in the intestinal circulation, such as shortening of the blood transit time and increased blood flow volume (30–32). It is assumed that the causes of these phenomena are raised levels of vasoactive hormones, the destruction of the capillary bed of the small-intestine mucosa, and the creation of arteriovenous shunts (30–32). Increased blood flow in the mesenteric vessels has also been described in the literature as accompanying inflammatory bowel diseases such as severe Crohn disease and severe ulcerative colitis (33).

Free fluid in the abdominal cavity has not been previously described in association with adult celiac disease, but Riccabona and Rossipal (18,19) found this sign in infants with celiac disease in about 76% of cases. To our knowledge, no explanation for this phenomenon is available in the literature. One explanation could be the chronic inflammatory process in the small intestine and mesenteric lymph nodes in these patients. Free fluid is not a specific sign; it also occurs in patients with cirrhosis of the liver, peritoneal carcinosis, vascular and inflammatory processes of the abdomen, cardiac decompensation, and hypoproteinemia.

It is known from several studies (34,35) that abnormalities in liver enzymes are common with untreated adult celiac disease, but they usually respond to dietary gluten exclusion. The US images obtained in all of the patients with pathologic liver enzymes in our study showed increased hepatic echogenicity, which is a sensitive indication of fatty degeneration. The common causes of fatty degeneration of the liver include alcoholism, diabetes mellitus, hyperalimentation, toxic disturbance, therapy with glucocorticoids, protein deficiency, and intestinal malabsorption. The reasons for liver abnormalities in patients with adult celiac disease are still unknown, but it is assumed that they are a consequence of metabolic derangement from malabsorption (29).

A limitation of this study is that the patient group was small and the study was designed prospectively for only the last five patients. US technology improved during the study period, and in the first three patients, we did not use high-frequency transducers. Therefore, the prevalences of some of the described criteria might have been underestimated. The true prevalences must be determined prospectively with a larger patient population.

Each US sign described in this study is nonspecific and can occur in various other diseases. A combination of the signs, however, is characteristic and thus cause for suspicion of adult celiac disease in a high percentage of cases and enables the differential diagnosis of other more common diseases such as small-bowel obstruction or infection. Dilated fluid-filled bowel loops can also be found in small-bowel obstruction, where they appear stiff and round on transverse US sections and the colon is usually contracted. Infection leads to abnormal fluid collections of the bowel, increased peristalsis, and possibly to enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, but there are no dilated mesenteric vessels and the diameter of the small-bowel loops is usually normal.

In conclusion, various US signs that enable the identification of adult celiac disease in a high percentage of cases are detectable in patients who have untreated adult celiac disease. US will not eliminate either of the two essential steps of diagnosis—biopsy and clinical improvement after institution of a gluten-free diet—but it could become a useful tool in shortening the diagnostic process, especially in patients with atypical clinical presentations. Because many patients who have adult celiac disease present with nonspecific symptoms, US may be the first imaging examination performed. The sonographer should, therefore, be familiar with the US appearance of this condition.


   Footnotes
 
Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, T.R., A.H., N.G.; study concepts and design, T.R., A.H.; definition of intellectual content, T.R., A.H., N.G.; literature research, T.R., S.H.; clinical studies, T.R., A.H., P.M.; data acquisition, T.R., A.H., P.M., S.H.; data analysis, T.R., A.H., S.H.; manuscript preparation, T.R., A.H.; manuscript editing, T.R.; manuscript review, A.H., P.M., N.G., S.H.


   References
TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Rubin CE, Eidelman S, Weinstein WM. Sprue by any other name. Gastroenterology 1970; 58:409-413.[Medline]
  2. Rubesin SE, Rubin RA, Herlinger H. Small-bowel malabsorption: clinical and radiologic perspectives. Radiology 1992; 184:297-305.[Free Full Text]
  3. Mann JG, Brown WR, Kern F. The subtle and variable clinical expression of gluten-induced enteropathy (adult celiac disease, nontropical sprue): an analysis of twenty-one cases. Am J Med 1970; 48:357-366.[Medline]
  4. Catassi C, Ratsch IM, Fabiani E, et al. Coeliac disease in the year 2000: exploring the iceberg. Lancet 1994; 343:200-203.[Medline]
  5. Unsworth JS, Brown DL. Serological screening suggests that adult coeliac disease is underdiagnosed in the U.K. and increases the incidence by up to 12%. Gut 1994; 35:61-64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Corrao G, Corazza GR, Andreani ML, et al. Serological screening of coeliac disease: choosing the optimal procedure according to various prevalence values. Gut 1994; 35:771-775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Maglinte DDT, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, Rex D, Chernish SM. Small-bowel radiography: how, when, and why. Radiology 1987; 163:297-305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Al-Kawas FH, Murgo A, Foshag L, Shiels W. Lymphadenopathy in celiac disease: not always a sign of lymphoma. Am J Gastroenterol 1988; 83:301-303.[Medline]
  9. Jones B, Bayless TM, Fishman EK, Siegelman SS. Lymphadenopathy in celiac disease: computed tomographic observations. AJR 1984; 142:1127-1132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ko YT, Lim JH, Lee DH, Lee HW, Lim JW. Small-bowel obstruction: sonographic evaluation. Radiology 1993; 188:649-653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Maconi G, Parente F, Bollani S, Cesana B, Bianchi Porro G. Abdominal ultrasound in the assessment of extent and activity of Crohn's disease: clinical significance and implication of bowel wall thickening. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91:1604-1609.[Medline]
  12. Maccioni F, Rossi P, Gourtsoyiannis N, Bezzi M, Di Nardo R, Broglia L. US and CT findings of small bowel neoplasms. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:1398-1409.[Medline]
  13. Rubesin SE, Herlinger H, Saul SH, Grumbach K, Laufer I, Levine MS. Adult celiac disease and its complications. RadioGraphics 1989; 9:1045-1066.[Abstract]
  14. Van den Bosch HCM, Tjon A, Tham RTO, Gooszen AW, Fauquenot-Nollen JMB, Lamers CBHW. Celiac disease: small-bowel enteroclysis findings in adult patients treated with a gluten-free diet. Radiology 1996; 201:803-808.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Strobl PW, Warshauer DM. CT diagnosis of celiac disease. Comput Tomogr 1995; 19:319-320.
  16. Merine DS, Fishman EK, Jones B, Siegelman SS. Enteroenteric intussusception: CT findings in nine patients. AJR 1987; 148:1129-1132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Horton KM, Fishman EK. Uncommon inflammatory diseases of the small bowel: CT findings. AJR 1998; 170:385-388.[Free Full Text]
  18. Riccabona M, Rossipal E. Sonographic findings in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1993; 17:198-200.[Medline]
  19. Riccabona M, Rossipal E. Use of sonography in the diagnosis of celiac disease. Ultraschall Med 1996; 17:31-33.[Medline]
  20. Ruoff M, Lindner AE, Marshak RH. Intussusception in sprue. AJR 1968; 104:525-528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Marn CS, Gore RM, Ghahremani GG. Duodenal manifestations of nontropical sprue. Gastrointest Radiol 1986; 11:30-35.[Medline]
  22. Masterson JB, Sweeney EC, Path MC. The role of small bowel follow-through examination in the diagnosis of coeliac disease. Br J Radiol 1976; 49:660-664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Maglinte DDT, Chernish SM, DeWeese R, Kelvin FM, Brunelle RL. Acquired jejunoileal diverticular disease: subject review. Radiology 1986; 158:577-580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Puylaert JBCM, Lalisang RI, Van der Werf SDJ, Doornbos L. Campylobacter ileocolitis mimicking acute appendicitis: differentiation with graded-compression US. Radiology 1988; 166:737-774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bossak ET, Wang CI, Adlersberg D. Clinical aspects of the malabsorption syndrome (idiopathic sprue) In: Adlersberg D, ed. The malabsorption syndrome. New York, NY: Grune & Stratten, 1957.
  26. Green PA, Wollaeger AE. The clinical behavior of sprue in the United States. Gastroenterology 1960; 38:399-418.[Medline]
  27. Benson GD, Kowlessar OD, Sleisinger MH. Adult coeliac disease with emphasis upon responses to gluten-free diet. Medicine 1964; 43:1-40.[Medline]
  28. Pauley JW. Observations on the etiology of idiopathic steatorrhea: jejunal and lymph node biopsies. Br Med J 1954; 2:1318-1321.
  29. Naschitz JE, Yeshurun D, Zuckerman E, Arad E, Boss JH. Massive hepatic steatosis complicating adult celiac disease: report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 1987; 82:1186-1189.[Medline]
  30. Gustafson T, Sjölund K, Berg NO. Intestinal circulation in coeliac disease: an angiographic study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1982; 17:881-885.[Medline]
  31. Bolondi L, Li Bassi S, Gaiani S, Zironi G, Paparo GF, Barbara L. Changes in mesenteric venous flow due to celiac sprue. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37:925-928.[Medline]
  32. Alvarez D, Vazquez H, Bai JC, Mastai R, Flores D, Boerr L. Superior mesenteric artery flow in celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:1175-1182.[Medline]
  33. Multen L, Lindhagen J, Lundgren O, Fasth S, Ahren CH. Regional intestinal blood flow in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1977; 72:388-396.[Medline]
  34. Dickey W, McMillan SA, Collins JS, Watson RG, McLoughlin JC, Love AH. Liver abnormalities associated with celiac sprue: how common are they, what is their significance, and what do we do about them?. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995; 20:290-292.[Medline]
  35. Hagander B, Berg NO, Brandt L, et al. Hepatic injury in adult coeliac disease. Lancet 1977; 2:270-272.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
M. Fraquelli, A. Colli, A. Colucci, M. T. Bardella, C. Trovato, R. Pometta, M. Pagliarulo, and D. Conte
Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Predicting Celiac Disease
Arch Intern Med, January 26, 2004; 164(2): 169 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rettenbacher, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gritzmann, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rettenbacher, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gritzmann, N.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE