Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaw, T.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, C.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaw, T.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, C.-K.
(Radiology. 1999;212:249-256.)
© RSNA, 1999


Pediatric Imaging

MR Cholangiography in the Evaluation of Neonatal Cholestasis1

Twei-Shiun Jaw, MD, Yu-Ting Kuo, MD, Gin-Chung Liu, MD, Shaou-Hsium Chen, MD and Chien-Kuo Wang, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (T.S.J., Y.T.K., G.C.L., C.K.W.) and Pediatric Surgery (S.H.C.), Kaohsiung Medical College, 100 Shih-Chuan First Rd, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, Republic of China. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 29, 1998; revision requested June 16; final revision received December 15; accepted January 19, 1999. Address reprint requests to T.S.J. (e-mail: m810101@cc.kmc.edu.tw).


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography in excluding biliary atresia as the cause of neonatal cholestasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR cholangiography was performed on 10 control and 16 jaundiced neonates and infants aged 3 days to 5 months. Diagnosis of biliary atresia (n = 6) was confirmed with surgery and liver biopsy, with or without surgical cholangiography. Diagnosis of neonatal hepatitis (n = 9) was confirmed with clinical follow-up until jaundice resolved. In one infant, paucity of intrahepatic ducts was diagnosed at liver biopsy. MR cholangiography was performed with respiratory-triggered, heavily T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and optional inversion-recovery turbo spin-echo sequences. Diagnosis of biliary atresia was based on nonvisualization of either the common bile duct or common hepatic duct. Cholescintigraphy with technetium 99m disofenin was performed in all 16 jaundiced patients.

RESULTS: In the 10 controls, the nine patients with neonatal hepatitis, and the one infant with paucity of intrahepatic ducts, MR cholangiography clearly depicted the gallbladder and common hepatic and common bile ducts. MR cholangiography was 100% accurate in excluding biliary atresia as the cause of neonatal cholestasis, while 99mTc disofenin cholescintigraphic findings were false-positive in four of 10 patients with nonobstructive cholestasis.

CONCLUSION: MR cholangiography can be used to depict the major biliary structures of neonates and small infants and to exclude biliary atresia as the cause of neonatal cholestasis by allowing visualization of the biliary tract.

Index terms: Bile ducts, abnormalities, 768.1434 • Bile ducts, MR, 768.121411, 768.121413, 768.121415, 768.121416 • Bile ducts, radionuclide studies, 768.12172 • Gallbladder, 762.1434 • Infants, 762.1434


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Prompt and accurate differentiation of biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis is of great clinical importance because patients with biliary atresia must undergo surgery as soon as possible to have a better surgical outcome (1,2). Until now, cholescintigraphy has been thought to be the most sensitive modality (97%–100%) to distinguish biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis, but the specificity of cholescintigraphy varies from 67% to 93%, depending on the technetium 99m–labeled radiopharmaceutical agent used (36). Recently, magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography has been used to demonstrate the normal biliary tree in neonates and infants (7,8). We speculate that MR cholangiography may replace diagnostic laparotomy and surgical cholangiography in jaundiced neonates in whom no bowel excretion is seen on cholescintigrams. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MR cholangiography in excluding biliary atresia as the cause of neonatal cholestasis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Patients
Using MR cholangiography, we prospectively evaluated the bile duct anatomy of 26 neonates and infants, aged 3 days to 5 months. Ten neonates and infants were nonjaundiced control subjects who were undergoing MR imaging of the brain, and 16 neonates and infants had jaundice. The study protocols had been approved by our institutional review boards. Informed consent to perform MR cholangiography was obtained from the parents.

The control group included seven male and three female neonates and infants, aged 3 days to 5 months (mean age, 106 days). Sixteen consecutive neonates and infants who had neonatal cholestatic jaundice were included in this prospective study. They included 11 male and five female neonates and infants, aged 15–65 days (mean age, 46 days). Clinically, these patients had clay-colored stool and prolonged conjugated hyperbilirubinemia that occurred within the first 2 months of life (9). Prolonged conjugated hyperbilirubinemia was defined as a total serum bilirubin level of more than 3.0 mg/dL (51 µmol/L), with the direct form more than 40% of the total (normal values, 0.2–1.0 mg/dL [3.4–17 µmol/L] and 0–0.2 mg/dL [0–3.4 µmol/L], respectively). Most of the jaundiced patients also had an increased serum {gamma}-glutamyltransferase level (normal values, 3–30 U/L) (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Clinical Data, Imaging Findings, and Final Diagnoses in 16 Patients with Neonatal Cholestasis
 
In the six patients with biliary atresia, the findings were confirmed at laparotomy; three underwent surgical cholangiography. Surgical cholangiography was not performed in the other three patients with biliary atresia because only fibrotic remnants of ducts were found at surgery. Of the six patients with biliary atresia, three had complete fibrous obliteration of the extrahepatic bile duct (type A), two had a patent but extremely thin common bile duct with atretic hepatic ducts (type B), and one had a cyst at the hilum of the liver with an atretic common bile duct (type C) (Fig 1) (Table) (10). All patients with biliary atresia underwent a Kasai operation (hepatoportoenterostomy).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Drawing shows the three types of biliary atresia. Type A (n = 3) has complete fibrous obliteration of the entire extrahepatic bile duct. Type B (n = 2) shows a patent but extremely hypoplastic common bile duct with atretic hepatic ducts. Type C (n = 1) has a cystic dilatation of the common hepatic duct with an atretic common bile duct.

 
Liver aspiration biopsy was performed in eight patients, including six patients with biliary atresia, one patient with neonatal hepatitis, and the one patient with paucity of intrahepatic ducts. Liver biopsy was not performed in the remaining eight patients with neonatal hepatitis; in six patients, liver biopsy was not performed because biliary atresia could be excluded by the presence of bowel activity on cholescintigrams, and for two patients, the parents refused biopsy.

The findings from liver biopsy revealed that four patients with biliary atresia showed typical histopathologic features, with bile duct proliferation, bile plugs, and periportal fibrosis. In the other two patients with biliary atresia, the findings from biopsy showed giant cell transformation and canalicular and cellular bile stasis, without definite bile duct proliferation or periportal fibrosis. In one patient with neonatal hepatitis, the findings from biopsy showed giant cell transformation, inflammatory cell infiltration, and lobular disorganization. The results of liver biopsy in the patient with paucity of intrahepatic ducts showed no interlobular bile duct in several portal areas.

In the nine patients with idiopathic neonatal hepatitis, the diagnosis was verified by the patient's recovery from jaundice and the normalization of laboratory values during the clinical follow-up period. The duration of follow-up was 3–12 months. In the patient with paucity of intrahepatic ducts, azotemia and imaging findings of infantile polycystic kidney disease were noted in addition to the cholestasis.

Imaging
All patients had fasted for at least 3 hours before the MR examination and were sedated with rectal administration of secobarbital (5–10 mg per kilogram of body weight) or with oral or rectal administration of chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg). MR examination was performed with a 1.5-T magnet (Gyroscan ACS-NT; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). A flexible surface coil (E1; rectangular and measuring 16 x 13.5 cm) was wrapped around the upper portion of the abdomen of the neonates and infants.

MR imaging sequences included a coronal T2-weighted, spectral presaturation with inversion recovery (IR), turbo spin-echo (SE) sequence (1,650/80 [repetition time msec/effective echo time msec]) with an echo train length of 14; an axial T2-weighted, turbo SE sequence (1,650/100 [effective]) with an echo train length of 18; and an axial T1-weighted turbo gradient-echo sequence (15/5; flip angle, 25°). MR cholangiography was performed with a two-dimensional (2D), non–breath-hold, respiratory-triggered, heavily T2-weighted, fat-suppressed, turbo SE sequence (3,000/700 [effective]) with an echo train length of 128. Coronal source images were obtained with a 2-mm section thickness and a 1-mm overlap. The number of signals acquired was six. We used a 195 x 256 matrix. In addition, a three-dimensional (3D) IR turbo SE sequence (7,000/1,000 [effective]/50 [repetition time msec/effective echo time msec/inversion time msec]) with an echo train length of 116 was also used in five control subjects, six neonates and infants with biliary atresia, and one infant with paucity of intrahepatic ducts. The number of signals acquired was two.

The 2D or 3D acquisition images were reformatted by using a standard maximum intensity projection (MIP) algorithm to create a rotating display. Imaging time for MR cholangiography varied from 6 minutes 11 seconds to 12 minutes 36 seconds. The total imaging time ranged from 20 to 30 minutes.

Cholescintigraphy with 99mTc disofenin was also performed with a gamma camera scanner (GCA 602A; Toshiba, Nasu, Japan) in all 16 patients within a week of MR examination. Phenobarbital (5 mg/kg/d) was given to each patient for at least 5 days before scintigraphic examination. The neonates and infants had fasted for 3 hours before the examination. Cholescintigraphy was performed with intravenous administration of 99mTc disofenin in a dose of 0.25 mCi/kg (9.25 MBq/kg). Sequential anterior scintigrams of the abdomen were obtained at 1, 5, 15, and 30 minutes after injection and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours. Delayed images were obtained at 24 hours if there was still no visualization of bowel activity by 6 hours (11). The hepatic uptake of radiotracer, the depiction of the gallbladder, and the presence of activity in the bowel were observed on the serial scans within 6 hours and on a 24-hour–delay scan.

Image Analysis
All MR images were interpreted independently by three radiologists (Y.T.K., C.K.W., G.C.L.) who were experienced in abdominal MR imaging and were blinded to the clinical history and the results of other tests of the patients. The conspicuity or visibility of the common bile duct, common hepatic duct, gallbladder, cystic duct, and intrahepatic ducts was evaluated on the basis of the source and MIP-reformatted images. Discrepancies among observers were resolved by consensus.

For the patients with neonatal cholestasis, biliary atresia was excluded if there was visualization of a normal extrahepatic biliary system at MR cholangiography. In the patients with biliary atresia, MR findings were correlated with those found at surgery. The studies of the 10 control patients, who underwent MR imaging only, were interpreted in the same manner as those for the 16 jaundiced patients. The cholescintigraphic studies were interpreted in the same fashion as the MR images. The interpretation of the MR images and cholescintigraphic studies was separated by 1–2 weeks to prevent recall of the findings, and the patient order in which those two types of studies were interpreted was different.

Statistical Analysis
The McNemar exact test was used to compare the visibility of intrahepatic ducts between 2D turbo SE and 3D IR turbo SE images in five control pairs. The Student t test was used to evaluate the statistically significant difference in the mean gallbladder size between patients with neonatal hepatitis and those with biliary atresia. The Fisher exact test was used to test the significance of a small gallbladder on the MR cholangiogram in the differentiation of biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis. A P value of less than .05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
The gallbladder, common bile duct, common hepatic duct, and right and left hepatic ducts were visible in all 10 nonjaundiced neonates and infants, while the cystic duct was visible in six of the 10 nonjaundiced control subjects. The second-order intrahepatic ducts were visualized in only five control subjects (50%). The caliber of the common bile duct ranged from 2.0 to 3.5 mm (mean ± SD, 2.6 mm ± 0.5). The gallbladder was 2.2–4.6 cm in length (mean ± SD, 3.3 cm ± 0.9). In addition to 2D turbo SE images, 3D IR turbo SE images were also obtained in five of the 10 control neonates and infants. The 2D turbo SE images tended to depict more secondary branches of the intrahepatic ducts than did the 3D IR turbo SE images in these five control subjects, although the difference was not statistically significant (three of five vs one of five; McNemar exact test, P = .5) (Fig 2). An example of duct visibility in a 3-day-old control neonate is illustrated in Figure 3.



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. MR cholangiograms in a 3-month-old nonjaundiced male infant. S = stomach, D = duodenum. (a) T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) with 2D acquisition by using an MIP algorithm clearly depicts the gallbladder (GB), common bile duct (CBD), common hepatic duct (CHD), right and left hepatic ducts (RHD, LHD), and the second-order intrahepatic ducts (IHD). (b) T2-weighted IR turbo SE image (7,000/1,000 [effective]/50) with 3D acquisition by using an MIP algorithm shows the biliary structures up to the right and left hepatic ducts (RHD, LHD). The second-order intrahepatic duct is not visible. CBD = common bile duct, CHD = common hepatic duct, GB = gallbladder.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. MR cholangiograms in a 3-month-old nonjaundiced male infant. S = stomach, D = duodenum. (a) T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) with 2D acquisition by using an MIP algorithm clearly depicts the gallbladder (GB), common bile duct (CBD), common hepatic duct (CHD), right and left hepatic ducts (RHD, LHD), and the second-order intrahepatic ducts (IHD). (b) T2-weighted IR turbo SE image (7,000/1,000 [effective]/50) with 3D acquisition by using an MIP algorithm shows the biliary structures up to the right and left hepatic ducts (RHD, LHD). The second-order intrahepatic duct is not visible. CBD = common bile duct, CHD = common hepatic duct, GB = gallbladder.

 


View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. MR cholangiogram in a 3-day-old nonjaundiced male neonate. T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) in steep oblique projection shows the gallbladder (GB), cystic duct (CyD), common bile duct (CBD), common hepatic duct (CHD), and right and left hepatic ducts (RHD, LHD), but the second-order intrahepatic ducts are not shown. D = duodenum.

 
The Table lists the clinical data, various imaging findings, and the final diagnoses in the 16 patients with neonatal cholestasis. In the nine patients with neonatal hepatitis, the gallbladder, common bile duct, common hepatic duct, and right and left hepatic ducts were clearly depicted at MR cholangiography (Fig 4). The cystic duct was visible in five of the nine patients with neonatal hepatitis. In the infant with paucity of intrahepatic ducts, cholescintigraphy with 99mTc disofenin did not allow visualization of the gallbladder or of bowel activity, with retention of tracer in the liver up to 24 hours. However, MR cholangiography depicted the gallbladder, cystic duct, common bile duct, and common hepatic duct, and the hepatic ducts were faintly visible (Fig 5). The 3D IR turbo SE images were slightly inferior to the 2D turbo SE images in the depiction of the hepatic ducts in this patient.



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. MR cholangiogram in a 46-day-old female infant with neonatal hepatitis. T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) obtained from frontal projection shows clearly visible gallbladder (GB), common bile duct (CBD), common hepatic duct (CHD), and right and left hepatic ducts (RHD, LHD) and faintly visible second-order intrahepatic ducts (IHD). The pancreatic duct (PD) is also seen. D = duodenum.

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. MR cholangiogram in a 32-day-old female infant with paucity of intrahepatic ducts and infantile polycystic kidney disease. T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) obtained with steep oblique coronal projection depicts the gallbladder (GB), cystic duct (Cy D), and extrahepatic bile duct (arrows). Also seen is the enlarged right kidney (K) with small hyperintense cystic lesions.

 
In the six patients with surgically confirmed biliary atresia, no MR cholangiogram showed a visible common bile duct (Fig 6). The common hepatic duct was not depicted in five of these six patients and was cystic in another patient. The intrahepatic ducts were not visible at all in four of the six patients with biliary atresia and were only partially visible in two patients. All of the six patients but one had a small gallbladder, which was defined as less than 1.5 cm in length (12). The cystic duct was depicted in four of the six patients with biliary atresia. No obvious difference in duct conspicuity could be noted between the 2D turbo SE images and the 3D IR turbo SE images because the extrahepatic and intrahepatic ducts were not depicted in most of these patients.



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6a. MR cholangiograms in patients with biliary atresia. (a) Biliary atresia in a 32-day-old male infant (patient 1). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) obtained with coronal oblique projection shows an atrophic gallbladder (GB) and cystic duct (Cy D). The common bile duct, common hepatic duct, and intrahepatic ducts are not visible. B = bowel. (b) Biliary atresia in a 57-day-old female infant (patient 3). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) in coronal oblique projection demonstrates a normal gallbladder (GB) without visualization of the common bile duct or common hepatic duct. Only incomplete intrahepatic ducts (arrows) are visible. D = duodenum, S = stomach. (c) Biliary atresia in a 23-day-old male neonate (patient 6). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) in slightly oblique coronal projection shows cystic dilatation of the common hepatic duct (CHD), a small gallbladder (GB), and partially visible hepatic ducts (arrows). The common bile duct is not visible. B = bowel, D = duodenum, DB = duodenal bulb.

 


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6b. MR cholangiograms in patients with biliary atresia. (a) Biliary atresia in a 32-day-old male infant (patient 1). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) obtained with coronal oblique projection shows an atrophic gallbladder (GB) and cystic duct (Cy D). The common bile duct, common hepatic duct, and intrahepatic ducts are not visible. B = bowel. (b) Biliary atresia in a 57-day-old female infant (patient 3). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) in coronal oblique projection demonstrates a normal gallbladder (GB) without visualization of the common bile duct or common hepatic duct. Only incomplete intrahepatic ducts (arrows) are visible. D = duodenum, S = stomach. (c) Biliary atresia in a 23-day-old male neonate (patient 6). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) in slightly oblique coronal projection shows cystic dilatation of the common hepatic duct (CHD), a small gallbladder (GB), and partially visible hepatic ducts (arrows). The common bile duct is not visible. B = bowel, D = duodenum, DB = duodenal bulb.

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6c. MR cholangiograms in patients with biliary atresia. (a) Biliary atresia in a 32-day-old male infant (patient 1). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) obtained with coronal oblique projection shows an atrophic gallbladder (GB) and cystic duct (Cy D). The common bile duct, common hepatic duct, and intrahepatic ducts are not visible. B = bowel. (b) Biliary atresia in a 57-day-old female infant (patient 3). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) in coronal oblique projection demonstrates a normal gallbladder (GB) without visualization of the common bile duct or common hepatic duct. Only incomplete intrahepatic ducts (arrows) are visible. D = duodenum, S = stomach. (c) Biliary atresia in a 23-day-old male neonate (patient 6). T2-weighted turbo SE image (3,000/700 [effective]) in slightly oblique coronal projection shows cystic dilatation of the common hepatic duct (CHD), a small gallbladder (GB), and partially visible hepatic ducts (arrows). The common bile duct is not visible. B = bowel, D = duodenum, DB = duodenal bulb.

 
Patients with type A and type B biliary atresia had similar MR cholangiographic findings; that is, both groups had an invisible extrahepatic bile duct. In the patient with type C biliary atresia (patient 6), MR cholangiograms showed a cystic dilatation of the common hepatic duct, an accompanying atrophic gallbladder, and incomplete intrahepatic ducts but without visualization of the common bile duct (Fig 6c). In the two patients with type B biliary atresia, MR cholangiography failed to depict the extremely hypoplastic common bile duct, which was visible at surgical cholangiography with a caliber of less than 0.5 mm. On the basis of nonvisualization of the entire extrahepatic biliary tree, the authors were consistently correct in predicting biliary atresia as the cause of the jaundice.

The neonates and infants with neonatal hepatitis had gallbladders ranging from 1.4 to 4.5 cm in length (mean ± SD, 2.9 cm ± 0.9), while the gallbladders in the neonates and infants with biliary atresia were 0.8–2.1 cm in length (mean ± SD, 1.2 cm ± 0.4) (Student t test, t = 4.33, P < .001). MR cholangiography showed small gallbladders in all patients with biliary atresia except one and showed a small gallbladder in only one of the 10 patients without biliary atresia (Fisher exact probability test, P < .001). Thus, a small gallbladder could be considered highly suggestive but not diagnostic of biliary atresia. The diagnostic accuracy was 88% (14 of 16 patients), with a sensitivity of 83% (five of six patients), specificity of 90% (nine of 10 patients), and positive and negative predictive values of 83% (five of six patients) and 90% (nine of 10 patients), respectively.

Periportal fibrosis, as defined by the presence of increased T2 signal intensity on the T2-weighted conventional MR images, was seen in four of the six patients with biliary atresia (Fig 7) and in none of the nonjaundiced cohort and none of the patients with nonobstructive cholestasis. However, periportal thickening was hardly appreciable on MIP-reformatted MR cholangiographic images.



View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. MR cholangiogram in a 47-day-old female infant with biliary atresia (patient 2). Paracoronal T2-weighted, spectral presaturation with IR, turbo SE (1,650/80 [effective]) image shows marked periportal thickening (arrowheads).

 
The findings from cholescintigraphy with 99mTc disofenin in all of the neonates and infants with biliary atresia were nonvisualization of the gallbladder and of bowel activity by 24 hours. In the group of patients with neonatal hepatitis, the images showed both the gallbladder and bowel activity in three patients and showed bowel activity alone in three patients. In the remaining three patients with neonatal hepatitis, as well as the infant with paucity of intrahepatic ducts, neither the gallbladder nor bowel activity by 24 hours was visible. For the diagnosis of biliary atresia, the sensitivity was 100% (six of six patients), but the specificity was only 60% (six of 10 patients). The accuracy was 75% (12 of 16 patients), and the positive predictive value was 60% (six of 10 patients).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
This preliminary study shows that MR cholangiography in small infants can provide images of such diagnostic quality that the common bile and common hepatic ducts can be depicted clearly.

With these images, biliary atresia can be definitely excluded if the entire extrahepatic bile duct is visualized on the MR cholangiograms. If no complete extrahepatic bile duct can be visualized, especially when accompanied by an atrophic gallbladder, biliary atresia is suggested.

Biliary atresia and neonatal hepatitis are the two major causes of cholestatic jaundice in neonates and young infants (13). Biliary atresia was theorized to result from destructive inflammatory processes, leading to progressive fibrosis and obliteration of the extrahepatic bile duct (1). Patients with biliary atresia require an early surgical intervention, at best before 2 months of age (14). Many tests have been used to evaluate cholestasis in infants; however, none has proved infallible (9). A percutaneous liver biopsy has an extremely variable diagnostic accuracy of 60%–96.8% (9,13,15,16). Imaging studies, including ultrasonography, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, have been used to exclude biliary atresia as the cause of neonatal cholestasis (36,1720). Use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to view the biliary tree presents a challenge in infants because of the lumen-to-tube ratio (21). Although laparotomy with surgical cholangiography can provide a direct and definite diagnosis, it is undesirable if alternative techniques are available.

MR cholangiography has developed rapidly over the past few years. Promising results in adult biliary disorders have been well documented in the literature (2224). The feasibility and preliminary applications of MR cholangiography in neonates and infants have been mentioned in two recent articles (7,8). In our study, with the use of a non–breath-hold, respiratory-triggered, heavily T2-weighted, fat-suppressed, turbo SE technique, the main biliary structures were depicted in all control neonates and infants younger than 5 months of age. The second-order intrahepatic ducts could be visualized in half of the control group. This reflected that the resolution and quality of MR cholangiograms could ensure a clinical application for neonates and small infants.

The technique we used had several advantages: (a) higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios, which allow the use of thin sections, even for 2D imaging, and (b) diminished sensitivity to both motion artifact and slow flow (24). These advantages are mandatory for imaging neonates or small infants who have small-caliber biliary ducts and unavoidable motion. In addition, the respiratory-triggering technique allowed a non–breath-hold examination, which made imaging a baby possible.

These non–breath-hold fast SE techniques rely on an increase in signal acquisition (up to six signals acquired) to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and to compensate for signal losses caused by motion (25,26). The increase in the number of signals acquired, however, results in a long acquisition time, which should be minimized by choosing an adequate echo train length. Applying a surface coil instead of a body coil increases the signal-to-noise ratio and, therefore, improves visualization of small nondilated ducts (27). The addition of a fat-saturation technique has also improved the conspicuity of bile ducts from the surrounding intraabdominal fat while decreasing the motion artifacts associated with hyperintense subcutaneous fat (24).

In our control group, the 3D IR turbo SE images were slightly inferior to the 2D turbo SE images, especially in depicting the intrahepatic ducts. In the jaundiced cohort, 3D IR turbo SE imaging was performed only in the six patients with biliary atresia and the infant with paucity of intrahepatic ducts. Because none or only a few bile ducts were depicted in these patients, it is hard to compare these two sequences in the jaundiced group. In general, 3D IR turbo SE images proved to be slightly inferior in quality compared with the 2D turbo SE images. The increased motion artifacts caused by thin sections, the limitation of the number of signals acquired, and the long acquisition time degrade the visualization of the small-caliber intrahepatic ducts in small infants imaged with 3D IR turbo SE sequences. Because of the relatively higher quality and the shorter imaging time, we recommend 2D turbo SE sequences for MR cholangiographic study in small infants.

In this study, the extrahepatic bile ducts were visualized well in the nine patients with neonatal hepatitis and the infant with paucity of intrahepatic ducts. Biliary atresia was thereby excluded, and an unnecessary laparotomy was avoided in the four patients who had no evidence of hepatobiliary excretion at cholescintigraphy.

MR cholangiograms of all of the six patients with biliary atresia did not show the extrahepatic bile duct, except for one patient with cystic dilatation of the common hepatic duct. In the two patients with type B biliary atresia, a patent but very thin common bile duct with an atretic common hepatic duct was disclosed with surgical cholangiography. The lack of adequate water content in the hypoplastic common bile duct and its extremely small caliber (<0.5 mm) made it unable to be visualized on MR cholangiograms. Nevertheless, this did not affect the diagnosis of biliary atresia from a clinical point of view, nor did it have an influence on the choice of surgical procedures or the predicted outcome. In four patients with biliary atresia, MR cholangiograms also did not show the intrahepatic ducts. This was consistent with the surgical and histopathologic findings on the sections through the porta hepatis, which showed only a fibrous cord of the common hepatic duct and prominent fibrotic tissues with small bile ductules without normal structures of hepatic ducts.

Guibaud et al (7) have reported a false-positive diagnosis of biliary atresia in an infant with sclerosing cholangitis, in whom MR cholangiography did not depict the extrahepatic bile duct because of the small caliber of the ducts. Someday, with further improvements in the imaging resolution of MR cholangiography, visualization might be possible in cases such as that of the previous patient with sclerosing cholangitis and hypoplastic common bile ducts in type B biliary atresia. At such time, a reference to the normal caliber of the common bile duct (mean, 2.6 mm ± 0.5; range, 2.0–3.5 mm) will be necessary.

Guibaud et al (7) described periportal thickening on MR cholangiograms in all three of their patients with biliary atresia. Hyperintense periportal thickening was also found on T2-weighted MR images in our four patients with biliary atresia. However, periportal thickening was hardly appreciable on heavily T2-weighted MIP MR cholangiograms. The use of too heavily T2-weighted sequences and the MIP algorithm may suppress the signal intensity of periportal fibrosis.

Periportal thickening corresponded to the histologic findings of expansion of the portal tract by varying amounts of fibrosis, bile duct proliferation, and mixed inflammatory infiltrates (28). In the two patients with biliary atresia without MR findings of periportal thickening, no periportal fibrosis was noted at histopathologic examination of the specimen from liver biopsy. No periportal thickening was seen in our patients with nonobstructive cholestasis. This could be caused by the fact that progression of periportal fibrosis in intrahepatic cholestasis is not as prominent as that encountered in biliary atresia (29). Therefore, periportal thickening could also be a useful MR finding of biliary atresia. Larger prospective studies are required to determine the accuracy of periportal thickening in the diagnosis of biliary atresia.

In this prospective study of consecutive neonates and infants with neonatal cholestasis, the diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiography was 100% (16 of 16 patients), while the accuracy of cholescintigraphy with 99mTc disofenin for the diagnosis of biliary atresia was only 75%, with a specificity of only 60%. The results of our scintigraphic studies are consistent with those from previous reports, which have revealed excellent sensitivity but low specificity in depicting biliary atresia (35). The liver uptake and excretion of the 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals are affected by the serum bilirubin levels and hepatic function of the patients (30). Therefore, several other causes of neonatal cholestasis may produce findings on cholescintigrams similar to those of biliary atresia (ie, lack of visualization of the gallbladder and of bowel activity, with retention of tracer in the liver by 24 hours), decreasing the specificity of the findings.

Guibaud et al stated, "The conditions that mimic biliary atresia on scintigraphy will also mimic biliary atresia on MR cholangiography" (7, p 30). However, in the present study, MR cholangiography depicted the extrahepatic bile ducts in three patients with neonatal hepatitis and in the infant with paucity of intrahepatic ducts, all of whom showed neither the gallbladder nor bowel activity at cholescintigraphy. Unlike cholescintigraphy, MR cholangiography is not limited by serum bilirubin levels or the hepatic function of the patients.

MR cholangiography depicts fluid in the bile duct, rather than only bile. In healthy individuals, mucus-producing glands located in the deep layers of the extrahepatic bile ducts connect with the lumen by long ducts and secrete white viscous secretions (31). Although bile secretion is retarded in severe intrahepatic cholestasis, this white viscous secretion, together with that of the neck glands of the gallbladder, might contribute to the visualization of the extrahepatic bile ducts with MR cholangiography.

Several major drawbacks still need to be addressed. The spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio need to be improved. There are problems of motion induced by respiration, by bowel peristalsis, or especially by inadequate sedation, which is also the major cause of a failed examination. Appropriate sedation is mandatory. The presence of fluid within the regional gastrointestinal tract may obscure the bile ducts, although some fluid in the duodenum can serve as a good anatomic landmark. Adequate fasting or administration of negative contrast agents may reduce this bowel interference.

In conclusion, MR cholangiography can be used to depict the major biliary structures of neonates and small infants, and it can be used to accurately exclude biliary atresia as the cause of neonatal cholestasis by allowing visualization of the biliary tract. Further efforts are needed in improving the image resolution and in obtaining more clinical experience to investigate the accuracy of MR cholangiography in excluding biliary atresia.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: IR = inversion recovery MIP = maximum intensity projection SE = spin echo 2D = two-dimensional 3D = three-dimensional

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, T.S.J.; study concepts, T.S.J.; study design, T.S.J., Y.T.K.; definition of intellectual content, T.S.J.; literature research, T.S.J., Y.T.K.; clinical studies, T.S.J., S.H.C.; data acquisition, T.S.J., Y.T.K.; data analysis, T.S.J., Y.T.K., C.K.W., G.C.L.; statistical analysis, T.S.J.; manuscript preparation, T.S.J.; manuscript editing, T.S.J., G.C.L.; manuscript review, G.C.L.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Balistreri WF, Grand R, Hoofnagle JH, et al. Biliary atresia: current concepts and research directions—summary of a symposium. Hepatology 1996; 6:1682-1692.
  2. Ohi R, Hanamatsu M, Mochizuki I, Chiba T, Kasai M. Progress in the treatment of biliary atresia. World J Surg 1985; 9:285-293.[Medline]
  3. Gerhold JB, Klingensmith WC, Kuni CC, et al. Diagnosis of biliary atresia with radionuclide hepatobiliary imaging. Radiology 1983; 146:499-504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kirks DR, Coleman RE, Filstron HC, Rosenberg ER, Merten DF. An imaging approach to persistent neonatal jaundice. AJR 1984; 142:461-466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cox KL, Stadalnik RC, McGahan JP, Sanders K, Cannon RA, Ruebner BH. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy with technetium-99m disofenin in the evaluation of neo- natal cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1987; 6:885-891.[Medline]
  6. Ben-Hain S, Seabold JE, Kao SCS, Johnson J, Tran D, Brown BP. Utility of Tc-99m mebrofenin scintigraphy in the assessment of infantile jaundice. Clin Nucl Med 1995; 20:153-163.[Medline]
  7. Guibaud L, Lachaud A, Touraine R, et al. MR cholangiography in neonates and infants: feasibility and preliminary applications. AJR 1998; 170:27-31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Tsuchigame T, Takahashi M, Sera Y. Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children. AJR 1998; 170:33-37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lai MW, Chang MH, Hsu SH, et al. Differential diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary atresia from neonatal hepatitis: a prospective study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1994; 18:121-127.[Medline]
  10. Karrer FM, Raffensperger JG. Biliary atresia. In: Raffensperger JG, eds. Swenson's pediatric surgery. 5th ed. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange, 1990; 650.
  11. Nadel HR. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy in children. Semin Nucl Med 1996; 26:25-42.[Medline]
  12. McGahan JP, Phillips HE, Cox KL. Sonography of the normal pediatric gallbladder and biliary tract. Radiology 1982; 144:873-875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mowat AP, Psacharopoulos HT, Williams R. Extrahepatic biliary atresia versus neonatal hepatitis: review of 137 prospectively investigated infants. Arch Dis Child 1976; 51:763-770.[Abstract]
  14. Kasai M. Treatment of biliary atresia with special reference to hepatic portoenterostomy and its modifications. Prog Pediatr Surg 1974; 6:5-52.[Medline]
  15. Manolaki AG, Larcher VF, Mowat AP, Barrett JJ, Portmann B, Howard ER. The prelaparotomy diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary atresia. Arch Dis Child 1983; 58:591-594.[Abstract]
  16. Brough AJ, Bernstein J. Conjugated hyperbilirubinemia in early infancy: a reassessment of liver biopsy. Hum Pathol 1974; 3:507-516.
  17. Abramson SJ, Treves S, Teele RL. The infant with possible biliary atresia: evaluation by ultrasound and nuclear medicine. Pediatr Radiol 1982; 12:1-5.[Medline]
  18. Ikeda S, Sera Y, Akagi M. Serial ultrasonic examination to differentiate biliary atresia from neonatal hepatitis: special reference to change in size of the gallbladder. Eur J Pediatr 1989; 148:396-400.[Medline]
  19. Gurlrud M, Jaen D, Mendoza S, Plaz J, Torres P. ERCP in the diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary atresia. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:522-526.[Medline]
  20. Ohnuma N, Takahasi H, Tanabe M, Yoshida H, Iwai J. The role of ERCP in biliary atresia. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45:365-370.[Medline]
  21. Shirai Z, Toriya H, Maeshiro K, Ikeda S. The usefulness of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in infants and small children. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88:536-541.[Medline]
  22. Laurent G, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995; 197:109-115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chan YI, Chan ACW, Lam WWM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 200:85-89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR 1996; 166:1285-1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH, et al. Evaluation of a non–breath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995; 196:227-232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Reinhold C, Bret PM, Guibaud L, Barkun ANG. MR cholangiopancreatography: potential clinical applications. RadioGraphics 1996; 16:309-320.[Abstract]
  27. Takehara T, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 1994; 192:73-78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Park WH, Kim SP, Park KK, Choi SD, Lee HJ, Kwon KY. Electron microscopic study of the liver with biliary atresia and neonatal hepatitis. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31:367-374.[Medline]
  29. Shirahase I, Ooshima A, Tanaka K, et al. The slow progression of hepatic fibrosis in intrahepatic cholestasis as compared with extrahepatic biliary atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1995; 5:77-81.[Medline]
  30. Chervu LR, Nunn AD, Loberg MD. Radiopharmaceuticals for hepatobiliary imaging. Semin Nucl Med 1982; 9:5-17.
  31. Netter FH, Popper H, Cliffton EE. Normal anatomy of the liver, biliary tract and pancreas. In: Oppenheimer E, eds. The CIBA collection of medical illustrations. Vol 3, Digestive system. Part III. Liver, biliary tract and pancreas. 2nd ed. Summit, NJ: CIBA, 1979; 22.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. S. Kim, J.-E. Cheon, B. J. Youn, S.-Y. Yoo, W. Y. Kim, I.-O. Kim, K. M. Yeon, J. K. Seo, and K.-W. Park
Hepatic Arterial Diameter Measured with US: Adjunct for US Diagnosis of Biliary Atresia
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 549 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Ryeom, B. H. Choe, J. Y. Kim, S. Kwon, C. W. Ko, H. M. Kim, S. B. Lee, and D. S. Kang
Biliary Atresia: Feasibility of Mangafodipir Trisodium-enhanced MR Cholangiography for Evaluation
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 250 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
H E Woodley
Imaging of the jaundiced child
Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 301 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H.-J. Lee, S.-M. Lee, W.-H. Park, and S.-O. Choi
Objective Criteria of Triangular Cord Sign in Biliary Atresia on US Scans
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 395 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Can Computed Tomography Predict Functional Benefit from Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2001; 164(12): 2137 - 2138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M.-J. Kim, Y. N. Park, S. J. Han, C. S. Yoon, H. S. Yoo, E. H. Hwang, and K. S. Chung
Biliary Atresia in Neonates and Infants: Triangular Area of High Signal Intensity in the Porta Hepatis at T2-weighted MR Cholangiography with US and Histopathologic Correlation
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 395 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. I. Norton, R. B. Glass, D. Kogan, J. S. Lee, S. Emre, and B. L. Shneider
MR Cholangiography in the Evaluation of Neonatal Cholestasis: Initial Results
Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 687 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaw, T.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, C.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaw, T.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, C.-K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE