Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vande Berg, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Maldague, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vande Berg, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Maldague, B. E.
(Radiology. 1999;212:527-535.)
© RSNA, 1999


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Idiopathic Bone Marrow Edema Lesions of the Femoral Head: Predictive Value of MR Imaging Findings1

Bruno C. Vande Berg, MD, PhD, Jacques J. Malghem, MD, Frederic E. Lecouvet, MD, Jacques Jamart, MD and Baudouin E. Maldague, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Universite catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium (B.C.V.B., J.J.M., F.E.L., B.E.M.) and the Center for Biostatistics and Medical Documentation, Universite catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires de Mont Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium (J.J.). Received June 29, 1998; revision requested August 5; final revision received November 11; accepted February 22, 1999. Address reprint requests to B.C.V.B. (e-mail: vandeberg@rdgn.ucl.ac.be).


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of several subchondral magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features observed in bone marrow edema lesions of the femoral head and to determine their value for differentiation of irreversible from transient lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed MR images of 72 femoral head lesions in 42 men and 25 women (median age, 48 years) with equivocal radiographic findings and bone marrow edema seen at MR imaging (T1- and T2-weighted images in all patients and contrast material–enhanced T1-weighted images in 39 patients). Follow-up MR images showed 57 lesions to be transient and 15 to be irreversible. The presence and size of subtle subchondral features observed on initial MR images were compared for both types of lesion.

RESULTS: Lack of any additional subchondral change on T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images had 100% positive predictive value for transient lesions. For irreversible lesions, presence of a subchondral area of low signal intensity at least 4 mm thick or 12.5 mm long had positive predictive values of 85% and 73%, respectively, on T2-weighted images and 87% and 86%, respectively, on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images.

CONCLUSION: Careful assessment of subchondral changes enables confident differentiation between early irreversible lesions and transient bone marrow edema lesions.

Index terms: Alcohol, 443.869 • Bone marrow, edema, 443.499 • Hip, MR, 443.121411, 443.12143 • Hip, necrosis, 443.44 • Myeloma, 443.34 • Osteoporosis, 443.56 • Osteomalacia, 443.57 • Steroids, complications, 443.542


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging greatly contributes to the assessment of symptomatic hip joints when inconclusive radiographs have been obtained (1). One of most outstanding advantages of MR imaging is the ability to depict radiographically occult femoral head osteonecrosis (25).

Typically, femoral head osteonecrosis is characterized by a subchondral lesion of variable signal intensity that is demarcated from the surrounding tissue by a rim of low signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images and of low and high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images (2,3,610). This lesion pattern differs from the bone marrow edema pattern that is characterized by an ill-defined epiphyseal marrow area of low signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images and of intermediate to high signal intensity on T2-weighted images (1114). The bone marrow edema pattern is nonspecific and can be observed in association with several conditions, including transient osteoporosis (12,1517), transient bone marrow edema syndrome (12,13,16), and epiphyseal stress fracture (18,19). These conditions are self-limiting disorders that necessitate no specific therapy other than palliative measures.

Femoral head osteonecrosis occasionally manifests with the bone marrow edema pattern at MR imaging, with, however, no visible reactive interface between necrotic and viable tissue (3,12,2022). Therefore, when the bone marrow edema pattern is present in a femoral head, early differentiation between irreversible epiphyseal osteonecrosis and a spontaneously transient lesion is important to prevent overtreatment of spontaneously resolving lesions and reserve more aggressive therapy for lesions that are associated with a poor prognosis (1,13,14,2326).

On T2-weighted and contrast material–enhanced T1-weighted MR images of bone marrow edema lesions of the femoral head, several discrete features can occasionally be observed in the subchondral area of the femoral head (12,17,19,26). In hypothetical terms, assessment of the presence of these subchondral changes and precise determination of their spatial characteristics on MR images could help differentiate irreversible from transient epiphyseal lesions. We previously demonstrated the prognostic value of MR imaging in the setting of lesions of the femoral condyle (27), and we now address lesions of the femoral head that show the bone marrow edema pattern.

In January 1989, we started a prospective study that included all patients in whom MR imaging demonstrated the bone marrow edema pattern in the femoral head and in whom radiographs were inconclusive; these patients were treated conservatively and were followed up to determine the outcome of the lesions. Our aims were to compare irreversible and transient lesions for the frequency and extent of subchondral changes observed at MR imaging and to determine the features that most reliably enable differentiation between these lesions.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Patients
The study population consisted of 67 patients (42 men and 25 women; median age, 48 years; age range, 29–84 years) with a total of 72 lesions. Five patients had bilateral epiphyseal abnormalities that occurred simultaneously (n = 4) or successively (n = 1). Inclusion criteria were (a) spontaneous hip pain with no history of trauma or no clinical suspicion of inflammatory disorder, (b) normal or inconclusive radiographs, (c) an ill-defined area of low signal intensity involving the femoral head on T1-weighted MR images and intermediate to high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images, (d) no surgical treatment, and (e) available imaging proof of the outcome of the lesion. Patients with femoral head lesions with joint-space narrowing on conventional radiographs or cartilage lesions on MR images were excluded. Patients with lesions with a reactive interface on MR images also were excluded.

All patients underwent an initial MR study performed at our institution between January 1989 and January 1997. None of the patients had been referred for consultation. In addition, 10 other lesions (in 10 patients) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria at the onset of the disease were excluded from the current study because of the lack of definite imaging proof of lesion outcome. Of the 10 patients with no available imaging follow-up, seven, who were contacted by phone, reported no residual pain, and three were lost to follow-up.

Nine lesions occurred during or immediately after pregnancy. Other associated findings were frank, diffuse osteoporosis seen on conventional radiographs (n = 5); osteomalacia (n = 5); history of alcohol abuse (n = 5), steroid therapy (n = 4), or fluoride therapy (n = 1); renal transplantation (n = 5); chronic renal failure (n = 1); radiation therapy (n = 1); and untreated multiple myeloma (n = 2). Because all patients were not primarily evaluated for the presence of these conditions, we cannot verify the importance of the conditions in the pathogenesis of the lesions. In the other 34 patients (34 lesions), the medical history was unremarkable.

Conventional radiographs, including anteroposterior views of the pelvis and anteroposterior and lateral views of the symptomatic hips, showed either no abnormality (n = 22) or nonspecific findings, which were described as discrete subchondral sclerosis (n = 10), subchondral bone rarefaction (n = 25), or both (n = 15). Forty-seven patients had undergone technetium 99m bone scanning that consistently demonstrated increased isotope uptake in the femoral heads, which corresponded to the bone marrow edema pattern seen at MR imaging.

Initial MR Imaging
MR imaging was performed at a mean (±SD) of 9.7 weeks ± 6.4 (median interval, 8 weeks; range, 2–32 weeks) after the onset of symptoms by using a 1.5-T (56 lesions) or a 0.5-T (16 lesions) superconducting magnet (Gyroscan; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands).

After acquisition of sets of transverse T1-weighted scout MR images and comparative coronal T1-weighted MR images of both hips, coronal T1-weighted images of the symptomatic hips were systematically obtained by using a 40 x 20-cm supple receiver-only surface coil (Philips Medical Systems) wrapped around the symptomatic hip joint. In 57 lesions, sagittal T1-weighted images were obtained in a plane with approximately 10° of internal rotation with respect to the plane perpendicular to the femoral neck.

T1-weighted spin-echo MR images were obtained with the following parameters: 350–550/20–25 (repetition time msec/echo time msec), 14–20-cm field of view, 3.5–5.0-mm section thickness, 0.5-mm intersection gap, two to four signals acquired, and a 230 x 256 matrix.

T2-weighted spin-echo MR images also were obtained by using the surface coil. Coronal or sagittal images were obtained as necessary, depending on the topography of the marrow changes on the T1-weighted images. The sagittal plane was favored when femoral head changes predominated anteriorly or posteriorly, and the coronal plane was selected when the predominant area of involvement was the upper aspect of the femoral head. Both sagittal and coronal images were obtained in 21 lesions.

Fifty-four sets of sagittal and 39 sets of coronal T2-weighted spin-echo images were obtained with the following parameters: 2,000–2,500/100–120, 16–20-cm field of view, 4–5-mm section thickness, 0.5-mm intersection gap, one to two signals acquired, and a 180 x 256 matrix.

T1-weighted spin-echo MR images were obtained after administration of 0.1 mmol/kg gadoterate dimeglumine (Dotarem; Guerbet, Roissy, France) in 39 consecutive lesions observed between 1989 and 1993. In these patients, the technique and spatial parameters were identical to those used for nonenhanced T1-weighted sagittal (n = 29) or coronal (n = 32) MR imaging. At the time of the study, fat-saturated T1-weighted MR images were not available at our MR unit. The duration of the MR examination was 25–45 minutes.

Other sequences included T2*-weighted gradient-echo, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, fat-saturated fast spin-echo, intermediate-weighted, and T2-weighted imaging sequences. These sequences were performed in some patients during the study period, but the images were not included in the review process.

Patient Follow-up and Determination of Lesion Outcome
All patients were advised to reduce weight bearing by using two crutches and then one crutch during 3–5 weeks. Nonsteroid analgesics were prescribed. Patients were not confined to bed rest. All patients were informed of the prospective study and consented to undergo future MR or radiographic studies to determine lesion outcome. At the time of this study, our ethical committee did not mandate its approval for noninvasive diagnostic procedures of potential clinical importance, provided that informed consent had been obtained from the patients.

Follow-up imaging was performed regardless of whether symptoms persisted and continued for at least 24 months, unless either conventional radiographs showed typical osteonecrosis with epiphyseal collapse or MR images showed complete resolution of marrow abnormalities. A total of 111 follow-up MR studies were obtained, including 64 studies obtained within 6 months after the initial study, 24 obtained 6–12 months after the initial study, and 23 obtained more than 12 months after the initial study. Seven patients did not come to the scheduled follow-up MR examination but decided to undergo follow-up MR imaging during 1997, 15–72 months (mean, 46 months) after the initial study. Follow-up MR studies included sagittal and coronal T1-weighted images obtained with the same technical parameters as for the initial studies. Follow-up T2-weighted images were obtained when persistent abnormalities were present on T1-weighted images.

A lesion was considered to be transient if normal signal intensity was observed in the femoral head on follow-up T1-weighted MR images, with resolution of the abnormalities that had been seen on initial MR studies. A lesion was considered to be irreversible if typical osteonecrosis occurred or if residual changes were demonstrated at MR imaging after at least 2 years of follow-up.

Analysis of Initial MR Images
The 283 sets of initial MR images (129 sets of T1-weighted images, 93 sets of T2-weighted images, and 61 sets of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images) were reviewed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists (B.C.V.B., F.E.L.) who were unaware of patient name, age, and sex and of lesion outcome. Initial radiographs, bone scans, initial large-field-of-view comparative T1-weighted coronal MR images, and all follow-up imaging studies were not available. All sets of images from each case were reviewed separately from each other. To assess intraobserver reproducibility, one radiologist (B.C.V.B.) reviewed the 283 sets of images 6 months after initial analysis.

Bone marrow edema was a common MR imaging feature of all lesions, and no lesion manifested with the demarcation rim or reactive interface typical of avascular necrosis. Because of previously reported (12,17,19,26) additional subchondral findings, we studied three parameters to determine their prognostic significance: low-signal-intensity subchondral areas, epiphyseal lines, and contour deformities (Fig 1).



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic view of a coronal T2-weighted MR image of the proximal end of the femur depicts a subchondral area of low signal intensity (A), a thin line of low signal intensity (B), and a focal deformity of the epiphyseal contour (C), all within an ill-defined area of intermediate to high signal intensity suggestive of edema.

 
On all MR images, the following characteristics observed in the subchondral area of the involved femoral heads were determined: (a) the presence, length, and thickness of subchondral areas of low signal intensity immediately adjacent to subchondral bone; (b) the presence, length, and distance from subchondral bone of low-signal-intensity lines that coursed in the vicinity of and approximately parallel to the articular surface; and (c) subtle focal contour deformities of the subchondral bone plate. These deformities were graded with a four-point scale: grade of 0, absent; grade of 1, possible flattening; grade of 2, possible depression; or grade of 3, frank depression.

Measurements were performed on the images, which were printed on separate films with a 1.2–1.4 zoom factor, by using a 0.5-mm–graduated ruler. In addition, the extent of the ill-defined area of low signal intensity was determined on coronal T1-weighted MR images and was considered to involve either the epiphysis alone or both the epiphysis and the femoral neck. These subchondral changes are illustrated in Figures 25.



View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. MR images in a 43-year-old woman with left hip pain of 7 weeks duration. (a) Coronal T1-weighted (415/20) image of the left hip shows an ill-defined area of reduced signal intensity in the femoral head and neck (arrow). (b) Corresponding coronal T2-weighted image (2,200/120) shows increased signal intensity in the same area and a low signal intensity line (arrows). (c) Corresponding coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (415/20) image shows a homogeneous increase in signal intensity. A follow-up MR study obtained 11 months later (not shown), when the patient was asymptomatic, demonstrated normal epiphyseal marrow.

 


View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. MR images in a 43-year-old woman with left hip pain of 7 weeks duration. (a) Coronal T1-weighted (415/20) image of the left hip shows an ill-defined area of reduced signal intensity in the femoral head and neck (arrow). (b) Corresponding coronal T2-weighted image (2,200/120) shows increased signal intensity in the same area and a low signal intensity line (arrows). (c) Corresponding coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (415/20) image shows a homogeneous increase in signal intensity. A follow-up MR study obtained 11 months later (not shown), when the patient was asymptomatic, demonstrated normal epiphyseal marrow.

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2c. MR images in a 43-year-old woman with left hip pain of 7 weeks duration. (a) Coronal T1-weighted (415/20) image of the left hip shows an ill-defined area of reduced signal intensity in the femoral head and neck (arrow). (b) Corresponding coronal T2-weighted image (2,200/120) shows increased signal intensity in the same area and a low signal intensity line (arrows). (c) Corresponding coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (415/20) image shows a homogeneous increase in signal intensity. A follow-up MR study obtained 11 months later (not shown), when the patient was asymptomatic, demonstrated normal epiphyseal marrow.

 


View larger version (177K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. MR images in a 70-year-old woman with left hip pain of 12 weeks duration. (a) Coronal T1-weighted (510/22) image of the left hip shows an ill-defined area of low signal intensity in the femoral head and neck. (b) Sagittal T2-weighted image (2,200/120) shows intermediate to high signal intensity in the femoral head. A low-signal-intensity subchondral area (arrows) is depicted in the upper pole of the femoral head. This 2.5-mm-thick, 10-mm-long area is compatible with a transient lesion. Follow-up MR study obtained 6 months later (not shown) demonstrated complete resolution of femoral head marrow changes.

 


View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. MR images in a 70-year-old woman with left hip pain of 12 weeks duration. (a) Coronal T1-weighted (510/22) image of the left hip shows an ill-defined area of low signal intensity in the femoral head and neck. (b) Sagittal T2-weighted image (2,200/120) shows intermediate to high signal intensity in the femoral head. A low-signal-intensity subchondral area (arrows) is depicted in the upper pole of the femoral head. This 2.5-mm-thick, 10-mm-long area is compatible with a transient lesion. Follow-up MR study obtained 6 months later (not shown) demonstrated complete resolution of femoral head marrow changes.

 


View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4a. MR images in a 34-year-old man with right hip pain of 14 weeks duration. (a) Sagittal T1-weighted (450/20) image of the right hip shows an ill-defined area of low signal intensity in the femoral head. (b) Corresponding sagittal T2-weighted (2,100/120) image shows a 3-mm-thick, 12-mm-long area of low signal intensity (black arrows) adjacent to the subchondral bone plate. A grade 2 deformity of the subchondral bone plate (white arrow) is well depicted at the anterior aspect of the femoral head, with a 25-mm-long line of low signal intensity (arrowheads). (c) Corresponding sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (450/20) image better depicts the low-signal-intensity subchondral area (black arrows) and the epiphyseal deformity (white arrow). (d) Sagittal T1-weighted (415/20) image obtained 2 years later, when the patient was asymptomatic, demonstrates irreversibility of the lesion. A small subchondral area of low signal intensity (black arrow) is present at the upper pole of the femoral head, and minor residual changes can be seen at the anterior aspect of the epiphysis (white arrow).

 


View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4b. MR images in a 34-year-old man with right hip pain of 14 weeks duration. (a) Sagittal T1-weighted (450/20) image of the right hip shows an ill-defined area of low signal intensity in the femoral head. (b) Corresponding sagittal T2-weighted (2,100/120) image shows a 3-mm-thick, 12-mm-long area of low signal intensity (black arrows) adjacent to the subchondral bone plate. A grade 2 deformity of the subchondral bone plate (white arrow) is well depicted at the anterior aspect of the femoral head, with a 25-mm-long line of low signal intensity (arrowheads). (c) Corresponding sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (450/20) image better depicts the low-signal-intensity subchondral area (black arrows) and the epiphyseal deformity (white arrow). (d) Sagittal T1-weighted (415/20) image obtained 2 years later, when the patient was asymptomatic, demonstrates irreversibility of the lesion. A small subchondral area of low signal intensity (black arrow) is present at the upper pole of the femoral head, and minor residual changes can be seen at the anterior aspect of the epiphysis (white arrow).

 


View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4c. MR images in a 34-year-old man with right hip pain of 14 weeks duration. (a) Sagittal T1-weighted (450/20) image of the right hip shows an ill-defined area of low signal intensity in the femoral head. (b) Corresponding sagittal T2-weighted (2,100/120) image shows a 3-mm-thick, 12-mm-long area of low signal intensity (black arrows) adjacent to the subchondral bone plate. A grade 2 deformity of the subchondral bone plate (white arrow) is well depicted at the anterior aspect of the femoral head, with a 25-mm-long line of low signal intensity (arrowheads). (c) Corresponding sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (450/20) image better depicts the low-signal-intensity subchondral area (black arrows) and the epiphyseal deformity (white arrow). (d) Sagittal T1-weighted (415/20) image obtained 2 years later, when the patient was asymptomatic, demonstrates irreversibility of the lesion. A small subchondral area of low signal intensity (black arrow) is present at the upper pole of the femoral head, and minor residual changes can be seen at the anterior aspect of the epiphysis (white arrow).

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4d. MR images in a 34-year-old man with right hip pain of 14 weeks duration. (a) Sagittal T1-weighted (450/20) image of the right hip shows an ill-defined area of low signal intensity in the femoral head. (b) Corresponding sagittal T2-weighted (2,100/120) image shows a 3-mm-thick, 12-mm-long area of low signal intensity (black arrows) adjacent to the subchondral bone plate. A grade 2 deformity of the subchondral bone plate (white arrow) is well depicted at the anterior aspect of the femoral head, with a 25-mm-long line of low signal intensity (arrowheads). (c) Corresponding sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (450/20) image better depicts the low-signal-intensity subchondral area (black arrows) and the epiphyseal deformity (white arrow). (d) Sagittal T1-weighted (415/20) image obtained 2 years later, when the patient was asymptomatic, demonstrates irreversibility of the lesion. A small subchondral area of low signal intensity (black arrow) is present at the upper pole of the femoral head, and minor residual changes can be seen at the anterior aspect of the epiphysis (white arrow).

 


View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5a. MR images in a 62-year-old woman with right hip pain of 10 weeks duration. (a) Coronal T1-weighted (415/20) image of the right hip shows an ill-defined area of low signal intensity in the femoral head and neck and a subchondral area with a more pronounced decrease in signal intensity (arrow). (b) Sagittal T2-weighted (2,140/120) image shows increased signal intensity in the femoral head, with a 4-mm-thick, 20-mm-long area of low signal intensity (arrows) at the anterosuperior pole of the femoral head. Follow-up radiographs (not shown) demonstrated femoral head osteonecrosis with a subchondral bone fracture. Total hip replacement was performed 7 months later.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5b. MR images in a 62-year-old woman with right hip pain of 10 weeks duration. (a) Coronal T1-weighted (415/20) image of the right hip shows an ill-defined area of low signal intensity in the femoral head and neck and a subchondral area with a more pronounced decrease in signal intensity (arrow). (b) Sagittal T2-weighted (2,140/120) image shows increased signal intensity in the femoral head, with a 4-mm-thick, 20-mm-long area of low signal intensity (arrows) at the anterosuperior pole of the femoral head. Follow-up radiographs (not shown) demonstrated femoral head osteonecrosis with a subchondral bone fracture. Total hip replacement was performed 7 months later.

 
Statistical Analyses
Statistical comparisons were performed by using the {chi}2 test for independent categoric variables, the Student t test for numeric variables, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for ordinal variables. All tests were two tailed. A P value of less than .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

The ability of the statistically significant parameters to aid in differentiation of irreversible from transient lesions was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for qualitative parameters and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for quantitative measurements. ROC curves obtained for the length and the thickness of the subchondral low-signal-intensity component on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were constructed for both observers by using maximum likelihood estimation calculated with the LABROC 1 program (C. Metz, Chicago, Ill). Values measured by the first observer were used to calculate sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values.

Reproducibility of findings between observers was assessed with the {kappa} coefficient for categoric parameters and with correlation coefficients for numeric variables. In general, a {kappa} value of less than 0.4 represented a poor level of agreement; a {kappa} value of 0.41–0.60, fair agreement; a {kappa} value of 0.61–0.80, good agreement; and a {kappa} value of 0.81–1.00, excellent agreement (28). To study intra- and interobserver reproducibility, parameters derived from all sagittal and coronal images were used. To study the prognostic significance of MR parameters, the more elevated values from either the sagittal or the coronal images were used for statistical analysis.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Outcome of Femoral Head Lesions
In 57 lesions, normal epiphyseal signal intensity was seen on follow-up MR images. Of 50 lesions that were prospectively followed, 48 were healed within 12 months and two were healed within 24 months after acquisition of the initial study. The seven patients who did not come to the scheduled follow-up MR examination but who agreed to undergo follow-up MR imaging 15–72 months (mean, 46 months) after the initial study had normal findings at follow-up.

Fifteen lesions were irreversible. Nine lesions (in eight patients) showed epiphyseal collapse with a subchondral bone fracture on conventional radiographs after 2–18-month follow-up (mean, 6.3 months). Seven patients, each with one lesion, were treated with total hip replacement. Two lesions in the same patient were well tolerated 47 months after disease onset. Six other lesions (in six patients) showed small, residual subchondral changes at MR imaging but no definite signs of osteonecrosis on radiographs. These six lesions were well tolerated clinically, and none of these patients had undergone surgery at the time of this writing. These six lesions were followed with MR imaging (20 studies) for a mean of 41 months (range, 24–76 months) after the initial MR study.

Clinical and Radiographic Findings
There were no significant differences between the group of patients with irreversible lesions (n = 15) and the group with transient lesions (n = 57) in terms of sex, age, side of the lesion, and interval between the onset of symptoms and the time of initial MR imaging (Table 1). Sixteen (46%) of 35 transient lesions observed in men and 13 (59%) of 22 transient lesions observed in women involved the left femoral head. The frequencies of the different patterns of changes determined on radiographs (osteopenia, subchondral sclerosis, mixed osteopenia and sclerosis, and normal appearance) were not significantly different between the groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical Findings in Patients with Transient Lesions and Patients with Irreversible Lesions
 
Frequency of Additional Subchondral Changes on MR Images
On T1-weighted images, lack of additional subchondral changes and presence of low-signal-intensity subchondral areas, epiphyseal lines, and epiphyseal deformity, respectively, were observed in 21 (29%), 14 (19%), 32 (44%), and 32 (44%) of 72 lesions. On T2-weighted images, lack of subchondral changes and presence of low-signal-intensity subchondral areas, epiphyseal lines, and epiphyseal deformity, respectively, were observed in 24 (33%), 32 (44%), 21 (29%), and 37 (51%) of 72 lesions. On contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, these features were observed in seven (18%), 17 (44%), 21 (54%), and 21 (54%) of 39 lesions, respectively (Figs 25).

Frequency of Subchondral Changes in Irreversible and Transient Lesions
On T1-weighted images, there was no difference in the frequency of subchondral changes between irreversible and transient lesions, and the usefulness of T1-weighted images for help in predicting the outcome was not further studied. Lack of additional subchondral changes was significantly more frequent in transient lesions than in irreversible lesions on T2-weighted images (24 [42%] of 57 transient and none [0%] of 15 irreversible lesions; P < .001) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (seven [23%] of 30 transient and none [0%] of nine irreversible lesions; P < .001).

Low-signal-intensity subchondral areas (Figs 35) were significantly more frequent in irreversible than in transient lesions on T2-weighted images (15 [100%] of 15 irreversible and 17 [30%] of 57 transient lesions; P < .001) and on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (nine [100%] of nine irreversible and nine [29%] of 30 transient lesions; P < .001).

Epiphyseal deformities (Fig 4) were significantly more frequent in irreversible than in transient lesions on T2-weighted images (10 [66%] of 15 irreversible and 11 [19%] of 57 transient lesions; P = .002) and on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (nine [100%] of nine irreversible and eight [25%] of 30 transient lesions; P < .001).

Frequency of epiphyseal lines (Figs 2, 4) was not significantly different between irreversible and transient lesions on either T2-weighted (10 [66%] of 15 irreversible and 28 [49%] of 57 transient lesions) or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (six [66%] of nine irreversible and 15 [50%] of 30 transient lesions) images.

Prognostic Value of the Subchondral Changes on MR Images
Lack of subchondral changes.—Lack of additional subchondral changes on both T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images had excellent positive predictive value for the recognition of transient lesions (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values for the Lack of Subchondral Changes as an Indicator of Transient Lesions
 
Subchondral low-signal-intensity areas.—Presence of subchondral low-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images had excellent negative predictive value and poor positive predictive value for the recognition of irreversible lesions (Table 3). To discriminate irreversible from transient lesions, acceptable cutoff values for measurement of the subchondral low-signal-intensity component were a thickness of 4 mm or more (positive predictive value, 85% on T2-weighted and 87% on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images) and a length of 12.5 mm or more (positive predictive value, 73% on T2-weighted and 86% on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images) (Table 4). Areas under ROC curves were greater than 0.942 for measurements of the length and thickness on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (Table 5). Intra- and interobserver reproducibility for detection and measurement of the thickness of the subchondral low-signal-intensity area were greater than 0.842 (Table 6).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values for T2-weighted and Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging Findings Indicative of Irreversible Lesions
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values for Selected Cutoff Values for T2-weighted and Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging Findings Indicative of Irreversible Lesions
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Area under the ROC Curve for Measurements of Low-Signal-Intensity Areas and Importance of Epiphyseal Deformity as Indicators of Irreversible Lesions
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6. Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility for Detection and Measurement of Subchondral Changes on MR Images
 
Epiphyseal contour deformity.—Presence of epiphyseal deformity as an indicator of an irreversible lesion on either T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images had poor positive predictive value and satisfactory to excellent negative predictive value (Table 3). The importance of epiphyseal deformity was significantly different between irreversible and transient lesions, with discrete and frank deformities more frequent in irreversible than in transient lesions (P < .01). Areas under ROC curves for the degree of deformity were 0.788 on T2-weighted images and 0.925 on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (Table 5). The {kappa} coefficients for intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the degree of epiphyseal deformity were moderate (Table 6).

Epiphyseal lines.—Presence of epiphyseal lines had poor positive predictive value as an indicator of an irreversible lesion (Table 3). Length and distance of epiphyseal lines from the epiphyseal contour were not significantly different between transient and irreversible lesions.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Since the advent of MR imaging for evaluation of the symptomatic hip, the meaning of the diffuse pattern of abnormal marrow signal intensity has proved to be controversial (1,14). This abnormality is characterized by an ill-defined area of decreased signal intensity in the femoral head and neck on T1-weighted MR images and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. In this popularly known bone marrow edema pattern, there is no evidence of a reactive interface, which is considered to be specific for osteonecrosis (3,13). The bone marrow edema pattern has been described (3,12,13,1522) in association with a number of conditions, including transient osteoporosis of the hip, transient bone marrow edema syndrome, epiphyseal stress fracture, and epiphyseal osteonecrosis. The distinction between these conditions is crucial because of considerable differences in treatment and prognosis (1). Actually, the first three conditions are self limiting and resolve with conservative treatment. In contrast, epiphyseal osteonecrosis usually is not spontaneously reversible and can lead to epiphyseal collapse (2931).

In the current prospective study, the spontaneous outcome in 72 femoral head lesions that were not treated surgically and that showed the bone marrow edema pattern was determined by using serial imaging. The features observed at initial MR imaging in 57 transient lesions and 15 irreversible lesions were reviewed to determine whether initial MR studies enabled early differentiation of irreversible lesions from transient lesions.

The results of our study allowed us to draw the following conclusions. First, absence of additional subchondral changes other than the bone marrow edema pattern on T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images had excellent specificity and positive predictive value for transient lesions. Actually, all 24 (33%) lesions that showed no subchondral marrow changes other than the bone marrow edema pattern on T2-weighted images were found to be transient on follow-up MR studies. The transformation of a lesion that initially showed only the bone marrow edema pattern into an irreversible lesion was not observed in the current study.

Second, in about two-thirds of 72 bone marrow edema lesions, additional focal changes were depicted in the area adjacent to the subchondral bone plate on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images obtained with a small field of view. Actually, subchondral areas of low signal intensity, subtle deformity of the epiphyseal contours, and epiphyseal lines of low signal intensity were seen on T2-weighted images in 44%, 29%, and 52% of lesions, respectively. These three additional changes in signal intensity were observed in both transient and irreversible lesions. Subchondral low-signal-intensity areas and contour deformity, but not epiphyseal lines, were significantly more frequent in irreversible lesions than in transient lesions.

Finally, determination of the length and thickness of low-signal-intensity subchondral areas and of the importance of contour deformity on either T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images helped differentiate irreversible from transient lesions. The presence and extent of epiphyseal lines of low signal intensity, however, had poor prognostic value.

Subchondral areas of low signal intensity had the greatest prognostic importance. In our study, a low-signal-intensity subchondral area with a thickness of at least 4 mm on T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images had a positive predictive value of greater than 85% for prediction of lesion irreversibility. Similarly, a low-signal-intensity subchondral area with a length of at least 12.5 mm had a positive predictive value of greater than 73%. The {kappa} values were indicative of excellent reproducibility of the size measurements obtained with both types of images but were greater with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images than with T2-weighted images, probably because of better signal intensity contrast between epiphyseal marrow, subchondral changes, and articular cartilage on the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images.

The magnitude of epiphyseal contour deformity also helped with recognition of irreversible lesions, with frank deformity more frequently associated with irreversible lesions than with transient lesions. However, because reproducibility of the determination of the degree of deformity was fair, the value of this criterion warrants further assessment. Computed tomography is superior to MR imaging for demonstrating changes in the sphericity of the femoral head (32,33) and could be used to assess epiphyseal contours when findings of bone marrow edema lesions are equivocal.

MR imaging techniques, patient selection criteria, and outcome definitions used in the current study must be emphasized to avoid misinterpretation of our results. First, all images were obtained by using a surface coil and a small field of view. The higher spatial resolution achieved on these images than on large-field-of-view images could account for the high detection rate and good reproducibility of measurement of subchondral changes. It is possible that previously described (20) irreversible bone marrow edema lesions also had additional subchondral changes that were underestimated on the relatively low-resolution images obtained in the early era of MR imaging.

Second, we deliberately focused our investigation on ambiguous clinical and imaging conditions. Femoral head osteonecrosis lesions with obvious epiphyseal collapse seen on radiographs or with well-delimited marrow changes seen on MR images were not included in this study. Bone marrow edema lesions observed in association with joint-space narrowing on conventional radiographs or with cartilage lesions on MR images also were excluded. However, we did include 20 bone marrow edema lesions with radiographic features characteristic of transient osteoporosis of the hip. These lesions were included because focal osteopenia was rarely recognized by referring physicians and radiologists.

Finally, irreversible lesions did not systematically correspond to typical osteonecrosis, which was observed in nine of 15 irreversible lesions. The other six such lesions showed small residual subchondral signal intensity heterogeneities at MR imaging after a follow-up of 24–72 months. These small subchondral bone lesions were well tolerated clinically. A further study with a larger series of patients is needed to determine whether initial MR studies enable differentiation of lesions that will progress to typical osteonecrosis from relatively more benign lesions that will show only small residual changes at follow-up.

The fact that contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images helped differentiate irreversible from transient lesions does not imply that contrast material is necessary: Prognostic features depicted on T2-weighted images were similar to those observed on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Our initial experience with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images definitely helped by increasing confidence for detection of low-signal-intensity areas and focal deformities on T2-weighted images, because changes were often more conspicuous on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. In our current routine clinical practice, we reserve the performance of contrast-enhanced MR imaging for rare cases of equivocal findings on T2-weighted images. Furthermore, in our more recent experience, subchondral changes observed on standard T2-weighted spin-echo MR images also were well depicted on fast spin-echo T2-weighted and fat-saturated fast intermediate-weighted and T2-weighted images. These observations must be addressed in future studies.

The current study has several limitations inherent to the study design. First, implicit in the determination of a spontaneous lesion course is that no surgical intervention was performed. No correlation with histologic results can thus be provided. Results from previous studies (6,34,35) have demonstrated that subchondral areas of low signal intensity on either T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images correspond to bone and marrow necrosis. Our observation that the size of these subchondral low-signal-intensity areas was directly related to outcome supports those previous results. The bone marrow edema pattern in itself is nonspecific, and histologic findings (36,37) from biopsy specimens of bone marrow edema lesions have demonstrated a range of features, including immature fibrovascular tissue, interstitial edema, bone and marrow necrosis, and variable changes in the trabecular network. The prognostic importance of the finding of bone and marrow necrosis at microscopic examination remains to be assessed, because bone and marrow cell death is a sign observed not only in epiphyseal osteonecrosis (38) but also in fractures (39), degenerative disease (40,41), and transient osteoporosis (20, 37,42).

Second, the effect on lesion outcome of a decrease in physical activity, which was recommended to all patients, remains unknown. Early recognition of a lesion and a subsequent decrease in physical activity could have influenced lesion outcome.

Finally, we addressed intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the identification of features that were helpful for determination of the prognosis. As in any single-center study, reproducibility is biased due to the experience that is progressively acquired by the reviewers. A multicenter study is mandatory to validate our observations.

Results from the current study of idiopathic femoral head lesions that show the bone marrow edema pattern at MR imaging demonstrate that precise analysis of the subchondral marrow changes depicted on T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images helps differentiate irreversible lesions from transient lesions. Absence of subchondral low-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images is invariably indicative of a spontaneous favorable outcome with resolution of the lesions. Thickness and length of the subchondral areas of low signal intensity on T2-weighted or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images are the most important reproducible features for differentiation of irreversible lesions from transient lesions.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are greatly indebted to the clinicians at our institution who collaborated in this study, including the orthopedic surgeons A. Vincent, MD, J. J. Rombouts, MD, P. De Nayer, MD, and colleagues, and the rheumatologists J. P. Devogelaer, MD, D. Manicourt, MD, and colleagues. We also thank Patrick Schmitz, Benoit Dehon, Eric Ligot, Françoise Martin, and Martine Milecan for technical and secretarial support.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviation: ROC = receiver operating characteristic

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, B.C.V.B.; study concepts, B.E.M., J.J.M.; study design, B.C.V.B.; definition of intellectual content, B.C.V.B., J.J.M.; literature research, B.C.V.B.; clinical studies, B.C.V.B., J.J.M., F.E.L.; data acquisition, B.C.V.B., J.J.M., F.E.L.; data analysis, B.C.V.B., F.E.L.; statistical analysis, J.J.; manuscript preparation, B.C.V.B.; manuscript editing, B.C.V.B., J.J.M., B.E.M., F.E.L.; manuscript review, all authors.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Conway WF, Totty WG, McEnery KW. CT and MR imaging of the hip. Radiology 1996; 198:297-307.[Free Full Text]
  2. Totty WG, Murphy WA, Ganz WI, Kumar B, Daum WJ, Siegel BA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal and ischemic femoral head. AJR 1984; 143:1273-1280.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Mitchell DG, Rao VM, Dalinka MK, et al. Femoral head avascular necrosis: correlation of MR imaging, radiographic staging, radionuclide imaging, and clinical findings. Radiology 1987; 162:709-715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mitchell DG, Kressel HY, Arger PH, Dalinka M, Spritzer CE, Steinberg ME. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: morphologic assessment by MR imaging, with CT correlation. Radiology 1986; 161:739-742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mitchell MD, Kundel HL, Steinberg ME, Kressel HY, Alavi A, Axel L. Avascular necrosis of the hip: comparison of MR, CT, and scintigraphy. AJR 1986; 147:67-71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lang P, Jergesen HE, Moseley ME, Block JE, Chafetz NI, Genant HK. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: high-field-strength MR imaging with histologic correlation. Radiology 1988; 169:517-524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Beltran J, Herman LJ, Burk JM, et al. Femoral head avascular necrosis: MR imaging with clinical-pathologic and radionuclide correlation. Radiology 1988; 166:215-220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Markisz JA, Knowles RJ, Altchek DW, Schneider R, Whalen JP, Cahill PT. Segmental patterns of avascular necrosis of the femoral heads: early detection with MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 162:717-720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Coleman BG, Kressel HY, Dalinka MK, Scheibler ML, Burk DL, Cohen EK. Radiographically negative avascular necrosis: detection with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168:525-528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tervonen O, Mueller DM, Matteson EL, Velosa JA, Ginsburg WW, Ehman RL. Clinically occult avascular necrosis of the hip: prevalence in an asymptomatic population at risk. Radiology 1992; 182:845-847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Vogler JB, III, Murphy WA. Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 1988; 168:679-693.[Free Full Text]
  12. Vande Berg BC, Malghem JJ, Labaisse MA, Noel HM, Maldague BE. MR imaging of avascular necrosis and transient marrow edema of the femoral head. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:501-520.[Abstract]
  13. Hayes CW, Conway WF, Daniel WW. MR imaging of bone marrow edema pattern: transient osteoporosis, transient bone marrow edema syndrome, or osteonecrosis. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:1001-1011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Mitchell DG. Using MR imaging to probe the pathophysiology of osteonecrosis (editorial). Radiology 1989; 171:25-26.[Free Full Text]
  15. Bloem JL. Transient osteoporosis of the hip: MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 167:753-755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wilson AJ, Murphy WA, Hardy DC, Totty WG. Transient osteoporosis: transient bone marrow edema?. Radiology 1988; 167:757-760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Higer HP, Grimm J, Pedrosa P, Apel R, Bandilla K. Transitorische osteoporose oder femurkopfnekrose? frühdiagnose mit der MRT. ROFO 1989; 150:407-412.
  18. Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Goffin EJ, Duprez TP, Maldague BE. Transient epiphyseal lesions in renal transplant recipients: presumed insufficiency stress fractures. Radiology 1994; 191:403-407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rafii M, Mitnick H, Klug J, Firooznia H. Insufficiency fracture of the femoral head: MR imaging in three patients. AJR 1997; 168:159-163.[Abstract]
  20. Turner DA, Templeton AC, Selzer PM, Rosenberg AG, Petasnick JP. Femoral capital osteonecrosis: MR finding of diffuse marrow abnormalities without focal lesions. Radiology 1989; 171:135-140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Mitchell DG, Kressel HY. MR imaging of early avascular necrosis (letter). Radiology 1988; 169:281-282.[Free Full Text]
  22. Thickman D, Axel L, Kressel HY, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Skeletal Radiol 1986; 15:133-140.[Medline]
  23. Froberg PK, Braunstein EM, Buckwalter KA. Osteonecrosis, transient osteoporosis, and transient bone marrow edema: current concepts. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34:273-291.[Medline]
  24. Stutley JE, Conway WF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis and hips. Orthopedics 1994; 17:1053-1062.[Medline]
  25. MacDougall L, Conway WF. Controversies in magnetic resonance imaging of the hip. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 8:44-50.[Medline]
  26. Maldague BE, Vande Berg BC, Duprez TP, et al. Avascular necrosis, transient osteoporosis, and presumed stress fractures of the femoral head: imaging approach and differential diagnosis. In: Baert AL, Grenier P, Willi UV, Bloem JL, eds. Musculoskeletal imaging: an update. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1995; 45-56.
  27. Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Maldague BE, et al. Early irreversible osteonecrosis versus transient lesions of the femoral condyles: prognostic value of subchondral bone and marrow changes on MR imaging. AJR 1998; 170:71-77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.[Medline]
  29. Shimizu K, Moriya H, Akita T, Sakamoto M, Suguro T. Prediction of collapse with magnetic resonance imaging of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994; 76:215-223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Lafforgue P, Dahan E, Chagnaud C, Schiano A, Kasbarian M, Acquaviva PC. Early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head: MR imaging for prognosis in 31 cases with at least 2 years of follow-up. Radiology 1993; 187:199-204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Takatori Y, Kokubo T, Ninomiya S, Nakamura S, Morimoto S, Kusaba I. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: natural history and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993; 75:217-221.
  32. Magid D, Fishman EK, Scott WW, Jr, et al. Femoral head avascular necrosis: CT assessment with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology 1985; 157:751-756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lang P, Genant HK, Jergesen HE, Murray WR. Imaging of the hip joint: computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 1992; 274:135-153.
  34. Jergesen HE, Lang P, Moseley M, Genant HK. Histologic correlation in magnetic resonance imaging of femoral head osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop 1990; 253:150-163.
  35. Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Labaisse MA, Noel H, Maldague B. Avascular necrosis of the hip: comparison of contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced MR imaging with histologic correlation—work in progress. Radiology 1992; 182:445-450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Plenk H, Hofmann S, Eschberger J, et al. Histomorphology and bone morphometry of the bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip. Clin Orthop 1997; 334:73-84.
  37. Hofmann S, Engel A, Neuhold A, Leder K, Kramer J, Plenk H, Jr. Bone marrow oedema syndrome and transient osteoporosis of the hip: an MRI-controlled study of treatment by core decompression. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993; 75:210-216.
  38. Ficat RP. Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head: early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1985; 67:3-9.
  39. Lichtenstein L. Fractures and their sequelae. Diseases of bone and joints St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1970; 1-9.
  40. Ahuja SC, Bullough PG. Osteonecrosis of the knee: a clinicopathological study in twenty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978; 60:191-197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kiaer T, Pedersen NW, Kristensen KD, Starklint H. Intra-osseous pressure and oxygen tension in avascular necrosis and osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990; 72:1023-1030.
  42. Dunstan CR, Evans RA, Somers NM. Bone death in transient regional osteoporosis. Bone 1992; 13:161-165.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. V. Korompilias, A. H. Karantanas, M. G. Lykissas, and A. E. Beris
Transient Osteoporosis
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2008; 16(8): 480 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J Teh
Imaging the hip
Imaging, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 234 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Ito, T. Matsuno, and A. Minami
Relationship between bone marrow edema and development of symptoms in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1761 - 1770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
C Fang and J Teh
Imaging of the hip
Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G.-S. Huang, W. P. Chan, Y.-C. Chang, C.-Y. Chang, C.-Y. Chen, and J. S. Yu
MR Imaging of Bone Marrow Edema and Joint Effusion in Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Relationship to Pain
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 545 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. J. Mosher
Diagnostic Effectiveness of Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging in Evaluation of Abnormal Bone Marrow Signal
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 320 - 322.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. R. Hetzel, J. Malms, P. May, P. Heering, A. Voiculescu, U. Modder, and B. Grabensee
Post-transplant distal-limb bone-marrow oedema: MR imaging and therapeutic considerations
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 1859 - 1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow