Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, P. L.
(Radiology. 1999;213:429-437.)
© RSNA, 1999


Experimental Studies

Speckle Decorrelation Flow Measurement with B-Mode US of Contrast Agent Flow in a Phantom and in Rabbit Kidney1

Jonathan M. Rubin, MD, PhD, J. Brian Fowlkes, PhD, Theresa A. Tuthill, PhD, Aaron P. Moskalik, MSE, Richard T. Rhee, MS, Ronald S. Adler, MD, PhD 2, Sahira N. Kazanjian, MD and Paul L. Carson, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, University Hospital B1Dd 502/0030, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0553. Received October 1, 1998; revision requested December 10; revision received January 20, 1999; accepted February 8. Supported in part by a research gift from General Electric, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, DAMD 17-94-J-4144. Address reprint requests to J.M.R. (e-mail: jrubin@umich.edu).


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To use speckle decorrelation in the presence of ultrasonographic (US) contrast agent as an alternative flow measurement technique to Doppler US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vivo and in vitro studies were performed. A tube with flowing saline solution containing contrast agent was positioned horizontally across a US image. The amount of decorrelation between a series of images was recorded. The flow profile across the tube was generated by averaging the decorrelation values and was compared with a Doppler frequency shift image. In addition, B-mode images of six rabbit kidneys were obtained during and after intravenous injection of contrast agent. Images were analyzed to compute the correlation between successive points in time.

RESULTS: The velocity profiles across the tube were parabolic, with the fastest flow rates measured in the center of the tube. In the rabbit kidneys, measurements indicated the largest decorrelation rates occurred in the larger vessels. The cortical decorrelation rates were significantly slower than those for the hilar vessels (P < .05) and were relatively angle independent.

CONCLUSION: Decorrelation flow measurements can be used to estimate flow in vitro and in vivo similar to measurements obtained with Doppler US but with less angle dependence. These measurements could lead to a US perfusion technique.

Index terms: Blood, flow dynamics, 9*.12983, 9*.129883 • Blood vessels, US, 9*.12983, 9*.12988 • Ultrasound (US), contrast media, 9*.12988 • Ultrasound (US), Doppler studies, 9*.12983 • Ultrasound (US), experimental studies, 9*.12983, 9*.12988 • Ultrasound (US), physics, 9*.12983, 9*.12988 • Ultrasound (US), technology, 9*.12983, 9*.12988


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
A number of developments in recent years have related to the use of decorrelation of ultrasound signals in the measurement of blood flow. Because ultrasonography (US) is a coherent imaging method, the amplitude of the received ultrasound signal fluctuates as a result of the relative spatial arrangement of subresolution scatterers, which generate speckle. The phenomenon manifests in B-mode images as fluctuations in time of the amplitude of speckle and is also observed in Doppler US as fluctuations of the signal amplitude (1,2).

Decorrelation is caused by a change in the speckle pattern in a given sample volume determined by the dimensions of the ultrasound beam and the pulse length or the three-dimensional point spread function. Ideally, this speckle pattern change would be caused completely by fluid movement through the sample volume. If the point spread function is made spherically symmetric, the mean transit time should be nearly independent of flow direction; therefore, the decorrelation might be made angle independent. In any case, it is highly possible that this angle dependence is not as big an effect as the cosine dependence of Doppler.

Gray-scale speckle decorrelation also has been proposed and used to detect motion in B-mode imaging (2,3). In addition, speckle decorrelation has been used to monitor the motion of scan heads to produce three-dimensional US images without additional hardware requirements (47). In these techniques, the rate of speckle decorrelation is related to the velocity of the scan head in the elevational direction. For the detection of blood flow, the process is essentially inverted. The transducer is fixed in position, and the motion of blood at any given position in the scan plane will result in a fluctuation in the signal amplitude, which can be related to the velocity.

The complication is that the relative low backscatter coefficient for blood produces very little signal compared with that for soft tissue, with the subsequent low signal-to-noise ratio confounding earlier preliminary attempts to use this method (3). Yet even with these problems, the decorrelation of blood signal in normal B mode has been demonstrated by Bamber et al (3) by examining flow in the inferior vena cava. However, this may have been an especially good target because the backscatter of slowly moving (in the presence of low shear) venous blood is higher owing to rouleaux formation, which produces a relatively strong signal (812).

One possible solution that would make the B-mode techniques more universal is to use US bubble contrast agents to overcome some of these difficulties. The signal amplitude of blood should be sufficiently high in the presence of contrast agent, and the agent is not expected to experience rouleaux that might complicate the amplitude dependence of the backscatter. Decorrelation imaging with contrast agents could then combine the high spatial resolution and frame rate of B-mode imaging to provide the flow detection and velocity information of Doppler imaging.

The hypothesis behind the experiments described herein is that the speckle produced by the bubbles in the contrast agent will decorrelate as a function of velocity. We investigated this hypothesis in vitro by using flow tubes and in vivo in a rabbit kidney model with the hope that this measure could lead directly to a US perfusion estimate.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
In this study, we measured and displayed a property that we refer to as "decorrelation of speckle." This measure usually corresponds to a rate of loss of correlation, or how fast something loses its initial spatial relationship or memory of that relationship as defined in a stochastic differential equation (1,13). This rate constant typically requires some model of the system. To measure this property and for display purposes, a parameter that represents the rate of loss of correlation will display decorrelation. We use the correlation coefficient itself, where the lower the correlation coefficient is in any given time interval, the faster the decorrelation rate is. This works well in the qualitative gray-scale images. When a numeric value is ascribed to decorrelation, we define decorrelation as 1 - CN, where CN is the correlation coefficient as defined later. Hence, higher calculated decorrelation values during any time interval indicate faster decorrelation rates.

The time intervals we use are called "lags"; a lag is a frame-to-frame increment for which we assumed a stationary process. For example, the correlation between frames 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 4, and so on are referred to as one lag. Correlations based on frames 1 and 3, 2 and 4, 3 and 5, and so on are called two lags, and so forth.

In Vitro Experiments
To examine the relationship between decorrelation with contrast agents and flow velocity, measurements were performed on a flow system containing a 7.8-mm-diameter dialysis tube (Spectra/Por Type 2; Spectrum, Houston, Tex) at mean flow velocities of 0, 0.48, and 1.39 cm/sec (Fig 1). Mean flow velocities were measured on the basis of volume flow estimates by using a graduated cylinder. The zero flow data set was also obtained to determine how much decorrelation occurs merely in the presence of bubbles. A tube was chosen to produce laminar flow with a well-known parabolic flow profile, which provided a variety of known velocities on one image. A bubble trap was used to collect any large bubbles that appeared during filling, and it served as a "capacitor" to eliminate the pulsatility of the peristaltic pump that was used. The contrast agent, lipid-stabilized perfluorocarbon-filled microbubbles (MRX-115; ImaRx Pharmaceutical, Tucson, Ariz), was diluted one part to 105 with saline solution for circulation. A 10-MHz linear array on a US scanner (VST; Diasonics, Milipitas, Calif) was used to image perpendicular to the flow direction of the contrast agent, with the output power of the scanner turned down 10 dB to reduce bubble attrition and acoustic radiation force due to the ultrasound beam.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic shows experimental system for measurements in a controlled flow condition. Contrast agent was drawn from the reservoir and pumped through the remaining flow loop via a peristaltic pump. Imaging of the 7.8-mm-diameter dialysis tubing was performed in a water tank with a sound absorber in the bottom.

 
At each flow velocity, 30 images were gathered at a frame rate of 43 Hz and digitally stored from the cine loop. A Doppler frequency shift image also was obtained by means of steering the beam. These images were then analyzed on a workstation (Alphastation 500; Digital, Maynard, Mass) by using code written for AVS/Express (AVS, Waltham, Mass). The B-mode images were first decompressed to a linear scale by using compression curves provided by Diasonics. From these decompressed values, the autocovariance, or unnormalized autocorrelation, Cx0,y0, of the different time lags was computed by means of the following algorithm:

where t is the frame number, x,y designates the pixels centered at x0,y0, I is the intensity at that position, I is the mean intensity over the window, lag is the number of frames between images being compared, max_lag is the largest lag computed, and N is the total number of frames in the data set.

The autocovariance values for each pixel were computed over a user-defined spatial window (the first summation) centered on the current pixel, and each lag was normalized by the zeroth lag or variance that generated a correlation coefficient, CN. The spatial window used was 21 x 5 pixels, with the longer dimension oriented along the flow direction. The correlation coefficient is a number between -1 and 1, which is then sign inverted and scaled from 0 to 255 for purposes of display. Thus, a high correlation coefficient, CN = 1, corresponds to 0, and a negative correlation coefficient, CN = -1, corresponds to 255. In this way, a decorrelation image is produced for each time lag, and the higher the decorrelation is, the whiter the gray value is. As mentioned earlier, this inverted gray-scale display provides a means to image a relative, qualitative decorrelation map. We used it because it could easily be assigned to the 0 to 255 gray-scale distribution.

The flow profile across the tube was generated by averaging the decorrelation values along the length of the tube, which reduced the two-dimensional image to a one-dimensional profile with the percentage of decorrelation calculated as 1 - CN. Similarly, averaging of the frequency shift values along the length of the tube was performed for comparison. Doppler images from the horizontal tube were obtained by using the beam steering of the US unit.

In Vivo Experiments
Initial animal trials were designed to demonstrate the variation of decorrelation rates in the kidney. We performed experiments in six adult female New Zealand albino rabbits (Kuiper Rabbit Ranch, Gary, Ind) that weighed 2.0–3.7 kg and that were anesthetized with either xylazine hydrochloride (Rompun [10 mg per kilogram of body weight injected subcutaneously]; Mobay, Shawnee, Kan) and ketamine hydrochloride (Ketaset [50 mg/kg injected intramuscularly]; Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, Iowa) or isoflurane (Isosol [1.5%–2.0% inhalation with O2]; Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Rochester, NY). MRX-115 was administered through the ear vein catheter, either as a 50 µL/kg bolus or diluted in 10 mL of saline solution and infused at 1 mL/min. Images were then obtained and processed with either one of two methods outlined later to detect motion associated with the bubbles. At the conclusion of the experiment, the rabbits were killed, according to approved protocols, with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (Beuthanasia-D; Schering-Plough Animal Health, Kenilworth, NJ) injected intravenously while they were still anesthetized. The experiments were conducted in an ethical and humane fashion, and experimental design was approved by the University of Michigan's committee on use and care of animals in accordance with U.S. government guidelines.

The set of in vivo images for the first rabbit was processed in 5 x 5-pixel regions of interest, as opposed to the 21 x 5-pixel region of interest for ex vivo experiments. This was done to maintain reasonable spatial resolution for this initial trial. Also, by using a standard algorithm in the AVS software package, an in-plane two-dimensional cross-correlation was performed between adjacent frames to correct for respiratory motion prior to the decorrelation calculation. A region of the image that enclosed the kidney was used to determine the relative axial and lateral shift necessary to maximally align the individual images in these two directions. The residual decorrelation was assumed to be due to flow, although soft-tissue motion in the elevational direction could contribute. The volume data were adjusted for the axial and lateral motion, and then a decorrelation rate was measured over the time series.

The group of image regions of interest were analyzed to compute the correlation between successive regions of interest in time: region of interest 1 correlation to region of interest 2, region of interest 2 correlation to region of interest 3, and so on for a one-step correlation value at each image location. As mentioned earlier, this is referred to as the first time lag correlation. The process is repeated for two lag correlations, three lag correlations, and so on.

The remaining in vivo studies, in five rabbits, were performed with a US scanner (Logiq 700; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis), and images were processed for decorrelation in a slightly different manner. We used a 739 (GE Medical Systems) linear array probe that scanned at 9 MHz. The probe was attached to an external frame that held the probe in a fixed position on the rabbit's body during the experiments. Either the right or left kidney was imaged, depending on access. We scanned with no frame averaging and the lowest power output possible. Gray-scale images were stored on cine loop at 30 frames per second during the time in which the level of contrast agent had reached a steady state. Then a 4-second segment was copied to the machine's hard disk for storage and later processing.

Portions of the time series during which the rabbit was stationary without respiratory motion (nominally half-second intervals) were segmented out for analysis. For each pixel in the first frame, the temporal autocovariance was computed and normalized by means of the variance to produce a correlation coefficient as noted earlier. A mean correlation function was computed for all the stationary time segments, which formed a lag array with values ranging from 1 to -1 for each pixel. For each lag, a corresponding image can be formed and displayed by scaling the correlation value from 0 to 255 as described earlier. Again, rapidly decorrelating pixels will appear bright, whereas slowly decorrelating pixels are dark.

In the cortex, blood flows largely radially, and consequently a full range of angles between flow direction and the ultrasound beam is present in a single scan (14, 15). Hence, the normal kidney anatomy presents an opportunity to evaluate in vivo the angle dependence of the decorrelation technique. This can be done by examining the decorrelation rates in the cortex region of the lag 1 images. A semiautomatic segmentation algorithm was used to select the kidney cortex. The lag image was first smoothed with a 15 x 15-pixel Hamming window. A binary mask was then formed to eliminate quickly decorrelating pixels associated with major blood vessels. On the basis of the histogram of the smoothed lag image, the 5% lowest decorrelation values were masked out. A second mask was then applied to isolate the cortex. The outline of the kidney was hand selected on the basis of the original B scan, and a morphologic operator, "shrink," was applied to form a strip approximately 25 pixels wide, which corresponded to the cortex. The intersection of the two masks formed the final binary cortex mask.

To examine the decorrelation angle dependence without computing vectors normal to the kidney border, we devised a simpler projection technique. The cortex mask was overlayed on the lag image, and the mean correlation value was computed along columns one pixel wide (pixel width = 105 µm). If the velocity estimate based on decorrelation is angle dependent, the resultant plot should show progressively higher correlation averages as one approaches the upper and lower poles where the blood flow is perpendicular to the beam. This is because the speckle will remain correlated longer if the decorrelation is slower (ie, similar to Doppler angle dependence). If there were no angle dependence, the average correlation values for these columns across the kidney would be perfectly flat.

Statistical comparisons between cortical and hilar vascular decorrelation rates were performed by using a two-tailed Student t test. A P value less than .05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Figure 2 shows an image of the US contrast agent flowing in the tube flow system. The concentration of contrast agent is sufficiently high in this circumstance so that speckle is seen in the tube and not individual bubbles (the bubbles are typically less than 6 µm in diameter). Figure 2a is the imaging of the contrast agent by using normal color Doppler flow techniques. This result can then be compared with the flow image obtained by using decorrelation (Fig 2b). Note that in both cases, the brightest gray-scale values and the yellowish tones tend to be toward the middle of the flow, which corresponds to the fastest flow, and slower flows are seen near the walls of the tube. In this case, decorrelation appears to have higher contrast.



View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. US images of the flow of contrast agent in the dialysis tube. (a) US image of the flow of contrast agent in the dialysis tube as detected by means of color Doppler flow by using beam steering. (b) Lag 2 US image of same flow as in a obtained by using speckle decorrelation. The image was made from B-mode data and is displayed in gray scale, since there is no directional information in the decorrelation image. The whiter the pixel is, the greater the decorrelation rate is. Because this is a flow tube, one could make local velocity measurements because the flow direction is known a priori.

 


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. US images of the flow of contrast agent in the dialysis tube. (a) US image of the flow of contrast agent in the dialysis tube as detected by means of color Doppler flow by using beam steering. (b) Lag 2 US image of same flow as in a obtained by using speckle decorrelation. The image was made from B-mode data and is displayed in gray scale, since there is no directional information in the decorrelation image. The whiter the pixel is, the greater the decorrelation rate is. Because this is a flow tube, one could make local velocity measurements because the flow direction is known a priori.

 
The flow profile across the tube was generated by averaging the decorrelation values along the length of the tube, which reduced the two-dimensional image to a one-dimensional profile (Fig 3a). The profile was also estimated from the Doppler frequency shift image (Fig 3b) for comparison. Note that the amount of decorrelation increases with successive lags, although the proportion to the time difference between lags is somewhat incorrect; for example, the peak velocity has decorrelation values of 30, 75, and 105 instead of the expected 30, 60, and 90, assuming the first value of 30 is absolute. This is probably owing to increased dephasing in the central voxels as the velocity increases (see Discussion). Note the overall appearance of the parabolic flow profile in both cases. Slow flows with mean velocity as low as 0.48 cm/sec were detected, although no effort was made to determine the slowest detectable flow. The decorrelation of the slowest flow tested was four to five times faster than the decorrelation in the no-flow case (Fig 4), which indicates that there is a reasonable resistance to the effects of acoustic radiation pressure, brownian motion, and bubble destruction.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. (a) Graph shows the decorrelation profile averaged along the length of the flow tube. The flow rate is 0.48 cm/sec. Note the parabolic profile of the flow with the fastest decorrelation, which occurs in the middle of the tube at approximately the position of pixel 80. The amount of decorrelation also increases for successive lags. Decorrelation is defined here as 1 - CN. (b) Graph shows the Doppler shift profile averaged across the tube for comparison with a. The flow rate is 0.48 cm/sec, and the pulse repetition frequency is 100 Hz.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. (a) Graph shows the decorrelation profile averaged along the length of the flow tube. The flow rate is 0.48 cm/sec. Note the parabolic profile of the flow with the fastest decorrelation, which occurs in the middle of the tube at approximately the position of pixel 80. The amount of decorrelation also increases for successive lags. Decorrelation is defined here as 1 - CN. (b) Graph shows the Doppler shift profile averaged across the tube for comparison with a. The flow rate is 0.48 cm/sec, and the pulse repetition frequency is 100 Hz.

 


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Graph shows the decorrelation values for the no-flow condition in the tube. Note that there is a gradual decorrelation of the signal; however, the magnitude at lags 1-3 is quite small compared with the lags presented in Figure 3a. Again decorrelation is defined as 1 - CN. Note that on lag 14, the center of the tube has a decorrelation value of more than 100%. This can happen when the speckle in a pixel becomes almost totally decorrelated. The statistical fluctuations around zero correlation are then seen.

 
Figure 5 shows the SD in the flow profile measurements. Whereas the decorrelation measurement appeared relatively well behaved near the tube wall (Fig 5a), the Doppler SD (Fig 5b) shows a large error at the edges where the velocity starts to fall below the wall filter and the velocity gradient is high (a 100-Hz pulse repetition frequency was used to detect flow). Hence, each voxel may contain many velocities thereby increasing the SD. The most important point is that the detection of flow by means of decorrelation of the B mode is that the images presented are made with flow perpendicular to the propagation direction of the ultrasound field, which is a condition that would normally produce little or no Doppler shift. It may then be possible to create a condition in which the measurement can be made angle independent unlike the conditions with Doppler.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5a. (a) Graph shows the SD of the pixel values for decorrelation as averaged in Figure 3a. The flow rate is 0.48 cm/sec. Compare with b. (b) Graph shows the SD of the pixel values for the Doppler shift as averaged in Figure 3b. The flow rate is 0.48 cm/sec, and the pulse repetition frequency is 100 Hz. Note the large values near the walls in b and the relative absence of same in a.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5b. (a) Graph shows the SD of the pixel values for decorrelation as averaged in Figure 3a. The flow rate is 0.48 cm/sec. Compare with b. (b) Graph shows the SD of the pixel values for the Doppler shift as averaged in Figure 3b. The flow rate is 0.48 cm/sec, and the pulse repetition frequency is 100 Hz. Note the large values near the walls in b and the relative absence of same in a.

 
Figure 6 shows the result for the initial rabbit kidney experiment in which the 5 x 5-pixel technique was used. Figure 6a shows the appearance of the contrast agent in the kidney in a single B-mode image. The concentration of the agent for this experiment provided little B-mode enhancement, although higher concentrations do. Figure 6b was produced by taking the decorrelation of the first time lag. Note the appearance of the major vessels in the kidney and the initial appearance of the renal cortex. The limited time resolution due to the frame rate of the scanner restricts the selection of time points in the measurement. Figure 6c is the result of the third lag, and now the renal cortex signal has increased dramatically as sufficient time has elapsed for decorrelation of the signal from the slower moving blood. Eventually, all of the flow is displayed with a uniform gray because the signals have all fully decorrelated. To give an idea of how this information might appear color coded, Figure 6d combines the information of all three images—static tissues are coded blue, faster flows are coded green, and slower flows are coded red. Note that these images were made in vivo where global motion shifts due to respiratory motion were also corrected by using similar correlation methods.



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6a. US images of a rabbit's kidney during administration of contrast agent. (a) Normal B-mode US image of the kidney. Note the relative absence of contrast agent signal in the low-concentration conditions. The image is relatively dark to demonstrate the lack of effect of the contrast agent. (b) Lag 1 US image of decorrelation in which gray scale is displayed from dark to light with increasing decorrelation. Note the appearance of the larger kidney vessels (arrows) and the beginning appearance of the renal cortex (arrowheads). (c) Lag 3 US image of decorrelation. The renal cortex has decorrelated further at this later point. (d) Composite US image in which the original B-mode, a, is displayed in blue; lag 1, b, is displayed in green; and lag 3, c, is displayed in red.

 


View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6b. US images of a rabbit's kidney during administration of contrast agent. (a) Normal B-mode US image of the kidney. Note the relative absence of contrast agent signal in the low-concentration conditions. The image is relatively dark to demonstrate the lack of effect of the contrast agent. (b) Lag 1 US image of decorrelation in which gray scale is displayed from dark to light with increasing decorrelation. Note the appearance of the larger kidney vessels (arrows) and the beginning appearance of the renal cortex (arrowheads). (c) Lag 3 US image of decorrelation. The renal cortex has decorrelated further at this later point. (d) Composite US image in which the original B-mode, a, is displayed in blue; lag 1, b, is displayed in green; and lag 3, c, is displayed in red.

 


View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6c. US images of a rabbit's kidney during administration of contrast agent. (a) Normal B-mode US image of the kidney. Note the relative absence of contrast agent signal in the low-concentration conditions. The image is relatively dark to demonstrate the lack of effect of the contrast agent. (b) Lag 1 US image of decorrelation in which gray scale is displayed from dark to light with increasing decorrelation. Note the appearance of the larger kidney vessels (arrows) and the beginning appearance of the renal cortex (arrowheads). (c) Lag 3 US image of decorrelation. The renal cortex has decorrelated further at this later point. (d) Composite US image in which the original B-mode, a, is displayed in blue; lag 1, b, is displayed in green; and lag 3, c, is displayed in red.

 


View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6d. US images of a rabbit's kidney during administration of contrast agent. (a) Normal B-mode US image of the kidney. Note the relative absence of contrast agent signal in the low-concentration conditions. The image is relatively dark to demonstrate the lack of effect of the contrast agent. (b) Lag 1 US image of decorrelation in which gray scale is displayed from dark to light with increasing decorrelation. Note the appearance of the larger kidney vessels (arrows) and the beginning appearance of the renal cortex (arrowheads). (c) Lag 3 US image of decorrelation. The renal cortex has decorrelated further at this later point. (d) Composite US image in which the original B-mode, a, is displayed in blue; lag 1, b, is displayed in green; and lag 3, c, is displayed in red.

 
The mean decorrelation rates between the cortices and the hilar vessels are shown for the last five rabbits (Table 1). The decorrelation rates between the two were statistically significant (P < .05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Relative Rates of Decorrelation between Rabbit Cortices and Hilar Vessels
 
The horizontally projected average decorrelation in the kidney showed minor cusps on the edges of the cortex (Fig 7). The maximum deviation from the mean was 27% on average for the five rabbit kidneys scanned with the Logiq 700 unit, with the largest maximum deviation equal to 40%. The distribution of these measurements is shown in Table 2.



View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7a. (a) Lag 1 US image of rabbit kidney with cortical boundary enclosed by using the algorithm described in the text. (b) Graph shows the average lag 1 residual correlations for the renal cortex for columns drawn through the kidney. For this kidney, the average cortical lag 1 correlation was 0.35 with a maximum deviation of 0.12. The lower the residual correlation value is, the more rapid the decorrelation is.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7b. (a) Lag 1 US image of rabbit kidney with cortical boundary enclosed by using the algorithm described in the text. (b) Graph shows the average lag 1 residual correlations for the renal cortex for columns drawn through the kidney. For this kidney, the average cortical lag 1 correlation was 0.35 with a maximum deviation of 0.12. The lower the residual correlation value is, the more rapid the decorrelation is.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. First Lag Residual Correlations and Maximum Variations across Rabbit Kidneys
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Dymling et al (16) proposed the development of a more sensitive US measurement of blood flow and possible perfusion estimate in which the zeroth and first moments of the backscattered Doppler power spectrum have been shown to provide an estimate of flow in a randomly oriented microvascular bed. The use of the integrated backscattered power spectrum for the Doppler signal is made simpler now by the existence of an imaging mode on US scanners that color encodes this information in a real-time display. The relationships between decorrelation of Doppler power and flow velocity have been demonstrated previously (1,17). However, limitations exist in Doppler detection of slow flow and angle dependence.

The results presented indicate that the use of US gray-scale speckle decorrelation with bubble contrast agents may be useful for measuring blood flow in vivo. The results for the tube experiment show that the anticipated parabolic flow profile is realized and corresponds to the Doppler flow measurement. In the case of the decorrelation technique, measurements were made with the flow perpendicular to the ultrasound propagation direction, which is a limitation in Doppler flow imaging. In addition, decorrelation with contrast agents can be used to detect very low flows. In our study, the flow tube measurements were performed at a pulse repetition frequency of 100, which would generally be much too slow for in vivo detection owing to the associated slow frame rates and problems with soft-tissue motion.

Although not investigated in these experiments, the potential exists for decorrelation measures to be made angle independent by adapting the point spread function of the imaging beam to create uniform decorrelation rates in all three dimensions. If so, the angle dependence of the measure should be minimal. There is, however, recent evidence that decorrelation is angle dependent to some degree (18), and this angle dependence will have to be compensated for if this is to be an advantage over Doppler sampling. As noted earlier, at least in this study, the angle dependence appears to be relatively small compared with standard Doppler angle dependence; and there is clearly detectable flow at all angles, whereas Doppler is well known to lose signal at 90°, with an expected decrease in frequency shift of 50% at 60°. Measurements of the beam profile for our GE 739 linear array scanner head for the ratio of axial to lateral beam widths in the focal zone is about 50% (T.A.T., personal observations). This is very similar to our maximum deviation measurement.

The method used to generate a symmetric sample volume would be straightforward. By increasing the pulse length (ie, narrowing the bandwidth of the transmission), it would be possible to degrade the axial resolution and thus approach the lateral and elevational resolutions. If the lateral resolution needed to be compromised to approximate the elevational focusing, this could be accomplished by decreasing the aperture. Thus, it would be possible to approach an isotropic sample volume. As lateral and especially elevational focusing improves with one-and-a-half- and two-dimensional arrays, the amount of bandwidth narrowing and aperture reduction would become less and less with time. Further, it should be noted that the amount of bandwidth narrowing, especially in the region of best elevational focus, required here might still be less than that used in standard color Doppler flow in which the bandwidth is narrowed enough to clearly degrade the spatial resolution of color pixels. This is why the color pixels are much larger than gray-scale pixels in standard color Doppler flow images.

It is worth noting that decorrelation provides no directional information in general. As noted in flow phantom experiments, velocity information can be obtained with a priori knowledge of the flow direction (1). However, speckle decorrelation can be used only to estimate the rate at which material moves through a sampling site, an advantage of which is the ability to measure the flow through the ultrasound beam in any direction. Thus, the measure is in some sense three-dimensional, since it is influenced by and measures flow in all directions. In addition, in many cases directional information is not the important quantity, such as in perfusion, in which the inverse of the decorrelation rate would correspond to the mean transit time through the tissue (1).

Mean transit time is a highly sought-after quantity of flow, and estimating it usually requires a technique involving the administration of a bolus of contrast agent (19,20). Boluses have the well-known problems of spreading and distortion, which can severely complicate estimates of mean transit time. A method, such as speckle decorrelation, for easily estimating mean transit time without requiring a bolus of contrast agent is hence attractive. Further, once an estimate of mean transit time has been obtained, one needs only an estimate of the amount of blood in tissue to have a perfusion measure. Techniques for making such estimates of fractional moving blood volume have already been proposed (21,22). These measurements have been limited by rouleaux formation by red blood cells, which is a problem that does not arise with contrast agents.

The initial animal experiments presented indicate that the decorrelation rate of contrast agents scales with speed: larger hilar vessels decorrelate faster than the renal cortex (Table 1) (P < .05). We use speed here, since no directional information is obtained. This would imply that a measurement potential exists, but it remains to be determined if the actual speed can be extracted. As noted, decorrelation did not scale perfectly with velocity in the flow tube. This was almost certainly owing to the changing shape of the velocity profile with increasing flow. As the flow increases, the profile becomes steeper across the tube—the velocity gradient across the flow increases. This increased gradient means that each voxel contains more than one velocity component. These components will dephase within each voxel over time and cause the speckle to decorrelate before it actually leaves the voxel being imaged. Thus, the detected decorrelation rate will cause overestimation of the speed. This effect will be less pronounced in small vessels in which perfusion measurements are of greatest interest.

Other causes of signal dephasing such as bubble destruction could also confound any use of decorrelation times as a perfusion measure. Contrast agents can be destroyed by ultrasound fields of the types used in medical imaging (23). Decorrelation may also be influenced by such effects as bubble oscillations, translation due to acoustic radiation force, and brownian motion within the sample volume. Decorrelation would cause misinterpretation of these as bulk flow. If this method becomes clinically useful, bubbles with very stable shells will be useful.

Our preliminary results here suggest that, at least in flow tube experiments, bubble destruction and translation due to radiation forces are small contributors to decorrelation compared with true flow, at least at the pressure amplitudes used here (Fig 4). Further, it is worth noting that when the speckle in a pixel becomes nearly fully decorrelated, the calculated decorrelation begins to show a statistical fluctuation around total decorrelation or, equivalently, fluctuations around a correlation coefficient of zero. Hence, it is possible to obtain small negative correlations (ie, decorrelation values of more than 100%, as shown in Figure 4). Such problems would be easy to avoid in practice by either measuring a decorrelation rate to some nonzero value, such CN of 50%, as we did in Table 1, or with faster gray-scale sampling, by fitting the decorrelation curve with an exponential or Gaussian curve and using the calculated time constant as the decorrelation rate (1,5).

One curious effect was the axisymmetric decorrelation noted in the tube when there was no flow (Fig 4). At first glance, one would expect a more uniform distribution, although there is never any flow at the walls. We are not certain of the cause of this phenomenon. Although the pump was turned off at the time of this measurement, we cannot guarantee that there was absolutely no flow, particularly at this very low level. Further, there may be very small oscillations in the system that would manifest in this way. Although this plot looks like it shows laminar flow, there is really no directional information displayed here, so periodic oscillations would look just like this. Structured decorrelation in a flow tube such as this is an important issue to resolve. The decorrelation rates in Figure 4 are much lower than those caused by even the very slow flow rates we studied, however, and these results suggest that random bubble motions and destruction need not seriously degrade decorrelation measurements made in flow liquids.

It should be mentioned that this method is fundamentally different than the well-known speckle tracking and two-time correlation techniques used for blood velocity measurements (2426). In those methods, spatial or temporal correlations on reflected signals are performed to try to map the displacement of moving targets such as red blood cells to estimate their velocities. A reference is moved in typically either one or two dimensions to try to track the new location of the scatterers that produced the reference. In the decorrelation method, there is no tracking involved. All one does is estimate the rate of change of the scattering intensity at given positions during the sampling period. It is, in some sense, a much simpler process.

Practical application: Although still in the experimental stage, speckle decorrelation flow measurements could lead to a perfusion measurement in tissue, a highly sought-after parameter. The speckle decorrelation rate is directly related to the mean transit time in tissue, which is one-half of the perfusion measure, and by using US contrast agents, this measure now appears to be obtainable. The advantages of speckle decorrelation over standard administration of a bolus of contrast agent and the Doppler method for estimating mean transit time include that it is relatively angle independent compared with Doppler, it is inherently a three-dimensional measurement, and it can be performed by using continuous infusions of contrast agent. In addition, the use of contrast agents has the benefit of improving the fractional blood volume measurement, the other half of a perfusion estimate, by removing the effects of rouleaux.


    Footnotes
 
J.M.R. is the recipient of a research grant from General Electric. J.M.R., J.B.F., and P.L.C. have a GE Logiq 700 US scanner consigned to them for research purposes.

2 Current address: Hospital of Special Surgery, New York, NY. Back

9*. Vascular system, location unspecified. Back

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, J.M.R., J.B.F.; study concepts, J.M.R., J.B.F., R.S.A., P.L.C.; study design, J.M.R., J.B.F., A.P.M.; definition of intellectual content, J.M.R., J.B.F.; literature research, J.M.R., J.B.F.; experimental studies, J.M.R., J.B.F., R.T.R., S.N.K.; data acquisition, J.M.R., J.B.F., R.T.R., S.N.K.; data analysis, J.M.R., J.B.F., T.A.T., A.P.M.; statistical analysis, J.M.R., J.B.F., T.A.T., A.P.M.; manuscript preparation, J.M.R., J.B.F.; manuscript editing, J.M.R., J.B.F., T.A.T., R.S.A.; manuscript review, J.M.R., J.B.F., T.A.T., R.S.A., P.L.C.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Adler RS, Rubin JM, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL, Pallister JE. Ultrasonic estimation of tissue perfusion: a stochastic approach. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21:493-500.[Medline]
  2. Atkinson P, Berry MV. Random noise in ultrasonic echoes diffracted by blood. J Phys A Math Nucl Gen 1974; 7:1293-1302.
  3. Bamber J, Hasan P, Cook-Martin G, Bush N. Parametric imaging of tissue shear and flow using B-scan decorrelation rate (abstr). J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7(suppl):S135.
  4. Fowlkes JB, Carson PL, Moskalik A, Chen JF, Rubin JM, inventors. Method and apparatus for composition and display of three-dimensional image from two-dimensional ultrasound. International patent pending W097/00482. 1996; :.
  5. Chen J, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL, Rubin JM. Determination of scan-plane motion using speckle decorrelation: theoretical considerations and initial test. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 1996; 8:38-44.
  6. Li M, Siemens Corp. inventor, assignee. System and method for 3-D medical imaging using 2-D scan data. US Patent 5 582 173. December 10, 1996; :.
  7. Tuthill TA, Krücker JF, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL. Automated three-dimensional US frame positioning computed from elevational speckle decorrelation. Radiology 1998; 209:575-582.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cloutier G, Qin Z. Ultrasound backscattering from non-aggregating and aggregating erythrocytes: a review. Biorheology 1997; 34:443-470.[Medline]
  9. Sigel B, Machi J, Beitler J, Justin J. Red cell aggregation as a cause of blood-flow echogenicity. Radiology 1983; 148:799-802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Shung K, Cloutier G, Lim C. The effects of hematocrit, shear rate, and turbulence on ultrasound Doppler spectrum from blood. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992; 39:462-469.[Medline]
  11. Shung K. In vitro experiment results on ultrasonic scattering in biological tissues. In: Shung K, Thieme G, eds. Ultrasonic scattering in biological tissues. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC, 1993; 291-312.
  12. Shung K, Kuo I, Cloutier G. Ultrasound scattering properties of blood. In: Roelandt J, Gussenhoven E, Born N, eds. Intravascular ultrasound. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1993; 119-139.
  13. Papoulis A. Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1965; 515-524.
  14. Heptinstall R. Pathology of the kidney. 2nd ed Boston, Mass: Little, Brown, 1974; 1-50.
  15. Rubin JM, Carson PL, Meyer CR. Anisotropic ultrasonic backscatter from the renal cortex. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14:507-511.[Medline]
  16. Dymling SO, Persson HW, Hertz CH. Measurement of blood perfusion in tissue using Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17:433-444.[Medline]
  17. Chen J, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL, Rubin JM, Adler RS. Auto-correlation of integrated power Doppler signals and its application. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22:1053-1057.[Medline]
  18. Friemel BH, Bohs LN, Nightingale KR, Trahey GE. Speckle decorrelation due to two-dimensional flow gradients. IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics Frequency Control 1998; 45:317-327.[Medline]
  19. Axel L. Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: a theoretical analysis. Radiology 1980; 137:679-686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954; 6:731-744.[Free Full Text]
  21. Rubin JM, Adler RS, Fowlkes JB, et al. Fractional moving blood volume: estimation with power Doppler US. Radiology 1995; 197:183-190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rubin JM, Bude RO, Fowlkes JB, Spratt RS, Carson PL, Adler RS. Normalizing fractional moving blood volume estimates with power Doppler US: defining a stable intravascular point with the cumulative power distribution function. Radiology 1997; 205:757-765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Porter T, Xie F, Li S, D'Sa A, Rafter P. Increased ultrasound contrast and decreased microbubble destruction rates using triggered ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9:599-605.[Medline]
  24. Bonnefous O, Pesque P. Time domain formulation of pulse-Doppler ultrasound and velocity estimation by cross-correlation. Ultrason Imaging 1986; 8:73-85.[Medline]
  25. Bohs LN, Trahey GE. A novel method for angle independent ultrasonic imaging of blood flow and tissue motion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991; 38:280-286.[Medline]
  26. Bohs LN, Friemel BH, McDermott BA, Trahey GE. A real time system for quantifying and displaying two-dimensional velocities using ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19:751-761.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, P. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE