|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Received February 24, 1999; revision requested April 28; revision received May 25; accepted August 23. Address reprint requests to B.A.B. (e-mail: birnbaum@rad.upenn.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Index terms: Abdomen, CT, 70.12115 Colon, abnormalities, 752.795 Colon, infarction, 752.799 Colon, ischemia, 752.799
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We recently encountered two patients with isolated cecal infarction in whom computed tomographic (CT) findings were used to prospectively suggest this diagnosis. The purpose of this report is to describe the CT findings of isolated cecal infarction, which, to the best of our knowledge, have not been previously described in the radiology literature.
| Case Reports |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patient underwent helical CT (HiSpeed Advantage; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) of the abdomen and pelvis, performed after intravenous and oral administration of iothalamate meglumine (Conray 60; Mallinckrodt Medical, St Louis, Mo) and diatrizoate meglumine (Gastroview; Mallinckrodt Medical), respectively. Prospective image acquisition was performed through the right lower quadrant by using 5-mm-thick sections. Helical pitch was 1:1 with contiguous section reconstruction (no overlapping images). CT demonstrated the presence of a mobile cecum arising from the pelvis, with associated circumferential cecal wall thickening and pneumatosis coli isolated to the cecal caput (Fig 1). A presumptive CT diagnosis of cecal infarction was established.
|
Case 2
A 67-year-old obese woman with a history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and insulin-dependent type II diabetes mellitus presented at our emergency department complaining of nausea, diarrhea, and 24 hours of epigastric and right upper quadrant pain. Physical examination results revealed mild to moderate epigastric tenderness. Laboratory values, including white blood cell count, liver function test results, and serum amylase and lipase levels were normal. Conventional radiography of the abdomen showed no evidence of intestinal obstruction or pneumoperitoneum. A nuclear medicine cholescintigraphic study showed no evidence of cholecystitis. The patient's symptoms improved with administration of aluminum hydroxidemagnesium hydroxide compound (Maalox; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Collegeville, Pa) and simethicone, and she was discharged with a presumptive diagnosis of acute gastritis.
The patient returned to the emergency department the following day complaining of new periumbilical and right lower quadrant pain, anorexia, and mild diarrhea. She now had a low-grade fever of 38°C and peripheral leukocytosis (12,400 white blood cells per cubic millimeter). Physical examination results revealed moderate right lower quadrant tenderness without peritoneal signs. Repeat conventional radiographs of the abdomen were normal. The patient underwent helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis performed with intravenous and oral administration of iohexol (Omnipaque 300; Nycomed Amersham, Princeton, NJ) and diatrizoate meglumine, respectively. Prospective image acquisition was performed through the right lower quadrant by using 5-mm-thick sections. Helical pitch was 1:1 with contiguous data reconstruction. CT demonstrated circumferential mural thickening of the cecum, with a "target sign" enhancement pattern, mild pericecal inflammatory stranding, and a normal appendix (Fig 2). A presumptive diagnosis of focal cecal ischemia or inflammation was established.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolated cecal infarction is a rare entity. It has been reported to occur spontaneously and in association with chronic heart disease (5), cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (6), systemic chemotherapy (7), cholesterol embolization (11,12), and aortitis syndrome (13). It has been postulated (5,13) that isolated cecal ischemia may occur because the ileocecal region is a "watershed area," similar to the splenic flexure and rectosigmoid colon. In an attempt to understand why the cecum may be vulnerable to ischemia, it is necessary to review the blood supply to the cecum, appendix, and adjacent intestinal segments.
The ascending colon receives its blood supply from the superior mesenteric artery via the right colic artery, middle colic artery, the colic branch of the ileocolic artery, and anastomoses between these vessels (14). The terminal ileum is supplied directly from the ileal branch of the ileocolic artery and anastomoses with vessels supplying adjacent small-bowel segments. The appendicular arteries may originate from the colic branch of the ileocolic artery, the ileocolic arcade, or the anterior or posterior cecal arteries; however, they most commonly arise from the ileal branch of the ileocolic artery, which may then communicate with ileal branches of the superior mesenteric artery (5,14).
In contrast to the potential dual blood supply serving the ileum, appendix, and ascending colon, the cecum is supplied by end arteries, which may render this bowel segment more susceptible to ischemia. This is the basis for the watershed theory proposed by Rist et al (5), who attempted to explain isolated cecal necrosis in three patients with compensated chronic heart disease. The cecum is supplied by the anterior and posterior cecal arteries, which are terminal branches of the ileocolic artery (5,14). These end arteries may arise from either the ileal or colic branch of the ileocolic artery or from an inconstant arcade that may form between these vessels (Fig 3). The presence of an ileocolic vascular arcade may play an important role in the prevention of cecal ischemia because it enables anastomoses to form with adjacent intestinal segments. If the anterior and posterior cecal arteries do not originate from a vascular arcade, the cecal blood supply may be relatively deficient in comparison with that of the adjacent intestinal segments, which usually have a dual blood supply.
|
|
Like most cases of colonic ischemia, the exact precipitating event in our two cases of isolated cecal infarction remains unclear. Because both patients had diabetes, small vessel disease may have been a contributing factor. Chronic arteriosclerotic heart disease was documented in the second patient, but there was no evidence of arrhythmia or decompensated heart failure. Weakly positive results from an antiphospholipid antibody assay were obtained in this patient, which raised the possibility that she may have had a hypercoagulable state. Histopathologic specimens in both patients showed no evidence of atheromatous embolization. Neither patient underwent preoperative angiography; therefore, we are uncertain whether they had vascular anatomic structures that may have predisposed them to watershed infarction of the cecum.
The CT findings of bowel ischemia include circumferential bowel wall thickening, thumbprinting, intramural hemorrhage, focal or diffuse bowel dilatation, mesenteric arterial thrombus, engorged mesentery, pneumatosis intestinalis, portal or mesenteric venous gas, and pneumoperitoneum (1618). Circumferential bowel wall thickening is the most sensitive finding, but it is nonspecific. Air in the mesenteric vessels, especially when associated with intramural air, is the most specific CT sign of bowel ischemia (18).
Both of these patients demonstrated CT evidence of circumferential mural thickening of the cecum. Pneumatosis coli isolated to the cecal caput was identified in the first patient, and this was strongly suggestive of a diagnosis of cecal ischemia or infarction. Identification of cecal pneumatosis was straightforward in this patient because intramural air was present in a circumferential pattern. Recognition of right-sided pneumatosis may sometimes be difficult, because an admixture of fecal contents may occasionally produce a pseudopneumatosis appearance of the cecum and ascending colon. A mural stratification pattern consisting of a target sign in the cecum was present in the second patient. This finding is nonspecific and reflects the presence of submucosal edema in the bowel wall. In the clinical setting of acute right lower quadrant pain, the differential diagnosis for cecal wall thickening with a target sign includes cecal ischemia, cecal diverticulitis, cecal infection, neutropenic cecitis, Crohn disease, and appendicitis with secondary inflammation of the cecum.
In summary, isolated cecal infarction is a rare entity that may have multiple causes. Cecal ischemia should be included in the differential diagnosis when a patient presents with acute right lower quadrant pain, particularly if the patient is elderly or has predisposing risk factors (eg, vasculitis, small vessel disease, or a hypercoagulable state). The diagnosis is strongly suggested if CT demonstrates cecal wall thickening with isolated pneumatosis coli. Radiologists should be aware of the entity of cecal infarction because they may be the first to alert the clinician to the presence of this unusual, potentially life-threatening cause of acute right lower quadrant pain.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Mancuso, Y. Y. Cheung, A. M. Silas, J. D. Chertoff, and K. W. Dickey Case 120: Ischemic Colitis Limited to the Cecum Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 919 - 922. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hoeffel, M. D. Crema, A. Belkacem, L. Azizi, M. Lewin, L. Arrive, and J.-M. Tubiana Multi-Detector Row CT: Spectrum of Diseases Involving the Ileocecal Area RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1373 - 1390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Xiong, K. N. Chintapalli, G. D. Dodd III, S. Chopra, J. A. Pastrano, C. Hill, J. R. Leyendecker, R. M. Abbott, D. Grayson, and J. Feig Frequency and CT Patterns of Bowel Wall Thickening Proximal to Cancer of the Colon Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 905 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wiesner, B. Khurana, H. Ji, and P. R. Ros CT of Acute Bowel Ischemia Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 635 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |