|
|
||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (T.P., G.M.F., S.K.M.) and Surgery (S.K.M.), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 3324 Infirmary CB 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, and the Department of Radiology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Bombay, India (T.P., S.P., A.M.). Received February 24, 1999; revision requested April 5; revision received June 3; accepted August 10. Address reprint requests to S.K.M. (e-mail: suresh@med.unc.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Index terms: Fetus, abnormalities, 856.313, 856.8258, 856.8741, 856.879, 856.91 Retroperitoneal space, CT, 87.12111, 87.12112 Retroperitoneal space, diseases, 87.313
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The exact embryogenesis of fetus in fetu is controversial. Some investigators propose that fetus in fetu occurs from the anomalous embryogenesis in a diamniotic monochorionic twin pregnancy in which a malformed monozygotic twin lies within the body of its fellow twin (1). Others consider it to represent a highly organized teratoma.
This condition has a 2:1 male predominance, with most patients presenting with an abdominal mass in the 1st year of life. Other reported locations include the cranial cavity and the scrotum (3,4). The number of fetuses in fetu is usually single; however, multiple fetuses in fetu have been reported (5). The intent of this case report is to describe the characteristic computed tomographic (CT) findings of this unusual entity.
| Case Reports |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis obtained before and after the administration of contrast material revealed a large heterogeneous mass in the upper abdomen. The mass predominantly contained areas of fat that surrounded a central bony structure (Fig 1). The bony components of the mass resembled the remnants of a vertebral column.
|
Gross examination revealed the mass to be an anencephalic fetus in fetu that weighed approximately 2 kg and was 30 cm in length. Both extremities were well developed, and the entire skin was covered with hair. The gluteal cleft and genital tubercle were identified. No anal dimple was found. Chromosomal analysis was not performed.
Case 2
A 3-year-old girl presented with a slightly painful mass of 2 weeks duration in the left upper abdomen. At physical examination, a smooth, tender left flank mass was present. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.
A conventional radiograph of the abdomen revealed a mass that contained numerous calcifications that resembled bony structures. A CT scan showed a large heterogeneous mass in the retroperitoneum that displaced the left kidney posteriorly. The mass consisted predominantly of fat that contained multiple bony structures. The bony components resembled vertebral bodies and long bones (Fig 2).
|
|
Gross examination showed an anencephalic fetus in fetu that weighed approximately
kg and had skin that covered its entire body. The lower extremities were formed, with flipperlike feet. The trunk was formed incompletely, and an immature external genital ridge was present. No anal dimple, scrotal sac, or testicles were seen. No glial tissue or other evidence of organogenesis was seen. Chromosomal analysis was not performed.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is controversy as to whether fetus in fetu is a distinct entity or represents a highly organized teratoma. A teratoma is defined as a neoplasm with a slight potential for malignancy that is composed of multiple tissues foreign to the part in which they are located (7). It often is difficult to make a distinction between teratomas and vestigial remnants that result from abortive attempts at twinning. As a result, some authors think that fetus in fetu is within the spectrum of abnormalities that can result from the anomalous embryogenesis in a diamniotic monochorionic pregnancy. The spectrum includes conjoined symmetric twins; parasitic fetuses; embryonic vestigial fetal inclusions; and organized teratoma (7). Thus, some authors claim that fetus in fetu is only a well-differentiated highly organized teratoma (7).
However, many other investigators suggest that fetus in fetu is a pathologic entity that is distinct from teratoma for several reasons (8). Malignant degeneration associated with fetus in fetu is extremely rare, with only one reported case to our knowledge (8). Two-year follow-up has shown no evidence of recurrence in either of our two patients. Fetus in fetu occurs most commonly in the upper retroperitoneum, while teratoma usually occurs in the lower abdomen, ovaries, or sacrococcygeal region (9). Both of our patients' masses were located in the retroperitoneum.
A final important feature that has been used to distinguish between fetus in fetu and teratoma is the presence of a vertebral column. Willis (6) emphasized that the identification of a vertebral column secures the diagnosis of fetus in fetu and differentiates this entity from teratoma. Identification of the vertebral column indicates that fetal development of the included twin must have advanced at least to the primitive streak stage to develop a notochord, which is the precursor of the vertebral column (6). Occasional cases have been reported in which the spinal column could not be identified at imaging (10). These cases probably were due to an underdeveloped and markedly dysplastic spinal column that prevented the identification of vertebral bodies at imaging (11).
The fetus in fetu may increase in size and cause local mass effect and hemorrhage (12). Surgical excision is the recommended treatment. The intraabdominal fetus in fetu is usually contained in a complete sac, without any major vascular connections to the host. A few instances of definite vascular connections have been reported, but the predominant blood supply appears to be derived from the plexus where the fetus in fetu and the sac are attached to the abdominal wall (4). One of the masses was attached to the aorta by a vascular pedicle just below the superior mesenteric artery. This may explain the large size of the fetus in fetu and the delayed manifestation, as the fetus may have grown in the abdominal cavity.
Imaging played an important role in our ability to correctly diagnose both cases in a prospective fashion. The diagnosis of fetus in fetu can be made with abdominal conventional radiographs, by identifying a vertebral column and/or specific bony structures (10). Nocera et al (11) initially described the CT appearance of fetus in fetu. The CT findings were those of a mass that consisted of a round or tubular collection of fat that surrounded a central bony structure. The identification of vertebrae or long bones is essential for establishing this diagnosis prospectively. Our findings were similar to those reported and allowed us to correctly diagnose this rare lesion at the time of mass identification. CT also was helpful in determining the relationship of the mass to the other abdominal structures.
In summary, fetus in fetu is a pathologic condition that occurs from the abnormal embryogenesis in a diamniotic, monochorionic pregnancy. The issue is still debatable as to whether it represents a highly organized teratoma. However, its characteristic CT appearance allows correct prospective diagnosis of this very rare disease entity.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. E. Gerber, A. Kamaya, S. S. Miller, D. M. Cronin, B. Dwyer, J. Chueh, K. E. Conner, and R. A. Barth Fetus In Fetu: 11 Fetoid Forms in a Single Fetus: Review of the Literature and Imaging J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2008; 27(9): 1381 - 1387. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Borges, J. E. Lim-Dunham, and A. Vade Fetus In Fetu Appearing as a Prenatal Neck Mass J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2005; 24(9): 1313 - 1316. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Hong, H. W. Goo, M. R. Jung, H. J. Kim, E. A.-R. Kim, K. S. Kim, S. Y. Pi, S. C. Kim, J.-C. Hoeffel, and C. H. Yoon Fetus in Fetu: Three-Dimensional Imaging Using Multidetector CT Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1481 - 1483. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |