Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Blankenberg, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Blankenberg, F. G.
(Radiology. 2000;214:795-800.)
© RSNA, 2000


Experimental Studies

Radiolabeled Annexin V Imaging: Diagnosis of Allograft Rejection in an Experimental Rodent Model of Liver Transplantation1

Yasuhiro Ogura, MD, Sheri M. Krams, PhD, Olivia M. Martinez, PhD, Susan Kopiwoda, BS, John P. T. Higgins, MD, Carlos O. Esquivel, MD, PhD, H. William Strauss, MD, Johnathan F. Tait, MD, PhD and Francis G. Blankenberg, MD

1 From the Depts of Surgery (Y.O., S.M.K., O.M.M., C.O.E.), Radiology/Div of Nuclear Medicine (S.K., H.W.S., F.G.B.), and Pathology (J.P.T.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, 725 Welch Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304; and Dept of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (J.F.T.). Received Apr 14, 1999; revision requested May 10; final revision received Aug 6; accepted Aug 30. F.G.B. and H.W.S. supported in part by Children's Health Research Fund, Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital and by National Institutes of Health grant HL61717. J.F.T., O.M.M., and S.M.K. supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants HL-47151, DK47810, and AI35994, respectively. Y.O. supported in part by Stanford University School of Medicine Dean's Postdoctoral Fellowship. Address reprint requests to F.G.B. (e-mail: ma.frb@forsythe.standford.edu).


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To assess the value of imaging rejection-induced apoptosis with technetium 99m and annexin V, a human protein–based radiopharmaceutical used in the diagnosis of acute rejection of a liver transplant, in a well-characterized rodent model of orthotopic liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 99mTc-radiolabeled annexin V was intravenously administered to six allografted (immunologically mismatched) and five isografted (immunologically matched) recipient rats on days 2, 4, and 7 after orthotopic liver transplantation. Animals were imaged 1 hour after injection of 0.2–2.0 mCi (8.0–74.0 MBq) of radiolabeled annexin V by use of clinical nuclear scintigraphic equipment.

RESULTS: All animals in the allografted group demonstrated marked increases of 55% and 97% above the activity in the isografted group in hepatic uptake of annexin V on days 4 and 7, respectively. Severe acute rejection was histologically detected in all allografted livers on day 7. There was no histologic evidence of acute rejection in isografted animals. Dynamic hepatobiliary imaging with 99mTc and mebrofenin, an iminodiacetic acid derivative, demonstrated no correlation with the presence or absence of acute rejection or with annexin V uptake.

CONCLUSION: Noninvasive imaging with radiolabeled annexin V is more sensitive and specific than imaging with 99mTc-mebrofenin in the diagnosis of acute rejection of a liver transplant.

Index terms: Animals • Annexin V • Liver, radionuclide studies, 761.12172, 761.458 • Liver, transplantation, 761.12172, 761.458 • Mebrofenin • Radionuclide imaging, experimental studies, 761.12172, 761.458


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Advances in surgical techniques, organ preservation, and immunosuppression have markedly improved the survival of patients undergoing liver transplantation (14). However, the incidence of acute rejection remains high, occurring in about 50% of all liver transplant recipients; acute rejection may predispose patients to chronic rejection. Combined, acute and chronic rejection result in the loss of 15% of all hepatic allografts (5).

The diagnosis of rejection usually requires histologic evaluation of a hepatic sample obtained at biopsy (6,7). A variety of noninvasive modalities have been suggested for use in the assessment of hepatic allografts in the postoperative period. These modalities include gray-scale and Doppler ultrasonography (US) and hepatobiliary scintigraphy with use of the technetium 99m–iminodiacetic acid family of radiopharmaceuticals (815).

US is primarily useful in the detection of vascular complications. The most common of these is hepatic arterial thrombosis, which can be associated with hepatic graft failure, bile leakage, hemorrhage, or septicemia (1622). Unfortunately, US is not reliable in the diagnosis or exclusion of acute rejection.

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy has been shown to be useful in the prediction of graft survival. Uptake and rapid excretion of 99mTc–iminodiacetic acid compounds in a hepatic graft virtually excludes the presence of higher grades of acute rejection (815). Unfortunately, 99mTc–iminodiacetic acid scintigraphy is nonspecific. Depressed hepatic function manifested by delayed hepatic uptake and excretion is found in acute rejection, viral hepatitis, ascending cholangitis, cholestasis, and biliary stenosis and/or obstruction. Therefore, the cause of an abnormal 99mTc–iminodiacetic acid scintigram usually must be confirmed at biopsy (10). Even histologic analysis may give equivocal results because other hepatic diseases may mimic acute rejection (10).

The pathophysiologic development of rejection involves injury to the graft hepatocytes caused by host immune cells. One type of injury is the initiation of apoptosis in the graft hepatocytes. Recently, 99mTc-radiolabeled annexin V, a human protein–based radiopharmaceutical, has been shown to bind specifically to apoptotic cells in a rodent model of acute rejection of a heterotopic cardiac allograft transplant (2327). The uptake of annexin V observed in the analysis of region-of-interest images directly correlated with the severity of acute rejection, as seen at histologic evaluation (24). Annexin V imaging was also able to depict the response of allografted hearts to antirejection therapy.

In the present study, we used 99mTc–annexin V in the imaging of acute hepatic allograft rejection in a well-characterized rodent model of orthotopic liver transplantation (28). We compared the results of hepatobiliary scintigraphy with use of 99mTc and mebrofenin, an iminodiacetic acid derivative, with the results of scintigraphy with use of 99mTc–annexin V and with the results of histologic analysis of acute rejection of the liver transplant.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Animals
Inbred male Dark Agouti (RT1a) and Lewis rats (RT11) (Harlan; Indianapolis, Ind) weighing 220–239 g were housed in accordance with our institutional animal care guidelines. All animals had access to water and were fed standard laboratory chow ad libitum.

Lewis rats (n = 6) were grafted with livers from Dark Agouti rats to create an allogeneic combination (allografts, immunologically mismatched). Lewis rats (n = 5) were also grafted with livers from Lewis rats to make a syngeneic combination (isografts, immunologically matched). Additional groups of allografted (n = 3) and isografted animals (n = 2) developed postoperative complications of hepatic infarction (n = 2), portal venous thrombosis (n = 2), or biliary obstruction (n = 1) and were excluded from the imaging analysis of acute rejection. These animals, however, did undergo serial imaging prior to the diagnosis of these complications. They also underwent autopsy and histologic analysis in the same fashion as did the study group animals, as described later.

Transplantation Procedure
Liver transplantation was performed according to Kamada and Calne's technique (28), with the exception of the bile duct anastomosis. Donor and recipient surgery was performed aseptically; the animals were anesthetized with use of isoflurane. After laparotomy, a polyethylene tube was inserted into the common bile duct. Immediately before hepatectomy, the donor liver was perfused in situ via the portal vein with 10 mL of a lactated Ringer and heparin solution, which was cooled to 4°C. Then, plastic cuffs were attached to both the portal vein and the infrahepatic inferior vena cava. The liver was excised and stored at 4°C in a sterile container filled with normal saline solution until transplantation.

Orthotopic liver transplantation was performed in hepatectomized recipient rats, without reconstruction of the hepatic artery. The suprahepatic inferior vena cava of the graft was anastomosed to that of the recipient. The cuffed portal vein and infrahepatic inferior vena cava of the donor were inserted into those of the recipient. Finally, the tube that was already secured in the bile duct of the donor was inserted into the bile duct of the recipient. No immunosuppressive therapy was given to the recipient rats in this study.

Preparation of Radiopharmaceuticals
99mTc hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC)–annexin V was prepared as previously described (23,26). HYNIC, an analogue of nicotinic acid, is a bifunctional molecule that is capable of bonding to the lysine residues of proteins on one moiety and to the conjugates of 99mTc on the other (27). This agent forms stable complexes without affecting protein bioreactivity (function).

In brief, human annexin V produced by means of expression in Escherichia coli was derivatized with HYNIC. The conjugate of HYNIC and annexin V had an ability to bind phosphatidylserine that was equivalent to that of native annexin V. (Binding activity was determined with fluorescein-labeled annexin V by use of a modified competitive-inhibition fluorometric assay [23]. The 50%-inhibitory concentration of HYNIC–annexin V was 12.7 nmol/L; that of native annexin V was 8.3 nmol/L).

HYNIC-derivatized annexin V was produced by gently mixing annexin V with 6–HYNIC. To bind 99mTc to the HYNIC–annexin V conjugate, a reduced tin (stannous ion) and tricine solution was added to 99mTc pertechnetate with an aliquot of HYNIC–annexin V under anoxic conditions according to the methods described by Abrams et al (27). A 92%–97% radiopurity was routinely achieved, as confirmed at instant thin-layer chromatography with use of a 0.9% saline solution as a solvent. Specific activity was varied from 10 to 100 µCi per microgram of protein (0.4 to 3.7 MBq/µg) depending on the desired activity.

For hepatobiliary scintigraphy, 2 mCi (74 MBq) of 99mTc-mebrofenin (Choletec; Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ) was administrated per animal.

Radionuclide Imaging
A model 420 mobile camera (Technicare, Solon, Ohio) equipped with a low-energy high-resolution parallel-hole collimator was used to record the radionuclide distribution. Data were recorded by use of a 20% window centered on the photopeak of 99mTc onto a 256 x 256 matrix on a computer system that was dedicated for digital display and analysis (Icon; Siemens, Hoffman Estates, Ill).

Once the animals were placed under anesthesia by means of methoxyflurane inhalation, they were imaged in the prone-anterior projection in 10-minute static acquisitions. Imaging was performed 1 hour after the intravenous injection of 150–250 µCi (5.5–9.2 MBq, 5–20 µg of protein) of radiolabeled annexin V prior to hepatobiliary scintigraphy or after the injection of 1–2 mCi (37–74 MBq) of 99mTc-annexin V in animals not undergoing hepatobiliary scintigraphy. One milliliter of a 100-mL dilution of the injected 99mTc–annexin V activity (1% of the injected dose) was placed into a 3-mL plastic sample tube; the tube was placed at the right side of each animal during the acquisition of each image.

A subset of animals was arbitrarily selected to undergo hepatobiliary imaging immediately after annexin V imaging with an intravenous injection of 2 mCi (74 MBq) of 99mTc-mebrofenin. One-minute dynamic images (256 x 256 matrix, high sensitivity, high-resolution parallel-hole collimation) were initially obtained for 30 minutes immediately after the administration of a bolus injection of 99mTc-mebrofenin. A 30-minute–delayed static image was also obtained. One milliliter of a 100-mL dilution of the total dose of injected 99mTc-mebrofenin was also placed in a tube at the side of each of these animals during the acquisition of each hepatobiliary image. No corrections were made for 99mTc–annexin V hepatic background activity, as it was assumed that the 10:1 ratio of 99mTc-mebrofenin activity to 99mTc–annexin V activity made this correction unnecessary.

Image Analysis
Static annexin V images were analyzed for total graft activity (counts per minute). This was expressed as a percentage of the injected dose (counts per minute) as determined from the 1-mL aliquots of the injected dose that were placed at the right side of each animal at imaging. Values for each variable were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Time-decay curves were generated for graft activity from the dynamic 1-minute serial hepatobiliary images. The results of 99mTc-mebrofenin uptake measurements were expressed as the ratio of observed hepatic activity at 5 minutes to observed hepatic activity at 30 minutes.

Analysis of imaging data was performed by use of an Icon system (Siemens). Regions of interest were obtained by one of the authors (Y.O.), who took care to not include any renal uptake on the annexin V or hepatobiliary images. Regions of interest for hepatobiliary images were placed by another author (S.K.) at the center of the liver to avoid inclusion of any activity excreted into the bowel.

Histologic Analysis
The recipients rats were sacrificed on day 7 after transplantation. Samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin before processing. Tissue samples for histologic evaluation were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. All specimens were examined by a pathologist (J.P.T.H.) who was blinded to the imaging results for the presence and severity of acute rejection.

Statistical Analysis
Mean values and SEMs were calculated. Differences in mean values were determined by use of a two-tailed Student t test for the null hypothesis. P values less than .05 were considered to indicate significant differences.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
In Vivo Imaging of the Liver by Use of 99mTc HYNIC–Annexin V
Six allografted and five isografted rats underwent imaging with 99mTc HYNIC–annexin V on days 2, 4, and 7 after transplantation (Fig 1). Hepatic isografts demonstrated no marked increase in 99mTc HYNIC–annexin V uptake for the entire period of observation. Uptake values of the injected doses were as follows: day 2, 11.7% ± 0.98; day 4, 11.6% ± 1.49; and day 7, 14.8% ± 0.72.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Prone-anterior image (256 x 256 matrix, 10-minute acquisition, parallel-hole collimation) obtained 1 hour after the injection of 1-2 mCi (37-74 MBq) of radiolabeled annexin V on postoperative days 2, 4, and 7 in pairs of isografted (Syngeneic) and allografted (Allograft) animals depict the hepatic grafts (arrowheads), renal activity (solid arrows), and activity of the 1:100 dilutions of the injected activity (open arrows) that were placed into vials to the right of the animal. Note the progressive rise in hepatic uptake in the allografted animal on days 4 and 7 after surgery. Also note the baseline renal uptake in both animals.

 
Hepatic allografts showed uptake values of 99mTc HYNIC–annexin V on day 4 (21.8% ± 1.75) and day 7 (27.9% ± 1.01) after transplantation that were markedly higher than that seen on day 2 (10.0% ± 1.81). The uptake values observed in the allografted animals on days 4 and 7 after transplantation were also markedly higher than those of the corresponding isografted animals (Fig 2).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Graph depicts the region-of-interest analysis of the distribution of 99mTc HYNIC-annexin V in the liver after transplantation. Means and 95% confidence levels are shown for the syngeneic (isograft, n = 5) and allogeneic (allograft, n = 6) combinations. Uptake of radiolabeled annexin V progressively increased in the allografts compared with the isografts.

 
Approximately 40% of the injected dose of annexin V was taken up by the kidneys in both the isografted and allografted animals. There were no significant differences in renal uptake of annexin V between the groups at any time during the study (P > .05, data not shown).

Of the five animals that were excluded from the quantitative analysis (n = 11) because of postoperative complications, two (one isografted and one allografted) developed postoperative thrombosis of the portal vein. At the time of sacrifice, both animals demonstrated petechiae of the mesentery and venous congestion of the small and large bowels, which were also seen at histologic evaluation (Fig 3). These animals also had markedly increased annexin V uptake in the spleen and lung, with variable uptake in the liver.



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Prone-anterior image obtained 1 hour after the injection of 99mTc HYNIC-annexin V on postoperative days 4 and 7 in pairs of isografted (Syngeneic) and allografted (Allograft) animals without (left in each part) and with (right in each part) portal venous thrombosis (PVT) depict the hepatic grafts (arrows); pulmonary activity (p); and spleen (arrowhead), which is partially obscured by activity in the left kidney. Isografted and allografted animals without portal venous thrombosis demonstrated hepatic, pulmonary, and splenic activities of 12.9% and 30.3%, 1.8% and 3.0%, and 0.8% and 1.3% of the injected dose, respectively. Isografted and allografted animals with portal venous thrombosis demonstrated hepatic, pulmonary, and splenic uptakes of annexin V of 14.5% and 19.2%, 5.5% and 11.8%, and 16.1% and 22.7%, respectively.

 
Two other animals demonstrated photopenic lesions at both annexin V and mebrofenin imaging (Fig 4). These regions of photopenia directly corresponded to areas of postoperative hepatic infarction at histologic evaluation (data not shown). Another animal demonstrated a substantial accumulation of bile in the region of the porta hepatis due to postoperative biliary stricture with obstruction (Fig 5). Findings on the corresponding annexin V images were unremarkable.



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Prone-anterior static image (10-minute acquisitions, 256 x 256 matrix, parallel-hole collimation) obtained on postoperative day 7 in an allografted animal with 200 µCi (7.4 MBq) of annexin V (Annexin Allograft) followed by 2 mCi (74 MBq) of mebrofenin (HIDA [dimethyl iminodiacetic acid] Allograft) demonstrate the kidneys (K) and a focal photopenic defect (arrow) that corresponds to localized infarction of the medial segment of the left hepatic lobe, which was also observed at histologic analysis.

 


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. Prone-anterior static image (10-minute acquisitions, 256 x 256 matrix, parallel-hole collimation) obtained on postoperative day 7 after the injection of 200 µCi (7.4 MBq) of radiolabeled annexin V (Annexin) followed by the injection of 2 mCi (74 MBq) of mebrofenin (HIDA [dimethyl iminodiacetic acid]) depict the hepatic isograft (white arrow) and a biloma (black arrow). The annexin V image is unremarkable, with a hepatic uptake of 12.0% of the injected dose. The mebrofenin image, however, shows a collection of radiopharmaceutical that corresponds to an obstructed common bile duct due to an anastomotic stricture. Also note the lack of excretion of mebrofenin from the bowel on this 1-hour-delayed static image.

 
In Vivo Imaging of the Liver by Use of 99mTc-Mebrofenin
Isografted animals (n = 4) demonstrated mebrofenin uptake ratios of 1.75 ± 0.12, 1.53 ± 0.44, and 0.99 ± 0.21, and allograted animals (n = 4) demonstrated iminodiacetic acid uptake ratios of 1.41 ± 0.29, 0.97 ± 0.09, and 0.66 ± 0.11 on days 2, 4, and 7, respectively, after transplantation. Data from hepatobiliary imaging with use of 99mTc-mebrofenin demonstrated no consistent relationship with acute rejection (Table). Both allografted and isografted animals showed varied degrees of delayed uptake and excretion of mebrofenin, without marked differences between these two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
99mTc-Mebrofenin Uptake Ratios
 
Histologic Evaluation of the Hepatic Grafts
The hepatic graft sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Histologic evaluation of sections of isografts demonstrated preservation of hepatocytic architecture, with the presence of few scattered lymphocytes around the portal vein and bile ducts (Fig 6a). There was no sign of rejection in the isografted group. At the time of sacrifice, allografts showed marked periportal inflammatory infiltrates predominantly composed of lymphocytes, with a smaller number of eosinophils and plasma cells (Fig 6b). The lymphocytes infiltrated the epithelium of the bile duct and accumulated under the endothelium of the portal veins (endothelialitis). These changes were interpreted as being indicative of severe acute cellular rejection. Of note, there was no evidence of interstitial hemorrhage (peliosis hepatis).



View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6a. (a) Photomicrograph obtained in a 5-µm section of the isograft shows few lymphocytes (arrowhead) around the portal vein and bile duct; this is consistent with complete absence of acute rejection. Note the normal morphology of the hepatocytes (arrow) and the lack of portal triad abnormalities. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, x400.) (b) Photomicrograph shows numerous lymphocytes (arrowhead) infiltrating into and around the portal triad in the hepatic allograft; this is consistent with severe acute rejection. Note a complete lack of interstitial hemorrhage (peliosis hepatis) and a representative hepatocyte (arrow) that is being engulfed by lymphocytes. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, x400.)

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6b. (a) Photomicrograph obtained in a 5-µm section of the isograft shows few lymphocytes (arrowhead) around the portal vein and bile duct; this is consistent with complete absence of acute rejection. Note the normal morphology of the hepatocytes (arrow) and the lack of portal triad abnormalities. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, x400.) (b) Photomicrograph shows numerous lymphocytes (arrowhead) infiltrating into and around the portal triad in the hepatic allograft; this is consistent with severe acute rejection. Note a complete lack of interstitial hemorrhage (peliosis hepatis) and a representative hepatocyte (arrow) that is being engulfed by lymphocytes. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, x400.)

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Annexin V is a 36-kDa human protein that has an innate affinity for cells or platelet membranes with externalized phosphatidylserine (29,30). The physiologic role of annexin V has yet to be determined despite the fact that it is found in high concentrations in the cytoplasm of cells from a wide variety of cell lines, with virtually no detectable levels of annexin V in circulation. Curiously, circulating levels of annexin V rise acutely in a number of disorders, including myocardial infarction.

Most of the observed biologic activities of annexin V center on its ability to bind to phosphatidylserine on the surfaces of cells or platelets. Phosphatidylserine is a constituent, anionic, membrane-bound phospholipid that is restricted to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane by an adenosine triphosphate–dependent aminotransferase called translocase (31). However, cells (and platelets that are activated as part of the coagulation cascade) that undergo apoptosis rapidly redistribute phosphatidylserine from the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer to the outer leaflet by activating a normally quiescent enzyme called scramblase. The externalization of phosphatidylserine is a general feature of apoptosis and occurs before the morphologically observable events that are classically associated with apoptosis occur. Such events include cytoplasmic and nuclear condensation, membrane bleb formation, and DNA degradation (32).

Apoptosis plays an important role in the pathophysiologic development of acute rejection of transplants of the liver, heart, kidney, and small bowel (2,23,24,3337). Apoptotic nuclei have been identified in biopsy samples of acutely rejected transplants by use of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated deoxyuridine 5–triphosphate nick-end labeling, or TUNEL, staining.

Alternative noninvasive methods for the detection of acute rejection of a liver transplant have largely focused on the use of compounds related to 99mTc–iminodiacetic acid in the imaging of hepatocytic function (815). However, Gelfand et al (10), in their study of 30 children receiving liver transplants, were unable to derive useful criteria for the identification of acute rejection that is reversible with immunosuppressive therapy. In a porcine model, qualitative analysis of the half-life, the time for half of the activity to clear from the liver, increased with rejection (38).

Hawkins et al (9) observed in humans that 99mTc-disofenin uptake and excretion were prolonged in acute rejection of a liver transplant. In a study of 73 liver transplant recipients, Loken et al (8) found that liver uptake and excretion rates of hepatobiliary agents did not permit differentiation between the causes of depressed graft function; thus, biopsy was required to establish a specific diagnosis.

We were able to detect a marked increase in the uptake of 99mTc–annexin V in hepatic allografts, compared with that of the isografts, as early as 4 days after transplantation. Previous studies with this model showed clear histologic evidence of mononuclear infiltration that was associated with apoptotic hepatic nuclei in allografts; mononuclear infiltration occurred between 3 and 4 days after transplantation with a marked elevation in the level of serum glutathione S-transferase, compared with that of the isografts (2). Annexin V imaging qualitatively and quantitatively reflected this early stage of rejection in our animal model.

Annexin V imaging also demonstrated stereotypical patterns of regional uptake in the group of five animals that had postoperative complications. Lobar or segmental hepatic infarction manifested as photopenic regions at both 99mTc–annexin V and 99mTc-mebrofenin imaging presumably due to a lack of (or decrease in) delivery of the radiopharmaceutical to these regions by means of blood flow.

Portal venous thrombosis correlated with marked uptake values in the spleen and lung and with variable (increased or decreased) hepatic uptake. The reason for this pattern is unclear. Splenic uptake may be due to portal venous congestion, which allows for greater binding of annexin V over time, as compared with binding in the control animals. Pulmonary uptake was accompanied by segmental interstitial pneumonitis, as seen at histologic evaluation (data not shown).

In the setting of pulmonary infection, phosphatidylserine expression may be increased because of increased apoptotic cell death or local hypercoagulability. The variability of hepatic uptake with portal venous thrombosis may be due to a series of related factors, such as increased hepatic hypercoagulability or apoptosis. These can be associated with ischemia, which is balanced against decreased portal venous flow due to portal venous thrombosis and/or congestion. In the clinical setting, portal venous thrombosis can be readily diagnosed at US, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, possible confusion of portal venous thrombosis with acute rejection as a cause of abnormal increases in hepatic uptake of annexin V could be avoided.

Annexin V labeled with the N2S2 method has been used in previous studies to image pulmonary emboli and deep venous thrombosis in both animals (39) and humans (Tait JF, unpublished data, 1998). In the prior models of fulminant hepatitis used by Blankenberg et al (23,25), interstitial hemorrhage was a potential confounding variable in the analysis of the uptake of radiolabeled annexin V. Of note, we found no evidence of interstitial hemorrhage in the rejected allografts in our current study.

The application of radiolabeled annexin V in the clinical monitoring of liver transplant recipients would have several complementary advantages over the current scintigraphic and biopsy techniques. Annexin V imaging appears to be sensitive and specific for the screening of acute rejection, even in the early postoperative period. 99mTc also has a physical half-life of only 6 hours, and intravenously administered annexin V is extremely safe. (Annexin V has only a transient anticoagulant effect at doses of greater than 30 times the dose needed for imaging, that is, >=300 µg/kg [40].)

The serum clearance of annexin V is also rapid (3–7 minutes), permitting imaging 30 minutes after injection (38). Patients could be monitored with serial studies for the severity of acute rejection and for a response to therapy by use of standard clinical portable or fixed radionuclide imaging cameras, with acquisition times of 10 minutes or less.

One major difficulty in the use of radiolabeled annexin V is the relatively high nonspecific uptake in the renal cortex (25). As previously noted, this uptake is most likely due to nonspecific uptake of low-molecular-weight proteins by the proximal renal tubules. Fortunately, for clinical use, the N2S2 labeling method has less renal uptake (16.5% of injected dose) in pigs and in humans (39).

In conclusion, 99mTc–annexin V radionuclide imaging in an experimental rodent model of orthotopic liver transplantation appears to be sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute rejection. Further, studies in humans with use of the currently available annexin V preparations need to be undertaken to confirm these findings.Practical application: In the near future, it may be possible to use radiolabeled annexin V to routinely and noninvasively screen asymptomatic liver transplant recipients for acute (or low-grade) rejection. Once identified, these patients could be monitored with serial studies to assess the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviation: HYNIC = hydrazinonicotinamide

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, Y.O., S.M.K., F.G.B.; study concepts, Y.O., S.M.K., O.M.M., J.F.T., F.G.B.; study design and definition of intellectual content, Y.O., S.M.K., O.M.M., H.W.S., C.O.E., F.G.B.; literature research, Y.O., S.M.K., F.G.B.; experimental studies, Y.O., F.G.B.; data acquisition, Y.O., S.K., F.G.B.; data analysis, Y.O., S.K., J.P.T.H., F.G.B.; statistical analysis, Y.O., F.G.B.; manuscript preparation, Y.O., F.G.B.; manuscript editing, Y.O., S.M.K., O.M.M., J.P.T.H., H.W.S., F.G.B.; manuscript review, C.O.E.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Busuttil RW, Goldstein LI, Danovitch GM, Ament ME, Memsic LD. Liver transplantation today. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104:377-389.
  2. Krams SM, Martinez OM. Apoptosis as a mechanism of tissue injury in liver allograft rejection. Semin Liver Dis 1998; 18:153-167.[Medline]
  3. Wiesner RM. Advances in diagnosis, prevention and management of hepatic allograft rejection. Clin Chem 1994; 40:2174-2185.[Abstract]
  4. Adams DM, Neuberger JM. Patterns of graft rejection following liver transplantion. J Hepatol 1990; 10:113-119.[Medline]
  5. Vierling JM. Immunologic mechanisms of hepatic allograft rejection. Semin Liver Dis 1992; 12:16-27.[Medline]
  6. Banff schema for grading liver allograft rejection: an international consensus document. Hepatology 1997; 25:658-663.[Medline]
  7. Snover DC. Problems in the interpretation of liver biopsies after liver transplantation. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13(suppl 1):31-38.
  8. Loken MK, Ascher NL, Boudreau RJ, Najarian JS. Scintigraphic evaluation of liver transplant function. J Nucl Med 1986; 27:451-459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hawkins RA, Hall T, Gambhir SS, et al. Radionuclide evaluation of liver transplants. Semin Nucl Med 1986; 18:199-212.
  10. Gelfand MJ, Smith MS, Ryckman FC, et al. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Clin Nucl Med 1992; 17:542-549.[Medline]
  11. Shah AN, Dodson F, Fung J. Role of nuclear medicine in liver transplantation. Semin Nucl Med 1995; 25:36-48.[Medline]
  12. Molbert BL, Campbell WL, Skolnick ML. Evaluation of the transplanted liver and postoperative complications. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:521-540.[Medline]
  13. Petras S, Aurengo A, Le D, et al. Factor analysis in successive hepatobiliary imaging of native and transplant livers. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:847-851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Saini S. Imaging of the hepatobiliary tract. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1889-1894.[Free Full Text]
  15. Nghiem HV. Imaging of hepatic transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am 1998; 36:429-443.[Medline]
  16. Legman P, Costes V, Tudoret L, et al. Hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: diagnosis with spiral CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:97-101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Dravid VS, Shapiro MJ, Needleman L, et al. Arterial abnormalities following orthotopic liver transplantation: arteriographic findings and correlation with Doppler sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:585-589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kok T, Peeters PM, Hew JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound and angiography of the vasculature of the liver in children after orthotopic liver transplantation: a prospective study. Pediatr Radiol 1995; 25:517-524.[Medline]
  19. Orons PD, Sheng R, Zajko AB. Hepatic artery stenosis in liver transplantation recipients: prevalence and cholangiographic appearance of associated biliary complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:1145-1149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Nghiem HV, Tran K, Winter TC, et al. Imaging of complications in liver transplantation. RadioGraphics 1996; 16:825-840.[Abstract]
  21. Lee J, Ben-Ami T, Yousefzadeh D, et al. Extrahepatic portal vein stenosis in recipients of living-donor allografts: Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:85-90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Platt JF, Yutzy GG, Bude RO, et al. Use of Doppler sonography for revealing hepatic artery stenosis in liver transplant recipients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:473-476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Blankenberg FG, Katsikis PD, Tait JF, et al. In vivo detection and imaging of phosphatidylserine expression during programmed cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:6349-6354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Vriens PW, Blankenberg FG, Stoot JM, et al. The use of technetium Tc 99m annexin V for in vivo imaging of apoptosis during cardiac allograft rejection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116:844-853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Blankenberg FG, Katsikis PD, Tait JF, et al. Imaging of apoptosis (programmed cell death) with 99mTc annexin V. J Nucl Med 1999; 40:184-191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wood BL, Gibson DF, Tait JF. Increased erythrocyte phosphatidylserine exposure in sickle cell disease: flow cytometric measurement and clinical associations. Blood 1996; 88:1873-1880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Abrams MJ, Juweid M, ten Kate CI, et al. Technetium-99m–human polyclonal IgG radiolabeled via the hydrazino nicotinamide derivative for imaging focal sites of infection in rats. J Nucl Med 1990; 31:2022-2028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kamada N, Calne RY. Orthotopic liver transplantation in the rat: technique using cuff for portal vein anastomosis and biliary drainage. Transplantation 1979; 28:47-50.[Medline]
  29. Koopman G, Reutelingsperger CP, Kuijten GA, et al. Annexin V for flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on B cells undergoing apoptosis. Blood 1994; 84:1415-1420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Van Heerde WL, de Groot PG, Reutelingsperger CP. The complexity of the phospholipid binding protein annexin V. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73:172-179.[Medline]
  31. Zwaal RF, Schroit AJ. Pathophysiologic implications of membrane phospholipid asymmetry in blood cells. Blood 1997; 89:1121-1132.[Free Full Text]
  32. Allen RT, Hunter WJ, III, Agrawal DK. Morphological and biochemical characterization and analysis of apoptosis. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1997; 37:215-228.[Medline]
  33. Krams SM, Egawa H, Quinn MB, et al. Apoptosis as a mechanism of cell death in liver allograft rejection. Transplantation 1995; 59:621-625.[Medline]
  34. Ito H, Kasagi N, Shomori K, et al. Apoptosis in the human allografted kidney. Transplantation 1995; 60:794-798.[Medline]
  35. Fayyazi A, Schlemminger R, Gieseler R, et al. Apoptosis in the small intestinal allograft of the rat. Transplantation 1997; 63:947-951.[Medline]
  36. Krams SM, Hayashi M, Fox CK, et al. CD8+ cells are not necessary for allograft rejection nor the induction of apoptosis in an experimental model of small intestinal transplantation. J Immunol 1998; 160:3673-3680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Laguens RP, Meckert PM, Martino JS, et al. Identification of programmed cell death (apoptosis) in situ by means of specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragments in heart biopsy samples during acute rejection episodes. J Heart Lung Transplant 1996; 15:911-918.[Medline]
  38. De Jonge MWC, Pauwels EKJ, Hennis PJ, et al. Cholescintigraphy and Tc-99m-IDA for detection of rejection in auxiliary liver transplants in pigs. Eur J Nucl Med 1983; 8:485-488.[Medline]
  39. Stratton JR, Dewhurst TA, Kasina S, et al. Selective uptake of radiolabeled annexin V on acute porcine left atrial thrombi. Circulation 1995; 92:3113-3121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Tait JF. Clinical applications of annexins. In: Seton BA, eds. Annexins: molecular structure to cellular function. Austin, Tex: R.G. Landes, 1996; 213-220.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
J. M H Van den Brande, T. C Koehler, Z. Zelinkova, R. J Bennink, A. A te Velde, F. J W ten Cate, S. J H van Deventer, M. P Peppelenbosch, and D. W Hommes
Prediction of antitumour necrosis factor clinical efficacy by real-time visualisation of apoptosis in patients with Crohn's disease
Gut, April 1, 2007; 56(4): 509 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. H. Boersma, B. L.J.H. Kietselaer, L. M.L. Stolk, A. Bennaghmouch, L. Hofstra, J. Narula, G. A.K. Heidendal, and C. P.M. Reutelingsperger
Past, Present, and Future of Annexin A5: From Protein Discovery to Clinical Applications
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2035 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Takei, Y. Kuge, S. Zhao, M. Sato, H. W. Strauss, F. G. Blankenberg, J. F. Tait, and N. Tamaki
Time Course of Apoptotic Tumor Response After a Single Dose of Chemotherapy: Comparison with 99mTc-Annexin V Uptake and Histologic Findings in an Experimental Model
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2083 - 2087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Taki, T. Higuchi, A. Kawashima, J. F. Tait, S. Kinuya, A. Muramori, I. Matsunari, K. Nakajima, N. Tonami, and H. W. Strauss
Detection of Cardiomyocyte Death in a Rat Model of Ischemia and Reperfusion Using 99mTc-Labeled Annexin V
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1536 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Peker, L. Sarda-Mantel, P. Loiseau, F. Rouzet, L. Nazneen, G. Martet, J.-M. Vrigneaud, A. Meulemans, G. Saumon, J.-B. Michel, et al.
Imaging Apoptosis with 99mTc-Annexin-V in Experimental Subacute Myocarditis
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1081 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. H. Britz-Cunningham and S. J. Adelstein
Molecular Targeting with Radionuclides: State of the Science
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 1945 - 1961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Sarwal, M.-S. Chua, N. Kambham, S.-C. Hsieh, T. Satterwhite, M. Masek, and O. Salvatierra Jr.
Molecular Heterogeneity in Acute Renal Allograft Rejection Identified by DNA Microarray Profiling
N. Engl. J. Med., July 10, 2003; 349(2): 125 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Petrovsky, E. Schellenberger, L. Josephson, R. Weissleder, and A. Bogdanov Jr.
Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging of Tumor Apoptosis
Cancer Res., April 15, 2003; 63(8): 1936 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Mochizuki, Y. Kuge, S. Zhao, E. Tsukamoto, M. Hosokawa, H. W. Strauss, F. G. Blankenberg, J. F. Tait, and N. Tamaki
Detection of Apoptotic Tumor Response In Vivo After a Single Dose of Chemotherapy with 99mTc-Annexin V
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2003; 44(1): 92 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. M. Post, P. D. Katsikis, J. F. Tait, S. M. Geaghan, H. W. Strauss, and F. G. Blankenberg
Imaging Cell Death with Radiolabeled Annexin V in an Experimental Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2002; 43(10): 1359 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Belhocine, N. Steinmetz, R. Hustinx, P. Bartsch, G. Jerusalem, L. Seidel, P. Rigo, and A. Green
Increased Uptake of the Apoptosis-imaging Agent 99mTc Recombinant Human Annexin V in Human Tumors after One Course of Chemotherapy as a Predictor of Tumor Response and Patient Prognosis
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2002; 8(9): 2766 - 2774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Weissleder and U. Mahmood
Molecular Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 316 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNMHome page
F. G. Blankenberg, L. Naumovski, J. F. Tait, A. M. Post, and H. W. Strauss
Imaging Cyclophosphamide-Induced Intramedullary Apoptosis in Rats Using 99mTc-Radiolabeled Annexin V
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
C. H. Contag, S. Fraser, and R. Weissleder
Strategies in In Vivo Molecular Imaging
NeoReviews, December 1, 2000; 1(12): e225 - 232.
[Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. D'Arceuil, W. Rhine, A. de Crespigny, M. Yenari, J. F. Tait, W. H. Strauss, T. Engelhorn, A. Kastrup, M. Moseley, F. G. Blankenberg, et al.
99mTc Annexin V Imaging of Neonatal Hypoxic Brain Injury Editorial Comment
Stroke, November 1, 2000; 31(11): 2692 - 2700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Blankenberg, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Blankenberg, F. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS