Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nino-Murcia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nino-Murcia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, K. A.
(Radiology. 2000;215:746-751.)
© RSNA, 2000


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Focal Liver Lesions: Pattern-based Classification Scheme for Enhancement at Arterial Phase CT1

Matilde Nino-Murcia, MD, Eric W. Olcott, MD, R. Brooke Jeffrey, Jr, MD, Robert L. Lamm, MD 2, Christopher F. Beaulieu, MD, PhD and Kiran A. Jain, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (M.N.M., E.W.O., R.B.J., R.L.L., C.F.B.); the Radiology Service (114), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (M.N.M., E.W.O.); and the Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento (K.A.J.). Received November 9, 1998; revision requested January 5, 1999; final revision received August 31; accepted September 15. Address correspondence to M.N.M. (e-mail: ninomurcia@forsythe.stanford.edu).


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To present our early experience with a classification scheme for categorizing focal liver lesions on the basis of the enhancement patterns that they exhibit in the arterial phase of computed tomography (CT) and to determine whether particular enhancement patterns suggest particular diagnoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed arterial phase CT images in 100 consecutive patients with focal liver lesions, excluding simple cysts. The enhancement pattern of the dominant or representative lesion in each patient was classified into one of five categories—homogeneous, abnormal internal vessels or variegated, peripheral puddles, complete ring, or incomplete ring—by three radiologists blinded to the proved diagnosis. Lesions without enhancement were recorded separately. Agreement was reached by consensus in all cases. Standards of reference included findings at histologic examination, correlative imaging, or clinical and imaging follow-up.

RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of the 100 lesions demonstrated arterial phase enhancement. Patterns associated with positive predictive values of 82% or greater and specificity of 80% or greater included abnormal internal vessels or variegated (hepatocellular carcinoma), peripheral puddles (hemangioma), and complete ring (metastasis).

CONCLUSION: The appearance of hepatic lesions in the arterial phase of enhancement has potential use in the determination of specific diagnoses. The classification scheme used in this study may be a useful tool for the interpretation of arterial phase CT studies.

Index terms: Angioma, 761.3194 • Liver, focal nodular hyperplasia, 761.3198 • Liver neoplasms, CT, 761.12112, 761.12114, 761.12115 • Liver neoplasms, diagnosis, 761.32, 761.33 • Liver neoplasms, secondary, 761.33


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
With helical computed tomographic (CT) technology, images can be obtained rapidly during the different phases of hepatic parenchymal enhancement. Previous studies have demonstrated improved detection of focal hypervascular liver lesions with this dual-phase technique in comparison with conventional imaging during the portal venous phase alone (15). Additionally, recent studies have reported the value of this technique in establishing the diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions on the basis of their appearances during the different phases of enhancement (6,7). The purpose of this study was to present our early experience with a classification scheme for categorizing focal liver lesions on the basis of the enhancement patterns that they exhibit in the arterial phase of CT and to determine whether particular enhancement patterns suggest particular diagnoses.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Patients
Arterial phase CT images were analyzed retrospectively in 100 consecutive patients (42 women and 58 men; age range, 25–84 years; mean age, 57 years) with focal hepatic lesions, excluding simple cysts; adequately enhanced arterial phase images; and an established diagnosis. Adequately enhanced arterial phase images were defined as those exhibiting heterogeneous (moiré) enhancement of the spleen. Scans without adequate enhancement, as determined by consensus, were excluded. Patients were referred for CT evaluation of clinically suspected primary or secondary hepatic neoplasms, further evaluation of abnormalities found on ultrasonographic (US) studies obtained for a variety of indications, or further evaluation of hepatic abnormalities found on imaging studies obtained at other institutions.

Lesions
Only one lesion per patient was analyzed. In patients with multiple lesions, the dominant lesion (on the basis of size) or a representative lesion (when no dominant lesion was apparent) was analyzed. Forty patients had a single lesion: 23 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), seven metastases, five focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs), five hemangiomas. Sixty patients had multiple lesions: 46 metastases, eight HCCs, four hemangiomas, one cholangiocarcinoma, one abscess. The maximal dimension of the lesions ranged from 1.0 to 16.5 cm (mean, 4.9 cm) for metastases, 1.0–14.3 cm (mean, 5.2 cm) for HCC, 2–10 cm (mean, 4.6 cm) for hemangiomas, and 2.2–7.7 cm (mean, 4.9 cm) for FNH.

The final diagnoses were established at histopathologic examination of surgical or percutaneous biopsy specimens or on the basis of the clinical course and results from follow-up imaging studies (Table 1). Hepatocellular carcinomas were diagnosed in 31 (31%) patients: in 30 at histopathologic examination and in one on the basis of clinical history, elevated {alpha}-fetoprotein level, and progression of disease depicted on follow-up CT studies obtained during 10 months. Cholangiocarcinoma was diagnosed in one patient at histopathologic examination. Hemangioma was diagnosed in nine (9%) patients: at histopathologic examination in two and on the basis of the characteristic appearance of these lesions on follow-up studies in five (magnetic resonance [MR] imaging in two, US in three, and CT in one). FNH was diagnosed in five (5%) patients: on the basis of technetium 99m sulfur colloid scanning in four and 10-month follow-up MR study in one. Abscess in one patient was confirmed on the basis of positive blood cultures and the response to treatment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Standards of Reference for 100 Focal Liver Lesions
 
Metastases were diagnosed in 53 (53%) patients: in 22 at histopathologic examination and in 31 on the basis of increasing lesion size or number over time (3–24 months) as demonstrated at CT in 30 patients or US in one. The metastases originated from the following primary tumors: colon carcinoma (n = 17), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 11), carcinoid (n = 5), breast carcinoma (n = 5), lung carcinoma (n = 2), lymphoma (n = 2), germ cell tumor (n = 1), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (n = 1), small-bowel stromal tumor (n = 1), retroperitoneal liposarcoma (n = 1), melanoma (n = 1), ovarian carcinoma (n = 1), retroperitoneal paraganglioma (n = 1), plasmacytoma (n = 1), prostate adenocarcinoma (n = 1), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), and squamous cell carcinoma of the neck (n = 1).

CT Technique
All scans were obtained with a helical CT scanner (HiSpeed Advantage; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). An initial nonenhanced scan was acquired with 10-mm section thickness at 20-mm intervals through the liver. After a 20-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted, a total of 150 mL of nonionic contrast medium with 300 mg of iodine per milliliter (Omnipaque; Nycomed, Princeton, NJ) was administered at 4–5 mL/sec. Beginning 25 seconds after initiation of the contrast material injection, a 30-second breath-hold arterial phase helical CT scan was acquired with section thickness of 7 mm and pitch (usually 1.0–1.6) sufficient to cover the entire liver within the breath-hold period. A breath-hold portal venous phase scan was obtained 60–70 seconds after initiation of the injection. Images were reconstructed at 7-mm intervals with use of standard soft-tissue (window width, 400 HU; level, 40 HU) and liver (window width, 150 HU; level, 50–80 HU) display settings.

Image Analysis
The liver and soft-tissue images for each patient were reviewed by three radiologists (R.B.J., E.W.O., M.N.M.) blinded to the final diagnosis. For each patient, the arterial phase enhancement pattern of the dominant or representative lesion was determined relative to the surrounding liver parenchyma and classified into one of five patterns. The "homogeneous" pattern was defined as diffuse uniform enhancement with no more than 10% central low attenuation with any evident vessels having normal contour and branching (Fig 1). The "abnormal internal vessels or variegated" pattern was defined as either visible internal vessels that were irregular in contour and branched in a distorted fashion unlike normal progressive anatomic arborization or randomly distributed hyperattenuating and hypoattenuating regions (Fig 2). The "peripheral puddles" pattern was defined as discrete well-defined peripheral enhancing globules with attenuation equal to that of enhancing arterial structures (Fig 3). The "complete ring" pattern was defined as circumferential ring enhancement surrounding a predominant central region with low attenuation (Fig 4). The "incomplete ring" pattern was defined as noncircumferential ring enhancement (Fig 5). Lesions with no appreciable enhancement on the arterial phase images were recorded separately. Agreement regarding the classification of all lesions was reached by consensus. Disagreements were resolved by majority opinion. The enhancement patterns included in the classification scheme were defined a priori and were based on the authors' previous experience in reviewing abdominal CT scans and enhancement patterns described in the literature (3,6,7).



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Homogeneous pattern. Transverse arterial phase CT scan of FNH (arrows) with diffuse uniform enhancement.

 


View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Abnormal internal vessels or variegated pattern depicted on transverse arterial phase CT scans. (a) HCC with visible internal vessels (arrow) that are irregular in contour. (b) HCC (arrows) with randomly distributed hyper- and hypoattenuating regions.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Abnormal internal vessels or variegated pattern depicted on transverse arterial phase CT scans. (a) HCC with visible internal vessels (arrow) that are irregular in contour. (b) HCC (arrows) with randomly distributed hyper- and hypoattenuating regions.

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Peripheral puddles pattern. Transverse arterial phase CT scan of a hemangioma with peripheral enhancing globules (arrows) with attenuation similar to that of the aorta.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Complete ring pattern. Transverse arterial phase CT scan of metastases from a small-bowel carcinoid depicts ring enhancement (arrows) with well-defined smooth inner margins surrounding central regions of low attenuation.

 


View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. Incomplete ring pattern. Transverse arterial phase CT scan of a metastasis from an adenocarcinoma of the breast depicts partial ring enhancement (arrow).

 
The positive predictive value (PPV) for the different enhancement patterns and the sensitivity and specificity for the different histologic diagnoses were determined. PPV indicates the probability that a particular disease is present when a particular enhancement pattern is observed. In contrast, sensitivity indicates the probability that a particular enhancement pattern will be observed when a particular disease is present. Specificity indicates the probability that a particular enhancement pattern will be present only when a particular disease is present.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Enhancement Patterns and Corresponding Diagnoses
The arterial phase enhancement features and final diagnoses of the 100 focal hepatic lesions are summarized in Table 2. Twenty-three lesions demonstrated the homogeneous pattern of enhancement: 13 (57%) HCC, five (22%) FNH, four (17%) metastasis, and one (4%) hemangioma. Ten lesions demonstrated the abnormal internal vessels or variegated pattern of enhancement: nine (90%) HCCs and one (10%) metastasis. Seven lesions demonstrated the pattern of peripheral puddles: six (86%) hemangiomas and one melanoma metastasis (Fig 6). Forty-nine lesions exhibited the complete ring pattern: 40 (82%) metastasis, seven (14%) HCC, one (2%) cholangiocarcinoma, and one (2%) abscess. Three lesions exhibited the incomplete ring pattern: two (67%) hemangiomas and one (33%) metastasis. Eight lesions demonstrated no enhancement: six (75%) metastasis and two (25%) HCC.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Arterial Phase Enhancement Patterns of 100 Focal Liver Lesions
 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Melanoma metastasis (arrows) exhibits the peripheral puddles pattern. Transverse arterial phase CT scan demonstrates peripheral enhancing globules with attenuation similar to that of the aorta. This appearance is similar to that of the hemangioma in Figure 3.

 
The PPVs of each pattern for individual final diagnoses are given in Table 3. Three patterns of enhancement were associated with PPVs of 82% or greater: the abnormal internal vessels or variegated pattern for HCC, the peripheral puddles pattern for hemangioma, and the complete ring pattern for metastasis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Arterial Phase Enhancement Patterns of HCC, Hemangioma, FNH, and Metastasis of 100 Focal Liver Lesions
 
Diagnoses and Corresponding Enhancement Patterns
The enhancement patterns associated with each diagnosis are summarized in Table 3 as are their corresponding sensitivity and specificity values. For HCC, two arterial enhancement patterns were observed: homogeneous and abnormal internal vessels or variegated, with the homogeneous pattern being the most sensitive. For hemangioma, the pattern of peripheral puddles was only mildly sensitive though highly specific. The homogeneous pattern was observed in one 2.3-cm hemangioma. All the FNH lesions exhibited the homogeneous enhancement pattern, making this pattern highly sensitive although not highly specific. No FNH exhibited visible vessels.

Table 4 summarizes the arterial enhancement patterns exhibited by metastases. The primary lesions for 13 of the 53 metastases are commonly considered hypervascular, including carcinoid, breast carcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma. The most frequently observed enhancement patterns in these lesions were complete ring in six and homogeneous in three. Enhancement patterns among the remaining four lesions were abnormal internal vessels or variegated in one carcinoid, peripheral puddles in one melanoma, incomplete ring in one breast carcinoma, and no enhancement in one breast carcinoma. The primary lesions for the remaining 40 metastases are commonly considered hypovascular. The most frequently observed enhancement pattern in this group was the complete ring in 34.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Arterial Phase Enhancement Patterns Exhibited by Metastases
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Prior to the introduction of helical CT, characterization of focal liver lesions at CT was based mainly on their appearance during the portal venous phase of enhancement (810). Unfortunately however, except for hemangiomas, relatively few lesions exhibit a highly specific appearance during the portal venous phase. With helical CT, imaging during the arterial phase became possible. Early experience suggests that the arterial phase appearance of hepatic lesions may be diagnostically useful (6,7). The purpose of this study was to apply a classification scheme to the appearance of lesions in the arterial phase and to determine whether a certain appearance suggests a particular diagnosis.

Ninety-two of the 100 lesions included in this study exhibited appearances that met criteria for classification into one of the five enhancement categories; the remaining eight (8%) lesions exhibited no enhancement in the arterial phase. Three arterial phase enhancement patterns were associated with PPVs that exceeded 82% for particular diagnoses, including the abnormal internal vessels or variegated pattern as suggestive of HCC, the peripheral puddles pattern as suggestive of hemangioma, and the complete ring pattern as suggestive of metastases. Accordingly, in our early experience, these arterial phase enhancement patterns can be considered suggestive of these diagnoses.

An ideal imaging sign for the purpose of differentiating one diagnosis from another is one that exhibits both high PPV, meaning that the likelihood of a particular diagnosis is great when the sign is present, and high specificity, meaning that the likelihood of the sign being present in the absence of the particular diagnosis is small. All three arterial phase enhancement patterns associated with PPVs of 82% or greater also were associated with a specificity of 80% or greater: the abnormal internal vessels or variegated pattern for the diagnosis of HCC, the peripheral puddles pattern for the diagnosis of hemangioma, and the complete ring pattern for the diagnosis of metastasis. These three arterial phase enhancement patterns, with both high PPV and high specificity, are likely to be the most clinically useful.

The abnormal internal vessels or variegated pattern indicated HCC with a PPV of 90% and a specificity of 98%. We required lesions in this category to have either abnormal internal vessels or randomly distributed components of both hyperattenuation and hypoattenuation. Our definition for abnormal internal vessels required vessels to be irregular in contour or to branch erratically, findings that reflected neovascularity associated with malignancy in angiographic studies (11). This definition would not include the central feeding vessels described by Van Hoe and colleagues (6) within a small proportion of FNHs, because the arterial supply to such lesions does not exhibit abnormal contours or abnormal arborization (11). Concerning variegated enhancement, hyperattenuation was required specifically in our series, rather than just heterogeneity as described in the mosaic pattern in portal venous phase imaging (1214), to confer specificity for HCC, which often is hyperattenuating in the arterial phase (1,3,4). This enhancement feature may reflect the presence of viable tumor interspersed with necrosis, as suggested by previous authors (12,15).

The peripheral puddles pattern was associated with hemangiomas in all but one case. Thus, the PPV and specificity of this pattern for hemangioma were 86% and 99%, respectively. The appearance of discrete well-defined peripheral globules isoattenuating with vascular structures has been well established as characteristic of hemangiomas (9,16,17). The only other lesion in our series that exhibited this pattern was a melanoma metastasis; we regard this as atypical, and it may be prudent to consider lesions with this appearance as indeterminate in patients with known melanoma and consider further work-up with MR imaging in such cases.

Lesions with circumferential ring enhancement usually were malignant. When all lesions exhibiting this enhancement pattern were considered, malignancy was predicted with a PPV of 98% (48 of 49) and specificity of 93% (14 of 15). These findings are similar to those in the series of Van Leeuwen and colleagues (7), who found that a hyperattenuating ring in the arterial phase was associated with malignancy in all cases. It is important to bear in mind, however, that not all ring-enhancing lesions are malignant; for example, as noted in one patient in our series, this feature may also be noted with abscesses (18). Lesions with circumferential ring enhancement in our classification scheme were most frequently encountered in metastatic disease. Peripheral enhancement seen in metastases may reflect perfused, viable tumor tissue in the periphery of the lesion and fibrosis or necrosis in the center (7,10,19).

The remaining two enhancement patterns in our categorization scheme, the homogeneous pattern and the incomplete ring pattern, were associated with PPVs too low to be considered clinically useful for the purpose of distinguishing lesions of different histologic origins.

Eight (8%) of the 100 lesions did not exhibit any arterial phase enhancement, including six metastases and two HCCs. This percentage is smaller than that reported in other studies of focal hepatic lesions in general (6,7) and hepatic metastases in particular (5,20,21). Among our metastases, 92% (12 of 13) and 88% (35 of 40) of hypervascular and hypovascular lesions, respectively, exhibited enhancement. We speculate that the higher frequency of enhancement observed in our study may reflect differences in the severity of disease in patients enrolled at different institutions.

An important observation is that overlap can occur between the appearances of benign and malignant lesions. For example, as found in this study and others, the homogeneous pattern can be exhibited by lesions such as HCC, hemangiomas, and FNH (6,7,22,23). Additionally, we found overlap between the peripheral puddles pattern typical of hemangiomas and the enhancement exhibited by one melanoma metastasis. Correlation with portal venous phase images, not the object of this study, may help differentiate lesions that exhibit similar arterial phase enhancement patterns. Likewise, correlation with MR imaging, scintigraphic studies, or biopsy may be required to achieve a definitive diagnosis.

A number of limitations should be considered with this study. First, we focused on visible features exhibited by lesions in the arterial phase, not their detectability or conspicuity. Second, the study was retrospective and limited to patients who underwent dual-phase scanning. Third, it is possible that the results would differ with a larger series. For example, relatively few hemangiomas and hypervascular metastases were included in our study, and further work will be necessary to more fully examine their enhancement patterns. Fourth, we did not examine lesions in the portal venous phase because this was not the focus of the study. In practice, portal venous phase imaging may also contribute useful information. Finally, our thresholds for considering PPVs and specificity to be clinically useful are subjective and based on our own clinical experience.

Our early experience suggests that the peripheral puddles, complete ring, and abnormal internal vessels or variegated enhancement patterns in the arterial phase are associated with the diagnoses of hemangioma, metastasis, and HCC, respectively, with PPV of 82%–90% and specificity of 80%–99%. Thus, the appearance of hepatic lesions in the arterial phase of enhancement has potential use in the determination of specific diagnoses, and the classification scheme presented herein may be a useful tool for the interpretation of arterial phase CT studies.


    Footnotes
 
2 Current address: Department of Radiology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Calif. Back

Abbreviations: HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma, FNH = focal nodular hyperplasia, PPV = positive predictive value

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, M.N.M.; study concepts and design, R.B.J., E.W.O., M.N.M., R.L.L.; definition of intellectual content, R.B.J., M.N.M., E.W.O.; literature research, M.N.M., E.W.O.; clinical studies, all authors; data acquisition, R.B.J., M.N.M., E.W.O., R.L.L.; data analysis, E.W.O., M.N.M., R.B.J.; manuscript preparation and editing, M.N.M., E.W.O., R.B.J.; manuscript review, all authors.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB, Jr, Nino-Murcia M, Jorgensen MJ, Harris DP. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (<1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:879-884.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M. Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase. Radiology 1995; 197:357-363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cho JS, Kwag JG, Oh YR, Song CJ. Detection and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of dynamic CT during the arterial dominant phase with uniphasic contrast medium injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:128-134.[Medline]
  4. Hwang GJ, Kim MJ, Yoo HS, Lee JT. Nodular hepatocellular carcinomas: detection with arterial, portal, and delayed phase images at spiral CT. Radiology 1997; 202:383-388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Paulson EK, McDermott VG, Keogan MT, DeLong DM, Frederick MG, Nelson RC. Carcinoid metastases to the liver: role of triple-phase helical CT. Radiology 1998; 206:143-150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Van Hoe L, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, et al. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of an early-phase acquisition in the differential diagnosis of non-cystic focal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1185-1192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Van Leeuwen MS, Noordzij J, Feldberg MAM, Hennipman AH, Doornewaard H. Focal liver lesions: characterization with triphasic spiral CT. Radiology 1996; 201:327-336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Freeny PC, Marks WM. Patterns of contrast enhancement of benign and malignant hepatic neoplsms during bolus dynamic and delayed CT. Radiology 1986; 160:613-618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Leslie DF, Johnson CD, Johnson CM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Distinction between cavernous hemangiomas of the liver and hepatic metastases on CT: value of contrast enhancement patterns. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:625-629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Honda H, Matsuura Y, Onitsuka H, et al. Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors (hepatoma, hemangioma, and metastasis) with CT: value of two-phase incremental imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159:735-740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Reuter SR, Redman HC, Cho KJ. Tumors. In: Manke D, eds. Gastrointestinal angiography. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1986; 162-171.
  12. Lalonde L, Van Beers B, Jamart J, Pringot J. Capsule and mosaic pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between CT and MR imaging. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; 17:241-244.[Medline]
  13. Honda H, Onitsuka H, Murakami J, et al. Characteristic findings of hepatocellular carcinoma: an evaluation with comparative study of US, CT, and MRI. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; 17:245-249.[Medline]
  14. Stevens WR, Gulino SP, Batts KP, Stephens DH, Johnson CD. Mosaic pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma: histologic basis for a characteristic CT appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:337-342.[Medline]
  15. Choi BI, Lee GK, Kim ST, Man CH. Mosaic pattern of encapsulated hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and pathology. Gastrointest Radiol 1990; 15:238-240.[Medline]
  16. Quinn SF, Benjamin GG. Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: simple diagnostic sign with dynamic bolus CT. Radiology 1992; 182:545-548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL. Diagnostic approach to hepatic hemangiomas. Radiology 1990; 176:11-13.[Free Full Text]
  18. Berland L, Lee JKT, Stanley RJ. Liver and biliary tract. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, eds. Computed body tomography with MRI correlation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven, 1989; 593-659.
  19. Lin G, Lunderquist A, Hagerstrand I, Boijsen E. Postmortem examination of the blood supply and vascular pattern of small liver metastases in man. Surgery 1984; 96:517-526.[Medline]
  20. Oliver JH, Baron RL, Federle MP. Jones BC, Sheng R. Hypervascular liver metastases: do unhenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection? Radiology 1997; 205:709-715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Frederick MG, Paulson EK, Nelson RC. Helical CT for detecting focal liver lesions in patients with breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast phase, hepatic arterial phase, and portal venous phase. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:229-235.[Medline]
  22. Yamashita Y, Ogata I, Urata J, Takahashi M. Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: pathologic correlation with dynamic CT findings. Radiology 1997; 203:121-125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hanafusa K, Ohashi I, Gomi N, Himeno Y, Wakita T, Shibuya H. Differential diagnosis of early homogeneously enhancing hepatocellular carcinoma and hemangioma by two-phase CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:361-368.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Marin, R. C. Nelson, E. Samei, E. K. Paulson, L. M. Ho, D. T. Boll, D. M. DeLong, T. T. Yoshizumi, and S. T. Schindera
Hypervascular Liver Tumors: Low Tube Voltage, High Tube Current Multidetector CT during Late Hepatic Arterial Phase for Detection--Initial Clinical Experience
Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 771 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Luo, K. Numata, M. Morimoto, M. Kondo, S. Takebayashi, M. Okada, S. Morita, and K. Tanaka
Focal Liver Tumors: Characterization with 3D Perflubutane Microbubble Contrast Agent-enhanced US versus 3D Contrast-enhanced Multidetector CT
Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 287 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Hughes-Cassidy, J. Wong, D. Aguirre, A. D. Chavez, T. Wolfson, A. Gamst, and C. Sirlin
Transient Homogeneously Enhancing Hepatic Masses: Can Size Predict Benignity?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 300 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Vasanawala and T. Desser
Value of delayed imaging in MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 154 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-S. Yu and N. M. Rofsky
Hepatic metastases: perilesional enhancement on dynamic MRI.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H.-X. Xu, G.-J. Liu, M.-D. Lu, X.-Y. Xie, Z.-F. Xu, Y.-L. Zheng, and J.-Y. Liang
Characterization of Small Focal Liver Lesions Using Real-time Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: Diagnostic Performance Analysis in 200 Patients.
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2006; 25(3): 349 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. M. Elsayes, V. R. Narra, Y. Yin, G. Mukundan, M. Lammle, and J. J. Brown
Focal Hepatic Lesions: Diagnostic Value of Enhancement Pattern Approach with Contrast-enhanced 3D Gradient-Echo MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1299 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Giorgio, G. Ferraioli, L. Tarantino, G. de Stefano, V. Scala, F. Scarano, C. Coppola, and L. Del Viscovo
Contrast-Enhanced Sonographic Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Helical CT Appearance
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1319 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Quaia, F. Calliada, M. Bertolotto, S. Rossi, L. Garioni, L. Rosa, and R. Pozzi-Mucelli
Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions with Contrast-specific US Modes and a Sulfur Hexafluoride-filled Microbubble Contrast Agent: Diagnostic Performance and Confidence
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 420 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. H. Y. Lee, M. E. O'Malley, M. A. Haider, and A. Hanbidge
Triple-Phase MDCT of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 643 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Isozaki, K. Numata, T. Kiba, K. Hara, M. Morimoto, T. Sakaguchi, H. Sekihara, T. Kubota, H. Shimada, T. Morizane, et al.
Differential Diagnosis of Hepatic Tumors by Using Contrast Enhancement Patterns at US
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 798 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I.-M. Danet, R. C. Semelka, P. Leonardou, L. Braga, G. Vaidean, J. T. Woosley, and M. Kanematsu
Spectrum of MRI Appearances of Untreated Metastases of the Liver
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 809 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. K. Kang, J. H. Lim, S. H. Kim, D. Choi, H. K. Lim, W. J. Lee, and S. J. Lee
Preoperative Depiction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR Imaging versus Triple-Phase Helical CT
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 79 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Lim, D. Choi, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, W. J. Lee, H. K. Lim, and S. Kim
Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Adding Delayed Phase Imaging to Dual-Phase Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Tanaka, T. Ioka, O. Oshikawa, Y. Hamada, and F. Yoshioka
Dynamic Sonography of Hepatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2001; 177(4): 799 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nino-Murcia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nino-Murcia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, K. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE