Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brander, A. E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kivisaari, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brander, A. E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kivisaari, L. M.
(Radiology. 2000;215:801-806.)
© RSNA, 2000


Head and Neck Imaging

Importance of Thyroid Abnormalities Detected at US Screening: A 5-year Follow-up1

Antti E. E. Brander, MD, Veli P. Viikinkoski, MD, Juha I. Nickels, MD and Leena M. Kivisaari, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, PL 380, 00029 HYKS, Helsinki, Finland (A.E.E.B., L.M.K.); and the Departments of Medicine (V.P.V.) and Pathology (J.I.N.), Hyvinkää District Hospital, Finland. Received August 3, 1998; revision requested November 4; final revision received September 15, 1999; accepted September 24. Address correspondence to A.E.E.B. (e-mail: Antti.Brander@huch.fi).


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To clarify the natural history and frequency of thyroid echo abnormalities in a random adult population by performing a 5-year follow-up study of subjects of a previous thyroid ultrasonographic (US) screening study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the original survey, 253 randomly selected adults were screened by means of thyroid US. US abnormalities were detected in 69 subjects (27%). In the follow-up study, 57 (83%) of those 69 subjects who had abnormalities were reexamined by means of thyroid US, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), blood tests, and clinical examination.

RESULTS: Of 34 individual nodules, 12 (35%) had grown. Biopsy was performed in 10 of them. Nine were benign. One was equivocal, was excised, and proved to be an adenomatous nodule. Eight nodules (24%) had diminished or disappeared. Seven new focal lesions were found in seven subjects (12%). Biopsy was performed in five of these lesions, and they were benign. At 5-year follow-up, no thyroid malignancies were detected among subjects with echo abnormalities at the primary US screening.

CONCLUSION: Thyroid US abnormalities occurring in a random adult population are predominantly benign and clinically unimportant.

Index terms: Thyroid, biopsy, 273.12985, 273.1261 • Thyroid, neoplasms, 273.34, 273.36 • Thyroid, US, 273.12981 • Thyroiditis, 273.292


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Thyroid nodules are clinically important because they are common and because a minority of them represent malignant tumors. The prevalence of thyroid abnormalities in a population and the percentage of malignant tumors among them depend on the population studied and on the method of examination. Palpable nodules occur in most studies in less than 5%–10% of the adult population (14). Malignant tumors occur in up to 10%–20% of palpable nodules that have been selected for surgical treatment (57). The nodules of the surgical series, however, represent the clinically most suspicious group of nodules that have already undergone a high degree of selection. Malignancy is considered clearly more infrequent among random nodular thyroid glands (2,8).

Next to palpation, ultrasonographic (US) examination is currently the basic examination method for patients suspected of having nodular and diffuse thyroid disease. Although US is an appropriate step in evaluating palpable nodules, the role of US is uncertain for detection or follow-up of nonpalpable abnormalities. High-frequency (7–10-MHz) US provides excellent resolution and enables detection of focal thyroid lesions 1–2 mm in diameter (9). The frequency of abnormalities at thyroid US in the adult population is consequently much higher than the frequency of palpable nodules and approaches that at autopsy studies (1012). The natural history and attendant clinical importance of individual lesions detected at US screening are unknown, as no studies with detailed extensive follow-up exist, to our knowledge.

The present study is based on previous US screening aimed at studying the frequency of abnormalities at thyroid US in a random adult population (11). By means of a 5-year follow-up study, we wanted to clarify the natural history of the lesions detected at thyroid US in a random adult population.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
A 5-year follow-up study was performed in the subjects of a previous thyroid US survey (11). The original survey was performed from October 1989 to May 1990 among the citizens of the town of Hyvinkää in southern Finland. Goiter is not considered endemic in the area. The original study population consisted of a random sample of the adult population taken from the city council registry. The sample was collected from the age groups 20–29, 30–39, and 40–49 years by using a computer programmed to include at least 100 persons in each age group and provide a male-to-female ratio of 1:1. The final sample consisted of 253 adult persons (130 women and 123 men; mean age, 35.5 years; age range, 19–50 years).

Abnormal US findings were detected in 69 subjects (27%). Women had significantly more echo abnormalities than men (P < .01), and in both sexes abnormalities increased with age. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was performed in 32 lesions in 30 subjects. No unequivocal malignancies were detected. Since the original survey, two subjects had undergone surgery—one for a solitary lesion with suspicious cytologic findings (class 3; defined later in Materials and Methods), which proved to be a Hürthle cell adenoma, and the other one for a cytologically benign large nodule causing local symptoms, which proved to be an adenomatous nodule. The original study has been reported in detail elsewhere (11).

Subjects with any abnormality differing from the homogeneously hyperechoic echo pattern compared with that of the adjacent muscles in the original study were recruited for a follow-up examination 5 years later. The subjects were informed of the follow-up study in advance by letter, and the examinations were scheduled by telephone. A reminder was mailed if a subject could not be contacted by telephone. It was emphasized that participation in the follow-up study was voluntary and that FNAB and blood tests in some cases would be offered to participants with new lesions or growth of an old lesion.

Of a total of 69 subjects of the original study with abnormal US findings, 57 (83%) participated in the follow-up study. Of the 12 nonparticipants, two had died. The cause of death in both was unrelated to thyroid disease. The present address of two was not found in the council registry; five could not be reached by telephone, although the address was known. Three refused to participate. Omitting the two deceased subjects, participation in the follow-up study was 85%. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.18 years (range, 4.93–5.65 years).

All participants underwent thyroid US examination performed with the use of a real-time scanner equipped with a 7.5-MHz linear transducer (SAL-77A; Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan). All US examinations were performed by the same radiologist (A.E.E.B.). The technique and equipment were similar to that used in the original study. In almost all examinations, an anechoic stand-off pad (Kretztechnik, Zipf, Austria) was used as an aid. The thyroid lobes were screened for the level of echogenicity compared with that of adjacent muscles and any focal abnormalities. A level of echogenicity distinctly higher than that of the muscles was considered normal. All focal lesions were characterized for echogenicity and measured with electronic calipers. The neck was surveyed for enlarged lymph nodes. Comparison was made with the results of the earlier examination, because we aimed to perform biopsy in lesions that had increased in size during the 5-year follow-up, as well as in any new lesions.

In 17 subjects, FNAB of the thyroid was performed with a 22–23-gauge needle by using US guidance, and biopsy of an enlarged lymph node was performed in one subject. All the biopsies were performed by the same radiologist (A.E.E.B).

The aspirates were fixed in alcohol and stained with Papanicolau stain (Danbritt [Schandon], Hampshire, England). All cytologic samples were examined by the same pathologist (J.I.N.) and graded according to Papanicolau into classes 0–5 (13). According to this classification scheme, class 0 indicates inadequate sample; class 1 indicates absence of atypical or abnormal cells; class 2 indicates atypical cytologic findings but no evidence of malignancy; class 3 implies cytologic findings suggestive of, but not conclusive of, malignancy; class 4 cytologic findings are strongly suggestive of malignancy; and class 5 cytologic findings are conclusive for malignancy.

In 49 subjects, tests were performed for determination of thyroid function. The serum levels of thyroxine, or T4 (reference value, 60–160 nmol/L); triiodothyronine, or T3 (reference value, 1.30–2.30 nmol/L); thyrotropin, or TSH (reference value, 0.2–5.0 mIU/L); and thyroglobulin (reference value, 0–50 µg/L), as well as of thyroid antibodies (reference value, <0.4 kIU/L), were determined. The results of the blood tests were interpreted, and 47 subjects were examined clinically by the same internist (V.P.V.). The study design was accepted by the ethical committees of both hospitals (Helsinki University Central Hospital and Hyvinkää District Hospital, Finland) involved. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
US and Cytologic Findings
Macrofollicles.—Macrofollicles, defined as anechoic rounded lesions up to 5 mm in diameter, originally were found in 28 subjects (Fig 1). At follow-up, the number of macrofollicles was unchanged in 14 subjects, including one subject in whom a previously detected macrofollicle had disappeared and a new one had developed (Table 1).



View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Sagittal US image shows an anechoic lesion (arrow) 4 mm in diameter in the left lobe posteriorly (between cursors) in a 50-year-old man. There was no growth in 5 years, the lesion was considered to be a macrofollicle, and no biopsy was performed.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Number of Macrofollicles at 5-Year Follow-up
 
The number of macrofollicles had increased in five subjects who previously had macrofollicles. Ten subjects who originally had no macrofollicles had macrofollicles at follow-up. The number of macrofollicles had decreased in four subjects. In one subject, a mixed echoic, partially cystic nodule had developed at the site of a previously detected macrofollicle. Four subjects with macrofollicles were lost to follow-up.

Anechoic lesions other than macrofollicles.—Seven anechoic lesions other than macrofollicles (Fig 2) originally were found in seven subjects. Two lesions had grown, one from 7 to 11 mm and the other from 7 to 13 mm, and their echo structure had changed so that it could be classified as either mixed echoic or hypoechoic. In both lesions, the cytologic finding was benign both originally and at follow-up (Table 2). In two subjects, the lesion had disappeared; in one, it was unchanged. Two subjects were lost to follow-up.



View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Sagittal US image shows an anechoic nodule (arrow) 9 mm in diameter with posterior echo enhancement in the right lobe in a 36-year-old woman. No biopsy was performed.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. US Appearance of Focal Nodular Lesions and Cytologic Class of Those in Which Biopsy Was Performed
 
Isoechoic lesions.—A circumscribed and locally definable (ie, capsulated) area of the thyroid can differ from the homogeneous echo texture of the thyroid, even though the echo level is not different compared with the general echo level. These are the most difficult and ambiguous lesions to observe and characterize as true lesions by means of US.

Two subjects originally had a total of three isoechoic lesions. The subject with two lesions was lost to follow-up. In the other subject, the isoechoic lesion was no longer perceptible (Table 2).

Hypoechoic lesions.—Twelve subjects originally had 16 focal hypoechoic lesions (Figs 3, 4), and one subject had an enlarged left lobe without individually definable nodules but with a nodular hypoechoic echo structure.



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Sagittal oblique US image shows a hypoechoic nodule (arrows) with class 1 cytologic findings at the original screening in the right lobe in a 48-year-old woman. There was clear growth from 25 to 45 mm in 5 years; biopsy was performed again, and the nodule was class 3. The final histopathologic diagnosis was consistent with an adenomatous nodule with no neoplastic signs. Cursors and dots indicate the line of measurement.

 


View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Sagittal oblique US image shows a hypoechoic nodule (arrow between the two types of cursors) with growth from 8 to 11 mm at 5-year follow-up in the right lobe posteriorly in a 54-year-old man. FNAB results were consistent with class 1 both at the original screening and at follow-up.

 
Five lesions in five subjects had grown. In two lesions with growth from 10 to 16 mm and from 8 to 11 mm, results of FNAB at follow-up were consistent with class 1. In one subject, a solitary hypoechoic nodule had grown distinctly from 25 to 45 mm (Fig 3). In results from two previous FNABs, the cytologic findings were interpreted as class 1 and class 2, but at follow-up the cytologic findings were interpreted as class 3. The nodule was excised surgically, and the final histopathologic diagnosis was an adenomatous nodule with no neoplastic signs. One subject was suspected of having parathyroid hyperplasia, originally with class 1 cytologic findings with cells compatible with parathyroid cells. This lesion had grown from 10 to 13 mm, and biopsy was not performed again. Moreover, biopsy was not performed in a small lesion with growth from 2 to 3 mm.

In two subjects, the US finding was unchanged. One subject had undergone surgery for a lesion with class 3 cytologic findings that proved to be a Hürthle cell adenoma. In three subjects, five lesions, four of which initially had benign FNAB findings, had shrunk. Two subjects, one with three lesions and the other with one lesion, were lost to follow-up.

Mixed echoic lesions.—Three subjects initially had a total of three mixed echoic lesions (Fig 5, Table 2). Two lesions had grown, one from 13 to 18 mm and the other from 12 to 20 mm, but in both lesions the cytologic finding was class 1 both originally and at follow-up. One subject had undergone surgery for a large lesion with local symptoms; it proved to be an adenomatous nodule.



View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. Sagittal US image shows a mixed echoic nodule (arrow) with growth from 13 to 18 mm in 5 years in the left lobe in a 41-year-old woman, but FNAB results were consistent with class 1 both at the original screening and at follow-up. The two types of cursors and the dot between them indicate the line of measurement. The dot in the upper border of the nodule is an artifact.

 
Hyperechoic lesions.—Five subjects originally had a total of five hyperechoic lesions (Fig 6). Three lesions had grown—from 5 to 7 mm, from 12 to 20 mm, and from 5 to 8 mm—but in all of them the cytologic finding was class 1 at follow-up (Table 2). One subject was lost to follow-up. One lesion with an obvious calcification was unchanged.



View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Sagittal oblique US image shows a difficult-to-discern nodule (arrows) 21 mm in diameter in the left lobe in a 42-year-old man. The echogenicity was classified as slightly hyperechoic, although it also could have been classified as isoechoic. Biopsy results were class 1, which is consistent with an adenomatous nodule. The two types of cursors and the dot indicate the line of measurement.

 
Diffuse echo abnormalities.—An echo abnormality was considered diffuse when there was a homogeneous or patchy hypoechoic echo structure compared with normal homogeneous thyroid echo structure, but without a focal nodular character (Fig 7).



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7. Sagittal US image shows a patchy hypoechoic echo pattern (arrows) in the whole left lobe, as well as in the right lobe, without clearly discernible nodules in a 37-year-old woman. Biopsy results from 1990 indicated Hashimoto thyroiditis. At the time of this study, the subject was clinically euthyroid with normal thyroid function values. Biopsy was not performed again.

 
Eleven of the 15 subjects with a diffuse echo abnormality in the original study were reexamined. Eight subjects still had a diffusely abnormal echo structure at follow-up. Five of them had an original FNAB finding consistent with thyroiditis. Biopsy was not performed again, but biopsy was performed in one enlarged lymph node in one subject, and it was benign. One subject had a history of Graves disease since 1988 without cytologic confirmation. One subject initially refusing FNAB later underwent biopsy and had class 1 cytologic findings and no sign of thyroiditis. In one subject, neither FNAB nor blood tests were performed. In three subjects, a diffuse echo abnormality was no longer apparent: FNAB originally showed no sign of thyroiditis in two, and biopsy was not performed in one. Four subjects with a diffuse abnormality were lost to follow-up. Two of them had cytologically confirmed thyroiditis, and one had insufficient cytologic findings but no thyroid antibodies. In one subject, neither FNAB nor a blood test was performed.

New lesions.—Seven new focal lesions were detected in seven subjects (Table 3). Biopsy was performed in five of them, and the cytologic finding was class 1 in all. Biopsy was not performed in the remaining two lesions, mainly because they were small and the subjects preferred follow-up to biopsy; one lesion was a 7-mm isoechoic nodule, and the other was a 3-mm hypoechoic nodule.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. New Lesions
 
Multiple nodules.—Fifteen patients originally had multinodular glands, including subjects with a larger nodule and one or more macrofollicles. At follow-up, 21 subjects had multinodular glands; eight subjects had previously multinodular glands, and 13 had nodules that had been solitary at the original screening.

Associated cervical lymphadenopathy.—Enlarged cervical lymphatic nodes were found in one subject who had diffusely abnormal thyroid echo structure. The cytologic finding of the node in which biopsy was performed was consistent with class 1. In 52 subjects, no lymphadenopathy was found. The status of lymphatic nodes was missing in the US report in four subjects.

Laboratory and Clinical Findings
Forty-nine subjects underwent blood tests for serum levels of thyroxine, thyrotropin, triiodothyronine, thyroglobulin, and thyroid autoantibodies. The mean level of thyroxine was 98 nmol/L ± 19 (SD; range, 68–163 nmol/L), the mean level of triiodothyronine was 1.92 nmol/L ± 0.39 (range, 1.10–3.20 nmol/L), and the mean level of thyrotropin was 1.6 mIU/L ± 1.1 (range, 0.3–6.5 mIU/L). The thyroid autoantibody level was elevated (>0.4 kIU/L) in 11 subjects. The mean thyroglobulin level was 110 µg/L ± 126 (range, 3–622 µg/L). Eighteen subjects had elevated thyroglobulin levels (>100 µg/L).

Forty-seven subjects underwent clinical examination by an internist (V.P.V.). Results of thyroid palpation were abnormal in 12 subjects and normal in 35. Results of palpation were classified as abnormal if any deviation (diffuse enlargement or nodularity) from normal was present.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
The natural history of thyroid nodules occurring in the general adult population is mostly unknown, although their prevalence is known to be high and their malignant potential low (1). In the Framingham study (4), which included 5,127 randomly selected subjects, 218 subjects (4.2%) had thyroid nodules detectable at palpation. After a follow-up of 15 years, no malignancies were found among these lesions. Of the subjects with initially normal thyroid glands, 67 (1.4%) developed nodules during 15 years (4). Grant et al (14) followed up 439 patients with cytologically benign nodules for a mean of 6.1 years; in three patients (0.7%), malignancy was found at follow-up. Results of both of these comprehensive studies indicate a negligible trend of malignant change in benign nodules and a high degree of accuracy of FNAB of the thyroid.

Kuma et al (15) reexamined 134 subjects (of 532 initially) with cytologically benign nodules after 9–11 years. One case (0.9%) turned out to be malignant. Measured by means of US, a decrease in size or disappearance was found in 42%–79% of nodules. Among single and multiple nodules, 21%–23% increased in size. The growth potential of solitary colloid nodules has been estimated by means of US in several series in which the effect of thyroxine-suppressive therapy was assessed. Most of these studies include relatively small samples and short follow-up. Gharib et al (16) reported a statistically nonsignificant shrinkage of 25 nodules in the placebo group after a follow-up of 6 months. In the material of Reverter et al (17), with 20 subjects in the placebo group and mean follow-up 10.6 months, the size of the nodules in the placebo group remained the same. Cheung et al (18) studied 37 nodules (mean follow-up, 1.5 years) and reported spontaneous regression in 35% and growth in 19%.

To our knowledge, no studies including US characterization of lesions and extended follow-up periods are available. The aim of our follow-up study was to check the status of the abnormal US findings after 5 years. Cytologic confirmation was obtained originally in less than half of the subjects with abnormalities, in part because most subjects were asymptomatic and in part because the lesions were generally small. We assumed that even without cytologic confirmation, lack of growth of a lesion during an interval of 5 years could be considered an indication of its probably benign character.

Our series represents a longitudinal study of a random group of thyroid echo abnormalities in the general adult population. Although the number of subjects (n = 57) at follow-up was small, participation (83%) was high and rendered selection bias unlikely. Most reported series in which US was used for accurate characterization and measurement of the lesions were smaller than the present series and represented a selected group of nodules unlike the "average" nodule in the "average" adult.

Macrofollicles are considered to represent dilated follicles (19), an expression of normal heterogeneity of follicular response to thyrotropin stimulation. In our study, their number had increased in five subjects, and 10 subjects with no macrofollicles in the previous study had them at follow-up (altogether 26%). Because macrofollicles are mostly too small for reliable FNAB, biopsy was not performed originally or at follow-up. The only way to rule out definitely the possibility of microcarcinomas in lesions 1–5 mm in diameter would, in our opinion, be surgical excision. As far as we know, no malignancies were reported among entirely anechoic lesions.

The distinction between a small anechoic versus a small hypoechoic lesion at thyroid US is sometimes problematic. In only one subject in our series, a larger nodule had developed at the site of a previous macrofollicle. Larger anechoic lesions more than 5 mm in diameter probably represent adenomatous nodules with cystic degeneration rather than true cysts (Fig 2). Among the various US patterns, the hypoechoic nodules (Figs 3, 4) are considered most susceptible for malignancy (20,21). In our original survey (11), biopsy was performed in 12 of 16 focal hypoechoic lesions. Only one had an equivocal cytologic finding and was excised but proved to be a Hürthle cell adenoma. At follow-up, biopsy was performed in five previously detected and one new hypoechoic lesion. One solitary hypoechoic lesion with benign cytologic findings at the performance of two previous biopsies showed clear growth (Fig 3) and equivocal cytologic findings at a third biopsy; the lesion was excised and proved to be an adenomatous nodule (Table 2).

The general growth potential of the hypoechoic nodules during 5 years seemed to be modest—the shrinkage and anechoic change in some of the nodules could be partly due to results of previous performance of biopsy. Our results seem to indicate that the likelihood of malignancy in hypoechoic nodules detected by means of US in an unselected population is lower than that in clinically apparent hypoechoic nodules selected for surgery. However, the results must be interpreted with caution because of the limited number of hypoechoic nodules in the present series. The malignant potential of the mixed echoic (Fig 5) and hyperechoic lesions is usually considered to be lower than that of the hypoechoic ones. Biopsy was performed again in five mixed echoic or hyperechoic lesions showing growth, but cytologic findings were benign in all of them.

The subjects with diffusely abnormal echo patterns and a cytologic finding of chronic inflammation reflect the known prevalence of occult autoimmune thyroid disease in the general population (3). In all subjects with follow-up in whom the diagnosis of autoimmune thyroiditis was confirmed cytologically, the echo pattern remained abnormal (Table 3). None of them developed hypothyroidism. In childhood autoimmune thyroiditis, Rallison et al (22) reported that there is progression to hypothyroidism in one-third of cases, whereas one-third resolve completely and one-third remain unchanged for decades.

In conclusion, after a 5-year follow-up, no malignancies were detected among 57 (83%) of the original 69 (27%) subjects who had abnormal US findings at screening of a random adult population of 253 subjects. Although our series is restricted with a small number of subjects, the results are in concordance with those of other more comprehensive series (4,14), which indicates that in contrast to nodules selected for surgery, most lesions randomly detected at US of the thyroid are benign.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviation: FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, A.E.E.B.; study concepts, all authors; study design, A.E.E.B., L.M.K.; definition of intellectual content, all authors; literature research, A.E.E.B.; clinical studies, A.E.E.B., V.P.V., J.I.N.; data acquisition and analysis, A.E.E.B., V.P.V., J.I.N.; manuscript preparation, A.E.E.B.; manuscript editing and review, all authors.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Mazzaferri EL. Management of a solitary thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:553-559.[Free Full Text]
  2. Slater S. The occurrence of thyroid nodules in the general population. Arch Intern Med 1956; 98:175-180.
  3. Tunbridge WMG, Evered DC, Hall R, et al. The spectrum of thyroid disease in a community: the Whickham survey. Clin Endocrinol 1977; 7:481-493.[Medline]
  4. Vander JB, Gaston EA, Dawber TR. The significance of nontoxic thyroid nodules: final report of a 15-year study of the incidence of thyroid malignancy. Ann Intern Med 1968; 69:537-540.
  5. Brown L, Kantounis S. The thyroid nodule. Am J Surg 1975; 129:532-536.[Medline]
  6. McCall A, Jarosz H, Lawrence AM, et al. The incidence of thyroid carcinoma in solitary cold nodules and in multinodular goiters. Surgery 1986; 100:1128-1131.[Medline]
  7. Veith FJ, Brooks JR, Grigsby WP, Selenkow HA. The nodular thyroid gland and cancer: a practical approach to the problem. N Engl J Med 1964; 270:431-436.
  8. Christensen SB, Ericsson UB, Janzon L, Tibblin S, Trell E. The prevalence of thyroid disorders in a middle-aged female population, with special reference to the solitary thyroid nodule. Acta Chir Scand 1984; 150:13-19.[Medline]
  9. Stark DD, Clark OH, Gooding GA, Moss AA. High-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography of thyroid lesions in patients with hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 1983; 94:863-868.[Medline]
  10. Horlocker TT, Hay JE, James EM, Reading CC, Charboneau JW. Prevalence of incidental nodular thyroid disease detected during high-resolution parathyroid ultrasonography. In: Medeiros-Neto G, Gaitan E, eds. Frontiers in thyroidology. Vol 2. New York, NY: Plenum Medical, 1986; 1309-1312.
  11. Brander A, Viikinkoski P, Nickels J, Kivisaari L. Thyroid gland: US screening in a random adult population. Radiology 1991; 181:683-687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mortensen JD, Woolner LB, Bennett WA. Gross and microscopic findings in clinically normal thyroid glands. J Clin Endocrinol 1955; 15:1270-1280.
  13. Takahashi M. Color atlas of cancer cytology 2nd ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme, 1981.
  14. Grant CS, Hay ID, Gough IR, McCarthy PM, Goellner JR. Long-term follow-up of patients with benign thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytologic diagnoses. Surgery 1989; 106:980-986.[Medline]
  15. Kuma K, Matsuzuka F, Yokozawa T, Miyauchi A, Sugawara M. Fate of untreated benign thyroid nodules: results of long-term follow-up. World J Surg 1994; 18:495-499.[Medline]
  16. Gharib H, James EM, Charboneau JW, Naessens JM, Offord KP, Gorman CA. Suppressive therapy with levothyroxine for solitary thyroid nodules: a double-blind controlled clinical study. N Engl J Med 1987; 317:70-75.[Abstract]
  17. Reverter JL, Lucas A, Salinas I, Audi L, Foz M, Sanmarti A. Suppressive therapy with levothyroxine for solitary thyroid nodules. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1992; 36:25-28.[Medline]
  18. Cheung PSY, Lee JMH, Boey JH. Thyroxine suppressive therapy of benign solitary thyroid nodules: a prospective randomized study. World J Surg 1989; 13:818-822.[Medline]
  19. Katz JF, Kane RA, Reyes J, Clarke MP, Hill TC. Thyroid nodules: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1984; 151:741-745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Solbiati L, Volterrani L, Rizzatto G, et al. The thyroid gland with low uptake lesions: evaluation by ultrasound. Radiology 1985; 155:187-191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Simeone JF, Daniels GH, Mueller PR, et al. High-resolution real-time sonography of the thyroid. Radiology 1982; 145:431-435.[Free Full Text]
  22. Rallison ML, Dobyns BM, Meikle AW, Bishop M, Lyon JL, Stevens W. Natural history of thyroid abnormalities: prevalence, incidence and regression of thyroid diseases in adolescents and young adults. Am J Med 1991; 91:363-370.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. M. Baron, J. Seekins, M. Hernanz-Schulman, C. Yu, and J. H. Kan
Utility of Total Lower Extremity Radiography Investigation of Nonweight Bearing in the Young Child
Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): e817 - e820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. Y. Yoon, J. W. Lee, S. K. Chang, C. S. Choi, E. J. Yun, Y. L. Seo, K. H. Kim, and H. S. Hwang
Peripheral Calcification in Thyroid Nodules: Ultrasonographic Features and Prediction of Malignancy
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1349 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. K. Hoang, W. K. Lee, M. Lee, D. Johnson, and S. Farrell
US Features of Thyroid Malignancy: Pearls and Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 847 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder and M. Gonen
Screening for Cancer with PET and PET/CT: Potential and Limitations
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 4S - 18S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. K. Oh, J. S. Park, and E.-K. Kim
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W449 - W450.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
K. Krohn, D. Fuhrer, Y. Bayer, M. Eszlinger, V. Brauer, S. Neumann, and R. Paschke
Molecular Pathogenesis of Euthyroid and Toxic Multinodular Goiter
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2005; 26(4): 504 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Liebeskind, A. G. Sikora, A. Komisar, D. Slavit, and K. Fried
Rates of Malignancy in Incidentally Discovered Thyroid Nodules Evaluated With Sonography and Fine-Needle Aspiration
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 629 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. K. Alexander, S. Hurwitz, J. P. Heering, C. B. Benson, M. C. Frates, P. M. Doubilet, E. S. Cibas, P R. Larsen, and E. Marqusee
Natural History of Benign Solid and Cystic Thyroid Nodules
Ann Intern Med, February 18, 2003; 138(4): 315 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. C. Frates, C. B. Benson, P. M. Doubilet, E. S. Cibas, and E. Marqusee
Can Color Doppler Sonography Aid in the Prediction of Malignancy of Thyroid Nodules?
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2003; 22(2): 127 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E.-K. Kim, C. S. Park, W. Y. Chung, K. K. Oh, D. I. Kim, J. T. Lee, and H. S. Yoo
New Sonographic Criteria for Recommending Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Nonpalpable Solid Nodules of the Thyroid
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 687 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brander, A. E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kivisaari, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brander, A. E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kivisaari, L. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE