Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courchesne, E.
Right arrow Articles by Press, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Courchesne, E.
Right arrow Articles by Press, G. A.
(Radiology. 2000;216:672-682.)
© RSNA, 2000


Neuroradiology

Normal Brain Development and Aging: Quantitative Analysis at in Vivo MR Imaging in Healthy Volunteers1

Eric Courchesne, PhD, Heather J. Chisum, BA, Jeanne Townsend, PhD, Angilene Cowles, BA, James Covington, MA, Brian Egaas, MS, Mark Harwood, BA, Stuart Hinds, MD and Gary A. Press, MD

1 From the Laboratory for Research on the Neuroscience of Autism, Children’s Hospital Research Center, 8110 La Jolla Shores Dr, Suite 201, La Jolla, CA 92037 (E.C., H.J.C., J.T., A.C., J.C., B.E., M.H., S.H.); the Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla (E.C., J.T.); and the Kaiser Permanente Hospital, San Diego, Calif (G.A.P.). Received April 5, 1999; revision requested June 7; final revision received December 7; accepted December 21. This work is supported by funds from NINDS (2-RO1-NS-19855) awarded to Eric Courchesne and NINDS (5RO1-NS-34155) award to Jeanne Townsend. Address correspondence to E.C. (e-mail: ecourchesne@ucsd.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To quantitate neuroanatomic parameters in healthy volunteers and to compare the values with normative values from postmortem studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance (MR) images of 116 volunteers aged 19 months to 80 years were analyzed with semiautomated procedures validated by means of comparison with manual tracings. Volumes measured included intracranial space, whole brain, gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Results were compared with values from previous postmortem studies.

RESULTS: Whole brain and intracranial space grew by 25%–27% between early childhood (mean age, 26 months; age range, 19–33 months) and adolescence (mean age, 14 years; age range, 12–15 years); thereafter, whole-brain volume decreased such that volunteers (age range, 71–80 years) had volumes similar to those of young children. GM increased 13% from early to later (6–9 years) childhood. Thereafter, GM increased more slowly and reached a plateau in the 4th decade; it decreased by 13% in the oldest volunteers. The GM-WM ratio decreased exponentially from early childhood through the 4th decade; thereafter, it gradually declined. In vivo patterns of change in the intracranial space, whole brain, and GM-WM ratio agreed with published postmortem data.

CONCLUSION: MR images accurately depict normal patterns of age-related change in intracranial space, whole brain, GM, WM, and CSF. These quantitative MR imaging data can be used in research studies and clinical settings for the detection of abnormalities in fundamental neuroanatomic parameters.

Index terms: Aging • Brain, growth and development, 10.91 • Brain, MR, 10.121411, 10.12142 • Brain, volume, 10.91 • Magnetic resonance (MR), volume measurement, 10.121411, 10.12142


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Knowledge of the course of normal brain development and aging provides the foundation for the recognition of pathologic brain development and decline. Quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies have provided such information for a number of specific brain structures (eg, cerebrum, corpus callosum, cerebellum, brainstem, hippocampus) (118) but only for limited age windows and never for the entire life span from early childhood to late adulthood. Moreover, several fundamental indicators of normal brain development—volumes of intracranial space, whole brain, gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)—have yet to be thoroughly documented by using contemporary, quantitative, and radiologic methods in a large group of healthy young children.

Even in the postmortem literature, there is a paucity of information on the parameters of brain development. For example, one study of postmortem specimens (19) provided measures of intracranial volume from birth through the age of 20 years, but for only males (see table 115 in the article by Blinkov and Glezer [19]), while another (20) provided such measures separately for both boys and girls, but for only the narrower age group of 2.5–8 years. In another study (21), intracranial volume was estimated from measures of the external height, width, and circumference of the skull. Since the routine method for measuring brain weight at autopsy includes the weight of CSF within the leptomeninges and the weight of parenchyma, in the postmortem literature, age-related changes in CSF may confound estimates of developmental changes in parenchyma. Furthermore, postmortem swelling and/or shrinkage due to fixation may introduce artifacts into measures of fresh or fixed postmortem brains (19).

Both postmortem and in vivo imaging studies (13,2228) have demonstrated that, with advancing age, brain weight or volume, GM, and GM-WM ratios decrease and CSF volume increases. However, the timing of such age-related decreases and increases is uncertain. Transitions from growth-related increases to age-related decreases in several fundamental neuroanatomic parameters have been incompletely documented with in vivo MR imaging because developmental studies have commonly included samples of only children and adolescents or young adults, while aging studies have commonly included samples of only adults. Comparison of the neuroanatomic volume changes in developmental studies with those in aging studies would not help to resolve the timing of developmental and aging transitions because different imaging, measurement, and quantitative procedures were used. Also, while many aging studies included healthy volunteers, most studies of development included patients.

To our knowledge, there exist no published, quantitative, in vivo MR imaging studies of normal brain changes in the life span from early childhood (1 or 2 years of age) to late adulthood. We used currently available MR imaging procedures to accurately and objectively document the normal course of development and aging in whole brain, GM, WM, CSF, and intracranial volumes in male and female healthy volunteers aged 19 months through 80 years. Quantitation of these parameters in healthy volunteers allowed us to compare these values with published values in the postmortem literature.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Volunteers
The institutional review board of the Children’s Hospital of San Diego, Calif, approved the neuropsychological testing procedures and imaging protocols used in our study. One hundred sixteen healthy volunteers (79 male, 37 female) were aged 19 months to 80 years (mean age, 21.4 years ± 20 [SD]); 50 of these volunteers were aged 19 months to 12 years. The ethnic distribution of the patients was as follows: 99 (85%) white, 10 (9%) Hispanic American, two and a half (2%) Asian American, three and a half (3%) African American, and one (1%) unknown, where volunteers of mixed ethnicity were counted as half in each group.

Intelligence quotient (IQ) data were available for 86 of the 116 volunteers and revealed that IQ was comparable across the age range of the sample. Composite IQ scores obtained with the Stanford-Binet test (29) in 25 volunteers younger than 6 years was 95–141 (116.3 ± 11.0). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised or Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III full-scale IQ scores (30,31) for 33 volunteers aged 6 to 16 years were 90–133 (112.7 ± 11.0). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III full-scale IQ scores (32,33) for 36 volunteers older than 16 years were 90–137 (115.6 ± 14.0).

To screen for signs of memory loss, volunteers older than 50 years underwent the California Verbal Learning Test (34). All volunteers performed this test in the normal or well-above-normal range. (Standardized scores based on age norms, or T scores, for overall performance were 42–66 [55.1 ± 7.0].)

Volunteers were recruited by means of advertisements distributed in the community. On the basis of their responses to questionnaires administered at screening before MR imaging about medical, family, and educational history, volunteers showed no evidence of developmental, educational, medical, psychological, or psychiatric abnormalities or deficiencies. Prior to testing, the nature of the study and the procedures were explained to each volunteer, and informed consent was obtained. For each volunteer younger than 18 years, informed consent was obtained from a parent.

Imaging
MR images were acquired by using a 1.5-T Signa MR unit (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). To provide images for the computation of CSF, GM, and WM volumes, a dual spin-echo intermediate- and T2-weighted sequence was performed in the transverse plane (3,000/30 and 80 [repetition time msec/echo time msec], one signal acquired, 20-cm field of view, 256 x 256 matrix, 3-mm interleaved [no gaps]). No medication or sedation was used during the imaging procedure. To help ensure that younger children remained still for imaging, scanning was performed during natural sleep. Occasionally, the staff would pacify younger children who were not sleeping by singing to them during the MR imaging examination. The MR imaging data were transferred in digital format to workstations (Silicon Graphics; Mountain View, Calif) for analysis. All images were coded so that the operators (H.J.C., A.C., J.C.) were blinded to each volunteer’s identity, sex, and age.

Automated Correction for Signal Falloff
Images were preprocessed (by B.E.) by using SEGMENT (Egaas B and Courchesne E, San Diego, Calif) to correct for decreased signal intensity toward the inferior sections by using a fully automated algorithm. In this algorithm, pixels in the lowest signal intensity range (ie, bone of the skull base, air in the sinuses) were automatically excluded prior to calculation of the difference in the mean signal intensity of the remaining pixels between pairs of consecutive section locations. Then, on the basis of a higher-order polynomial best fit of those difference values, a separate gain coefficient for each section was derived and applied to each section so that the mean signal intensity of adjacent sections differed by less than 1%. The gain coefficient was constant within a section, and the same coefficient was applied to corresponding intermediate- and T2-weighted images. Next, semiautomated and fully automated steps were used to remove skull and extracranial structures and to classify GM, WM, and CSF as follows.

Semiautomated Removal of Skull and Extracranial Structures
In all volunteers, skull and extracranial structures were removed from the T2-weighted images with a semiautomated procedure that used a computer algorithm called "brain removal" (S.H.) and with decision making by experienced neuroanatomists (H.J.C., A.C., J.C.) in a section-by-section process. One of the operators set the initial threshold level on each T2-weighted image to separate the higher signal intensity of the brain and CSF from the lower signal intensity of the skull and air. Next, manual tracing was performed to separate contiguous nonbrain pixels from brain or CSF pixels with similar signal intensity values. The remaining intracranial pixels (ie, all brain and CSF pixels) were selected by using an automated region-growing algorithm that retained the original signal intensity values of all intracranial pixels (Fig 1a). The final T2-weighted images that depicted only brain and CSF were used as a mask on the original intermediate-weighted images to automatically obtain the corresponding intermediate-weighted images of only brain and CSF (Fig 1b). The entire process was completed in less than 45 minutes per brain.



View larger version (174K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. Images and graphs illustrate how SEGMENT, a fully automated algorithm, uses (a) T2- and (b) intermediate-weighted images to plot all pixels as (c) a global histogram in a T2-weighted (x axis) versus intermediate-weighted (PD; y axis) feature space. SEGMENT then uses an algorithm with maximum likelihood criteria to classify pixel clusters as brain, CSF, CSF partially volumed with skull (cluster not shown in figure), or other (nonbrain). Next, for all pixels classified as brain, SEGMENT uses a three-dimensional local-contrast algorithm to separate GM and WM pixels, which creates (d) final GM-, WM-, and CSF-segmented images. For qualitative comparison, manual tracings of T2- and intermediate-weighted pairs of images (eg, see tracings in a and b) were overlaid onto SEGMENT-created images (tracing in d). (e) Validation of SEGMENT was accomplished by means of statistical comparison with results from manual tracing; analyses showed that GM and WM measures obtained by using SEGMENT and manual-tracing methods correlated to 98.2% and 96.1%, respectively.

 


View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. Images and graphs illustrate how SEGMENT, a fully automated algorithm, uses (a) T2- and (b) intermediate-weighted images to plot all pixels as (c) a global histogram in a T2-weighted (x axis) versus intermediate-weighted (PD; y axis) feature space. SEGMENT then uses an algorithm with maximum likelihood criteria to classify pixel clusters as brain, CSF, CSF partially volumed with skull (cluster not shown in figure), or other (nonbrain). Next, for all pixels classified as brain, SEGMENT uses a three-dimensional local-contrast algorithm to separate GM and WM pixels, which creates (d) final GM-, WM-, and CSF-segmented images. For qualitative comparison, manual tracings of T2- and intermediate-weighted pairs of images (eg, see tracings in a and b) were overlaid onto SEGMENT-created images (tracing in d). (e) Validation of SEGMENT was accomplished by means of statistical comparison with results from manual tracing; analyses showed that GM and WM measures obtained by using SEGMENT and manual-tracing methods correlated to 98.2% and 96.1%, respectively.

 


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1c. Images and graphs illustrate how SEGMENT, a fully automated algorithm, uses (a) T2- and (b) intermediate-weighted images to plot all pixels as (c) a global histogram in a T2-weighted (x axis) versus intermediate-weighted (PD; y axis) feature space. SEGMENT then uses an algorithm with maximum likelihood criteria to classify pixel clusters as brain, CSF, CSF partially volumed with skull (cluster not shown in figure), or other (nonbrain). Next, for all pixels classified as brain, SEGMENT uses a three-dimensional local-contrast algorithm to separate GM and WM pixels, which creates (d) final GM-, WM-, and CSF-segmented images. For qualitative comparison, manual tracings of T2- and intermediate-weighted pairs of images (eg, see tracings in a and b) were overlaid onto SEGMENT-created images (tracing in d). (e) Validation of SEGMENT was accomplished by means of statistical comparison with results from manual tracing; analyses showed that GM and WM measures obtained by using SEGMENT and manual-tracing methods correlated to 98.2% and 96.1%, respectively.

 


View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1d. Images and graphs illustrate how SEGMENT, a fully automated algorithm, uses (a) T2- and (b) intermediate-weighted images to plot all pixels as (c) a global histogram in a T2-weighted (x axis) versus intermediate-weighted (PD; y axis) feature space. SEGMENT then uses an algorithm with maximum likelihood criteria to classify pixel clusters as brain, CSF, CSF partially volumed with skull (cluster not shown in figure), or other (nonbrain). Next, for all pixels classified as brain, SEGMENT uses a three-dimensional local-contrast algorithm to separate GM and WM pixels, which creates (d) final GM-, WM-, and CSF-segmented images. For qualitative comparison, manual tracings of T2- and intermediate-weighted pairs of images (eg, see tracings in a and b) were overlaid onto SEGMENT-created images (tracing in d). (e) Validation of SEGMENT was accomplished by means of statistical comparison with results from manual tracing; analyses showed that GM and WM measures obtained by using SEGMENT and manual-tracing methods correlated to 98.2% and 96.1%, respectively.

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1e. Images and graphs illustrate how SEGMENT, a fully automated algorithm, uses (a) T2- and (b) intermediate-weighted images to plot all pixels as (c) a global histogram in a T2-weighted (x axis) versus intermediate-weighted (PD; y axis) feature space. SEGMENT then uses an algorithm with maximum likelihood criteria to classify pixel clusters as brain, CSF, CSF partially volumed with skull (cluster not shown in figure), or other (nonbrain). Next, for all pixels classified as brain, SEGMENT uses a three-dimensional local-contrast algorithm to separate GM and WM pixels, which creates (d) final GM-, WM-, and CSF-segmented images. For qualitative comparison, manual tracings of T2- and intermediate-weighted pairs of images (eg, see tracings in a and b) were overlaid onto SEGMENT-created images (tracing in d). (e) Validation of SEGMENT was accomplished by means of statistical comparison with results from manual tracing; analyses showed that GM and WM measures obtained by using SEGMENT and manual-tracing methods correlated to 98.2% and 96.1%, respectively.

 
The lowest section that matched the external morphology of the inferior medulla rather than the cervical spinal cord was chosen as the inferior boundary of the brain; external landmarks, such as the vertebral arteries, were not consistent among volunteers and did not provide reliable landmarks for the identification of the inferior boundary of the brain. All brain tissue and CSF spaces at or above the level of the lowest section, including the pituitary and infundibulum, were selected. Excluded from the intracranial measure were the skull, subcutaneous and orbital fat, mastoid and nasal sinuses, dural venous sinuses, larger blood vessels beyond the surface of the brain, bony protuberances (ie, dorsum sellae), and cranial nerve roots, since they extend beyond the surface of the brain. Interoperator reliability was R > .99 (P < .001), and the mean percentage difference between operators was 0.22%, with a maximum difference in any brain of 1.47%.

Anatomically, then, whole brain volume was defined as all brainstem, infundibular and pituitary, cerebellar, subcortical, and cerebral parenchyma. Total intracranial CSF volume was defined as all CSF in ventricular and subarachnoid spaces, and intracranial space volume was defined as the sum of whole brain and CSF volumes.

Automatic Classification of GM, WM, and CSF
In the next step of the SEGMENT process with each brain data set, all pixels (including all skull and extracranial pixels) were used to form a global histogram in a intermediate-weighted (y axis) versus T2-weighted (x axis) feature space (Fig 1c). Each cluster (Fig 1c) was mathematically mapped as a joint Gaussian distribution in this intermediate- and T2-weighted feature space; the location and orientation of each cluster may be visualized as an ellipse that has major axis points oriented toward the origin (where the signal intensity values of intermediate- and T2-weighted images both equal 0). By using a maximum likelihood criteria algorithm based on previous approaches (35), all pixels were then automatically classified (by B.E.) as parenchyma (WM and GM clusters in Fig 1c), CSF (CSF cluster in Fig 1c), CSF partially volumed with skull (cluster not shown), or other (ie, all remaining nonparenchymal and non-CSF pixels [eg, nonbrain clusters in Fig 1c]).

All parenchymal pixels were then automatically separated into GM and WM pixels (by B.E.) with a three-dimensional local-contrast algorithm SEGMENT. With this algorithm, the local threshold for GM and WM pixels was computed from pixel statistics within a 2 x 2 x 2-cm cube surrounding the pixel being classified. (The cube was 29 pixels x 29 pixels x 7 sections, or 5,887 surrounding voxels.) The use of this local contrast makes segmentation relatively insensitive to the signal intensity inhomogeneities intrinsic to imaging that plague simpler methods of segmentation, such as uniform thresholding over an entire section. In particular, this method successfully handles the signal intensity reductions often found at the occipital pole and lateral extent of the temporal lobes.

Pixels that the three-dimensional local contrast algorithm determined to be mostly WM were classified as WM, and pixels determined to be mostly GM were classified as GM. This classification preserved a sharp outline between the cortical ribbon and adjacent axonal material (Fig 1d). The approach is analogous to the previous approaches that use feature space in the semiautomated segmentation of pixels on images with nearly identical intermediate- and T2-weighted protocols (28,36); the principal difference is that the present algorithm is fully automated.

Validation of the Automated Classification Algorithm
The automated classification was validated by using randomly selected images of eight brains from those of the study group without any foreknowledge of image quality; they included images in five male and three female young children and adults. In each brain, all GM, WM, and CSF spaces within the right hemibrain were manually traced (by H.J.C.) from the T2- and intermediate-weighted images at the following three section levels—the centrum semiovale, the thalamus and basal ganglia, and the pons (see Fig 1a, 1b for tracings in one section of one brain). The area was calculated for pixels designated as GM, WM, or CSF within each manual tracing of each section. Manually traced and automatically segmented tissue classifications were compared by means of qualitative visual examination and quantitative statistical analysis.

Visual examination was performed (by E.C., G.A.P., H.J.C., and B.E.) by overlaying the results of the manual tracings onto the automatically classified images (Fig 1d). Correspondence between automated and manual approaches was evaluated in the cerebrum, cerebellum, globus pallidus, lateral thalamus, substantia nigra, and red nucleus. Since the combined volume of these subcortical structures accounts for approximately 1% of total brain volume (12), a modest measurement error in these structures will result in an error of much less than 1% in the whole brain, GM, and WM volumes calculated in our study.

In an additional validation step, the experienced neuroanatomist (H.J.C.) manually traced cortical GM on 20 sections in a ninth brain using the intermediate- and T2-weighted images; measures from these manual tracings and those of the automated classification were statistically compared.

That these fully automated (SEGMENT) and semiautomated steps resulted in valid brain measures is further supported by the results described later that showed comparable age-related changes in intracranial space volume in MR imaging and postmortem studies, comparable changes in the mean intracranial space volume in adolescents and adults, comparable estimates of whole brain weight, and comparable age-related changes in the GM-WM ratio.

Calculation of Intracranial, Whole Brain, CSF, GM, and WM Volumes
Each two-dimensional pixel on the images represents a three-dimensional volume (voxel), and the intracranial space volume was determined by summing the volume of all voxels designated as GM, WM, and CSF and half of the volume of all voxels designated as CSF partially volumed with skull. Whole brain volume was determined in a similar fashion by using only GM and WM voxels. Total CSF volume was constructed from the full volume of CSF voxels and half of the volume of all voxels designated as CSF partially volumed with skull.

Estimation of Brain Weight at MR Imaging
At autopsy, it is common practice to weigh brains with the leptomeninges and ventricles intact, trapping CSF within and around the brain. Therefore, to compare brain size at in vivo MR imaging with brain size in postmortem studies, it is necessary to obtain an estimation of brain weights from MR imaging-derived measures that are comparable to normative brain weights published in the postmortem literature. This estimation can be performed by converting MR imaging–derived volumes of parenchyma (ie, whole brain) and CSF into grams per milliliter and then by summing these values as follows: brain weight in grams = (whole brain volume in milliliters x 1.0365 g/mL) + (CSF volume in milliliters x 1.00 g/mL) (37,38).

Statistical Analyses of Volume Measurement Data
One author (J.T.) ensured the use of the appropriate statistical tests. Statistical analysis was performed (by J.T.) with the Biomedical Statistical Software Package, or BMDP (SPSS; Berkeley, Calif) (39). Statistical probabilities reported for regression analyses were tests of significance for the orthogonal polynomial regression coefficients.

Comparison of the change with age in our in vivo brain volume estimates and the brain weight measures obtained from published postmortem data involved the use of standard regression analyses with effect coding in an evaluation of both linear and quadratic differences with age between the in vivo MR imaging data and postmortem data (40). Independent variables in these analyses were study type (postmortem or in vivo MR imaging), linear and quadratic age factors, interactions of study type, and linear and quadratic age. Measures from the 11 published postmortem studies (see tables 111, 113, 115, 117, and 119 in reference 19) (4146) cited here for comparison were available as only means (for various age groups) and not as individual data points. In our analyses, we assumed that these means were robust and that they represented the data of an individual at the given age. A P value of .05 indicated a statistically significant difference.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Intracranial Space
Age-related change in intracranial space is shown in Figure 2a. Intracranial space volume grew exponentially by 27% between early childhood (mean age, 26 months; age range, 19–33 months) and early adolescence (mean age, 14.0 years; age range, 12–15 years), when the developmental maximum was reached (linear component, R = 0.58, R2 = 0.34, t58 = 5.48, P < .001; quadratic component, change in R2 = 0.06, t57 = 2.37, P < .05) (Fig 2a). In the age range of 16–80 years, there was no statistically significant change in intracranial space volume. Across all ages, intracranial space volumes were about 10% smaller in female volunteers than in males volunteers (1,305.7 mL ± 106 vs 1,450.5 mL ± 137, t114 = 5.68, P < .001).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Graphs depict age-related volume changes in (a) intracranial space and (b) whole brain in our 116 healthy volunteers. Volume intercepts at birth are based on quantitative MR imaging findings of Huppi et al (55). (c) Graph shows that our in vivo age-related intracranial space growth rates are similar to those of previous postmortem studies (table 115 in the study by Blinkov and Glezer [19]; Lichtenberg [20]). (d) Graph shows similar growth rates in our in vivo whole brain volume (red symbols), estimated in vivo whole brain weight (black symbols; estimated whole brain weight = brain weight + CSF weight), and brain weight (open symbols) from 11 previously published postmortem studies (tables 111, 113, 115, 117, 119 in reference 19) (41-46). In the present study and in each published study, volume or weight at each age is plotted as a function of a percentage of the maximum volume or weight for that study. Postmortem weight includes CSF, but our in vivo MR imaging whole brain volume does not. Therefore, during development, CSF weight makes a small contribution to the reported brain weight, but, with aging, its weight makes a successively greater contribution. (On x axes, age scales change after 20-year point.)

 


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Graphs depict age-related volume changes in (a) intracranial space and (b) whole brain in our 116 healthy volunteers. Volume intercepts at birth are based on quantitative MR imaging findings of Huppi et al (55). (c) Graph shows that our in vivo age-related intracranial space growth rates are similar to those of previous postmortem studies (table 115 in the study by Blinkov and Glezer [19]; Lichtenberg [20]). (d) Graph shows similar growth rates in our in vivo whole brain volume (red symbols), estimated in vivo whole brain weight (black symbols; estimated whole brain weight = brain weight + CSF weight), and brain weight (open symbols) from 11 previously published postmortem studies (tables 111, 113, 115, 117, 119 in reference 19) (41-46). In the present study and in each published study, volume or weight at each age is plotted as a function of a percentage of the maximum volume or weight for that study. Postmortem weight includes CSF, but our in vivo MR imaging whole brain volume does not. Therefore, during development, CSF weight makes a small contribution to the reported brain weight, but, with aging, its weight makes a successively greater contribution. (On x axes, age scales change after 20-year point.)

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. Graphs depict age-related volume changes in (a) intracranial space and (b) whole brain in our 116 healthy volunteers. Volume intercepts at birth are based on quantitative MR imaging findings of Huppi et al (55). (c) Graph shows that our in vivo age-related intracranial space growth rates are similar to those of previous postmortem studies (table 115 in the study by Blinkov and Glezer [19]; Lichtenberg [20]). (d) Graph shows similar growth rates in our in vivo whole brain volume (red symbols), estimated in vivo whole brain weight (black symbols; estimated whole brain weight = brain weight + CSF weight), and brain weight (open symbols) from 11 previously published postmortem studies (tables 111, 113, 115, 117, 119 in reference 19) (41-46). In the present study and in each published study, volume or weight at each age is plotted as a function of a percentage of the maximum volume or weight for that study. Postmortem weight includes CSF, but our in vivo MR imaging whole brain volume does not. Therefore, during development, CSF weight makes a small contribution to the reported brain weight, but, with aging, its weight makes a successively greater contribution. (On x axes, age scales change after 20-year point.)

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2d. Graphs depict age-related volume changes in (a) intracranial space and (b) whole brain in our 116 healthy volunteers. Volume intercepts at birth are based on quantitative MR imaging findings of Huppi et al (55). (c) Graph shows that our in vivo age-related intracranial space growth rates are similar to those of previous postmortem studies (table 115 in the study by Blinkov and Glezer [19]; Lichtenberg [20]). (d) Graph shows similar growth rates in our in vivo whole brain volume (red symbols), estimated in vivo whole brain weight (black symbols; estimated whole brain weight = brain weight + CSF weight), and brain weight (open symbols) from 11 previously published postmortem studies (tables 111, 113, 115, 117, 119 in reference 19) (41-46). In the present study and in each published study, volume or weight at each age is plotted as a function of a percentage of the maximum volume or weight for that study. Postmortem weight includes CSF, but our in vivo MR imaging whole brain volume does not. Therefore, during development, CSF weight makes a small contribution to the reported brain weight, but, with aging, its weight makes a successively greater contribution. (On x axes, age scales change after 20-year point.)

 
Figure 2c shows growth in intracranial space based on our data obtained with in vivo quantitative MR imaging procedures plotted with postmortem intracranial space volumes reported in two previous developmental studies (see table 115 in reference 19) (20). Age-related changes in intracranial space volume in our in vivo study and in these previous postmortem studies closely match (Fig 2c).

Whole Brain Volume
Age-related change in whole brain volume is shown in Figure 2b. Whole brain volume grew exponentially by 25% between early childhood (19–33 months) and adolescence (12–15 years), when the developmental maximum volume was reached (linear component, R = 0.53, R2 = 0.28, t58 = 4.72, P < .001; quadratic component, change in R2 = 0.06, t57 = 2.22, P < .05) (Fig 2b). In the age range of 16–80 years, whole brain volume slowly but steadily declined so that in those aged 71–80 years, it had dropped by 26% and was smaller than that of healthy 2- or 3-year-old children (linear component, R = 0.57, R2 = 0.32, t54 = 5.09, P < .001; quadratic component, change in R2 = 0.06, t53 = 2.28, P < .05). Across all ages, whole brain volumes were about 12% smaller in female volunteers than in male volunteers (1,137.8 mL ± 109 vs 1,286.4 mL ± 133, t114 = 5.92, P < .001).

Figure 2d depicts a graph of age-related changes in postmortem brain weight from 11 studies (see tables 111, 113, 115, 117, and 119 in reference 19) (4146), age-related changes in our in vivo whole brain volumes (brain only), and our estimated in vivo whole brain weights (estimated brain weight + CSF weight; see Materials and Methods). For each study, weight or volume at each age was plotted as a function of a percentage of the maximum weight or volume for that study (eg, for our study, the maximum was achieved at 12–15 years of age).

The graph and statistical analyses showed no difference in change with age between postmortem data and our in vivo estimated whole brain weight. Regression analysis with effect coding for study type (see Materials and Methods, Statistical Analyses of Volume Measurement Data) yielded a model in which there were significant linear and quadratic components in the association of age with brain weight (R = 0.40, F2,224 = 21.85, P < .001, linear coefficient t = 5.44, P < .001; quadratic coefficient t = 6.56, P < .001 [Fig 2d]). There was no association between study type (postmortem weight, in vivo estimated weight) and brain weight, and there were no significant interactions between study type and age. The correlations of brain weight with study type was 0.16, and the interaction of study type with linear age and quadratic age was 0.003 and -0.27, respectively. A regression model with study type, linear age with study type interaction, and quadratic age with study type interaction as independent variables showed no relationship between these factors and brain weight (R2 = 0.005).

The graph and statistical analyses showed similar changes in growth but not aging in the postmortem data and in our in vivo brain volume. A comparison of postmortem brain weight and whole brain volume (only GM and WM) at MR imaging showed significant differences in the rate of change with age as a function of the study type (postmortem weight, in vivo whole brain volume). This difference was due to the increase in CSF and the complementary decrease in whole brain volume with aging seen in the MR imaging measures but not in the postmortem measures of weight, which included the weight of CSF. By using the same set of independent variables as those used in the previous analysis, the model of best fit selected study type, the quadratic age component, and the interaction between study type and linear age (R = 0.56, F3,223 = 34.53, P < .001; quadratic age coefficient, t = 8.25, P < .001; study-type coefficient, t = 4.45, P < .001; study-type and linear-age interaction coefficient, t = 6.28, P < .001) (Fig 2d).

In addition, in the present study, the mean estimated brain weight from in vivo MR imaging data was 1,527 g ± 120 for male adolescents and adults (age range, 16–43 years) and 1,363 g ± 99 for female adolescents and adults (age range, 17–49 years). These MR imaging–derived estimates of brain weight were about 4% greater than the mean brain weights reported for male and female participants in six different postmortem normative studies involving more than 6,000 participants aged 17–44 years (table 118 in reference 19) (4143,47,48). In those six studies, the median of the mean brain weight was 1,460 g ± 113 in male participants (range of study means, 1,443–1,504 g) and 1,305 g ± 106 in female participants (range of study means, 1,288–1,398 g). The small 4% difference between our in vivo estimated brain weight and the postmortem weight may be due to sampling differences or to secular increases in brain size in the past several decades. Alternatively, it may be that our slightly greater estimate in the living brain reflects the fact that, in living brain, 2%–3% of its volume is blood most of which is in GM capillaries (19).

GM Volume
Age-related change in GM is shown in Figure 3a. GM increased 13% from early childhood (19–33 months) to later childhood (6–9 years) (linear component, R = 0.37, R2 = 0.14, t41 = 2.64, P < .05). Thereafter, it decreased linearly by approximately 5% per decade throughout life (linear component, R = 0.75, R2 = 0.57, t71 = 9.63, P < .001) (Fig 3a). The percentage of GM contributing to intracranial space volume was not different in male and female volunteers (female volunteers, 58.5% ± 0.08%; male volunteers, 59.9% ± 0.07%).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Graphs depict growth and aging changes in (a) GM and (b) WM volumes in 116 living healthy volunteers. Volume intercepts at birth are based on the findings of Huppi et al (55). (On x axes, age scales change after 20-year point.) GM volume reached a maximum by 6-9 years of age and thereafter declined linearly. WM volume rapidly increased until 12-15 years of age, and thereafter increased at a slower rate to a plateau at about the 4th decade of life. For both (c) the present in vivo and (d) the published MR imaging and postmortem data, the GW-WM ratio drops sharply from infancy to about the end of adolescence after which it declines at a slower rate. Symbols in d represent data from the postmortem studies of Anton (49) (), Jaeger (50) ({lozenge}), and Miller et al (25) (*) and the MR imaging studies of Filipek et al (51) ({blacksquare} = data in males, {square} = data in females), Pfefferbaum et al (27) ({triangledown}), and Narayana and Borthakur (52) ({boxtimes}).

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Graphs depict growth and aging changes in (a) GM and (b) WM volumes in 116 living healthy volunteers. Volume intercepts at birth are based on the findings of Huppi et al (55). (On x axes, age scales change after 20-year point.) GM volume reached a maximum by 6-9 years of age and thereafter declined linearly. WM volume rapidly increased until 12-15 years of age, and thereafter increased at a slower rate to a plateau at about the 4th decade of life. For both (c) the present in vivo and (d) the published MR imaging and postmortem data, the GW-WM ratio drops sharply from infancy to about the end of adolescence after which it declines at a slower rate. Symbols in d represent data from the postmortem studies of Anton (49) (), Jaeger (50) ({lozenge}), and Miller et al (25) (*) and the MR imaging studies of Filipek et al (51) ({blacksquare} = data in males, {square} = data in females), Pfefferbaum et al (27) ({triangledown}), and Narayana and Borthakur (52) ({boxtimes}).

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3c. Graphs depict growth and aging changes in (a) GM and (b) WM volumes in 116 living healthy volunteers. Volume intercepts at birth are based on the findings of Huppi et al (55). (On x axes, age scales change after 20-year point.) GM volume reached a maximum by 6-9 years of age and thereafter declined linearly. WM volume rapidly increased until 12-15 years of age, and thereafter increased at a slower rate to a plateau at about the 4th decade of life. For both (c) the present in vivo and (d) the published MR imaging and postmortem data, the GW-WM ratio drops sharply from infancy to about the end of adolescence after which it declines at a slower rate. Symbols in d represent data from the postmortem studies of Anton (49) (), Jaeger (50) ({lozenge}), and Miller et al (25) (*) and the MR imaging studies of Filipek et al (51) ({blacksquare} = data in males, {square} = data in females), Pfefferbaum et al (27) ({triangledown}), and Narayana and Borthakur (52) ({boxtimes}).

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3d. Graphs depict growth and aging changes in (a) GM and (b) WM volumes in 116 living healthy volunteers. Volume intercepts at birth are based on the findings of Huppi et al (55). (On x axes, age scales change after 20-year point.) GM volume reached a maximum by 6-9 years of age and thereafter declined linearly. WM volume rapidly increased until 12-15 years of age, and thereafter increased at a slower rate to a plateau at about the 4th decade of life. For both (c) the present in vivo and (d) the published MR imaging and postmortem data, the GW-WM ratio drops sharply from infancy to about the end of adolescence after which it declines at a slower rate. Symbols in d represent data from the postmortem studies of Anton (49) (), Jaeger (50) ({lozenge}), and Miller et al (25) (*) and the MR imaging studies of Filipek et al (51) ({blacksquare} = data in males, {square} = data in females), Pfefferbaum et al (27) ({triangledown}), and Narayana and Borthakur (52) ({boxtimes}).

 
WM Volume
Age-related change in WM volume is shown in Figure 3b. WM volume increased 74% from early childhood (19–33 months) to adolescence (12–15 years) (linear component, R = 0.81, R2 = 0.65, t58 = 10.28, P < .001; quadratic component, R = 0.82, R2 = 0.68, t57 = 2.59, P < .01). Thereafter, it increased at a slower rate and reached a plateau by the 4th decade of life; relative to this maximum level, it decreased by 13% in the oldest volunteers (aged 70–80 years) (significant quadratic component only, R = 0.39, R2 = 0.15, t53 = 2.61, P < .01) (Fig 3b). The percentage of WM contributing to intracranial space volume was not different in male and female volunteers (female volunteers, 28.7% ± 0.04%; male volunteers, 28.9% ± 0.03%).

GM-WM Ratio
As shown in Figure 3c, the GM-WM ratio decreased rapidly from early childhood (19–33 months) to later adulthood (about 50–60 years). Thereafter, it slowly but steadily declined (linear component, R = 0.69, R2 = 0.47, t114 = 10.10, P < .001; quadratic component, change in R2 = 0.24, t113 = 9.63, P < .001). GM-WM ratios were not different in male and female volunteers (female volunteers, 2.11 ± 0.6; male volunteers, 2.12 ± 0.5).

The present MR imaging–based age-related decline in the GM-WM ratio is generally consistent with postmortem study–derived age-related differences in this ratio, as originally reported nearly a century ago (49,50), and with the more contemporary postmortem data (25) and recent MR imaging–derived values (Fig 3d) (27,51,52).

Total Intracranial CSF Volume
Total ventricular and extracerebral CSF volume increased during the life span (Fig 4a). The total volume of CSF (ventricular and subarachnoid) more than doubled between early childhood (19–33 months) (approximately 96 mL) and middle adulthood (40–55 years) (approximately 250 mL). This total CSF volume increased linearly with age in the entire sample of both male and female volunteers (male volunteers, R = 0.84, R2 = 0.71, t77 = 13.84, P < .001; female volunteers, R = 0.88, R2 = 0.78, t35 = 11.19, P < .001).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. (a) Graph shows that total intracranial CSF volume increased resolutely across the life span included in the present study. (b) Nonetheless, graph shows that the percentage of CSF occupying intracranial remained at about 7%-9% during the period of rapid intracranial space and whole brain growth (Fig 1a, 1b) from early childhood to early adolescence. Thereafter, the percentage increased as whole brain volume declined, and intracranial space volume changed little. (On x axis, age scales change after 20-year point.)

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. (a) Graph shows that total intracranial CSF volume increased resolutely across the life span included in the present study. (b) Nonetheless, graph shows that the percentage of CSF occupying intracranial remained at about 7%-9% during the period of rapid intracranial space and whole brain growth (Fig 1a, 1b) from early childhood to early adolescence. Thereafter, the percentage increased as whole brain volume declined, and intracranial space volume changed little. (On x axis, age scales change after 20-year point.)

 
On the other hand, as a percentage of intracranial space volume (Fig 4b), total CSF remained steady at 7–9% during the period of rapid intracranial space growth and whole brain growth from early childhood to adolescence and then increased after the 2nd decade of life (R = 0.81, R2 = 0.65, t54 = 10.03, P < .001). In the oldest volunteers (aged 71–80 years), CSF ranged from 20%–33% of the intracranial volume. The percentage of CSF contributing to intracranial space volume was not different in male and female volunteers across the sample (female volunteers, 12.8% ± 0.01%; male volunteers, 11.2 % ± 0.06%) (Fig 4b).

Correlation Between Manual and Automatic Classification Methods
Statistical analyses were used to confirm that our automated method of measurement provided classifications with high fidelity to the results of the manual tracings performed on intermediate- and T2-weighted images of eight randomly selected volunteers. Correlations between manual and automatic classification of three different section locations within the right hemibrain in these eight brains were 0.982 for GM, 0.961 for WM, and 0.887 for CSF (Fig 1e).

Visual examination conducted by overlaying the results of the manual tracings on the images of the eight brains onto the automatically classified images (eg, Fig 1d) showed that correspondence between the automated and manual approaches was best and equally good in the cerebrum and cerebellum and was worst in the globus pallidus, lateral thalamus, substantia nigra, and red nucleus.

We also studied the correlation between the manual tracings and the automatic classification of the cortical GM (alone) on 20 intermediate- and T2-weighted images from the ninth randomly selected brain. Measures from those manual tracings and from the automated classification correlated to a level of more than 99%.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Intracranial Volume and Brain Size
Our study of parameters of normal brain development and aging with MR images of 116 healthy volunteers shows that the brain reaches maximum volume in early adolescence then steadily and linearly declines from early through middle adulthood, with an accelerated rate of decline after 55 years of age. Intracranial volume increases with brain volume but does not, thereafter, decline with aging. Between early childhood and early adolescence, we found that the healthy brain (Fig 2b) and intracranial space (Fig 2a) grew exponentially by about 25%–27%; however, by 71–80 years of age, brain volume was less than that of our 2- or 3-year-old children. These brain growth and aging effects were similar in male and female volunteers (with a hint of a sharper decline in brain volume in the oldest male volunteers [Fig 2]).

This pattern of life-span change is consistent with findings of previous studies of either development or aging.

Studies of development.—Postmortem study findings concur that the brain of neonates weighs 370 g on average and that its weight increases nearly threefold by 2 years of age (19,42,4446). The postmortem data (42) show that, from infancy to adolescence, brain weight increases by 29%, an amount similar to the 25% increase in brain volume noted in our study (Fig 2d). In postmortem studies (19,46) that focused on the life span from birth to adolescence or young adulthood, brain weight increased by about 32% from early childhood to adolescence. As with brain growth (Fig 2d), growth of intracranial volume is also similar between postmortem studies and our in vivo study (Figs 2c).

To our knowledge, no previous in vivo MR imaging study has quantified growth in whole brain and intracranial volumes in healthy young children; only groups of clinically-referred pediatric patients who are termed "neurologically normal" or "radiologically normal" have been studied. For example, in one group of such patients, there was "a rapid increase by 2 years of age, and thereafter a gradual increase until about 12 years" (10). Their growth curves show that, from early childhood to adolescence, cerebral volumes grew exponentially by about 22%, which is a magnitude of change comparable with that of the whole brain volume (ie, 25%) in the present study. In another study (27), pediatric patients had roughly a 30% increase in intracranial volume from infancy and early childhood to about 10 years of age, when maximum volumes were reached. In rare studies (53,54), cerebral volumes were measured in healthy children and adolescents. Neither study reported statistically significant age-related changes in cerebral volume, possibly because few young volunteers were included.

Studies of aging.—A large number of study findings agree that brain size decreases with advancing age (22), but the magnitude of decrease differs substantially between postmortem brain weight data on the one hand and in vivo whole brain volumes on the other (Fig 2d). According to findings of postmortem studies, brain weight decreases by only about 9% in males and females alike from a maximum in adolescence to late adulthood (71–80 years) (19,4143,48).

When we converted our brain and CSF volumes to brain weight (autopsy brain weight in grams = brain volume in milliliter x 1.0365 g/mL + CSF volume in milliliter x 1.00 g/mL), our results showed a similar small decrease (9%) in weight from adolescence to late adulthood (71–80 years; compare open and black symbols in Fig 2d). However, this is a far smaller decrease than the 26% decrease found in brain (GM and WM) volumes in our study (compare open and red symbols in Fig 2d). The discrepancy between age-related changes based on brain weight determined at autopsy and those based on in vivo brain volume is likely caused by the inclusion of the weight of CSF trapped in the ventricles and leptomeninges at autopsy as brain weight. In healthy older individuals, CSF volume and its weight can be considerable. As noted previously for the present study, CSF accounts for a small percentage (7%–12%) of the total intracranial volume in a healthy young person (and, therefore, would account for a small percent of brain weight in a standard measurement at autopsy); however, in 71–80-year-old adults, CSF in the ventricles and leptomeninges can account for 16%–25% of the intracranial volume (present study) (22,24,26,28).

Whole Brain GM Volume
In vivo MR imaging data show that cerebral GM volume increases linearly from 29 to 41 weeks after conception (55), continues to increase to 4–6 years of age (27), and decreases thereafter (27). Our in vivo study revealed a similar age-dependent profile for whole brain GM (compare our Fig 3a to figure 3a in the article by Pfefferbaum et al [27]). GM volume increased 13% from early childhood (mean age, 26 months) to later childhood (6–9 years), when maximum volume was reached (which is several years before peak whole brain volume is reached). From late childhood, GM decreased linearly by about 5% per decade throughout life. One recent study (13) revealed that most sampled regions showed linear age-related decreases in cerebral GM from 20 to 80 years; prefrontal and superior parietal cortex, respectively, decreased by 4.9% and 4.3% per decade, but some cortical areas, such as the anterior cingulate and primary motor cortex, decreased little.

The particular biologic mechanisms underlying this striking age-dependent profile of GM volume increase and decrease are not known with certainty. There are no comparable age-related increases and decreases in the number of neurons in the healthy brain that can account for these changes in GM volume. However, for the period from 29 weeks after conception through 6–9 years of age (during which the combined in vivo MR imaging data from our study and others [27,55] demonstrate increasing GM volume), prior postmortem studies report corresponding increases in the size of neuronal cells (19), increases in the extent of neuronal arbors (56), and increases in the number of synapses (57) and neurons (58).

The rapid growth of GM (including each of its neuronal components and the enhanced functional responses that characterize the period from 19 months to 9 years of age) is followed by a period of elimination of cerebral synapses (57) slowed the growth in cell and arbor size slows (19,56) and decreases in cerebral metabolic and neurophysiologic indices (5961). While these changes might be related to the onset of the decline in GM volume (which follows the achievement of peak volumes at about 6–9 years of age and which might also continue to contribute to the decline in late childhood and adolescence), they are largely completed by adolescence, and, therefore, they cannot explain the continued linear decline throughout early, middle, and late adulthood. Conversely, the various hypotheses that have been advanced to explain why GM declines during aging (eg, age-related atrophy in subcortical monoaminergic structures that supply cortical neurons and decline in the ability to renew synapses and repair of neurons) cannot explain the GM decline from late childhood through adolescence. It seems unlikely, therefore, that a single factor can account for the decline in GM that lasts nearly throughout the life-span; perhaps at different ages different factors operate to cause GM volume changes.

Whole Brain WM Volume
Prior in vivo MR imaging data show a sudden increase in whole-brain myelinated WM between 29 and 41 weeks after conception (55). From infancy through early adulthood, in vivo studies of cerebral WM reveal large increases in volume (10,27), as do studies of older children and adolescents (54). In our study, whole brain WM volume increased in a manner parallel to these developmental changes by about 74% from early childhood to adolescence; thereafter, it increased at a slower rate and finally reached a plateau by the 4th decade of life (Fig 3b).

We detected a decrease in WM volume of 13% in the oldest volunteers (aged 71–80 years). Others (13) found age-related volume decreases to be slight or not detectable in several cortical regions, and only prefrontal and superior parietal regions had statistically significant declines in volume with advancing age.

GM-WM Ratio
The opposing age-related patterns of volume change in GM and WM combine to make a striking curve of change in the GM-WM ratio throughout the life span (Fig 3c, 3d). In our study and in that of others (27), the steady rise in WM and decline in GM led to a sharply declining, curvilinear change in the GM-WM ratio from early childhood through adolescence. Apparently, beginning at about 20 years of age, the much slower rate of increase in WM combined with the steady decrease in GM substantially slowed the rate of decline in the GM-WM ratio in our study population. This life-span pattern of change is consistent with postmortem (49,50) and in vivo MR imaging data (27,51,52) that show that the GM-WM ratio in the very young brain is far larger than that of the adult brain and that, from 20 to 80 years of age, this ratio changes only slightly (25).

CSF Volumes
In our volunteer population, the absolute volume of ventricular and extracerebral CSF increased substantially and nearly linearly throughout the life span (from approximately 96 mL in toddlers to approximately 350 mL in 80-year-old adults) (Fig 4a). Therefore, increases in the absolute volume of intracranial CSF are a phenomenon of not only aging but the entire life span.

Nevertheless, the percentage of CSF that occupied intracranial space (Fig 4b) remained nearly constant at 7%–9% during the entire period of rapid intracranial and brain growth from early childhood to early adolescence. Thereafter, with little further change in intracranial space, but with decreasing brain volume with advancing age, the percentage of CSF that occupied intracranial space, as well as the absolute volume of CSF, increased from 14% during young and middle adulthood to 25% in our healthy older adults. It appears, therefore, that from adolescence through late adulthood, the percentage of CSF that occupies intracranial space gradually increases.

There are no developmental, postmortem, or in vivo MR imaging studies of changes in total intracranial CSF volumes. However, among a large number of in vivo studies of aging (22,26,27), there is uniform agreement that intracranial CSF increases with advancing age. For instance, a recent study (24) reported that CSF that occupied intracranial space increased from 12% to 17% between 26 and 70 years of age.

The absolute amounts of intracranial CSF reported in older adults varies somewhat from study to study (typically from 250 to 400 mL) most likely because different studies used different definitions of intracranial volume or CSF spaces. Our study included all brain, CSF, and intracranial space from the vertex to the level of the bottom of the medulla, and, so, we gave a "true" total intracranial CSF volume that was larger than, for instance, the volume calculated by others (22) who excluded CSF in the posterior fossa.

Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Study Designs
Cohort effects are unavoidable in any cross-sectional study of age-related changes during development and aging. Longitudinal studies are also vulnerable to cohort effects; for instance, longitudinal changes observed in a single cohort may not be representative of the population at large. Nonetheless, longitudinal MR imaging studies can have greater statistical power than that of cross-sectional studies in the detection of small effects, and the power of the longitudinal MR imaging design has been convincingly demonstrated in healthy individuals (62) and in those with different disorders (63,64).

However, the most powerful design for studying development and aging changes and for ruling out potential cohort effects is the cross-sequential design that combines cross-sectional and longitudinal procedures. (An example of such a longitudinal MR imaging study of children and adolescents if that of Giedd et al [65], which was published while the present article was in press.) Quantitative MR imaging is ideally suited for this, and the present article represents the cross-sectional phase of our cross-sequential design; our group has nearly completed data collection in a long-term, longitudinal MR imaging phase; results from this combined, cross-sequential, quantitative MR imaging study will be reported in the future.

Clinical and Research Utility of Quantitative MR imaging
Our quantitative MR imaging procedures yielded indices of normal brain development and aging throughout the life span that faithfully followed the age-related time courses predicted from quantitative postmortem procedures. Our in vivo normative life-span MR imaging data may be useful in clinical settings and in research studies for detecting and monitoring pathologic alterations in fundamental neuroanatomic indices in patients with suspected congenital, developmental, or acquired disorders. For example, using the normative values and quantitative MR imaging procedures in the present study, we detected macrencephaly in young children suspected of being autistic (Courchesne E, unpublished data, 1991–1996). In spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (66), a statistically significant correlation exists between supratentorial atrophy and disease duration (whereas the degree of infratentorial atrophy does not correlate with disease duration). The combination of normative age-related changes with results from serial quantitative MR imaging of intracranial compartments in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 may help in the detection of the progressive steps of this disease. Moreover, individual research studies of a number of disorders have shown that volumetric MR imaging analyses of basic brain parameters can be used to distinguish disorders from normal states and to distinguish diseases from each other (67,68), but the routine clinical use of such information via quantitative MR imaging assays has remained limited.

Our study adds evidence indicating that quantitative MR imaging assays of several fundamental neuroanatomic indices in a routine clinical setting is feasible. Until recently, quantitative MR imaging examinations of the neuroanatomy were not a practical option in routine clinical neuroradiologic examinations primarily because they were (a) dependent on specialized imaging protocols, (b) labor intensive, (c) dependent on a high level of detailed anatomic knowledge and manual tracing, (d) dependent on specialized computer hardware, or (e) based on homegrown software that required specialized computer or biomedical knowledge to operate.

Our study, along with a number of other recent studies (26,28,36), involved the use of routine intermediate- and T2-weighted imaging protocols and semiautomated approaches that circumvent these obstacles. For instance, in our study, classification of GM, WM, and CSF pixels was accomplished by using a fully automated algorithm that (a) was based on known and tested principles (28,35,36); (b) was validated against neuroanatomic tracings performed by an experienced neuroanatomist on images in young children, adolescents, and adults; (c) provided results with measurement errors of only 1%–2% or less; and (d) clinical MR imaging technologists could easily operate.

Moreover, this algorithm can be used on computers that are commonly available at clinical imaging facilities. The primary drawback with our algorithm is a single semiautomated "skull removal" step that involves manual tracing and that requires about 45 minutes to complete. However, adaptation of this step to meet time and personnel needs in a clinical setting is practical, and is, in fact, fast (approximately 5 minutes), although easy-to-use, less precise methods that implement that single step are already commercially available. With current procedures, therefore, reliable and accurate normative brain indices, such as those of the present report, can be used in any clinical facility as quantitative clinical standards against which possible congenital, acquired, or treatment-related deviations from normal development across the life span can be judged.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work is supported by funds from NINDS (5P50-NS-22343) and NIDCD (5P50-DC-021289) awarded to Elizabeth Bates. Funds from her grants paid for recruitment and imaging in a subsection of the control subjects whose data are reported in the article. The authors thank Lynn K. Lord, MA, and Beth M. Hanenburg, AF, for MR imaging technical assistance, Rachel Yeung Courchesne, BS, for project coordination and helpful comments on the manuscript, and Christina M. Karns, BS, for technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: CSF = cerebrospinal fluid, GM = gray matter, IQ = intelligence quotient, WM = white matter

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, E.C.; study concepts, E.C., G.A.P.; study design, E.C.; definition of intellectual content, E.C.; literature research, E.C., H.J.C.; clinical studies, B.E., S.H.; data acquisition, J.T., J.C., E.C., A.C.; data analysis, H.J.C., A.C., B.E.; statistical analysis, J.T., M.H.; manuscript preparation, E.C., H.J.C., G.A.P., J.T.; manuscript editing, E.C., G.A.P., H.J.C.; manuscript review, E.C., G.A.P.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Andreasen NC, Flashman L, Flaum M, et al. Regional brain abnormalities in schizophrenia measured with magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 1994; 272:1723-1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Baumgardner TL, Singer HS, Denckla MB, et al. Corpus callosum morphology in children with Tourette syndrome and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurology 1996; 47:477-482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Berquin PC, Giedd JN, Jacobsen LK, et al. Cerebellum in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a morphometric MRI study. Neurology 1998; 50:1087-1093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Courchesne E, Yeung-Courchesne R, Press GA, Hesselink JR, Jernigan TL. Hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules VI and VII in autism. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:1349-1354.[Abstract]
  5. Courchesne E, Saitoh O, Yeung-Courchesne R, et al. Abnormality of cerebellar vermian lobules VI and VII in patients with infantile autism: identification of hypoplastic and hyperplastic subgroups with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:123-130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Egaas B, Courchesne E, Saitoh O. Reduced size of corpus callosum in autism. Arch Neurol 1995; 52:794-801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gosain AK, McCarthy JG, Glatt P, Staffenberg D, Hoffmann RG. A study of intracranial volume in Apert syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95:284-295.[Medline]
  8. Hashimoto T, Tayama M, Murakawa K, et al. Development of the brainstem and cerebellum in autistic patients. J Autism Dev Disord 1995; 25:1—18.
  9. Hynd GW, Semrud-Clikeman M, Lorys AR, Novey ES, Eliopulos D, Lyytinen H. Corpus callosum morphology in attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: morphometric analysis of MRI. J Learn Disabil 1991; 24:141-146.
  10. Iwasaki N, Hamano K, Okada Y, et al. Volumetric quantification of brain development using MRI. Neuroradiology 1997; 39:841-846.[Medline]
  11. Jacobsen LK, Giedd JN, Berquin PC, et al. Quantitative morphology of the cerebellum and fourth ventricle in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:1663-1669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Raz N, Torres IJ, Briggs SD, et al. Selective neuroanatomic abnormalities in Down’s syndrome and their cognitive correlates: evidence from MRI morphology. Neurology 1995; 45:356-366.[Abstract]
  13. Raz N, Gunning FM, Head D, et al. Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: differential vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter. Cereb Cortex 1997; 7:268-282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Reiss AL, Faruque F, Naidu S, et al. Neuroanatomy of Rett syndrome: a volumetric imaging study. Ann Neurol 1993; 34:227-234.[Medline]
  15. Rumsey J. Thatcher RW, Lyon GR, Rumsey J, Krasnegor N, eds Developmental neuroimaging: mapping the development of brain and behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1997.
  16. Rumsey J. Ernst M, Rumsey JM, eds Functional neuroimaging in child psychiatry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  17. Schlaepfer TE, Harris GJ, Tien AY, et al. Decreased regional cortical gray matter volume in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:842-848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Toft PB, Leth H, Ring PB, Peitersen B, Lou HC, Henriksen O. Volumetric analysis of the normal infant brain and in intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1995; 43:15-29.[Medline]
  19. Blinkov SM, Glezer II. The human brain in figures and tables: a quantitative handbook New York, NY: Plenum Press and Basic Books, 1968; 334-338.
  20. Lichtenberg R. Radiographie du crane de 226 enfants normaux de la naissance a 8 ans: impressions digitiformes, capacite, angles et indicies Paris, France: University of Paris, 1960.
  21. Dekaban AS. Tables of cranial and orbital measurements, cranial volume, and derived indexes in males and females from 7 days to 20 years of age. Ann Neurol 1977; 2:485-491.[Medline]
  22. Coffey CE, Lucke JF, Saxton JA, et al. Sex differences in brain aging: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Neurol 1998; 55:169-179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Jernigan TL, Trauner DA, Hesselink JR, Tallal PA. Maturation of human cerebrum observed in vivo during adolescence. Brain 1991; 114:2037-2049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Murphy DG, DeCarli C, McIntosh AR, et al. Sex differences in human brain morphometry and metabolism: an in vivo quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography study on the effect of aging. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:585-594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Miller AK, Alston RL, Corsellis JA. Variation with age in the volumes of grey and white matter in the cerebral hemispheres of man: measurements with an image analyser. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1980; 6:119-132.[Medline]
  26. Mueller EA, Moore MM, Kerr DCR, et al. Brain volume preserved in healthy elderly through the eleventh decade. Neurology 1998; 51:1555-1562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Pfefferbaum A, Mathalon DH, Sullivan EV, Rawles JM, Zipursky RB, Lim KO. A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood. Arch Neurol 1994; 51:874-887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Matsumae M, Kikinis R, Maorocz IA, et al. Age-related changes in intracranial compartment volumes in normal adults assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1996; 84:982-991.[Medline]
  29. Thorndike RL, Hagen EP, Sattler JM. The Stanford-Binet intelligence scale 4th ed. Chicago, Ill: Riverside, 1986.
  30. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Corporation, 1991.
  31. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Corporation, 1974.
  32. Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Corporation, 1997.
  33. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Corporation, 1981.
  34. Delis D, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test: adult version San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Corporation, 1987.
  35. Vannier MW, Butterfield RL, Jordan D, Murphy WA, Levitt RG, Gado M. Multispectral analysis of magnetic resonance images. Radiology 1985; 154:221-224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Jackson EF, Narayana PA, Falconer JC. Reproducibility of nonparametric feature map segmentation for determination of normal human intracranial volumes with MR imaging data. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4:692-700.[Medline]
  37. Frontera JG. Evaluation of the immediate effects of some fixatives upon the measurements of the brains of macaques. J Comp Neurol 1958; 109:417-438.
  38. Stephan H. Methodische studien uber den quantitativen vergleich architektonischer struktureinheiten des gehirns. Z Wiss Zool 1960; 164:1-2.
  39. Dixon WJ, Brown MB, Engelman L, Jennrich R. BMDP statistical software manual Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1990.
  40. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.
  41. Chrzanowska G, Beben A. Weight of the brain and body height in man between the ages of 20 and 89 years. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 1973; 32:391-406.[Medline]
  42. Dekaban AS, Sadowsky D. Changes in brain weights during the span of human life: relation of brain weights to body heights and body weights. Ann Neurol 1978; 4:345-356.[Medline]
  43. Pakkenberg H, Voight J. Brain weight of the Danes. Acta Anat (Basel) 1964; 56:297-307.
  44. Craig CF. Laboratory methods of the U.S. Army Philadelphia, Pa: Lea and Febiger, 1929.
  45. Feer E. Textbook of pediatrics Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 1922.
  46. Coppoletta JM, Wolbach SB. Body length and organ weights of infants and children: a study of the body length and normal weights of the more important vital organs of the body between birth and twelve years of age. Am J Pathol 1933; 9:55-70.
  47. Dam AM. The density of neurons in the human hippocampus. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1979; 5:249-264.[Medline]
  48. Ho K, Roessman U, Straumfjord JV, Monroe G. Analysis of brain weight. I. Adult brain weight in relation to sex, race and age. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1980; 104:635-639.[Medline]
  49. Anton G. Gehirnvermessung mittelst des Kompensations-Polar-Planimeters. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1903; 16:1263-1267.
  50. Jaeger R. Inhaltsberechnungen der Rinden-und Mark-substanz des Grosshirns durch planimetrische Messungen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 1914; 54:261-272.
  51. Filipek PA, Richelme C, Kennedy DN, Caviness VS, Jr. The young adult human brain: an MRI-based morphometric analysis. Cereb Cortex 1994; 4:344-360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Narayana PA, Borthakur A. Effect of radio frequency inhomogeneity correction on the reproducibility of intra-cranial volumes using MR image data. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:396-400.[Medline]
  53. Giedd JN, Snell JW, Lange N, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain development: ages 4–18. Cereb Cortex 1996; 6:551-560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Reiss AL, Abrams MT, Singer HS, Ross JL, Denckla MB. Brain development, gender and IQ in children: a volumetric imaging study. Brain 1996; 119:1763-1774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Huppi PS, Warfield S, Kikinis R, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain development in premature and mature newborns. Ann Neurol 1998; 43:224-235.[Medline]
  56. Schade JP, van Groenigen WB. Structural organization of the human cerebral cortex. I. Maturation of the middle frontal gyrus. Acta Anat 1961; 47:72-111.
  57. Huttenlocher PR, Dabholkar AS. Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol 1997; 387:167-178.[Medline]
  58. Shankle WR, Romney AK, Landing BH, Hara J. Developmental patterns in the cytoarchitecture of the human cerebral cortex from birth to 6 years examined by correspondence analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:4023-4028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Chugani HT, Phelps ME, Mazziotta JC. Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development. Ann Neurol 1987; 22:487-497.[Medline]
  60. Courchesne E. Event-related brain potentials: comparison between children and adults. Science 1977; 197:589-592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Courchesne E. Chronology of postnatal human brain development: event-related potential, positron emission tomography, myelino-genesis, and synaptogenesis studies. In: Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson R, eds. Event-related brain potentials: basic issues and applications. New York, NY: Oxford Press, 1990; 210-241.
  62. Pujol J, Vendrell P, Junquae C, Martai-Vilalta JL, Capdevila A. When does human brain development end? evidence of corpus callosum growth up to adulthood. Ann Neurol 1993; 34:71-75.[Medline]
  63. de Leon MJ, Convit A, DeSanti S, et al. Contribution of structural neuroimaging to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr 1997; 9(suppl 1):183-190.
  64. Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Mathalon PK, Shear PK, Rosenbloom MJ, Lim KO. Longitudinal changes in magnetic resonance imaging brain volumes in abstinent and relapsed alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1995; 19:1177-1191.[Medline]
  65. Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, et al. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neurosci 1999; 2:861-863.[Medline]
  66. Giuffrida S, Saponara R, Restivo DA, et al. Supratentorial atrophy in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: MRI study of 20 patients. J Neurol 1999; 246:383-388.[Medline]
  67. Milhorat TH, Chou MW, Trinidad EM, et al. Chiarai 1 malformation redefined: clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients. Neurosurgery 1999; 44:1005-1017.[Medline]
  68. Matsumae M, Kikinis R, Morocz I, et al. Intracranial compartment volumes in patients with enlarged ventricles assessed by magnetic resonance-based image processing. J Neurosurg 1996; 84:972-981.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
S. H. Mostofsky, S. K. Powell, D. J. Simmonds, M. C. Goldberg, B. Caffo, and J. J. Pekar
Decreased connectivity and cerebellar activity in autism during motor task performance
Brain, April 23, 2009; (2009) awp088v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. M. Fjell, L. T. Westlye, I. Amlien, T. Espeseth, I. Reinvang, N. Raz, I. Agartz, D. H. Salat, D. N. Greve, B. Fischl, et al.
High Consistency of Regional Cortical Thinning in Aging across Multiple Samples
Cereb Cortex, January 15, 2009; (2009) bhn232v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
A. M. Brickman, N. Schupf, J. J. Manly, J. A. Luchsinger, H. Andrews, M. X. Tang, C. Reitz, S. A. Small, R. Mayeux, C. DeCarli, et al.
Brain Morphology in Older African Americans, Caribbean Hispanics, and Whites From Northern Manhattan
Arch Neurol, August 1, 2008; 65(8): 1053 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
E. Jouvent, J.-F. Mangin, R. Porcher, A. Viswanathan, M. O'Sullivan, J.-P. Guichard, M. Dichgans, M.-G. Bousser, and H. Chabriat
Cortical changes in cerebral small vessel diseases: a 3D MRI study of cortical morphology in CADASIL
Brain, August 1, 2008; 131(8): 2201 - 2208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
D Horakova, J L Cox, E Havrdova, S Hussein, O Dolezal, D Cookfair, M G Dwyer, Z Seidl, N Bergsland, M Vaneckova, et al.
Evolution of different MRI measures in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis over 2 and 5 years: a case-control study
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2008; 79(4): 407 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. E. Hugenschmidt, A. M. Peiffer, R. A. Kraft, R. Casanova, A. R. Deibler, J. H. Burdette, J. A. Maldjian, and P. J. Laurienti
Relating Imaging Indices of White Matter Integrity and Volume in Healthy Older Adults
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 433 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Pieperhoff, L. Homke, F. Schneider, U. Habel, N. J. Shah, K. Zilles, and K. Amunts
Deformation Field Morphometry Reveals Age-Related Structural Differences between the Brains of Adults up to 51 Years
J. Neurosci., January 23, 2008; 28(4): 828 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
T. J. Eluvathingal, K. M. Hasan, L. Kramer, J. M. Fletcher, and L. Ewing-Cobbs
Quantitative Diffusion Tensor Tractography of Association and Projection Fibers in Normally Developing Children and Adolescents
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2007; 17(12): 2760 - 2768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E V SULLIVAN and A PFEFFERBAUM
Neuroradiological characterization of normal adult ageing
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(Special_Issue_2): S99 - S108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. R. Sowell, B. S. Peterson, E. Kan, R. P. Woods, J. Yoshii, R. Bansal, D. Xu, H. Zhu, P. M. Thompson, and A. W. Toga
Sex Differences in Cortical Thickness Mapped in 176 Healthy Individuals between 7 and 87 Years of Age
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1550 - 1560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
K. D. Mraz, J. Green, T. Dumont-Mathieu, S. Makin, and D. Fein
Correlates of Head Circumference Growth in Infants Later Diagnosed With Autism Spectrum Disorders
J Child Neurol, June 1, 2007; 22(6): 700 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. H. Gilmore, W. Lin, M. W. Prastawa, C. B. Looney, Y. S. K. Vetsa, R. C. Knickmeyer, D. D. Evans, J. K. Smith, R. M. Hamer, J. A. Lieberman, et al.
Regional Gray Matter Growth, Sexual Dimorphism, and Cerebral Asymmetry in the Neonatal Brain
J. Neurosci., February 7, 2007; 27(6): 1255 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S Lippe, M-S Roy, C Perchet, and M Lassonde
Electrophysiological Markers of Visuocortical Development
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 100 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. E. Rettmann, M. A. Kraut, J. L. Prince, and S. M. Resnick
Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Analyses of Anatomical Sulcal Changes Associated with Aging
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2006; 16(11): 1584 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. H. Woodward, D. G. Kaloupek, C. C. Streeter, M. O. Kimble, A. L. Reiss, S. Eliez, L. L. Wald, P. F. Renshaw, B. B. Frederick, B. Lane, et al.
Hippocampal Volume, PTSD, and Alcoholism in Combat Veterans
Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 2006; 163(4): 674 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
N. Raz, U. Lindenberger, K. M. Rodrigue, K. M. Kennedy, D. Head, A. Williamson, C. Dahle, D. Gerstorf, and J. D. Acker
Regional Brain Changes in Aging Healthy Adults: General Trends, Individual Differences and Modifiers
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2005; 15(11): 1676 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. L. Narr, R. M. Bilder, A. W. Toga, R. P. Woods, D. E. Rex, P. R. Szeszko, D. Robinson, S. Sevy, H. Gunduz-Bruce, Y.-P. Wang, et al.
Mapping Cortical Thickness and Gray Matter Concentration in First Episode Schizophrenia
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2005; 15(6): 708 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. F. Fotenos, A. Z. Snyder, L. E. Girton, J. C. Morris, and R. L. Buckner
Normative estimates of cross-sectional and longitudinal brain volume decline in aging and AD
Neurology, March 22, 2005; 64(6): 1032 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. W. Bondi, W. S. Houston, L. T. Eyler, and G. G. Brown
fMRI evidence of compensatory mechanisms in older adults at genetic risk for Alzheimer disease
Neurology, February 8, 2005; 64(3): 501 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. Zhang, K. M. Thomas, M. C. Davidson, B. J. Casey, L. A. Heier, and A. M. Ulug
MR Quantitation of Volume and Diffusion Changes in the Developing Brain
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 45 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. J. M. C. Palmen, H. van Engeland, P. R. Hof, and C. Schmitz
Neuropathological findings in autism
Brain, December 1, 2004; 127(12): 2572 - 2583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. B. Walhovd, A. M. Fjell, I. Reinvang, A. Lundervold, B. Fischl, B. T. Quinn, and A. M. Dale
Size does matter in the long run: Hippocampal and cortical volume predict recall across weeks
Neurology, October 12, 2004; 63(7): 1193 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. R. Sowell, P. M. Thompson, C. M. Leonard, S. E. Welcome, E. Kan, and A. W. Toga
Longitudinal Mapping of Cortical Thickness and Brain Growth in Normal Children
J. Neurosci., September 22, 2004; 24(38): 8223 - 8231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. J. Tisserand, M. P.J. van Boxtel, J. C. Pruessner, P. Hofman, A. C. Evans, and J. Jolles
A Voxel-based Morphometric Study to Determine Individual Differences in Gray Matter Density Associated with Age and Cognitive Change Over Time
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2004; 14(9): 966 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
E. R. Sowell, P. M. Thompson, and A. W. Toga
Mapping Changes in the Human Cortex throughout the Span of Life
Neuroscientist, August 1, 2004; 10(4): 372 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. M. Lyons, C. Yang, S. Eliez, A. L. Reiss, and A. F. Schatzberg
Cognitive Correlates of White Matter Growth and Stress Hormones in Female Squirrel Monkey Adults
J. Neurosci., April 7, 2004; 24(14): 3655 - 3662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. A. Frank, N. Richert, C. Bash, L. Stone, P. A. Calabresi, B. Lewis, R. Stone, T. Howard, and H. F. McFarland
Interferon-{beta}-1b slows progression of atrophy in RRMS: Three-year follow-up in NAb- and NAb+ patients
Neurology, March 9, 2004; 62(5): 719 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. M. Bjork, B. Knutson, G. W. Fong, D. M. Caggiano, S. M. Bennett, and D. W. Hommer
Incentive-Elicited Brain Activation in Adolescents: Similarities and Differences from Young Adults
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2004; 24(8): 1793 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. L. Moritz and J. C. Ayus
The pathophysiology and treatment of hyponatraemic encephalopathy: an update
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2486 - 2491.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
K. L. Narr, T. Sharma, R. P. Woods, P. M. Thompson, E. R. Sowell, D. Rex, S. Kim, D. Asuncion, S. Jang, J. Mazziotta, et al.
Increases in Regional Subarachnoid CSF Without Apparent Cortical Gray Matter Deficits in Schizophrenia: Modulating Effects of Sex and Age
Am J Psychiatry, December 1, 2003; 160(12): 2169 - 2180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. M. Bjork, S. J. Grant, and D. W. Hommer
Cross-Sectional Volumetric Analysis of Brain Atrophy in Alcohol Dependence: Effects of Drinking History and Comorbid Substance Use Disorder
Am J Psychiatry, November 1, 2003; 160(11): 2038 - 2045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. L. COLLINSON, C. E. MACKAY, A. C. JAMES, D. J. QUESTED, T. PHILLIPS, N. ROBERTS, and T. J. CROW
Brain volume, asymmetry and intellectual impairment in relation to sex in early-onset schizophrenia
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2003; 183(2): 114 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. Courchesne, R. Carper, and N. Akshoomoff
Evidence of Brain Overgrowth in the First Year of Life in Autism
JAMA, July 16, 2003; 290(3): 337 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. Resnick, D. L. Pham, M. A. Kraut, A. B. Zonderman, and C. Davatzikos
Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies of Older Adults: A Shrinking Brain
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 3295 - 3301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
W. Cahn, H. E. H. Pol, E. B. T. E. Lems, N. E. M. van Haren, H. G. Schnack, J. A. van der Linden, P. F. Schothorst, H. van Engeland, and R. S. Kahn
Brain Volume Changes in First-Episode Schizophrenia: A 1-Year Follow-up Study
Arch Gen Psychiatry, November 1, 2002; 59(11): 1002 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R Leigh, J Ostuni, D Pham, A Goldszal, B K Lewis, T Howard, N Richert, H McFarland, and J A Frank
Estimating cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis patients from various MR pulse sequences
Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2002; 8(5): 420 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Ge, R. I. Grossman, J. S. Babb, M. L. Rabin, L. J. Mannon, and D. L. Kolson
Age-Related Total Gray Matter and White Matter Changes in Normal Adult Brain. Part I: Volumetric MR Imaging Analysis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2002; 23(8): 1327 - 1333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Ge, R. I. Grossman, J. S. Babb, M. L. Rabin, L. J. Mannon, and D. L. Kolson
Age-Related Total Gray Matter and White Matter Changes in Normal Adult Brain. Part II: Quantitative Magnetization Transfer Ratio Histogram Analysis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2002; 23(8): 1334 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. H. Miller, F. Barkhof, J. A. Frank, G. J. M. Parker, and A. J. Thompson
Measurement of atrophy in multiple sclerosis: pathological basis, methodological aspects and clinical relevance
Brain, August 1, 2002; 125(8): 1676 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
H. E. Hulshoff Pol, H. G. Schnack, M. G.B.C. Bertens, N. E.M. van Haren, I. van der Tweel, W. G. Staal, W. F.C. Baare, and R. S. Kahn
Volume Changes in Gray Matter in Patients With Schizophrenia
Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2002; 159(2): 244 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. R. Sowell, P. M. Thompson, D. Rex, D. Kornsand, K. D. Tessner, T. L. Jernigan, and A. W. Toga
Mapping Sulcal Pattern Asymmetry and Local Cortical Surface Gray Matter Distribution In Vivo: Maturation in Perisylvian Cortices
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2002; 12(1): 17 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
W. F.C. Baare, H. E. Hulshoff Pol, D. I. Boomsma, D. Posthuma, E. J.C. de Geus, H. G. Schnack, N. E.M. van Haren, C. J. van Oel, and R. S. Kahn
Quantitative Genetic Modeling of Variation in Human Brain Morphology
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2001; 11(9): 816 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
E. Courchesne, C. M. Karns, H. R. Davis, R. Ziccardi, R. A. Carper, Z. D. Tigue, H. J. Chisum, P. Moses, K. Pierce, C. Lord, et al.
Unusual brain growth patterns in early life in patients with autistic disorder: An MRI study
Neurology, July 24, 2001; 57(2): 245 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. Moses, E. Courchesne, J. Stiles, D. Trauner, B. Egaas, and E. Edwards
Regional Size Reduction in the Human Corpus Callosum Following Pre- and Perinatal Brain Injury
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2000; 10(12): 1200 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. J. Van Laere and R. A. Dierckx
Brain Perfusion SPECT: Age- and Sex-related Effects Correlated with Voxel-based Morphometric Findings in Healthy Adults
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 810 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. J. Schmithorst, M. Wilke, B. J. Dardzinski, and S. K. Holland
Correlation of White Matter Diffusivity and Anisotropy with Age during Childhood and Adolescence: A Cross-sectional Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging Study
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 212 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courchesne, E.
Right arrow Articles by Press, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Courchesne, E.
Right arrow Articles by Press, G. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE