Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majd, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rushton, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majd, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rushton, H. G.
(Radiology. 2001;218:101-108.)
© RSNA, 2001


Experimental Studies

Acute Pyelonephritis: Comparison of Diagnosis with 99mTc-DMSA SPECT, Spiral CT, MR Imaging, and Power Doppler US in an Experimental Pig Model1

Massoud Majd, MD, Anna R. Nussbaum Blask, MD, Bruce M. Markle, MD, Eglal Shalaby-Rana, MD, Hans G. Pohl, MD, Jae-Shin Park, MD, Roma Chandra, MD, Khodayar Rais-Bahrami, MD, Nayan Pandya, CNMT, Kantilal M. Patel, PhD and H. Gil Rushton, MD

1 From the Depts of Radiology (M.M., A.R.N.B., B.M.M., E.S.R., N.P.), Urology (H.G.P., J.S.P., H.G.R.), Pathology (R.C.), Neonatology (K.R.B.), and Research Institute (K.M.P.), Children’s National Medical Center and the George Washington Univ School of Medicine, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010. From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received Feb 1, 2000; revision requested Mar 30; final revision received Jul 24; accepted Jul 26. Supported in part by the Board of Lady Visitors and the Discovery Fund of Children’s National Medical Center, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Uroradiology. Address correspondence to M.M. (e-mail: mmajd@cnmc.org).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), spiral computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and power Doppler ultrasonography (US) for the detection and localization of acute pyelonephritis by using histopathologic findings as the standard of reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral vesicoureteric reflux was surgically created in 35 piglets (70 kidneys). One week later, a liquid bacterial culture of Escherichia coli was injected into the bladder. Three days after induction of urinary infection, imaging studies were performed, and the kidneys were removed for histopathologic examination. SPECT images were obtained 2–3 hours after injection of 99mTc-DMSA. Transverse and coronal MR images were obtained with gadolinium-enhanced fast inversion recovery. Transverse CT images were obtained before and after injection of contrast agent. Power Doppler US was performed in longitudinal, transverse, and coronal planes. Each kidney was divided into three zones for correlation of findings.

RESULTS: Histopathologic examination revealed pyelonephritis in 102 zones in 38 kidneys. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting pyelonephritis in the kidneys were 92.1% and 93.8% for SPECT, 89.5% and 87.5% for MR imaging, 86.8% and 87.5% for CT, and 74.3% and 56.7% for US. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting pyelonephritis in the zones were 94.1% and 95.4% for SPECT, 91.2% and 92.6% for MR imaging, 88.2% and 93.5% for CT, and 56.6% and 81.4% for US. The pairwise comparison of these modalities showed no statistically significant difference among them except for US.

CONCLUSION: 99mTc-DMSA SPECT, spiral CT, and MR imaging appear to be equally sensitive and reliable for the detection of acute pyelonephritis; power Doppler US is significantly less accurate.

Index terms: Animals • Kidney, CT, 81.12114, 81.12115 • Kidney, MR, 81.121411, 81.121412, 81.121413, 81.12143 • Kidney, SPECT, 81.12171 • Kidney, US, 81.12984 • Nephritis, 81.212 • Ultrasound (US), comparative studies


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Acute pyelonephritis, if not treated early and adequately, may result in irreversible renal scarring with sequelae of hypertension and chronic renal failure. Diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in infants and children on the basis of clinical and laboratory findings is often difficult and may require imaging studies (1). At the present time, four imaging techniques are used: renal cortical scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

Findings in previous experimental animal studies in which histopathology was used as the standard of reference have shown that both renal cortical scintigraphy with technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and MR imaging are highly sensitive and reliable for the detection of acute pyelonephritis (25). Nonspiral CT proved to be less reliable than 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy (6), but the accuracy of spiral CT remained unknown. In a clinical study (7), gray-scale US was unreliable compared with 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy. However, since experimental studies have shown that most pyelonephritic lesions are ischemic (811), it was anticipated that power Doppler US would greatly improve the sensitivity of US for the detection of acute pyelonephritis. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of four cross-sectional imaging techniques—99mTc-DMSA single photon emission CT (SPECT), spiral CT, MR imaging, and power Doppler US—for the detection and localization of acute pyelonephritis, directly and in the same experimental setting, by using strict histopathologic criteria as the standard of reference.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental Model
We used a well-established piglet model of experimentally induced acute pyelonephritis. The study was approved by our institutional animal use and care committee. Bilateral vesicoureteric reflux was surgically created in 35 Yorkshire piglets (17 female and 18 male piglets; age, 2–4 weeks; Archer Farms, Belcamp, Md) by incising the roof of the intramural ureter back to the ureterovesical junction. The piglets received antibiotic prophylaxis for 5 days postoperatively by using trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim; Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ) to maintain sterile urine during the healing period. Antibiotics were then discontinued, and 2 days later a urine sample was obtained by means of suprapubic aspiration for culture. Urinary infection was then induced by percutaneous introduction into the bladder of approximately 10 mL of a liquid bacterial culture of Escherichia coli, as well as 1–2 mL of molten paraffin to function as a foreign body, a condition necessary to maintain infection.

Three days later, a jugular central venous access was established for the injection of imaging agents, and each piglet underwent all four imaging studies within a period of 2–3 hours. At the time of imaging, the piglets weighed 6–8 kg, approximately the size of a 1-year-old child. Four piglets underwent imaging at the same time, alternating among the four imaging modalities. Therefore, the order of the imaging studies varied among the piglets. After imaging, the kidneys were removed for histopathologic examination.

Anesthesia.—Anesthetic for reflux surgery and jugular cutdown was administered with intramuscular injection of ketamine hydrochloride (20 mg per kilogram of body weight), xylazine hydrochloride (1 mg/kg), and atropine sulfate (0.05 mg/kg). Deep anesthesia for reflux surgery was attained by using inhalation of 2%–3% halothane. Sedation for the imaging studies was achieved with intravenous injection of thiopental sodium (Pentothal [5–10 mg/kg]; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill).

Intestinal gas reduction.—Three to six drops of {alpha}-D-galactosidase enzyme (CurTail; Akpharma, Pleasantville, NJ) was added to the last meal before fasting for imaging.

Scintigraphic Technique
The SPECT technique for 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy was used to make it comparable to the other cross-sectional imaging techniques. The images were obtained 2–3 hours after an intravenous injection of 99mTc-DMSA (Medi-Physics, Arlington Heights, Ill) in a dose of approximately 3.7 MBq/kg (100 µCi/kg). A state-of-the-art triple-detector gamma camera (Multispect; Siemens Medical Systems, Hoffman Estates, Ill) equipped with high-resolution collimators was used. The images were obtained with a 128 x 128 matrix by using a noncircular motion at 3° increments and 30 seconds of imaging time per stop. A total of 120 projectional images (40 images per detector) were obtained. The SPECT images were reconstructed in coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes by using a Butterworth filter with a frequency cutoff of 0.4 cycles per centimeter. The criterion for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis was subjective evidence of focal areas of decreased uptake seen with at least two projections. No attempt was made to quantify the severity of decreased uptake (Fig 1a).



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. (a) Volume-rendered (VR), transverse (T), coronal (C), and sagittal (S) SPECT images demonstrate foci of decreased uptake of 99mTc-DMSA in the upper and lower poles of the right kidney and posterolateral aspect of the lower pole of the left kidney corresponding to foci (arrows) of pyelonephritis at histopathologic examination. Ant = anterior, Post = posterior, Rt = right. (b) Coronal contrast agent-enhanced fast multiplanar inversion recovery MR image (2,000-2,500/17; inversion time, 160 msec) of the same piglet as in a demonstrates foci (arrows) of high signal intensity in the upper and lower poles of the right kidney and the lower pole of the left kidney.

 


View larger version (179K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. (a) Volume-rendered (VR), transverse (T), coronal (C), and sagittal (S) SPECT images demonstrate foci of decreased uptake of 99mTc-DMSA in the upper and lower poles of the right kidney and posterolateral aspect of the lower pole of the left kidney corresponding to foci (arrows) of pyelonephritis at histopathologic examination. Ant = anterior, Post = posterior, Rt = right. (b) Coronal contrast agent-enhanced fast multiplanar inversion recovery MR image (2,000-2,500/17; inversion time, 160 msec) of the same piglet as in a demonstrates foci (arrows) of high signal intensity in the upper and lower poles of the right kidney and the lower pole of the left kidney.

 
MR Imaging Technique
Images were obtained with an MR imaging system (Signa Horizon LX; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) operating at 1.5 T with a phased-array surface coil or paired surface coils. After a localizer sequence was used, images were obtained prior to contrast agent administration with a fast inversion recovery sequence—either fast multiplanar inversion recovery or fast spin-echo inversion recovery. The form of the inversion recovery sequence changed owing to a system software package change. A volumetric fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence was also used prior to administration of contrast agent.

During the intravenous administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ), a repeat fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence was used (acquisition time, 45 seconds) to display the aorta, renal vessels, and perfused renal parenchyma. After the administration of the contrast agent, a fast inversion recovery sequence was used in the coronal and transverse planes. The acquisition was obtained with a coronal section thickness of 5–7 mm, intersection gap of 1 mm, repetition time of 2,000–2,500 msec, echo time of 17 msec, and inversion time of 160 msec, to image the kidneys in a single acquisition. Each fast inversion recovery sequence was used with three signals acquired. The total acquisition time was approximately 3 minutes and 40 seconds. Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo images were obtained with a section thickness of 10 mm. Images were reconstructed with a 256 x 256 matrix. In some cases, a delayed fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence was used for depiction of the high-signal-intensity collecting system produced by excretion of gadolinium.

An initial assessment of the timing of the maximum suppression of the normal renal parenchymal signal intensity by the contrast agent, as imaged with the fast spin-echo inversion recovery sequence, demonstrated a peak effect earlier than had been demonstrated previously by using the fast multiplanar inversion recovery sequence (5). Therefore, coronal fast spin-echo inversion recovery sequences were initiated approximately 1 minute after the administration of the contrast agent, immediately after the fast spoiled gradient-echo acquisition. Images were interpreted as positive for pyelonephritis when there was evidence of a well-defined focus of medium or high signal intensity in the renal cortex, which contrasted with the low signal intensity of normal renal cortical tissue on fast inversion recovery and/or T2-weighted fast spin-echo images (Fig 1b).

Spiral CT Technique
CT imaging (HiSpeed Advantage; GE Medical Systems) was performed at 120 kVp and 140 mAs. Transverse images (3 mm) were obtained by using 1:1 pitch before and after rapid injection of iothalamate meglumine (Conray 43; Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, Mo) in a dose of 3 mL/kg at a rate of 3 mL/sec with a power injector. Two sets of images were obtained 15 and 45 seconds after the beginning of contrast agent injection (ie, 15- and 45-second delay). The criterion for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis was a wedge-shaped, linear, or patchy area of decreased attenuation in the renal cortex (Fig 2). Striation in the enhanced cortex was also considered to represent acute pyelonephritis. The presence of swelling or bulge in the parenchymal outline was noted. Abscess was defined as a focal well-defined area of liquefaction with or without an enhancing rim.



View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Transverse spiral CT scan obtained after intravenous administration of contrast agent demonstrates well-defined foci (arrows) of decreased attenuation in the anterior cortex of the right kidney and posterior cortex of the left kidney.

 
Power Doppler US Technique
Longitudinal gray-scale images were obtained for localization of the kidneys. Power Doppler US (HDL 3000; Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, Wash) was performed by one of the authors (A.R.N.B.) with a curved-array 7-4-MHz transducer. A pulse-repetition frequency of 1,000 Hz and low wall filter were used. The Doppler gain was set just less than noise and was kept constant in each piglet to allow comparison between kidneys. The images were obtained in longitudinal, coronal, and transverse planes, with the piglet supine. The prone position was used when necessary. Areas of decreased or absent cortical perfusion visible on two planes at real time and recorded with color prints were considered diagnostic of pyelonephritis (Fig 3).



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Longitudinal power Doppler US image of the left kidney demonstrates markedly decreased blood flow (arrows) to the lower pole.

 
Histopathologic Evaluation
The kidneys were removed after the piglet had received general anesthetic within 1 hour after completion of all imaging studies. The renal capsule was carefully stripped, and grossly apparent areas of cortical alterations were diagramed. In an attempt to facilitate correlation of histopathologic findings with cross-sectional imaging findings, multiple transverse sections of each kidney were obtained from grossly abnormal and apparent normal renal tissues, including the cortex and medulla. A mean of six transverse sections were obtained from each kidney, most within 1 cm of each other. The large samples were divided into anterior and posterior halves for microscopic examination. Each tissue sample was carefully labeled, fixed in formalin, and embedded in paraffin, and sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin.

The histopathologic criteria for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis were presence of intratubular neutrophils and interstitial infiltrates of mononuclear cells and neutrophils (Fig 4). The location and extent of each lesion were determined on the basis of combined gross and microscopic findings.



View larger version (225K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Photomicrograph shows acute pyelonephritis characterized by the presence of neutrophils (arrow) in the interstitium and in the lumen of a tubule. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, x400.)

 
Analysis of Findings
All images for each modality were interpreted by one of the authors (SPECT by M.M., MR imaging by B.M.M., spiral CT by E.S.R., and power Doppler US by A.R.N.B.) without the knowledge of the findings from other imaging studies or the histopathologic examination. One pathologist (R.C.) examined all histopathologic specimens without knowledge of the imaging findings. For the purpose of comparing the imaging and histopathologic findings, the presence, regardless of the number of the lesions, or absence of pyelonephritis in each kidney was evaluated. The imaging findings were classified as true-positive findings for the affected kidney if at least one histopathologically proved lesion had been correctly diagnosed. In addition, each kidney was arbitrarily divided into three zones—upper, middle, and lower thirds—and the imaging and histopathologic findings were analyzed for the presence of pyelonephritis in each zone.

Statistical Analysis
Commercially available software (SAS/STAT software, version 6; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for statistical analysis. The {kappa} statistics and McNemar test were used to measure the agreement between findings at histopathologic examination with findings from each of the imaging modalities (12). The 95% CIs for the {kappa} values were computed. The {kappa} values were defined as follows: excellent agreement, {kappa} > 0.75; fair to good agreement, {kappa} = 0.40–0.75; poor agreement, {kappa} < 0.40. Results of different imaging modalities for detection of histopathologically positive and negative kidneys and renal zones, assuming blinded and independent evaluation of zones, were also compared with each other by using the Fisher exact test (13). P values less than .05 were considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Histopathologic examination showed evidence of single or multiple foci of acute pyelonephritis in 38 of 70 kidneys and in 102 of 210 renal zones. The sensitivity and specificity of the imaging modalities for the detection of affected kidneys were 92.1% (35 of 38) and 93.8% (30 of 32) for SPECT, 89.5% (34 of 38) and 87.5% (28 of 32) for MR imaging, and 86.8% (33 of 38) and 87.5% (28 of 32) for spiral CT. Power Doppler US examinations of the left kidney in three piglets (histopathologically, two normal kidneys and one with lesions in all three zones) were technically suboptimal due to intestinal gas and were excluded for statistical analysis of the kidneys and renal zones. In another two kidneys, each with a single lesion, positive power Doppler US findings were reported in a location far from the site of histopathologically proved pyelonephritic lesion (false-positive and false-negative results in the same kidney). These kidneys could not be appropriately classified and were excluded for statistical analysis of power Doppler US findings for the detection of pyelonephritis in the kidneys, but they were included for the evaluation of renal zones. The sensitivity and specificity of power Doppler US for the detection of affected kidneys were 74.3% (26 of 35) and 56.7% (17 of 30) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Histopathologic and Imaging Findings in 70 Kidneys
 
The sensitivity and specificity for the detection and localization of the pyelonephritic lesions in the renal zones were 94.1% (96 of 102) and 95.4% (103 of 108) for SPECT, 91.2% (93 of 102) and 92.6% (100 of 108) for MR imaging, 88.2% (90 of 102) and 93.5% (101 of 108) for spiral CT, and 56.6% (56 of 99) and 81.4% (83 of 102) for power Doppler US (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Histopathologic and Imaging Findings in 210 Renal Zones
 
The {kappa} statistics and McNemar test results demonstrate excellent agreement between histopathology and imaging results for 99mTc-DMSA SPECT, MR imaging, and spiral CT for the detection of acute pyelonephritic lesions in the kidneys and renal zones ({kappa} = 0.742–0.895). Agreement between power Doppler US and histopathology results was poor ({kappa} < 0.40). The McNemar test showed P values greater than .05 for the detection of affected kidneys and renal zones for SPECT, MR imaging, and CT. The power Doppler US P value was less than .05 for the detection of affected renal zones but greater than .05 for the detection of affected kidneys. However, it should be noted that false results at power Doppler US in two kidneys were not included in the analysis (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Statistical Comparison of Imaging Findings with Histopathologic Results in the Kidneys and Renal Zones
 
The Fisher exact test comparison of imaging modalities for the detection of histopathologically positive and negative kidneys and renal zones showed no significant difference among SPECT, MR imaging, and CT (P from .216 to >.999). Power Doppler US, however, was significantly less accurate (P < .05) than each of the other modalities, except when compared with CT for the detection of histopathologically positive kidneys (P = .110) (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Statistical Comparison of Imaging Modalities for the Detection of Histopathologically Positive and Negative Kidneys and Renal Zones
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The pathophysiologic mechanisms accounting for the imaging abnormalities of acute pyelonephritis are probably multifactorial. A common factor responsible for the findings at 99mTc-DMSA SPECT, CT, MR imaging, and Doppler US appears to be focal ischemia secondary to an inflammatory response of the kidney to bacterial invasion (14). Results in an experimental study (8) of acute pyelonephritis in rabbits showed focal cortical vasoconstriction and peritubular capillaries clogged with neutrophils. In another study (10) in which the pig model was used, focal ischemia was evidenced by compression of glomeruli, peritubular capillaries, and vasa rectae, presumably from interstitial edema.

Ischemia, as indirectly evidenced by elevated renal vein renin, has been shown to occur early in the inflammatory response to experimental pyelonephritis in primates; this has been attributed to intravascular granulocyte aggregation leading to arteriolar or capillary occlusion (9). In a more recent study (11) in which the microsphere technique was used, substantial focal ischemia was demonstrated in pyelonephritic lesions in piglets. Therefore, one or more of the following factors appear to be operational in the observed imaging findings: (a) focal decreased perfusion due to edema that causes vascular compression and/or intravascular granulocyte aggregation; (b) tubular obstruction due to accumulation of granulocytes and/or edema, which may result in focal decreased glomerular filtration and slow clearance of the filtrates; and (c) altered tubular cell membrane transport mechanism and cell death.

99mTc-DMSA Scintigraphy
Approximately 60% of the administered dose of 99mTc-DMSA is taken up by the proximal tubular cells, mainly through peritubular arterioles and some through filtration and tubular reabsorption (15). The remaining is filtered and excreted in the urine at low concentration. High-spatial-resolution images of the renal cortex can be obtained 2–3 hours after the administration of the tracer by using either planar or SPECT scintigraphic techniques. In the present study, we chose the SPECT technique to facilitate comparison with other cross-sectional imaging modalities.

Although there is a theoretic advantage to SPECT imaging, results of an experimental piglet study (4) have shown that planar imaging with pinhole magnification and SPECT imaging are almost equally sensitive and reliable for detecting acute pyelonephritis. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity for 99mTc-DMSA SPECT observed in this study are probably achievable for planar imaging with a small-aperture (<4 mm) pinhole magnification. Decreased uptake of 99mTc-DMSA in the early phase of acute pyelonephritis appears to be primarily due to ischemia. In later stages, additional factors, such as tubular obstruction and resultant decreased filtration and reabsorption, and eventually cellular dysfunction and destruction, become operational (11).

MR Imaging
MR imaging has been shown to be highly effective in the diagnosis of both medical and surgical diseases of the kidney (1620). More recently, MR imaging with the fast inversion recovery sequence with intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine has been shown to be a sensitive imaging method for the detection of acute pyelonephritis in the experimental pig model (5) and in a clinical study of acute pyelonephritis in children (21). This sequence markedly reduces the signal intensity of normal renal parenchyma and allows the pyelonephritic lesions to be seen as focal zones of medium or high signal intensity against the background low signal intensity of normal renal tissue (Figs 1b, 5b).



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5a. (a) Volume-rendered (VR), transverse (T), coronal (C), and sagittal (S) SPECT images show a small focus (arrows) of acute pyelonephritis in the medial aspect of the lower pole of the left kidney. Ant = anterior, Post = posterior, Rt = right. (b) Coronal fast multiplanar inversion recovery MR image (2,000-2,500/17; inversion time, 160 msec) of the same piglet as in a demonstrates a small focus (arrow) of acute pyelonephritis in the medial aspect of the lower pole of the left kidney corresponding to the abnormality seen in a.

 


View larger version (186K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5b. (a) Volume-rendered (VR), transverse (T), coronal (C), and sagittal (S) SPECT images show a small focus (arrows) of acute pyelonephritis in the medial aspect of the lower pole of the left kidney. Ant = anterior, Post = posterior, Rt = right. (b) Coronal fast multiplanar inversion recovery MR image (2,000-2,500/17; inversion time, 160 msec) of the same piglet as in a demonstrates a small focus (arrow) of acute pyelonephritis in the medial aspect of the lower pole of the left kidney corresponding to the abnormality seen in a.

 
The exact mechanisms for this signal lowering effect are not clearly understood. The relative contributions of gadolinium’s T1 and T2 effects vary with different concentrations of the paramagnetic agent; and this is combined with the complex T1 and T2 phenomena of the inversion recovery sequence. A microscopic magnetic field heterogeneity effect may be partly responsible, as there are microscopic gradients in the concentration of gadolinium along the loops of Henle and in the distal collecting tubules (22,23). Tissues that are poorly perfused or cannot concentrate gadolinium would not display this normal signal intensity lowering effect.

In our study, differences in the MR pulse sequences played a role in the overall tissue signal intensities, tissue contrast, sequence timing, and MR artifact production. The fast spin-echo inversion recovery sequence showed less signal suppression of the normal renal parenchyma, lower contrast between the inflamed and normal parenchyma, and increased motion artifact as compared with the fast multiplanar inversion recovery sequence. This may have had an effect on measured diagnostic accuracy, but our results represent the overall accuracy of blinded interpretation of the images as obtained. However, the contrast-enhanced inversion-recovery technique compares favorably with renal cortical scintigraphic technique. Tiny amounts of gas and urinary tract stones might best be depicted with CT (24). However, gas-forming infections are extremely rare in children, and, in the absence of urinary tract obstruction or metabolic disease, calculi are rare in the setting of pyelonephritis in children. The whole MR imaging examination is readily accomplished in a time frame suitable for a clinical imaging examination, although the method requires sedation in most young pediatric patients.

Spiral CT Scanning
The lesions of acute pyelonephritis typically appear as wedge-shaped, ill-defined, or striated areas of decreased attenuation on both conventional and spiral contrast-enhanced CT scans (2426). All three patterns were seen in our study. The CT findings are primarily due to decreased perfusion and, to a lesser extent, tubular obstruction and slow clearance of the contrast agents from the involved regions. The striated nephrogram is thought to be due to obstructed tubules with intervening normal tubules (27,28).

With spiral CT, there is rapid acquisition of data. This allows the kidney to be imaged in multiple phases of intravenous contrast enhancement by varying the scanning delay time. Depending on the delay, three different phases can be imaged; the cortical phase, which yields the best corticomedullary differentiation; the parenchymal phase, in which both the cortex and medullary pyramids are enhanced; and the excretory phase (26).

The piglets in our study were imaged during the cortical phase (15-second delay) and during the parenchymal phase (45-second delay). The full extent of the lesions were better depicted during the parenchymal phase, which is similar to previously reported results (26,29,30). This observation is in keeping with the fact that acute pyelonephritis involves both the cortex and medulla. It was interesting to note that some lesions seen during the cortical phase exhibited a larger area of abnormality in the cortex during the parenchymal phase. There were even occasions on which the cortex appeared nearly normal during the cortical phase and then became abnormal during the parenchymal phase. This change in the size of the lesion or appearance of the cortical abnormality during the parenchymal phase was also noted by others (24,26). The reason for this is not clear; however, this further supports imaging of the kidney during the parenchymal phase for the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis.

Power Doppler US
A clinical study (31) comparing power Doppler US and conventional CT in 30 children reported sensitivity for power Doppler US detection of pyelonephritis to be only slightly lower than that of CT. This study (31) had limitations, since uncooperative children were excluded, and there was no independent standard of reference for proof of pyelonephritic lesions. In another study (32) of 12 children with a clinical diagnosis of pyelonephritis, power Doppler US yielded a lower detection rate of 75% as compared with rates at scintigraphy or contrast-enhanced CT. In our study, power Doppler US was significantly less sensitive and specific than were the other imaging modalities.

The reasons for high false-positive and high false-negative results with power Doppler US are not clear. They may include insufficient ischemia and technical factors, such as interference from intestinal gas, breathing motion, and rib artifact. Although the piglets were sedated, heavy breathing motions and hiccups were sometimes a problem. Similarly, breathing motion in a crying infant or uncooperative child can be a major restricting factor.

Power Doppler US is based on the integrated Doppler power spectrum. This parameter is fundamentally different from the mean frequency shift. The frequency is determined by the velocity of the red blood cells, whereas the power depends on the number of red blood cells (volume of blood). Therefore, a plausible explanation for false-negative results at power Doppler US during the early phase of acute pyelonephritis is partial venous obstruction due to edema that leads to increased volume and sluggish flow of blood through the involved part of the kidney.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Imaging Modalities for Clinical Use
Both MR imaging and power Doppler US have the advantage of not using ionizing radiation. They both allow evaluation of the perinephric space. However, power Doppler US has poor sensitivity and specificity, and routine use of MR imaging is less practical because of limited availability, need for sedation, and high cost. Spiral CT can be performed quickly and often without sedation. It is highly sensitive and specific. However, it requires rapid intravenous injection of a large volume of contrast agent and is associated with high radiation dose. The 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphic technique is highly sensitive and specific for the detection of acute pyelonephritis, and in our experience it can be performed without the use of sedation in more than 90% of infants and children. It is readily available and its cost is reasonable. More important, it allows qualitative and quantitative assessment of individual renal function that at the present time is not feasible with other imaging modalities. The major disadvantage of 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy is the use of ionizing radiation. However, the radiation absorbed dose from 99mTc-DMSA scanning is lower than that from spiral CT scanning.

The estimated radiation dose to the kidneys (target organ) of a 1-year-old child from 99mTc-DMSA is 0.78 mGy/MBq administered dose (33). Our standard administered dose of 99mTc-DMSA in clinical studies is approximately 1.85 MBq/kg (50 µCi/kg), with a minimum dose of 18.5 MBq. Therefore, the estimated dose to the kidneys of a 1-year-old child is approximately 14.4 mGy, which is almost identical to the radiation dose to the entire abdomen from one spiral CT study. The radiation dose delivered to the abdomen of the piglets from spiral CT in our study was estimated by actual measurement of the dose by using a cylindric polymerized methyl methacrylate phantom, same spiral CT scanner, and same technical factors. The measurements showed a mean dose of 14.0 mGy ± 0.5 (SD) at the central location and 14.7 mGy ± 0.5 for the outer locations. The radiation dose from spiral CT would naturally be greater if a precontrast scan and more than one contrast-enhanced scan are obtained.

The limitation of this study is that all images from each modality were interpreted once by a single reader without evaluation of intra- and interobserver agreement.

In summary, the sensitivity and specificity of four cross-sectional imaging modalities for the detection of experimentally induced acute pyelonephritis were evaluated by using strict histopathologic criteria as the standard of reference. The pairwise comparison showed no significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity among 99mTc-DMSA SPECT, spiral CT, and MR imaging, but power Doppler US was significantly less reliable. However, with future advances in Doppler US, its role should be reexamined. At the present time, 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy and spiral CT appear to be the most practical studies for routine clinical use.

Practical application: The porcine kidney is morphologically and physiologically similar to the human kidney. Furthermore, the piglets used in this study were approximately the size of a 1-year-old child. Therefore, the results of this study seem applicable to the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in infants and children. With the exception of power Doppler US results, the information gained from this experimental study also seems applicable to adults.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviation: DMSA = dimercaptosuccinic acid

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, M.M.; study concepts and design, M.M.; definition of intellectual content, M.M.; literature research, M.M., B.M.M., A.R.N.B., E.S.R.; experimental studies, H.G.R., H.G.P., J.S.P., K.R.B.; data acquisition, M.M., B.M.M., E.S.R., A.R.N.B., R.C., N.P.; data analysis, M.M., B.M.M., A.R.N.B., E.S.R.; statistical analysis, K.M.P.; manuscript preparation, M.M., B.M.M., A.R.N.B., E.S.R.; manuscript editing, M.M.; manuscript review, E.S.R., H.G.R., M.M., B.M.M., A.R.N.B.; manuscript final version approval, M.M.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Majd M, Rushton HG, Jantausch B, Wiedermann BL. Relationship among vesicoureteral reflux, P-fimbriated Escherichia coli, and acute pyelonephritis in children with febrile urinary tract infection. J Pediatr 1991; 119:578-585.[Medline]
  2. Rushton HG, Majd M, Chandra R, Yim D. Evaluation of 99m technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scans in experimental acute pyelonephritis in piglets. J Urol 1988; 140:1169-1174.[Medline]
  3. Parkhouse HF, Godley ML, Cooper J, Risdon RA, Ransley PG. Renal imaging with 99mTc-labelled DMSA in the detection of acute pyelonephritis: an experimental study in the pig. Nucl Med Commun 1989; 10:63-70.[Medline]
  4. Majd M, Rushton HG, Chandra R, Andrich MP, Tardif CP, Rashti F. Technetium 99m-DMSA renal cortical scintigraphy for the detection of experimental acute pyelonephritis in piglets: comparison of planar (pinhole) and SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:1731-1734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Pennington DJ, Lonergan GJ, Flack CE, Waguespack RL, Jackson CB. Experimental pyelonephritis in piglets: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 201:199-205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Majd M, Shalaby-Rana E, Rushton HG, Chandra R. Diagnosis of experimental pyelonephritis in piglets: comparison of CT and Tc-99m DMSA scintigraphy (abstr). Radiology 1994; 193(P):136.
  7. Björgvinson E, Majd M, Eggli KD. Diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis in children: comparison of sonography and 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157:539-543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hill GS, Clark RL. A comparative angiographic, microangiographic and histologic study of experimental pyelonephritis. Invest Radiol 1972; 7:33-47.[Medline]
  9. Haack MB, Dowling KJ, Patterson GM, Roberts JA. Immunology of pyelonephritis. VIII. E. coli causes granulocytic aggregation and renal ischemia. J Urol 1986; 136:1117-1122.[Medline]
  10. Androulakakis PA, Ransley PG, Risdon RA, Sorger K, Hohenfellner R. Microvascular changes in the early stage of reflux pyelonephritis: an experimental study in the pig kidney. Eur Urol 1987; 13:219-223.[Medline]
  11. Majd M, Rushton HG. Renal cortical scintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis. Semin Nucl Med 1992; 22:98-111.[Medline]
  12. Cohen J. Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20:37-46.
  13. Armitage P. Statistical methods in medical research New York, NY: Wiley, 1971; 135-138.
  14. Roberts JA. Etiology and pathophysiology of pyelonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 1991; 17:1-9.
  15. De Lange MJ, Piers DA, Kosterink JGW, et al. Renal handling of technetium-99m DMSA: evidence for glomerular filtration and peritubular uptake. J Nucl Med 1989; 30:1219-1223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Huch Böni RA, Debatin JF, Krestin GP. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the kidneys and adrenal glands. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1996; 4:101-131.[Medline]
  17. Brown ED, Semelka RC. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen. Magn Reson Q 1994; 10:97-124.[Medline]
  18. Kikinis R, von Schulthess GK, Jager P, et al. Normal and hydronephrotic kidney: evaluation of renal function with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 165:837-842.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gilfeather M, Woodward PJ. MR imaging of the adrenal glands and kidneys. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1998; 19:53-66.[Medline]
  20. Carvlin MJ, Arger PH, Kundel HL, et al. Use of Gd-DTPA and fast gradient-echo and spin-echo MR imaging to demonstrate renal function in the rabbit. Radiology 1989; 170:705-711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lonergan GJ, Pennington DJ, Morrison JC, Haws RM, Grimley MS, Kao TC. Childhood pyelonephritis: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and renal cortical scintigraphy for diagnosis. Radiology 1998; 207:377-384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Barnhart JL, Kuhnert N, Bakan DA, Berk RN. Biodistribution of GdCl3 and Gd-DTPA and their influence on proton magnetic relaxation in rat tissues. Magn Reson Imaging 1987; 5:221-231.[Medline]
  23. Choyke PL, Frank JA, Girton ME, et al. Dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of the kidney: experimental results. Radiology 1989; 170:713-720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kaplan DM, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC. Advances in the imaging of renal infection: helical CT and modern coordinated imaging. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997; 11:681-705.[Medline]
  25. Soulen MC, Fishman EK, Goldman SJ, Gatewood OMB. Bacterial renal infection: role of CT. Radiology 1989; 171:703-707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Goldman SM, Raval BK, Fishman EK. CT of renal inflammatory disease. RadioGraphics 1997; 17:851-866.[Abstract]
  27. Gold RP, McClennan BL, Rottenberg RR. CT appearance of acute inflammatory abscess and the renal interstitium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 141:343-349.[Free Full Text]
  28. Papanicolaou N, Pfister RC. Acute renal infections. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34:965-995.[Medline]
  29. Herts BR, Einstein DM, Paushter DM. Spiral CT of the abdomen: artifacts and potential pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:1185-1190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rubin GD, Silverman SG. Helical (spiral) CT of the retroperitoneum. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:903-932.[Medline]
  31. Dacher JN, Pfister C, Moroc M, Eurin D, Le Dosseur P. Power Doppler sonographic patterns of acute pyelonephritis in children: comparison with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:1451-1455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Winters WD. Power Doppler sonographic evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in children. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15:91-96.[Abstract]
  33. Stabin MG. Internal dosimetry in pediatric nuclear medicine. In: Treves ST, eds. Pediatric nuclear medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1995; 556-581.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
W. D. Craig, B. J. Wagner, and M. D. Travis
From the Archives of the AFIP: Pyelonephritis: Radiologic-Pathologic Review
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 255 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Boubaker, J. O. Prior, J.-Y. Meuwly, and A. Bischof-Delaloye
Radionuclide Investigations of the Urinary Tract in the Era of Multimodality Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 1819 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. H. Lowe, M. N. Patel, J. M. Gatti, and U. S. Alon
Utility of Follow-up Renal Sonography in Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux and Normal Initial Sonogram
Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 548 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Hitzel, A. Liard, P. Vera, A. Manrique, J.-F. Menard, and J.-N. Dacher
Color and Power Doppler Sonography Versus DMSA Scintigraphy in Acute Pyelonephritis and in Prediction of Renal Scarring
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2002; 43(1): 27 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Mackenzie
Controversies in the radiological investigation of paediatric urinary tract infection
Imaging, December 1, 2001; 13(4): 285 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majd, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rushton, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majd, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rushton, H. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE