Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
(Radiology. 2001;218:621-641.)
© RSNA, 2001


State of the Art

Pelvic Floor Imaging1

Jaap Stoker, MD, PhD, Steve Halligan, MD, MRCP, FRCR and Clive I. Bartram, FRCR, FRCP, FRCS

1 From the Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.S.), and the Intestinal Imaging Centre, St Mark’s Hospital, London, England (S.H., C.I.B.). Received June 18, 1999; revision requested August 9; revision received November 9; accepted November 16; updated September 28, 2000. Address correspondence to J.S. (e-mail: j.stoker@amc.uva.nl).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
A greater awareness of the therapies now available for pelvic floor dysfunction has increased demand for specialized imaging of this region. Some of the techniques required are available at relatively few centers, and the purpose of this review is to introduce the emerging subspecialty of pelvic floor imaging to a more general readership. Pelvic floor anatomy is complex and is being unraveled by means of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. This is discussed in detail by using a global, rather than a compartmentalized, anatomic approach. The physiology of normal urinary and anal function and the routine clinical tests applied to them are outlined. The imaging techniques involved include MR imaging, endosonography, and fluoroscopy. The main investigations include video urodynamic imaging, evacuation proctography, dynamic cystoproctography, dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor, and endoluminal imaging of the anal sphincters with MR imaging and ultrasonography. These are described in detail, and their role with regard to the main pathologic conditions of the pelvic floor—urinary and anal incontinence, constipation, and prolapse—are discussed.

Index terms: Bladder, abnormalities, 83.832, 83.835 • Colon, abnormalities, 75.133, 75.15, 75.27, 75.73, 75.79, 75.791 • Colon, MR, 75.121411, 75.121412 • Colon, US, 75.12981, 75.12989 • Pelvic organs, 80.11 • Pelvic organs, MR, 80.121411, 80.121412 • Pelvic organs, US, 80.12981, 80.12989 • State of the Art • Urine, incontinence, 82.835


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
The pelvic floor is a complex system, with passive and active components that provide pelvic support, maintain continence, and coordinate relaxation during urination and defecation. Dysfunction may manifest as prolapse, incontinence, pelvic pain, or constipation. Imaging is becoming increasingly central to the management of pelvic floor dysfunction. The success of medical and surgical treatments coupled with a growing awareness among primary physicians and the general public of investigative and therapeutic possibilities are leading to an increasing number of referrals to radiologists with a special interest in this field (1). However, detailed knowledge of pelvic floor imaging is not widespread within the radiologic community. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of imaging in the diagnosis of adult male and female patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. More attention will be given to pelvic floor diseases in women, in whom these conditions are more prevalent.


    ANATOMY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
A basic knowledge of pelvic floor anatomy is fundamental to the imaging interpretation and understanding of dysfunction. The pelvic floor is classically divided into three compartments: anterior, middle, and posterior, to which a fourth compartment, the peritoneal cavity and fascia, is sometimes added. This segregation reflects historical boundaries between the various professional groups involved and is, to a large extent, artificial, because the pelvic floor structures are closely interrelated and patients with abnormalities in one compartment often have disorders in others (13). The anatomy of the pelvic floor will be described in an integrated fashion, with greater emphasis on female anatomy.

Pelvic Floor
The pelvic floor is a complex, integrated, multilayer system that provides active and passive support. Fascia and ligaments provide passive support, while the muscles of the pelvic floor, mainly the levator ani, provide active support. The fascia is attached to the bone ring of the pelvis, with the ligaments formed from fascial condensations. The pelvic floor has three layers from superior to inferior: the pelvic fascia, pelvic diaphragm, and urogenital diaphragm, with their associated supportive structures, which are intimately related to the urogenital region, urethra, anal sphincter, and vagina in women.

Pelvic Fascia
Pelvic fasciae are delicate structures, most of which are below imaging resolution. The most cephalad layer covers the levator ani muscle and viscera in a continuous sheet. At the uterine level, this layer is called the parametrium; at the vaginal level, it is called the paracolpium (4). Two dense aggregations of obturator and levator ani fasciae, the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis and arcus tendineus levator ani, provide important passive lateral support (Figs 1, 2). The arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis provides lateral anchoring for the anterior vaginal wall where it underlies and supports the urethra, while the arcus tendineus levator ani provides anchoring for the levator ani muscles. The arcus tendineus levator ani can be identified on magnetic resonance (MR) images as the origin of a part the levator ani muscle (iliococcygeus muscle) at the internal obturator fascia (Figs 24) (4). The arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis (Figs 1, 2), although visualized at high-spatial-resolution MR imaging in a cadaver (5), is difficult to identify with certainty in vivo. This is due to the difficulty in differentiating this fascial aggregation from other closely aligned fascial structures and vessels.



View larger version (0K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Permission to reprint this figure electronically was denied by the publisher. Please see print version.

 


View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Drawing shows the retropubic space (space of Retzius) viewed from above, with the bladder and vagina transected at a level just below the bladder, revealing the attachment of the vagina to the levator ani muscles. ATFP = arcus tendineus fascia pelvis, ATLA = arcus tendineus levator ani, LA = levator ani muscles, OIF = obturatorius internus fascia, PS = pubic symphysis, PVM = pubovesical muscle, PVP = periurethral vascular plexus, R = rectum, U = urethra, VLA = vaginolevator attachment, VW = vaginal wall. (Reprinted, with permission, from reference 6.)

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. (a) Midvaginal coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 2,826/120) MR image obtained with an endovaginal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 23-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer demonstrate the vaginal wall (VW), urogenital diaphragm (UG), puborectal muscle (PR), bulbocavernous muscle (BC), levator ani muscle (LA), internal obturator muscle (IOM), arcus tendineus levator ani (ATLA), bladder (B), and uterus (UT).

 


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. (a) Midvaginal coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 2,826/120) MR image obtained with an endovaginal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 23-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer demonstrate the vaginal wall (VW), urogenital diaphragm (UG), puborectal muscle (PR), bulbocavernous muscle (BC), levator ani muscle (LA), internal obturator muscle (IOM), arcus tendineus levator ani (ATLA), bladder (B), and uterus (UT).

 


View larger version (196K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. (a) Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained through the anterior anal sphincter complex with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 30-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer demonstrate the internal sphincter (IS), external sphincter (ES), puborectal muscle (PR), levator ani muscle (LA), arcus tendineus levator ani (ATLA), internal obturator muscle (IOM), and urogenital diaphragm (UG).

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. (a) Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained through the anterior anal sphincter complex with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 30-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer demonstrate the internal sphincter (IS), external sphincter (ES), puborectal muscle (PR), levator ani muscle (LA), arcus tendineus levator ani (ATLA), internal obturator muscle (IOM), and urogenital diaphragm (UG).

 
The structure of these fasciae differs greatly from connective tissue that forms the tendons and ligaments in other parts of the body. For example, the endopelvic fascia comprises a meshwork of collagen, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, elastin, and neurovascular and fibrovascular bundles (4,6).

Pelvic Diaphragm
The levator ani is the major muscle of the pelvic diaphragm; it is attached to the pubis and supportive fascia by the arcus tendineus levator ani (Figs 35). The levator ani is readily visible at MR imaging. Several segments of the levator ani have been described in terms of their visceral insertions, although these are inseparable parts of a single unit (5). The ventromedial part of the levator ani, variously called the pubococcygeus muscle, pubovisceralis muscle, or puborectal muscle, is a thick, slinglike bundle of fibers arising from the inner aspect of the pubis, passing beside the urethra, vagina (Figs 3, 6), and anorectum (Figs 5, 7), and attaching to the vagina and anorectum (5). The slinglike configuration of the ventromedial part of the puborectal muscle may give the false impression that it is a separate muscle. Tonic contraction of the two parts of this sling closes the urogenital and anorectal hiatus, which provides a supportive platform during normal activity and standing. Constant tone is maintained by means of slow-twitch (type I) muscle fibers (7). The iliococcygeus and coccygeus muscles also are part of the levator ani. The origin of the iliococcygeus muscle is the arcus tendineus levator ani (Figs 24). The levator ani is innervated by sacral nerve roots S2 through S4 via the pudendal nerve.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5a. (a) Coronal midanal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 21-year-old asymptomatic male volunteer demonstrate the internal sphincter (IS), intersphincteric space (ISS), longitudinal muscle (LM), external sphincter (ES), puborectal muscle (PR), and levator ani muscle (LA).

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5b. (a) Coronal midanal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 21-year-old asymptomatic male volunteer demonstrate the internal sphincter (IS), intersphincteric space (ISS), longitudinal muscle (LM), external sphincter (ES), puborectal muscle (PR), and levator ani muscle (LA).

 


View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6a. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,826/120) MR image obtained with an endovaginal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in an asymptomatic 31-year-old female volunteer show the vaginal wall (VW), puborectal muscle (PR), urethral smooth muscle (SM) and striated muscle (ST), urethral mucosa and submucosa (MS), urethropelvic (or parapelvic) ligament (UP) and parapelvic ligament (PU), anorectum (A), and internal anal sphincter (IS).

 


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6b. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,826/120) MR image obtained with an endovaginal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in an asymptomatic 31-year-old female volunteer show the vaginal wall (VW), puborectal muscle (PR), urethral smooth muscle (SM) and striated muscle (ST), urethral mucosa and submucosa (MS), urethropelvic (or parapelvic) ligament (UP) and parapelvic ligament (PU), anorectum (A), and internal anal sphincter (IS).

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7a. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained through the upper part of the anal sphincter with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in an asymptomatic 30-year-old female volunteer show the internal sphincter (IS), longitudinal muscle (LM), puborectal muscle (PR), vagina (V), urethral mucosa and submucosa (MS), urethral smooth muscle (SM) and striated muscle (ST), urethropelvic (or parapelvic) ligament (UP), and parapelvic ligament (PU).

 


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7b. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained through the upper part of the anal sphincter with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in an asymptomatic 30-year-old female volunteer show the internal sphincter (IS), longitudinal muscle (LM), puborectal muscle (PR), vagina (V), urethral mucosa and submucosa (MS), urethral smooth muscle (SM) and striated muscle (ST), urethropelvic (or parapelvic) ligament (UP), and parapelvic ligament (PU).

 
Urogenital Diaphragm
The urogenital diaphragm, also called the deep perineal space or perineal membrane, is situated caudal to the pelvic diaphragm and anterior to the anorectum. In men, it lies directly superior to the root of the penis and inferior to the prostate gland. The urogenital diaphragm is penetrated by the urethra and additionally by the vagina in women. The primary muscle of the urogenital diaphragm is the deep transverse muscle of the perineum, which originates at the inner surface of the ischial ramus and is readily visible at MR imaging (Figs 3, 4). The urogenital diaphragm has attachments to surrounding structures, including the vagina, perineal body, external anal sphincter, and bulbocavernous muscle (8). The puborectal (pubococcygeus) muscle courses directly superior to the urogenital diaphragm toward the pubic bone (Fig 3).

Urethra
The female urethra is approximately 4.5 cm long, with two-thirds of the urethra above the levator ani (pelvic diaphragm). The proximal one-third of the female urethra and the proximal (prostatic) male urethra are lined with transitional cell epithelium. The more distal portion of the urethra is lined with (pseudo-) stratified columnar epithelium. Infoldings of urothelial tissue with rich submucosal vascular plexuses, mucosal secretions, and urethral smooth muscle all contribute to passive urethral closure (urethral coaptation, mucosal seal) (9,10).

The urethral sphincter is composed of involuntary inner smooth muscle that is continuous with the bladder, as well as the voluntary external sphincter (rhabdosphincter), which is composed of striated muscle. Mucosa and submucosa, inner smooth muscle, and external urethral striated sphincter are readily visible at high-resolution MR imaging in all individuals (Figs 6, 7). The inner smooth muscle sphincter extends throughout the proximal two-thirds of the urethra, and its tension is distributed relatively uniformly and contributes to about one-third of intraurethral pressure (10). The smooth muscle of the urethra has high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images and demonstrates enhancement after intravenous administration of contrast medium (8). This manifestation is common to smooth muscle sphincters, including the smooth muscle internal anal sphincter. Although this manifestation probably is related to the specific histologic characteristics of smooth muscles, no definite explanation is available, to our knowledge.

The external sphincter contributes mainly to resting pressure by means of slow-twitch muscle fibers. The urogenital diaphragm muscle (deep transverse muscle of the perineum) predominantly contributes to voluntary and reflex muscle contraction. There is debate with regard to the neural pathways to the external urethral sphincter (11).

Urethral and Bladder Neck Supporting Structures
Fascial and ligamentous support of the urethra and the bladder neck is vital to preserve urinary continence. Recent research with cadaver dissection in combination with MR imaging has provided insights into the anatomy of urethral and bladder neck support. However, the exact anatomy remains to be established, and the terminology used is confusing. A description of the most important structures will be provided in this article, but for a detailed description the reader is referred to other sources (4,8,1215).

Vesicopelvic, urethropelvic, and pubourethral ligaments and fascia give anterior and lateral support to the bladder neck and urethra by means of attachment to the pubic bone and arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis (Fig 2) (12,13). Current research with high-resolution MR imaging in cadavers and in vivo is directed to revealing which ligaments and muscles can be identified. The urethropelvic ligaments can be easily identified with high-resolution MR imaging in almost all individuals, but there is no consensus about whether these structures insert directly into the levator ani muscle or through another (periurethral) ligament (Figs 6, 7) (8,13). Other ligaments between the urethra and pubic arch (pubourethral ligament) and between the bladder and pubic arch (vesicopelvic ligament) can be identified in some individuals. The pubovesical ligament or muscle (Fig 2), an extension of detrusor smooth muscle coursing through the retropubic space to the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis, has been identified at high-resolution MR imaging in a cadaver (5) and may assist in opening the bladder neck during voiding. Bladder neck position is influenced by connections between the puborectal muscle, vagina, and proximal urethra (16).

Urogenital Region
The urogenital region forms the superficial part of the anterior pelvic floor. The external genital muscles—the superficial transverse muscle of the perineum, the bulbocavernous (bulbospongiosus) muscle, and the ischiocavernous muscle—lie within this region, as does the urethrovaginal sphincter in women (Fig 8). The urethrogenital sphincter encircles the urethra and vagina. This sphincter has been considered part of the deep transverse muscle of the perineum (urogenital diaphragm), but the authors of a recent endovaginal MR imaging study (8) suggested that it might be part of the puborectal (pubococcygeus) muscle. In women, the bulbocavernous muscles inserts into the pubic arch and the root and dorsum of the clitoris and has attachments to the vagina and urogenital diaphragm (8). The external genital muscles are visible with high-resolution MR imaging in all individuals (Fig 8).



View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8a. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained through the lower edge of the anal sphincter with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 25-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer show the external sphincter (ES), anococcygeal ligament (AC), bulbocavernous muscle (BC), ischiocavernous muscle (IC), superficial transverse perineal muscle (STP), and vaginal introitus (VI).

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8b. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained through the lower edge of the anal sphincter with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 25-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer show the external sphincter (ES), anococcygeal ligament (AC), bulbocavernous muscle (BC), ischiocavernous muscle (IC), superficial transverse perineal muscle (STP), and vaginal introitus (VI).

 
Vagina
The vaginal wall is composed of smooth muscle and connective tissue (collagen and elastin) (4). The anterior wall is bridged bilaterally between the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis (Fig 1) (4,17). This "hammock" of vaginal tissue lies beneath the urethra and may be a vital component of urinary continence (12,18). The urethra is compressed against this tissue when abdominal pressure is increased, as during coughing (12). The vagina is attached to the levator ani at the level of the urogenital diaphragm (16). Its wall is surrounded by adipose tissue containing an extensive venous plexus. Posteriorly, this forms the rectovaginal septum.

Perineal Body
Directly anterior to the anal sphincter is the perineal body (central tendon of the perineum). In men, it is posterior to the spongious and cavernous bodies and their related muscles, whereas in women it lies within the anovaginal septum (Fig 9). Many structures insert fibers into the perineal body, including the external anal sphincter, the deep and superficial transverse muscles of the perineum (urogenital diaphragm), and the bulbocavernous and puborectalis (pubococcygeus) muscles. The superficial transverse muscle of the perineum spans the dorsal edge of the urogenital diaphragm and elevates the perineal body.



View larger version (179K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9a. (a) Midanal sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,826/120) MR image obtained with endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 30-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer demonstrates the internal sphincter (IS), longitudinal muscle (LM), external sphincter (ES), puborectal muscle (PR), levator ani muscle (LA), perineal body (P), vagina (V), urethra (U), bladder (B), and rectum (R) (window settings optimized for demonstration of the external sphincter).

 


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9b. (a) Midanal sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,826/120) MR image obtained with endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 30-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer demonstrates the internal sphincter (IS), longitudinal muscle (LM), external sphincter (ES), puborectal muscle (PR), levator ani muscle (LA), perineal body (P), vagina (V), urethra (U), bladder (B), and rectum (R) (window settings optimized for demonstration of the external sphincter).

 
Anal Sphincter
The anal canal sphincter contains muscular and neurovascular components and is surrounded by the fat-containing ischioanal space. The epithelial lining of the distal part of the anal canal is stratified squamous epithelium, richly supplied by sensory receptors that are concentrated mostly at the dentate line. This line demarcates the junction with the proximal columnar epithelium, which is devoid of sensory receptors. The mechanism of anal continence is similar to that of urinary control, with the anal lining and its underlying vascular spaces, the anal cushions, playing a major role in sealing the anal canal (19). The anal sphincters form two cylindric layers between which lies the longitudinal muscle (Fig 5). The intersphincteric space is a plane, composed of fat, usually located between the longitudinal muscle and external sphincter.

The internal sphincter forms the innermost muscular layer and is the terminal condensation of the circular rectal smooth muscle (Fig 5). The internal sphincter extends from the anorectal junction to approximately 1–11/2 cm below the dentate line. It is composed of smooth muscle fibers with autonomous innervation from sympathetic presacral nerves. The longitudinal muscle (Fig 5) is the continuation of the longitudinal muscle of the rectal wall. There is a large fibroelastic element derived from the pelvic fascia that invests both sphincters. The longitudinal muscle is closely related to the subcutaneous external sphincter. Some authors have stated that the longitudinal muscle ends in the subcutaneous external sphincter, while others have stated that this muscle passes through the subcutaneous external sphincter to terminate in the perianal skin (20).

The external sphincter is the outermost muscle of the distal anal canal (Figs 5, 8, 10) and is composed of several parallel bundles (20). It is a circular structure and is shorter anteriorly in women, approximately 11/2 cm. The external sphincter extends approximately 1 cm beyond the internal sphincter (Fig 5). The deep part of the external sphincter is fused with or intimately related to the puborectalis muscle. Anteriorly, it is closely related to the superficial transverse muscle of the perineum and the perineal body (Figs 8, 9). Posteriorly, the muscle is continuous with the anococcygeal ligament (Figs 810). All sphincter muscles are readily seen at endoanal MR imaging. The muscle is under voluntary control and is innervated by the pudendal nerves (S2 through S4). The puborectalis muscle has separate innervation from S3 and S4.



View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 10a. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained through the lower part of the anal sphincter with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 40-year-old asymptomatic male volunteer show the internal sphincter (IS), longitudinal muscle (LM), intersphincteric space (ISS), external sphincter (ES), anococcygeal ligament (AC), and bulbocavernous muscle (BC).

 


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 10b. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained through the lower part of the anal sphincter with an endoanal coil and (b) corresponding drawing in a 40-year-old asymptomatic male volunteer show the internal sphincter (IS), longitudinal muscle (LM), intersphincteric space (ISS), external sphincter (ES), anococcygeal ligament (AC), and bulbocavernous muscle (BC).

 
Normal variants of anal sphincter anatomy have been identified, such as differing relationships between the superficial transverse perineal muscle and the external sphincter (21). The inferior edge of the external sphincter may have a closed circular configuration or may be open anteriorly and posteriorly. After trauma (eg, obstetric), the anal sphincter anatomy may be disturbed without clinical symptoms (22,23). These findings may possibly be related to late-onset incontinence.


    PHYSIOLOGY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Urinary Continence
The mechanism of urinary control has been intensively studied, but its elucidation remains incomplete. Urinary continence requires integration of the central and peripheral nervous systems, the bladder wall and detrusor muscle, the bladder neck, the urethra, and the pelvic support structures (10). Central nervous system perception of bladder filling results in the generation of efferent impulses that inhibit bladder contraction. Increased intraabdominal pressure is countered by urethral closure, which requires adequate pelvic support (9). Passive urethral closure is reliant on good urethral coaptation from a mucosal seal formed by the submucosal vascular plexuses and urethral smooth muscle (9). The pelvic floor reflexly contracts in response to sudden increases in abdominal pressure, resulting in active urethral closure and passive compression. It is widely believed that increased intraabdominal pressure simultaneously increases intravesicular and intraurethral pressure because the bladder neck and the proximal female urethra normally lie above the pelvic floor (24). Alternatively, it has been suggested that urethral compression against the endopelvic fascia and vagina are responsible for closure—the "hammock hypothesis" (12).

Micturition
The bladder can accommodate large volumes without substantially increased intravesicular pressure because of the passive viscoelastic properties of the smooth muscle and connective tissue of its wall. Filling leads to reflex stimulation of {alpha}-adrenergic receptors within the bladder neck and proximal urethral smooth muscle, which increases outlet resistance. The efferent somatic nerves also stimulate the striated muscular external urethral sphincter. During bladder contraction, there is coordinated opening first of the proximal sphincter, with funneling of the vesical neck and proximal urethra and then of the distal sphincter, at which time voiding will ensue. If the sphincter contracts during bladder contraction, continence will be maintained or voiding will cease if the pressure is greater than that within the urethra or bladder.

Anal Continence
Anal continence is maintained by means of a complex interrelationship between anal and pelvic floor musculature integrated by means of somatic and autonomic nervous control. The smooth muscle of the internal sphincter maintains a tonic contraction, keeping the anal canal closed at rest. The puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter also display some resting tone but contract rapidly to prevent incontinence in response to any sudden increase in intraabdominal pressure.

Defecation
It is likely that defecation is initiated by colonic smooth muscle contractions, which are provoked by waking and after eating. These contractions propel stool from the sigmoid colon into the normally empty rectum and stimulate rectal sensory nerves that produce an urge to defecate. These nerves are also used to determine the nature of rectal content. The sensation of a full rectum and the ability to discriminate gaseous, liquid, and solid content are important components of continence. Interestingly, sensation is retained after rectal excision, suggesting that some sensory receptors reside in the pelvic floor (25). Rectal filling causes reflexive internal sphincter relaxation (the rectoanal inhibitory reflex), rectal contraction, and contraction of the puborectalis muscle and external sphincter, both of which are heavily modulated with conscious control. Stool in the anal canal contacts sensory receptors concentrated at the level of the dentate line and greatly intensifies the urge to defecate, which is resisted by vigorous striated muscle contraction until circumstances for defecation are appropriate. When such circumstances are present, pelvic floor relaxation and increased intraabdominal pressure create a positive pressure gradient from the rectum to the anus to allow evacuation.

Internal sphincter disorders result in passive incontinence (ie, fecal leakage without awareness) (26), whereas external sphincter damage results in urge incontinence (ie, the patient is unable to delay defecation).


    FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Urinary Functional Tests
Urodynamic tests are the most important functional tests in urinary dysfunction. Electromyography (EMG), performed with surface electrodes, or needle EMG may be used to evaluate neurologic dysfunction. Many urodynamic tests have been developed (27,28), and an extensive description is beyond the scope of this article. The simple description provided here is limited to lower urinary tract studies. Unfortunately, the sensitivity and specificity of many of these techniques has not been fully evaluated (29).

Flow rate measurement is an index of the volume voided in a unit time, expressed as millimeters per second. Detrusor underactivity, instability, and outlet obstruction produce abnormal flow patterns. Cystometrography (CMG) is used to measure the relationship between bladder pressure and volume for evaluation of the detrusor functions of compliance and contractility. Urethral pressure profiles are records of intraurethral pressure and can demonstrate pressure equalization between the bladder and urethra at the high-pressure area, which, in the absence of detrusor activity, is considered to be indicative of genuine stress incontinence (ie, urinary incontinence caused by hypermobility of the bladder neck) (29). Detrusor leak-point pressure and abdominal leak-point pressure represent those bladder pressures at which leakage occurs in the absence of increased intraabdominal pressure and at straining, respectively (9). An abnormality suggests an intrinsic sphincter deficiency, and the examination should be performed in conjunction with fluoroscopy to identify potential pitfalls such as the presence of a cystocele (9).

Video urodynamics (VUDO), also called video cystourethrography, is considered to be the best method for investigation of lower urinary function but remains relatively underevaluated (29,30). It is a combination of CMG and voiding cystourethrography that integrates pressure and imaging studies (9). Common indications include failed incontinence surgery and equivocal results after urodynamics. VUDO is a routine technique in many tertiary referral centers. An intravesicular catheter is used to measure bladder pressure during filling with contrast medium, as in CMG, to provide information on bladder capacity and compliance. Simultaneous measurement of intraabdominal pressure is achieved by means of a rectal or vaginal catheter, and subtraction of intraabdominal pressure from intravesicular pressure determines the true detrusor pressure. Urethral closure pressure can be calculated from the difference between urethral and bladder pressures. Voiding flow rate and voided volume are measured by using a transducer placed under a collecting receptacle. Interruption of voiding allows observation of bladder neck closure and urethral "milk-back." Urodynamic measurements are integrated with fluoroscopic findings.

Anorectal Physiology Testing
A variety of techniques are available to test anorectal nerve integrity, conduction, and muscular performance. Few are absolutely diagnostic, and most must be considered together with symptoms, clinical findings, and imaging results. However, these techniques provide valuable complementary information that radiologists working in this field should be aware of. Normal values vary between laboratories.

Manometry
Manometry is used to determine rectal and anal pressures. The systems in use vary in complexity from simple balloons connected to a pressure transducer to perfused multichannel catheters capable of simultaneous measurement of pressures at several sites to ambulatory systems that can record for 24 hours or longer. The pressure recorded will increase when a rectal catheter is withdrawn into the anus and decrease again when it reaches the anal margin, indicating the functional anal canal length. This is usually longer than its anatomic length. A static anal catheter will measure resting anal canal pressure, which is predominantly an internal sphincter function (31).

Resting pressure is reduced in incontinence, owing to abnormality of the internal sphincter. In contrast, squeeze pressure, the incremental increase over resting pressure elicited when the patient is asked to voluntarily contract his or her anus, reflects external sphincter function. This may be reduced when incontinence is due to external sphincter tears, such as those that occur with obstetric injury. A dual sphincter abnormality is suggested when both resting and squeeze pressures are abnormal.

Pudendal Nerve Latency
Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency can be determined on the basis of the time needed for a digitally delivered pudendal nerve stimulus to elicit anal contraction. This is measured by using a disposable glove with a stimulating electrode at the fingertip coupled with a pressure sensor at the base of the glove. The nerve is stimulated near the ischial spine and has both sensory and motor components. Slow conduction is thought to be due predominantly to a stretch-induced injury. This may follow childbirth (32) or chronic straining and is a transient phenomenon even in healthy subjects asked to strain excessively. The clinical relevance of pudendal neuropathy remains unclear, not least because it is a normal feature of aging. The degree of neuropathy and pelvic floor descent should be directly related, although this has not been demonstrated (33). Incontinence is usually attributed to neuropathic sphincter degeneration if the latencies are abnormal and the sphincters intact. Sphincter repair is less successful if there is an underlying neuropathy (34).

EMG Studies
A needle electrode inserted into the external sphincter can determine both its electric activity and quality. Denervation is followed by reinnervation via neighboring healthy axons and is identified at EMG when the recorded action potentials become polyphasic. Prior to endoanal ultrasonography (US), EMG was the only reliable method to preoperatively identify external sphincter tears. No muscle potential would be seen in an area of scarring. Circumferential needle passes around the anus would "map" the extent of the muscle tear or "defect." EMG is painful, and a local anesthetic cannot be used because it interferes with recording. Fortunately, endoanal US is superior for detecting sphincter defects (35).

EMG may be combined with defecography to record external sphincter activity during evacuation. Normally, striated muscle should switch off completely during evacuation. Increased activity suggests anismus. Anismus can be defined as functional evacuatory failure, frequently associated with involuntary contraction, instead of relaxation, of striated pelvic floor musculature during attempted evacuation. Anismus may also be diagnosed manometrically if anal canal pressure increases paradoxically during straining.


    IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
US of the Bladder, Bladder Base, Urethrovesical Junction, and Urethra
Bladder US to determine the residual volume is frequently combined with flow rate estimation. Bladder volume can be determined and calculated by means of various methods that use correction factors for the nonspherical shape of the bladder (36). The residual volume may be increased in outlet obstruction, overflow incontinence (incontinence caused by overdistention of the bladder), and decreased bladder contractility. An increased wall thickness and increased flow at the fundus of the bladder during color Doppler US may indicate detrusor instability (37). US evaluation of urethrovesical junction mobility and bladder base morphology was initially performed by using transabdominal techniques and later by using endorectal, endovaginal, and perineal approaches. These techniques can be used for accurate evaluation of urethrovesical junction mobility and may be comparable to voiding cystourethrography (3840).

A low resting position for the bladder neck and basal descent of 1 cm or more are used to identify hypermobility of the bladder neck in stress incontinence, although there is some overlap with findings in healthy subjects (38,39,41). Rotational descent of the proximal urethra is common in stress urinary incontinence (42). The volume of the striated muscular sphincter (rhabdosphincter), determined with three-dimensional transperineal US, is decreased in genuine stress incontinence (43).

Voiding Cystourethrography
Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is performed primarily to detect a cystocele and evaluate urethrovesical junction mobility. When combined with evacuation proctography, VCUG is termed cystoproctography (4447). Lateral fluoroscopy at rest, during coughing, and during voiding helps differentiate between bladder neck descent or urethrovesical junction hypermobility, defined by bladder base descent below the inferior margin of the pubic symphysis (45), and bladder base descent (cystocele) (Fig 11) (46). A cystocele is frequently overlooked during physical examination, and VCUG or cystoproctography are more accurate. Urethrovesical junction mobility can be related to bone landmarks (pubococcygeal line) or a small radiopaque intraurethral tube (45), with travel of more than 1 cm indicative of hypermobility (46). An open bladder neck and proximal urethra at rest in the absence of detrusor contraction (funneling) may indicate an intrinsic sphincter deficiency (urethral sphincter defect). However, there is a weak relationship between bladder neck funneling at rest and urodynamic parameters of intrinsic sphincter deficiency (46,47).



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 11. Lateral dynamic cystoproctogram in a 62-year-old woman with urinary and fecal incontinence and feelings of incomplete evacuation reveals a cystocele (C) and enterocele (E). Part of the perspex seat is visible as a horizontal bar. A = anterior.

 
The results of VCUG in patients with stress urinary incontinence are influenced by concomitant detrusor instability, which can be identified only with simultaneous urodynamics (47). Considerable intra- and interobserver variation during VCUG has been reported (48). Currently, the main role of VCUG or cystoproctography in cases of stress incontinence is for help in the detection of a concomitant cystocele (Table 1) (45,49,50). Urethrovesical junction mobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency are better evaluated with US and urodynamics, whereas MR imaging may prove to be valuable in the near future. VCUG can help detect other pathologic conditions such as urethral diverticula, vesicoureteric reflux, and fistulas (51).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Demonstration of Compartmental Dysfunction with Different Imaging Modalities
 
MR Imaging of Bladder Neck, Urethra, and Supportive Structures
MR imaging has been applied to anterior pelvic floor imaging because of the intrinsic soft-tissue contrast capability of MR imaging, which permits detailed visualization of the pelvic floor (13,14, 52,53). The high spatial resolution possible with endoluminal coils has further improved anatomic evaluation, and the potential value of this technique in urinary incontinence is currently being assessed (8). T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR sequences can be used to delineate the multiple layers of the urethra and its supportive structures and for the detection of urethral diverticula. Faster MR techniques such as fast gradient-echo and echo-planar imaging allow dynamic imaging (2,5355). In an experimental study (56), urine volume and flow rate were measured by using these techniques during voiding.

Endoanal US
Endoanal US of the anal sphincters is achieved by the simple expedient of replacing the balloon system used for rectal scanning with a hard cone (57). The cylindric nature of the anal structures favors the 360° axial view at right angles to the lumen obtained with a mechanically rotated endoprobe. The cone is filled with degassed water for acoustic coupling and is covered with a lubricated condom. It is introduced into the rectum, aligned in standard orientation with the anterior end uppermost, and then slowly withdrawn down the anal canal. Images are obtained at proximal, middle, and distal levels. Some image asymmetry may be induced if the patient is in a left-lateral position, and it is preferable to examine the patient prone.

The puborectalis muscle and transverse perinea demarcate the proximal portion of the canal. The former blends into the external sphincter in the middle part of the canal, forming a complete ring anteriorly. The internal sphincter is thickest in the middle part of the anal canal and is of uniformly low reflectivity, contrasting sharply against the more heterogeneous subepithelial tissues medially and the longitudinal muscle laterally (Fig 12). The subcutaneous external sphincter, lying below the termination of the internal sphincter, defines the distal portion of the canal. Although the external sphincter, intersphincteric plane, and longitudinal muscle are each relatively heterogeneous, there are characteristic features visible when the latest generation of high-frequency (10-MHz) transducers, which allow these to be distinguished, are used.



View larger version (216K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 12. Transverse endoanal US image obtained with a 10-MHz transducer shows normal sphincter anatomy in a 37-year-old asymptomatic male volunteer. Subepithelial tissues (SE), the internal sphincter (IS), the intersphincteric space and longitudinal muscle (IL), and the external sphincter (ES) are visible.

 
The intact sphincters form the cornerstone of a normal examination because observations of morphology are more variable. External sphincter measurements are subject to considerable interobserver variation, owing to the lack of any precise outer US demarcation and variable acoustic shadowing from the intersphincteric-fat plane interface (58). In contrast, the internal sphincter has clearly defined borders and may be measured with some degree of reproducibility. The internal sphincter thickens with age, measuring approximately 2–3 mm in adults (59).

MR Imaging of the Anal Sphincter
The anal sphincter can be visualized with the body coil alone or with a phased-array or endoluminal coil. Examination with an endoluminal coil results higher spatial resolution but a limited field of view (Fig 5). Examination with an endoanal coil is especially suitable for demonstrating subtle changes within the sphincters, since these lie close to the coil surface. The spatial resolution provided by either a phased-array or a body coil is probably insufficient to aid in the diagnosis of sphincter abnormalities (60). Rigid endoanal coils are preferred for optimal image quality; the diameter of such coils ranges from 7 to 19 mm (21,61). The diameter used is a compromise between imaging of an effective volume and overcompression of adjacent structures. Muscle relaxants may be used to reduce artifacts due to peristalsis (21).

The optimal sequence for evaluating anal sphincter anatomy and abnormalities has not been established. We routinely use a T2-weighted sequence (eg, fast spin-echo) as our basic sequence. The use of T1-weighted sequences, either standard or dynamic with contrast medium, increase cost, and their superiority over other sequences has not been established. The transverse plane, oriented to be at a right angle to the anal canal, is the most relevant surgically and is supplemented by use of longitudinal planes to provide additional information on the extent of disease (62). Similar to the urethra, the smooth muscle of the internal sphincter is relatively hyperintense, and the striated muscle of the external sphincter, puborectal muscle, and levator ani muscle are relatively hypointense on T2-weighted images.

Endoanal MR imaging is well tolerated by nearly all patients and is easily performed (21). Discomfort is limited and comparable to that at endoanal US, although the procedure is more time-consuming (approximately 30 minutes vs 5 minutes) (21).

Colonic Transit Studies
The colon and rectum operate as a single functional unit, so investigation of constipation usually incorporates assessment of colonic transit. A variety of techniques of varying complexity are available, and the level of information needed largely determines which is chosen. Accurate assessment of segmental transit requires scintigraphy to quantify the passage of radioisotope through the colon (63). This is time-consuming and expensive, however, and a simple assessment of whole gut transit by using radiopaque markers is usually all that is necessary, particularly because the relevance of segmental transit disorders remains controversial. A simple method involves acquisition of a single abdominal image 6 days after radiopaque markers have been ingested. This method provides an overall estimation of whole gut transit (64) and has been validated by comparing such images with radionuclide studies (63).

Evacuation Proctography
Evacuation proctography is a simple radiologic technique that involves imaging of rectal voiding of a barium paste enema. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation have been performed for nearly 50 years but became more widely utilized after description of a simplified technique in 1984 (65). Although evacuation proctography is now well established, its use is predominantly confined to specialist centers. Furthermore, the role of this technique remains controversial despite several years of clinical use. The examination is also termed defecography, but the evacuation during the test is not associated with any of the colonic reflexes that accompany normal defecation, so this term may be misleading; rather, it is a test of voluntary rectal evacuation. Constipation—namely, difficult or infrequent rectal evacuation—is the main indication for performance of evacuation proctography. Some authors have stressed a role in incontinence, since an obtuse anorectal angle may help identify patients likely to benefit from postanal repair if the anal sphincters appear normal at US. It has been argued, however, that involuntary loss of barium alone may be sufficient for diagnosis, and many investigators believe that evacuation proctography has a limited role in this scenario.

Technique.—Evacuation proctography is a rapid and simple technique to perform. The rectum may be emptied prior to evacuation proctography, either by administering glycerin suppositories or an enema. These maneuvers have been criticized as unphysiologic, but they do standardize the examination if a fixed volume of contrast medium is given. This allows comparison with normal of evacuation time and completeness, as well as with any change on follow-up studies. The passage of stool during the examination may interfere with the visualization of an intussusception.

In general, a prepared examination is more acceptable to both patients and staff. It is generally accepted that the consistency of the contrast medium should approximate that of feces: a barium suspension mixed with either potato starch or methylcellulose. Commercial preparations are also available. The total volume used is variable; some investigators instill contrast medium until a strong urge to evacuate is provoked, whereas others use an identical volume in all cases, for the reasons given earlier (we use 120 mL).

The paste is injected with a syringe into the rectum, with the patient in the left-lateral position on the fluoroscopy table. The injection is continued during withdrawal of the syringe, to mark the anal canal and verge. The table is moved into the upright position, and a commode is placed on the footrest. The commode must incorporate some filtration to prevent screen flare. Four millimeters of copper provides sufficient attenuation (66). Although many authors stress the importance of the more physiologic and sensitive seated position, the examination can be performed in the left-lateral position if a commode is unavailable or if the patient is incontinent, but static values for pelvic floor position are higher (67). It is essential to perform continuous or rapid recording of rectal evacuation by means either of spot imaging or videofluoroscopy. Although spot imaging provides the best spatial resolution, the ability with videofluoroscopy to replay the entire examination at any speed is an invaluable feature if evacuation is rapid or findings are subtle; this is also possible with some digital systems. Patient dose is also lower than that for standard imaging, although newer digital systems allow substantial reduction in dose. A suitable compromise is to videotape the examination with spot images obtained at key events (68). To reduce dose, imaging should be intermittent if evacuation is prolonged.

Normal study.—Based on the findings in 56 asymptomatic patients, Mahieu et al (65) defined five criteria for a normal evacuation proctographic study: increase in anorectal angulation, obliteration of the puborectal impression, wide anal canal opening, total evacuation of contrast medium, and normal pelvic floor resistance. Several subsequent studies with asymptomatic volunteers have revealed a wide range of normal values, and some overlap with pathologic states (66,69). Nevertheless, there is a consensus regarding normal findings, with broad agreement with the description by Mahieu et al.

The proctographic component of the examination can be considered in three stages: the preevacuation, evacuation, and postevacuation stages. The initial lateral view records the preevacuation anorectal configuration and pelvic floor position. The anorectal angle is thought to be important in maintaining continence and is usually measured between the axis of the anal canal and the posterior rectal wall. Although considerable attention has been devoted to this measurement, there is little evidence that it is important. The junction between the rectal ampulla and the anal canal, the anorectal junction, is easy to appreciate at rest. The pubococcygeal line (Fig 13) is traditionally used to define the level of the pelvic floor but may be difficult to identify with a limited field of view, in which case the inferior surface of the ischial tuberosities are used instead. At rest the anorectal junction should be at or just above this plane, and the anal canal should be closed without leakage. The anorectal angle should be approximately 90°. Some investigators advocate the acquisition of views during a "squeeze" maneuver to evaluate the strength of voluntary pelvic floor musculature, during coughing to stress the continence mechanism, and during straining to assess pelvic floor descent. However, the anorectal angle may increase during these maneuvers in up to 30% of normal subjects, which reflects paradoxical pelvic floor contraction to maintain continence (70).



View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 13a. Dynamic sagittal T1-weighted gradient-echo (79/240; flip angle, 55°) MR images obtained in a 45-year-old woman with pelvic pain. B = bladder, line = pubococcygeal line. (a) Image obtained at rest. (b) Image obtained during maximal straining shows a large cystocele (c).

 


View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 13b. Dynamic sagittal T1-weighted gradient-echo (79/240; flip angle, 55°) MR images obtained in a 45-year-old woman with pelvic pain. B = bladder, line = pubococcygeal line. (a) Image obtained at rest. (b) Image obtained during maximal straining shows a large cystocele (c).

 
Initiation of evacuation should be rapid and involves pelvic floor descent and loss of the puborectal impression, with the anorectal angle becoming more obtuse by approximately 20°, and the anal canal shortening as it opens widely. After evacuation, the canal closes and the anorectal angle and junction return to their original positions. Patients who digitate to aid emptying should be instructed to do so, so that the effect of such maneuvers can be evaluated. It may be relevant to examine the patient in the frontal position, to reveal the coronal configuration of the rectum, because this helps diagnose intussusception (71).

Modifications to the basic technique.—The technique described in the preceding paragraphs will demonstrate the rectal configuration during evacuation and help determine the rate and completeness of evacuation. It is now well recognized that weakness of the middle and anterior pelvic floor often accompanies posterior weakness, so there may be any combination of cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, sigmoidocele, and gynecologic prolapse (1).

An enterocele is defined as prolapse of the small bowel into the rectogenital space; and a sigmoidocele, as prolapse of the sigmoid colon into this space. These are notoriously difficult to detect clinically. In one study (72) with 300 women, enteroceles were revealed with dynamic cystoproctography in 111, of which 93 (84%) were missed at clinical examination. With standard proctographic techniques, these entities will also be missed, and the authors of that study stressed the benefits of an integrated approach to pelvic floor imaging. To achieve this, the most common proctographic modification is oral administration of a barium suspension approximately 1–2 hours before the procedure to opacify the small bowel (68). Alternatively, a vaginal marker in women can help diagnose prolapse by demonstrating rectovaginal separation during or after evacuation. The best choice is probably a barium paste, because a tampon may inhibit prolapse by splinting the vagina (73). However, enteroceles may develop without substantial rectovaginal separation. In addition, liquid barium can be injected before administration of the paste, to opacify the sigmoid colon and identify a sigmoidocele.

Dynamic cystoproctography is essentially evacuation proctography preceded by cystography (70,72,74). Catheterization of the bladder is performed with a 5-F feeding tube (after manual reduction of a prolapse, if necessary). The bladder is then drained and filled with water-soluble contrast medium (45). Lateral views of the bladder are obtained at rest and during maximal straining (45). The bladder should then be emptied completely, because the space in the pelvic cavity is limited; a cystocoele will prevent formation of an enterocoele and vice versa. To overcome the "crowded pelvis," the cystographic phase should also be performed before rectal filling, because rectal distention elevates the bladder base and may mask a cystocele (1).

Some investigators (75,76) have also introduced water-soluble contrast medium directly into the peritoneal cavity to image the pelvic peritoneal recesses during voiding, a practice that is unnecessarily invasive since the advent of dynamic MR imaging. Evacuation proctography has also been combined with simultaneous cystography, EMG, and intrarectal pressure measurement, but the benefits of these combinations remain uncertain.

Dynamic MR Imaging
Although evacuation proctography is rapid and easy to perform, the modifications needed to image other organs are time-consuming and invasive. Also, the musculature of the pelvic floor is not visualized directly, and irradiation of younger patients is an important factor. To overcome these limitations, MR imaging has been applied to pelvic floor dynamics with promising results, although the experimental nature of this procedure must be emphasized. Initial study results were necessarily compromised by slow acquisition times (77), but advances in MR technology now allow multisection imaging during a single straining effort (2,78,79).

The basic examination requires no patient preparation. Vaginal and rectal lumina may be intubated with a soft catheter to facilitate identification. The patient is positioned supine in the magnet, on protective pads, and the pelvis is imaged at rest by using a rapid sequence (eg, fast spoiled gradient-echo acquisition in steady state). Images may be obtained in sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes. The sagittal plane best demonstrates the relationship of the pelvic viscera to each other and the pelvic floor (Fig 13). Imaging is then repeated while the patient performs a maximal straining effort, which has been practiced with the patient beforehand. The resulting images are best viewed as a cine loop to appreciate organ dynamics.

This is an evolving field, and an optimal technique has yet to emerge. Like cystoproctography, some authors catheterize and fill both the bladder and the rectum and encourage the patient to evacuate within the magnet, an examination that has been termed colpocystorectography and undoubtedly provides the most informative study, at the expense of some inconvenience (54). Direct comparison has been made with proctography, and, not surprisingly, there is considerable discrepancy between results (80). This is probably a consequence of the necessary supine position, which can be overcome by those fortunate enough to have access to a vertical open MR system (81). Normal values will have to be determined for this evolving technique, but a study (82) with 50 asymptomatic individuals found some crossover with values assumed to indicate a pathologic condition. The technique is especially valuable for help in the diagnosis of perineal hernia, because both the herniated bowel (usually the rectum) and the defect in the levator plate can be seen.


    PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Urinary Incontinence
Urinary incontinence has been defined as "a condition in which involuntary loss of urine is a social or a hygienic problem and is objectively demonstrable" (83). Urinary incontinence afflicts 13 million Americans—85% of whom are women—at a cost to the economy of $16 billion annually (30,84). The incidence increases with age (85,86) and leads to social withdrawal in approximately 20% of patients (30). Common types of incontinence are urge incontinence, stress incontinence, or a combination of the two (30). Less common causes include urethral diverticula and overflow incontinence, due to pharmacologic or neurologic causes, or outflow obstruction. Physical and/or cognitive impairment is a common cause of incontinence in the geriatric population. A clinical history cannot be used for reliable differentiation among the different causes of urinary incontinence, and further investigation, including urodynamics and imaging, is usually needed. The available equipment and expertise influence the techniques used. For example, access to VUDO is relatively limited. In addition, many techniques are limited by insufficient scientific evidence of their value (29,30).

Urge urinary incontinence.—Patients with symptoms of urge incontinence are unable to prevent urine leakage when they perceive an urge, because of an inability to inhibit bladder contraction (47,87). Urge incontinence may be perceived as stress incontinence if triggered by cough and straining, especially in the absence of normal bladder sensation, and can be caused by detrusor dysfunction in known neurologic disease (detrusor hyperreflexia) or in patients without such disease (detrusor instability). Common causes of detrusor hyperreflexia include spinal cord injury, cerebrovascular accident, Parkinson disease, and multiple sclerosis. Detrusor instability can be caused by irritation, such as that caused by urinary tract infection or radiation-induced cystitis, or no specific cause may be identified (idiopathic urge incontinence). The pathophysiologic characteristics of bladder instability are incompletely understood but may be related to increased sensitivity of the bladder nerve endings. Definitive diagnosis is established with findings from CMG or VUDO, where urine loss due to a nonsuppressible detrusor contraction in the absence of stress incontinence indicates detrusor instability. Ambulatory CMG is possible in patients in whom there is a high index of suspicion but with an apparently stable bladder at CMG or VUDO. Treatment is empiric, relying on behavioral therapy, anticholinergics, or musculotropic relaxants. Surgery, including bladder augmentation or urinary diversion, may be indicated in patients who do not respond to empiric treatment (84).

Stress urinary incontinence.—Stress urinary incontinence is defined as uncontrolled urine leakage during stress or activity such as sneezing, coughing, or exercise. The urodynamic definition is involuntary loss when the intravesical pressure exceeds the maximum urethral closure pressure in the absence of detrusor activity (87). Two types of stress urinary incontinence are identified: genuine stress incontinence, caused by hypermobility of the bladder neck, and the less frequent intrinsic sphincter deficiency, caused by a sphincter defect (88,89).

Bladder neck hypermobility is primarily due to weakened pelvic floor support, which is caused by denervation, musculofascial defects, or both (9094) secondary to aging, obesity, pregnancy, and vaginal delivery (95,96). Weakening results in ineffective transfer of intraabdominal pressure onto the urethra, preventing closure. Some investigators (24) believe this is due to displacement of the urethra below the pelvic floor, whereas others (12,97) suggest that a lax and movable endopelvic fascia underlying the urethra is responsible.

Intrinsic sphincter deficiency can be caused by sympathetic nerve injury, surgical injury (eg, bladder neck suspension), or trauma (93,94,98). Urodynamics are performed to exclude detrusor instability and voiding difficulties. Urethrovesical junction mobility can be evaluated by VCUG, VUDO, or US (Table 1) (9,38,42, 50,99), and the latter is often preferred because radiation is not involved (50). Neither US nor VCUG can provide simultaneous information on detrusor instability, unlike VUDO. Additional urodynamic tests used for differentiation between genuine stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency are urethral pressure profiles, detrusor leak-point pressure measurement, and abdominal leak-point pressure measurement (100).

Therapy for stress urinary incontinence may be conservative (physiotherapy, drugs, or mechanical devices) or surgical. More than 150 surgical procedures have been developed for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Suspension techniques are based on the concept that urethral descent influences urethral closure (24), whereas sling operations and periurethral bulking agents are used for intrinsic sphincter deficiency, with preference for a sling procedure in women with coexisting hypermobility (84). Artificial sphincters are used if intrinsic sphincter deficiency is unresponsive to other treatments. Despite all efforts, the long-term outcome is suboptimal, which suggests that current diagnostic work-up and/or surgical techniques should be reconsidered (12,101103). US may be useful for postoperative evaluation (39). Periurethral bulking agents may be visualized by using US and MR imaging, but the imaging appearances cannot predict outcome (104,105).

Future role of imaging in stress urinary incontinence.—The relatively disappointing surgical results together with other factors, such as the emerging new concepts of pathologic mechanisms, have increased the need for more structural information (97). Detailed demonstration of the pelvic floor muscles, urethra, and supporting structures was not possible prior to the development of MR imaging. MR imaging, especially endoluminal imaging, provides a level of detail otherwise unobtainable (8,13,14,52,53). Similar information is obtained, to a more limited extent, with endoluminal US performed with high-frequency transducers. The authors of some encouraging initial reports (43,106,107) have described the use of MR imaging and US for identification of urinary sphincter volume and defects. High-resolution MR imaging can be used to identify thinning of the levator ani muscle and associated paravaginal defects, and dynamic MR imaging can be used to determine urethrovesicular and pelvic floor mobility (53,55,56). At present, these techniques are predominantly performed at specialized centers, with research aimed at further defining the role of the techniques.

Miscellaneous causes of urinary incontinence.—Bladder US can reveal a substantial postvoiding residual in cases of overflow incontinence, which may be secondary to outflow obstruction or autonomic (eg, diabetic) neuropathy. A urethral diverticulum, thought to be secondary to rupture of obstructed periurethral glands after inflammation (108), fills during voiding and empties intermittently, causing dribbling incontinence. A diagnosis established on the basis of imaging findings is most accurate (109). VCUG (51) or double-balloon urethrography can be used to identify contrast medium–filled diverticula only, which is not a prerequisite for US (transvaginal, transperineal) or MR imaging (109). Imaging can also help identify a urinary fistula or ectopic ureter. Most cases of outflow obstruction will be due to prostatic hypertrophy, which is associated with detrusor instability (110).

Constipation
Constipation is the most common reason to request evacuation proctography, although pelvic pain, prolapse (rectal or other), and anal incontinence may be other indications. Chronic constipation is common, accounting for an estimated 2.5 million physician visits per year in the United States (111) and regularly affecting up to 20% of the population. Constipation also has considerable economic impact: In 1987, it was estimated that cathartics were prescribed for 3 million people yearly in the United States, with over $200 million spent on laxatives (112). A study (113) with severely constipated patients found that three-fourths had taken time off work, and one-fifth lost their job.

Constipation is a symptom, not a clinical sign, and is particularly subjective, meaning different things to different people. When asked to define constipation, there is considerable individual variation in response (112). Any adequate definition must include concepts of both infrequent defecation and difficult evacuation. Infrequent stools are usually defined as less than three per week, and straining at stool is considered to be abnormal if it occurs for more than 25% of the time spent in the lavatory. Although constipation is common among uncomplaining subjects, patients presenting to referral centers tend to have worse symptoms and, therefore, real cause for complaint. Constipation is three times more frequent in women, who comprise practically all those with severe symptoms. Physicians often accept patients’ claims that they are constipated, but patients are inaccurate when asked about their bowel frequency, and some even deny the passage of stool when this has occurred. In a study (114) with 224 patients referred because of severe constipation, the authors documented normal examination results in 49, with daily stools in 24. Therefore, objective criteria for constipation, such as slow colonic transit, may be preferable to subjective criteria for diagnosis.

It is clearly inappropriate to examine all patients presenting with constipation, even if this were economically feasible. The physician’s role is to determine symptom severity to select those in whom further investigation is appropriate. It should be remembered that the primary aim of investigation is to guide therapy by sorting patients into treatment-defined groups. At present, the treatment options for severe constipation are limited, and investigation may achieve little other than to confirm symptom severity. It must be appreciated that this is not a field where there is any final histologic arbiter. Functional disorders are difficult to analyze. Interpretation must be cautious and referred to developments in related fields of diagnosis.

The causes of constipation are legion, and most will respond to simple dietary measures once certain underlying causes have been excluded. In particular, an obstructive lesion must be ruled out in the older patient with recent-onset constipation, especially if there are symptoms such as rectal bleeding. Severe constipation in younger patients raises the possibility of Hirschsprung disease or megarectum, both of which may be diagnosed with a water-soluble enema study; dilatation extending to the pelvic floor suggests megarectum, whereas a short segment is seen in Hirschsprung disease (115).

The majority of patients who present with severe constipation have no readily identifiable cause, and it seems reasonable to classify these on the basis of functional disturbance. When the predominant feature is slow colonic transit, the term "idiopathic slow-transit constipation" is used (113). However, others may complain primarily of difficult defecation, with prolonged and unsuccessful straining: "outlet obstruction" or "obstructed defecation." Classification into cases of colonic inertia and those of rectal outlet obstruction is simplistic, especially since there is considerable overlap between the two, but is convenient clinically. For this reason, transit studies and evacuation proctography are frequently requested together.

Proctographic abnormalities can generally be divided into structural and functional groups, which may occur in isolation or combination, and have varying clinical relevance.

Rectocele
Rectocele is diagnosed when an anterior rectal wall bulge occurs during evacuation (Fig 14). Most are not apparent at rest. Rectoceles are common in women because the rectovaginal septum is relatively weak, and rectoceles are likely to be a normal variant (116). However, the association between a large rectocele and difficult evacuation is well recognized (117), and proctography is frequently requested for diagnosis. The relevance of a rectocele to symptoms may be determined by the need for vaginal digitation to empty the rectum (118) and retention of contrast medium within it. A rectocele also may be posterior, where it is more correctly termed a posterior perineal hernia because the defect occurs laterally, through the levator plate rather than the midline. Proctography may be used postoperatively to determine technical success, especially if the subject remains symptomatic (119).



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14. Lateral evacuation proctogram in a 52-year-old woman who complained of incomplete evacuation shows a large anterior rectocele (R). Part of the acrylic plastic seat is visible as a horizontal bar.

 
Prolapse
A rectal prolapse may be external or internal. A circumferential prolapse that remains confined to the rectum and anal canal is termed an intussusception and may be limited to the mucosa or involve the full thickness of the rectal wall (Fig 15). An intussusception that remains within the rectum is termed an intrarectal intussusception; such an intussusception becomes intraanal if its apex penetrates the anal canal. A prolapse may also be confined to the anterior rectal wall, in which case it is termed an anterior mucosal prolapse. Complete rectal prolapse occurs when the entire thickness of the rectal wall is extruded through the anal canal.



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 15. Lateral evacuation proctogram in a 48-year-old woman who complained of difficult rectal evacuation reveals a high-grade intrarectal intussusception (curved arrows). Part of the acrylic plastic seat is visible as a horizontal bar.

 
An intussusception may be diagnosed during either lateral or frontal proctography, and a spectrum of findings exists, from the minor degrees of prolapse found in asymptomatic individuals to the more impressive prolapse frequently associated with symptoms. Intussusception has been graded by using a seven-point scale (116), although it is more convenient to categorize prolapse into high or low grades that reflect the perceived severity. Classification is based on rectal appearance at the end of evacuation. Generally, low-grade intussusception is defined as rectal wall infolding of less than 3 mm in thickness and that does not enter the anal canal. The full thickness of the rectal wall is assumed to be involved if the prolapsed folds are thicker than 3 mm. Any prolapse of this thickness or that penetrates the anal canal or appears to impede evacuation can be considered a high-grade intussusception.

An enterocele is present if small bowel enters the rectogenital space, passing below the proximal one-third of the vagina in women. This usually occurs at the end of evacuation as a consequence of increased intraabdominal pressure and because a filled rectum or bladder frequently pushes small bowel out of the pelvis (70). Similarly, a sigmoidocele is present if colon enters this space. A cystocele occurs if the bladder base descends below the inferior border of the pubic symphysis (Figs 11, 13) (70).

Pelvic Floor Descent
Parks et al (120) described a syndrome characterized by excessive pelvic floor descent, which was considered to be secondary to pudendal neuropathy. In patients with this condition, the pelvic muscles lose their tone, so that the entire pelvic floor descends excessively and balloons during straining; the syndrome is often with associated rectocele and intussusception. It is generally accepted that proctography provides the most accurate estimate of pelvic floor descent, because with clinical methods a perineometer is used to measure movement of the anal verge during maximum straining and not to the point of opening of the anal canal. Excessive pelvic floor descent can be defined as a resting anorectal junction position of 3.0 cm or more below the ischial tuberosities or as anorectal junction descent of more than 3.5 cm during evacuation.

It is unlikely that this constitutes an isolated syndrome. Although lack of muscular support after childbirth is clearly responsible in some cases, many other patients describe a long history of straining at defecation, which raises the possibility that descent follows chronically increased intrarectal pressure. Because of this, an underlying functional disorder of evacuation should always be considered when excessive pelvic floor descent is encountered.

Functional Abnormality
Some constipated patients find it difficult to empty the rectum irrespective of the volume or consistency of the contents of the rectum, a phenomenon that may be disclosed clinically with inability to evacuate a rectal balloon (121). Evacuation failure may be associated with involuntary contraction of striated pelvic floor musculature, a syndrome termed anismus (122) and also known as inappropriate or paradoxical contraction of the puborectalis muscle. The relevance of this finding is uncertain, because it can be demonstrated in both healthy and incontinent patients (123) and may vanish if recordings had been performed outside the hospital environment (124). The etiology of this condition also is unclear: It may be a learned inappropriate response and related to sexual abuse in some individuals (125). Nevertheless, the clear association with difficult rectal evacuation and the success of biofeedback therapy in a substantial proportion of patients suggests that diagnosis is worthwhile (126).

The pelvic and rectoanal coordination required for defecation is complex and involves both conscious and unconscious pathways. It is probably an oversimplification to suggest that anismus is merely confined to a single muscle group; it is likely that the entire pelvic floor is involved, and the condition may be better termed pelvic floor incoordination (127). For example, some patients may merely fail to generate adequate intrarectal pressure (128), and others may also have a functional urinary obstruction.

Because puborectal dysfunction has been the main focus of the syndrome, a proctographic diagnosis of anismus has conventionally been determined on the basis of visualization of a prominent puborectal impression during voiding coupled with failure of the anorectal angle to open; both are frequently cited signs of anismus. However, there is little evidence that these findings are specific, and simultaneous proctography and puborectal electromyography reveal no correlation between muscular activity and anorectal junction configuration. Instead, it is more appropriate to base a proctographic diagnosis on evacuation failure. Healthy subjects void rapidly and completely, in contrast to patients with anismus, whose evacuation is prolonged and incomplete, a difference that can be quantified proctographically (127). The authors of a study (129) with 24 patients in whom a diagnosis of anismus had been established with multiple clinical and physiologic criteria found that puborectal morphology and anorectal angle did not differ from those in asymptomatic control subjects but that prolonged and incomplete contrast medium voiding during evacuation proctography was highly specific. The time taken to initiate anal canal opening and the rate of evacuation are more relevant than the final percentage of contrast medium evacuated, because most patients will eventually fully empty their rectum if given enough time to do so.

Clinical Relevance
Although proctography has been widely practiced for several years, debate concerning its clinical relevance continues. Much of this derives from the excessive attention that has been devoted to the detailed and complex anatomic measurements that are possible during the procedure. Any rectal configuration occurring during emptying other than that of a symmetrically collapsing tube has been considered abnormal. However, a variety of rectal configurations may be present in asymptomatic patients. Shorvon and co-workers (116) demonstrated low-grade intussusception in 80% of men and 81% of women, which clearly suggests that the finding was of little relevance. In contrast, high-grade intussusception is likely to be abnormal; there is a clear association with difficult evacuation and the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (a combination of difficult evacuation, rectal prolapse, and ulceration, characterized by specific histologic changes), and surgical repair can ameliorate symptoms (130). However, this does not mean that it is the primary cause of difficult evacuation. In some studies (131,132) with patients whose symptoms were attributed to intussusception, investigators have found that these may persist after surgical repair, which suggests that intussusception is merely a secondary phenomenon. It is easy to imagine how this may occur if an underlying functional disorder results in chronic straining. Similarly, chronic straining may engender rectoceles and enteroceles, both of which are found in association with functional disorders; in a study (133) with 41 patients with difficult evacuation ascribed to rectocele, anismus was found in 29 (71%). Furthermore, in a proctographic study (134) with 58 constipated patients, the only significant difference between patients and control subjects was prolongation of evacuation time and failure to fully empty the rectum, which clearly suggest that functional measurements of emptying are more important than changes in rectal configuration.

There are also perceptual differences between patients. Some have heightened rectal awareness, which may lead to sensations of incomplete evacuation ignored by others. Other patients complain of sensations of rectal fullness despite proctographic evidence that the rectum is empty. For example, it is believed that enteroceles compress the rectum, which prevents evacuation; this opinion is derived from proctographic appearances that suggest rectal blockade, but formal studies of rectal evacuation in these subjects are usually normal (135). This may be because the stretch receptors responsible for sensations of rectal distension lie within the surrounding musculature, allowing them to be triggered by the enterocele sac. This raises the possibility that symptoms are due to the sac itself rather than any secondary effect on rectal emptying.

The importance of excessive pelvic floor descent also is uncertain. Some studies show differences between constipated patients and control subjects, whereas others show no difference between incontinent and constipated patients. It is interesting that although chronic straining is believed to cause pudendal neuropathy, there is no correlation between neuropathy and the degree of descent as assessed with proctography (136).

The main value of proctography is related to the ability to aid in simultaneous diagnosis of structural and functional abnormalities and determine which abnormality is more likely to be relevant (Table 1) (115). Problems with interpretation most often occur when anatomic findings are given undue emphasis, which perhaps allows an underlying functional disorder of defecation to remain unrecognized (137). In general, impaired evacuation suggests that a functional abnormality is the primary cause of symptoms. Given this scenario, any abnormalities of rectal configuration may merely be secondary manifestations, and care should be taken not to operate on the basis of structural proctographic abnormalities alone. For example, the authors of a study (138) with patients undergoing rectopexy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome found that persistent postoperative symptoms were related to impaired evacuation seen at preoperative proctographic rather than to the presence of any prolapse. This approach will direct patients toward biofeedback therapy rather than surgery, because the latter is unlikely to treat the underlying disorder. Furthermore, biofeedback is less invasive, cheaper, and does not preclude a surgical option in the future.

It has been argued that proctography should be the initial test performed in all patients with severe constipation, including those with slow colonic transit, because this may be a secondary physiologic response to an inability to evacuate (139). This approach ensures that treatment aimed at improving rectal evacuation, such as biofeedback, precedes all other measures (140).

Much of the uncertainty related to the benefits or otherwise of proctography has been generated because of studies where the possibilities of functional diagnoses have been ignored, or where benefit has been assessed in terms of outcome, an approach that inevitably includes assessment of any treatment (141,142). Whether a particular imaging technique can assist clinical understanding and management is perhaps the most relevant question in its assessment (143). When this has been applied to investigations of evacuation proctography, the test has method has been overwhelmingly found to be valuable: In a study (144) of 50 consecutive referrals, the authors found that proctography significantly increased diagnostic confidence, with over 90% of clinicians reporting the test to be useful. To our knowledge, there is no prospective controlled study in which patient outcome both with and without evacuation proctography has been evaluated.

Anal Incontinence
Anal incontinence is common, especially in women, and its prevalence increases with age; 2% of the general population older than 45 years have anal incontinence, and the prevalence increases to 7% in those over the age of 65 years. In retirement homes or hospitals, approximately one-third of individuals have anal incontinence. The prevalence is likely higher because of underreporting. Anal incontinence has a considerable economic impact. In a 1988 study (145), it was estimated that more than $400 million was spent annually on incontinence appliances in the United States alone, and anal incontinence was found to be the second most common cause for placement in a nursing home. Patients generally present with either passive incontinence (anal leakage without awareness) or urge incontinence (inability to defer defecation). The former suggests internal sphincter pathology or impacted stool, whereas the latter most likely indicates external sphincter damage (146). Several grading systems for anal incontinence have been developed, and the simple Parks system is commonly used: Grade 1 is continent, grade 2 is incontinent for flatus, grade 3 is incontinent for liquid stool, and grade 4 is incontinent for solid stool.

Causes of anal incontinence.—Childbirth is the most common cause of anal incontinence and is due either directly to anal sphincter laceration or indirectly to damage to sphincter innervation. Until the advent of endoanal US, it was assumed that neuropathy was the primary cause of obstetric-related incontinence, because impaired pudendal nerve conduction can be demonstrated after vaginal delivery, presumably due to stretch-induced injury (147150). Anal sphincter laceration was thought to be a relatively rare event because it could be identified clinically in only one of 200 vaginal deliveries (151). However, endoanal US revealed that anal sphincter tears were far more common than was initially assumed. In an early study (152) in women with a diagnosis of neurogenic fecal incontinence, it was revealed that over one-third (four of 11 patients) had also sustained unsuspected anal sphincter tears, and in a further study (153) with 62 women whose incontinence was related to childbirth, external sphincter tears were found in 56 (90%). In a prospective study (22) with 202 nonselected consecutive women examined with endoanal US before and after vaginal delivery, anal sphincter tears were revealed in 28 of 79 (35%) of primiparous subjects and in 21 of 48 (44%) of multiparous subjects. Furthermore, endoanal US evidence of sphincter laceration was associated with symptoms of anal incontinence 6 weeks after delivery, and with evidence of physiologic impairment—namely, reduced anal resting and squeeze pressures. No primiparous woman had a defect before childbirth, and no subject who underwent cesarean delivery developed a new defect, which confirmed that sphincter injury was related to vaginal delivery, especially forceps extraction. Moreover, the study results confirmed that the majority of sphincter tears are overlooked at clinical examination. Incontinence may occur immediately after delivery if trauma is sufficient, but many women present later, presumably because the cumulative effects of multiple deliveries, progressive neuropathy, aging, and menopause overcome their compensation mechanisms. Many are also too embarrassed to complain, or they or their physicians believe that the condition is incurable.

Iatrogenic damage is a relatively common cause of anal incontinence. Sphincter division is unavoidable during fistulectomy and fistulotomy, both associated with subsequent incontinence, but endoanal US has revealed unintentional sphincter trauma following hemorrhoidectomy (154) and manual disimpaction (155). Similarly, in a study (156) with patients undergoing lateral sphincterotomy because of an anal fissure, the incision was often found to be far more extensive than intended, which caused subsequent incontinence. Accidental perineal injury and unwanted anal penetration are other traumatic causes of sphincter damage revealed with endoanal US or endoanal MR imaging (157).

Many incontinent patients will have intact sphincters, however, and, in most cases, their symptoms will be due to idiopathic neuropathy (158). Rarer causes of incontinence with intact sphincters include fibrosis, such as occurs in scleroderma. Anal impaction may also cause overflow incontinence.

Imaging in Patients with Anal Incontinence
Imaging has assumed a central role in the management of anal incontinence because it helps identify those patients with a sphincter tear, which allows selection of individuals likely to benefit from surgery to restore the integrity of the sphincter ring. Physical examination cannot be used for reliable detection of anal sphincter defects (159,160), and although anal canal pressures can help determine whether sphincter function is normal, they cannot indicate whether this is due to loss of sphincter integrity or neuropathy.

Endoanal US.—Discontinuity of the sphincters indicates a tear (Fig 16). The accuracy of endoanal US for the diagnosis of sphincter disruption has been validated both histologically (37) and intraoperatively and approaches 95% (152,161,162). An endoanal US study (161) with 44 patients found that all 23 external sphincter defects and 21 of 22 internal sphincter defects were confirmed surgically. Endoanal US is more accurate than electromyography (152,163165). Inter- and intraobserver agreement are also very good, with a {kappa} statistic of 0.8 for sphincter disruption (58).



View larger version (218K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 16. Transverse endoanal US image obtained with a 10-MHz transducer in a 30-year-old woman who complained of urge incontinence after vaginal delivery 1 year previously shows an anterior (A) internal sphincter (IS) defect (solid arrows) and an external sphincter defect (open arrows).

 
Internal sphincter thickness increases with age (153) but is abnormally thinned in patients with idiopathic degeneration (158) and abnormally thick in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (166). As a broad generalization, we consider any internal sphincter thickness measurement in adults to be abnormal if it is less than 2 mm or more than 4 mm, regardless of patient age. The role of external sphincter measurement is less defined, with conflicting results from various studies (167), presumably because the borders of this muscle are more difficult to define at US. In a study (167) with 29 patients and 26 healthy volunteers, the ratio between the thickness of the external and internal sphincters was found to be significantly reduced in neurogenic incontinence.

Three-dimensional endoanal US has recently been described (168) and promises to increase our understanding of anal sphincter dysfunction. It is interesting to note that there are considerable turf battles related to endoanal US: In the United States, endoanal US is usually performed by colorectal surgeons or gastroenterologists, whereas in the United Kingdom approximately half such examinations are practiced by radiologists. The operator’s experience is the most relevant factor, irrespective of specialty.

Endoanal MR imaging.—Endoanal MR imaging is a recent development that may help better delineate external sphincter boundaries (60). The high intrinsic contrast resolution of endoanal MR imaging can accurately delineate the sphincter complex, and the multiplanar capabilities demonstrate the sphincter in surgically relevant planes. Endoanal MR imaging can accurately demonstrate lesions of both the external and the internal sphincter (169, 170) (Fig 17). The authors of a retrospective surgical study (157) with 22 patients with sphincter defects compared anal endosonography and endoanal MR imaging and found MR imaging to be the most accurate method for detection. External sphincter defects were detected with US and endoanal MR imaging in 16 (73%) and 20 (91%) patients, respectively, and internal sphincter defects were detected in 15 (68%) and 17 (77%) patients, respectively. The results of a prospective study (171) with 52 consecutive patients with fecal incontinence suggested that endoanal US and endoanal MR imaging are comparable for detection of external sphincter defects and that endoanal US is superior for detection of internal sphincter defects. The patient population characteristics differed between these two studies, and, in the latter study, the comparison of imaging findings was made in a consensus between the gastroenterologist and the surgeon and was not based on results at surgery.



View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 17. Transverse T2-weighted gradient-echo (24/14; flip angle, 60°) MR image obtained with an endoanal coil in a 63-year-old woman with fecal incontinence demonstrates right anterior defect of the external anal sphincter (ES, arrows) and scar tissue (S) anteriorly on the left side. Thinning of the internal sphincter (IS) anteriorly (arrowheads) can also be seen.

 
The exquisite delineation of the external sphincter, especially its peripheral edge and internal structure, at endoanal MR imaging facilitates evaluation of external sphincter atrophy and has been validated both surgically and histologically (20,157,170,172,173). External sphincter atrophy is characterized by generalized sphincter thinning and fatty replacement (Fig 18). In a study with histologic confirmation (173), endoanal MR imaging was shown to be accurate (14 of 15 [93%]) for determination of the presence of external sphincter atrophy. In a comparative study (172) of endoanal US and endoanal MR imaging in 20 women with fecal incontinence due to obstetric trauma, external sphincter atrophy was not identified at US but was present at endoanal MR imaging in eight women. Accurate assessment of atrophy can be accomplished at a workstation by means of visual evaluation of the muscle mass and measurement of the area of the remaining muscle (172). The finding most likely has clinical relevance, especially because it is predictive of a poor outcome following sphincter repair (172); this finding is in accord with those from physiologic studies (174176). The combination of accurate detection of both sphincter defects and external sphincter atrophy make endoanal MR imaging a potentially powerful diagnostic tool in anal incontinence, and further studies to fully evaluate its role are indicated.



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 18. Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (2,500/100) MR image obtained with an endoanal coil in 45-year-old woman with fecal incontinence shows atrophy of the external sphincter (ES). Compare the thickness and signal intensity of the external sphincter with those of the nonatrophied puborectal muscle (PR) and levator ani muscle (LA) and to a normal external sphincter (see Fig 5). The external sphincter muscle is partly replaced by fat.

 
In the current work-up, local expertise is the major factor for decisions about the preferred imaging technique. In specific situations, the strength or weakness of either technique (US or MR imaging) may influence the decision, making endoanal US preferable in cases of localized internal sphincter disorders (eg, idiopathic internal anal sphincter degeneration), and endoanal MR imaging may be preferable in cases of localized external sphincter disorders (eg, external sphincter atrophy) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Demonstration of Sphincter Disorders: Endoanal US versus Endoanal MR Imaging
 
Management of Anal Incontinence
Where available, endoanal imaging is the most valuable tool in the evaluation of anal incontinence (Table 2), and manometric studies assume a secondary role for help in determining the functional contribution of any sphincter defects found (177). Pudendal nerve latency measurements are performed for the detection of concomitant neuropathy (178,179). Minor degrees of anal incontinence can often be satisfactorily managed with dietary manipulation (fiber, bulking agents), pharmacologic treatment (motility-alternating agents), or physical therapy and biofeedback. Patients who have an external sphincter tear undergo surgical repair. These tears can be closed with apposition, but improved results are obtained if the sphincter ends are overlapped, a technique that improves continence in up to 80% of cases (cumulative data from 21 studies including 772 patients) (180). Postanal repair (plication of external sphincter and puborectal muscle) has been advocated for idiopathic or neurogenic incontinence, but its value remains debatable (181,182). If formal sphincter repair is unsuccessful, endoanal US may reveal a residual defect (154,183,184), and patients may undergo a second or even third repair with symptomatic benefit (185). Resistant cases will require more advanced techniques. These include muscle transposition, with or without electric stimulation (180,186), sacral nerve stimulation, or surgical implantation of an artificial anal sphincter (187).


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Current research on pelvic floor imaging is based on an integrated approach to pelvic floor dysfunction, with multiplanar imaging breaking down artificial anatomic compartmentalization. Demand for functional pelvic floor imaging is likely to increase, driven by greater physician and patient awareness of the possibilities of both imaging and treatment. Imaging is already playing a major role in patient selection for treatment, and, on a research basis, has greatly influenced the nature of that treatment. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor is a rapidly developing field, and further advances can be expected. Endoanal MR imaging is providing new insights into the pathogenesis of anal incontinence. The advances in imaging have made the management of functional pelvic floor disorders a multidisciplinary effort, with the radiologist placed right at the center.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors acknowledge J. L. H. R. Bosch, MD, PhD, for reading parts of the manuscript. Thanks are due to Andries W. Zwamborn for the line drawings.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: CMG = cystometrography, EMG = electromyography, VCUG = voiding cystourethrography, VUDO = video urodynamics


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANATOMY
 PHYSIOLOGY
 FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
 IMAGING TECHNIQUES
 PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT. Dynamic cystoproctography of female pelvic floor defects and their interrelationships. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:769-774.[Free Full Text]
  2. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, Watson S, Phillips RKS, Armstrong P. Patterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 203:77-81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K, Hale DS, Benson JT. Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:439-444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Strohbehn K. Normal pelvic floor anatomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25:683-696.[Medline]
  5. Strohbehn K, Ellis JH, Strohbehn JA, DeLancey JOL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator ani with anatomic correlation. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87:277-285.[Medline]
  6. Norton PA. Pelvic floor disorders: the role of fascia and ligaments. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993; 126:926-573.
  7. Critchley HOD, Dixon JS, Gosling JA. Comparative study of the periurethral and perianal parts of the human levator ani muscle. Urol Int 1980; 35:226-232.[Medline]
  8. Tan IL, Stoker J, Zwamborn AW, Entius KAC, Calame JJ, Laméris JS. Female pelvic floor: endovaginal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology 1998; 206:777-783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dupont MC, Albo ME, Raz S. Diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence: an overview. Urol Clin North Am 1996; 23:407-415.[Medline]
  10. Walters MD. Mechanisms of continence and voiding, with International Continence Society classification of dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1989; 16:773-785.[Medline]
  11. Juenemann KP, Lue TF, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA. Clinical significance of sacral and pudendal nerve anatomy. J Urol 1988; 139:74-80.[Medline]
  12. DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1713-1723.[Medline]
  13. Klutke C, Golomb J, Barbaric Z, Raz S. The anatomy of stress incontinence: magnetic resonance imaging of the female bladder neck and urethra. J Urol 1990; 143:563-566.[Medline]
  14. Kirschner-Hermanns R, Wein B, Niehaus S, Schaefer W, Jakse G. The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor to the understanding of urinary incontinence. Br J Urol 1993; 72:715-718.[Medline]
  15. Mostwin JL. Current concepts of female pelvic anatomy and physiology. Urol Clin North Am 1991; 18:175-195.
  16. DeLancey JO, Starr RA. Histology of the connection between the vagina and levator ani muscles: implications for urinary tract function. J Reprod Med 1990; 35:765-771.[Medline]
  17. Weber AM, Walters MD. Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89:311-318.[Medline]
  18. DeLancey JO. Structural aspects of the extrinsic continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72:296-301.[Medline]
  19. Gibbons CP, Read NW, Trowbridge EA. Anal cushions (letter). Lancet 1986; 2:42.
  20. Hussain SM, Stoker J, Laméris JS. Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology 1995; 197:671-677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Stoker J, Rociu E, Zwamborn AW, Schouten WR, Laméris JS. Endoluminal MR imaging of the rectum and anus: technique, applications, and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 1999; 19:383-398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1905-1911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Karoui S, Savoye-Collet C, Koning E, Leroi AM, Denis P. Prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:389-392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Enhorning G. Simultaneous recording of the intravesical and intraurethral pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1961; 276(suppl):1-69.
  25. Lane RH, Parks AG. Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1977; 64:596-599.[Medline]
  26. Engel AG, Kamm MA. Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995; 10:152-155.[Medline]
  27. Saxton HM. Urodynamics: the appropriate modality for the investigation of frequency, urgency, incontinence, and voiding difficulties. Radiology 1990; 175:307-316.[Free Full Text]
  28. Karram MM. Urodynamics. In: Benson JT, eds. Female pelvic floor disorders: investigation and management. New York, NY: Norton, 1992; 100-118.
  29. McGuire EJ, Cespedes RD, Cross CA, O’Connell HE. Videourodynamic studies. Urol Clin North Am 1996; 23:309-321.[Medline]
  30. Payne CK. Epidemiology, pathophysiology and evaluation of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder. Urology 1998; 51(2A suppl):3-10.
  31. Frenckner B, von Euler C. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut 1975; 16:482-489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Snooks SJ, Setchell M, Swash M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 1984; 2:546-550.[Medline]
  33. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD, Ehrenpreis ED, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Does perineal descent correlate with pudendal neuropathy?. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:475-483.[Medline]
  34. Gilliand R, Altomare DF, Moreira H, Oliveira L, Gilliand J, Wexner SD. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:1516-1522.[Medline]
  35. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 1994; 81:463-465.[Medline]
  36. Hartnell CG, Kiely EA, Williams G, Gibson RN. Real-time ultrasound measurement of bladder volume: a comparative study of three methods. Br J Radiol 1987; 60:1063-1065.[Medline]
  37. Khullar V, Salvatore S, Cardozo LD, Hill S, Kelleher CJ. Ultrasound bladder wall measurement: a non-invasive sensitive screening test for detrusor instability. Neurourol Urodynam 1994; 13:461- 462.
  38. Quinn MJ, Beynon J, McC Mortensen, Smith PJB. Transvaginal endosonography: a new method to study the anatomy of the lower urinary tract in urinary stress incontinence. Br J Urol 1988; 62:414-418.[Medline]
  39. Kil PJM, Hoekstra JW, van der Weijden APM, Smans AJ, Theeuwes AGM, Schreinemachers LMH. Transvaginal ultrasonography and urodynamic evaluation after suspension operations: comparison among the Gittes, Stamey and Burch suspensions. J Urol 1991; 146:132-136.[Medline]
  40. Mouritsen L, Strandberg C. Vaginal ultrasonography versus colpo-cysto-urethrography in the evaluation of female urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73:338-342.[Medline]
  41. Hol M, van Bolhuis C, Vierhout ME. Vaginal ultrasound studies of bladder neck mobility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102:47-53.[Medline]
  42. Sanders R, Genadry R, Yang A, Mostwin J. Imaging the female urethra with ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 1994; 12:167-183.
  43. Khullar V, Abbott D, Cardozo LD, Kelleher CJ, Salvatore S, Bourne TH. Perineal ultrasound measurement of the urethral sphincter in women with urinary incontinence: an aid to diagnosis? (abstr). Br J Radiol 1994; 67:713.
  44. Halligan S, Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Dynamic cystoproctography and physiological testing in women with urinary stress incontinence and urogenital prolapse. Clin Radiol 1996; 51:785-790.[Medline]
  45. Maglinte DDT, Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Benson JT. Dynamic cystoproctography: a unifying diagnostic approach to pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:759-767.[Free Full Text]
  46. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale D, Benson JT. Voiding cystourethrography in female stress incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:1065-1066.[Medline]
  47. Pelsang RE, Bonney WW. Voiding cystourethrography in female stress incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:561-565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Fischer-Rasmussen W, Hansen RI, Stage P. Predictive value of diagnostic tests in the evaluation of female urinary stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65:291-295.[Medline]
  49. Hock D, Lombard R, Jeheas C, et al. Colpocystography. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:1015-1021.[Medline]
  50. Mouritsen L. Techniques for imaging bladder support. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76(suppl 166):48-49.
  51. Leach GE, Bavendam TG. Female urethral diverticula. Urology 1987; 30:407-415.[Medline]
  52. Strohbehn K, Quint LE, Prince MR, Wojno KJ, DeLancey JOL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female urethra: a direct histologic comparison. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88:750-756.[Medline]
  53. Fielding JR, Versi E, Mulkern RV, Lerner MH, Griffiths DJ, Jolesz FA. MR imaging of the female pelvis in the supine and upright position. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:961-963.[Medline]
  54. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic floor descent. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:1309-1317.[Medline]
  55. Goodrich MA, Webb MJ, King BF, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor relaxation: dynamic analysis and evaluation of patients before and after surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:883-891.[Medline]
  56. Simmons A, Williams SCR, Craggs M, et al. Dynamic multi-slice EPI of the urinary bladder during voiding (abstr). Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the European Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1995; 1488.
  57. Law PJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 1989; 14:349-353.[Medline]
  58. Gold DG, Halligan S, Kmiot W, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: inter- and intra-observer agreement. Br J Surg 1999; 86:371-375.[Medline]
  59. Burnett SJ, Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991; 6:2-4.[Medline]
  60. Stoker J, Rociu E. Endoluminal MR imaging of anorectal diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:631-634.[Medline]
  61. deSouza NM, Puni R, Zbar A, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts GA, Krausz T. MR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous women using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearances in fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:1465-1471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Stoker J, Jong Tjien Fa VE, Eijkemans MJC, et al. Endoanal MR imaging of perianal fistulas: the optimal imaging planes. Eur Radiol 1998; 9:1212-1216.
  63. van der Sijp JRM, Kamm MA, Nightingale J, et al. Radioisotope determination of regional colonic transit in severe constipation: comparison with radio-opaque markers. Gut 1993; 34:402-408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Evans RC, Kamm MA, Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE. The normal range and a simple diagram for determining whole gut transit time. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992; 7:15-17.[Medline]
  65. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography. 1. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 1984; 9:247-251.[Medline]
  66. Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE. Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 1988; 13:72-80.[Medline]
  67. Jorge JMN, Ger GC, Gonzalez L, Wexner SD. Patient position during cinedefecography: influence on perineal descent and other measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:927-931.[Medline]
  68. Hock D, Lombard R, Jehaes C, et al. Colpocystodefecography. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:1015-1021.
  69. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989; 30:1737-1749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT, Benson JT, Brubaker LP, Smith C. Dynamic cystoproctography: a technique for assessing disorders of the pelvic floor in women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:368-370.[Free Full Text]
  71. McGee SG, Bartram CI. Intra-anal intussusception: diagnosis by posteroanterior stress proctography. Abdom Imaging 1993; 2:136-140.
  72. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT, Hornback JA, Benson JT. Pelvic prolapse: assessment with evacuation proctography (defecography). Radiology 1992; 184:547-551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Archer BD, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Contrast medium gel for marking vaginal position during defecography. Radiology 1992; 182:278-279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Halligan S, Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Dynamic cystoproctography and physiological testing in women with urinary stress incontinence and urogenital prolapse. Clin Radiol 1996; 51:785-790.
  75. Halligan S, Bartram CI. Evacuation proctography combined with positive contrast peritoneography to demonstrate pelvic floor hernias. Abdom Imaging 1995; 20:442-445.[Medline]
  76. Bremmer S, Ahlback SO, Uden R, Mellgren A. Simultaneous defecography and peritoneography in defecation disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:969-973.[Medline]
  77. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in patients with obstructed defecation. Br J Surg 1997; 84:1555-1558.[Medline]
  78. Vanbeckevoort D, van Hoe L, Oyen R, Ponette E, Deprest J. Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:373-377.[Medline]
  79. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT, Hale DS, Benson JT. Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:81-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging compared to evacuation proctography to evaluate anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:775-779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Schoenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, Hany TF, Steiner P, Krestin GP. Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology 1998; 206:641-646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G, Healy JC, Bartram CI. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:661-666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Bates P, Bradley W, Glen G, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. J Urol 1979; 121:551-554.[Medline]
  84. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Overview: urinary incontinence in adults, clinical practice guideline update; Available athttp://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/uiovervw.htm. Accessed [date].
  85. Castleden CM, Duffin HM. Factors influencing outcome in elderly patients with urinary incontinence and detrusor instability. Age Ageing 1985; 14:303-307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  86. Thomas TM, Plymat KR, Blannin J, Meade TW. Prevalence of urinary incontinence. Br Med J 1980; 281:1243-1245.
  87. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 97(suppl 6):1-16.
  88. Blaivas JG, Ollson CA. Stress incontinence: classification and surgical approach. J Urol 1988; 139:727-731.[Medline]
  89. McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Pepe V, Kohorn EI. Stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 47:255-264.[Medline]
  90. Smith ARB, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 96:24-28.[Medline]
  91. Smith ARB, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of pudendal nerve damage in the aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 96:29-32.[Medline]
  92. Gilpin SA, Gosling JA, Smith ARB, Warrell DW. The pathogenesis of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine: a histological and histochemical study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 96:15-23.[Medline]
  93. Snooks SJ, Badenoch DF, Tiptaft RC, Swash M. Perineal damage in genuine stress urinary incontinence: an electrophysiological study. Br J Urol 1985; 57:422-426.[Medline]
  94. Snooks SJ, Barnes , Swash M. Damage to the innervation of the voluntary anal and periurethral sphincter musculature in incontinence: an electrophysiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1984; 47:1269-1273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  95. Hollander JB, Diokno AC. Urinary incontinence: pathophysiology. In: Benson JT, eds. Female pelvic floor disorders: investigation and management. New York, NY: Norton, 1992; 185-198.
  96. Foldspang A, Mommsen S, Lam GW, Elving L. Parity as a correlate of adult urinary incontinence prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46:595-600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  97. DeLancey JO. Stress urinary incontinence: where are we now, where should we go. Am J Obst Gynecol 1996; 175:311-319.[Medline]
  98. Koelbl H, Saz V, Doerfler D, Haeusler G, Sam C, Hanzal E. Transurethral injection of silicone microimplants for intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92:332-336.[Medline]
  99. Dietz HP, Wilson PD. Anatomical assessment of the bladder outlet and proximal urethra using ultrasound and videocystourethrography. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1998; 9:365-369.[Medline]
  100. Haab F, Zimmern P, Leach GE. Female stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: recognition and management. J Urol 1996; 156:3-17.[Medline]
  101. DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:347-348.
  102. Cosiski Marana HR, Moreira de Andrade J, Matheus de Sala M, Duarte G, Fonzar Marana RR. Evaluation of long-term results of surgical correction of stress urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996; 41:214-219.[Medline]
  103. Carr LK, Herschorn S, Leonhardt C. Magnetic resonance imaging after intraurethral collagen injected for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 1996; 155:1253-1255.[Medline]
  104. Leonhardt C, Krysl J, Arenson AM, Herschorn S. Periurethral injection of collagen in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: ultrasonographic appearance. Can Assoc Radiol J 1995; 46:189.[Medline]
  105. Klein HM, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Lagunilla J, Guenther RW. Assessment of incontinence with intraurethral US: preliminary results. Radiology 1993; 187:141-143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  106. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Saunders RC, Genadry RR. Reassessment of conventional concepts of pelvic floor and urethral weaknesses using dynamic fastscan MRI and high resolution endocavitary surface coil imaging of the urethra (abstr). J Urol 1994; 151:420A.
  107. DeLancey JO, Strohbehn K, Peschers UM, Quint LE. MR imaging of the urethral support system: anatomic considerations. Neurol Urodynam 1996; 15:362-363.
  108. Bass JS, Leach GE. Surgical treatment of concomitant urethral diverticulum and stress incontinence. Urol Clin North Am 1991; 18:365-373.[Medline]
  109. Keefe B, Warschauer DM, Tucker MS, Mittelstaedt CA. Diverticula of the female urethra: diagnosis by endovaginal and transperineal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156:1195-1197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  110. Webster JR. Combined video/pressure/flow cystourethrography in female patients with voiding disturbances. Urology 1975; 5:209-215.[Medline]
  111. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Clinical epidemiology of chronic constipation. J Clin Gastroenterol 1989; 11:525-536.[Medline]
  112. Sandler RS, Drossman DA. Bowel habits in young adults not seeking health care. Dig Dis Sci 1987; 32:841-845.[Medline]
  113. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE. Severe chronic constipation of young women: idiopathic slow transit constipation. Gut 1986; 27:41-48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  114. Rex DR, Lappas JC, Goutet RC, Madura JA. Selection of constipated subjects as subtotal colectomy candidates. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992; 15:212-217.[Medline]
  115. Halligan S, Bartram CI. Review: the radiological investigation of constipation. Clin Radiol 1995; 50:429-435.[Medline]
  116. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989; 30:1737-1749.
  117. Siproudhis L, Dautreme S, Ropert A, et al. Dyschesia and rectocele: a marriage of convenience?. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:1030-1036.[Medline]
  118. Halligan S, Bartram CI. Is digitation associated with proctographic abnormality?. Int J Colorectal Dis 1996; 11:167-171.[Medline]
  119. Loder P, Watson S, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Phillips RKSP. Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with Marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183:257-261.[Medline]
  120. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle JD. The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med 1966; 59:477-482.[Medline]
  121. Barnes PRH, Lennard-Jones JE. Balloon expulsion from the rectum in constipation of different types. Gut 1985; 26:1049-1052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  122. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE. Anismus in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 1985; 30:413-418.[Medline]
  123. Jones PN, Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Henry MM. Is paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle of functional importance?. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30:667-670.[Medline]
  124. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Anismus: the cause of constipation?. World J Surg 1992; 16:831-835.[Medline]
  125. Leroi AM. Anismus as a marker of sexual abuse: consequences of abuse on anorectal motility. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40:1411-1416.[Medline]
  126. Bleijenberg G, Kuijpers HC. Treatment of the spastic pelvic floor syndrome with biofeedback. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30:108-111.[Medline]
  127. Halligan S, McGee S, Bartram CI. Quantification of evacuation proctography. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1151-1154.[Medline]
  128. Halligan S, Thomas J, Bartram CI. Intrarectal pressures and balloon expulsion related to evacuation proctography. Gut 1995; 31:100-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  129. Halligan S, Bartram CI, Park HY, Kamm MA. The proctographic features of anismus. Radiology 1995; 197:679-682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  130. Halligan S, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Evacuation proctography in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: anatomic abnormalities and frequency of impaired emptying and prolapse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:91-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  131. Orrom WJ, Bartolo DCC, Miller R, Mortensen NJ, Roe AM. Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:41-46.[Medline]
  132. Christiansen J, Zhu BW, Rasmussen OO, Sorensen M. Internal rectal intussusception: results of surgical repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:1026-1029.[Medline]
  133. Johansson C, Nilsson BY, Holmstrom B, Dolk A, Mellgren A. Association between rectocele and paradoxical sphincter response. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:503-509.[Medline]
  134. Turnbull GK, Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31:190-197.[Medline]
  135. Halligan S, Bartram C, Hall C, Wingate J. Enterocele revealed by simultaneous evacuation proctography and peritoneography: does "defecation block" exist?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:461-466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  136. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD, Ehrenpreis ED, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Does perineal descent correlate with pudendal neuropathy?. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:475-483.
  137. Halligan S. Commentary: imaging of anorectal function. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:985-988.[Medline]
  138. Halligan S, Nicholls RY, Bartram CI. Proctographic changes after rectopexy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and preoperative predictive factors for a successful outcome. Br J Surg 1995; 82:314-317.[Medline]
  139. Klauser AG, Voderholzer WA, Heinrich CA, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA. Behavioural modification of colonic function: can constipation be learned?. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35:1271-1275.[Medline]
  140. Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Graf W. Relationships between defecographic findings, rectal emptying, and colonic transit time in constipate patients. Gut 1995; 36:907-912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  141. Ott DJ, Donati DL, Kerr RM, Chen MYM. Defecography: results in 55 patients and impact on clinical management. Abdom Imaging 1994; 9:349-354.
  142. Hiltunen KM, Kolehmainen H, Matikainen M. Does defaecography help in diagnosis and clinical decisionmaking in defecation disorders?. Abdom Imaging 1994; 19:355-358.[Medline]
  143. Dixon AK. Evidence based diagnostic radiology. Lancet 1997; 350:509-512.[Medline]
  144. Harvey C, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Hollings N, Shadev A, Kingston K. Evacuation proctography: a prospective study of diagnostic and therapeutic impact. Radiology 1999; 211:223-227.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  145. Lahr CJ. Evaluation and treatment of incontinence. Practical Gastroenterol 1988; 12:27-35.
  146. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995; 10:152-155.
  147. Neill ME, Swash M. Increased motor unit fibre density in the external anal sphincter muscle in ano-rectal incontinence: a single fibre EMG study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43:343-347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  148. Snooks SJ, Setchell M, Swash M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 1984; 2:546-550[same as reference 32].
  149. Kiff ES, Swash M. Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984; 71:614-616.[Medline]
  150. Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith ARB, Warrell DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97:770-779.[Medline]
  151. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308:887-891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  152. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991; 78:312-314.[Medline]
  153. Burnett SJD, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CTM, et al. Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 1991; 64:225-227.[Medline]
  154. Felt-Bersma RJF, van Baren R, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA. Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:249-253.[Medline]
  155. Gattuso JM, Kamm MA, Halligan S, Batram CI. The anal sphincter in idiopathic megarectum: effects of manual disimpaction under general anesthetic. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:435-439.[Medline]
  156. Sultan AH, Loder PB, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Vaginal endosonography: new approach to image the undisturbed anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1296-1299.[Medline]
  157. Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJC, Schouten WR, Laméris JS. Fecal incontinence: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212:453-458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  158. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet 1997; 349:612-615.[Medline]
  159. Keating JP, Stewart PJ, Eyers AA, Warner D, Bokey EL. Are special investigations of value in the management of patients with fecal incontinence?. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:896-901.[Medline]
  160. Frudinger A, Bartam CI, Spencer JAD, Kamm MA. Perineal examination as a predictor of underlying external sphincter damage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104:1009-1013.[Medline]
  161. Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MRB. Anal sphincter defects: correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg 1993; 218:201-205.[Medline]
  162. Sentovich SM, Wong WD, Blatchford GJ. Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:1000-1004.[Medline]
  163. Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Schroeder T, Fazio VW. Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:689-692.[Medline]
  164. Enck P, von Giesen HJ, Schafer A, et al. Comparison of anal sonography with conventional needle electromyography in the evaluation of anal sphincter defects. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91:2539-2543.[Medline]
  165. Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M, et al. Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:944-949.[Medline]
  166. Halligan S, Sultan A, Rottenberg G, Bartram CI. Endosonography of the anal sphincters in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995; 10:79-82.[Medline]
  167. Emblem R, Dhaenens G, Stien R, Mokrid L, Aasen AO, Bergan A. The importance of anal endosonography in the evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:42-48.
  168. Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Humphries PN, Kamm ME, Kmiot WA. Three dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury. Br J Surg 1999; 86:365-370.[Medline]
  169. deSouza NM, Puni R, Zbar A, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts G, Krausz T. MR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous women using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearances in fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:1465-1471.
  170. deSouza NM, Puni R, Gilderdale DJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter using an internal coil. Magn Reson Q 1995; 11:45-56.[Medline]
  171. Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Dhillon S, Kamm MA. Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:741-745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  172. Briel JW, Stoker J, Rociu E, Laméris JS, Hop WCJ, Schouten WR. External anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging adversely affects continence after sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 1999; 86:1322-1327.[Medline]
  173. Briel JW, Zimmerman DD, Stoker J, et al. Relationship between sphincter morphology on endoanal MRI and histopathological aspects of the external anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 2000; 15:87-90.[Medline]
  174. Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Barrett RC. Unilateral pudendal neuropathy: impact on outcome of anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:686-689.[Medline]
  175. Laurberg S, Swash M, Henry MM. Delayed external sphincter repair for obstetric tear. Br J Surg 1988; 75:786-788.[Medline]
  176. Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Rasmussen OO, Lose G, Christiansen J. Pudendal nerve damage increases the risk of fecal incontinence in women with anal sphincter rupture after childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74:434-440.[Medline]
  177. Gantke B, Schafer A, Enck P, Lubke HJ. Sonographic, manometric and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincter morphology and function. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:1037-1041.[Medline]
  178. Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M, et al. Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:944-949.
  179. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Salanga VD, Corredor C, Jagelman DG. Neurophysiologic assessment of the anal sphincters. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:606-612.[Medline]
  180. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:77-97.[Medline]
  181. Orrom WJ, Miller R, Cornes H, Duthie G, Mortensen NJ, Bartolo DC. Comparison of anterior sphincteroplasty and postanal repair in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:305-310.[Medline]
  182. Scheuer M, Kuijpers HC, Jacobs PP. Postanal repair restores anatomy rather than function. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32:960-963.[Medline]
  183. Ternent CA, Shahidharan M, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Sentovich SM. Transanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology findings affecting continence after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:462-467.[Medline]
  184. Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M. Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image: a prospective clinical study. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:878-885.[Medline]
  185. Pinedo G, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ, Roach R, Halligan S, Kamm MA. Results of repeat anal sphincter repair. Br J Surg 1999; 86:66-69.[Medline]
  186. Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F, et al. Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1991; 338:1163-1165.[Medline]
  187. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Nicholls RJ. Clinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter. Lancet 1998; 352:105-109.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. C. Colaiacomo, G. Masselli, E. Polettini, S. Lanciotti, E. Casciani, L. Bertini, and G. Gualdi
Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor: a Pictorial Review
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): e35 - e.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. M. Law and J. R. Fielding
MRI of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6_Supplement): S45 - S53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. M. Hecht, V. S. Lee, T. P. Tanpitukpongse, J. S. Babb, B. Taouli, S. Wong, N. Rosenblum, J. A. Kanofsky, and G. L. Bennett
MRI of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Dynamic True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession Versus HASTE
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 352 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
L. Boyadzhyan, S. S. Raman, and S. Raz
Role of Static and Dynamic MR Imaging in Surgical Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 949 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. V. Valsky and S. Yagel
Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasonography of the Pelvic Floor: Improving Visualization for New Clinical Applications and Better Functional Assessment
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1373 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Berton, G. Gola, and S. R. Wilson
Sonography of Benign Conditions of the Anal Canal: An Update
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 765 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. C. Dobben, M. P. Terra, M. Deutekom, J. F. M. Slors, L. W. M. Janssen, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker
The Role of Endoluminal Imaging in Clinical Outcome of Overlapping Anterior Anal Sphincter Repair in Patients with Fecal Incontinence
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W70 - W77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. C. Dobben, M. P. Terra, J. F. M. Slors, M. Deutekom, M. F. Gerhards, R. G. H. Beets-Tan, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker
External Anal Sphincter Defects in Patients with Fecal Incontinence: Comparison of Endoanal MR Imaging and Endoanal US
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 463 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
E M ANDERSON, C G FERRETT, and I LINDSEY
Imaging of the pelvic floor
Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 218 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. J. Macura, R. R. Genadry, and D. A. Bluemke
MR Imaging of the Female Urethra and Supporting Ligaments in Assessment of Urinary Incontinence: Spectrum of Abnormalities.
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 1135 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
J. Y. SHAGAM
Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Radiol. Technol., May 1, 2006; 77(5): 389 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. P. Terra, R. G. H. Beets-Tan, V. P. M. van Der Hulst, M. G. W. Dijkgraaf, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. C. Dobben, C. G. M. I. Baeten, and J. Stoker
Anal Sphincter Defects in Patients with Fecal Incontinence: Endoanal versus External Phased-Array MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 886 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
K. Bo and M. Sherburn
Evaluation of Female Pelvic-Floor Muscle Function and Strength
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2005; 85(3): 269 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Mallouhi, H. Bonatti, S. Peer, P. Lugger, F. Conrad, and G. Bodner
Detection and Characterization of Perianal Inflammatory Disease: Accuracy of Transperineal Combined Gray Scale and Color Doppler Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2004; 23(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. K. Kim, Y. J. Kim, M. S. Choo, and K.-S. Cho
The Urethra and Its Supporting Structures in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: MR Imaging Using an Endovaginal Coil
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1037 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. S. Sudakoff, F. Quiroz, and W. D. Foley
Sonography of Anorectal, Rectal, and Perirectal Abnormalities
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 131 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Stoker, E. Rociu, W. R. Schouten, and J. S. Lameris
Anovaginal and Rectovaginal Fistulas: Endoluminal Sonography Versus Endoluminal MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 737 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
F M Kelvin and D D T Maglinte
Extended proctography
Imaging, December 31, 2001; 13(6): 448 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J Stoker and E Rociu
Endoanal MRI in anal incontinence
Imaging, December 31, 2001; 13(6): 467 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J.-a. Ryu and B. Kim
MR Imaging of the Male and Female Urethra
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1169 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE