Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kantarci, K.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kantarci, K.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, R. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiology. 2001;219:101-107.)
© RSNA, 2001


Neuroradiology

Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease: Regional Diffusivity of Water1

Kejal Kantarci, MD, Clifford R. Jack, Jr, MD, Yue Cheng Xu, MD, PhD, Norberg G. Campeau, MD, Peter C. O’Brien, PhD, Glenn E. Smith, PhD, Robert J. Ivnik, PhD, Bradley F. Boeve, MD, Emre Kokmen, MD, Eric G. Tangalos, MD and Ronald C. Petersen, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (K.K., C.R.J., Y.C.X., N.G.C.), Health Sciences Research (P.C.O., R.C.P.), Psychiatry and Psychology (G.E.S., R.J.I.), Neurology (B.F.B., E.K., R.C.P.), and Internal Medicine (E.G.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Received May 31, 2000; revision requested July 10; revision received August 11; accepted August 31. Supported by National Institutes of Health and National Institute on Aging grants AG11378, AG06786, and AG16574, and the Alzheimer’s Association. Address correspondence to C.R.J. (e-mail: jack.clifford@mayo.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To compare the regional diffusivity of water in the brains of normally aging elderly people and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance images were obtained in 21 patients with Alzheimer disease, 19 patients with MCI, and 55 normally aging elderly control subjects without evidence of cognitive impairment. Regions of interest were drawn to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the anisotropy index (AI) in frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, anterior, and posterior cingulate white matter (WM), and the thalami and hippocampi.

RESULTS: Hippocampal ADC was higher in MCI and Alzheimer disease patients than in control subjects. ADC of the temporal stem and posterior cingulate, occipital, and parietal WM was higher in Alzheimer disease patients than in control subjects. Except for occipital AI, which was lower in MCI patients than in control subjects, there were no differences in AI among the three groups for any of the regions.

CONCLUSION: Hippocampal ADC was significantly different between control subjects and MCI patients, many of whom likely have preclinical Alzheimer disease. Elevation in hippocampal ADC may reflect early ultrastructural changes in the progression of Alzheimer disease.

Index terms: Alzheimer disease, 10.83, 1341.83 • Brain, MR, 13.121412, 13.121413, 13.121416, 13.12146 • Hippocampus, 1341.83 • Magnetic resonance (MR), diffusion study, 13.121412, 13.121413, 13.121416, 13.12146, 13.92 • Magnetic resonance (MR), tissue characterization, 13.121412, 13.121413, 13.121416, 13.12146, 13.92


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is sensitive to microscopic random motion of water molecules in biologic tissue (1). It provides functional or physiologic information not present on conventional T1- and T2-weighted anatomic MR images (2). For example, diffusion-weighted MR imaging now plays an important role in detection of hyperacute cerebral ischemia owing to the comparably lower sensitivity of T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging for identifying early ischemic changes (3).

Pathologic changes in the cortical gray matter of the brain in Alzheimer disease are characterized by the accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques along with neuronal and synaptic loss that produce cerebral atrophy. The initial pathologic involvement has been shown to occur in the medial temporal lobes, and MR imaging–guided volumetry has depicted the early atrophy of the hippocampi in patients with mild Alzheimer disease (4,5). Besides the pathologic cortical conditions, white matter (WM) rarefaction with axonal damage and gliosis have been reported in patients with Alzheimer disease (6). With diffusion-weighted MR imaging, it is possible to quantify physiologic alterations in water diffusion resulting from microscopic structural changes that are not detectable with anatomic imaging.

The syndrome of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) resides within the cognitive continuum from normal aging to Alzheimer disease. MCI patients have a substantially higher rate of progression to Alzheimer disease (12%–15% per year) compared with cognitively normal elderly people (1%–2% per year) (7). Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of MCI have been established, and these patients are the primary study group in several national trials (79). Findings at diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the brains of patients with Alzheimer disease have been studied (1012). We are not aware, however, of studies addressing the findings at diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with MCI.

In this study, we hypothesized that the magnitude of water diffusion measured with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the directionality of diffusion measured with the anisotropy index (AI) may be altered by the early ultrastructural changes caused by the pathologic process of Alzheimer disease. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the regional diffusivity of water in normally aging elderly people and patients with MCI or Alzheimer disease at different points along the cognitive continuum from normal aging to Alzheimer disease.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recruitment and Characterization
Between September 1998 and April 2000, 21 patients with Alzheimer disease, 19 patients with MCI, and 55 normally aging people (Table 1) were consecutively recruited from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC)/Alzheimer’s Disease Patient Registry (ADPR) at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, prospective longitudinal studies of aging and dementia approved by our institutional review board (13). Informed consent for participation was obtained from every subject or an appropriate surrogate. Individuals participating in ADRC/ADPR were evaluated by a behavioral neurologist (B.F.B., E.K., R.C.P.) and a neuropsychologist (G.E.S., R.J.I.). Neurologic examination and neuropsychologic tests were performed, including the MMSE (14); the educational level of the subjects (in years) was recorded; and all subjects underwent structural brain MR imaging and routine laboratory testing. At the completion of the evaluation, a consensus committee meeting was held with the behavioral neurologists, neuropsychologists, nurses, and geriatrician who evaluated the subjects. Subjects were excluded who had structural abnormalities that could produce dementia, such as cortical infarction, tumor, or subdural hematoma, or who had experienced treatments or concurrent illnesses other than Alzheimer disease that interfered with cognitive function. Subjects were not excluded for the presence of age-related areas of WM hyperintensity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Demographic Data of Subjects
 
The diagnosis of Alzheimer disease was made according to the criteria for dementia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 3rd edition, revised (DSM-III-R) (15), and the criteria for Alzheimer disease according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS/ADRDA) (16). The severity of dementia was rated with the Clinical Dementia Rating score (17). APOE genotyping was performed for all subjects. Subjects with genotypes known to confer increased risk of Alzheimer disease ({epsilon}3/4 and {epsilon}4/4) were grouped as {epsilon}4 carriers, and those with the genotypes {epsilon}2/3 and {epsilon}3/3 were grouped as {epsilon}4 noncarriers. Subjects with the genotype {epsilon}2/4 were not included in APOE analyses.

Patients with MCI met the following criteria: (a) memory complaint, (b) normal general cognition, (c) normal activities of daily living, and (d) not demented (7). These patients had a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0.5 with isolated memory impairment without deficits in other cognitive domains. This diagnosis of MCI represents a clinical judgment and is not based solely on fixed cutoff scores of psychometric tests.

Controls were defined as individuals who (a) were independently functioning community dwellers, (b) did not have active neurologic or psychiatric conditions, (c) had no cognitive complaints, (d) had a normal neurologic examination, and (e) were not taking any psychoactive medications in doses that would effect cognition.

MR Imaging and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging studies were performed with a 1.5-T MR imager (Signa; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). After sagittal scout imaging, coronal T1-weighted images were obtained to be used as an anatomic reference for the placement of the regions of interest (ROIs). Special attention was paid to the symmetric positioning of the patient’s head. Single-shot, echo-planar, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) diffusion-weighted MR imaging was performed in a coronal plane with repetition time msec/echo time msec/inversion time msec of 9,999/93/2,200, section thickness of 5 mm, section spacing of 2.5 mm, and field of view of 40 x 20 cm to cover the whole head. FLAIR imaging with constant magnetic induction field, or B0, of 0 sec/mm2 and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with B0 of 1,000 sec/mm2 in three orthogonal directions were performed in each section. With image analysis software (FUNCTOOL; GE Medical Systems), average ADC maps were computed pixel by pixel on the basis of the equation by Stejskal and Tanner (1).

Elliptic ROIs of 12–30 pixels (29.3–73.2 mm2) that concurrently appeared on the ADC maps were drawn on the FLAIR images (Fig 1). Eight pairs of ROIs were placed in each subject over the WM of the right and left frontal lobes, parietal lobes, occipital lobes, medial temporal lobes (temporal stem), anterior and posterior cingulate gyri, thalami, and hippocampi by the same investigator (K.K.), who was blinded to the clinical diagnoses of the subjects (Figs 1, 2).



View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. (a) Coronal T1-weighted MR image (700/14) is used to guide placement of the ROIs. (b) Coronal FLAIR MR image (9,999/93/2,200, B0 = 0 sec/mm2) depicts (right and left, respectively) the anterior cingulate WM (7, 8), thalamic (5, 6), temporal stem (3, 4), and hippocampal (1, 2) ROIs. (c) ADC (average) map, which was generated from the FLAIR image and three orthogonal diffusion-weighted MR images pixel by pixel on the basis of the Stejskal and Tanner equation, depicts the same ROIs.

 


View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. (a) Coronal T1-weighted MR image (700/14) is used to guide placement of the ROIs. (b) Coronal FLAIR MR image (9,999/93/2,200, B0 = 0 sec/mm2) depicts (right and left, respectively) the anterior cingulate WM (7, 8), thalamic (5, 6), temporal stem (3, 4), and hippocampal (1, 2) ROIs. (c) ADC (average) map, which was generated from the FLAIR image and three orthogonal diffusion-weighted MR images pixel by pixel on the basis of the Stejskal and Tanner equation, depicts the same ROIs.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1c. (a) Coronal T1-weighted MR image (700/14) is used to guide placement of the ROIs. (b) Coronal FLAIR MR image (9,999/93/2,200, B0 = 0 sec/mm2) depicts (right and left, respectively) the anterior cingulate WM (7, 8), thalamic (5, 6), temporal stem (3, 4), and hippocampal (1, 2) ROIs. (c) ADC (average) map, which was generated from the FLAIR image and three orthogonal diffusion-weighted MR images pixel by pixel on the basis of the Stejskal and Tanner equation, depicts the same ROIs.

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Coronal FLAIR MR images (9,999/93/2,200, B0 = 0 sec/mm2) depict the (a) frontal lobe and (b) posterior cingulate, (c) parietal, and (d) occipital WM ROIs. 1 = right, 2 = left.

 


View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Coronal FLAIR MR images (9,999/93/2,200, B0 = 0 sec/mm2) depict the (a) frontal lobe and (b) posterior cingulate, (c) parietal, and (d) occipital WM ROIs. 1 = right, 2 = left.

 


View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. Coronal FLAIR MR images (9,999/93/2,200, B0 = 0 sec/mm2) depict the (a) frontal lobe and (b) posterior cingulate, (c) parietal, and (d) occipital WM ROIs. 1 = right, 2 = left.

 


View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2d. Coronal FLAIR MR images (9,999/93/2,200, B0 = 0 sec/mm2) depict the (a) frontal lobe and (b) posterior cingulate, (c) parietal, and (d) occipital WM ROIs. 1 = right, 2 = left.

 
Parietal and frontal WM ROIs were placed away from the ventricles to exclude visibly apparent areas of periventricular WM hyperintensity and to place the ROIs at the same location in every patient. The hippocampal ROIs were manually traced over the hippocampal heads to exclude the perihippocampal cerebrospinal fluid spaces. The thalamic, anterior cingulate WM, and temporal stem ROIs were placed on the same image on which the hippocampal heads were traced. The thalamic ROIs were placed over the medial dorsal nuclei. These nuclei constitute the limbic thalamus, which receives input from the hippocampus and amygdala and projects fibers to the limbic cortex, structures known to be involved with the early pathologic conditions of Alzheimer disease (18).

The temporal stem is defined as the WM connection between the temporal lobe and the frontal and parietal lobes (19). Because of the low spatial resolution of the FLAIR images, coronal T1-weighted images obtained with identical thickness and location were used as an anatomic reference for the placement and tracing of the ROI (Fig 1). AIs were calculated for every WM ROI: AI = ADCmax - ADCmin/ADCaverage (20).

Statistical Analyses
In the three clinical groups, differences in the mean ages, education (in years), and the MMSE scores were tested with rank sum tests, and sex differences were tested with {chi}2 tests. Differences in ADC and AI in the right and left hemispheres were tested with signed rank tests. The effects of age and sex on ADC and AI were tested in a single model by means of multiple regression analysis in controls only, as the data in controls should be free of the confounding effects of disease. The differences in the ADC and AI of the APOE {epsilon}4 carriers and noncarriers were tested with rank sum tests in the three clinical groups independently. Between-group differences in ADC and AI were tested by means of multiple regression analysis. Differences with a P value less than .05 were considered significant. The sensitivity and specificity of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in distinguishing Alzheimer disease and MCI patients from controls were calculated at a fixed specificity of 80%.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The mean ages of the controls and MCI or Alzheimer disease patients were not significantly different (P > .05). The differences in male-to-female ratios of the three groups were not significant (P > .05). Education level was higher in controls than in Alzheimer disease patients (P = .038). The mean MMSE scores of patients with Alzheimer disease were lower than those of controls and MCI patients (P < .001). The mean MMSE scores of MCI patients were lower than those of controls (P = .004). The median Clinical Dementia Rating score in Alzheimer disease patients was 1.0 (range, 0.5–2.0). The APOE {epsilon}4 carrier-to-noncarrier ratios were higher in Alzheimer disease patients than in controls (P = .001) and higher in MCI patients than in controls (P = .004). The APOE {epsilon}4 carrier-to-noncarrier ratios of MCI and Alzheimer disease patients were not different (P > .05). There was no correlation between the APOE genotype and ADC or AI in any of the ROIs in each clinical group.

Except for higher right than left thalamic ADC (P = .001), we did not find any difference between ADC in ROIs from the right and left hemispheres in controls. Owing to this difference, right and left thalamic ADC were analyzed separately for all three clinical groups, and the homologous hemisphere values were combined for the remaining ROIs. We tested for the effects of age on ADC and AI in controls, and there was no association between age and ADC or AI in any of the ROIs (P > .05).

The mean plus or minus one SD for ADC obtained in each of the eight ROIs in controls and MCI or Alzheimer disease patients and the differences between the ADC of the three clinical groups are presented in Table 2. The only measurement that differed between controls and MCI patients was the hippocampal ADC, which was higher in MCI patients than in controls (P = .016) and was similar to that in Alzheimer disease patients. Although a similar trend was seen in the ADC from other ROIs, we did not find any difference between the ADC of MCI patients and controls in the remaining ROIs (P > .05). ADC was higher in Alzheimer disease patients than controls in the temporal stem (P = .014), occipital (P = .047), parietal (P = .004), and posterior cingulate WM (P = .001), and hippocampal (P = .001) ROIs (Table 2) (Fig 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. ADCs and Between-Group Comparison of ADCs in Control, MCI, and Alzheimer Disease Subjects
 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Bar graph shows mean ADC from the eight ROIs for the control subjects (white bars) and MCI (light gray bars) or Alzheimer disease (dark gray bars) patients. Error bars indicate plus or minus one SD. * = significant findings: the parietal, posterior (P) cingulate WM, and hippocampal ADC are higher in Alzheimer disease patients than in control subjects (P < .01); the temporal stem and occipital WM ADC are higher in Alzheimer disease patients than in control subjects (P < .05); and hippocampal ADC is higher in MCI patients than in control subjects (P < .05).

 
To assess the potential diagnostic usefulness of ADC measurements, we fixed the specificity for intergroup discrimination at 80%, which corresponds to an ADC threshold value of 891 x 10-6 mm2/sec, and calculated the diagnostic sensitivity for each of the clinical group pairs. This assessment was performed for only the hippocampus, because only hippocampal ADC was significantly higher in both Alzheimer disease and MCI patients compared with controls. At a fixed specificity of 80%, the sensitivity of distinguishing Alzheimer disease patients from controls was 57% and MCI patients from controls was 47% (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Hippocampal ADC for Distinction between Control Subjects versus Alzheimer Disease and MCI Patients at a Specificity of 80%
 
AI in the temporal stem, frontal, parietal, occipital, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate WM ROIs was analyzed. In the controls, anterior cingulate AI was higher on the right than the left side (P < .05). Other than that, there were no side-to-side differences in the AI of homologous brain regions. Except for the lower occipital AI in MCI patients than in controls (P = .036), there was no difference between the AI of the controls and MCI or Alzheimer disease patients in any of the WM ROIs (P > .05).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Diffusivity of water depends primarily on the presence of microscopic structural barriers in tissue that can alter the random motion of water molecules. Membranes of cell bodies, axons, and myelin sheaths impede the movement of water in the brain tissue. Pathologic disruption of cell membranes, loss of myelin, and axonal processes would lessen the restriction on the movement of water, and therefore the diffusivity measured with ADC would be expected to increase. Water diffuses along the orientation of the axons that are aligned in tracts, and this directionality of water diffusion is called anisotropy. Loss of tissue organization would also cause a decrease in anisotropy.

In this study, the magnitude of water diffusion within the temporal stem, occipital, posterior cingulate, and parietal WM ROIs was greater in patients with Alzheimer disease than in controls and MCI patients. Our findings are in agreement with those in prior studies that revealed higher ADC in the temporal stem and parietal WM in Alzheimer disease patients compared with controls (11,12). The posterior cingulate gyrus is a part of the limbic system and is known to be involved early in the pathologic progression of Alzheimer disease, as has been demonstrated with functional imaging studies. Positron emission tomography, or PET (21,22), and single photon emission computed tomography, or SPECT (23), revealed decreased glucose metabolism and blood flow in the posterior cingulate gyrus and pericingular parietal cortex in preclinical Alzheimer disease patients and patients at risk for developing Alzheimer disease in comparison with normally aging elderly people.

With proton MR spectroscopy, an elevation in the myoinositol-to-creatine ratio has been identified in the posterior cingulate gyri in both patients with MCI and Alzheimer disease in comparison with elderly controls (24). The temporal stem serves as a conduit for temporal-to-extratemporal WM tracts within which the spatial orientation of the fibers are generally uniform. It was previously postulated that this increase in ADC reflects decreased fiber density, including the disruption and loss of axonal membranes or myelin (12).

Correlation of MR imaging findings with pathologic WM conditions in Alzheimer disease indicates that areas of periventricular hyperintensity are often related to the loss of myelinated axons and gliosis in the deep WM (25). WM rarefaction is associated with vascular risk factors, especially hypertension. Independent of periventricular changes, WM degeneration of secondary or Wallerian type has been identified to correlate with pathologic subjacent cortical conditions in Alzheimer disease (6,26). Findings in these studies suggest that two independent forms of WM degeneration may coexist in Alzheimer disease patients: periventricular WM disease, which is usually evident at MR imaging and is presumably vascular or ischemic in origin, and Wallerian type WM degeneration secondary to pathologic adjacent cortical neurodegenerative conditions. The WM regions we studied did not include areas of periventricular hyperintensity on FLAIR images. In light of the previous studies of the pathologic WM conditions in Alzheimer disease, the finding of increased diffusivity of water in the temporal stem and posterior cingulate, occipital, and parietal WM in Alzheimer disease patients suggests rarefaction of axons and myelin and can be explained on the basis of anterograde Wallerian degeneration.

A decrease in anisotropy in the temporal stem and parietal WM of Alzheimer disease patients has been reported (1012). It was postulated that the decrease in anisotropy reflects decreased fiber density including loss of axonal membranes or myelin (12). Except for lower occipital AI in MCI patients than in controls, our data did not reveal any other differences in AI among controls and MCI or Alzheimer disease patients. This discrepancy may be related to a technical limitation in diffusion-weighted MR imaging that was also encountered by the previous investigators (11). Because AI is a measure of directionality of diffusion, it is highly sensitive to the variable orientation of the head with respect to the fixed geometry of the MR imaging system gradients.

In this study, the diffusion gradients were applied in the three logical orthogonal planes, which would cause a high degree of variability if all the subjects’ heads were not the same size and oriented the same way. This was apparent in our data as high variance in AI, which may be the reason we did not find a difference between the Alzheimer disease patients and controls, as reported by other groups (11,12). We calculated AI on the basis of only the trace of the diffusion tensor. Solving the entire tensor with rotationally invariant techniques and application of a higher number of diffusion gradients would overcome this problem (27).

In the controls, the ADC from the medial dorsal nuclei of thalami were higher on the right than the left side. This difference was not present in MCI or Alzheimer disease patients. There was however a trend of increased ADC in the left thalami of Alzheimer disease and MCI patients compared with controls that was not significant. Although such a difference has not been reported before, to our knowledge, our data from 53 normally aging elderly people is one of the largest series in the literature. Our data imply that a side-to-side structural difference normally exists, that is, the neurons and glial cells may be more densely packed in the medial dorsal nuclei of the left compared with the right thalami, so that the extracellular space is narrower and the diffusivity is less. However, we are not aware of any histologic studies that would support this idea.

Mean ADC was nearly always higher in MCI patients than in controls and lower than Alzheimer disease patients. However, only in the hippocampus did this trend reach significance. On the basis of prior longitudinal clinical studies, patients with MCI progress to Alzheimer disease at a rate of 12% per year (7). We can be fairly certain that a majority of our MCI patients had preclinical Alzheimer disease, but a smaller proportion with isolated memory problems may never progress to Alzheimer disease in their lifetime. Involvement of the hippocampus occurs very early during the pathologic progression of Alzheimer disease (4). Synapse and neuron loss, which coexist with pathologic neurofibrillary conditions, is present in the hippocampi of patients with preclinical Alzheimer disease who have isolated memory problems as in MCI (2830). The increased diffusivity in the hippocampi of both MCI and Alzheimer disease patients is in agreement with the pathologic evolution of Alzheimer disease. It suggests expansion of the extracellular space owing to neuron loss. In addition, glial activation associated with neuritic senile plaques would also contribute to elevated ADC by producing an expansion of the extracellular space (31).

Diffusion of water in the hippocampi of Alzheimer disease patients has also been studied by other groups. One recent study showed higher ADC in the hippocampi of Alzheimer disease patients than in controls (11). Another study did not identify any difference between the hippocampal ADC of normally aging elderly people and Alzheimer disease patients (12). In both of these studies, however, the hippocampi were not traced to exclude the contributions from the cerebrospinal fluid but rather an ROI was placed over the hippocampi. Cerebrospinal fluid may contribute to ADC measurements: A previous study revealed higher ADC values from the cortical gray matter with a spin-echo diffusion sequence compared with an inversion-recovery diffusion sequence owing to contamination with the cerebrospinal fluid signal (32). Suppression of cerebrospinal fluid would be especially important in patients with Alzheimer disease, in whom the hippocampi are atrophic and partial volume averaging of cerebrospinal fluid may be present when relatively thick sections were used, as in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Therefore, we used an echo-planar FLAIR pulse sequence for diffusion-weighted MR imaging to avoid contributions from the cerebrospinal fluid. Cerebrospinal fluid was not suppressed in the previous studies (11,12), which may be a reason for discrepant findings.

These data indicate that diffusion-weighted MR imaging may help identify early ultrastructural changes in the progression of Alzheimer disease. At our center, the accuracy for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease compared with the pathologic diagnosis is 81%. Furthermore, owing to the high degree of overlap between the ADC values of the three groups and low sensitivity in distinguishing Alzheimer disease and MCI patients from controls, our findings suggest limited value for clinical diagnosis in individual patients. However, measurements of ADC may be valuable in instances where group effects are of interest, such as drug trials. With longitudinal follow-up of MCI patients, we will be able to determine whether there is a correlation between the hippocampal ADC and the rate of progression to Alzheimer disease.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Ruth Cha, MS, at their institution for performing the statistical analysis.


    FOOTNOTES
 
See also the editorial by Schwartz (pp 8–9 ) in this issue.

Abbreviations: ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient, FLAIR = fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, MCI = mild cognitive impairment, MMSE = Mini Mental State Examination, ROI = region of interest, WM = white matter

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, K.K., C.R.J.; study concepts and design, K.K., C.R.J.; literature research, K.K.; clinical studies, K.K., C.R.J., P.C.O., G.E.S., R.J.I., B.F.B., E.K., E.G.T., R.C.P.; data acquisition, K.K.; data analysis/interpretation, K.K., C.R.J., P.C.O.; statistical analysis, P.C.O., K.K.; manuscript preparation, K.K.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, K.K., C.R.J.; manuscript editing, K.K.; manuscript revision/review, K.K., C.R.J.; manuscript final version approval, all authors.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin-echo in presence of a time dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965; 42:288-292.
  2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986; 161:401-407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Provenzale JM, Sorensen GA. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute stroke: theoretic considerations and clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:1459-1467.[Abstract]
  4. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological staging of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1991; 82:239-259.[Medline]
  5. Jack CR, Petersen RC, Xu Y, et al. Medial temporal atrophy in MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1997; 49:786-794.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Englund E. Neuropathology of white matter changes in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1998; 9(suppl 1):6-12.
  7. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999; 56:303-308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, et al. Apolipoprotein E status as a predictor of the development of Alzheimer’s disease in memory impaired individuals. JAMA 1995; 273:1274-1278.[Abstract]
  9. Smith GE, Petersen RC, Parisi JE, Ivnik RJ. Definition, course, and outcome of mild cognitive impairment. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 1996; 3:141-147.
  10. Hanyu H, Shindo H, Kakizaki D, Abe K, Iwamoto T, Takasaki M. Increased water diffusion in cerebral white matter in Alzheimer’s disease. Gerontology 1997; 43:343-351.[Medline]
  11. Sandson TA, Felician O, Edelman RR, Warach S. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; 10:166-171.[Medline]
  12. Hanyu H, Sakurai H, Takasaki M, Shindo H, Abe K. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the hippocampus and temporal white matter in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci 1998; 156:195-200.[Medline]
  13. Petersen RC, Kokmen E, Tangalos E, Ivnik RJ, Kurland LT. Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Patient Registry. Aging (Milano) 1990; 2:408-415.[Medline]
  14. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12:189-198.[Medline]
  15. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-III-R: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
  16. McKhann GM, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984; 34:939-944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993; 43:2412-2414.
  18. Gower EC. Efferent projections from limbic cortex of the temporal pole to the magnocellular medial dorsal nucleus in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 1989; 280:343-358.[Medline]
  19. Duvernoy HM. The human hippocampus: functional anatomy, vascularization and serial sections with MRI Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1998.
  20. Brunberg JA, Chenevert TL, McKeever PE, et al. In vivo MR determination of water diffusion coefficients and diffusion anisotropy: correlation with structural alteration in gliomas of the cerebral hemispheres. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:361-371.[Abstract]
  21. Minoshima S, Giordani B, Berent S, Frey KA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 1997; 42:85-94.[Medline]
  22. Reiman EM, Caselli RJ, Yun LS, et al. Preclinical evidence of Alzheimer’s disease in persons homozygous for the {epsilon}4 allele for apolipoprotein E. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:752-758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Johnson KA, Jones K, Holman BL, et al. Preclinical prediction of Alzheimer’s disease using SPECT. Neurology 1998; 50:1563-1571.[Abstract]
  24. Kantarci K, Jack CR, Xu YC, et al. Regional metabolic patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a 1H MRS study. Neurology 2000; 55:210-217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Leys D, Wolters EC, Ravid R, Kamphorst W. Histopathologic correlates of white matter changes on MRI in Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging. Neurology 1995; 45:883- 888.[Abstract]
  26. Smith CD, Snowdon DA, Wang H, Markesbery WR. White matter volumes and periventricular white matter hyperintensities in aging and dementia. Neurology 2000; 54:838-842.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996; 201:637-648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Price JL, Morris JC. Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 1999; 45:358-368.[Medline]
  29. Delacourte A, David JP, Sergeant N, et al. The biochemical pathway of neurofibrillary degeneration in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1999; 52:1158-1165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Grober E, Dickson D, Sliwinski MJ, et al. Memory and mental status correlates of modified Braak staging. Neurobiol Aging 1999; 20:573-579.[Medline]
  31. Dickson DW. The pathogenesis of senile plaques. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1997; 56:321-329.[Medline]
  32. Kwong KK, McKinstry RC, Chien D, Crawley AP, Pearlman JD, Rosen BR. CSF-suppressed quantitative single-shot diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1991; 21:157-163.[Medline]

Related Article

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping in Patients with Alzheimer Disease or Mild Cognitive Impairment and in Normally Aging Control Subjects: Present and Future
Richard B. Schwartz
Radiology 2001 219: 8-9. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
K. Simonyan, F. Tovar-Moll, J. Ostuni, M. Hallett, V. F. Kalasinsky, M. R. Lewin-Smith, E. J. Rushing, A. O. Vortmeyer, and C. L. Ludlow
Focal white matter changes in spasmodic dysphonia: a combined diffusion tensor imaging and neuropathological study
Brain, February 1, 2008; 131(2): 447 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.C.G.M. van Es, W.M. van der Flier, F. Admiraal Behloul, H. Olofsen, E.L.E.M. Bollen, H.A.M. Middelkoop, A.W.E. Weverling-Rijnsburger, J. van der Grond, R.G.J. Westendorp, and M.A. van Buchem
Lobar Distribution of Changes in Gray Matter and White Matter in Memory Clinic Patients: Detected Using Magnetization Transfer Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1938 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. Sydykova, R. Stahl, O. Dietrich, M. Ewers, M. F. Reiser, S. O. Schoenberg, H.-J. Moller, H. Hampel, and S. J. Teipel
Fiber Connections between the Cerebral Cortex and the Corpus Callosum in Alzheimer's Disease: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Voxel-Based Morphometry Study
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2276 - 2282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M. Ito, H. Watanabe, Y. Kawai, N. Atsuta, F. Tanaka, S. Naganawa, H. Fukatsu, and G. Sobue
Usefulness of combined fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of involvement in multiple system atrophy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 78(7): 722 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Stahl, O. Dietrich, S. J. Teipel, H. Hampel, M. F. Reiser, and S. O. Schoenberg
White Matter Damage in Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Assessment with Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging and Parallel Imaging Techniques
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 483 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
L. Minati, M. Grisoli, and M. G. Bruzzone
MR Spectroscopy, Functional MRI, and Diffusion-Tensor Imaging in the Aging Brain: A Conceptual Review
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, March 1, 2007; 20(1): 3 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Ramani, J. H. Jensen, and J. A. Helpern
Quantitative MR Imaging in Alzheimer Disease
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 26 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. M. Ray, H. Wang, Y. Chu, Y.-F. Chen, A. Bert, A. N. Hasso, and M.-Y. Su
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Regional Gray Matter and White Matter Structures
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 197 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Taoka, S. Iwasaki, M. Sakamoto, H. Nakagawa, A. Fukusumi, K. Myochin, S. Hirohashi, T. Hoshida, and K. Kichikawa
Diffusion anisotropy and diffusivity of white matter tracts within the temporal stem in Alzheimer disease: evaluation of the "tract of interest" by diffusion tensor tractography.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 1040 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P.-L. Khong, L. H.T. Leung, A. S.M. Fung, D. Y.T. Fong, D. Qiu, D. L.W. Kwong, G.-C. Ooi, G. McAlanon, G. Cao, and G. C.F. Chan
White Matter Anisotropy in Post-Treatment Childhood Cancer Survivors: Preliminary Evidence of Association With Neurocognitive Function
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2006; 24(6): 884 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. Kantarci, R. C. Petersen, B. F. Boeve, D. S. Knopman, S. D. Weigand, P. C. O'Brien, M. M. Shiung, G. E. Smith, R. J. Ivnik, E. G. Tangalos, et al.
DWI predicts future progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment
Neurology, March 8, 2005; 64(5): 902 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
S. J. Choi, K. O. Lim, I. Monteiro, and B. Reisberg
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Frontal White Matter Microstructure in Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Preliminary Study
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, March 1, 2005; 18(1): 12 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Symms, H R Jager, K Schmierer, and T A Yousry
A review of structural magnetic resonance neuroimaging
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 75(9): 1235 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. Head, R. L. Buckner, J. S. Shimony, L. E. Williams, E. Akbudak, T. E. Conturo, M. McAvoy, J. C. Morris, and A. Z. Snyder
Differential Vulnerability of Anterior White Matter in Nondemented Aging with Minimal Acceleration in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type: Evidence from Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2004; 14(4): 410 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Norfray and J. M. Provenzale
Alzheimer's Disease: Neuropathologic Findings and Recent Advances in Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 3 - 13.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. R. Petrella, R. E. Coleman, and P. M. Doraiswamy
Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease: A Look to the Future
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 315 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
W. M. van der Flier, D.M. J. van den Heuvel, A.W. E. Weverling-Rijnsburger, A. Spilt, E.L.E. M. Bollen, R.G. J. Westendorp, H.A. M. Middelkoop, and M. A. van Buchem
Cognitive decline in AD and mild cognitive impairment is associated with global brain damage
Neurology, September 24, 2002; 59(6): 874 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Bozzali, A Falini, M Franceschi, M Cercignani, M Zuffi, G Scotti, G Comi, and M Filippi
White matter damage in Alzheimer's disease assessed in vivo using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2002; 72(6): 742 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. B. Schwartz
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping in Patients with Alzheimer Disease or Mild Cognitive Impairment and in Normally Aging Control Subjects: Present and Future
Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 8 - 9.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend