Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malouf, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malouf, A. J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. G.
(Radiology. 2001;219:359-365.)
© RSNA, 2001


Pediatric Imaging

Implementation of the STOP Protocol for Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell Anemia by Using Duplex Power Doppler Imaging1

Abe J. Malouf, Jr, MD, Jennifer E. Hamrick-Turner, MD 2, Michael C. Doherty, MD, Gurmeet S. Dhillon, MD, Rathi V. Iyer, MD and Mary G. Smith, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (A.J.M., J.E.H.T., M.C.D., G.S.D.) and Pediatrics (R.V.I., M.G.S.), University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 29, 2000; revision requested May 10; revision received July 14; accepted August 2. Address correspondence to A.J.M., 226 Oakwood Ct, Winston-Salem, NC 27103 (e-mail: abemalouf@yahoo.com).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To compare the results of the nonduplex ultrasonography (US) Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP) with those of transcranial duplex power Doppler US by using the STOP protocol and to correlate abnormal transcranial Doppler findings with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR angiographic findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-five asymptomatic patients aged 2–16 years with sickle cell anemia or sickle cell-ß thalassemia were examined by using transcranial duplex power Doppler US with a 2.5-MHz transducer and classified according to STOP criteria. The results were compared with those obtained in the nonduplex STOP study. Eight of 10 patients with abnormal results, as well as one who had normal results and a subsequent stroke, were examined with MR imaging and MR angiography.

RESULTS: Ten (8.0%) patients were judged to have abnormal findings by using the duplex Doppler US and STOP criteria compared with 9.4% of patients in the nonduplex US STOP study. Of the eight patients with abnormal transcranial Doppler US results who underwent MR imaging and MR angiography, six had abnormal MR imaging findings and all eight had abnormal MR angiographic findings.

CONCLUSION: The STOP protocol can be reproduced by using duplex power Doppler US. Abnormal results with the STOP criteria strongly suggest vascular abnormality.

Index terms: Brain, infarction, 13.4352, 13.78 • Cerebral blood vessels, US, 178.12984, 178.12989 • Sickle cell disease (SS, SC), 13.651, 13.652 • Ultrasound (US), power Doppler studies, 178.12984, 178.12989


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Stroke occurs in 10%–12% of patients with sickle cell disease by the age of 20 years (1); the first episode usually occurs between the ages of 2 and 15 years (2). Most cerebral infarctions are associated with stenotic lesions that involve the junction of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) with the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) (15). This region is amenable to interrogation by using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography (US), and studies with both nonduplex and duplex Doppler US for the detection of intracranial vasculopathies have been published (14,69).

In a Medical College of Georgia study with 315 patients examined by using nonduplex TCD US, Adams et al (4) found that the patients with time-averaged maximum velocities (TAMVs) of 200 cm/sec or higher in the distal ICA, ACA-MCA bifurcation, or MCA had a markedly increased risk of stroke. Identification of this high-risk group allowed evaluation of chronic transfusion as a means of preventing initial stroke in the larger follow-up Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP) study, which involved 1,934 patients and had results that demonstrated a 92% decrease in the relative stroke rate in the treated group (1).

The results of this trial resulted in a clinical alert by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, which recommended TCD US screening in children with sickle cell disease. The authors were requested by pediatric hematologists to begin screening patients by using the STOP protocol, which we did by using power Doppler US. In this article we report our experience in implementing the nonduplex US STOP protocol, with duplex power Doppler US used to identify patients at high risk for stroke.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
During a 1-year period, 135 patients were referred from the pediatric sickle cell clinic in our institution and examined with duplex power TCD US. The results for 10 patients who did not meet the criteria for inclusion in the original STOP study were excluded. These included patients with a history of stroke (five patients), hemoglobin disease other than sickle cell anemia or sickle cell-ß thalassemia (four patients), and/or an age outside the range of 2–16 years (one patient). The results for the remaining 120 patients with sickle cell anemia and five patients with sickle cell-ß thalassemia were compared with those from the nonduplex US STOP study. Patients who were febrile, acutely ill, hypoxic, or asleep were not examined, because these conditions can artifactually elevate intracranial blood flow velocities (10).

The clinicians ordered magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR angiography for patients with abnormal TCD US results, when feasible, to correlate for evidence of vascular abnormality or ischemia, because these patients were candidates for chronic transfusion. MR imaging and MR angiography were ordered for eight of 10 patients with abnormal TCD studies. Because the US and MR studies were performed as a requested standard of clinical service care, pursuant to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute clinical alert, and the data were later collected through a review of records with patient anonymity protected, exemption of investigational review board approval was granted.

An Elegra unit (Siemens, Issaquah, Wash) and 2.5-MHz pulsed Doppler probe were used for all US studies. TCD US was performed by using power Doppler imaging with the STOP technique, which was adapted for duplex imaging (1,4). All studies were performed by sonographers who had attended workshops on the STOP technique, and they were supervised and the results interpreted by one of three radiologists (A.J.M., J.E.H.T., M.C.D.).

An acoustic window through the thin temporal bone was found for examination of the MCA, ACA, distal ICA and bifurcation, and posterior cerebral artery. The circle of Willis was identified at the level of the cerebral peduncles with power Doppler imaging. The most peripheral portion of the MCA was identified and velocity measurements were obtained with Doppler gate advancement in 2–3-mm increments. At the bifurcation, flow is bidirectional, with flow within the MCA toward and flow within the ACA away from the transducer. Measurements were made in both the ACA and the MCA portions of the bifurcation.

The gate was then advanced medially into the ACA, and measurements were taken. The bifurcation was again found, and the probe was angled slightly caudad to obtain measurements in the distal ICA, usually 4 mm proximal to the bifurcation. The probe was then angled posteriorly to evaluate the proximal posterior cerebral artery, with flow toward the transducer. The basilar artery was examined with the patient in the decubitus position, the neck flexed, and the probe angled through the foramen magnum in the midline. The vertebral arteries may be seen joining as they form the basilar artery at the medullopontine junction. From this position, flow in the basilar artery is away from the transducer.

We used color Doppler US for our studies initially but quickly switched to power Doppler US, because we found that it enabled us to visualize vessels much better. We used the same approach and vessels as those used in the STOP study, similar Doppler sample volumes (5 mm), and no angle correction (ie, 0°), because the nonduplex machines did not have angle correction capability. In all segments, particular attention was paid to recording the highest velocity obtained. If a patient underwent more than one examination during the study period, the highest value was used for classification, because the velocity measurement may be underestimated but should not be overestimated with no angle correction and declining velocities can represent stenoses exceeding critical levels (4,6).

We chose to manually measure the TAMV, as in the STOP study, to eliminate any changes that might be introduced by electronic wave-follower forms of measurement. As in the STOP study, the TAMV was measured by placing the cursor at a level such that a horizontal line through that level would make the area above the line and below the peak velocity envelope in systole equal to the area below the line and above the peak velocity envelope in diastole (Fig 1). Although our machine had no full-width horizontal cursor to facilitate measurement across several regular cardiac cycles, as in the STOP study, we found that in the majority of cases in which the TAMV was not near a cutoff point, we could place the short horizontal cursor and visually extend the line to accurately estimate the TAMV (Figs 2, 3). If the velocity was close to the abnormal cutoff point of 200 cm/sec, we zoomed the image to one on one on the workstation, filmed the zoomed image, and used a sharp film pencil to draw the horizontal line across all the cycles on the image to better visualize the correct level. These methods allowed us to avoid a possible problem associated with using electronic wave-follower measurement.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. TAMV graph. The TAMV is obtained when the area above the horizontal line at this level and below the peak systolic velocity (A1) equals the area below this line and above the peak diastolic velocity (A2). EDV = end-diastolic velocity, PSV = peak systolic velocity.

 


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Patient 8. (a) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the right distal ICA immediately below the bifurcation shows a normal TAMV, 100 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (b) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the left ICA-MCA junction shows an abnormal TAMV, 211 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). The cursor placement was slightly low and thus underestimated the abnormal TAMV. (c) Transverse collapsed image from a three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiogram (49.0/6.9, 25° flip angle, 512 x 224 matrix, 60 1-mm partitions) shows no stenosis of the right distal ICA (arrows) and severe stenosis of the left distal ICA (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Patient 8. (a) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the right distal ICA immediately below the bifurcation shows a normal TAMV, 100 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (b) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the left ICA-MCA junction shows an abnormal TAMV, 211 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). The cursor placement was slightly low and thus underestimated the abnormal TAMV. (c) Transverse collapsed image from a three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiogram (49.0/6.9, 25° flip angle, 512 x 224 matrix, 60 1-mm partitions) shows no stenosis of the right distal ICA (arrows) and severe stenosis of the left distal ICA (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. Patient 8. (a) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the right distal ICA immediately below the bifurcation shows a normal TAMV, 100 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (b) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the left ICA-MCA junction shows an abnormal TAMV, 211 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). The cursor placement was slightly low and thus underestimated the abnormal TAMV. (c) Transverse collapsed image from a three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiogram (49.0/6.9, 25° flip angle, 512 x 224 matrix, 60 1-mm partitions) shows no stenosis of the right distal ICA (arrows) and severe stenosis of the left distal ICA (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Patient 1. (a) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the right MCA shows a TAMV of 306 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (b) Transverse power Doppler US scan of the left MCA shows a TAMV of 309 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (c) Transverse collapsed image from a three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiogram (49.0/6.9, 25° flip angle, 512 x 224 matrix, 60 1-mm partitions) shows severe stenosis of the right MCA and moderate stenosis of the left MCA (straight arrows on the right and left sides, respectively), stenotic A-1 segment of the left ACA (wavy arrow), leptomeningeal collateral vessels (open arrows), and prominent lenticulostriate collateral vessels (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Patient 1. (a) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the right MCA shows a TAMV of 306 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (b) Transverse power Doppler US scan of the left MCA shows a TAMV of 309 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (c) Transverse collapsed image from a three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiogram (49.0/6.9, 25° flip angle, 512 x 224 matrix, 60 1-mm partitions) shows severe stenosis of the right MCA and moderate stenosis of the left MCA (straight arrows on the right and left sides, respectively), stenotic A-1 segment of the left ACA (wavy arrow), leptomeningeal collateral vessels (open arrows), and prominent lenticulostriate collateral vessels (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (179K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3c. Patient 1. (a) Transverse duplex power Doppler US scan of the right MCA shows a TAMV of 306 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (b) Transverse power Doppler US scan of the left MCA shows a TAMV of 309 cm/sec, as marked on the Doppler waveform by the small horizontal cursor (arrowhead). (c) Transverse collapsed image from a three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiogram (49.0/6.9, 25° flip angle, 512 x 224 matrix, 60 1-mm partitions) shows severe stenosis of the right MCA and moderate stenosis of the left MCA (straight arrows on the right and left sides, respectively), stenotic A-1 segment of the left ACA (wavy arrow), leptomeningeal collateral vessels (open arrows), and prominent lenticulostriate collateral vessels (arrowhead).

 
It is difficult, when interrogating these small vessels, particularly at higher velocities, to obtain a waveform with a "clean"—that is, dark—background without sacrificing, in our opinion, some of the higher frequency vascular signal. We therefore set the background slightly higher and "noisier" than that used in larger vessels but at a level at which the vascular signal could still be clearly distinguished visually from the background. In our experience, the wave-follower often captures some of this background noise well above the peak velocity and thus artificially increases the value, whereas decreasing the gain to obtain a clean waveform might cause the wave-follower to artificially underestimate the velocity. The gain was adjusted so that the background signal was present but the velocity signal was clearly separable; this was done to avoid underestimating the velocity by attempting to obtain a completely black (ie, clear) background.

The patients were classified as in the STOP study, as summarized in Table 1. Because the patients with abnormal results were candidates for chronic transfusion, which is not without risk, and there is some day-to-day variation in velocities, when the study results were abnormal, the patient returned in a week to confirm the abnormal value (1,4,11). Although two abnormal studies were required to confirm an abnormal case and thus make the patient a candidate for transfusion, these studies did not have to be consecutive. Patients who were classified as "conditional" (ie, with velocities >=170 cm/sec but not meeting abnormal criteria) were scheduled for follow-up at less than the 6-month screening interval—usually 2 months. If readable signals in both the right and left MCA and bifurcation could not be obtained, the study was classified as inadequate, and the patient was reexamined as soon as possible—the following week, if feasible. At least two sonographers attempted to obtain readable signals at any reattempted previously inadequate examination.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. TCD Findings: Classification and Follow-up

 
In eight patients with abnormal studies and one patient who had a normal study and subsequent stroke, MR imaging and MR angiography were performed by using a 1.5-T system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) with use of a quadrature head coil. MR imaging included sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo (400/minimum [repetition time msec/echo time], 5–6-mm sections, 1.0–1.5-mm intersection gap, 256 x 192 matrix), transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo (3,000–5,000/105, 256 x 192 matrix, 5–6-mm sections, 1.0–1.5-mm intersection gap, two signals acquired), transverse fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (8,000/140, 2,000-msec inversion time, 5-mm sections, 1.5-mm intersection gap, 256 x 160 matrix), and transverse gradient-recalled-echo (180/30, 15° flip angle, 5-mm sections, 1.5-mm intersection gap, 256 x 192 matrix) sequences. Two patients underwent transverse echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (10,000/95; diffusion-weighted factor b, 1,000 sec/mm2; one signal acquired).

MR angiography involved transverse three-dimensional time-of-flight imaging with a spoiled gradient-echo sequence (49.0/6.9, 25° flip angle, 512 x 224 matrix), first-order flow compensation, and superior and inferior saturation pulses. Sixty 1-mm-thick partitions were acquired. Maximum intensity projection was used to create collapsed transverse images and coronal projection images. To avoid the possible problems related to maximum intensity projection imaging, individual partitions were reviewed in each case (7). All MR studies were reviewed by a single neuroradiologist (G.S.D.) without knowledge of the Doppler US findings. Clinical follow-up was supervised by two pediatric hematologists (R.V.I., M.G.S.).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Of the 125 patients examined with duplex TCD US, 10 (8.0%) were classified as abnormal cases. Five patients had abnormal findings on only one side, and five had abnormal findings on both sides. Sixteen (12.8%) patients were classified as having conditional studies; 91 (72.8%), normal studies; and eight (6.4%), inadequate studies. When the percentages of patients in the described TCD categories were compared among the present duplex TCD US, Medical College of Georgia nonduplex US, and STOP nonduplex US studies (Table 2), the percentage of patients in the abnormal group in the duplex TCD study was similar to those in the two nonduplex studies, with the percentages of patients in the normal and conditional groups in the duplex power Doppler study intermediate between the percentages of those groups in the MCG and STOP studies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Duplex Power Doppler US versus Two Nonduplex TCD Imaging Studies: Classification Results

 
Of the eight patients who had abnormal TCD results and underwent MR imaging and MR angiography (Table 3), six had abnormalities at MR imaging. All six of these patients had changes of chronic ischemia or infarction, as evidenced by a well-defined zone of increased signal intensity at intermediate-weighted, T2-weighted, or FLAIR imaging, with or without an associated cystic change in a vascular distribution involving the gray or white matter. If the chronic changes were of sufficient degree, associated signs of shrunken gyri, enlarged sulci, or ventricular dilatation were noted. No associated mass effect indicative of acute infarction—that is, parenchymal or gyral swelling—was seen. However, one of the six patients (patient 10, Table 3) had a small, acute subcortical infarct at echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging that was not suspected clinically, and another of the six (patient 1, Table 3) had a clinical stroke after undergoing MR imaging but before transfusion therapy began. One of the two patients who underwent echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (patient 9, Table 3) had normal MR imaging findings.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Abnormal TCD US Results and MR Imaging-MR Angiography Correlation

 
All eight patients who had abnormal TCD US results and underwent MR imaging and MR angiography had abnormal MR angiographic findings. The abnormal vascular findings at MR angiography included stenoses, leptomeningeal collateral vessels, and lenticulostriate collateral vessels. The MR angiographic abnormalities were bilateral in the four patients who had bilateral TCD US findings. The MR angiographic abnormalities were bilateral also in three of the four patients with unilateral abnormal TCD US findings. In the fourth patient, the stenosis seen at MR angiography was on the opposite side (which had a conditional velocity of 175 cm/sec).

All eight patients with abnormal TCD US and MR angiographic findings were started on transfusion therapy. Two of the patients with abnormal velocities were started on transfusion therapy on the basis of TCD US findings alone and did not undergo MR studies. One patient with high normal velocities had a stroke 31/2 months after his imaging studies. MR imaging depicted chronic right periventricular ishcemic changes and an acute right midfrontal gyrus infarct in the anterior cerebral arterial distribution. MR angiography depicted mild stenoses of the left proximal MCA and right proximal ACA.

At follow-up, one (0.8%) patient with a high normal velocity (167 cm/sec) had a stroke 31/2 months after his initial study; results of the repeat study performed at the time of the stroke revealed a velocity of 171 cm/sec. At the time this article was written, no patients with conditional velocities had had a stroke. One patient with abnormal velocities had a stroke between the time of TCD US and the initiation of transfusion therapy. At the time of this writing, the status of two patients with conditional velocities had progressed such that they had abnormal velocities at follow-up. One patient with two inadequate studies had a stroke 12 months after his last TCD US study. At the time of this writing, our follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months, and no other strokes had occurred.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The majority of strokes that occur in children with sickle cell anemia are cerebral infarctions that are related to stenotic lesions caused by intimal proliferation of fibroblasts and smooth muscle, which are sometimes accompanied by thrombi (2,4,7). This intimal abnormality may reflect a combination of high-velocity blood flow in these patients, rigidity of circulating red blood cells, adherence of the red blood cells to the vessel walls, and intravascular sludging (12). The majority of these stenoses involve the distal intracranial ICA and the proximal MCA and ACA (15). These lesions may progress for months or years before symptoms develop, allowing the opportunity to detect them before a clinical stroke occurs (4,13,14).

TCD US findings associated with cerebrovascular disease in patients with sickle cell anemia have been described by several authors (3,69,15). Seibert et al (16) reported nine TCD US findings associated with cerebrovascular disease in sickle cell disease. To our knowledge, Adams et al (3,6,10,17) were among the first investigators to use nonduplex Doppler US to examine patients with sickle cell disease and thereby define the expected blood flow velocity values in children without known cerebrovascular disease, report elevated velocities in patients with angiographically proved lesions, and demonstrate the effectiveness of nonduplex Doppler US in screening for cerebrovascular disease. Expanding on an earlier study, Adams et al (4) reported on a Medical College of Georgia prospective study of nonduplex Doppler US performed in 315 children who had sickle cell anemia or sickle cell-ß thalassemia without a history of stroke at entry. With a 40–60-month follow-up, patients with blood flow velocities lower than 170 cm/sec in all vessels had a 2% risk of subsequent stroke and were later designated the "normal" group. Those patients with velocities of 170 cm/sec or higher in any vessel but lower than 200 cm/sec in the distal ICA or MCA had a 7% risk of subsequent stroke and were designated the "conditional" group. Those with velocities of 200 cm/sec or higher in the distal ICA or MCA were noted to have a 40% incidence of stroke at follow-up and designated the "abnormal" group. Identification of the latter, high-risk group made possible the evaluation of periodic blood transfusions for prevention of initial strokes; this treatment had been shown to greatly reduce the incidence of recurrent strokes (18,19). The results of STOP demonstrated a 92% difference in the rate of initial stroke between patients with abnormal velocities who received transfusions and those with abnormal velocities who did not (1). This finding led to early termination of the trial and the issuance of a clinical alert by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, in which TCD screening in children aged 2–16 years with sickle cell disease and without a history of stroke was recommended (20).

We expect the TAMV measurement method described herein to be new to many radiologists (21,22). We used this method because it was used in the STOP study, which produced the velocities used to classify the patients, and it has not yet been shown that these values are valid with wave-follower forms of measurement. In addition, as mentioned earlier, early in our experience, while using both forms of measurement, we noted problems with the wave-follower capturing signals clearly above the velocity envelope; this was possibly related to the relatively high gain settings used for these studies.

Although a full-width horizontal cursor, as is available on nonduplex STOP machines, would be ideal, our method of visually extending the level of the short cursor works well when the TAMV is not near a cutoff point for abnormal values. When the TAMV is near a cutoff point, the method used in the STOP study—that of a full-width horizontal cursor across several regular cardiac cycles—can be reproduced by filming the image and drawing a horizontal line (Fig 1) with a sharp film pencil. Although the 200 cm/sec mark is always present on our scale, for the conditional cutoff point of 170 cm/sec or other values that are not precisely marked on the scale that may be used in the future, the small cursor can be set at the desired value, the image filmed, and the relationship of the drawn line to the cursor ascertained. Although we did not have nonduplex machines for direct comparison, side-by-side comparisons of velocity values obtained in the same patient with both nonduplex and duplex machines by using both manual and wave-follower measurement methods would be ideal to evaluate any differences. Future inclusion of a full-width horizontal cursor on the duplex machines used by most radiologists would be extremely helpful.

MR imaging findings in sickle cell disease, both in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, have been reported (79,13,16,2326). Some investigators have reported that lesions at MR imaging in asymptomatic patients are associated with a high incidence of subsequent stroke (24). Although six (75%) of eight patients with abnormal TCD US findings in our study had abnormalities at MR imaging, in the original STOP study, only 44 (35%) of 127 patients who had abnormal TCD findings had abnormal MR imaging findings (1).

Results of previous reports (7,25) have shown good correlation between MR angiography and angiography in symptomatic patients with sickle cell disease. Seibert et al (16) reported a strong correlation between a combination of both positive TCD findings and positive MR angiographic findings, and subsequent stroke, whereas a negative MR angiogram was associated with a low risk of subsequent stroke. Data obtained by Abboud et al (27) from follow-up of children in the STOP trial who underwent MR studies suggest that TCD US is more sensitive than MR angiography in enabling the identification of children with sickle cell disease who are at risk for stroke. Although they noted that the patients with normal MR angiograms or mild abnormalities at MR angiography were more likely to have resolved abnormal TCD findings at follow-up than were the patients with moderate to severe stenoses or occlusions, three of nine patients with abnormal TCD US scans and subsequent stroke had initially normal MR angiograms. Therefore, more data on the follow-up of larger numbers of patients who undergo MR angiography seem to be necessary to determine whether MR angiography can be helpful in further quantifying the risk of stroke in these patients. The fact that all of the MR angiographic studies performed in our study patients with abnormal TCD US scans were abnormal supports the theory that these patients are at high risk for subsequent stroke. The clinical stroke that occurred in one patient between the time of TCD US, MR imaging, and MR angiography and the beginning of transfusion, as well as the subclinical acute infarct noted on the MR image in another patient, further confirms the high-risk nature of this group.

As noted earlier, one of the patients with all velocities lower than 170 cm/sec had a subsequent stroke. The causes for this false-negative case might be technical error in the TCD US study, artery-to-artery embolism from abnormal intima (4,24) without hemodynamically significant stenosis, or small-vessel disease, which are believed to be causes of stroke in such patients (2426). Although we are currently scheduling follow-up studies at 2-month intervals for the patients with conditional velocities, this protocol would be expensive over time, and patient compliance with these short-term follow-up appointments has been a problem. Results of further follow-up of these patients may demonstrate a longer interval at which these patients—particularly those with velocities in the lower conditional range—can be safely followed up. Alternatively, if further study results indicate that MR angiographic findings strongly correlate with subsequent risk of stroke, selective use of MR angiography in patients with conditional velocities might obviate further short-term follow-up.

One of the eight patients with inadequate studies subsequently had a clinical stroke. Although poor penetration of the skull by the ultrasound beam may be a cause of inadequate studies, this is relatively unusual in children (6), and in our study, we were able to visualize the brain parenchyma with varying amounts of vascular flow at power Doppler imaging in six (75%) of eight patients in whom an adequate study ultimately could not be obtained, including the patient with the subsequent stroke. The inability to find vascular signals for one or more vessels with nonduplex equipment or the lack of depiction of a vessel with visualization of the brain parenchyma or other vessels with duplex equipment has been reported in symptomatic patients with vascular occlusion (3,15) and in asymptomatic patients who later developed symptoms (4). One of the patients classified as a normal case in the Medical College of Georgia study had no vascular signals of the ICA or MCA on one side and later had a clinical stroke (4). (Inadequate classification was not used in the MCG study.) Therefore, we believe that a patient with an inadequate study, especially when there is visualization of the brain parenchyma or other vessels, should be considered for other studies, such as MR imaging or MR angiography.

Power Doppler US has been reported to be superior to conventional color Doppler US in the depiction of intracranial vessels and able to depict vessels relatively independent of the angle of the vessel to the US beam (28,29). This was also our experience. From the examiner’s point of view, we found that the excellent depiction of the circle of Willis afforded by power Doppler US allowed quick orientation to the vessels and rapid, confident placement of the sample volume. Therefore, the learning curve was relatively short. In addition, in some patients, the locus of increased velocity was quite short, and it was possible to pass over it without realizing it. The images from previous studies, with the excellent vascular visualization enabled by using power Doppler US in documenting a site of previous concern, allows these areas of concern to be confidently identified for careful repeat examination and optimal measurement.

Our experience indicates that by adhering carefully to the techniques of the STOP protocol, the results can be duplicated by using duplex power Doppler US, with the added benefits of excellent vascular visualization. We believe that in addition to paying meticulous attention to technique, it is important to maintain a database of the patients examined, which includes a record of velocities, classifications, MR findings, and clinical follow-up, both to monitor results and for possible use as other criteria are found to be useful.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Paige Mason, RT, RDMS, Melissa Mabry, RT, RDMS, and Becky Berry RT, RDMS, RVT, whose dedication was essential to this study, and Tonya Leamond, RN, for her invaluable help with the clinical follow-up.


    FOOTNOTES
 
2 Current address: Department of Radiology, St Dominic Hospital, Jackson, Miss. Back

Abbreviations: ACA = anterior cerebral artery, ICA = internal carotid artery, MCA = middle cerebral artery, STOP = Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia, TAMV = time-averaged maximum velocity, TCD = transcranial Doppler

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, A.J.M.; study concepts and design, all authors; literature research, A.J.M.; clinical studies, A.J.M., J.E.H.T., M.C.D., R.V.I., M.G.S.; data acquisition, A.J.M.; data analysis/interpretation, A.J.M., J.E.H.T., M.C.D.; manuscript preparation, A.J.M., J.E.H.T., M.C.D.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, all authors; manuscript editing, A.J.M.; manuscript revision/review, all authors; manuscript final version approval, all authors.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Adams RJ, McKie VC, Hsu L, et al. Prevention of a first stroke by transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal results on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:5-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Huttenlocher PR, Moohr JW, Johns L, Brown FD. Cerebral blood flow in sickle cell cerbrovascular disease. Pediatrics 1984; 73:615-621.[Medline]
  3. Adams RJ, Nichols FT, Figueroa R, McKie V, Lott T. Transcranial Doppler correlation with cerebral angiography in sickle cell disease. Stroke 1992; 23:1073-1077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Adams RJ, McKie VC, Carl EM, et al. Long-term stroke risk in children with sickle cell disease screened with transcranial Doppler. Ann Neurol 1977; 42:699-704.
  5. Stockman JA, Nigro MA, Mishkin MM, Oski FA. Occlusion of large cerebral vessels in sickle-cell anemia. N Engl J Med 1972; 287:846-849.
  6. Adams RJ, Nichols FT, Aaslid R, et al. Cerebral vessel stenosis in sickle cell disease: criteria for detection by transcranial Doppler. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1990; 12:277-282.[Medline]
  7. Seibert J, Miller SF, Kirby RS, et al. Cerebrovascular disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with sickle cell anemia: screening with duplex transcranial Doppler US—correlation with MR imaging and MR angiography. Radiology 1993; 189:457-466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Siegel MJ, Luker GD, Glauser TA, DeBaun MR. Cerebral infarction in sickle cell disease: transcranial Doppler US versus neurologic examination. Radiology 1995; 197:191-194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kogutt MS, Goldwag SS, Gupta KL, Kaneko K, Humbert JR. Correlation of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography with MR and MRA in the evaluation of sickle cell disease patients with prior stroke. Pediatr Radiol 1994; 24:204-206.[Medline]
  10. Adams R, McKie V, Nichols F, et al. The use of transcranial ultrasonography to predict stroke in sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:605-610.[Abstract]
  11. Sortenberg W, Langmoen IA, Lindegaard KF, Nornes H. Side-to-side differences and day-to-day variations of transcranial Doppler parameters in normal subjects. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9:403-409.[Abstract]
  12. Mohr JP. Sickle cell anemia, stroke, and transcranial Doppler studies. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:637-638.[Medline]
  13. Moser FG, Miller ST, Bello JA, et al. The spectrum of brain MR abnormalities in sickle-cell disease: a report from the cooperative study of sickle cell disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17:965-972.[Abstract]
  14. Adams RJ, McKie VC, Brambilla D, et al. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia. Control Clin Trials 1997; 12:110-129.
  15. Verlhac S, Bernaudin F, Tortat D, et al. Detection of cerebrovascular disease in patients with sickle cell disease using transcranial Doppler sonography: correlation with MR, MRA and conventional angiography. Pediatr Radiol 1995; 25:S14-S19.
  16. Seibert JJ, Glasier CM, Kirby RS, et al. Transcranial Doppler, MRA, and MR as a screening examination for cerebrovascular disease in patients with sickle cell anemia: an 8-year study. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28:138-142.[Medline]
  17. Adams RJ, Nichols FT, McKie VC, et al. Transcranial Doppler: influence of hematocrit in children with sickle cell anemia without stroke. J Cardiovasc Tech 1989; 8:97-101.
  18. Pegelow CH, Adams RJ, McKie V, et al. Risk of recurrent stroke in patients with sickle cell disease treated with erythrocyte transfusions. J Pediatr 1995; 126:896-899.[Medline]
  19. Russell MO, Goldberg HI, Hodson A, et al. Effect of transfusion therapy on arteriographic abnormalities and on recurrence of stroke in sickle cell disease. Blood 1984; 63:162-169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. . Clinical alert: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Bethesda, Md: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 1997.
  21. Bode H. Introduction to Doppler sonography In: Pediatric applications of transcranial Doppler sonography. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1988; 11-15.
  22. McCartney JP, Thomas-Lukes KM, Gomez CR. Doppler basics In: Handbook of transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1997; 14-34.
  23. Gammal TE, Adams RJ, Nichols FT, et al. MR and CT investigation of cerebrovascular disease in sickle cell patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986; 7:1043-1049.[Abstract]
  24. Kugler S, Anderson B, Cross D, et al. Abnormal cranial magnetic resonance imaging scans in sickle-cell disease. Arch Neurol 1993; 50:629-635.[Abstract]
  25. Wiznitzer M, Ruggieri PM, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Modic MT, Berman B. Diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease in sickle cell anemia by magnetic resonance angiography. J Pediatr 1990; 117:551-555.[Medline]
  26. Pavlakis SG, Bello J, Prohovnik I, et al. Brain infarction in sickle cell anemia: magnetic resonance imaging correlates. Ann Neurol 1988; 23:125-130.[Medline]
  27. Abboud MR, Cure J, Gallagher D, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in children with abnormal TCD in the STOP study (abstr).; From the 23rd Annual Meeting of the National Sickle Cell Disease Program, 1999; 49..
  28. Griewing B, Doherty C, Kessler C. Power Doppler ultrasound examination of the intracerebral and extracerebral vasculature. J Neuroimaging 1996; 6:32-35.[Medline]
  29. Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL, Bree RL, Adler RS. Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency–based color Doppler US. Radiology 1994; 190:853-856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Krejza, W. Rudzinski, M.A. Pawlak, M. Tomaszewski, R. Ichord, J. Kwiatkowski, D. Gor, and E.R. Melhem
Angle-Corrected Imaging Transcranial Doppler Sonography versus Imaging and Nonimaging Transcranial Doppler Sonography in Children with Sickle Cell Disease
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2007; 28(8): 1613 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. K. Oguz, X. Golay, F. B. Pizzini, C. A. Freer, N. Winrow, R. Ichord, J. F. Casella, P. C. M. van Zijl, and E. R. Melhem
Sickle Cell Disease: Continuous Arterial Spin-labeling Perfusion MR Imaging in Children
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 567 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malouf, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malouf, A. J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE