Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lingawi, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lingawi, S. S.
(Radiology. 2001;219:366-367.)
© RSNA, 2001


Signs in Imaging

The Naked Facet Sign1

Sattam S. Lingawi, MD, FRCPC

1 From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Center, University of British Columbia, Canada. Received December 6, 1998; revision requested February 15, 1999; final revision received September 20; accepted September 29. Address correspondence to the author, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, PO Box 80215, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia (e-mail: tersam2@yahoo.com).

Index terms: Signs in Imaging • Spine, CT, 318.1211 • Spine, dislocation, 318.421 • Spine, facet joints, 314.421 • Spine, injuries, 318.421


    APPEARANCE
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The naked facet sign refers to the computed tomographic (CT) appearance of uncovered articulating processes (Fig 1) (1,2). On transverse CT scans, the involved level will reveal bilateral solitary nonarticulating facets with loss of the joint space.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. (a) Lateral radiograph of the cervical spine shows anterior subluxation of C4 on C5 associated with posterior widening of the disk and interspinous space, as well as uncovering of the articulating processes (wide straight arrow). Also note the fracture of the C6 superior facet (curved arrow), with anterior displacement of the fracture fragment (thin arrow). (b) Transverse CT scan obtained at the level of the upper body of C5 reveals uncovered (naked) C5 superior articulating processes (wide solid arrows) and a C4 anterior subluxation (open arrow). Also note the C5 posterior cortex avulsion fracture (thin solid arrow).

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. (a) Lateral radiograph of the cervical spine shows anterior subluxation of C4 on C5 associated with posterior widening of the disk and interspinous space, as well as uncovering of the articulating processes (wide straight arrow). Also note the fracture of the C6 superior facet (curved arrow), with anterior displacement of the fracture fragment (thin arrow). (b) Transverse CT scan obtained at the level of the upper body of C5 reveals uncovered (naked) C5 superior articulating processes (wide solid arrows) and a C4 anterior subluxation (open arrow). Also note the C5 posterior cortex avulsion fracture (thin solid arrow).

 

    EXPLANATION
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The facet joints (apophyseal joints) are normally symmetrically and uniformly superimposed and kept in fixed relation, with minimal physiologic movement in both flexion and extension positions. The supraspinous and interspinous ligaments, the ligamentum flavum, and the facet joint capsule maintain this anatomic relation. The anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments mainly maintain the vertebral body alignment; they may also play an indirect role in facet joint stability (3). In severe flexion-distraction injury of the spine, disruption of these ligamentous structures occurs with or without fractures. This results in anterior subluxation of the vertebra, with widening of the facet joints and uncovering of the articulating processes. The superior and inferior articulating facets lie "naked."


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Since conventional radiography remains the main and first-line modality in investigating spinal injury, one must be familiar with the various conventional radiographic signs of spinal injury. Green et al (3) have listed the radiographic signs of flexion injury in order from the most common to the least common. The findings include localized hyperkyphosis, anterior subluxation of the vertebra, widening of the disk space posteriorly, wedge fracture of the anterosuperior portion of the vertebra below, distraction of the facet joints, and fanning of the spinous processes. The recognition of these radiographic findings is crucial for early diagnosis, since delayed instability is the most common (20%) and clinically substantial complication following flexion injuries.

Transverse CT imaging with sagittal and coronal reconstruction offers a comprehensive demonstration of osseous and soft-tissue injuries, with accurate depiction of both the anterior and posterior elements of the vertebrae, the vertebral element alignment, and the degree of spinal canal compromise (4). Anterior subluxation of vertebral bodies usually occurs as a result of an excessive flexion force that causes disruption of the ligamentous complex that stabilizes the facet joint. Consequently, the superior vertebra undergoes forward subluxation, with anterior displacement of the corresponding inferior articulating facet on the superior articulating facet of the vertebra below. This results in uncovering of the articulating facet surfaces (Fig 2). The degree of facet uncovering could be partial (subluxed facets) or complete (perched facets). Further flexion forces can transform perched facets into a facet lock. In such situations, the transverse CT image will reveal the reversed relation between the facet joints where the inferior facets of the vertebra above are displaced anterior to the superior facet of the vertebra below (back-to-back apposition). A lateral radiograph of the spine will reveal the reversed relation of the facet joints and an anterior subluxation of more than 50% of the superior vertebral body.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. (a) Schematic representation of perched facets resulting in the CT naked facet sign (level A), in comparison with normal facet alignment (level B). Normal articulating processes are indicated by arrows, while naked facets are indicated by arrowheads. (b) Normal articulating processes at facet joints at C4 through C5 (in a different patient). Compare this image with the diagram in a.

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. (a) Schematic representation of perched facets resulting in the CT naked facet sign (level A), in comparison with normal facet alignment (level B). Normal articulating processes are indicated by arrows, while naked facets are indicated by arrowheads. (b) Normal articulating processes at facet joints at C4 through C5 (in a different patient). Compare this image with the diagram in a.

 
The naked facet sign was originally used in the setting of flexion fracture of the thoracolumbar junction, with distraction of the lower thoracic facets (1). Despite the differences in the normal facet alignment between the thoracolumbar junction and the cervical spine, the use of this sign has been extended to the evaluation of cervical vertebrae that undergo facet uncovering due to similar mechanisms (2,5).

Study findings by Yetkin et al (6) suggest a correlation between the presence of facet distraction and facet fracture or lock at the same or adjacent level. These are often associated with a rotational element, particularly if the mechanism of injury is a unilateral process. It has been previously reported (7) that 73% of unilateral facet dislocations are associated with fractures of the involved articular processes. This is crucial for patient care, since it implies spinal instability (5). Facet dislocation with the presence or absence of fracture is best evaluated by using thin-section helical CT with two-dimensional reconstruction.

In summary, the naked facet sign is a characteristic CT finding of flexion-distraction injury of the spine and indicates severe ligamentous disruption and spinal instability.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
I acknowledge the help of Jiri Dubec, MD, in the preparation of the medical illustration presented in this manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
A trainee (resident or fellow) wishing to submit a manuscript for Signs in Imaging should first write to the Editor for approval of the sign to be prepared, to avoid duplicate preparation of the same sign.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. O’Callaghan JP, Ullrich CG, Yuan HA, Kieffer SA. CT of facet distraction in flexion injuries of the thoracolumbar spine: the "naked" facet. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1980; 1:97-102.
  2. Castillo M, Harris JH, Jr. Imaging of the spine: a teaching file Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1998; 203-204.
  3. Green JD, Harle TS, Harris JH, Jr. Anterior subluxation of the cervical spine: hyperflexion sprain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1981; 2:243-250.[Abstract]
  4. Gellad FE, Levine AM, Joslyn JN, Edwards CC, Bosse M. Pure thoracolumbar facet dislocation: clinical features and CT appearance. Radiology 1986; 161:505-508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Harris JH, Jr, Mirvis SE. The radiology of acute cervical spine trauma 3rd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1996; 290-319.
  6. Yetkin Z, Osborn AG, Giles DS, Haughton VM. Uncovertebral and facet joint dislocation in cervical articular pillar fractures: CT evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1985; 6:633-637.[Abstract]
  7. Shanmubanathan K, Mirvis SE, Levine AM. Rotational injury of cervical facets: CT analysis of fracture patterns with implications for management and neurologic outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:1165-1169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. J. Roche, D. P. O'Keeffe, W. K. Lee, V. A. Duddalwar, W. C. Torreggiani, and J. M. Curtis
Selections from the Buffet of Food Signs in Radiology
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1369 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lingawi, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lingawi, S. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE