|
|
||||||||
Signs in Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Medical System, Box 170, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Received April 9, 1999; revision requested May 21; revision received October 11; accepted October 21. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: dgp2p@virginia.edu).
Index terms: Knee, injuries, 452.419, 4526.4857 Knee, ligaments, menisci, and cartilage, 4526.4857 Knee, radiography, 4526.11, 458.11 Signs in Imaging
| APPEARANCE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| EXPLANATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An abnormally deep lateral condylopatellar sulcus has been attributed to an impacted osteochondral fracture (2). A localized chondral or transchondral abnormality overlying the lateral condylopatellar sulcus has been observed with a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during surgical reconstruction and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the knee (24).
The most common mechanism of an ACL tear is rotation and valgus stress (4). Disruption of the ACL with valgus stress causes the posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau and the middle to anterior portion of the lateral femoral condyle to forcefully impact against one another. This causes a pattern of injuries known as "kissing contusions," which are usually radiographically occult injuries to the cartilage and bone demonstrated as bone contusions at MR imaging (Fig 2).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using this method of measuring the sulcus, Warren et al (3) compared the depth of the sulcus in patients with and those without ACL tears. They found that only one (2%) of 47 patients with clinically intact ACLs had a sulcus greater than 1.0 mm in depth. In contrast, two (4%) of 52 patients with acute ACL tears and 13 (13%) of 101 patients with chronic ACL tears had a sulcus greater than or equal to 1.5 mm in depth. The authors concluded that a lateral femoral notch greater than 2.0 mm in depth was highly suggestive of an ACL injury but that the lateral femoral notch sign was an inconstant finding in ACLdeficient knees.
Using the same method of measuring the sulcus, Cobby et al (2) found a clinically substantial difference in the mean depth of the sulcus between patients with and those without ACL tears. In the 62 patients with clinically and/or arthroscopically confirmed normal ACLs, the mean depth was 0.45 mm, with a range of 01.2 mm. In 41 patients with confirmed ACL tears, the mean depth was 0.89 mm, with a range of 05.0 mm. Five (12%) of the patients with ACL tears had a sulcus larger than 1.5 mm in depth, and one (2%) of these five patients had a 5-mm-depressed angulated fracture at the sulcus. They concluded that a sulcus deeper than 1.5 mm, which was equivalent to 3 SDs larger than the mean, was a reliable indirect conventional radiographic sign of a torn ACL.
There are few findings suggestive of an ACL tear on conventional radiographs of the knee. Five characteristic fractures on radiographs that have a high association with a torn ACL are the following: (a) avulsion fracture of the lateral tibial rim (Segond fracture), (b) avulsion fracture of the tibial spine, (c) avulsion fracture of the posteromedial tibial plateau, (d) posterior fracture of the lateral tibial plateau, and (e) the lateral femoral notch sign (2,57). The lateral femoral notch sign and posterior fracture of the lateral tibial plateau are infrequently seen radiographic signs corresponding to the kissing contusions seen at MR imaging.
An impaction fracture of the lateral femoral condyle with sufficient depression could be apparent on the lateral radiograph of the knee as the lateral femoral notch sign. However, a limitation of this sign remains the difficulty in distinguishing a prominent but normal lateral condylopatellar sulcus and a shallow impacted fracture at the sulcus. Although the lateral femoral notch sign is a highly infrequent finding in patients with ACL tears, an abnormally deep lateral condylopatellar sulcus is highly suggestive of a torn ACL. It is important to carefully search for the lateral femoral notch sign and to recognize its importance so that further evaluation with MR imaging can be performed to confirm the presence of an associated ACL tear.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
A trainee (resident or fellow) wishing to submit a manuscript for Signs in Imaging should first write to the Editor for approval of the sign to be prepared, to avoid duplicate preparation of the same sign.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Prince, T. Laor, and J. A. Bean MRI of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Associated Findings in the Pediatric Knee: Changes with Skeletal Maturation Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 756 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Hall Radiographic Features of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 576 - 576. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |