Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 1, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2212001606
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2212001606v1
221/2/301    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Saden, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Saden, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. D.
(Radiology. 2001;221:301-308.)
© RSNA, 2001


Neuroradiology

Imaging of the Internal Carotid Artery: The Dilemma of Total versus Near Total Occlusion1

Suzie M. El-Saden, MD, Edward G. Grant, MD, Gasser M. Hathout, MD, Peter T. Zimmerman, MD, Stanley N. Cohen, MD and J. Dennis Baker, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (S.M.E., E.G.G., G.M.H., P.T.Z.), Neurology (S.N.C.), and Surgery (J.D.B.), West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received October 2, 2000; revision requested November 15; revision received February 27, 2001; accepted March 30. Address correspondence to S.M.E. (e-mail: sels@mednet.ucla.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To evaluate ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the differentiation between occlusion and near occlusion of internal carotid artery (ICA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with occlusion or near occlusion of ICA at catheter angiography and who underwent MR angiography and US were included. MR angiography and US were compared with catheter angiography, the standard, for the ability to help distinguish occlusion from near occlusion. Noninvasive examinations were evaluated for the ability to classify near occlusions as having severe focal stenosis with distal luminal collapse versus diffuse nonfocal disease. The 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS: In 55 of 274 patients with 548 ICAs, catheter angiography depicted 37 total occlusions and 21 near occlusions. US depicted all total occlusions; MR angiography depicted 34 (92%) (95% CI: 0.78, 0.98). US depicted 18 (86%) of 21 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.97) near occlusions; MR angiography depicted all (100%). Of 18 vessels that were determined to be patent at US, 17 (94%) (95% CI: 0.73, 0.99) were classified as having focal stenosis or diffuse disease. Because flow gaps were identified in vessels with focal and diffuse disease, MR angiography was not effective in helping to differentiate these lesions.

CONCLUSION: Assuming US is the initial imaging examination, when occlusion is diagnosed, MR angiography can depict it. If occlusion is confirmed, no further imaging is necessary. US performed well in helping to differentiate vessels with focal severe stenosis from those with diffuse disease. MR angiography added little in this group. Catheter angiography remains beneficial for vessels with diffuse nonfocal narrowing.

Index terms: Angiography, comparative studies, 172.12142, 172.1245, 172.12981, 172.12983 • Carotid arteries, angiography, 172.12142, 172.12143, 172.1245, 172.12981, 172.12983 • Carotid arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 172.721


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Accurate distinction of internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion from near occlusion is often difficult. The distinction, however, is critical, because there are important implications for therapeutic management and clinical outcome. As long as the ICA lumen is patent, symptomatic patients are at high risk for embolic stroke. To a large extent, the risk of stroke and the benefit of surgery stratify in proportion to the degree of stenosis (1,2). With stenosis in the range of 90%–94%, there was a 35% risk of stroke at 1 year for medically treated patients, compared with an 8.7% risk for those who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) (3). Although to our knowledge there is little available literature on patients with near occlusion (lesions with stenosis greater than 94%), the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, or NASCET, revealed that stroke risk decreases but remains significant at 11.1% per year, which approximates that of patients having 70%–89% stenosis (3). Patients with complete ICA occlusion are at minimal risk for embolic phenomena, and continued symptoms in this situation may be related to hemispheric hypoperfusion, in which case medical therapy is usually maximized (4). These patients are generally not candidates for CEA.

The optimum algorithm for performing imaging in patients with high-grade stenosis remains controversial, with increasing numbers of patients being referred directly for CEA on the basis of ultrasonographic (US) results alone. Magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and/or conventional angiography are often added to the work-up (5). However, patients with occlusion versus those with near occlusion (also termed pseudo-occlusion, preocclusive stenosis, or string sign) (3,69) represent a diagnostic dilemma in that the ability of US and/or MR angiography to help differentiate these two entities has not been definitively established. Catheter angiography is still considered by many to be the standard for helping to distinguish occlusion from near occlusion, but it carries the usual risks associated with such invasive procedures (10).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the individual performance of US and MR angiography in the examination of patients with complete versus those with near occlusion of the ICA by using conventional angiography as the standard.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A retrospective review of all carotid catheter angiograms obtained between October 1992 and the present was undertaken. ICAs with either a complete or near occlusion were identified. From this group, vessels in which US, MR angiography, and catheter angiography were performed within 3 months of each other were selected and comprised our study population. Vessels were eliminated if an intervening CEA was performed. Noninvasive studies were always performed prior to angiography. For this study, results of US and MR angiography were based on the original report made by the radiologist at the time of the study in an attempt to limit bias that may have been inherent in a retrospective study.

Catheter Angiography
Digital subtraction angiography was performed in all patients by using selective injections in the common carotid artery. A minimum of two views of the common carotid artery bifurcation were obtained, but often, more than two were necessary to image the proximal ICA optimally. Delayed imaging and prolonged injections were performed in all patients. Our technique consisted of an exposure rate of one image per second for up to 20 seconds and a manual injection volume of up to 20 mL of contrast material (Isovue 300 [iopamidol]; Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ). The images were reviewed by two neuroradiologists (S.M.E., G.M.H.), and the results were determined in consensus.

For this study, an occlusion was diagnosed when the ICA was found to terminate anywhere along its course. A near occlusion was diagnosed when the ICA lumen was smaller at its widest diameter than the ipsilateral internal maxillary artery (11) and/or demonstrated delayed filling relative to the ipsilateral external carotid artery. Patent vessels were further classified as having luminal atrophy or being collapsed beyond a proximal extremely high-grade stenosis or having diffuse disease or classic string signs, which had a collapsed lumen throughout their course and no obvious area of focal narrowing at or near the bifurcation.

Ultrasonography
All patients underwent gray-scale color and spectral Doppler US in a single facility accredited by the American College of Radiology. After 1994, power Doppler US was included in all examinations in which occlusion was suspected at the time of the examination. Commercially available US units (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, Wash, and Acuson, Mountain View, Calif) were used for all examinations. US examinations were performed in accordance with an established laboratory protocol.

The presence of flow was assessed by using all available techniques. Inability to identify flow in the ICA was taken to imply occlusion. Only the inframandibular portions of the ICA could be directly evaluated at US. Absent diastolic flow at spectral Doppler US in an otherwise patent cervical ICA lumen was taken to imply a possible distal occlusion (12). The color and power Doppler US appearances of the arterial lumen were observed for markedly decreased size in relation to the original size of the lumen. Additionally, evidence of focal narrowing with respect to the more distal lumen or narrowing throughout the visualized portions of the vessel was documented. Angle-adjusted spectral Doppler US samples were obtained from proscribed sites in the common carotid artery and ICA and from any areas of suspected vessel narrowing. Doppler US parameters that were evaluated included peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity, and ratio of the PSV in the ICA to that in the ipsilateral distal common carotid artery. Lesions were classified as being in need of CEA (>70% stenotic) on the basis of a PSV greater than 250 cm/sec and a systolic ratio greater than 4.0 (13).

MR Angiography
All MR angiographies were performed with a 1.5-T magnet. MR angiography usually began with two-dimensional (2D) (repetition time msec/echo time msec of 25/9, 35° flip angle) and three-dimensional (3D) (30/6, 20° flip angle) time-of-flight (TOF) techniques and included gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography as of January 1998. 3D TOF MR angiography (30/6.5, 20° flip angle) was performed through the circle of Willis in all patients. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography was performed as of December 1997 in 21 patients (16 with near total occlusions and five with total occlusions) by using a 3D subtracted gradient-recalled echo sequence and turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence (4/1.6, 25° flip angle, 120 x 256 matrix). Before June 1999, the total dose of gadolinium-based contrast material (ProHance; Bracco Diagnostics) was 20 mL, injected by hand and subsequently with a power injector (Spectris; Medrad, Indianola, Pa) at a rate of 3 mL/sec, following a timing bolus of 6 mL at 3 mL/sec, which was flushed with 15 mL of saline. Source images of all MR angiographic studies were evaluated in all patients.

Total occlusion was defined as a flow signal termination on all sequences at any point along the intra- or extracranial ICA without any identifiable flow signal intensity distally. In the case of near occlusion, the presence of a focal flow gap was noted and taken to imply the presence of a focal stenosis. Flow gap was defined as a finite segment of artery with no perceptible flow signal but displaying visible flow signal intensity proximal and distal to this area. Lumen was considered to be patent if flow was identified within the ICA at any of the MR angiographic sequences performed. The definition of a string sign was similar to that for angiography, as defined earlier.

Two of the authors (S.M.E., E.G.G.) compared the results of US and MR angiography with those of conventional angiography, which was used as the standard for this study. For each patient, US and MR angiographic results were evaluated together to determine if the addition of MR angiography, which was always the second imaging study performed in the work-up, improved diagnosis. Ninety-five percent CIs were calculated (StatXact-4; Cytel Software, Cambridge, Mass).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In 55 (54 men and one woman; age range, 46–76 years; mean age at diagnosis of occlusion, 62.4 years; mean age at diagnosis of near occlusion, 60.5 years) of 274 consecutive patients with 548 ICAs for which angiography was performed, 58 vessels were identified with total occlusion or near occlusion and fit other inclusion criteria defined earlier. Catheter angiography depicted 37 total occlusions, which included 34 that occurred at or near the vessel origin; one, at several centimeters beyond the origin; and two, in the area of the carotid siphon, at the end of a highly atrophic ICA lumen. Catheter angiography depicted 21 nearly occlusive ICA lesions. Among this group were 15 arteries with the appearance of a high-grade focal stenosis at or near the vessel origin and a distal luminal collapse. Five vessels had a minute lumen throughout their course and no identifiable focal area of narrowing at their origin. One vessel had a very tight stenosis at the siphon and a stringlike collapsed lumen throughout its entire proximal course.

Total Occlusions
On the basis of the combination of criteria defined earlier, US correctly depicted all (100%) total occlusions. In two of the three cases of occlusion distal to the ICA origin, the diagnosis was based on the spectral pattern of low-velocity flow, with an absent diastolic component in a patient with a patent cervical ICA (Fig 1). In the third distal occlusion, flow in the ICA could not be identified in the neck, and the vessel was diagnosed as occluded despite the presence of a minute patent proximal lumen at catheter angiography.



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. Total occlusion of the distal right ICA. (a) Spectral Doppler US image obtained from the proximal ICA reveals low-velocity flow (6 cm/sec vs 62 cm/sec in the opposite ICA), with absent diastolic component. (b) Lateral conventional angiogram of the common carotid artery bifurcation demonstrates a small-caliber lumen of the cervical ICA (arrows), with delayed forward flow relative to flow in the external carotid artery. No focal stenosis is seen in the proximal ICA. (c) Lateral conventional angiogram of the siphon obtained with injection in the same common carotid artery demonstrates occlusion of the intracranial ICA at the level of the ophthalmic artery (arrow).

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. Total occlusion of the distal right ICA. (a) Spectral Doppler US image obtained from the proximal ICA reveals low-velocity flow (6 cm/sec vs 62 cm/sec in the opposite ICA), with absent diastolic component. (b) Lateral conventional angiogram of the common carotid artery bifurcation demonstrates a small-caliber lumen of the cervical ICA (arrows), with delayed forward flow relative to flow in the external carotid artery. No focal stenosis is seen in the proximal ICA. (c) Lateral conventional angiogram of the siphon obtained with injection in the same common carotid artery demonstrates occlusion of the intracranial ICA at the level of the ophthalmic artery (arrow).

 


View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1c. Total occlusion of the distal right ICA. (a) Spectral Doppler US image obtained from the proximal ICA reveals low-velocity flow (6 cm/sec vs 62 cm/sec in the opposite ICA), with absent diastolic component. (b) Lateral conventional angiogram of the common carotid artery bifurcation demonstrates a small-caliber lumen of the cervical ICA (arrows), with delayed forward flow relative to flow in the external carotid artery. No focal stenosis is seen in the proximal ICA. (c) Lateral conventional angiogram of the siphon obtained with injection in the same common carotid artery demonstrates occlusion of the intracranial ICA at the level of the ophthalmic artery (arrow).

 
MR angiography correctly depicted 34 (92%) of 37 total occlusions (95% CI: 0.78, 0.98). All cases in which the occlusion occurred at the bifurcation were correctly diagnosed at MR angiography. MR angiography led to incorrect interpretation of three occlusions that occurred beyond the bifurcation as patent near occlusions. In one case, on the basis of catheter angiographic results, the ICA was occluded several centimeters beyond its origin, at the end of a long stringlike narrowing. The vessel was assumed to be patent at gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, as flow was identified beyond the bifurcation in the cervical ICA. In the other two cases, occlusion occurred at the level of the supraclinoid ICA. Of the five patients with occlusion who were examined with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, four also underwent 2D and 3D TOF imaging, and all modalities correctly depicted the lesions as occluded.

Near Occlusions at US
US correctly depicted 18 (86%) of 21 near occlusions (95% CI: 0.64, 0.97); three were overestimated as completely occluded. These three ICAs were a mixed group consisting of one high-grade stenosis with distal atrophy, one string lesion, and one siphon stenosis with a collapsed proximal lumen. Of the 18 near occlusions that were correctly identified, 17 were diagnosed at color Doppler US. Power Doppler US allowed diagnosis in one additional vessel in which color Doppler US failed to depict flow. Two of the three vessels in which flow was not identified were examined with power Doppler US, which also failed to depict the residual lumen.

Catheter angiography depicted 15 of 21 near occlusions as having focal high-grade stenoses with distal collapse. US helped to correctly determine that 14 of these were patent, and one was overestimated as a total occlusion. Twelve of these 14 lesions had PSVs that were sufficiently high to allow them to be classified as surgical lesions (>=70% stenosis) on the basis of the spectral Doppler US findings alone. PSVs in this group ranged between 250 and 706 cm/sec (mean, 411 cm/sec; median, 331 cm/sec). The remaining two lesions had velocities that would have been classified as middle range stenoses (50%–60%) with PSV (202 and 229 cm/sec). Other spectral Doppler US parameters were also not in the surgical range. Among the two lesions, one had color and power Doppler US findings typical of a high-grade stenosis, with areas of focal narrowing proximally with aliasing, and a very small distal lumen (Fig 2). The other lesion was incorrectly classified as a string, because no identifiable area of focal narrowing was found.



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Near occlusion of the right ICA with proximal focal stenosis. (a, b) Longitudinal color Doppler US images demonstrate diffusely narrowed lumen but focal region of aliasing (arrow in a) and elevated Doppler US parameters. PSV was not sufficiently elevated to imply lesion with greater than 70% stenosis. Near occlusion was suggested on the basis of the color Doppler US appearance. (c) Frontal 3D turbo FLASH gadolinium-enhanced MR angiogram (4.0/1.6; 25° flip angle) demonstrates collapse of the ICA lumen (short arrows) distal to a focal stenosis at the origin (long arrow). (d) Lateral conventional angiogram of the right common carotid artery bifurcation confirms focal stenosis at the ICA origin (arrow) and distal luminal collapse. Patient underwent successful CEA.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Near occlusion of the right ICA with proximal focal stenosis. (a, b) Longitudinal color Doppler US images demonstrate diffusely narrowed lumen but focal region of aliasing (arrow in a) and elevated Doppler US parameters. PSV was not sufficiently elevated to imply lesion with greater than 70% stenosis. Near occlusion was suggested on the basis of the color Doppler US appearance. (c) Frontal 3D turbo FLASH gadolinium-enhanced MR angiogram (4.0/1.6; 25° flip angle) demonstrates collapse of the ICA lumen (short arrows) distal to a focal stenosis at the origin (long arrow). (d) Lateral conventional angiogram of the right common carotid artery bifurcation confirms focal stenosis at the ICA origin (arrow) and distal luminal collapse. Patient underwent successful CEA.

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. Near occlusion of the right ICA with proximal focal stenosis. (a, b) Longitudinal color Doppler US images demonstrate diffusely narrowed lumen but focal region of aliasing (arrow in a) and elevated Doppler US parameters. PSV was not sufficiently elevated to imply lesion with greater than 70% stenosis. Near occlusion was suggested on the basis of the color Doppler US appearance. (c) Frontal 3D turbo FLASH gadolinium-enhanced MR angiogram (4.0/1.6; 25° flip angle) demonstrates collapse of the ICA lumen (short arrows) distal to a focal stenosis at the origin (long arrow). (d) Lateral conventional angiogram of the right common carotid artery bifurcation confirms focal stenosis at the ICA origin (arrow) and distal luminal collapse. Patient underwent successful CEA.

 


View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2d. Near occlusion of the right ICA with proximal focal stenosis. (a, b) Longitudinal color Doppler US images demonstrate diffusely narrowed lumen but focal region of aliasing (arrow in a) and elevated Doppler US parameters. PSV was not sufficiently elevated to imply lesion with greater than 70% stenosis. Near occlusion was suggested on the basis of the color Doppler US appearance. (c) Frontal 3D turbo FLASH gadolinium-enhanced MR angiogram (4.0/1.6; 25° flip angle) demonstrates collapse of the ICA lumen (short arrows) distal to a focal stenosis at the origin (long arrow). (d) Lateral conventional angiogram of the right common carotid artery bifurcation confirms focal stenosis at the ICA origin (arrow) and distal luminal collapse. Patient underwent successful CEA.

 
Four of five string lesions found at catheter angiography were identified as patent at US. All four were correctly differentiated from focal high-grade stenoses. Color and/or power Doppler US demonstrated a stringlike lumen, with no focal narrowing or localized area of aliasing in all four. One lesion had high-velocity flow (PSV, 328 cm/sec) throughout its visualized course and an unusual irregular lumen (Fig 3). The second lesion had Doppler US parameters in the middle range (PSV, 237 cm/sec). In the remaining two lesions, only a fine line of flow was identified at color and/or power Doppler US; interpretable spectral velocity readings could not be obtained. In one patient, a collapsed lumen due to a focal siphon stenosis was classified as occluded at US (Fig 4).



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Near occlusion of the left ICA with diffuse disease and no focal stenosis. (a) Longitudinal power Doppler US image demonstrates diffusely narrowed lumen with unusual pattern of wall irregularity. Arrows demarcate the segment of the narrowed lumen. The scale markers to the right, which are located every 5 mm, suggest a residual lumen no greater than 2 or 3 mm in transverse diameter. (b) Spectral power Doppler US evaluation demonstrated high-velocity flow throughout visualized cervical ICA. Arrows are located along the same segment of artery as that denoted by arrows in a. (c) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiogram (4.0/1.6, 25° flip angle) shows diffusely narrowed and irregular lumen (arrows) of the left ICA. Status of siphon was difficult to determine. (d) Lateral conventional angiogram confirms the presence of diffusely narrowed and irregular ICA lumen that filled in a delayed fashion. Arrows mark the area of the vessel investigated in a and b. The vessel (arrowheads) was patent throughout.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Near occlusion of the left ICA with diffuse disease and no focal stenosis. (a) Longitudinal power Doppler US image demonstrates diffusely narrowed lumen with unusual pattern of wall irregularity. Arrows demarcate the segment of the narrowed lumen. The scale markers to the right, which are located every 5 mm, suggest a residual lumen no greater than 2 or 3 mm in transverse diameter. (b) Spectral power Doppler US evaluation demonstrated high-velocity flow throughout visualized cervical ICA. Arrows are located along the same segment of artery as that denoted by arrows in a. (c) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiogram (4.0/1.6, 25° flip angle) shows diffusely narrowed and irregular lumen (arrows) of the left ICA. Status of siphon was difficult to determine. (d) Lateral conventional angiogram confirms the presence of diffusely narrowed and irregular ICA lumen that filled in a delayed fashion. Arrows mark the area of the vessel investigated in a and b. The vessel (arrowheads) was patent throughout.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3c. Near occlusion of the left ICA with diffuse disease and no focal stenosis. (a) Longitudinal power Doppler US image demonstrates diffusely narrowed lumen with unusual pattern of wall irregularity. Arrows demarcate the segment of the narrowed lumen. The scale markers to the right, which are located every 5 mm, suggest a residual lumen no greater than 2 or 3 mm in transverse diameter. (b) Spectral power Doppler US evaluation demonstrated high-velocity flow throughout visualized cervical ICA. Arrows are located along the same segment of artery as that denoted by arrows in a. (c) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiogram (4.0/1.6, 25° flip angle) shows diffusely narrowed and irregular lumen (arrows) of the left ICA. Status of siphon was difficult to determine. (d) Lateral conventional angiogram confirms the presence of diffusely narrowed and irregular ICA lumen that filled in a delayed fashion. Arrows mark the area of the vessel investigated in a and b. The vessel (arrowheads) was patent throughout.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3d. Near occlusion of the left ICA with diffuse disease and no focal stenosis. (a) Longitudinal power Doppler US image demonstrates diffusely narrowed lumen with unusual pattern of wall irregularity. Arrows demarcate the segment of the narrowed lumen. The scale markers to the right, which are located every 5 mm, suggest a residual lumen no greater than 2 or 3 mm in transverse diameter. (b) Spectral power Doppler US evaluation demonstrated high-velocity flow throughout visualized cervical ICA. Arrows are located along the same segment of artery as that denoted by arrows in a. (c) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiogram (4.0/1.6, 25° flip angle) shows diffusely narrowed and irregular lumen (arrows) of the left ICA. Status of siphon was difficult to determine. (d) Lateral conventional angiogram confirms the presence of diffusely narrowed and irregular ICA lumen that filled in a delayed fashion. Arrows mark the area of the vessel investigated in a and b. The vessel (arrowheads) was patent throughout.

 


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. Focal right ICA siphon stenosis. (a) Lateral 2D TOF MR angiogram (35/9, 25° flip angle) shows diffusely narrowed ICA lumen (arrows) without significant origin stenosis. (b) Left anterior oblique 3D TOF MR angiogram (30.0/6.5, 20° flip angle) of the circle of Willis shows small ICA lumen (short arrows) and diminished or absent flow signal intensity (long arrow) within the distal intracranial ICA. Flow signal intensity in the right middle cerebral artery (arrowhead) was markedly attenuated. (c) Lateral angiogram of the intracranial ICA depicts stenosis beginning at the level of the ophthalmic artery (arrow).

 


View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. Focal right ICA siphon stenosis. (a) Lateral 2D TOF MR angiogram (35/9, 25° flip angle) shows diffusely narrowed ICA lumen (arrows) without significant origin stenosis. (b) Left anterior oblique 3D TOF MR angiogram (30.0/6.5, 20° flip angle) of the circle of Willis shows small ICA lumen (short arrows) and diminished or absent flow signal intensity (long arrow) within the distal intracranial ICA. Flow signal intensity in the right middle cerebral artery (arrowhead) was markedly attenuated. (c) Lateral angiogram of the intracranial ICA depicts stenosis beginning at the level of the ophthalmic artery (arrow).

 


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4c. Focal right ICA siphon stenosis. (a) Lateral 2D TOF MR angiogram (35/9, 25° flip angle) shows diffusely narrowed ICA lumen (arrows) without significant origin stenosis. (b) Left anterior oblique 3D TOF MR angiogram (30.0/6.5, 20° flip angle) of the circle of Willis shows small ICA lumen (short arrows) and diminished or absent flow signal intensity (long arrow) within the distal intracranial ICA. Flow signal intensity in the right middle cerebral artery (arrowhead) was markedly attenuated. (c) Lateral angiogram of the intracranial ICA depicts stenosis beginning at the level of the ophthalmic artery (arrow).

 
Near Occlusions at MR Angiography
Overall, MR angiography correctly depicted all 21 (100%) near occlusions as patent. 2D and 3D TOF imaging were used in 19 of 21 vessels. The 2D technique correctly revealed 18 (95%) of 19 near occlusions, while 3D TOF correctly revealed 14 (74%) of 19. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography was used in all of the 16 vessels examined most recently and correctly depicted 15 (94%) vessels with near occlusion. In one patient in whom the lesion was overestimated as occluded at gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, data from 3D TOF imaging of the circle of Willis suggested the diagnosis of patency. Of the 16 patients that underwent gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, 14 also underwent 2D and 3D TOF imaging. In these patients, 2D TOF imaging correctly depicted patent lumens in all lesions, while three lesions were overestimated as occluded at 3D TOF imaging.

Two-dimensional TOF imaging depicted 18 patent arteries among the 19 vessels in which it was used. Fourteen of these vessels had focal disease at catheter angiography. In this group, 12 vessels had flow gaps and two did not. Among the three vessels with diffuse disease thought to be patent at 2D TOF imaging, two had flow gaps and one did not. The single patient with a collapsed lumen proximal to a siphon stenosis had no flow gap at the ICA origin. 3D TOF imaging depicted 14 patent arteries among the 19 vessels in which it was used. Thirteen of these vessels had focal disease at catheter angiography. In this group, 12 had flow gaps and one did not. Only one of the vessels with diffuse disease was seen at 3D TOF imaging; this vessel had a flow gap.

Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography depicted 15 patent arteries among the 16 vessels in which it was used. Twelve of these had focal disease at catheter angiography. Seven gaps were found in this group, and the remaining five had no gaps. At review of the vessels without flow gaps, however, four clearly demonstrated a focal narrowed area at the ICA origin and would have been correctly classified as focal disease. Among the two vessels with diffuse disease, which were thought to be patent at gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, both had flow gaps.

In general, since flow gaps were identified in vessels having both focal and diffuse disease, this finding did not appear effective in differentiating these lesions.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The importance of differentiating patients with a patent residual ICA lumen from those with complete occlusion is considerable. Overestimating near occlusions as totally occluded will deprive high-risk patients of the benefits of CEA. Misdiagnosis of a complete occlusion as a patent vessel has the potential to lead to the submitting of a patient to unnecessary angiography or surgery. It is because of this dilemma that we have historically performed angiography in these patients. As can be seen from our study results, the classification of patients as having nonoperative (total occlusion) versus operative (near occlusion) lesions is not as straightforward as might be supposed. Among the occluded vessels, flow usually ceases at or near the bifurcation, but the occlusion may occasionally occur in the midcervical ICA or at the siphon. Regardless, these patients are not candidates for endarterectomy. Conversely, while most near occlusions result from focal high-grade stenoses and are treated with CEA like other vessels having high-grade lesions, in our series, five of 21 did not. These vessels were abnormal over the entire length of the ICA, limiting the applicability of conventional CEA (14).

The ability of US to successfully help differentiate total from near total occlusions has been investigated in several recent reports (1519). Most of these authors advocated surgery on the basis of US as the sole imaging technique. Some added the caveat that the US study must be "technically adequate" if other imaging studies are to be bypassed (15,18). This approach, however, is not universally accepted, and, on basis of our observations, cannot be recommended. In our study, US successfully depicted all angiographically identified total occlusions. On the other hand, by relying on US alone, three of 21 (14%) subtotal lesions (ie, near occlusions) would have been called occluded, at least one of which was a clear candidate for CEA.

To our knowledge, little information about the flow patterns in near occlusions is available in the US literature, but it has often been implied that they have a slow flow based on the principle that beyond a certain degree of stenosis the velocity begins to decrease (20). In our series, this was not the case in most patients with high-grade proximal lesions and distal collapse. Eleven of 13 such vessels exhibited velocity patterns that would have placed them clearly in the operative (>=70% stenosis) group. Even among classic string lesions, two demonstrated very high velocity. Of concern, with regard to patients with focal lesions is the small subgroup of patients with middle range or low velocities who could be excluded from surgery on the basis of spectral velocity alone. In this group, US depiction of an extremely narrowed lumen at color or power Doppler US was an important part of the diagnosis.

It is often stated that power Doppler US may be superior to color Doppler US in depicting the extremely narrowed lumen of near occlusions (21). In our experience, while power Doppler US did depict one patent lumen that was not seen with conventional color Doppler US, two lesions were still missed despite its use.

The ability of US to depict occlusions beyond the available sonographic window in the neck is also not well documented, and the existence of such pathologic findings has been essentially ignored in some of the series mentioned earlier (15). Low-velocity flow with a high resistance pattern when measured in a patent cervical ICA has been described as suggesting a distal lesion or dissection (12). Indeed, occlusions beyond the visible area of the cervical ICA were implied in two cases by virtue of this pattern. While both patients in our series with this pattern had occlusion, it is certainly possible that similar waveforms could be found in association with a severe high-grade distal stenosis, although this did not occur in our single case of distal stenosis. This case was somewhat unusual in that the proximal vessel was severely narrowed, and no flow was seen at US.

MR angiography performed well in the identification of total occlusions that occur at the ICA origin; all were correctly classified. Despite the ability of MR angiography to enable imaging from the arch to the terminal ICA bifurcation, it fell short in delineating supraclinoid disease, whether occlusive or tightly stenotic. Reasons for this are likely related to resolution and the inability of MR angiography to depict segmental occlusions within such a short segment as the supraclinoid ICA. This MR angiographic diagnosis is further complicated by the presence of collateral flow distal to the occlusion, without the ability to define the flow direction or sequence of vessel filling. The ability to define the minute lumen of such small vessels may be difficult to demonstrate with any noninvasive modality, and given current technology, still requires the fine detail and temporal information provided by means of conventional angiography.

MR angiography performed better than did US in depicting near occlusions, as it successfully depicted all 21. Furthermore, 2D TOF imaging was better at depicting near occlusion than 3D TOF imaging. As has been previously described, there is improved sensitivity to slow flow with 2D TOF imaging, when compared with 3D TOF imaging, due to saturation effects (16). Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography was better than either of the TOF techniques for depicting near occlusion, correctly identifying all 16 cases in which it was used. The superiority of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is due to increased signal-to-noise ratio and decreased intravoxal dephasing (22,23). It should be noted that in one case, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography appeared to lead to an incorrect interpretation of an angiographically diagnosed total occlusion that occurred in the midcervical ICA.

However, on the basis of a thorough review of both MR and catheter angiographic findings, the question of whether the angiogram might have eventually demonstrated flow is raised. Even optimally performed catheter angiography may have difficulty in helping to differentiate complete and complicated near occlusion (9). In our experience, in keeping with previous literature, the optimum performance of all MR angiographic techniques is heavily dependent on the review of source images and the inclusion of MR angiography of the circle of Willis (24,25). In several cases, only on the basis of source images could the lumen of the ICA be followed from the cervical region to the skull base.

We classified vessels with near occlusions into those with proximal high-grade stenosis and distal luminal collapse and those with diffuse luminal narrowing and no visible proximal stenosis. Diffuse carotid disease has been categorized in the older angiography literature as resulting from such entities as dissection, postradiation change, subacute partial thrombosis, and chronic subtotal thrombosis (9). In our series, five such lesions were identified. Additionally, two stringlike lesions were found in patients with distal occlusions, and one was seen in a patient with a tight stenosis in the area of the siphon. Regardless of whether these lesions were occlusive or nonocclusive, none of the patients was a candidate for CEA, as the disease was not located in or confined to a surgically accessible region. Such information is obviously vital to treatment planning. In these patients, treatment options may include reconstruction of the artery by means of stent placement, angioplasty, or surgical ligation of the vessel, or medical management may be the only option. In fact, attempts at CEA in these patients may be detrimental (14). While surgical exploration of all cases would have provided a more accurate standard for this and similar studies, in practice, diagnosis must be made prior to patient treatment decisions, including surgery. This is particularly true in patients with lesions located beyond a viable surgical field, in whom angiography may still be the only standard.

On the basis of the results of our study, several conclusions can be drawn about the use of noninvasive examinations versus angiography in patients with total and near total occlusions. Assuming US to be the initial imaging technique, if a complete occlusion is suspected at or near the bifurcation, MR angiography should be used to confirm its presence. The MR angiographic study should include imaging of the circle of Willis. If occlusion is confirmed, no further imaging is necessary. Vessels found to have focal high-grade stenosis and suspected distal collapse at US can be dealt with in a fashion similar to that for any other high-grade lesion. This may vary somewhat, depending on the philosophy of the referring physician and the institution. However, in the present study, MR angiography added little in this group due to its limited ability to help differentiate between vessels with focal very high stenoses and those with diffuse disease.

Finally, a small group of vessels that have true string lesions remain. These may be found at MR angiography in patients thought to have occlusion at US or culled from the general population of near occlusions when US fails to demonstrate focal disease in an otherwise very narrow ICA. Patients with low-velocity high-resistance flow in the ICA would also fall into this category, regardless of the appearance of the bifurcation, due to the implication that severe distal disease is present. This group of patients with diffusely narrowed ICA lumina, which comprised eight (13.7%) of 58 vessels, often have unusual lesions, and informed therapeutic decisions in this unique population may still be best made by using conventional angiography.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: CEA = carotid endarterectomy, ICA = internal carotid artery, PSV = peak systolic velocity, 3D = three dimensional, TOF = time of flight, 2D = two dimensional

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, S.M.E., E.G.G.; study concepts, S.M.E., E.G.G., S.N.C., J.D.B.; study design, S.M.E., E.G.G.; literature research, E.G.G., S.M.E., G.M.H.; clinical studies, S.M.E., E.G.G., G.M.H., P.T.Z.; data acquisition, S.M.E., E.G.G., G.M.H.; data analysis/interpretation, S.M.E., E.G.G., G.M.H., P.T.Z.; statistical analysis, S.M.E., E.G.G.; manuscript preparation, S.M.E., E.G.G.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, all authors; manuscript editing, S.M.E., E.G.G.; manuscript revision/review and final version approval, all authors.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:445-453.
  2. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1415-1425.
  3. Morgenstern LB, Fox AJ, Sharpe BL, Eliasziw M, Barnett HJ, Grotta JC. The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Neurology 1997; 48:911-915.
  4. Klijn CJM, Kappelle LJ, Tulleken CAF, van Gijn J. Symptomatic carotid artery occlusion: a reappraisal of hemodynamic factors. Stroke 1997; 28:2084-2093.
  5. Kent KC, Kuntz KM, Patel MR, et al. Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of morbidity and cost effectiveness in symptomatic patients. JAMA 1995; 274:888-893.
  6. Gortler M, Niethammer R, Widder B. Differentiating subtotal carotid artery stenoses from occlusions by color coded duplex sonography. J Neurol 1994; 241:301-305.
  7. Ringelstein EB, Berg-Dammer E, Zeumer H. The so-called atheromatous pseudoocclusion of the internal carotid artery: a diagnostic and therapeutical challenge. Neuroradiology 1983; 25:147-155.
  8. Hetzel A, Eckenweber B, Trummer B, Werna M, Schumacher M, von Reutern GM. Colour-coded duplex sonography of perocclusive stenosis. Eur J Ultrasound 1998; 8:183-191.
  9. Mehigan JT, Olcott C. The carotid "string" sign: differential diagnosis and management. Neurology 1980; 140:137-143.
  10. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ. Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 1990; 21:209-222.
  11. Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993; 186:316-318.
  12. Lee TH, Ryu SJ, Chen ST, Chan JL. Carotid ultrasonographic findings in intracranial internal carotid artery occlusion. Angiology 1993; 44:607-613.
  13. Grant EG. Non-invasive diagnosis of extracranial cerebrovascular disease. In: Thrall JH, eds. Current practice of radiology. St Louis, Mo: Mosby–Year Book, 1993; 570-579.
  14. Archie JP. Carotid endarterectomy when the distal internal carotid artery is small or poorly visualized. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19:23-31.
  15. AbuRahma AF, Pollack JA, Robinson PA, Mullins D. The reliability of color duplex ultrasound in diagnosing total carotid occlusion. Am J Surg 1997; 174:185-187.
  16. Furst G, Saleh A, Wenserski F, et al. Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 1999; 30:1444-1449.
  17. Berman SS, Devine JJ, Erdoes LS, Hunter GC. Distinguishing carotid artery pseudo-occlusion with color-flow Doppler. Stroke 1995; 26:434-438.
  18. Mansour MA, Mattos MA, Hood DB, et al. Detection of total occlusion, string sign and pre-occlusive stenosis of the internal carotid artery by color-flow duplex scanning. Am J Surg 1995; 170:154-158.
  19. Lee DH, Gao FQ, Rankin RN, Pelz DM, Fox AJ. Duplex and color flow sonography of occlusion and near-occlusion of the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17:1267-1274.
  20. Browman MW, Cooperberg PL, Harrison PB, Marsh JI, Mallek N. Duplex ultrasonography criteria for internal carotid stenosis of more than 70% diameter: angiographic correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. J Can Assoc Radiol 1995; 46:291-295.
  21. Griewing B, Morgenstern C, Driesner F, Kallwellis G, Walker ML, Kessler C. Cerebrovascular disease assessed by color-flow and power Doppler ultrasonography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography in internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1996; 27:95-100.
  22. Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three dimensional MR angiography—preliminary study. Radiology 1998; 209:95-102.
  23. Wollig DS, Turski PA, Frayne R, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 208:447-451.
  24. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Lee RE, et al. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by MR angiography: comparison with x-ray angiography and color-coded Doppler ultrasound. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992; 13:989-1003.
  25. Bowen BC, Quencer RM, Margosian P, Pattany PM. MR angiography of occlusive disease of the arteries in the head and neck: current concepts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:9-18.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
J. J. Alexander, J. Moawad, and D. Super
Outcome Analysis of Carotid Artery Occlusion
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 2007; 41(5): 409 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. Saba, G. Caddeo, R. Sanfilippo, R. Montisci, and G. Mallarini
CT and Ultrasound in the Study of Ulcerated Carotid Plaque Compared with Surgical Results: Potentialities and Advantages of Multidetector Row CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1061 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
B. Thanvi and T. Robinson
Complete occlusion of extracranial internal carotid artery: clinical features, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2007; 83(976): 95 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.J. Thomas, R. Gupta, A.H. Tayal, M.B. Horowitz, and T.G. Jovin
Stenting and Angioplasty of the Symptomatic Chronically Occluded Carotid Artery
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 168 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
C. Ohm, P. J. Bendick, J. Monash, P. G. Bove, O. W. Brown, G. W. Long, G. B. Zelenock, and C. J. Shanley
Diagnosis of Total Internal Carotid Occlusions with Duplex Ultrasound and Ultrasound Contrast
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 2005; 39(3): 237 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. G. Grant, C. B. Benson, G. L. Moneta, A. V. Alexandrov, J. D. Baker, E. I. Bluth, B. A. Carroll, M. Eliasziw, J. Gocke, B. S. Hertzberg, et al.
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 340 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
G. M Hathout, M. J. Duh, and S. M. El-Saden
Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Predicting Angiographic Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery: Linear Regression Analysis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2003; 24(9): 1747 - 1756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. S. Kriegshauser, M. D. Patel, and K. D. Nelson
Carotid Pseudostring Sign From Vasa Vasorum Collaterals
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2003; 22(9): 959 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez
Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2212001606v1
221/2/301    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Saden, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Saden, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE