Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 19, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2233010025
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2233010025v1
223/3/639    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goyal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goyal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.
(Radiology 2002;223:639-644.)
© RSNA, 2002


Pediatric Imaging

Venous Vascular Malformations in Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Results of Alcohol Sclerotherapy with Proposed MR Imaging Classification1

Mayank Goyal, MD, Petrina A. Causer, MD, FRCP and Derek Armstrong, MD, FRCP

1 From the Department of Medical Imaging/Neuroradiology, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8. From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received June 4, 2001; revision requested January 17; final revision received October 1; accepted October 16. Address correspondence to D.A. (e-mail: derek.armstrong@sickkids.on.ca).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical results of percutaneous sclerotherapy of venous vascular malformations (VVMs) with the authors’ proposed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR findings and clinical results of percutaneous alcohol sclerotherapy in 59 pediatric patients with VVMs were retrospectively reviewed. Before treatment, lesions were graded with MR imaging on the basis of margins and size, respectively: grade 1, well defined, less than or equal to 5 cm; grade 2A, well defined, greater than 5 cm; grade 2B, ill defined, less than or equal to 5 cm; and grade 3, ill defined, greater than 5 cm. Regression models were used to test trends in therapy across the MR classification grades, including the repeat sclerotherapies, volumes of ethanol and metrizamide administered for each lesion, and number of access sites. Clinical response to sclerotherapy, which was evaluated with consensus by a multidisciplinary team, was graded as poor, good, or excellent. Association between MR imaging grade and clinical assessment was tested with the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS: There were 14 grade 1 lesions, nine grade 2A, 15 grade 2B, and 21 grade 3. Twenty-four patients had a poor response to sclerotherapy; 19, good; and 16, excellent. Ten of 14 (71%) grade 1 lesions had an excellent response; none, a poor response. Twelve of 21 (57%) grade 3 lesions had a poor response; none, an excellent result. Grade 2 lesions were relatively equally distributed among the three categories, with the exception of nine of 15 (60%) grade 2B lesions that had a poor response (P < .001). There was a trend with increasing lesion grade for increasing numbers of sclerotherapy sessions, volumes of ethanol and metrizamide for each lesion, and numbers of access sites.

CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between this proposed MR imaging classification and the results of percutaneous sclerotherapy.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Alcohol, 9*.12642, 9*.759 • Arteriovenous malformations, 9*.1264, 9*.759 • Interventional procedures, in infants and children, 9*.1264, 9*.759 • Veins, malformations, 9*.1264, 9*.759 • Veins, therapeutic embolization, 9*.1264, 9*.759


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Various classification systems have been proposed for vascular lesions. Venous vascular malformations (VVMs) are most accurately distinguished from hemangiomas and arteriovenous malformations on the basis of classification systems for vascular lesions established by Mulliken and Glowacki (1) and Kaban and Mulliken (2). With the former system, the clinical behavior and endothelial cell characteristics are emphasized; with the latter, differentiation is based on vascular flow dynamics. The former system helps diagnosis and prediction of the natural history of the lesion; the latter is critical for establishing the appropriate management. Neither classification system was designed for the purpose of predicting treatment outcome.

According to the classification system of Mulliken and Glowacki (1), vascular malformations are structural abnormalities that result from abnormal blood or lymphatic vessel morphogenesis and display normal endothelial cell mitotic activity. Vascular malformations may possess any combination of capillary, venous, arterial, and lymphatic components. Venous and lymphovenous malformations are congenital, but they may not become clinically apparent until late infancy or early childhood. They are rare and occur with equal frequency in male and female patients. VVMs do not regress or involute but rather grow commensurately with the child (1). Rapid enlargement may occur during puberty or pregnancy or with trauma (3). Potential complications, some of which have the potential to be life threatening, include pain, compression or invasion of adjacent structures, decreased range of motion, bleeding, consumptive coagulopathy, and cosmetic deformity (46). Vascular malformations are distinct from hemangiomas, which are the most common tumors in infancy. Hemangiomas may or may not be present at birth, and they occur predominantly in female patients. They demonstrate a proliferative phase of increased endothelial cell mitotic activity and an involuting phase, which is usually complete by age 5–7 years (1).

In the classification system of Kaban and Mulliken (2), which is based on vascular flow dynamics, arteriovenous malformations are categorized as either low flow (eg, capillary, venous, and lymphatic malformations) or high flow. Management of low-flow VVMs is difficult. Surgical resection may be hazardous owing to major blood loss and incomplete resection. In addition, recurrence and poor cosmetic results are common (7). Medical therapies, including steroid administration, laser photocoagulation, and transcatheter arterial embolization, have only limited success (812). Percutaneous sclerotherapy, most commonly with ethanol, with or without surgical excision, is now advocated as the treatment of choice (46,13). In contrast, arteriovenous malformations are usually treated with selective arterial embolization before surgical resection (46,1215).

Diagnosis of VVMs is usually based on medical history and physical examination (16). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features for VVMs have been previously established (1719), including high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images, multicystic spaces in lymphatic components with or without associated hemorrhage, contrast enhancement of venous components, lack of signal voids, presence of phleboliths, and the general appearances of superficial well-defined lesions or deeply infiltrating lesions along fascial planes. Therefore, MR imaging can help characterization and diagnosis of the lesion, but its most important role is in the display of the extent and relationship of the lesion to surrounding structures (17,18,20,21). It is this capability of MR imaging that helps therapeutic planning, and we postulate that MR imaging has the potential to help predict treatment outcome.

At our institution, a multidisciplinary team, including pediatric plastic surgeons and interventional radiologists, undertakes the management of VVMs. A carefully reasoned treatment plan that can be comprehended by the patient and family, including realistic therapeutic expectations, is crucial. Treatment strategies are based on a comprehensive clinical assessment and MR imaging. To our knowledge, there are no data published for the MR features of VVMs that help predict outcome of these lesions after sclerotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of percutaneous sclerotherapy of VVMs in children with our proposed MR classification system.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We retrospectively reviewed the consecutive cases from February 1993 to October 1999 of all VVMs that were treated with fluoroscopically guided percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy, preprocedural MR evaluation, and a minimum 12-week clinical follow-up. At the time of this study, institutional review board approval or patient informed consent were not required for a retrospective review of a patient’s images and clinical information. Patients were identified from the database of the vascular lesion clinic at our institution. One hundred thirty-seven patients presented at our institution with non–central nervous system venous and lymphovenous malformations. One hundred six (77%) of these 137 patients were treated with percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy, and 67 (63%) of the 106 patients underwent preprocedural MR imaging. Fifty-nine (88%) of the 67 patients underwent a minimum clinical follow-up of 12 weeks, and they were included in our study. Among the 59 patients were 27 male and 32 female patients (age range, 1–22 years; mean age, 11.4 years). Disease in patients was diagnosed on the basis of clinical presentation and physical examination and confirmed on the basis of results at MR imaging and venography. Fifty-one patients presented with purely venous malformations and eight, with lymphovenous malformations. Lesion locations included extremities (n = 25), head and neck (n = 21), pelvis (gluteal or perineal, n = 7), and trunk (n = 6).

Two radiologists (M.G., P.C.), who were blinded to the treatment outcome, retrospectively and independently reviewed the preprocedural MR images. Any differences in opinion were resolved with consensus. Imaging was performed with a 1.5-T superconducting magnet. Spin-echo T1-weighted (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 600/20) and spin-echo T2-weighted (2,500/20) images were obtained of all lesions in multiple planes. Additional imaging was performed when the clinical scenario dictated, including MR angiography if there was suspicion of an arteriovenous malformation and gadolinium-enhanced (Magnevist [0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight]; Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ) MR imaging if there was suspicion of a neoplasm. Lesions were categorized on the basis of our proposed MR classification system according to VVM morphology, including size and margins, which were well defined, ill defined, or infiltrative (Table; Figs 14). A well-defined or circumscribed margin has a sharp abrupt transition from the surrounding tissue, which remains confined to its tissue and fascial plane. An ill-defined margin has an irregular interface with the surrounding tissue because the lesion may cross tissue and fascial planes. Differentiation between a venous and a lymphovenous malformation was based on MR characteristics, including nonenhancing cystic spaces with or without hemorrhage in lymphatic portions and enhancing venous components. The diagnosis of a lymphovenous malformation was confirmed at venography on the basis of aspiration of lymph and blood before the injection of contrast material.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Association of MR Classification System with Clinical Results

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. Grade 1 VVM, pure venous type, in a 12-year-old girl. (a) Transverse T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (570/15) shows a small superficial well-defined VVM (arrow) that is 3.8 x 4.0 x 2.0 cm and isointense to the muscle of the right cheek. (b) Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (5,700/90) of the same lesion (arrow) shows that it has high signal intensity.

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. Grade 1 VVM, pure venous type, in a 12-year-old girl. (a) Transverse T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (570/15) shows a small superficial well-defined VVM (arrow) that is 3.8 x 4.0 x 2.0 cm and isointense to the muscle of the right cheek. (b) Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (5,700/90) of the same lesion (arrow) shows that it has high signal intensity.

 


View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Grade 2A VVM, pure venous type, in 14-year-old boy. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (5,000/98) shows a large well-defined VVM (arrows) that is 15.0 x 4.9 x 5.0 cm, with high signal intensity above the knee. (b) Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (4,000/104) of the same lesion (arrows) demonstrates the craniocaudal extent.

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Grade 2A VVM, pure venous type, in 14-year-old boy. (a) Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (5,000/98) shows a large well-defined VVM (arrows) that is 15.0 x 4.9 x 5.0 cm, with high signal intensity above the knee. (b) Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (4,000/104) of the same lesion (arrows) demonstrates the craniocaudal extent.

 


View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Grade 2B VVM, pure venous type, in an 18-year-old woman. (a) Transverse T2-weighted spin-echo MR image (2,500/20) shows a small ill-defined infiltrating VVM (arrows) that is 4.5 x 2.0 x 4.0 cm, with high signal intensity that involves the forearm. (b) Gadolinium-enhanced coronal T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (450/10) of the same lesion (arrows) demonstrates enhancement.

 


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Grade 2B VVM, pure venous type, in an 18-year-old woman. (a) Transverse T2-weighted spin-echo MR image (2,500/20) shows a small ill-defined infiltrating VVM (arrows) that is 4.5 x 2.0 x 4.0 cm, with high signal intensity that involves the forearm. (b) Gadolinium-enhanced coronal T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (450/10) of the same lesion (arrows) demonstrates enhancement.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. Grade 3 VVM, lymphovenous type, in an 11-year-old girl with Klippel-Trenauney syndrome. (a) Transverse T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (33/13) shows a large ill-defined infiltrating VVM (solid arrows) that is approximately 65 x 14 x 15 cm. The VVM is predominantly isointense to muscle, with foci of high signal intensity (open arrows) that correspond to hemorrhagic cystic spaces, and involves the right lower extremity. (b) Coronal T2-weighted spin-echo MR image (2,500/80) shows the same lesion (arrows) with high signal intensity. The image demonstrates the extent of involvement of the right lower extremity into the pelvis.

 


View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. Grade 3 VVM, lymphovenous type, in an 11-year-old girl with Klippel-Trenauney syndrome. (a) Transverse T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (33/13) shows a large ill-defined infiltrating VVM (solid arrows) that is approximately 65 x 14 x 15 cm. The VVM is predominantly isointense to muscle, with foci of high signal intensity (open arrows) that correspond to hemorrhagic cystic spaces, and involves the right lower extremity. (b) Coronal T2-weighted spin-echo MR image (2,500/80) shows the same lesion (arrows) with high signal intensity. The image demonstrates the extent of involvement of the right lower extremity into the pelvis.

 
Informed consent was obtained from the patient or family before percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy. Potential risks included those directly related to the procedure (skin and nerve ischemia and necrosis [with possible secondary scarring, sloughing of skin, and blistering] and temporary postprocedural pain) and those related to general anesthesia. With the patient under general anesthesia, lesions were directly punctured with a 21-gauge angiocatheter by means of palpation. Appropriate needle placement was confirmed with venous or lymphovenous reflux. The needle was repositioned or reinserted until such reflux was obtained. At this time, the VVM was opacified at fluoroscopy by injecting a mixture of absolute alcohol (Dehydrated Alcohol [100% volume per volume]; Sabex Laboratories, Boucherville, Quebec, Canada) mixed with metrizamide (Amnipaque; Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY) to render the mixture radiopaque. The concentration of alcohol and metrizamide was 20 mL of alcohol mixed with a 6.75-g 50-mL single-dose vial of metrizamide; the volume of the mixture was determined on a case-by-case basis. In most lesions, multiple access sites were required to opacify the malformation.

When possible, tourniquets were placed proximal to the lesion to slow venous drainage and maximize the time for alcohol to sclerose the lesion. During the procedure, the injection was fluoroscopically evaluated to ensure intralesional administration of ethanol without extravasation into the surrounding soft tissues or draining veins. A maximum volume of 1 mL/kg was injected at one sitting. The injection was stopped before this volume was reached when the lesion was completely opacified, resistance to injection was encountered, or opacification of the venous drainage was seen. In 23 lesions, multiple injections were required at different sittings (range, two to eight sittings).

Patients were initially followed up at our vascular malformation clinic approximately 12 weeks after the procedure. This time allowed resolution of swelling and changes directly related to sclerotherapy and proper assessment of the treatment results. Recommendations for repeat sclerosis or clinical follow-up were based on this initial assessment. For the purpose of this study, the minimum 12-week follow-up was required.

Results of sclerosis therapy were graded with subjective clinical assessment, including interview and examination. MR imaging follow-up was available for some patients but was not included in the evaluation of clinical results. The multidisciplinary team at our vascular malformation clinic, including a pediatric interventional neuroradiologist (D.A.) and a plastic surgeon, performed the assessments. Both lesion size and patient symptoms were assessed, including pain, limitation of movement and function, airway compression, and cosmetic deformity. Patients were followed up from 1 to 5 years. Clinical results were graded as follows: poor, little or no improvement; good, significant decrease in size and symptoms; and excellent, clinical obliteration.

The Fisher exact test was used to test the association between the proposed MR grades and the clinical results of sclerotherapy. Interobserver agreement about lesion margins on MR images was evaluated with the {kappa} statistic. Regression models were used to test for a trend in clinical outcomes across the proposed MR classification groups. Logarithmic transformations of volume and the number of puncture sites were used to ensure approximately constant variances in the corresponding regression analyses.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
On the basis of our proposed MR classification, the most common presentation of the 59 patients was with a grade 3 lesion (n = 21, 36%). The remaining lesions were classified as grades 2B (n = 15, 25%), 1 (n = 14, 24%), and 2A (n = 9, 15%). Five (62%) of the eight lymphovenous malformations were grade 3, two (25%) were grade 1A, and one (13%) was grade 1.

The Table shows the association between the proposed MR classification of VVMs and the clinical assessment in the 59 patients. The association between MR grade and clinical assessment was statistically significant (P < .001, Fisher exact test). Owing to the small number of lesions in the lymphovenous group, subgroup statistical analysis was not performed.

Interobserver agreement was measured for the MR features evaluated in the grading system. There were no discrepancies between the two independent reviewers in the assessment of lesion size. The observers had substantial agreement about lesion margins ({kappa} = 0.79).

During the 1–5-year clinical follow-up, 23 (39%) of the 59 patients required repeat sclerosis. The decision for repeat therapy was determined at either the time of follow-up, on the basis of a lack of clinical improvement, or at the time of therapy, if the lesion was large and multiloculated and therefore required volumes of ethanol that were too large to be administered at one sitting. The mean numbers of repeat sclerotherapy sessions required for each patient for each lesion grade are as follows: grade 1, n = 1, median = 1.0 patients; grade 2A, n = 1.4, range = 1.0–3.0 patients, median = 1.0 patients; grade 2B, n = 2, median = 2.0 patients, range = 1.0–4.0 patients; grade 3, n = 3, median = 2.0 patients, range = 1.0–8.0 patients. With Poisson regression analysis, a trend was found for an increasing number of sessions with increasing lesion grade (P = .024).

Mean volumes of ethanol and metrizamide mixture injected for each lesion for each sitting were the following: grade 1 lesions, 8.4 mL (median, 8.5 mL; range, 3.0–18.0 mL); grade 2A lesions, 17.1 mL (median, 15.0 mL; range, 7.0–30.0 mL); grade 2B lesions, 6.8 mL (median, 12.9 mL; range, 2.0–60.0 mL); and grade 3 lesions, 26.4 mL (median, 20.0 mL; range 3.0–70.0 mL). Linear regression analysis showed that there is an increasing trend in the logarithm of volumes of ethanol and metrizamide with increasing lesion grade (P < .001). Mean total volumes of ethanol and metrizamide mixture injected for each lesion over multiple sittings were the following: grade 1 lesions, 8.4 mL (median, 8.5 mL; range, 3.0–18.0 mL); grade 2A lesions, 24.8 mL (median, 20.0 mL; range, 9.0–60.0 mL); grade 2B lesions, 32.4 mL (median, 29.5 mL; range, 2.0–76.0 mL); grade 3 lesions, 105.4 mL (median, 38 mL; range, 3.0–566.0 mL). With a similar analysis, there was a trend of increasing total lesional volumes of injected ethanol and metrizamide with increasing grade (P < .001).

In addition, 42 (71%) of the 59 lesions required multiple access sites to opacify the malformation. The mean number of access sites for each lesion averaged for the total number of sessions were as follows: grade 1 lesions, 1.8 sites (median, 2.0 sites; range, 1.0–4.0 sites); grade 2A lesions, 3.4 sites (median, 4.0 sites; range, 1.0–6.0 sites); grade 2B lesions, 3.9 sites (median, 3.0 sites; range, 1.0–12.0 sites); and grade 3 lesions, 6.5 sites (median, 5.0 sites; range, 1.0–17.0 sites). A linear regression on the logarithm of the number of puncture sites showed an increasing trend across grade (P < .001). No lesion recurred after initial clinical improvement or resolution during follow-up.

Complications were self-limiting in all cases and included skin necrosis in one patient and skin blistering in three patients. No definite association between complications and lesion grade was identified, and results of statistical evaluation would be inconclusive due to the small numbers. In our experience, very few patients experienced mild transient postprocedural pain and one patient required admission to the hospital for pain control with intravenous analgesics for less than 24 hours.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Percutaneous sclerosis, most commonly with ethanol administered by means of direct lesional puncture, has been reported (46) to provide some symptomatic relief in 74%–91% of patients. It is difficult to accurately compare our results of percutaneous sclerotherapy of VVMs with those of previous investigators (46,22,23). In prior studies, all lesions were compiled together regardless of morphology, including size and margins, because differentiation of lesion outcome was not the goal. In fact, to our knowledge, in only one study was reference made to the appearance of the VVMs and some distinction in the differences in treatment outcome. Dubois et al (4) used Ethibloc (Ethnor Laboratories/Ethicon, Neuily, France) as the sclerosing agent and achieved good results in 78% of localized lesions and 60% of diffuse lesions. Neither the definitions of localized and diffuse lesions nor the size of the malformations were provided; therefore; comparison with our results is difficult. We found good or excellent results in 64% of patients overall; these findings appear to be lower than those in the previous studies. However, after further evaluation of our data, good or excellent results were seen in 14 (100%) of 14 small well-defined lesions, 20 (87%) of 23 well-defined lesions regardless of size, and 15 (42%) of 36 ill-defined lesions. Findings in our study demonstrate that the outcome of ethanol sclerotherapy is variable and depends on the morphologic features of size and margins.

Although an excellent response was not seen in large infiltrating VVMs (grade 3), ethanol sclerotherapy proved beneficial in nine (43%) of the 21 patients with improved symptoms. Therefore, we believe ethanol sclerotherapy is a worthwhile treatment option in such patients. In addition, poor definition of a lesion is a poorer prognostic factor than is lesion size, as suggested by the results in our patients with grade 2 VVMs. However, the number of lesions in this category is too small to predict statistical significance.

Our results show a trend for the necessity to increase the number of repeat sclerotherapies, the mean volumes of ethanol and metrizamide mixture injected in each lesion during each sitting and over multiple sittings, and the number of access puncture sites with increasing lesion grade. These data may prove useful in procedure planning.

We studied an exclusively pediatric population. Various patient populations have been investigated in previous studies, including a similar population (4,6) and a mixed population of children and adults (2224). No substantial difference in outcomes is evident between these investigations.

Of the 59 patients in our study, four (7%) experienced self-limiting complications, including skin necrosis and skin blistering. In previous studies, complication rates ranged from 4% to 25%, including skin necrosis that was reversible or required skin grafting, blistering, and reversible neuropathy (4,2224). The complication rate in our study is within the range of rates in previous studies.

At our institution, patients with VVMs undergo evaluation in a multidisciplinary clinic that specializes in the treatment of vascular lesions. As part of their diagnostic work-up, most patients undergo MR imaging to help determine the diagnosis but, more important, to help determine the treatment plan. On the basis of our clinical experience and judgment, we question the potential usefulness of MR imaging to help predict outcome of VVMs treated with percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy. VVMs are difficult lesions to treat; therefore, it is important for treating physicians to be familiar with the potential successes and limitations of the proposed treatment when they determine appropriate candidates for such therapy and when they counsel patients and families about expected outcomes (7). Our proposed MR classification is based on clinical experience. The results in our study are preliminary and were obtained retrospectively in a relatively small number of patients. Further validation is needed.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate a strong association between the proposed MR classification and the results of percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy. An excellent response was seen in most small well-defined VVMs, and a poor result was seen in most large infiltrating lesions. Although poor results were seen in the majority of grade 3 lesions and none resolved with treatment, improvement in symptoms and lesion size was seen in some patients; therefore, we believe this is a potentially beneficial therapy.

These data may prove useful in the choice of appropriate patients for treatment and in the counseling of patients and families regarding realistic expectations of ethanol sclerosis therapy.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank George Tomlinson, PhD, for statistical analysis.


    FOOTNOTES
 
2 9*. Vascular system, location unspecified Back

Abbreviation: VVM = venous vascular malformation

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, M.G.; study concepts and design, M.G.; literature research, P.A.C.; clinical studies, D.A.; data acquisition, P.A.C., M.G.; data analysis/interpretation, M.G.; statistical analysis, M.G.; manuscript preparation, definition of intellectual content and editing, P.A.C.; manuscript revision/review, P.A.C., M.G.; manuscript final version approval, P.A.C., M.G., D.A.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69:412-422.[Medline]
  2. Kaban L, Mulliken JB. Vascular anomalies of the maxillofacial region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44:203-213.[Medline]
  3. Mulliken JB. Vascular birthmarks: hemangiomas and malformations Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1988; 301-342.
  4. Dubois JM, Sebag GH, De Prost Y, Teillac D, Chretien B, Brunelle FO. Soft-tissue venous malformations in children: percutaneous sclerotherapy with Ethibloc. Radiology 1991; 180:195-198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Yakes WF. Extremity venous malformations: diagnosis and management. Semin Intervent Radiol 1994; 11:332-339.
  6. O’Donovan JC, Donaldson JS, Morello FP, Pensler JM, Vogelzang RL, Bauer B. Symptomatic hemangiomas and venous malformations in infants, children, and young adults: treatment with percutaneous injection of sodium tetradecyl sulfate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:723-729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Trout HH, McAllister HA, Giordano JM, Rich NM. Vascular malformations. Surgery 1985; 97:36-41.[Medline]
  8. Bartlett JA, Riding KH, Salkeld LJ. Management of hemangiomas of the head and neck in children. J Otolaryngol 1988; 17:11-20.
  9. Sasaki GH, Pang CY, Wittliff JL. Pathogenesis and treatment of infant skin strawberry hemangiomas: clinical and in-vitro studies of hormonal effects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73:359-370.[Medline]
  10. Apfelberg DB, Maser MR, White DN, Lash H. A preliminary study of the combined effect of neodymium: YAG laser photocoagulation and direct steroid instillation in the treatment of capillary/cavernous hemangiomas of infancy. Ann Plast Surg 1989; 22:94-104.[Medline]
  11. Leikensohn JR, Epstein LI, Vasconez LO. Superselective embolization and surgery of noninvoluting hemangiomas and A-V malformations. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68:143-152.[Medline]
  12. Forbes G, Earnest F, Jackson IT, Marsh WR, Jack CR, Cross SA. Therapeutic embolization angiography for extra-axial lesions in the head. Mayo Clin Proc 1986; 61:427-441.[Medline]
  13. Jackson IT, Carreno R, Potparic Z, Hussain K. Hemangiomas, vascular malformations, and lymphovenous malformations: classification and methods of treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91:1216-1230.[Medline]
  14. Persky MS. Congenital vascular lesions of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 1986; 96:1002-1015.[Medline]
  15. Schrudde J, Petrovici V. Surgical treatment of giant hemangioma of the facial region after arterial embolization. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68:878-889.[Medline]
  16. Flye MW, Jordan BP, Schwartz MZ. Management of congenital arteriovenous malformations. Surgery 1983; 94:740-747.[Medline]
  17. Rak KM, Yakes WF, Ray RL, et al. MR imaging of symptomatic peripheral vascular malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159:107-112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Baker LL, Dillon WP, Hieshima GB, Dowd CF, Frieden IJ. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck: MR characterization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993; 14:307-314.[Abstract]
  19. Meyer JS, Hoffer FA, Barnes PD, Mulliken JB. Biological classification of soft-tissue vascular anomalies: MR correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157:559-564.[Free Full Text]
  20. Dobson MJ, Hartley RWJ, Ashleigh R, Watson Y, Hawnaur JM. MR angiography and MR imaging of symptomatic vascular malformations. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:595-602.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Yakes WF, Rossi P, Odink H. How I do it: arteriovenous malformation management. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996; 19:65-71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Yakes WF, Haas DK, Parker SH, et al. Symptomatic vascular malformations: ethanol embolotherapy. Radiology 1989; 170:1059-1066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Gomes AS. Embolization therapy of congenital arteriovenous malformations: use of alternate approaches. Radiology 1994; 190:191-198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Donnelly LF, Bisset GS, Adams DM. Combined sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance: a modified technique for percutaneous sclerosis of low-flow vascular malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:655-657.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Hyodoh, M. Hori, H. Akiba, M. Tamakawa, K. Hyodoh, and M. Hareyama
Peripheral Vascular Malformations: Imaging, Treatment Approaches, and Therapeutic Issues
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2005; 25(suppl_1): S159 - S171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
Y. O. Arat, M. E. Mawad, and M. Boniuk
Orbital Venous Malformations: Current Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2004; 122(8): 1151 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. U. Herborn, M. Goyen, T. C. Lauenstein, J. F. Debatin, S. G. Ruehm, and K. Kroger
Comprehensive Time-Resolved MRI of Peripheral Vascular Malformations
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 729 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2233010025v1
223/3/639    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goyal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goyal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE