|
|
||||||||
Editorials |
1 From the Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 530 First Ave, Basement Schwartz Bldg, New York, NY 10016. Received February 1, 2002; accepted February 6. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: glenn.krinsky@med.nyu.edu).
Index terms: Editorials Liver, cirrhosis, 761.794 Liver, nodules, 761.3198 Liver neoplams, 761.323 Radiology reporting systems
The cirrhotic liver is defined by the presence of nodules and fibrosis. A spectrum of nodules exists, ranging from the benign regenerative nodule to the malignant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prior to 1994, terminology existed with which the same nodule had multiple names. This resulted in confusion in interpreting investigators data in the pathology, radiology, and hepatology literature.
In 1994, the International Working Party on Terminology met at the World Congress of Gastroenterology to establish a single nomenclature that would eliminate this confusion. The new terminology for cirrhotic nodules was developed and published in 1995 (1) (Table). The terminology included the benign regenerative nodule, low- and high-grade dysplastic nodules, dysplastic nodule with subfocus of HCC, and HCC. This terminology was introduced in radiology literature in this journal in 1996 by Earls et al (2) and was accompanied by an editorial by Wu and Boitnott (3). At the time, it seemed that this simplified terminology would transcend cultural and geographic boundaries and result in a universal language that all radiologists could readily understand.
|
Why has the simplified terminology not gained universal use? One can only speculate that perhaps "old habits die hard." Alternatively, radiologists may be bound by the terminology used by their pathologists. However, the continued use of antiquated, potentially confusing terminology may hinder our ability to advance the study of cirrhotic nodules. In April 2002, a new consensus group on dysplastic nodules and HCC convened to reevaluate the Working Party terminology and will publish their results in the future. Until then, authors from all countries should adhere to the International Working Party Terminology when they submit relevant manuscripts to radiology journals.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Takayasu, Y. Muramatsu, Y. Mizuguchi, T. Okusaka, K. Shimada, T. Takayama, and M. Sakamoto CT Evaluation of the progression of hypoattenuating nodular lesions in virus-related chronic liver disease. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 454 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |