Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 12, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2251011298
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2251011298v1
225/1/143    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kadoya, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kadoya, M.
(Radiology 2002;225:143-149.)
© RSNA, 2002


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Progression to Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Correlation with Intranodular Blood Supply Evaluated with CT during Intraarterial Injection of Contrast Material1

Makiko Hayashi, MD, Osamu Matsui, MD, Kazuhiko Ueda, MD, Yasuhiro Kawamori, MD, Toshifumi Gabata, MD and Masumi Kadoya, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan (M.H., O.M., T.G.); Department of Radiology, Kouritsu Kaga Chuo Hospital, Kaga, Japan (K.U.); Department of Radiology, Kouseiren Takaoka Hospital, Takaoka, Japan (Y.K.); and Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan (M.K.). Received July 30, 2001; revision requested September 25; revision received December 19; accepted March 12, 2002. Supported in part by a grant-in-aid for cancer research (10-16) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. Address correspondence to M.H.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation between intranodular blood supply of borderline lesions (ie, dysplastic nodules or hypovascular well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] nodules) and their progression to hypervascular classic HCC in cirrhotic livers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-six borderline lesions seen at computed tomography (CT) during arterial portography (CTAP) and CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) were evaluated in 49 patients with cirrhosis who underwent repeated CTAP and/or CTHA but no therapy. On the basis of CTAP findings, nodules were categorized as group A (showing almost the same portal venous supply as the surrounding liver), group B (showing decreased portal venous supply) or group C (showing partially absent portal venous supply); on the basis of CTHA findings, nodules were categorized as group I (showing almost the same arterial supply as the liver), group II (showing decreased arterial supply), or group III (showing partially increased arterial supply).

RESULTS: Progression to classic HCC was observed in 29.4% of group A nodules, 53.9% of group B nodules, and 87.9% of group C nodules within 1,000 days; in 58.6% of group I nodules, 12.9% of group II nodules, and 92.2% of group III nodules within 730 days; and in 0% of nodules in group A and I, 28% of nodules in group B and/or II, and 88.7% of nodules in group C and/or III within 730 days.

CONCLUSION: Evaluation of intranodular blood supply was valuable in predicting the prognosis in borderline lesions, except when only arterial blood supply was evaluated.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Liver, CT, 761.12114, 761.12116 • Liver neoplasms, blood supply, 761.31, 761.323 • Liver neoplasms, diagnosis, 761.31, 761.323 • Liver, nodules, 761.3198


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually seen in cirrhotic livers, especially when cirrhosis is due to infection with hepatitis C or B virus. Therefore, it has become possible to detect small early-stage HCC nodules with periodic imaging in high-risk cirrhotic patients in areas with endemic hepatitis C or B virus infection (1). However, various other kinds of hepatocellular nodules are often also detected during evaluation for HCC, and differentiation among them is important in the care of patients with cirrhosis (26). These hepatocellular nodules are divided into two categories, namely, dysplastic nodules and HCC nodules, according to the classification proposed by the International Working Party of the World Congress of Gastroenterology (7).

A dysplastic nodule is defined as a nodular lesion of hepatocytes measuring at least 1 mm in diameter with dysplasia but without definite histologic criteria of malignancy; dysplastic nodules can be further classified into one of two subtypes: low grade and high grade. HCC is defined as a malignant neoplasm composed of cells with hepatocellular differentiation. Two types of hepatocarcinogenesis are now considered to cause HCC (2,810). One is de novo carcinogenesis and the other is the multistep development of (a) a dysplastic nodule to (b) a dysplastic nodule with malignant foci to (c) a well-differentiated HCC nodule to (d) definite classic HCC.

Percutaneous biopsy is quite effective for the precise diagnosis of these hepatocellular nodules. However, it is not always possible to perform percutaneous biopsy of these small nodules accurately, and the process of obtaining tissue samples from all multicentric or multifocal nodules is time-consuming and invasive to the patient. Therefore, it would be beneficial to be able to differentiate these nodules at imaging. For this purpose, we previously analyzed the correlation between the intranodular blood supply of these nodules, as evaluated with computed tomography (CT) during intraarterial injection of contrast material, and their histologic grade of malignancy (3,11). We found that the intranodular portal venous supply, as evaluated with CT during arterial portography (CTAP), gradually decreased, whereas the intranodular arterial supply, as evaluated with CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA), first decreased and then increased in accordance with an increase in the grade of malignancy of the hepatocellular nodule. As a result, it has become possible to estimate, with a high degree of confidence, the histologic grade of malignancy of nodules by evaluating the intranodular blood supply with imaging. However, in clinical practice, it is important to be able to estimate not only the histologic grade of malignancy but also the natural prognosis of the nodules.

Clinically, dysplastic nodules and hypovascular well-differentiated HCC nodules (defined as "borderline lesions" in this study) usually do not show any definite vascular invasion or metastasis to other organs, and therefore do not become life threatening in the absence of associated classic hypervascular HCC. Therefore, predicting the progression of a borderline lesion to hypervascular HCC is clinically important.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between the intranodular blood supply of borderline lesions, as evaluated with CT during intraarterial injection of contrast material, and their progression to hypervascular HCC in cirrhotic livers.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our institution does not require its approval or informed consent for reviewing patient records and images. In this retrospective study, 176 hepatocellular nodules with a maximum diameter of 0.8–3.0 cm (mean, 1.2 cm) that had been diagnosed as borderline lesions at CTAP and/or CTHA according to previously reported criteria (11) were evaluated in 49 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who underwent repeated CTAP and/or CTHA examinations at more than 6-month intervals over a 6-year period. The patients were 17 men and 32 women aged 39–79 years (mean, 63 years). Liver cirrhosis was related to hepatitis B virus in five patients, hepatitis C virus in 40, hepatitis B and C viruses in two, and alcoholism in two. Only nodules that could be observed without any biopsy examination or local ablation therapy were included in this study.

Repeated CTAP examinations were performed in all 176 nodules and repeated CTHA examinations were performed in 131 nodules. In 99 nodules, both CTAP and CTHA were performed repeatedly. Fifty-seven of 176 nodules were not detected at ultrasonography (US), CT, or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and were visualized only at CTAP and/or CTHA. The equipment and techniques used in the US, CT, and MR imaging examinations, which were performed not only at our hospital but also at many other referring hospitals, varied; therefore, the rates of detection of these nodules with US, CT, and MR imaging were not analyzed. The observation period was 186–2,167 days (average, 465 days) after CTAP and 186–911 days (average, 450 days) after CTHA. Repeated CTAP and/or CTHA examinations were performed during repeated transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with coexisting classic hypervascular HCC. The interval between each transcatheter arterial embolization session in individual patients varied, ranging from 6 to 20 months (average, 7 months).

CTAP and CTHA were performed in the CT room after hepatic angiography with a digital subtraction angiography system had been completed in the angiography room. For hepatic angiography, about 30 mL of iohexol (350 mg of iodine per milliliter, Omnipaque; Daiichi, Tokyo, Japan) was used. When both CTAP and CTHA were performed, two 4-F catheters were inserted via the ipsilateral common femoral artery with separate punctures.

Conventional CTAP scans were obtained with a 9800 HiLight unit (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) in 10 patients. CTAP was performed in 39 patients with a HiSpeed Advantage unit (GE Medical Systems) with slip-ring technology, 7-mm-thick sections, and 7-mm collimation. The duration of scanning was around 20–25 seconds (during a single breath hold), for a total scanned length of 14–18 cm. Overlapping reconstructions were obtained every 3.5 mm. Helical scanning began 25 seconds after the beginning of an infusion of 60 mL of iohexol (320 mg of iodine per milliliter) at a rate of 1.5 mL/sec.

CTHA scans were obtained with 3-mm-thick sections, 3-mm collimation, and 1.5-mm reconstruction intervals. For CTAP, 20 µg of prostaglandin E1 (Prostandin; Ono, Tokyo, Japan) was injected into the superior mesenteric artery immediately before injection of contrast medium (iohexol, Omnipaque; Daiichi). The CTHA study was divided into two series for scanning the relatively large liver. CTHA scanning began 10 seconds after the start of an injection of iohexol (320 mg of iodine per milliliter) at 1 mL/sec through the 4-F angiographic catheter placed in the common or proper hepatic artery; the infusion was continued throughout scanning.

A diagnosis of hepatocellular nodule was rendered when US, CT, MR imaging, CTAP, and/or CTHA depicted a round distinct nodule larger than 8 mm in widest diameter that was distinguishable from cyst and cavernous hemangioma in cirrhotic livers.

As we reported previously (11), the CTAP findings in the hepatocellular nodules were classified into four groups in which the appearance of a nodule was characterized relative to the appearance of surrounding cirrhotic liver (Fig 1). Group A nodules were not visualized (ie, they were isoattenuating), indicating the presence of almost the same intranodular portal venous blood supply in the nodule as in the liver itself. Group B nodules were visualized as slightly hypoattenuating areas (ie, attenuation in the nodule was higher than that in the intrahepatic inferior vena cava, into which no contrast medium flowed during scanning) relative to the surrounding liver parenchyma, indicating decreased but not absent intranodular portal venous blood flow. Group C nodules were visualized as partially hypoattenuating areas (ie, attenuation in this area was lower than that in the intrahepatic inferior vena cava), indicating a partially absent intranodular portal venous blood supply. In group D nodules, the greater part (more than half) of the nodule was visualized as a markedly hypoattenuating area (ie, entire nodule was more hypoattenuating than the inferior vena cava), indicating an absent intranodular portal venous supply.



View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. Transverse CTAP images illustrate the groups of findings seen in hepatocellular nodules with this modality. (a) Group B nodule appears as a slightly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). (b) Group C nodule appears as a slightly hypoattenuating nodule with a partial internal focus (arrow) of definite hypoattenuation. (c) Group D nodule appears as a markedly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow).

 


View larger version (178K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. Transverse CTAP images illustrate the groups of findings seen in hepatocellular nodules with this modality. (a) Group B nodule appears as a slightly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). (b) Group C nodule appears as a slightly hypoattenuating nodule with a partial internal focus (arrow) of definite hypoattenuation. (c) Group D nodule appears as a markedly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow).

 


View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1c. Transverse CTAP images illustrate the groups of findings seen in hepatocellular nodules with this modality. (a) Group B nodule appears as a slightly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). (b) Group C nodule appears as a slightly hypoattenuating nodule with a partial internal focus (arrow) of definite hypoattenuation. (c) Group D nodule appears as a markedly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow).

 
The CTHA findings were also categorized into four groups in which the appearance of the nodule was characterized relative to the appearance of surrounding cirrhotic liver (Fig 2). Group I nodules were not visualized (ie, they were isoattenuating), indicating the presence of almost the same intranodular arterial blood supply in the nodule as in the liver itself. Group II nodules were visualized as hypoattenuating areas, indicating a decreased intranodular arterial blood supply. In group III nodules, part of the nodule showed hyperattenuation, indicating a partially increased intranodular arterial blood supply. In group IV nodules, the greater part (more than half) of the nodule was visualized as a hyperattenuating area, indicating an increased intranodular arterial blood supply.



View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Transverse CTHA images illustrate groups of findings seen in hepatocellular nodules with this modality. (a) Group II nodule appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). (b) Group III nodule appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with an internal partially hyperattenuating focus. (c) Group IV nodule appears as a hyperattenuating nodule (arrow).

 


View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Transverse CTHA images illustrate groups of findings seen in hepatocellular nodules with this modality. (a) Group II nodule appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). (b) Group III nodule appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with an internal partially hyperattenuating focus. (c) Group IV nodule appears as a hyperattenuating nodule (arrow).

 


View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. Transverse CTHA images illustrate groups of findings seen in hepatocellular nodules with this modality. (a) Group II nodule appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). (b) Group III nodule appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with an internal partially hyperattenuating focus. (c) Group IV nodule appears as a hyperattenuating nodule (arrow).

 
There was a statistically significant correlation between the four groups of CTAP findings and the grade of malignancy of the nodules. Namely, there were correlations between low-grade dysplastic nodules and group A nodules, high-grade dysplastic nodules and group B nodules, well-differentiated HCC and group C nodules, and moderately or poorly differentiated HCC (classic HCC) and group D nodules (P < .05, Fisher exact probability test). With CTHA findings, there was a statistically significant correlation between classic HCC and group IV nodules (P < .05, Fisher exact probability test), with low-grade dysplastic nodules tending to appear in group I, high-grade dysplastic nodules tending to appear in group II, and well-differentiated HCC tending to appear group III, with varying degrees of overlap.

There was a strong tendency that a nodule categorized as a group D nodule at CTAP was categorized as a group IV nodule at CTHA and a group C nodule was categorized as a group III nodule. However, group A nodules were classified as group I or group II without a definite tendency, and group B nodules demonstrated variable types of intranodular portal venous supply (11). The nodules categorized as group D at CTAP and/or group IV at CTHA usually proved to be moderately or poorly differentiated HCC, and, in clinical practice, only these nodules show metastasis and/or definite vascular invasion (ie, are clinically malignant).

Therefore, nodules categorized as group A, B, or C at CTAP and as group I, II, or III at CTHA were defined as borderline lesions in this study. When findings at initial CTAP and/or CTHA changed to those characteristic of group D or IV nodules at repeat CTAP or CTHA, the nodule was considered to have transformed into a clinically malignant nodule (malignant transformation).

The patterns of intranodular blood supply evaluated with CTAP and CTHA were classified into three groups as described in previous paragraphs, and the malignant transformation ratio was compared in each group. The ratio was also analyzed in comparison with combined findings at CTAP and CTHA in the nodules in which both CTAP and CTHA were performed at the same time throughout the series of CT examinations. The groups of CTAP and CTHA findings were retrospectively determined in consensus by three experienced radiologists (M.H., O.M., and K.U.) without knowledge of the final outcome of the nodules.

In each group of CTAP findings, CTHA findings, and the combination of CTAP and CTHA findings, the malignant transformation ratio was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared. The end point of observation for each nodule was the day of the CTAP or CTHA examination that revealed malignant transformation or the day of the last CTAP or CTHA examination performed. The observation period was defined as the number of days between the first CTAP or CTHA examination and the end point in this study. Differences in the malignant transformation ratio between each group were compared with the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) method.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Of 176 nodules which were examined repeatedly with CTAP, 95 were categorized as group A at the first examination, 47 were categorized as group B, and 34 were categorized as group C. Figure 3 shows the non–malignant transformation ratios (ie, the proportion of lesions that did not become malignant) calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method in each group of CTAP findings. The malignant transformation ratio (calculated as 100% minus the non–malignant transformation ratio) was 29.4% in group A nodules, 53.9% in group B nodules (Fig 4), and 87.9% in group C nodules (Fig 5) within 1,000 days. The differences in non–malignant transformation ratios among nodules in groups A, B, and C were statistically significant (P < .001).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Graph shows non-malignant transformation curves (calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method) for nodules categorized at CTAP as group A, B, and C.

 


View larger version (202K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. Transverse images in a nodule show its multistep malignant transformation during 27 months of follow-up. (a) CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating (group II) nodule (arrow). (b) CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating (group B) nodule (arrow). (c) CTHA image obtained 15 months after a shows internal hyperattenuating foci (arrow) in the nodule, which is now classified as a group III nodule. (d) CTAP image obtained at the same time as c demonstrates internal hypoattenuating foci in the nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group C nodule. (e) CTHA image obtained 12 months after c reveals definite hyperattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group IV nodule. (f) CTAP image obtained at the same time as e demonstrates definite hypoattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group D nodule. This nodule was followed up because it was not detected with US and coexisted with classic hypervascular HCC.

 


View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. Transverse images in a nodule show its multistep malignant transformation during 27 months of follow-up. (a) CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating (group II) nodule (arrow). (b) CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating (group B) nodule (arrow). (c) CTHA image obtained 15 months after a shows internal hyperattenuating foci (arrow) in the nodule, which is now classified as a group III nodule. (d) CTAP image obtained at the same time as c demonstrates internal hypoattenuating foci in the nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group C nodule. (e) CTHA image obtained 12 months after c reveals definite hyperattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group IV nodule. (f) CTAP image obtained at the same time as e demonstrates definite hypoattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group D nodule. This nodule was followed up because it was not detected with US and coexisted with classic hypervascular HCC.

 


View larger version (197K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4c. Transverse images in a nodule show its multistep malignant transformation during 27 months of follow-up. (a) CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating (group II) nodule (arrow). (b) CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating (group B) nodule (arrow). (c) CTHA image obtained 15 months after a shows internal hyperattenuating foci (arrow) in the nodule, which is now classified as a group III nodule. (d) CTAP image obtained at the same time as c demonstrates internal hypoattenuating foci in the nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group C nodule. (e) CTHA image obtained 12 months after c reveals definite hyperattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group IV nodule. (f) CTAP image obtained at the same time as e demonstrates definite hypoattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group D nodule. This nodule was followed up because it was not detected with US and coexisted with classic hypervascular HCC.

 


View larger version (195K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4d. Transverse images in a nodule show its multistep malignant transformation during 27 months of follow-up. (a) CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating (group II) nodule (arrow). (b) CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating (group B) nodule (arrow). (c) CTHA image obtained 15 months after a shows internal hyperattenuating foci (arrow) in the nodule, which is now classified as a group III nodule. (d) CTAP image obtained at the same time as c demonstrates internal hypoattenuating foci in the nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group C nodule. (e) CTHA image obtained 12 months after c reveals definite hyperattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group IV nodule. (f) CTAP image obtained at the same time as e demonstrates definite hypoattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group D nodule. This nodule was followed up because it was not detected with US and coexisted with classic hypervascular HCC.

 


View larger version (177K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4e. Transverse images in a nodule show its multistep malignant transformation during 27 months of follow-up. (a) CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating (group II) nodule (arrow). (b) CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating (group B) nodule (arrow). (c) CTHA image obtained 15 months after a shows internal hyperattenuating foci (arrow) in the nodule, which is now classified as a group III nodule. (d) CTAP image obtained at the same time as c demonstrates internal hypoattenuating foci in the nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group C nodule. (e) CTHA image obtained 12 months after c reveals definite hyperattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group IV nodule. (f) CTAP image obtained at the same time as e demonstrates definite hypoattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group D nodule. This nodule was followed up because it was not detected with US and coexisted with classic hypervascular HCC.

 


View larger version (192K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4f. Transverse images in a nodule show its multistep malignant transformation during 27 months of follow-up. (a) CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating (group II) nodule (arrow). (b) CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating (group B) nodule (arrow). (c) CTHA image obtained 15 months after a shows internal hyperattenuating foci (arrow) in the nodule, which is now classified as a group III nodule. (d) CTAP image obtained at the same time as c demonstrates internal hypoattenuating foci in the nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group C nodule. (e) CTHA image obtained 12 months after c reveals definite hyperattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group IV nodule. (f) CTAP image obtained at the same time as e demonstrates definite hypoattenuation in the entire nodule (arrow), which is now classified as a group D nodule. This nodule was followed up because it was not detected with US and coexisted with classic hypervascular HCC.

 


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5a. Transverse images in a nodule initially classified as group III and group C show malignant transformation during 12 months of follow-up. (a) Initial CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with internal hyperattenuating foci (group III nodule). (b) Initial CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with internal foci of definite hypoattenuation (group C nodule). (c) CTHA and (d) CTAP images obtained 12 months after a and b reveal a group IV nodule (arrow), indicating malignant transformation.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5b. Transverse images in a nodule initially classified as group III and group C show malignant transformation during 12 months of follow-up. (a) Initial CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with internal hyperattenuating foci (group III nodule). (b) Initial CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with internal foci of definite hypoattenuation (group C nodule). (c) CTHA and (d) CTAP images obtained 12 months after a and b reveal a group IV nodule (arrow), indicating malignant transformation.

 


View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5c. Transverse images in a nodule initially classified as group III and group C show malignant transformation during 12 months of follow-up. (a) Initial CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with internal hyperattenuating foci (group III nodule). (b) Initial CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with internal foci of definite hypoattenuation (group C nodule). (c) CTHA and (d) CTAP images obtained 12 months after a and b reveal a group IV nodule (arrow), indicating malignant transformation.

 


View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5d. Transverse images in a nodule initially classified as group III and group C show malignant transformation during 12 months of follow-up. (a) Initial CTHA image shows a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with internal hyperattenuating foci (group III nodule). (b) Initial CTAP image reveals a slightly hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) with internal foci of definite hypoattenuation (group C nodule). (c) CTHA and (d) CTAP images obtained 12 months after a and b reveal a group IV nodule (arrow), indicating malignant transformation.

 
Of 131 nodules examined with repeated CTHA, 24 were categorized as group I at the first examination, 64 were categorized as group II, and 43 were categorized as group III. Figure 6 shows non–malignant transformation ratios calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method in each group of CTHA findings. The calculated malignant transformation ratio was 58.6% for group I nodules, 12.9% for group II nodules (Figs 4, 7), and 92.2% for group III nodules (Fig 5) within 730 days. The differences in non–malignant transformation ratios among group I, group II, and group III nodules were statistically significant (P < .001).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Graph shows non-malignant transformation curves (calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method) for nodules categorized at CTHA (CTA) as group I, II, and III.

 


View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7a. Transverse images in a nodule that demonstrated no malignant transformation during 25 months of follow-up. (a) Initial CTHA image reveals a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) of about 1.0 cm in diameter (group II nodule). (b) CTAP image obtained at the same time as a shows an isoattenuating area (arrow) that is not visible as an actual nodule (group A nodule). (c) CTHA image obtained 25 months after a reveals that the nodule still appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). The diameter of the nodule was slightly increased.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7b. Transverse images in a nodule that demonstrated no malignant transformation during 25 months of follow-up. (a) Initial CTHA image reveals a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) of about 1.0 cm in diameter (group II nodule). (b) CTAP image obtained at the same time as a shows an isoattenuating area (arrow) that is not visible as an actual nodule (group A nodule). (c) CTHA image obtained 25 months after a reveals that the nodule still appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). The diameter of the nodule was slightly increased.

 


View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7c. Transverse images in a nodule that demonstrated no malignant transformation during 25 months of follow-up. (a) Initial CTHA image reveals a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow) of about 1.0 cm in diameter (group II nodule). (b) CTAP image obtained at the same time as a shows an isoattenuating area (arrow) that is not visible as an actual nodule (group A nodule). (c) CTHA image obtained 25 months after a reveals that the nodule still appears as a hypoattenuating nodule (arrow). The diameter of the nodule was slightly increased.

 
Ninety-nine nodules that were evaluated with both CTAP and CTHA at the first examination and at all of the subsequent examinations were divided into three groups according to the combination of CTAP and CTHA findings. Among them, eight were categorized as group A at CTAP and group I at CTHA; these were designated group A-I nodules. Sixty-one nodules were categorized as showing findings characteristic of group B or group II nodules without showing findings characteristic of group C or group III nodules; these were designated group B-II nodules. The remaining 30 nodules were categorized as group C and/or group III; these were designated group C-III nodules. Figure 8 shows non–malignant transformation ratios evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method in these groups. The calculated malignant transformation ratio was 0% within 730 days in the nodules classified as group A-I. On the other hand, it was 28% in the group B-II nodules (Figs 4, 7), and 88.7% in the group C-III nodules (Fig 5). The differences in the non–malignant transformation ratios among these three groups were significant (P < .001).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8. Graph shows non-malignant transformation curves (calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method) for each group of nodules categorized according to combined CTAP and CTHA findings.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Various kinds of hepatocellular nodules, from low-grade dysplastic nodules to overt HCC, are seen in cirrhotic livers, especially when cirrhosis is due to infection with hepatitis C or B virus; these nodules are often multicentric (2,6,7,911). Knowing the grade of malignancy or the biologic nature of these nodules is essential for the adequate care of patients with cirrhosis. As previously reported, the evaluation of intranodular blood supply with imaging is valuable for estimating the grade of malignancy of such nodules (3,5,1113). However, correlation between the imaging findings and biologic nature of these nodules has not been sufficiently analyzed. In this study, we compared the patterns of intranodular blood supply, as demonstrated at CTAP and CTHA, with the prognosis (ie, natural history) of hepatocellular nodules to confirm the usefulness of our previously reported concept (3,11) and to evaluate the biologic nature of the various kinds of hepatocellular nodules.

Clinically, almost all HCCs with metastases or vascular invasion are hypervascular relative to the surrounding liver on color Doppler US images and during the arterial-dominant phase of dynamic CT and MR imaging, hepatic arteriography, and CTHA. In addition, almost all HCCs show a definite portal venous perfusion defect at CTAP. On the other hand, hypo- or isovascular well-differentiated HCCs or borderline lesions with intranodular portal venous blood supply usually do not demonstrate any overt metastases or vascular invasion and therefore are considered to be clinically benign. For these reasons, the change of a hypovascular nodule with intranodular portal venous blood supply to a hypervascular nodule with an intranodular portal venous perfusion defect in more than half of the nodule was defined as "malignant transformation."

In terms of CTAP findings, the malignant transformation ratio was lowest in the nodules with almost the same intranodular portal venous blood supply as the surrounding liver (group A), followed by those with decreased but not absent intranodular portal venous blood supply (group B) and those with partially absent intranodular portal venous blood supply (group C). Only 30% of group A nodules showed malignant transformation within 3 years, in contrast to at least 90% of group C nodules. These observations were consistent with our previous results, which revealed the radiologic and histologic correlation that the intranodular portal venous blood supply in hepatocellular nodules gradually decreases in accordance with an increasing grade of malignancy (3,11,12). Therefore, we believe that the usefulness of the evaluation of intranodular portal venous blood supply with imaging in estimating the grade of malignancy of hepatocellular nodules was reconfirmed in this follow-up study.

In terms of CTHA findings, the malignant transformation ratio was higher in nodules with almost the same intranodular arterial blood supply as the surrounding liver (group I) than in those with decreased intranodular arterial blood supply (group II); these two groups showed at least 50% and 20% malignant transformation within 3 years, respectively. As we reported previously, isoattenuation at CTHA (as is demonstrated by group I nodules) can indicate two different conditions—(a) the presence of a large regenerative nodule or low-grade dysplastic nodule in which almost the same arterial supply relative to the surrounding liver is present through a normal hepatic artery or (b) the presence of a high-grade dysplastic nodule or well-differentiated HCC in which an increased abnormal arterial supply compensates for a decreased normal arterial supply (11). We surmise that a relatively large number of more malignant nodules were included among the group I nodules in this study. These results indicate that the evaluation of intranodular arterial blood supply alone is unreliable in predicting the grade of malignancy or the prognosis of group I nodules. On the other hand, all nodules with partially increased arterial blood supply (ie, group III nodules) showed malignant transformation within 3 years.

In terms of the combination of CTAP and CTHA findings, nodules with almost the same intranodular portal venous and arterial blood supply (group A-I) demonstrated no definite malignant transformation, although the number of such nodules was small. On the other hand, at least 30% of the nodules with decreased intranodular portal venous or arterial supply (group B-II) showed malignant transformation within 3 years, as did all of the nodules with partially absent intranodular portal venous supply or partially increased intranodular arterial supply (group C-III). These results were in close agreement with those of our previous radiologic and histologic correlation studies (3,11,12), in which type A-I nodules usually proved to be low-grade dysplastic nodules that were benign in nature.

This study revealed a significant correlation between the intranodular blood supply, as evaluated with CTAP and CTHA, and the prognosis (biologic nature) of hepatocellular nodules associated with liver cirrhosis. Malignant transformation of hepatocellular nodules has been studied in nodules histologically diagnosed at biopsy. Takayama et al (14) reported that nine of 18 biopsy-proved adenomatous hyperplasias transformed to overt HCC within 1–5 years (14). However, to the best of our knowledge, no researchers have yet analyzed the correlation between intranodular blood supply evaluated specifically with CTAP and CTHA and the natural history of a large number of hepatocellular nodules. The results obtained in this study are useful in the clinical management of these nodules, especially when such nodules coexist with overt hypervascular HCC in cirrhotic livers. According to the results obtained in this study, hypovascular hepatocellular nodules with internal portal venous supply can be followed up until an internal focus of hypervascularity appears. However, CTAP and CTHA are invasive examinations; therefore, attempts to visualize intranodular portal venous supply and faint intranodular arterial vascularity with color Doppler US and dynamic CT and MR imaging should be continued. In the future, contrast material–enhanced US (15) and dynamic multisection helical CT will become useful methods for evaluating intranodular arterial and portal venous blood supply. At that time, the findings obtained in this study will be widely applicable to clinical practice.

There were some limitations in this study. One was that there was no pathologic proof for the nodules evaluated in this study. However, one of the major purposes of this study was to define standard criteria for predicting the prognosis of borderline lesions with imaging but without biopsy. Another limitation was the lack of a standard time for follow-up examinations in patients within each of the groups. However, because CTAP and CTHA were performed during transcatheter arterial embolization therapy for coexisting classic HCC, it was impossible to make the period between these examinations standard.

In conclusion, there was a significant correlation between intranodular blood supply evaluated with CT during intraarterial injection of contrast material and prognosis in hepatocellular nodules associated with liver cirrhosis. Almost all of the nodules with partially absent intranodular portal venous blood supply or partially increased intranodular arterial supply transformed to hypervascular classic HCC within 3 years. On the other hand, nodules with almost the same intranodular portal venous and arterial blood supply as the surrounding liver did not show any transformation to hypervascular HCC, and only 30% of nodules with decreased portal venous or arterial blood supply demonstrated malignant transformation. Evaluation of only intranodular arterial blood supply was unreliable in predicting the prognosis of nodules without a hypervascular focus. We believe such information to be clinically useful in the care of cirrhotic patients with such nodules.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: CTAP = computed tomography during arterial portography, CTHA = computed tomography during hepatic arteriography, HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, all authors; study concepts, M.H., O.M.; study design, O.M.; literature research, M.H.; clinical studies, all authors; data acquisition and analysis/interpretation, M.H., O.M.; statistical analysis, M.H., Y.K.; manuscript preparation, M.H.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, all authors; manuscript editing, M.H.; manuscript revision/review, O.M.; manuscript final version approval, all authors.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Unoura M, Kaneko S, Matsushita E, et al. High-risk groups and screening strategies for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease. Hepatogastroenterology 1993; 40:305-310.[Medline]
  2. Nakanuma Y, Terada T, Terasaki S, et al. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia in liver cirrhosis: low-grade hepatocellular carcinoma or borderline lesion? Histopathology 1990; 17:27-35.[Medline]
  3. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, et al. Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply. Radiology 1991; 178:493-497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, et al. Adenomatous hyperplastic nodules in the cirrhotic liver: differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 173:123-126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y, Furukawa H, et al. Early hepatocellular carcinoma: appearance at CT during arterial portography and CT arteriography with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 194:101-105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer 4th ed. Tokyo, Japan: Kanahara, 2000; 30-34[Japanese].
  7. International Working Party. Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology 1995; 22:983-993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Arakawa M, Kage M, Sugihara S, Nakashima T, Suenaga M, Okuda K. Emergence of malignant lesions within an adenomatous hyperplastic nodule in a cirrhotic liver: observations in five cases. Gastroenterology 1986; 91:198-208.[Medline]
  9. Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y. Early stages of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: adenomatous hyperplasia and early hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1991; 22:172-178.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S, Tsuda H, Shimosato Y, Makuuchi M, Hosoda Y. Multicentric independent development of hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by analysis of hepatitis B virus integration pattern. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13:1064-1067.[Medline]
  11. Hayashi M, Matsui O, Ueda K, et al. Correlation between the blood supply and grade of malignancy of hepatocellular nodules associated with liver cirrhosis: evaluation by CT during intraarterial injection of contrast medium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:969-976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ueda K, Terada T, Nakanuma Y, Matsui O. Vascular supply in adenomatous hyperplasia of the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma: a morphometric study. Hum Pathol 1992; 23:619-626.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kudo M, Tomita S, Tochio H, et al. Sonography with intraarterial infusion of carbon dioxide microbubbles (sonographic angiography): value in differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158:65-74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Hirohashi S, et al. Malignant transformation of adenomatous hyperplasia to hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 1990; 336:1150-1153.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, Suetomi Y, Minami Y, Maekawa K. Contrast-enhanced subtraction harmonic sonography for evaluating treatment response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:661-666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-J. Chung, J. S. Yu, J. H. Kim, M.-J. Kim, and K. W. Kim
Nonhypervascular Hypoattenuating Nodules Depicted on Either Portal or Equilibrium Phase Multiphasic CT Images in the Cirrhotic Liver
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 207 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Nakaura, K. Awai, Y. Yanaga, Y. Nakayama, S. Oda, Y. Funama, and Y. Yamashita
Detection of Early Enhancement of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Single Breath-Hold 3D Pixel Shift Dynamic Subtraction MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W13 - W18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Quaia, M. D'Onofrio, P. Cabassa, F. Vecchiato, S. Caffarri, F. Pittiani, K. M. Wittkowski, and M. A. Cova
Diagnostic Value of Hepatocellular Nodule Vascularity After Microbubble Injection for Characterizing Malignancy in Patients with Cirrhosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1474 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Enhancement Patterns of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Contrast-enhanced US: Comparison with Histologic Differentiation
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 898 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Steel, D. A. Geller, T. C. Gamblin, M. C. Olek, and B. I. Carr
Depression, Immunity, and Survival in Patients With Hepatobiliary Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2007; 25(17): 2397 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G-J Liu, H-X Xu, M-D Lu, X-Y Xie, Z-F Xu, Y-L Zheng, and J-Y Liang
Correlation between enhancement pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma on real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tumour cellular differentiation on histopathology
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 80(953): 321 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H. Yang, G.-J. Liu, M.-D. Lu, H.-X. Xu, and X.-Y. Xie
Evaluation of the Vascular Architecture of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Micro Flow Imaging: Pathologic Correlation
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2007; 26(4): 461 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Monzawa, T. Ichikawa, H. Nakajima, Y. Kitanaka, K. Omata, and T. Araki
Dynamic CT for Detecting Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Usefulness of Delayed Phase Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 147 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Takayasu, Y. Muramatsu, Y. Mizuguchi, T. Okusaka, K. Shimada, T. Takayama, and M. Sakamoto
CT Evaluation of the progression of hypoattenuating nodular lesions in virus-related chronic liver disease.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 454 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Quaia, A. Palumbo, S. Rossi, F. Degobbis, S. Cernic, G. Tona, and M. Cova
Comparison of visual and quantitative analysis for characterization of insonated liver tumors after microbubble contrast injection.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1560 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. K. Kim, H. S. Kwak, C. S. Kim, G. H. Chung, Y. M. Han, and J. M. Lee
Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: Comparison of SPIO-enhanced MR Imaging and 16-Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2381042193.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Shinmura, O. Matsui, S. Kobayashi, N. Terayama, J. Sanada, K. Ueda, T. Gabata, M. Kadoya, and S. Miyayama
Cirrhotic Nodules: Association between MR Imaging Signal Intensity and Intranodular Blood Supply
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 512 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. R. Aberle, C. Chiles, C. Gatsonis, B. J. Hillman, C. D. Johnson, B. L. McClennan, D. G. Mitchell, E. D. Pisano, M. D. Schnall, and A. G. Sorensen
Imaging and Cancer: Research Strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 741 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Qayyum, A. Graser, A. Westphalen, R. B. Merriman, L. D. Ferrell, B. M. Yeh, and F. V. Coakley
CT of Benign Hypervascular Liver Nodules in Autoimmune Hepatitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1573 - 1576.