Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2261011827
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kang, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.
(Radiology 2003;226:79-85.)
© RSNA, 2003


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Preoperative Depiction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR Imaging versus Triple-Phase Helical CT1

Bo Kiung Kang, MD, Jae Hoon Lim, MD, Seung Hoon Kim, MD, Dongil Choi, MD, Hyo Keun Lim, MD, Won Jae Lee, MD and Soon Jin Lee, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul 135-710, Korea. Received November 14, 2001; revision requested January 24, 2002; revision received March 5; accepted April 16. Address correspondence to J.H.L. (e-mail: jhlim@smc.samsung.co.kr).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To compare ferumoxides-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with triple-phase helical computed tomography (CT) for the preoperative depiction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients with a total of 79 HCC nodules underwent ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging and triple-phase helical CT before surgery. The diagnosis of HCC was established by means of pathologic examination after surgical resection in all patients. MR images obtained with all sequences and triple-phase helical CT images were reviewed independently by three radiologists on a segment-by-segment basis. Accuracy for diagnosis of HCC was assessed by applying receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to observations of 78 hepatic segments with at least one HCC nodule and 70 segments without HCC.

RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of findings at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging (with mean area-under-the-ROC-curve [Az] values for the three observers of 0.986, 0.979, and 0.980) was significantly higher (P < .001) than that of findings at triple-phase helical CT (with mean Az values for the three observers of 0.945, 0.948, and 0.964). The mean sensitivity of MR imaging (95%, 222 of 234 segments) was also significantly higher than that of triple-phase helical CT (88%, 205 of 234 segments) (P = .001, McNemar test). The mean specificity was 97% (261 of 270 segments) for MR imaging and 98% (264 of 270 segments) for CT, but this difference was not significant (P = .754, McNemar test).

CONCLUSION: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging is superior to triple-phase helical CT for the preoperative depiction of HCC.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), phase imaging, 761.12114 • Iron • Liver neoplasms, CT, 761.12114 • Liver neoplasms, MR, 761.12143 • Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast media, 761.12143 • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In spite of the advent of newer treatment modalities, surgical resection is still considered the principal treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the preoperative evaluation of HCC, imaging methods that can reliably depict all malignant intrahepatic lesions are necessary, because imaging findings affect the choice of surgical procedure. The introduction of helical computed tomography (CT) has improved the detection and characterization of liver neoplasms, and multiphasic helical CT scanning is considered by some as the preferred modality for the preoperative examination of patients with hepatic tumors, particularly HCC (15).

The usefulness of ferumoxides-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been reported for detection of hepatic tumors, including HCC (68). Ferumoxides particles coated with dextran and administered intravenously are ingested by macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system, including the Kupffer cells of the liver; this results in signal intensity loss in normal liver tissue (9). Kupffer cells are lacking or markedly decreased in number in most malignant tumors of the liver and therefore retain their signal intensity after ferumoxides administration, resulting in the improvement of lesion-to-liver contrast (913). Some investigators have suggested that ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging is more accurate than dual-phase helical CT for the detection of focal liver lesions (1416). The purpose of this study was to compare ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging with triple-phase helical CT for the preoperative depiction of HCC.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
Between March 1999 and May 2001, we performed triple-phase helical CT and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of 214 consecutive patients suspected of having HCC on the basis of ultrasonographic (US) findings and elevated {alpha}-fetoprotein levels. Among these patients, a total of 70 consecutive individuals (59 men and 11 women; age range, 30–76 years; mean age, 52 years) who had pathologically proved HCC at hepatic resection surgery were selected for this study.

The criterion for selecting a patient for hepatic resection surgery was the presence of a tumor or a number of tumors of any size limited to one lobe of a liver with Child-Pugh class A function. The following surgeries were performed within 3 weeks after the imaging studies: segmentectomy (n = 35), lobectomy (n = 33), extended right lobectomy (n = 1), and liver transplantation (n = 1). A total of 175 hepatic segments were resected. Surgeons confirmed the absence of tumor in any nodule thought to be suspicious at imaging by means of palpation and intraoperative US. The resected specimens were serially sliced with 5–10-mm thicknesses in the transverse or coronal plane, depending on the location of a nodule.

Seventy-nine HCC nodules in 78 segments were confirmed at pathologic examination. HCC nodules ranged from 0.6 to 12.5 cm in diameter (mean, 3.9 cm). In 45 (64%) of the 70 patients, liver cirrhosis was confirmed at histopathologic examination of the resected portion of the hepatic parenchyma. Eight of the 70 patients had hepatitis B virus–related chronic active hepatitis, and two of the 70 patients had hepatitis C virus–related chronic persistent hepatitis. The liver was normal histopathologically, with no hepatitis or cirrhosis, in 15 of the 70 patients. This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Triple-Phase Helical CT
CT was performed with a helical scanner (HiSpeed Advantage; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). Scanning parameters were 120 kVp, 180 mAs, 7-mm section collimation, and 7-mm/sec table speed during a single-breath-hold helical acquisition of 25–30 seconds (depending on liver size). Images were obtained in a craniocaudal direction and were reconstructed every 7 mm to provide contiguous sections. The hepatic arterial phase, portal venous phase, and delayed phase images were obtained with delays of 30, 60, and 180 seconds, respectively, after injection of 100 mL of nonionic iodinated contrast material (iopamidol, Iopamiro 300; Bracco, Milan, Italy) through the antecubital vein at a rate of 3 mL/sec.

Ferumoxides-enhanced MR Imaging
MR imaging was performed in all patients within 10 days after triple-phase helical CT with a 1.5-T MR unit (Horizon; GE Medical Systems) and a phased-array multicoil as a receiver coil. Ferumoxides solution (Feridex IV; Advanced Magnetics, Cambridge, Mass), at a dose of 15 µmol per kilogram of body weight, was diluted with 100 mL of a 5% glucose solution and administered intravenously through an in-line 5-µm specific filter for approximately 30 minutes. MR imaging began about 30 minutes after the end of ferumoxides administration.

The MR protocol included a fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo sequence with two echo times (repetition time msec/echo times msec, 3,333–8,571/18 and 90–117; an echo train length of 10–18; two signals acquired; a 256 x 256 matrix; and bandwidth of 120 Hz per pixel), a gradient-recalled echo (GRE) acquisition in the steady state (216/20, 20° flip angle, one signal acquired, and bandwidth of 83.3 Hz per pixel), a T2*-weighted fast multiplanar GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4–9.5, 30° flip angle, and bandwidth of 60 Hz per pixel), a T2*-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled GRE sequence (130/8.4–9.5, 30° flip angle), and a breath-hold in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled GRE sequence (200/4.2, 90° flip angle, and 256 x 160 matrix).

Twenty transverse images were obtained during each pulse sequence with a section thickness of 6–8 mm and a 2-mm intersection gap. Saturation bands superior and inferior to the imaging volume were applied in all sequences to minimize motion artifact. Fat saturation was used in intermediate-weighted and T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences. During the T2*-weighted fast multiplanar GRE acquisition in the steady state and the fast multiplanar spoiled GRE sequence, multiple sections were obtained in an interleaved fashion, and the whole liver was imaged with 20 sections during two breath holds.

Resected Liver Segments
A total of 175 segments were resected in the 70 patients. However, in seven instances, two segments were completely occupied by a single HCC nodule and were considered to be a single segment. Therefore, a total of 168 segments (78 with at least one HCC nodule and 90 without HCC) were ultimately included in subsequent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Among these 168 segments, 74 contained only one HCC nodule; one, two HCC nodules; one, one HCC and three dysplastic nodules; two, one HCC and one dysplastic nodule; and three, only one dysplastic nodule. There were no other focal lesions such as cysts or hemangiomas in any resected segments.

Image Analysis
Images from all ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging sequences and triple-phase helical CT images were evaluated independently and in blinded fashion by three gastrointestinal radiologists (J.H.L., S.H.K., D.C.). The MR and CT images were reviewed in individual sessions separated by 3-week intervals. All images were evaluated at a 2,000 x 2,000 picture archiving and communication system (PACS; GE Medical Systems Integrated Imaging Solutions, Mount Prospect, Ill) monitor, with adjustment of the optimal window setting in each case. Narrow window settings had been used in all patients because the reviewer could adjust all parameters of window width and level at the PACS monitor. The image review was conducted on a segment-by-segment basis, but the entire liver was reviewed in every patient. The study coordinator (B.K.K.) assigned numbers to all hepatic segments according to the Couinaud numbering system.

Each observer recorded both the location (ie, the Couinaud segment number) and the size of each focal lesion and stated whether he or she was able to ascertain the presence or absence of HCC. On CT images, nodules showing enhancement during the hepatic arterial phase and a lack of portal venous supply (35,17) were regarded as HCC nodules. Specifically, nodules that showed homogeneous or variegated enhancement and visible intratumoral arteries on hepatic arterial phase images, isoattenuation or low attenuation on portal venous phase images, and low attenuation on delayed phase images, and nodules of mixed attenuation on hepatic arterial and portal venous phase images and low attenuation on delayed phase images were considered to be HCC nodules. In addition, nodules seen to have discrete capsules on hepatic arterial and delayed phase images (18), nodules with a mosaic appearance on portal venous and delayed phase images (18), and nodules larger than 2 cm that showed predominantly low attenuation during all three phases (4) were regarded as HCC.

On ferumoxides-enhanced MR images, any visible nodule of high signal intensity was considered to represent HCC. Each observer assigned one of the following five confidence levels to his or her observations: 1, HCC definitely absent; 2, HCC probably absent; 3, HCC possibly present; 4, HCC probably present; and 5, HCC definitely present. When a lesion invaded two or more segments, the observers were asked to evaluate only the segment that was mainly involved and to determine the probability of another lesion existing in the other segments.

Statistical Analysis
For each imaging modality, a binomial ROC curve was fitted to each observer’s confidence rating data by means of a maximum-likelihood estimation. The diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality was determined by calculating the area under each observer-specific binomial ROC curve (ie, the area under the ROC curve [Az] index). Composite ROC curves for the combined performance of all observers were obtained by applying the maximum-likelihood curve-fitting algorithm to the pooled data of the three observers for each imaging modality. The number of HCC nodules correctly classified as possibly present (a score of 3), probably present (a score of 4), or definitely present (a score of 5) by each observer was regarded as the number of correctly diagnosed HCC nodules; these criteria are currently used in clinical practice in our hospital.

Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each observer and for each imaging modality, and the statistical significance of any difference between MR and CT results was assessed by using the McNemar test. The positive and negative predictive values and false-positive rates for the depiction of HCCs were also calculated for each imaging modality. A P value < .05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Interobserver agreement for the detection of HCC with each imaging modality was assessed with {kappa} statistics. {kappa} > .80 were considered to indicate excellent agreement.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The Az values for each observer at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging and triple-phase helical CT, with pathologic findings in the resected liver specimens as the standard of diagnosis, are shown in Table 1. Two of three observers achieved a significantly greater Az with ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging than with triple-phase helical CT (P < .05). ROC curves constructed on the basis of pooled data from the three observers for each imaging modality are shown in Figure 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Az and P Values for Ferumoxides-enhanced MR Imaging and Triple-Phase Helical CT for the Detection of HCC by Three Observers

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Graph shows composite ROC curves for the data pooled from all three observers. The mean Az (an indicator of diagnostic accuracy) for detection of HCC on ferumoxides-enhanced MR images obtained with all six sequences was 0.982 ± 0.006; that for triple-phase helical CT was 0.952 ± 0.010. The difference in mean Az between the two modalities was statistically significant (P < .001).

 
Table 2 shows the mean sensitivities and specificities for each observer and for each imaging modality. The mean sensitivity of MR (95%, 222 of 234 segments) was significantly higher than that of CT (88%, 205 of 234 segments; P = .001). All HCC nodules missed at MR and CT were smaller than 3 cm, and the numbers of missed HCC nodules were greater at CT than at MR for all observers. A 1.7-cm HCC nodule was detected at MR by all observers but was detected at CT by only one observer (Fig 2). Among the HCC nodules detected on CT images, only one 1.3-cm nodule was not detected on MR images by any of the observers (Fig 3). There was one instance in which a small, well-differentiated HCC nodule was depicted on delayed phase CT images but was barely visible on MR images (Fig 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Sensitivity and Specificity for Detection of Liver Segments Containing HCC at Ferumoxides-enhanced MR Imaging and Triple-Phase Helical CT

 


View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Images of a 1.7-cm HCC nodule in segment VI of the liver of a 39-year-old man with macronodular liver cirrhosis. (a) Arterial phase, (b) portal venous phase, and (c) delayed phase hepatic CT scans show no definite mass. Only one observer assigned a score of 3 on the basis of these images. (d) Ferumoxides-enhanced, fat-suppressed, respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo MR image (5,000/18) and (e) image from a T2*-weighted fast multiplanar GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) demonstrate a hyperintense mass (arrow) in segment VI.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Images of a 1.7-cm HCC nodule in segment VI of the liver of a 39-year-old man with macronodular liver cirrhosis. (a) Arterial phase, (b) portal venous phase, and (c) delayed phase hepatic CT scans show no definite mass. Only one observer assigned a score of 3 on the basis of these images. (d) Ferumoxides-enhanced, fat-suppressed, respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo MR image (5,000/18) and (e) image from a T2*-weighted fast multiplanar GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) demonstrate a hyperintense mass (arrow) in segment VI.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. Images of a 1.7-cm HCC nodule in segment VI of the liver of a 39-year-old man with macronodular liver cirrhosis. (a) Arterial phase, (b) portal venous phase, and (c) delayed phase hepatic CT scans show no definite mass. Only one observer assigned a score of 3 on the basis of these images. (d) Ferumoxides-enhanced, fat-suppressed, respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo MR image (5,000/18) and (e) image from a T2*-weighted fast multiplanar GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) demonstrate a hyperintense mass (arrow) in segment VI.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2d. Images of a 1.7-cm HCC nodule in segment VI of the liver of a 39-year-old man with macronodular liver cirrhosis. (a) Arterial phase, (b) portal venous phase, and (c) delayed phase hepatic CT scans show no definite mass. Only one observer assigned a score of 3 on the basis of these images. (d) Ferumoxides-enhanced, fat-suppressed, respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo MR image (5,000/18) and (e) image from a T2*-weighted fast multiplanar GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) demonstrate a hyperintense mass (arrow) in segment VI.

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2e. Images of a 1.7-cm HCC nodule in segment VI of the liver of a 39-year-old man with macronodular liver cirrhosis. (a) Arterial phase, (b) portal venous phase, and (c) delayed phase hepatic CT scans show no definite mass. Only one observer assigned a score of 3 on the basis of these images. (d) Ferumoxides-enhanced, fat-suppressed, respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo MR image (5,000/18) and (e) image from a T2*-weighted fast multiplanar GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) demonstrate a hyperintense mass (arrow) in segment VI.

 


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Images of a 1.5-cm HCC nodule in segment VII of the liver of a 60-year-old man. (a) Arterial phase hepatic CT scan shows a small, ill-defined, enhancing mass (arrow). Portal venous and delayed phase images (not shown) revealed no mass; the mass was isoattenuating. (b) MR image from T2*-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) shows a mass (arrow). MR images obtained with other sequences (not shown) revealed no mass. The mass was not interpreted as HCC by any of the three observers, probably because of its inhomogeneity and the noise caused by cirrhotic regenerative nodules.

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Images of a 1.5-cm HCC nodule in segment VII of the liver of a 60-year-old man. (a) Arterial phase hepatic CT scan shows a small, ill-defined, enhancing mass (arrow). Portal venous and delayed phase images (not shown) revealed no mass; the mass was isoattenuating. (b) MR image from T2*-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) shows a mass (arrow). MR images obtained with other sequences (not shown) revealed no mass. The mass was not interpreted as HCC by any of the three observers, probably because of its inhomogeneity and the noise caused by cirrhotic regenerative nodules.

 


View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. Images of a 1.7-cm, well-differentiated HCC nodule in segment VII of the liver of a 55-year-old man. (a) Arterial phase and (b) portal venous phase hepatic CT scans do not depict a mass. (c) Delayed phase hepatic CT scan shows a well-defined hypoattenuating mass (arrow). This segment was given a confidence-scale score of 1, 3, and 3 by the three observers on the basis of CT findings. (d) MR image from T2*-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) shows a barely visible, ill-defined, slightly hyperintense mass (arrow). The lesion was not depicted on MR images obtained with other sequences (not shown). This segment was given a confidence-scale score of 1 by each of the three observers on the basis of MR findings.

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. Images of a 1.7-cm, well-differentiated HCC nodule in segment VII of the liver of a 55-year-old man. (a) Arterial phase and (b) portal venous phase hepatic CT scans do not depict a mass. (c) Delayed phase hepatic CT scan shows a well-defined hypoattenuating mass (arrow). This segment was given a confidence-scale score of 1, 3, and 3 by the three observers on the basis of CT findings. (d) MR image from T2*-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) shows a barely visible, ill-defined, slightly hyperintense mass (arrow). The lesion was not depicted on MR images obtained with other sequences (not shown). This segment was given a confidence-scale score of 1 by each of the three observers on the basis of MR findings.

 


View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4c. Images of a 1.7-cm, well-differentiated HCC nodule in segment VII of the liver of a 55-year-old man. (a) Arterial phase and (b) portal venous phase hepatic CT scans do not depict a mass. (c) Delayed phase hepatic CT scan shows a well-defined hypoattenuating mass (arrow). This segment was given a confidence-scale score of 1, 3, and 3 by the three observers on the basis of CT findings. (d) MR image from T2*-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) shows a barely visible, ill-defined, slightly hyperintense mass (arrow). The lesion was not depicted on MR images obtained with other sequences (not shown). This segment was given a confidence-scale score of 1 by each of the three observers on the basis of MR findings.

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4d. Images of a 1.7-cm, well-differentiated HCC nodule in segment VII of the liver of a 55-year-old man. (a) Arterial phase and (b) portal venous phase hepatic CT scans do not depict a mass. (c) Delayed phase hepatic CT scan shows a well-defined hypoattenuating mass (arrow). This segment was given a confidence-scale score of 1, 3, and 3 by the three observers on the basis of CT findings. (d) MR image from T2*-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled GRE acquisition in the steady state (130/8.4, 30° flip angle) shows a barely visible, ill-defined, slightly hyperintense mass (arrow). The lesion was not depicted on MR images obtained with other sequences (not shown). This segment was given a confidence-scale score of 1 by each of the three observers on the basis of MR findings.

 
The mean specificities for each observer and each imaging modality are also shown in Table 2. The mean specificities of MR and CT were 97% (261 of 270 segments) and 98% (264 of 270 segments), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .754). There were nine false-positive MR imaging results and six false-positive CT results among the three observers. Eight false-positive MR imaging results were primarily attributed to the presence of overlying vascular structures (portal veins or hepatic veins) in the images, and the remaining false-positive result was attributed to the fact that one dysplastic nodule appeared slightly hyperintense. (The other seven dysplastic nodules were isointense and thus not detected on MR images.)

Four of the six false-positive CT results were attributed to the fact that two of eight dysplastic nodules were slightly hypoattenuating at triple-phase helical CT (one was hypoattenuating on images from all three phases, and the other was isoattenuating on arterial phase images and hypoattenuating on portal and delayed phase images), while the remaining six dysplastic nodules were isoattenuating. The other two false-positive CT results were due to the likely presence of arterioportal shunts.

Overall, 222 true-positive findings and nine false-positive findings were recorded at MR, with a resulting false-positive rate of 3% (nine of 270 segments), and 205 true-positive findings and six false-positive findings were recorded at CT, with a resulting false-positive rate of 2% (six of 270 segments). MR findings had a positive predictive value of 96% (222 of 231 segments) and CT findings 97% (205 of 211 segments); MR findings had a negative predictive value of 97% (261 of 273 segments) and CT findings 92% (270 of 293 segments).

The {kappa} values among the three observers showed excellent agreement at both imaging modalities (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Agreement among Observers Regarding the Presence of HCC

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dynamic helical CT imaging with hepatic arterial and portal venous phases has improved the ability of CT to depict hepatic tumors (15). Within the past decade, some investigators have advocated the use of delayed phase imaging for its potential to add value in dynamic helical CT imaging of the liver (1,4,5). The degree of contrast between tumor and liver has been reported to be higher in the delayed phase than in the portal venous phase, resulting in an improved rate of detection of well-differentiated hypovascular HCC (19,20). Jang et al (4) and Hwang et al (5) reported that some HCC nodules were missed when only arterial and portal venous phase scans were obtained. Delayed phase images may reveal these nodules as low-attenuating lesions. Furthermore, delayed phase imaging has additional value in the characterization of a hepatic mass because it confers better visualization of the capsule and the mosaic pattern seen in some HCC nodules. In our study, one of 11 HCCs smaller than 2 cm could not be detected on arterial or portal phase images but was hypoattenuating on the delayed phase image. Another HCC nodule measuring 1.5 cm was barely visible on arterial and portal venous phase images but was clearly visible on the delayed phase image.

Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging has been evaluated in comparison with other imaging modalities, such as abdominal US, contrast material–enhanced CT, CT during arterial portography, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, and unenhanced MR imaging (6,8,10,11,1416,21,22). In all but one (10) of these studies, ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging appeared to be superior to other imaging modalities for the depiction of hepatic tumors. However, most of these studies had limitations, including a lack of histopathologic confirmation and heterogeneity in the histologic types of hepatic tumors. In our study, the only patients included were those who were confirmed to have HCC at histopathologic evaluation after hepatic resection.

With pathologic findings in the resected liver specimens as the standard of reference, the results of our study revealed that ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging was superior to triple-phase helical CT for depiction of HCC. The mean sensitivity of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging (95%, 222 of 234 segments) was significantly higher than that of triple-phase helical CT (88%, 205 of 234 segments; P = .001). The specificities of MR and CT were 97% and 98%, respectively, and the difference between them was not significant. Bluemke et al (16) reported that the specificity of dual-phase helical CT was superior to that of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging in the detection of hepatic lesions. However, in the study of Bluemke et al (10), all selected patients had hepatic metastases, not HCC nodules.

Our study did not use explanted liver as the ultimate diagnostic standard (we instead relied on findings in the resected specimens for pathologic proof), and this factor probably led to higher sensitivities. Peterson et al (23) used pathologic findings in 430 explanted livers as the diagnostic standard and reported that triphasic CT (CT with precontrast, hepatic arterial, and portal venous phases) depicted HCC in 26 (59%) of 44 patients prospectively and 30 (68%) of 44 patients retrospectively. On the basis of findings in explanted livers, Lim et al (24) found that triphasic helical CT (CT with hepatic arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phases) had a per-patient sensitivity for depiction of HCC of 80% (ie, CT depicted HCC in 12 of 15 affected patients) and a detection sensitivity of 71% (ie, CT depicted 15 of 21 HCC nodules). After another study in which findings in explanted liver were used as the diagnostic standard, Krinsky et al (25) reported that dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images depicted 11 of 20 hepatic tumors in 71 patients after transplantation, for a sensitivity of 55% (11 of 20 tumors) and a specificity of 86% (60 of 70 patients).

Although pathologic findings in explanted liver constitute the best standard of reference, the group of patients evaluated in the study of Krinsky et al (25) who had undergone transplantation represented patients with late-stage or end-stage cirrhosis; therefore, they do not represent the typical group of patients encountered in day-to-day clinical practice. In advanced and late stages of liver cirrhosis, the detectability of HCC is relatively low because of extensive fibrosis and distortion of liver parenchyma (2325).

In contrast to the results of the studies described above, Tang et al (10), after a prospective study of 53 patients with cirrhosis, reported that the overall sensitivity of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging was 94% (97 of 103 lesions) and that of ferumoxides-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging was 78% (80 of 103 lesions). After another more recent study that incorporated a segment-by-segment analysis, Matsuo et al (26) reported results of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging that were not as good as our results: The sensitivity in that study was 62% (150 of 234 segments), and the Az value was 0.807. However, the studies of Tang et al (10) and Matsuo et al (26) included cases without histologically proved malignancy, and the majority of their patients had severe cirrhosis (38 of 53 patients) (10) or a degree of cirrhosis that was not described (26). It is well known that the effectiveness of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging is limited in patients with severe cirrhosis (10,27).

We assessed the accuracy of CT and MR imaging in the depiction of HCC in patients whose liver function was relatively good, enabling them to sustain surgery, rather than in patients with end-stage cirrhosis. Therefore, the results of our study are probably better than the results that will be achieved in clinical practice, in which patients with advanced cirrhosis are often encountered. This inherent weakness could not be avoided with our study policy of confirmation of presence or absence of HCC by means of pathologic proof. Without sampling the entire liver, the true sensitivity and specificity of findings at any given imaging modality remain unknown.

If we were to have included liver segments without tumors at the time of observation, assessed the presence of HCC during a long period of interval follow-up of the remaining liver segments, and used findings at follow-up as a reference, we could have excluded patient selection bias. However, this procedure would not have represented a valid standard of reference, because not all small HCCs will be depicted at imaging examinations. Furthermore, new HCC nodules can develop in patients with liver cirrhosis after a certain time. Therefore, with current methods, it is impossible to determine the true sensitivity and specificity of an imaging modality for the general patient population seen in day-to-day clinical practice. For the evaluation of the accuracy of a test for the detection of HCC, patients having relatively good liver function—for example, candidates for hepatic resection surgery—should be grouped differently from patients with late-stage cirrhosis—for example, candidates for transplantation. In fact, the detectability of HCC in patients who have undergone hepatic resection surgery is not as low as it is in patients who have undergone liver transplantation.

There is special concern regarding the use of ferumoxides in patients with severe cirrhosis. Scarring, regeneration, inflammation, and shunting in cirrhotic livers can reduce the hepatic uptake of ferumoxides and result in signal intensity heterogeneity in the liver (Fig 3), thereby limiting the effectiveness of postcontrast images in the depiction of HCC in cirrhotic livers (10,27). Furthermore, diversion of portal venous blood to the spleen in portal hypertension decreases blood flow to the liver; this may decrease the amount of ferumoxides arriving in the liver. Yamashita et al (28) suggested that ferumoxides perform well in all cases of chronic liver disease except in the most severe cases of cirrhosis. Yamamoto et al (29) reported better detection of HCC in cirrhotic livers with ferumoxides than with unenhanced MR imaging.

The dose of ferumoxides may be a factor in the detectability of hepatic lesions in patients with liver cirrhosis. Tang et al (10) and Matsuo et al (26) each administered 10 µmol/kg of ferumoxides and achieved sensitivity values of 78% (80 of 103 lesions) and 62% (150 of 234 segments), respectively. We administered ferumoxides at a dose of 15 µmol/kg, and the results were much better. It may be postulated that the increased amount of iron in circulation may increase the iron uptake by Kupffer cells in diseased liver. Scott et al (30) reported that administration of high doses (15 µmol/kg) and low doses (7.5 µmol/kg) of ferumoxides to patients with colorectal cancer during evaluation for hepatic metastasis did not affect the lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio; however, the patients in this study did not have cirrhosis.

In the present study, 45 (64%) of 70 patients had mild cirrhosis, 10 (14%) had chronic hepatitis, all patients underwent MR imaging with no undesirable side effects, and all the images obtained were satisfactory. Therefore, the increased total amount of ferumoxides might have had a positive effect in our study, yielding an increased rate of depiction of HCC nodules in patients with mild cirrhosis. Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging is limited by the fact that it is difficult to detect and differentiate well-differentiated HCC and dysplastic nodules with this modality (31,32). In our study, there was one case of well-differentiated HCC that was detected at triphasic helical CT but barely detected at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging (Fig 4).

This study had several limitations. First, unenhanced MR images were not additionally obtained in this study because of the long time required for biphasic (ie, unenhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced) MR imaging. Unenhanced MR imaging is known to be necessary to decrease the number of false-positive findings attributed to the presence of small vessels. However, the results of this study included only a few false-positive findings. Second, because the selection of candidates for surgical resection was influenced by findings at triple-phase helical CT and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging, which themselves were being investigated for their efficiency in the depiction of HCC, strong positive bias was present.

Third, we used a relatively slow rate (3 mL/sec) for contrast material injection during CT examination; a faster injection rate (4–5 mL/sec) is used at many institutions. However, the body weight of our patients is typically lower than that of Western patients, so the injection rate of 3 mL/sec was reasonably rapid for our patients. We used a 7-mm section thickness at CT, which is fairly thick by today’s standards. Detectability of HCC with helical CT may be improved by using multi–detector row CT with thin collimation because of the improved spatial and temporal resolution of this technique. Another limitation of our study was that the observers were aware that all of the patients were found to have HCC at histopathologic examination after hepatic resection surgery.

In summary, the results of our study show that ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging is superior to triple-phase helical CT for depicting HCC, and we therefore recommend the use of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging in the preoperative staging work-up of candidates for surgical resection of HCC.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Seonwoo Kim, PhD, for statistical analysis, Bonnie Hami of the University Hospitals of Cleveland, Ohio, for editorial assistance, and Young Joo Moon for assistance in manuscript preparation.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: Az = area under ROC curve, GRE = gradient-recalled echo, HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma, ROC = receiver operating characteristic

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, B.K.K., J.H.L., D.C.; study concepts, J.H.L., D.C.; study design, J.H.L.; literature research, B.K.K., J.H.L., D.C.; clinical studies, J.H.L., S.H.K., D.C., H.K.L., W.J.L., S.J.L; data acquisition, B.K.K., D.C.; data analysis/interpretation, B.K.K., D.C., J.H.L.; statistical analysis, B.K.K., D.C.; manuscript preparation, B.K.K., D.C., J.H.L.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, J.H.L.; manuscript editing and revision/review, D.C., J.H.L.; manuscript final version approval, all authors.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Van Leeuwen MS, Noordzij J, Feldberg MA, Hennipman AH, Doornewaard H. Focal liver lesions: characterization with triphasic spiral CT. Radiology 1996; 201:327-336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB, Jr, Nino-Murcia M, Jorgensen MJ, Harris DP. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of early hepatic arterial phase scans in the detection of small (<1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:879-884.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Baron RL, Oliver JH, III, Dodd GD, III, Nalesnik M, Holbert BL, Carr B. Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT. Radiology 1996; 199:505-511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Jang HJ, Lim JH, Lee SJ, Park CK, Park HS, Do YS. Hepatocellular carcinoma: are combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography in addition to triple-phase helical CT all necessary for preoperative evaluation? Radiology 2000; 215:373-380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hwang GJ, Kim MJ, Yoo HS, Lee JT. Nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with arterial-, portal-, and delayed-phase images at spiral CT. Radiology 1997; 202:383-388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Choi D, Kim SH, Lim JH, et al. Preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus combined helical CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:475-482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ros PR, Freeny PC, Harms SE, et al. Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: a multicenter clinical trial of the safety and efficacy in the detection of focal hepatic lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:481-488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Seneterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT and during arterial portography. Radiology 1996; 200:785-792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Saini S, Stark DD, Hahn PF, et al. Ferrite particles: a superparamagnetic MR contrast agent for enhanced detection of liver carcinoma. Radiology 1987; 162:217-222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Arakawa A, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma arising in cirrhotic livers: comparison of gadolinium- and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:1547-1554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Vogl TJ, Hammerstingl R, Schwarz W, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide–enhanced versus gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging for differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Radiology 1996; 198:881-887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Tanaka M, Nakashima O, Wada Y, Kage M, Kojiro M. Pathomorphological study of Kupffer cells in hepatocellular carcinoma and hyperplastic nodule lesions in the liver. Hepatology 1996; 24:807-812.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Yamamoto H, Yamashita Y, Yoshimatsu S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: detection with unenhanced and iron oxide–enhanced MR. Radiology 1995; 195:106-112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ward J, Naik KS, Guthrie JA, et al. Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 1999; 210:459-466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Muller RD, Vogel K, Neumann K, et al. SPIO-MR imaging versus double-phase spiral CT in detecting malignant lesions of the liver. Acta Radiol 1999; 40:628-635.[Medline]
  16. Bluemke DA, Paulson EK, Choti MA, et al. Detection of hepatic lesions in candidates for surgery: comparison of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1653-1658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nino-Murcia M, Olcott EW, Jeffrey PB, Jr, Lamm RL, Beaulieu CF, Jain KA. Focal liver lesions: pattern-based classification scheme for enhancement at arterial phase CT. Radiology 2000; 215:746-751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lalonde L, van Beers B, Jamart J, et al. Capsular and mosaic pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between CT and MR imaging. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; 17:241-244.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Mitsuzaki K, Yamashita Y, Ogata I, et al. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:753-757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Takayasu K, Furukawa H, Wakao F, et al. CT diagnosis of early hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity, findings, and CT-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:885-890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hagspiel KD, Neidl KF, Eichenberger AC, Weder W, Marincek B. Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide–enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US. Radiology 1995; 196:471-478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Denys A, Arrivé L, Servois V, et al. Hepatic tumors: detection and characterization at 1-T MR imaging enhanced with AMI-25. Radiology 1994; 193:663-669.
  23. Peterson MS, Baron RL, Marsh JW, Jr, Oliver JH, III, Confer SR, Hunt LE. Pretransplantation surveillance for possible hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: epidemiology and CT-based tumor detection rate in 430 cases with surgical pathologic correlation. Radiology 2000; 217:743-749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lim JH, Kim CK, Lee WJ, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic livers: accuracy of helical CT in transplant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:693-698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Krinsky GA, Lee VS, Theise ND, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules in patients with cirrhosis: prospective diagnosis with MR imaging and explantation correlation. Radiology 2001; 219:445-454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Matsuo M, Kanematsu M, Itoh K, et al. Detection of malignant hepatic tumors: comparison of gadolinium- and ferumoxide-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:637-643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Elizondo G, Weissleder R, Stark DD, et al. Hepatic cirrhosis and hepatitis: MR imaging enhanced with superparamagnetic iron oxide. Radiology 1990; 174:797-801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yamashita Y, Yamamoto H, Hirai A, et al. MR imaging enhancement with superparamagnetic iron oxide in chronic liver disease: influence of liver dysfunction and parenchymal pathology. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21:318-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Yamamoto H, Yamashita Y, Yoshimatsu S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: detection with unenhanced and iron oxide–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 195:106-112.
  30. Scott J, Ward J, Kuthrie JA, Wilson D, Robinson PJ. MRI of liver: a comparison using high dose and low dose ferumoxides infusion in patients with colorectal liver metastasis. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18:297-303.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Imai Y, Murakami T, Yoshida S, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histologic grading. Hepatology 2000; 32:205-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Lim JH, Choi D, Cho SK, et al. Conspicuity of hepatocellular nodular lesions in cirrhotic livers at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging; importance of Kupffer cell number. Radiology 2001; 220:669-676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. J. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. K. Han, K. H. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and B. I. Choi
Peripheral Mass Forming Cholangiocarcinoma in Cirrhotic Liver
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1428 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. K. Kim, H. S. Kwak, C. S. Kim, G. H. Chung, Y. M. Han, and J. M. Lee
Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: Comparison of SPIO-enhanced MR Imaging and 16-Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2381042193.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. M. Lutz, J. K. Willmann, K. Goepfert, B. Marincek, and D. Weishaupt
Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: Enhancement Patterns at Dynamic Gadolinium- and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 520 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Kim, D. Choi, S. H. Kim, J. H. Lim, W. J. Lee, M. J. Kim, H. K. Lim, and S. J. Lee
Ferucarbotran-Enhanced MRI Versus Triple-Phase MDCT for the Preoperative Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1069 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kang, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE