Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2281011651
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dyke, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ballon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dyke, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ballon, D.
(Radiology 2003;228:271-278.)
© RSNA, 2003


Technical Developments

Osteogenic and Ewing Sarcomas: Estimation of Necrotic Fraction during Induction Chemotherapy with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging1

Jonathan P. Dyke, PhD, David M. Panicek, MD, John H. Healey, MD, Paul A. Meyers, MD, Andrew G. Huvos, MD, Lawrence H. Schwartz, MD, Howard T. Thaler, PhD, Paul S. Tofts, DPhil, Richard Gorlick, MD, Jason A. Koutcher, MD, PhD and Douglas Ballon, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology (J.P.D., D.M.P, L.H.S., D.B.), Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Ave, Box 234, New York, NY 10021-4885; Departments of Radiology (D.M.P., L.H.S., J.A.K., D.B.), Surgery (J.H.H.), Pediatrics (P.A.M., R.G.), Pathology (A.G.H.), Biostatistics (H.T.T.), Medical Physics (J.A.K., D.B.), and Medicine (J.A.K.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Institute of Neurology, University College London, England (P.S.T.). Received October 9, 2001; revision requested January 2, 2002; final revision received October 16; accepted November 6. Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants R01HL50139, CA05826-038A1, and RO1CA62556. Address correspondence to J.P.D. (e-mail: jpd2001@med.cornell.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Dynamic contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images of primary osteogenic sarcoma (n = 19) and Ewing sarcoma (n = 10) were reviewed in 29 patients undergoing induction chemotherapy before surgery. Histogram distributions containing the initial slope and pharmacokinetic model parameters from individual voxels within each tumor were fitted for each patient. The histogram analysis of initial slope from the tumor correlated well with percentage necrosis as determined at pathologic examination (r = 0.60, P < .001), as did a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model (r = 0.64, P < .001). Both methods predicted tumors with clinically important degrees of necrosis (ie, ≥90%) in a large majority of cases. The ability to determine response to induction chemotherapy by means of noninvasive monitoring of necrotic fraction with perfusion MR imaging methods may provide useful prognostic information and help surgical planning.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Bone neoplasms, MR, 41.12143, 44.12143, 45.12143 • Chemotherapy, 41.3221, 41.3281, 44.3221, 44.3281, 45.3221, 45.3281 • Ewing sarcoma, 41.3281, 44.3281, 45.3281 • Osteosarcoma, 41.3221, 44.3221, 45.3221


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Induction and adjuvant chemotherapy in musculoskeletal tumors such as osteogenic sarcomas has improved long-term survival from 20% to 70% compared with surgery alone (1). The degree of necrosis in osteogenic and Ewing sarcomas after a course of induction chemotherapy before surgery is prognostic for event-free survival (2). The Huvos grading system determines percentage necrosis from a single longitudinal 5-µm tumor slice obtained at definitive surgery (2,3). A grade III or grade IV response (ie, ≥90% necrotic) is a predictor of an improved probability of event-free survival (3). Thus, a quantitative noninvasive estimate of tumor necrosis during various stages of chemotherapy may yield prognostic information that is useful for subsequent patient treatment. In addition, a method that assesses the degree of necrosis throughout the entire heterogeneous tumor may add to information gained previously with single-slice pathologic examination.

The ability of static clinical magnetic resonance (MR) images to depict tumor necrotic fraction during induction chemotherapy is limited by several factors. T1-weighted MR images alone cannot differentiate viable tumor from nonviable tissue or edema. T2-weighted MR images cannot adequately distinguish tumor from necrosis, and lesion boundaries are frequently overestimated because of the presence of edema and hemorrhage (4,5). It was determined that static T2-weighted MR images were an indicator of response following chemotherapy with an accuracy of 71% but a specificity of only 45.5% (6). Static T1-weighted contrast material–enhanced images can differentiate necrosis and hemorrhage from tumor but have difficulty separating tumor from chemotherapy-induced inflammation (7). Dynamic enhanced MR imaging has been shown to assist in detecting viable tumor in osteogenic sarcomas being treated with chemotherapy (810). Regions of necrosis, muscle, vessel, and viable tumor display distinct time-intensity curves in dynamic images. The rapid acquisition sequences used in these dynamic studies provide more information on vascular uptake than do static gadolinium–enhanced subtraction studies.

Advances in chemotherapy and surgical techniques currently allow 90% of adolescents with localized osteogenic sarcoma of the extremity to be treated with limb-salvage surgery instead of limb ablation (11). The relationship of a sarcoma to the joint, growth plate, and major neurovascular structures determines what tissue must be excised and what can be preserved. This influences the success of limb-salvage tumor surgery. Surgical margins are typically narrowest in these critical areas. Narrow margins, particularly in difficult tumor locations, such as the popliteal space, and insufficient tumor necrosis in response to chemotherapy contribute to the development of local recurrence (1215). For example, a combination of good necrosis and wide surgical margins was associated with only one recurrence in 93 patients. In contrast, patients who had a poor necrosis response developed a local recurrence in four of 14 cases despite wide surgical margins (15). These data suggest that it may be important to tailor surgery on the basis of obtainable margins and the local response to chemotherapy. To avoid raising the risk of local tumor recurrence, clinicians need an accurate preoperative assessment of these factors. At present, the response of the tumor to chemotherapy is not reliably identified until after surgery. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to estimate tumor necrosis present in osteogenic and Ewing sarcomas being treated with induction chemotherapy before surgery by means of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
From November 1998 to May 2001, 50 patients with osteogenic or Ewing sarcomas underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. The referring clinicians in the bone sarcoma disease management team at Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center attempt to refer all patients for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and rarely during such treatment if clinical events are atypical. They request these studies for clinical care, as they believe (on the basis of slightly different implementations of this technique by others) that it provides incremental information that contributes to their overall treatment planning decisions. Various logistic problems prevented all patients from undergoing imaging.

To obtain the most accurate correlation with pathologically determined necrotic fraction, only patients who did not receive chemotherapy between the MR imaging examination and subsequent surgery were included. The resulting 29 patients (10 female and 19 male patients; age range, 6–35 years; mean age, 16 years ± 1 [standard error]) had osteogenic (n = 19) or Ewing (n = 10) sarcomas located in the distal femur or proximal tibia (n = 23), pelvis (n = 3), humerus (n = 2), and shoulder (n = 1).

Patient diagnosis was confirmed initially with a bone or soft-tissue biopsy. Patients with osteogenic sarcoma were treated with 8 weeks of high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin (2). Patients with Ewing sarcoma were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine. MR images were obtained in addition to thallium 201 and technetium 99m nuclear scans, chest CT scans, and radiographs of the tumor before en bloc resection of the entire tumor mass. Consolidation chemotherapy was given for 21 weeks after surgery. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered independent of the pathologically determined Huvos grade.

Chemotherapeutic protocols included written informed consent from all patients or their guardians and were approved by the institutional review board. Moreover, the board reviewed our manuscript and noted that our study would have been considered exempt research, if reviewed initially, and that patient informed consent was not required for this retrospective review.

MR Imaging
MR imaging examinations were performed with a 1.5-T MR system (Signa Horizon or LX; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). Patients underwent imaging before definitive surgery (15 days ± 2), at which time the tumor was resected for clinical reasons and the necrotic fraction was determined pathologically. A typical staging study was performed, including T1-weighted MR imaging (repetition time msec/echo time msec of 400/17) and fat-saturated T2-weighted MR imaging (4,000/85) in the transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes. The sagittal plane was prescribed for the dynamic enhanced portion of the study to view the feeding vessel all in one section. Initially, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ) was administered manually into a peripheral arm vein, at a concentration of 0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight, resulting in a standard dose of 1 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine per 10 kg of patient weight. A 20-mL saline flush was administered at the same flow rate immediately after the gadopentetate dimeglumine bolus to flush the contrast material from the peripheral vein into the central venous system, resulting in faster and more uniform timing of the delivery of the contrast material bolus to the central venous system and subsequently to the arterial system (16). A power injector delivery system (Medrad, Indianola, Pa) was used subsequently to provide fixed flow rates. Patients with a central venous silicone catheter required a slower flow rate (0.8–1.0 mL/sec) to prevent damage to the catheter; in all other patients, contrast material was administered at a flow rate of 2 mL/sec. All patients received contrast material while they were at the imaging position in the bore of the magnet.

Dynamic perfusion MR images were acquired with a fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo sequence. The entire tumor was imaged contiguously with 10–12-mm-thick sections, yielding from five to nine sections (depending on tumor extent). Acquisition parameters included 9/2, 30° flip angle, 15.63-kHz receive bandwidth, 20–24-cm field of view, and 256 x 128 matrix (yielding a voxel resolution of 12–20 mm3). These parameters provided a temporal resolution between 4.75 and 9.45 seconds per image and approximately five points on the initial slope of the blood pool time-intensity curve. This temporal resolution was sufficient to observe the initial uptake of gadopentetate dimeglumine into the region (17,18). Data were acquired at a total of 20–40 time points in imaging times of less than 5 minutes. In all cases, a central section was placed parallel to and directly over the long axis of the bone. A preliminary imaging sequence performed at five time points ensured adequate signal-to-noise ratio and exact section positioning before administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Pathologic Examination
The gross specimen was oriented in the coronal direction, and a radiograph was obtained to determine the section that demonstrated extension of the tumor into soft tissue. As part of the standard examination of these tumors, much of the soft tissue was removed, and a 5-µm-thick slice parallel to the first cut was removed for complete pathologic analysis. Approximately 20–60 tissue slides were taken from the single slice for determination of the necrotic fraction. The response grading of the tumor, as outlined in the Table, was performed or supervised by one pathologist (A.G.H.), with more than 30 years of experience, and used to estimate the amount of necrosis induced by chemotherapy. A clinically good response is considered to be at least 90% necrosis (ie, grade III or IV) (3). It should be noted that the occurrence of spontaneous necrosis within osteogenic sarcomas has been studied and rarely accounts for more than 25% of the total necrotic fraction (19); thus, any finding of substantially greater necrotic fraction in patients undergoing chemotherapy may be attributed to the effects of the therapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Huvos Tumor Necrosis Grading System

 
Data Analysis
After online reconstruction, data were exported to a workstation (Ultra 10, Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, Calif; or Optiplex GX400, 1.4-GHz Pentium 4 system, Dell, Austin, Tex) for analysis. Software to display and analyze the data was written with interactive data language (IDL, version 5.5; Research Systems, Boulder, Colo). Before analysis, the dynamically acquired sagittal sections were reformatted to yield a coronal section with the approximate orientation as that used for pathologic examination. Time-intensity curves were analyzed for each voxel in the coronal section. The initial uptake slope was used for characterization of the response to the contrast material bolus. The initial slope was calculated with five-point sliding linear regression applied to the first 2 minutes of the time-intensity curve (7). A baseline signal intensity (SI) value, SIpre, was calculated as the mean intensity of three points before injection. The percentage increase per minute for each voxel was then calculated according to the following equation:

Analysis was performed for each voxel within a region of interest corresponding to the reconstructed coronal section placed over the central axis of the bone to compare with the pathology specimen. The region-of-interest boundary was defined primarily by one investigator (J.P.D.), but radiologists (D.M.P., L.H.S.) were consulted for clarification of the boundaries in some of the 29 studies if the margins of the mass were unclear; in those few cases, the tumor had largely resolved after therapy. In the majority of cases, boundaries of remaining tumor mass were evident. Regions of interest were selected to encompass as large a region as possible while avoiding partial volume effects and any substantial artifact; their size ranged from 2.2 to 91.3 cm2 for the 29 patients. A histogram containing the slope value for each voxel in the region of interest was created for the entire tumor, as well as for a single coronal section, with a bin value of 5% uptake per minute. All histograms were normalized to the number of voxels contained within each region of interest to account for variability in the size of tumor burden between patients.

A second method of analysis, a pharmacokinetic model, was also studied. The two-compartment model proposed by Hoffman et al (20), based on that of Brix et al (21), incorporates rate constants of gadopentetate dimeglumine transfer between the lesion and plasma compartments (kep) and elimination by the plasma (kel) (22). Assumptions in this model are that a monoexponential function describes the plasma concentration up to 20 minutes after injection; direct measurement of the plasma curve is not needed, as the clearance rate (kel) is estimated directly from the measured tissue curve (22). After a bolus injection of length {tau}, and assuming kep{tau} << 1 and kel{tau} << 1, the Hoffman initial equation reduces to Equation (2) (22). Additionally, assumptions about the in vivo tissue relaxivities and longitudinal relaxation times are not made but are contained in the fitted parameter (A) as shown in Equation (2). The model contains three fitted parameters: A (amplitude), kep (per minute), and kel (per minute):

At short time intervals after injection, the right side of Equation (2) is approximated by (1 + Akept); thus, the initial slope becomes proportional to Akep (18,22). This product was determined for each voxel in the region of interest and placed in a histogram.

The asymmetric continuous distribution described by Equation (3) is known as the extreme value (or Gumbel distribution) and was fitted to the histograms of both initial slope and compartmental model parameters (23).

The variable x represents the ordinate of the histogram containing bin values of percentage uptake per minute, or Akep. The variable y represents the abscissa of the histogram containing the fraction of voxels at each bin value. The amplitude ({alpha}), width ({sigma}), and median (µ) of the distribution were determined from the fitting procedure. The amplitude described the percentage of voxels within the tumor having the median value of initial slope or Akep, respectively. The width of the distribution was an indicator of the heterogeneity of the specific tumor. Tumors that were composed of a more uniform distribution of values presented a narrow width. The median value of the distribution characterized the value having the single highest concentration of voxels. Histograms were normalized to the total number of tumor voxels to allow direct comparison between patients. One justification for choosing this function was the heterogeneity of uptake present within the tumors. All tumors produced an asymmetric histogram with a tail caused by a component of greater uptake.

All data were fit to the corresponding model or histogram equations by using software developed in house with the interactive data language. A gradient-expansion algorithm within the language computes a nonlinear least-squares fit to a user-supplied function with an arbitrary number of parameters. Partial derivatives are calculated analytically and used in the fitting process to determine successive iterations until the {chi}2 value changes by a specified amount or until a maximum number of iterations have been performed.

The reproducibility and robustness of the compartmental model were examined to ensure that variations in the model parameters could be attributed to changes in the time-intensity curve and not to variations in signal-to-noise ratio levels. Randomly distributed noise was added to the time-intensity curves at 5% intervals up to 30%, which is expected to be the maximum observed in clinical images for this gradient-echo sequence. A set of compartmental fits (n = 100) were performed for each noise level for the Akep product.

Each patient was assigned a single MR imaging parameter of uptake slope and compartmental model (Akep) on the basis of the histogram analysis of all tumor voxels. These parameters were always compared with the pathologically determined necrotic fraction. Patients were placed into two groups: responders (≥90% necrosis) and nonresponders (<90% necrosis). The MR imaging methods of slope and compartmental model were analyzed independently with receiver operating characteristic curves to determine a cutoff for the MR imaging parameter that would correlate with the groups determined on the basis of necrotic fraction.

Statistical Methods
The overall degree of relationship between each parameter and percentage necrosis, as determined at pathologic examination, was assessed by means of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient, R. The criterion for statistical significance was a two-sided test at a P value of less than .05. Correlations were also compared for each tumor type separately. Receiver operating characteristic curves were computed to display the sensitivity and specificity of a parameter in predicting response over their full range of possible cutoff values. The standard of reference for receiver operating characteristic analyses was the histologic necrosis determination. Receiver operating characteristic curves were computed to display the sensitivity and specificity of the MR imaging necrosis parameter in predicting response over the full range of possible cutoff values. The cutoff values were automatically calculated with a software program (SAS; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) routine written by one of the authors (H.T.T.). The area under each receiver operating characteristic curve of the slope and compartmental model methods was calculated. The cutoff values were then calculated to achieve the maximum percentage accuracy, as well as to maximize the lesser of sensitivity and specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were reported for optimal cutoff values of the receiver operating characteristic curves for both the initial slope and model analysis parameters.


    Results
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Characteristic time-intensity or uptake curves are shown in Figure 1 for muscle, vessel, necrotic tissue, and tumor tissue. Each voxel in the image contained one time-intensity curve characteristic of the sum of tissues contained within the voxel. Each curve was then fitted with linear regression to determine the initial slope, as well as with a two-compartment model. Compartmental fits to patients exhibiting grades II and IV histologic responses to chemotherapy, respectively, are shown in Figure 2. The 50% necrotic tumor exhibited greater values of both A and kep than those of the 100% necrotic tumor, indicating a greater rate of uptake. Results of increasing the simulated noise levels in the fitting process determined that the average Akep value deviated less than 10% up to the addition of 30% noise. Parametric images of the initial slope and the compartmental model parameter (Akep) are shown in Figure 3 and compared with the T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR image.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. (a) Sagittal fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo MR image (9/2, 256 x 256 matrix, 24-cm field of view, 12-mm section thickness) obtained 4 minutes after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in a patient with osteosarcoma, 30% response (grade 1). Regions of interest are placed on regions of muscle (1), vessel (2), necrotic tumor (3), and tumor (4). (b) Representative time-intensity curves from various regions exhibit differences in initial slope time and maximum enhancement. Typical muscular uptake (1) shows a gradual increase in intensity without a noticeable plateau during this imaging period. The popliteal artery (2) has four to five time points characterizing the initial arrival of contrast material into the vessel. Necrotic tumor (3) is characterized by a lesser degree of enhancement than that of muscle. Viable tumor (4) shows an enhancement and slope greater that of muscle but less than that of vessel. At pathologic examination, the patient was confirmed to be a grade I responder to chemotherapy, exhibiting 30% necrosis at single-slice pathologic examination.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. (a) Sagittal fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo MR image (9/2, 256 x 256 matrix, 24-cm field of view, 12-mm section thickness) obtained 4 minutes after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in a patient with osteosarcoma, 30% response (grade 1). Regions of interest are placed on regions of muscle (1), vessel (2), necrotic tumor (3), and tumor (4). (b) Representative time-intensity curves from various regions exhibit differences in initial slope time and maximum enhancement. Typical muscular uptake (1) shows a gradual increase in intensity without a noticeable plateau during this imaging period. The popliteal artery (2) has four to five time points characterizing the initial arrival of contrast material into the vessel. Necrotic tumor (3) is characterized by a lesser degree of enhancement than that of muscle. Viable tumor (4) shows an enhancement and slope greater that of muscle but less than that of vessel. At pathologic examination, the patient was confirmed to be a grade I responder to chemotherapy, exhibiting 30% necrosis at single-slice pathologic examination.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Representative compartmental model fits of tumor regions of interest for two patients with different chemotherapy responses, with respective model parameters. The amplitude of the model fit is greater for more viable tumor. The transfer coefficient between the vascular and extracellular spaces (kep) is also greater for the grade II responder.

 


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Osteosarcoma grade I (10% necrosis) response at time of definitive surgery. A, Sagittal T1-weighted MR image (24-cm field of view, 256 x 256 matrix, 12-mm section thickness) from the last time point after contrast material administration. B, Parametric image contains the slope of each voxel of the tumor region of interest. A lack of uptake in the central osseous component of the tumor is evident (arrow). C, Parametric model amplitude image of Akep displays a deficit in enhancement in the same region as in B. Static contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image (fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo sequence: 9/2, 256 x 256 matrix, 24-cm field of view, 12-mm section thickness) displayed a fairly uniform pattern of contrast material distribution. However, a greater degree of enhancement is seen in the soft-tissue component of the tumor (arrow) than in the intraosseous region on both parametric images.

 
Analysis parameters that were significantly correlated (P < .01) with the pathologically determined necrotic fraction were the initial slope and Akep. These parameters were determined for each voxel in the tumor region of interest and placed in a histogram distribution normalized to the total number of tumor voxels, as shown in Figure 4. A slope histogram from one patient presented a bimodal distribution that could not be approximated by the single asymmetric function used in this analysis and was therefore excluded from the data set. The bimodal appearance of the distribution was a result of a nonenhancing intraosseous tumor component and an associated highly enhancing extraosseous soft-tissue component. We did not believe it appropriate to arbitrarily select one of the components to be used to characterize the entire tumor; therefore, it was excluded. The amplitude, mean, and width of the slope histograms in the remaining 28 patients as correlated with pathologic examination yielded R values of 0.60 (P < .001), 0.47, and 0.56, respectively.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Initial slope histograms normalized to the total number of tumor voxels for two responders to chemotherapy. The histogram distributions contain the slope values for each voxel in the tumor region of interest. Each distribution was fit with the function shown in Equation (3), and the amplitude, mean, and width were determined. The percentage necrosis was inversely proportional to the distribution width and mean. The amplitude of the distribution was directly proportional to the percentage necrosis.

 
Correlation of the slope histogram amplitude with pathologic findings is presented in Figure 5a. The amplitude, mean, and width of the histogram containing the compartmental model parameter Akep (n = 29) similarly yielded R values of 0.64 (P < .001), 0.46, and 0.58, respectively. Correlation of the compartmental model histogram amplitude with pathologic findings is presented in Figure 5b. Analysis of the Ewing sarcoma population (n = 10) separately resulted in R values of 0.58 (P > .05) and 0.68 (P < .03) for the slope and model parameters, respectively. Identical analysis of the osteogenic sarcoma population (n = 19) resulted in R values of 0.61 (P < .01) and 0.58 (P < .01), respectively.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5a. (a) Correlation between histogram amplitude of the initial slope and pathologically determined necrotic fraction (n = 28). A cutoff value of 1.3 for the histogram amplitude was chosen directly from the receiver operating characteristic curve. (b) Correlation between the histogram amplitude of the model parameter Akep and the pathologically determined necrotic fraction (n = 29). A cutoff value of 2.3 for the histogram amplitude was chosen directly from the receiver operating characteristic curve.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5b. (a) Correlation between histogram amplitude of the initial slope and pathologically determined necrotic fraction (n = 28). A cutoff value of 1.3 for the histogram amplitude was chosen directly from the receiver operating characteristic curve. (b) Correlation between the histogram amplitude of the model parameter Akep and the pathologically determined necrotic fraction (n = 29). A cutoff value of 2.3 for the histogram amplitude was chosen directly from the receiver operating characteristic curve.

 
Logistic regression analysis showed that the initial slope parameter and Akep were each significant predictors of 90% or more necrosis (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve, which gives an overall indication of diagnostic performance without post hoc selection of a particular cutoff value, is shown for the slope and Akep parameters in Figure 6, with areas under the curve of 0.86 and 0.91, respectively. Cutoff values of 1.3 for the initial slope histogram amplitude and 2.3 for the Akep histogram amplitude were used to group patients as responders, as shown in Figure 5a and 5b, respectively. The results for amplitude Akep > 2.3 (approximately the median) were overall accuracy of 83% (24 of 29 patients), sensitivity of 86%, and specificity of 80%. The results for amplitude of slope greater than 1.3 (approximately the 60th percentile) were overall accuracy of 79% (22 of 28 patients), sensitivity of 71%, and specificity of 86%. These specific cutoff values were chosen after the data were analyzed retrospectively and may overestimate the accuracy of the technique. However, the statistical significance of the relationship between these model parameters and the pathologist’s assessment of whether or not there was 90% necrosis was clearly established by means of logistic regression (P < .005 for either Akep or slope methods).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Receiver operating characteristic curves for initial slope and two-compartment model methods, showing areas under the curves of 86% and 91%, respectively.

 
The positive predictive value represents the fraction of patients determined to be responders with MR imaging who are confirmed as such with pathologic examination. Conversely, the negative predictive value represents the fraction of patients determined to be nonresponders with MR imaging who are confirmed as such with pathologic examination. Of the 29 patients in the present study, 14 (48%) had grade III or IV response. For the post hoc slope parameter cutoff, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.71 and 0.83, respectively. For Akep, the positive and negative predictive values were 0.80 and 0.86, respectively.


    Discussion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
In previous studies, contrast material uptake at dynamic enhanced MR imaging of chemotherapeutic response in osteogenic sarcomas has been analyzed (68). The early focus of such analysis was on the initial slope and maximum enhancement parameters and has gradually shifted toward compartmental modeling. Determination of viability in osteogenic sarcomas with dynamic enhanced MR imaging has been studied by Reddick et al (9) and Taylor and Reddick (24) by means of the dynamic vector magnitude. Correlation of the dynamic vector magnitude with Rosen-Huvos grade was shown, and an accuracy of 89.5% was stated. Compartmental model analysis has not yet been correlated with pathologic necrotic fraction. There are advantages to each method, and a comparative study in this field is appropriate. Assessment of tumor perfusion by analyzing initial slope has advantages, including ease of analysis and interpretation of the chosen parameters. In the present study, the initial slope analysis compared favorably with the reduced Hoffman model. Although a more qualitative analysis, it produced results that were statistically significant, quickly processed, and easily interpretable.

A primary advantage in the model analysis is that the shape of the entire time-intensity curve is incorporated and not just the initial slope. Fitting of the entire time course allows curves with similar initial slopes but different rates of washout to be separated. An additional advantage of the model analysis is that it may be adjusted and expanded to accommodate new information that may be gained about the physiologic processes involved in gadopentetate dimeglumine tracer uptake within bone sarcomas. Compartmental modeling also affords the potential to assess physiologically important parameters that are directly related to vascular permeability, vascular perfusion, and extravascular volume (18). Limitations in the model approach are more complex analysis routines and the need for a deeper knowledge of tracer analysis and contrast agent mechanisms. Another difficulty in this model is the inability to determine whether changes in uptake in regions of necrosis are due to variances in flow or permeability. In addition, Tofts (22) has discussed the relevance of incorporating tumor T1 into the modeling scheme. This would allow decreases in slope and Akep to be attributed to endothelial permeability instead of T1. In the present study, although the slope and model methods provided similar correlation with pathologic findings, the inclusion of permeability and vascular volume quantitation may increase the accuracy of the model results. In our study, seeing the entire curve and using a compartmental model was not shown to have an advantage over using just the (simpler) initial slope, perhaps because the complete washout characteristics were not obtained (as a result of insufficient temporal resolution or to insufficient imaging duration).

Factors to be accounted for in understanding the physiologic and angiogenic bases for changes seen in dynamic enhanced MR imaging include, but are not limited to, microvessel density (or fractional blood volume), vascular permeability, and perfusion (25). Knopp et al (26) studied the pathophysiologic basis of dynamic enhanced MR imaging in breast tumors and found significant correlation with the compartmental modeling parameter kep and increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, a biologically active molecule. It was shown that the primary factor that affected contrast enhancement was a change in vascular permeability caused by increased leakage stimulated by expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. This suggests that dynamic enhanced MR imaging might also be valuable in the assessment of angiogenic changes as precursors to event-free survival; further study is needed.

The data correlation weakened because of inherent physical differences between the MR imaging method and the pathologic method, as well as the fact that dynamic enhanced MR imaging and pathologic examination measure different indicators of tumor necrosis (tissue enhancement and histologic tumor necrosis, respectively). MR imaging cannot depict areas of microscopic disease that were included in the necrotic fraction during pathologic examination. Partial volume effects due to the differences between the 10–12-mm MR imaging section and the 5-µm slice taken during pathologic examination likely contributed to the error. The ability of MR imaging to depict tissue throughout the entire heterogeneous tumor compared with the single slice provided at pathologic examination might also contribute to differences in the results. The sampling of a large tumor volume at pathologic examination is prohibitive but is routinely performed with MR imaging. In the present study, the total tumor necrotic fraction as determined at MR imaging was similar to that of a single-plane necrotic fraction, as determined at MR imaging or at pathologic examination.

The clinical utility of this method lies in the ability to noninvasively predict during therapy, in the large majority of cases, whether the tumor has responded to induction chemotherapy with at least 90% necrosis. Although the factors discussed earlier prevent a more accurate estimation of grade I or II responders to chemotherapy, that fact is overshadowed by the knowledge that event-free survival is significantly correlated only with responses of grade III and IV. It is hoped that additional advances in MR imaging technology, compartmental modeling, and other correlative indicators will provide an opportunity to improve the prognostic value of this study to further improve patient care.

In patients with osteogenic or Ewing sarcomas who are undergoing chemotherapy before surgery, the use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the estimation of percentage tumor necrosis may be a valuable method for assessment of treatment response and prognostication. The addition of parametric information relating to tumor uptake may provide information to the surgeon indicating possible extent of disease near specific surgical margins. Pathologic evaluation of necrosis following definitive surgery can be performed only once and is typically carried out only after a prolonged period of induction chemotherapy. Noninvasive and nondestructive testing of tumor viability can be performed early in the course of therapy and serially throughout therapy. This may allow earlier identification of inferior responders, giving clinicians the opportunity to identify a population of patients that may benefit from a change in therapy type or intensity. The goal of the present study was to eventually increase the chances for such interventions to improve subsequent patient outcome. We believe the ability of MR imaging to noninvasively depict the entire tumor to potentially demonstrate clinically relevant patterns of enhancement makes this method attractive for continued investigation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Weiji Shi, MS, for help with the receiver operating characteristic analysis; Patrick Boland, MD, and Edward Athanasian, MD, for contribution of patients to the study; and MR imaging technicians in the Department of Radiology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for their expertise during this study.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, J.P.D., D.B., D.M.P., J.A.K.; study concepts, J.H.H., P.A.M., A.G.H., P.S.T., R.G.; study design, J.P.D., D.M.P., J.A.K., D.B.; literature research, J.P.D., J.H.H., P.S.T.; clinical studies, J.P.D., A.G.H., D.M.P., L.H.S.; data acquisition, J.P.D., J.A.K., L.H.S., D.M.P.; data analysis/interpretation, J.P.D., A.G.H., H.T.T., P.S.T.; statistical analysis, J.P.D., H.T.T.; manuscript preparation, J.P.D., D.M.P., J.A.K., D.B.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, J.P.D., A.G.H., L.H.S., H.T.T., J.H.H., P.S.T., R.G., P.A.M.; manuscript editing, J.P.D., D.B., J.A.K., D.M.P.; manuscript revision/review, J.P.D., D.M.P., J.H.H., all authors


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. De Baere T, Vanel D, Shapeero L, et al. Osteogenic sarcoma after chemotherapy: evaluation with contrast material-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 185:587-592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Meyers PA, Gorlick R, Heller G, et al. Intensification of preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering T12 protocol. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:2452-2458.[Abstract]
  3. Wunder JS, Paulian G, Huvos AG, et al. The pathological response to chemotherapy as a predictor of the oncological outcome of operative treatment of Ewing sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80:1020-1033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pan G, Raymond AK, Carrasco CH, et al. Osteogenic sarcoma: MR imaging after preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology 1990; 174:517-526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Holscher HC, Bloem JL, Nooy MA, et al. The value of MR imaging in monitoring the effect of chemotherapy on bone sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154:763-769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Erlemann R, Sciuk J, Bosse A, et al. Response of osteogenic sarcoma and Ewing sarcoma to preoperative chemotherapy: assessment with dynamic and static MR imaging and skeletal scintigraphy. Radiology 1990; 175:791-796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Reddick W, Langston J, Meyer W, et al. Discrete signal processing of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: statistical validation and preliminary clinical application. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4:397-404.[Medline]
  8. van der Woude HJ, Bloem JL, Hogendoorn PC. Preoperative evaluation and monitoring chemotherapy in patients with high-grade osteogenic and Ewing’s sarcoma: review of current imaging modalities. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27:57-71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Reddick WE, Taylor JS, Fletcher BD. Dynamic MR imaging (DEMRI) of microcirculation in bone sarcoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:277-285.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Lang P, Honda G, Roberts T, et al. Musculoskeletal neoplasm: perineoplastic edema versus tumor on dynamic postcontrast MR images with spatial mapping of instantaneous enhancement rates. Radiology 1995; 197:831-839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Weis LD. The success of limb-salvage surgery in the adolescent patient with osteogenic sarcoma. Adolesc Med 1999; 10:451-458.[Medline]
  12. Hoffer FA, Nikanorov AY, Reddick WE, et al. Accuracy of MR imaging for detecting epiphyseal extension of osteogenic sarcoma. Pediatr Radiol 2000; 30:289-298.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Picci P, Sangiorgi L, Rougraff BT, et al. Relationship of chemotherapy-induced necrosis and surgical margins to local recurrence in osteogenic sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12:2699-2705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Picci P, Sangiorgi L, Bahamonde L, et al. Risk factors for local recurrences after limb-salvage surgery for high-grade osteogenic sarcoma of the extremities. Ann Oncol 1997; 8:899-903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gherlinzoni F, Picci P, Bacci G, Campanacci D. Limb sparing versus amputation in osteogenic sarcoma. Correlation between local control, surgical margins and tumor necrosis: Istituto Rizzoli experience. Ann Oncol 1992; 3(suppl 2):S23-S27.
  16. Buckley DL, Kerslake RW, Blackband SJ, Horseman A. Quantitative analysis of multi-slice gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced dynamic MR images using an automated simplex minimization procedure. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32:646- 651.[Medline]
  17. Henderson E, Rutt BK, Lee TY. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16:1057-1073.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:223-232.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Springfield DS, Schakel ME, Spanier SS. Spontaneous necrosis in osteogenic sarcoma. Clin Orthop 1991; 263:233-237.
  20. Hoffman U, Brix G, Knopp MV, et al. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:506-514.[Medline]
  21. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:621-628.[Medline]
  22. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:91-101.[Medline]
  23. Gumbel EJ. Statistics of extremes New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1958.
  24. Taylor JS, Reddick WE. Evolution from empirical dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to pharmacokinetic MRI. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2000; 41:91-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Bhujwalla ZM, Artemov D, Glockner J. Tumor angiogenesis, vascularization, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:92-103.[Medline]
  26. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:260-266.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. S. Kim, S.-Y. Lee, W. H. Cho, W. S. Song, J.-S. Koh, J. A. Lee, J. Y. Yoo, and D.-G. Jeon
Tumor Necrosis Rate Adjusted by Tumor Volume Change Is a Better Predictor of Survival of Localized Osteosarcoma Patients
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 906 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. Muruganandham, M. Lupu, J. P. Dyke, C. Matei, M. Linn, K. Packman, K. Kolinsky, B. Higgins, and J. A. Koutcher
Preclinical evaluation of tumor microvascular response to a novel antiangiogenic/antitumor agent RO0281501 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T.
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1950 - 1957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. C. Thoeny, F. De Keyzer, V. Vandecaveye, F. Chen, X. Sun, H. Bosmans, R. Hermans, E. K. Verbeken, C. Boesch, G. Marchal, et al.
Effect of Vascular Targeting Agent in Rat Tumor Model: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced versus Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 492 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. van Vliet, C. F. van Dijke, P. A. Wielopolski, T. L. M. ten Hagen, J. F. Veenland, A. Preda, A. J. Loeve, A. M. M. Eggermont, and G. P. Krestin
MR Angiography of Tumor-related Vasculature: From the Clinic to the Micro-environment
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2005; 25(suppl_1): S85 - S97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dyke, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ballon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dyke, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ballon, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE