Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 11, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2282020345
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Quicktime Movies
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2282020345v1
228/2/417    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giorgi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giorgi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaert, J.
(Radiology 2003;228:417-424.)
© RSNA, 2003


Cardiac Imaging

Clinically Suspected Constrictive Pericarditis: MR Imaging Assessment of Ventricular Septal Motion and Configuration in Patients and Healthy Subjects1

Benedetta Giorgi, MD, Nico R. A. Mollet, MD, Steven Dymarkowski, MD, Frank E. Rademakers, MD and Jan Bogaert, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (B.G., N.R.A.M., S.D., J.B.) and Cardiology (F.E.R.), Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Received April 4, 2002; revision requested June 12; final revision received November 25; accepted December 16. B.G. supported by a Marie-Curie Fellowship of the European Commission. Address correspondence to J.B. (e-mail: jan.bogaert@uz.kuleuven.ac.be).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To assess ventricular septal motion and quantify the septal configuration in patients clinically suspected of having constrictive pericarditis (CP), and to compare these patients with healthy subjects and with patients who have other diastolic heart abnormalities such as restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 41 patients clinically suspected of having CP and 12 healthy subjects, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging yielded information about cardiac morphology and function. On short-axis cine MR images, septal motion was assessed, and the septal and left ventricular free wall (LVFW) radii of curvature were quantified and normalized to end systole. Abnormal diastolic septal motion was expressed in terms of the largest difference in normalized radius between the septum and the LVFW. Analysis of variance was used to identify significant differences in septal shape among subject groups.

RESULTS: Left-sided septal flattening was identified in 17 of the 21 patients with surgically proven CP, in none of the 20 patients without CP, and in none of the healthy subjects. CP without septal flattening was present on the left side (n = 1), on the right side (n = 1), and at the atrioventricular grooves (n = 2). Abnormal septal motion yielded a sensitivity of 81% (17 of 21 patients), specificity of 100% (20 of 20 patients), accuracy of 90% (37 of 41 patients), positive predictive value of 100% (17 of 17 patients), and negative predictive value of 83% (20 of 24 patients) in the detection of CP. The maximal difference in normalized radius of curvature between the septum and the LVFW in the patients with CP was significantly different from that in the patients without CP (P < .001) and that in the healthy subjects (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Abnormal diastolic septal motion is a frequent phenomenon of CP. If present in patients suspected of having CP, this finding is helpful in distinguishing CP from RCM.

Supplemental material: Supplemental material: radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2282020345/DC1

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Heart, abnormalities, 51.821, 51.824, 51.86 • Heart, cardiomyopathy, 51.86 • Heart, MR, 51.121411, 51.121412, 51.121416, 51.12144 • Pericarditis, 51.824


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The main characteristic finding of constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a thickened, fibrotic, and/or calcified pericardium constricting the heart and impairing cardiac filling. Diseases that reduce myocardial compliance, such as restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), however, are also characterized by impaired ventricular filling, and the clinical manifestation of these diseases can be very similar to that of CP (1). Distinguishing between the two entities is crucial, because CP can be successfully treated with early pericardiectomy, whereas medical treatment is recommended for RCM (1,2). The current diagnosis of CP and the differentiation between CP and RCM are based on a combination of clinical presentation, visualization of pericardial abnormalities, assessment of cardiac diastolic function and ventricular filling patterns, measurement of cardiac pressures, and, less frequently, findings of endomyocardial biopsy performed to rule out specific myocardial disorders (15).

One of the main manifestations of CP is increased ventricular interdependence, a phenomenon whereby the function of one ventricle is altered by changes in the filling of the other ventricle (3,6). Because with CP the pericardial sac has a fixed volume, the position of the ventricular septum during diastole will depend on the filling characteristics of both ventricles. This phenomenon of pathologic ventricular coupling, or increased ventricular dependence, is a major direct effect of the pericardial inflexibility. The filling pressures are increased, the rate of filling is rapid in early diastole, and the rate of change in ventricular pressure at this time in the cardiac cycle is particularly rapid. This rapid change in ventricular pressure can lead to abrupt changes in septal position, with septal flattening or eventually septal inversion (ie, paradoxical motion) (3). Moreover, this ventricular septal shift is influenced by respiration (7,8). This phenomenon of abnormal septal motion, although already described at echocardiography as a finding fitting the definition of a septal "notch" (3,9), has not to our knowledge been quantified before or correlated with the distribution of pericardial abnormalities.

The purpose of the present study was to assess ventricular septal motion and quantify the septal configuration in patients clinically suspected of having CP, and to compare these patients with healthy subjects and with patients who have other diastolic heart abnormalities.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study Population
Forty-one consecutive patients (24 men, 17 women; mean age, 63 years ± 14 [SD]; age range, 21–79 years) who were clinically suspected of having CP and thus referred for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging between January 1998 and January 2002 were included in the study. All patients had been evaluated previously with electrocardiography, chest radiography, echocardiography, and right heart pressure measurements. Endomyocardial biopsy was performed occasionally—in five patients—to exclude specific myocardial diseases. The diagnosis of CP was made if the patient had objective evidence of impaired cardiac filling (ie, increased filling pressures or echo Doppler ultrasonographic [US] signs of increased ventricular coupling) combined with pericardial thickening. The diagnosis of RCM was made if the patient had impaired cardiac filling (ie, increased filling pressures or no echo Doppler US evidence of respiratory-dependent ventricular coupling) combined with the absence of pericardial thickening.

With the results of all examinations taken into account, 21 of the 41 patients were considered to have CP and subsequently underwent pericardiectomy. Pathologic findings confirmed the presence of CP in all cases. Thirteen of the 41 patients received a diagnosis of RCM. Pericardial effusion was found in another five patients, one of whom was suspected of having an underlying restrictive heart problem. No abnormalities were found in the remaining two patients.

Twelve healthy adults (seven men, five women; mean age, 51 years ± 14; age range, 22–63 years) were also included in the study and served as the reference population. There was a small difference in mean age between the patient and healthy subject groups (P = .02). Individuals were included as healthy subjects if their clinical and echo Doppler US examinations of the heart were normal; they were physically active but not active athletes; they showed no evidence of being overweight or of having chest wall abnormalities or coronary artery, valvular, or hypertensive disease; and they were not taking medication that was known to affect cardiac contractility.

All examinations were performed according to the guidelines of the hospital committee on medical ethics and clinical investigation, and all subjects gave informed consent to be examined for the study.

MR Imaging
MR imaging was performed in 27 patients by using a 1.5-T unit (Magnetom Vision; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) with a high-performance gradient system (maximum gradient amplitude, 25 mT/m; maximum slew rate, 300-µsec rise time), a phased-array body coil, and commercially available electrocardiographic triggering. MR imaging was performed in 14 patients by using a 1.5-T unit (Intera CV; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) with Powertrak 6000 (Philips Medical Systems) gradients (maximum gradient amplitude, 30 mT/m; maximum slew rate, 220-µsec rise time), a dedicated cardiac software package (Philips Medical Systems), a standard five-element synergy cardiac coil, and vector cardiographic possibilities.

The MR imaging examinations began with the acquisition of survey images in three orthogonal planes (transverse, coronal, and sagittal) to localize the heart within the chest. Next, we studied the heart by performing a T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the transverse cardiac short-axis direction during breath holding. Afterward, gradient-echo cine MR images of the heart were acquired by using a breath-hold fast-field-echo (3.2/1.5 [repetition time msec/echo time msec], 20° flip angle, 10-mm section thickness, 240 x 256 matrix, 350-mm field of view) or fast low-angle shot (60/4.8, 20° flip angle, 10-mm section thickness, 180 x 256 matrix, 350-mm field of view) technique, or, more recently, a breath-hold balanced fast-field-echo technique (2.7/1.4, 55° flip angle, 8-mm section thickness, 180 x 256 matrix, 350-mm field of view) in the transverse cardiac short-axis plane.

Thirteen of the 41 MR examinations were performed by using the newer balanced fast-field-echo sequence. The temporal resolution ranged from 30 to 50 msec. The average breath-hold duration was 10–15 seconds per section, depending on the heart rate. The spin-echo and gradient-echo MR images depicted the entire heart.

MR Imaging Analysis
Analysis of cardiac and pericardial morphology.—All MR images were transferred to an offline workstation (Philips Medical Systems) for analysis. The images were analyzed in consensus by two readers, who had 10 (J.B.) and 6 (S.D.) years of experience in cardiac MR imaging studies. The images were presented to the readers for analysis in a random order. For morphologic evaluation of the pericardium, spin-echo and gradient-echo MR images were analyzed. This approach allows one to differentiate a focally thickened or calcified pericardium from pericardial effusion, both of which appear hypointense on T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR images. On gradient-echo MR images, however, a fibrotic or calcified pericardium has low signal intensity in contrast to the high signal intensity of pericardial effusion.

To define the different types of CP, we measured the pericardial thickness by using an electronic caliper and classified the distribution of thickness along the pericardium by using a system similar to that suggested by Rienmüller (10). Type I CP has a global pattern, in which the entire pericardium is thickened or at least both ventricles and part of their corresponding atria are widely involved in the process of pericardial thickening. Type II CP has a focal pattern with a localized distribution of pericardial thickening along one or both atria; when this pattern is present with atrioventricular grooves, the CP is considered to be type IIa, and when this pattern is present and the ventricles are only focally involved, the CP is considered to be type IIb. Type III CP has a left-sided pattern, which means that the pericardium of the left ventricle, and eventually that of the left atrium, is thickened. Type IV CP has a right-sided pattern, with thickening of the pericardium over the right ventricle and eventually over the right atrium. Type V CP has an effusive-constrictive pattern, in which pericardial thickening is associated with effusion.

As in previous studies (4,5,11), in this study, a pericardial thickness of greater than 4 mm was considered abnormal. In the case of pericardial effusion, the maximal transverse size of the effusion was measured. The sizes of the atria and inferior vena cava (IVC) and the shape of the ventricles were visually assessed and classified. The atria were determined to be normal or mildly, moderately, or severely enlarged; the IVC was determined to be normal or enlarged; and the ventricles were determined to be normal, narrowed, or enlarged. A ventricle was defined as narrowed if the lateral ventricular border was flattened such that the ventricle had a tubular rather than normal cone shape. Since the suprahepatic part of the IVC is normally similar in size to the descending aorta at the same level (±2 cm in diameter), we performed a visual comparison to determine whether the IVC was enlarged.

Analysis of cardiac function.—Functional cardiac assessment was performed by loading the gradient-echo MR images into a cine loop to yield dynamic views of cardiac contraction and relaxation. As in the morphologic analysis, in the analysis of cardiac function, all images were studied in consensus by two readers (J.B., S.D.) with experience in cardiac MR imaging. As mentioned earlier herein, our main interest was in assessing septal motion during diastole. First, septal motion was visually assessed on the short-axis view 1 cm beneath the mitral valve plane (ie, subbasal level) and described as normal, septal flattening, or septal inversion. With the same short-axis view, we quantitatively assessed the configuration and shape of the septum by measuring the radius of curvature by means of circle best fitting the central 2 cm of the endocardial border on the left side of the ventricular septum (Fig 1). The more flattened the septum is, the larger the radius of curvature will be, and vice versa. To assess the septal changes during the cardiac cycle, we performed these measurements at all time points of the cine MR imaging examination. The radius of curvature of the left ventricular free wall (LVFW) was determined throughout the cardiac cycle in a similar way.



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Measurement of the septal radius of curvature on a short-axis cine balanced fast-field-echo MR image (2.7/1.4, 55° flip angle, 1.4 x 1.9-mm in-plane resolution) obtained at end diastole in a 63-year-old man with CP. The septal radius of curvature was measured by means of circle best fitting the central 2 cm of the endocardial border on the left side of the ventricular septum.

 
Rather than using absolute radii of curvature, we used normalized values for both the septum and the LVFW. This was done by normalizing the values for the respective end-systolic radii of curvature. This normalization was performed to adjust for differences in ventricular size between subjects. Thus, the normalized radius of curvature at end systole in each subject had, per definition, a value of 1. The end of cardiac systole was determined by using the smallest radius of curvature of the LVFW (6,12). This approach was preferred over normalization to end diastole and over normalization to the cavity circumference because it enables easy depiction of differences in configuration between the septum and the LVFW during early diastole.

In the present study, we used the largest difference between the normalized septal radius of curvature and the normalized LVFW radius of curvature during the first half of diastole to characterize the septal configuration. In cases of paradoxical septal motion, and, thus, of inversion of the ventricular septum, no circle could be drawn on the left side of the intraventricular septum. The septal inversion was then quantified by drawing a similar circle on the right side of the intraventricular septum. Rather than using this value, however, we added the difference in radius of curvature between the right side and the left side, which was based on the last time point before septal inversion, to the left-side value. This is an objective way to express septal inversion (13,14).

Statistical Analysis
All results are expressed as means ± SDs. Analysis of variance with the Scheffé post-hoc test was performed to identify significant differences in septal shape (expressed as the largest difference in normalized radius of curvature between the septum and the LVFW during the first half of diastole) among the patients with CP, the patients without CP, and the healthy subjects. P < .05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Pericardial Morphology
With regard to pericardial morphology, MR imaging depicted abnormal pericardial thickening—either focally or more diffusely affecting the pericardium—in all 21 patients with CP. This thickening was classified as type I (ie, global) in 10 patients, type II (ie, involving focal atria and atrioventricular grooves) in three patients, type IIb (ie, involving focal ventricles) in one patient, type III (ie, left sided) in no patient, type IV (ie, right sided) in seven patients, and type V (ie, effusive-constrictive) in no patient. The abnormal pericardium had a mean thickness of 7.1 mm ± 1.3 (SD) (range, 4–14 mm), and the total length of the abnormally thickened pericardium ranged from 12 to 76 mm.

Of the 13 patients with RCM, only one was found to have pericardial thickening. In this 71-year-old woman, a focally thickened pericardium was found in the apicolateral part of the LVFW. In the patients with pericardial effusion, the effusion size ranged from small (pericardial width < 1 cm) to large (pericardial width > 3 cm).

Cardiac Morphology
Mild to moderate right ventricular narrowing was found in seven of the 21 patients with CP. All seven of these patients presented with right-sided or diffuse pericardial thickening. Left ventricular narrowing was found in one patient with CP. In this 71-year-old man, a large chronic pericardial hematoma compressing the left ventricle and atrium was found at surgery. None of the patients without CP demonstrated ventricular narrowing. Left atrial enlargement was seen in seven of the 21 patients with CP; the enlargement was mild in four patients, moderate in two patients, and severe in one patient. Right atrial enlargement was seen in nine of the 21 patients; the enlargement was mild in six patients, moderate in two patients, and severe in one patient. IVC enlargement was seen in 14 patients.

Of the 13 patients with RCM, nine had left atrial enlargement; the enlargement was mild in two and moderate in seven patients. Ten of the 13 patients with RCM had right atrial enlargement; the enlargement was mild in one patient, moderate in three patients, and severe in six patients. Eleven of the 13 patients had IVC enlargement. In one of the patients with pericardial effusion, important enlargement of both atria and of the IVC was found. Moreover, this patient, a 39-year-old man, had evidence of restrictive inflow physiologic features at echo Doppler US.

Ventricular Septal Motion and Configuration
Visual analysis of the short-axis cine MR images obtained during systole revealed a normal septal configuration (ie, convex to the right) with normal septal motion toward the left ventricular center in all patients. During the first half of diastole, however, an abnormal flattening of the ventricular septum was seen in 17 of the 21 patients with CP (81%) (Fig 2a) (Movie 1, radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2282020345/DC1). Left-sided septal inversion (ie, convex to the left) was seen in two of these 17 patients. As shown in Figure 2 (part b) (Movie 2, radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2282020345/DC1), the flattening was most obvious in the basal one-third of the septum and caused an S-like motion of the ventricular septum.



View larger version (185K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Early diastolic septal flattening depicted on (a) short-axis and (b) transverse balanced fast-field-echo MR images (2.7/1.4, 55° flip angle, 1.4 x 1.9-mm in-plane resolution) obtained in a 63-year-old man with global-type (ie, type I) CP. Four time points of the cardiac cycle are shown: end diastole (top left), end systole (top right), early filling (bottom left), and late filling (bottom right). (b) On the transverse MR images, the diffusely thickened hypointense pericardium (white arrow, top left image) is well seen. Note also the dilated IVC. During early filling, the septum (black arrow, bottom left image in a and b) flattens and regains a normal appearance at the end of diastolic filling.

 


View larger version (189K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Early diastolic septal flattening depicted on (a) short-axis and (b) transverse balanced fast-field-echo MR images (2.7/1.4, 55° flip angle, 1.4 x 1.9-mm in-plane resolution) obtained in a 63-year-old man with global-type (ie, type I) CP. Four time points of the cardiac cycle are shown: end diastole (top left), end systole (top right), early filling (bottom left), and late filling (bottom right). (b) On the transverse MR images, the diffusely thickened hypointense pericardium (white arrow, top left image) is well seen. Note also the dilated IVC. During early filling, the septum (black arrow, bottom left image in a and b) flattens and regains a normal appearance at the end of diastolic filling.

 
Analysis of the distribution of pericardial abnormalities in the four patients who had CP without septal flattening revealed focal pericardial thickening limited to the atrioventricular grooves in two patients (Fig 3), a large left-sided pericardial mass compressing the left atrioventricular groove in the patient with a chronic pericardial hematoma (described earlier herein), and right-sided pericardial thickening in one patient. In the latter patient, cine MR imaging depicted a well-preserved diastolic expansion of the right ventricle and no restrictive inflow pattern. Septal flattening was not seen during diastole in any of the 20 patients without CP or in any of the healthy subjects. Abnormal diastolic septal motion had a sensitivity of 81% (17 of 21 patients), a specificity of 100% (20 of 20 patients), an accuracy of 90% (37 of 41 patients), a positive predictive value of 100% (17 of 17 patients), and a negative predictive value of 83% (20 of 24 patients) for the prediction of CP.



View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. (a) Transverse fast spin-echo MR image (one heartbeat/30, 90° flip angle, 1.4 x 2.0-mm in-plane resolution) obtained at middle diastole in a 61-year-old man with CP and focal pericardial thickening but without diastolic septal flattening. Thickened pericardium is limited to the atrioventricular groove (arrow); normal pericardium is seen over the ventricles. (b) On short-axis gradient-echo segmented fast low-angle shot MR image (one heartbeat/30) obtained at the level of the right atrioventricular groove in the same patient, pericardium (arrow) is hypointense and thickened inferolaterally. No septal flattening is demonstrated. (c) Graph illustrating normalized radii of curvature in this patient. As reference, the normalized radius of curvature at end systole (ES) is 1. {circ} = LVFW, {diamondsuit} = septum.

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. (a) Transverse fast spin-echo MR image (one heartbeat/30, 90° flip angle, 1.4 x 2.0-mm in-plane resolution) obtained at middle diastole in a 61-year-old man with CP and focal pericardial thickening but without diastolic septal flattening. Thickened pericardium is limited to the atrioventricular groove (arrow); normal pericardium is seen over the ventricles. (b) On short-axis gradient-echo segmented fast low-angle shot MR image (one heartbeat/30) obtained at the level of the right atrioventricular groove in the same patient, pericardium (arrow) is hypointense and thickened inferolaterally. No septal flattening is demonstrated. (c) Graph illustrating normalized radii of curvature in this patient. As reference, the normalized radius of curvature at end systole (ES) is 1. {circ} = LVFW, {diamondsuit} = septum.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3c. (a) Transverse fast spin-echo MR image (one heartbeat/30, 90° flip angle, 1.4 x 2.0-mm in-plane resolution) obtained at middle diastole in a 61-year-old man with CP and focal pericardial thickening but without diastolic septal flattening. Thickened pericardium is limited to the atrioventricular groove (arrow); normal pericardium is seen over the ventricles. (b) On short-axis gradient-echo segmented fast low-angle shot MR image (one heartbeat/30) obtained at the level of the right atrioventricular groove in the same patient, pericardium (arrow) is hypointense and thickened inferolaterally. No septal flattening is demonstrated. (c) Graph illustrating normalized radii of curvature in this patient. As reference, the normalized radius of curvature at end systole (ES) is 1. {circ} = LVFW, {diamondsuit} = septum.

 
Changes in the normalized radii of curvature of the septum and the LVFW throughout the cardiac cycle in a healthy subject, a patient with CP, a patient with RCM, and a patient with pericardial effusion are shown in Figure 4. In the healthy subjects, the septal and LVFW configurations had a similar pattern of change throughout the cardiac cycle; this pattern was also seen in the patients with RCM, in the patients with pericardial effusion, and in the patients with CP without septal flattening (Fig 3). The patients with CP and septal flattening had an abrupt increase in the normalized septal radius of curvature during the first half of diastole. In the second half of diastole, the septal shape returned to a shape characterized by a normalized radius of curvature similar to that of the LVFW. The higher the radius of curvature was, the greater the septal flattening was during diastole (Fig 5).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Graphs illustrating changes in the normalized radii of curvature in the septum ({diamondsuit}) and the LVFW ({circ}) during the cardiac cycle in A, a healthy subject; B, a patient with CP; C, a patient with RCM; and D, a patient with pericardial effusion. As a reference, the normalized radius of curvature value at end systole (ES) is 1. Time frame 1 represents end diastole. The configurational changes in the septum and the LVFW, with the exception of those in the patient with CP, are very similar throughout the cardiac cycle. The abnormal configuration of the septum during early filling in the patient with CP is visible as an abrupt increase in the radius of curvature during early filling, with a return to the normal shape in the second half of diastole.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. Graphs illustrating changes in the normalized radii of curvature in the septum ({diamondsuit}) and the LVFW ({circ}) during the cardiac cycle in four different patients with CP; each graph depicts values for one patient. As a reference, the normalized radius of curvature value at end systole (ES) is 1. Time frame 1 represents end diastole. A similar pattern is seen for all of these patients: a peak in the first half of diastole. Although the magnitude of peak flattening varies, in all four patients the normalized radius of curvature at peak flattening exceeds the end-diastolic radius of curvature.

 
When we took into account the largest difference in normalized radius of curvature between the septum and the LVFW during the first half of diastole, the patients with CP (mean largest difference, 0.57 ± 0.56; range, -0.23 to 2.12) were significantly different from both the patients without CP (mean largest difference, -0.04 ± 0.11; range, -0.25 to 0.24; P < .001 at analysis of variance) and the healthy subjects (mean largest difference, -0.02 ± 0.12; range, -0.19 to 0.20; P < .001 at analysis of variance). No significant differences were found between the healthy subjects and the patients without CP (P = .98, analysis of variance) (Fig 6).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Graph illustrating values of maximal difference in normalized radius of curvature between the septum and the LVFW in the first half of diastole in healthy subjects (normal), patients with CP (CP-positive), and patients without CP (CP-negative). A positive value indicates that the septum is flatter than the LVFW. Patients with CP have a significantly flatter septum than do patients without CP and healthy subjects.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Results of the present study, in which we analyzed the motion and configuration of the ventricular septum in patients clinically suspected of having CP, revealed septal flattening during early diastolic filling in the majority of patients with CP—a pattern that was not seen in either the healthy subjects or the patients with RCM or pericardial effusion. Although septal motion abnormalities with CP have been seen at echocardiography, to our knowledge, this is the first report of quantitative MR imaging data on septal motion and configuration throughout the cardiac cycle in which these data were correlated with the presence and distribution of pericardial abnormalities (9,15).

To understand the configuration of the ventricular septum in patients with CP, it is important to be familiar with the appearance of the ventricular septum in normal conditions. The position and configuration of the septum are primarily determined by using the transseptal pressure gradient. In the unloaded or unstressed heart of a living human, the septum has a flat configuration, and the normal concave shape of the septum toward the left ventricle during normal loading conditions is due to a left-to-right positive transseptal pressure gradient (16,17). On the short-axis view, the left ventricle can be seen as a relatively round structure that maintains a regular circular shape during systole because of the symmetric inward motion of its walls (6,12). During diastole, a symmetric outward motion is seen. These findings were confirmed by the present study finding of a similar pattern of change in the radii of curvature of the septum and the LVFW during the cardiac cycle.

Changes in the position and geometry of the ventricular septum occur when there is an acute or chronic imbalance between left and right ventricular loading conditions. During diastole, the septum acts as a compliant membrane between the two ventricles, and the position and geometry of the septum respond to even small alterations in the transseptal pressure gradient. The results of a study performed by Brinker et al (12) showed that the Mueller maneuver (ie, forced inspiration against a closed airway) leads to leftward septal displacement due to acute right ventricular overload, a phenomenon that lasts for only two to three heartbeats after the onset of the Mueller maneuver but persists not only during end diastole but also during systole (6,12). Left-sided septal displacement occurs not only in patients with atrial septal defect and other causes of chronic right ventricular overload but also in patients with mitral stenosis (17,18). The delayed left ventricular filling secondary to the mitral stenosis leads to an abnormal transseptal pressure gradient and accentuated early diastolic septal movement, gradually returning rightward when left filling continues.

The abnormal shape and motion of the septum, such as those seen in the majority of patients with CP in the present study, can be explained in a similar way. Ventricular interdependence is increased owing to the presence of a noncompliant pericardium, which impedes the outward movement of the ventricular free wall during filling (19). Consequently, the instantaneous diastolic transseptal gradient changes and leads to septal reconfiguration and paradoxical motion during filling. In the present study, the flattening was always to the left and most prominent in the basal part of the septum. Since right ventricular filling starts just before left ventricular filling, the septum just below the tricuspid valve is pushed to the left by the right ventricular inflow if expansion of the right ventricular free wall is impeded. Because of the thin aspect of the right ventricular free wall, the influence of pericardial thickening is more pronounced than it is on the left side of the heart. This phenomenon is enhanced during inspiration since the intrathoracic pressure decrease in patients with CP is not transmitted to the ventricles because of the thickened fibrotic pericardium. Thus, a pressure gradient between the left ventricle and the pulmonary veins is created.

Analysis of the normalized radii of curvature in patients with CP reveals similar behavior in the LVFW and the septum during systole. The normalized radii of curvature of the LVFW and the septum are different during early filling: The septal flattening leads to a peak in the septal radius of curvature that often exceeds end-diastolic radius of curvature values, with a gradual return later in diastole to a radius of curvature that is similar to that of the LVFW. This pattern was never seen in either the patients without CP or the healthy subjects in this study.

When the pathophysiologic features of abnormal septal motion with CP are taken into account, septal flattening can be absent with CP if the pericardial thickening does not impede the ventricular expansion but restricts the ventricular filling by constricting the atrioventricular groove(s), or if the constrictive pericardium compresses parts of the heart other than the right ventricle. It should be stressed that even with obvious CP involving the right ventricle, septal flattening may be absent if the ventricular constriction is minimal, as was seen in one patient in the current study.

Compared with echo Doppler US real-time measurements of the inflow patterns and ventricular contraction patterns, MR imaging data are acquired during inspiratory breath holds that last several seconds (7). The effects of respiration on cardiac inflow dynamics, which are essential features for differentiating between CP and RCM at echocardiography, could not be evaluated by using our technique. Nevertheless, septal flattening was observed only in the patients with CP and never in the other patients or healthy subjects. Since the breath-hold cine MR images were acquired at end inspiration, and, thus, right ventricular filling was enhanced, enhancement of the septal flattening in the patients with CP was expected. Real-time MR imaging analysis of ventricular function and flow assessment are now possible and will further extend the role of MR imaging in the examination of patients suspected of having CP. Such recently developed MR imaging techniques in combination with simultaneous registration of respiratory motion will enable one to study the respiratory variations associated with ventricular filling.

In conclusion, MR imaging, by facilitating analysis of diastolic septal motion during ventricular filling, has the potential to enable not only precise visualization of the thickened fibrotic and/or calcified pericardium in patients with CP but also assessment of the severity of pericardial constriction during ventricular filling and expansion. Diastolic septal flattening in patients clinically suspected of having CP is highly suggestive of CP. It should be noted, however, that the absence of diastolic septal flattening does not exclude CP if the ventricular expansion during cardiac filling—especially that on the right side—is not impeded.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: CP = constrictive pericarditis, IVC = inferior vena cava, LVFW = left ventricular free wall, RCM = restrictive cardiomyopathy

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, J.B.; study concepts, J.B.; study design, J.B., F.E.R.; literature research, B.G., N.R.A.M.; clinical studies, S.D., J.B.; data acquisition, S.D., J.B.; data analysis/interpretation, B.G., N.R.A.M., J.B.; statistical analysis, J.B., S.D.; manuscript preparation, B.G., N.R.A.M.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, J.B.; manuscript editing, J.B., B.G.; manuscript revision/review, F.E.R.; manuscript final version approval, J.B.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Myers RBH, Spodick DH. Constrictive pericarditis: clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics. Am Heart J 1999; 138:219-232.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Kushwaha SS, Fallon JT, Fuster V. Restrictive cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:267-276.[Free Full Text]
  3. Hancock EW. Differential diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis. Heart 2001; 86:343-349.[Free Full Text]
  4. Sechtem U, Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB. MRI of the abnormal pericardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147:245-252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB. Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 182:369-373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Guzman PA, Maughan WL, Yin FC, et al. Transseptal pressure gradient with leftward septal displacement during the Mueller manoeuvre in man. Br Heart J 1981; 46:657-662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hatle LK, Appleton CP, Popp RL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1989; 79:165-169.
  8. Nishimura RA. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: a diagnostic dilemma. Heart 2001; 86:619-623.[Free Full Text]
  9. Candell-Riera J, Garcia-del-Castillo H, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Echocardiographic features of the interventricular septum in chronic constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 1978; 57:1154-1158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rienmüller R. Computertomographie versus kernspintomographie in der klinischen diagnostik kardialer erkrankungen. Internist 1990; 31:321-332.[Medline]
  11. Sechtem U, Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB. MRI of the normal pericardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147:239-244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Brinker JA, Weiss JL, Lappé DL, et al. Leftward septal displacement during right ventricular loading in man. Circulation 1980; 61:626-633.[Free Full Text]
  13. Sharkey SW, Shelley W, Carlyle PF, Rysavy J, Cohn JN. M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of the septum in experimental right ventricular infarction: correlation with hemodynamic alterations. Am Heart J 1985; 110:1210-1218.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Beyar R, Dong SJ, Smith ER, Belenkie I, Tyberg JV. Ventricular interaction and septal deformation: a model compared with experimental data. Am J Physiol 1993; 265:H2044-H2056.
  15. Sutton FJ, Whitley NO, Applefield MM. The role of echocardiography and computed tomography in the evaluation of constrictive pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1985; 109:350-355.
  16. Lima JAC, Guzman PA, Yin FC, et al. Septal geometry in the unloaded living human heart. Circulation 1986; 74:463-468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Weyman AE, Wann LS, Feigenbaum H, Dillon JC. Mechanism of abnormal septal motion in patients with right ventricular volume overload: a cross-sectional echocardiographic study. Circulation 1976; 54:179-186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Weyman AE, Heger JJ, Kronik G, Wann LS, Dillon JC, Feigenbaum H. Mechanism of paradoxical early diastolic septal motion in patients with mitral stenosis: a cross-sectional echocardiographic study. Am J Cardiol 1977; 40:691-699.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Santamore WP, Bartlett R, Van Buren SJ, Dowd MK, Kutcher MA. Ventricular coupling in constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 1986; 74:597-602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
I. Yoshioka, Y. Saiki, A. Ichinose, K. Takase, S. Takahashi, T. Ohashi, M. Sato, and K. Tabayashi
Tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging with a finite element model can predict the severity of retrosternal adhesions prior to redo cardiac surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 957 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Belloni, F. De Cobelli, A. Esposito, R. Mellone, G. Perseghin, T. Canu, and A. Del Maschio
MRI of Cardiomyopathy
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1702 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Dellegrottaglie, J. Sanz, M. Poon, J. F. Viles-Gonzalez, R. Sulica, M. Goyenechea, F. Macaluso, V. Fuster, and S. Rajagopalan
Pulmonary Hypertension: Accuracy of Detection with Left Ventricular Septal-to-Free Wall Curvature Ratio Measured at Cardiac MR
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 63 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. K. Eltzschig, D. J. Sugarbaker, T. W. Felbinger, C. M. Boltwood Jr., D. R. Rosing, J. Sagrista-Sauleda, J. Angel, J. Soler-Soler, and E. W. Hancock
Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis
N. Engl. J. Med., May 27, 2004; 350(22): 2310 - 2312.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Quicktime Movies
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2282020345v1
228/2/417    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giorgi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giorgi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaert, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE