Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 30, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2293021098
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2293021098v1
229/3/869    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
(Radiology 2003;229:869-876.)
© RSNA, 2003


Genitourinary Imaging

Living Donor Kidneys: Usefulness of Multi–Detector Row CT for Comprehensive Evaluation1

Jeong-Kon Kim, MD, Soo-Youn Park, MD, Heon-joon Kim, RT, Chung-Soo Kim, MD, Han-Jong Ahn, MD, Tae-Young Ahn, MD and Kyoung-Sik Cho, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (J.K.K., S.Y.P., H.j.K., K.S.C.) and Urology (C.S.K., H.J.A., T.Y.A.), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 388–1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138–736, Korea. Received September 2, 2002; revision requested October 31; final revision received March 21, 2003; accepted March 27. Address correspondence to K.S.C. (e-mail: kscho@amc.seoul.kr).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To evaluate in living renal donors the usefulness of multi–detector row computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of renal vasculature and the upper urinary tract.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four-channel multi–detector row CT scans were obtained in 77 patients. Vascular phase scans were used for CT angiography; excretory phase scans, for CT urography. At CT angiography, two independent observers evaluated the number of arteries and veins and the presence of early-branching arteries. CT urographic images were evaluated with regard to the opacification of the urinary tract and for abnormalities. Findings of CT angiography and urography were compared with surgical findings. Interobserver agreement between CT angiographic and surgical findings was quantified with weighted {kappa} statistics. Sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography in identifying supernumerary vessels and early-branching arteries were also evaluated. To evaluate the radiation dose to patients, weighted CT dose index (DI) was assessed for each scan.

RESULTS: Agreement between CT angiographic and surgical findings was excellent for the number of renal arteries ({kappa} = 0.896) and veins ({kappa} = 0.843). Detection rate of CT angiography was 98% (89 of 91) for arteries and 98% (83 of 85) for veins. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography were 86% (12 of 14) and 100% (65 of 65) for supernumerary arteries, 100% (11 of 11) and 100% (66 of 66) for early-branching arteries, and 75% (six of eight) and 100% (69 of 69) for supernumerary veins. At CT urography, collecting systems and proximal ureters were well opacified in all patients; two patients had underrotated kidneys without obstruction. The weighted CT DI was 10.19 mGy for unenhanced and excretory phase scans and 12.88 mGy for the vascular phase scan.

CONCLUSION: Multi–detector row CT can help assess well the renal vasculature and the urinary tract of living renal donors.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), angiography, 81.12116 • Computed tomography (CT), multi–detector row, 81.12111, 81.12112, 81.12114, 81.12117 • Kidney, CT, 81.12111, 81.12112, 81.12114, 81.12117 • Kidney, transplantation, 81.455 • Urography, 81.1211


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Renal transplantation is the ultimate treatment for end-stage renal disease. Because of the insufficient organ supply to accommodate the continually increasing demands and the longer survival rate of grafts, living donors are preferred to cadaveric donors in renal transplantation. In living donor renal transplantation, precise evaluation of the renal vessels, the parenchyma, and the urinary tract is necessary to determine whether potential donor kidneys are suitable for transplantation.

Many authors have assessed the usefulness of single–detector row helical computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative evaluation of kidneys obtained from living donors and proved that CT angiography can replace conventional angiography (111). However, it is still necessary to improve the performance of CT, because detection of supernumerary arteries is yet incomplete; the sensitivity was 77% in a recent study with a large patient population (6). Furthermore, the use of CT urography has not been attempted in previous studies in which single–detector row helical CT was used because of limitations in obtaining a large data set with thin sections through the entire urinary tract in a single breath hold. Recent technical advances have introduced multi–detector row CT into clinical practice. This imaging modality allows thinner section imaging, faster scanning, and improved longitudinal spatial resolution than does single–detector row helical CT (12,13). These advantages can provide greater coverage during a single breath hold and reduce motion and partial volume artifacts. Therefore, the use of multi–detector row CT is anticipated to advance the quality of three-dimensional images generated from the CT data.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in living renal donors the use of multi–detector row CT in the assessment of renal vasculature and the upper urinary tract.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board for Human Investigation, and signed informed consents were obtained from all patients.

Patients
Between July 2000 and July 2001, a total of 83 consecutive patients (39 men and 44 women; age range, 19–52 years; mean age ± SD, 38 years ± 9) were evaluated as potential living donors for renal transplantation. Among them, six patients were excluded because of urinary calculi (n = 3), a severe renal scar (n = 2), or a horseshoe kidney (n = 1), which were diagnosed at CT. Therefore, a total of 77 patients (age range, 19–52 years; mean age, 38 years ± 9), which included 36 men (age range, 25–52 years; mean age, 37 years ± 8) and 41 women (age range, 19–52 years; mean age, 39 years ± 12), were enrolled in a renal transplantation program; there was no difference in the age distribution between men and women.

CT Protocol
All CT data were obtained with a four-channel multi–detector row CT scanner (LightSpeed QX/i; General Electric Medical System, Milwaukee, Wis). Unenhanced, vascular phase, and phase scans were obtained during a breath hold. X-ray tube voltage, tube current, and gantry rotation time for all scans were 120 kV, 200 mA, and 0.8 second per rotation, respectively.

Unenhanced scans were obtained from the 11th thoracic vertebral body to the ischial tuberosities, with a detector array of 2.5 x 4 mm, a beam pitch of 1.5 (equivalent to a section pitch of 6, high-speed mode), a table speed of 15 mm per rotation (18.75 mm/sec), and a reconstruction increment of 2.5 mm. The mean acquisition time was 17 seconds ± 2. Thereafter, iopamidol (Iopamiro 300; Bracco, Milan, Italy) was intravenously administered into the antecubital vein through an 18-gauge angiographic catheter by using a mechanical injector; 140 mL was administered at a rate of 4.0 mL/sec for patients with a body weight 60 kg or greater (n = 58) and 130 mL at a rate of 3.0 mL/sec for patients (n = 19) with a body weight of less than 60 kg.

The start time of the vascular phase scanning was determined by using automatic bolus tracking. Scanning was initiated with a start delay of 5 seconds after triggering at a threshold of 80 HU in the region of interest, which was placed in the abdominal aorta at the level of the renal arteries. With this technique, scanning began 24–31 seconds (mean, 27 seconds) after intravenous injection of contrast material. Scan coverage for the vascular phase, which was determined by referring to the prior unenhanced scan, was from the celiac axis to the common iliac arteries. The parameters for the vascular phase scan included a detector array of 1.25 x 4 mm, a beam pitch of 1.5, a table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation (9.38 mm/sec), and a reconstruction increment of 0.5 mm. The mean acquisition time was 18 seconds ± 1. Excretory phase scanning started 180 seconds after intravenous injection of contrast material and extended from the diaphragm to the ischial tuberosities. The parameters included a detector array of 2.5 x 4 mm, a beam pitch of 1.5, a table speed of 15 mm per rotation (18.75 mm/sec), and a reconstruction increment of 1.25 mm. The mean acquisition time was 20 seconds ± 2.

Image Processing and Analysis
Immediately after the CT data were obtained, a radiologist (J.K.K) briefly reviewed the vascular phase CT images with regard to whether renal vessels were adequately enhanced; adequate enhancement was considered when both renal arteries and veins were well opacified throughout their entire length and the renal arteries could be easily differentiated from the renal veins, as the arteries enhanced stronger than did the veins.

The CT data sets were transferred to a workstation (Advantage Windows 3.0; General Electric Medical System). The CT data were manipulated by an experienced technologist (H.j.K.) who had worked in the three-dimensional image laboratory of our institution for 3 years. If he had any questions or technical difficulties during image processing, he consulted one of several genitourinary radiologists (J.K.K., S.Y.P., K.S.C.). CT data of the vascular phase were used for CT angiography. First, the technologist segmented the kidney, renal arteries, renal veins, aorta, inferior vena cava, and perinephric fat from the raw CT images by manually drawing a three-dimensional region of interest, which was prescribed by using a maximum intensity projection (MIP). Thereafter, he removed all of the other structures while attempting to avoid deleting the regions of interest. In this model, additional detailed editing was performed to eliminate irrelevant structures, such as the mesenteric and lumbar arteries, and residual bony structures. From these edited CT data, subsequent three-dimensional images were reconstructed by using volume rendering and MIP, which were photographed at 15° increments of rotation along the z axis of the body at window and level settings for optimal vascular demonstration.

Three-dimensional images reconstructed by the technologist were independently reviewed by two radiologists (J.K.K., S.Y.P) at a workstation. Thereafter, both radiologists independently evaluated the renal vessels in oblique coronal and oblique transverse planes using thin-slab MIPs of the raw CT images, which had not been edited by the technologist. The slab thickness was arbitrarily applied from 2 to 15 mm in each case. If there was a discrepancy between the thin-slab MIP images made by the radiologist and the volume-rendered or MIP images made by the technologist, each radiologist made a final decision after reevaluating all of those images.

On the three-dimensional images, the two radiologists independently evaluated the number of arteries and veins and the presence of early-branching arteries, late venous confluence, arterial abnormalities such as stenosis or calcified plaque, and venous abnormalities such as a retroaortic or circumaortic vein. The different observations made by the two reviewers were then resolved by consensus.

When the kidney had two or more arteries or veins, the vessel with the greatest diameter was considered to be dominant and the others, supernumerary. An early-branching artery was determined to be present when any branch diverged within 1.5 cm from the aorta, and late venous confluence was indicated when veins joined within 1 cm from the inferior vena cava.

CT urographic images were reconstructed from the excretory phase CT data, without preliminary editing by the technologist, by using MIP (n = 31) or an average intensity projection (n = 46) in either coronal or oblique coronal plane. The slab thickness was arbitrarily determined to include both pelvocalyces and ureters. The two radiologists independently reviewed the CT urographic images with regard to whether the entire urinary tract was well opacified and whether there were structural abnormalities in the urinary tract. Different interpretations by the two reviewers were also resolved by consensus. When the entire urinary tract was not completely opacified, we performed an additional intravenous urography examination to confirm normal urine passage throughout the upper urinary tract.

In addition to CT angiography and urography, the first reviewer (J.K.K.) evaluated the presence of a renal parenchymal abnormality, such as a tumor or a scar, and an abnormality in the other abdominal organs.

Surgical Correlation
Seventy-seven of 154 kidneys were donated for transplantation, with urologists (T.Y.A., C.S.K., H.J.A.) using an open extraperitoneal approach; therefore, surgical confirmation of CT findings was obtained in these 77 kidneys. The donated kidneys were selected on the basis of CT findings; presence of a complex vascular anatomy was the principal consideration, and, if vascular anatomy was simple and the urinary tract was normal, the left kidney was preferred for donation because of its greater venous length. Surgeons recorded the number of arteries, early-branching arteries, and veins in each kidney by using the same criteria as those used in CT angiography, as well as any abnormality in the vessels and the urinary tract. Findings of CT angiography and CT urography were compared with surgical findings in the 77 donated kidneys.

Statistical Analysis
Interobserver agreement between the two reviewers and between CT angiographic and surgical findings was quantified by using weighted {kappa} statistics; {kappa} of <0.20 was considered poor; 0.21–0.40, fair; 0.41–0.60, moderate; 0.61–0.80, good; and 0.81–1.00, excellent. Interobserver agreement between the two reviewers was assessed from the data of independent reviews by the two reviewers, and agreement between CT angiographic and surgical findings was evaluated from the consensus data of the two reviewers and the surgical findings.

Considering surgical findings as the standard, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography in identifying supernumerary vessels and early-branching arteries.

Weighted CT Dose Index
For the evaluation of the radiation dose to patients, we recorded the manufacturer-reported weighted CT dose index (DI) for each scan, which was demonstrated on the CT console. The weighted CT DI is defined (14) as DI consisting of two-thirds of the peripheral CT DI100 plus one-third the central CT DI100; CT DI100 is a DI based on CT DI measurements over a 100-mm volume (14), and CT DI is demonstrated with the methodology in compliance with federal regulation (15).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In all patients, renal arteries and veins were adequately enhanced throughout their entire length, and renal arteries could be easily differentiated from renal veins because arteries showed stronger enhancement than did veins.

Renal Arteries
Both reviewers agreed on the number of arteries (n = 179) in 146 (95%) of 154 kidneys (Table 1); interobserver agreement was excellent ({kappa} = 0. 856; 95% CI: 0.808, 0.904). In the remaining eight kidneys with disagreement, the first reviewer observed 17 arteries and the second reviewer noted 15 arteries. The two reviewers reached a consensus that those kidneys had 17 arteries. As a result, CT angiography depicted a total of 196 arteries in the 154 kidneys; 37 (24%) kidneys had multiple arteries (Fig 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Interobserver Agreement between Two Radiologists for the Number of Renal Arteries in Each Kidney

 


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor whose left kidney was donated; surgeons confirmed two arteries and one vein. Anterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP show two arteries (straight arrows) and one vein (black bent arrow in a) of the left kidney and one artery of the right kidney (arrowheads). Presence of a small supernumerary artery (double white arrows) and two veins (white bent arrows) of the right kidney is only suspicious but not clearly revealed. (c, d) Oblique coronal images with a thin-slab MIP clearly demonstrate a supernumerary artery (arrows in c) and two veins (arrows and arrowheads in d) of the right kidney.

 


View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor whose left kidney was donated; surgeons confirmed two arteries and one vein. Anterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP show two arteries (straight arrows) and one vein (black bent arrow in a) of the left kidney and one artery of the right kidney (arrowheads). Presence of a small supernumerary artery (double white arrows) and two veins (white bent arrows) of the right kidney is only suspicious but not clearly revealed. (c, d) Oblique coronal images with a thin-slab MIP clearly demonstrate a supernumerary artery (arrows in c) and two veins (arrows and arrowheads in d) of the right kidney.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1c. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor whose left kidney was donated; surgeons confirmed two arteries and one vein. Anterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP show two arteries (straight arrows) and one vein (black bent arrow in a) of the left kidney and one artery of the right kidney (arrowheads). Presence of a small supernumerary artery (double white arrows) and two veins (white bent arrows) of the right kidney is only suspicious but not clearly revealed. (c, d) Oblique coronal images with a thin-slab MIP clearly demonstrate a supernumerary artery (arrows in c) and two veins (arrows and arrowheads in d) of the right kidney.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1d. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor whose left kidney was donated; surgeons confirmed two arteries and one vein. Anterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP show two arteries (straight arrows) and one vein (black bent arrow in a) of the left kidney and one artery of the right kidney (arrowheads). Presence of a small supernumerary artery (double white arrows) and two veins (white bent arrows) of the right kidney is only suspicious but not clearly revealed. (c, d) Oblique coronal images with a thin-slab MIP clearly demonstrate a supernumerary artery (arrows in c) and two veins (arrows and arrowheads in d) of the right kidney.

 
With regard to the presence of early-branching arteries, the two reviewers agreed in 150 (97%) of the 154 kidneys; in those 150 kidneys, 18 kidneys were observed to have early bifurcation. Interobserver agreement was also excellent ({kappa} = 0.885; 95% CI: 0.829, 0.941). In the remaining four kidneys with disagreement, consensus was reached that two kidneys had early bifurcation. Therefore, CT angiography demonstrated that 20 (13%) of the 154 kidneys had early bifurcation.

On the basis of CT angiographic findings, 53 left and 24 right kidneys were chosen for donor nephrectomy. In those kidneys, surgeons identified a total of 91 arteries; 65 kidneys had single arteries, 11 kidneys had two arteries in each kidney, and one kidney had four arteries. Therefore, 12 kidneys had 14 supernumerary arteries. Surgeons also found 11 early-branching arteries. Both reviewers agreed that there was no arterial abnormality such as stricture or calcified plaque.

In the 77 donated kidneys, the first reviewer observed 11 supernumerary arteries and 11 early-branching arteries, whereas the second reviewer noted 12 supernumerary arteries and 10 early-branching arteries. The two reviewers reached the consensus that there were 12 supernumerary and 11 early-branching arteries.

On the basis of the consensus of the two reviewers regarding the number of renal arteries, CT angiographic findings agreed with surgical findings in 75 (97%) of the 77 kidneys (Table 2, Fig 2). Each of the remaining two kidneys with disagreement between CT angiographic and surgical findings had a supernumerary artery. Therefore, the detection rate of CT angiography was 98% (89 of 91 arteries), and the agreement between CT angiographic and surgical findings was excellent ({kappa} = 0.896; 95% CI: 0.753, 1.038) (Table 2). The two supernumerary arteries, which were 1.5 and 2.0 mm in diameter, were noted only at surgery but not at prospective CT angiography. Both were identified at retrospectively reconstructed CT angiography (Fig 3). Therefore, the retrospective detection rate of CT angiography for arteries was 100%. Both of the missed arteries were tied off because they were too small to be anastomosed to the recipient arterial system. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography in identifying supernumerary arteries were 79% (11 of 14) and 100% (65 of 65) for the first reviewer, 79% (11 of 14) and 98% (64 of 65) for the second reviewer, and 86% (12 of 14) and 100% (65 of 65) for the consensus between the two reviewers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Agreement between CT Angiographic and Surgical Findings for the Number of Renal Arteries in Each Kidney

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor who donated a left kidney and in whom surgeons confirmed a supernumerary artery and vein. Anterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP show supernumerary artery (arrows) and a vein (arrowheads) to the lower pole of the left kidney, originating from the right common iliac artery and vein. (c) Oblique transverse thin-slab MIP demonstrates a supernumerary artery (white arrows) from the right common iliac artery (arrowheads). Black arrow = left common iliac artery. (d) Oblique coronal thin-slab MIP shows a supernumerary vein (arrows) from the lower pole of the left kidney to the right common iliac vein.

 


View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor who donated a left kidney and in whom surgeons confirmed a supernumerary artery and vein. Anterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP show supernumerary artery (arrows) and a vein (arrowheads) to the lower pole of the left kidney, originating from the right common iliac artery and vein. (c) Oblique transverse thin-slab MIP demonstrates a supernumerary artery (white arrows) from the right common iliac artery (arrowheads). Black arrow = left common iliac artery. (d) Oblique coronal thin-slab MIP shows a supernumerary vein (arrows) from the lower pole of the left kidney to the right common iliac vein.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor who donated a left kidney and in whom surgeons confirmed a supernumerary artery and vein. Anterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP show supernumerary artery (arrows) and a vein (arrowheads) to the lower pole of the left kidney, originating from the right common iliac artery and vein. (c) Oblique transverse thin-slab MIP demonstrates a supernumerary artery (white arrows) from the right common iliac artery (arrowheads). Black arrow = left common iliac artery. (d) Oblique coronal thin-slab MIP shows a supernumerary vein (arrows) from the lower pole of the left kidney to the right common iliac vein.

 


View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2d. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor who donated a left kidney and in whom surgeons confirmed a supernumerary artery and vein. Anterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP show supernumerary artery (arrows) and a vein (arrowheads) to the lower pole of the left kidney, originating from the right common iliac artery and vein. (c) Oblique transverse thin-slab MIP demonstrates a supernumerary artery (white arrows) from the right common iliac artery (arrowheads). Black arrow = left common iliac artery. (d) Oblique coronal thin-slab MIP shows a supernumerary vein (arrows) from the lower pole of the left kidney to the right common iliac vein.

 


View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor in whom a supernumerary artery to the left kidney (LK) was missed at prospective evaluation of CT angiography but was found at surgery. Retrospectively reconstructed posterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP and (c) oblique coronal thin-slab MIP show a supernumerary artery (arrows) below the dominant artery (arrowheads) to the left kidney. RK = right kidney

 


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor in whom a supernumerary artery to the left kidney (LK) was missed at prospective evaluation of CT angiography but was found at surgery. Retrospectively reconstructed posterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP and (c) oblique coronal thin-slab MIP show a supernumerary artery (arrows) below the dominant artery (arrowheads) to the left kidney. RK = right kidney

 


View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3c. CT angiographic images in a living renal donor in whom a supernumerary artery to the left kidney (LK) was missed at prospective evaluation of CT angiography but was found at surgery. Retrospectively reconstructed posterior images obtained with (a) volume rendering and (b) MIP and (c) oblique coronal thin-slab MIP show a supernumerary artery (arrows) below the dominant artery (arrowheads) to the left kidney. RK = right kidney

 
In regard to the presence of early-branching arteries, CT angiographic findings agreed with surgical findings in all of the 77 kidneys. Therefore, the detection rate of early-branching arteries was 100% (11 of 11) (excellent agreement, {kappa} = 1). The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography in identifying early-branching arteries were 100% (11 of 11) and 100% (66 of 66) for the first reviewer, 91% (10 of 11) and 100% (66 of 66) for the second reviewer, and 100% (11 of 11) and 100% (66 of 66) for the consensus between the two reviewers.

Renal Veins
The two reviewers agreed on the number of veins and the presence or absence of late confluence or venous abnormalities in 150 (97%) of 154 kidneys; interobserver agreement was excellent ({kappa} = 0. 861; 95% CI: 0.793, 0.929) (Fig 2). The two reviewers disagreed on whether each kidney had two veins or one vein of late confluence in the remaining four (3%) kidneys, all of which were right kidneys. The two reviewers reached the consensus that two of those kidneys had two veins each, and the other kidneys had a single vein with late confluence. Therefore, CT angiography demonstrated a total of 175 veins, including 95 (54%) veins in the right kidney and 80 (46%) veins in the left kidney. Sixteen (21%) of 77 right kidneys and three (4%) of 77 left kidneys had multiple veins. Twelve (16%) patients had late venous confluence (eight patients in the right and four patients in the left kidney). Three patients (4%) had circumaortic left renal veins, and two (3%) patients had retroaortic left renal veins.

In the 77 donated kidneys, surgeons identified a total of 85 veins; 69 (90%) kidneys had a single vein, eight (10%) kidneys had two veins in each kidney, and two (3%) kidneys had veins with late confluence. At CT angiography, the two reviewers agreed on the number of veins in all (100%) of the 77 kidneys; they found six kidneys with two veins and two kidneys with one vein at late confluence. Therefore, CT angiography depicted 83 (98%) of 85 renal veins that were identified during surgery, and the agreement between CT angiographic and surgical findings was excellent ({kappa} = 0.843; P < .001; 95% CI: 0.735, 0.952). The sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography in depicting supernumerary veins were 75% (six of eight) and 100% (69 of 69), respectively. Both of the two veins missed at CT angiography were tied because they were as small as 2 mm in diameter, and both of them were identified in the retrospective evaluation.

Urinary Tract Findings
Interpretation of CT urographic findings was concordant between the two reviewers in all patients. At CT urography, both pelvocalyces and proximal ureters that would be removed for transplantation were well opacified in all patients. The distal or the middle part of ureters were not opacified in 10 (6%) patients, and additionally performed intravenous urography revealed normal contrast material passage throughout the urinary tract in all of those patients. Two patients had incomplete duplication in the unilateral urinary tract, in which the upper and lower ureters joined at the proximal ureter. These kidneys were not donated because of increased surgical difficulty. Another two patients had mild under-rotation of the left kidney. In these kidneys, the renal pelvis was slightly dilated, but CT urography demonstrated normal contrast material passage throughout the entire urinary tract (Fig 4). Therefore, these kidneys were donated for transplantation. In 77 donated kidneys, surgical and CT urographic findings were concordant.



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. (a) Anterior and (b) coronal oblique CT urographic images obtained with MIP show under-rotation of the left kidney. The contrast material passage is normal despite dilatation of the left renal pelvis.

 


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. (a) Anterior and (b) coronal oblique CT urographic images obtained with MIP show under-rotation of the left kidney. The contrast material passage is normal despite dilatation of the left renal pelvis.

 
Other Findings
Twenty-four (16%) kidneys had 37 simple cysts that were less than 2 cm in diameter, and five kidneys had mild scars; kidneys with these minor abnormalities did not affect donor nephrectomy. One patient had a 4-cm-diameter hypervascular mass in the liver. For this lesion, ultrasonography-guided biopsy was performed, and histologic examination confirmed focal nodular hyperplasia. This lesion did not affect donor nephrectomy.

Radiation Dose
The weighted CT DI was 10.19 mGy for each of the unenhanced and excretory phase scans and 12.88 mGy for the vascular phase scan. Therefore, the weighted CT DI for the entire CT examination was 33.26 mGy for each patient.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we used a four-channel multi–detector row CT scanner with a nominal section thickness of 1.25 or 2.5 mm, a beam pitch of 1.5, and a table speed of 9.38 (detector array of 1.25 x 4 mm) or 18.75 mm/sec (detector array of 2.5 x 4 mm), which is contrary to previous studies in which single–detector row helical CT scanners with a section thickness of 3 mm, a pitch of 1.5–2, and a table speed of 6–8 mm/sec were used. These differences in scanning parameters mean that multi–detector row CT can provide a twofold or faster scanning and can obtain more compact volume data than does a single–detector row helical CT scanner. Moreover, stair-step artifacts that were introduced as a result of the interpolation of the helical CT data into transverse sections are quantitatively and subjectively smaller with multi–detector row CT than with single–detector row helical CT (13). Thus, three-dimensional image quality can be improved with use of multi–detector row CT.

Adequate vascular enhancement, which is one of the key factors for high-quality angiograms, is greatly affected by scanning delay. Scanning delay for adequate vascular enhancement can vary widely according to various patient factors. Rubin (16) and Sandstede et al (17) commented that with age there is a substantial increase in the peak transit time of contrast medium from the antecubital vein to the abdominal aorta. Kaatee et al (18) showed that CT angiography of the renal arteries can be performed best with a scanning delay based on the transit time of a test bolus injection. In our study, according to our preliminary experience, we used a scanning delay of 5 seconds after triggering at a threshold of 80 HU in the region of interest located in the abdominal aorta at the renal hilar level. By using this method, the scanning delay varied widely, from 24 to 31 seconds (mean, 27 seconds), as was already demonstrated in previous reports (16,17), and vascular enhancement was adequate in all patients.

In this study, we used a thin–slab MIP technique for vascular assessment, as well as volume rendering and MIP. This technique needs minimal computational complexity, because the volume is restricted to a thin slab that is only several voxel widths in depth (19), and segmentation for organ of interest is not necessary. Therefore, with this technique less time is needed and information about adjacent structures can be provided. On the basis of these advantages, a thin-slab MIP technique seems to be able to play a supplementary role in depicting small vessels, the presence of which was suspicious but not clearly depicted with volume rendering or MIP.

The performance of CT angiography in our study seems to be superior to that in previous studies. According to our data, CT angiographic findings agreed with surgical findings regarding the number of arteries in 97% of donated kidneys, in comparison with previously reported values of 90%–95% (410). Interobserver agreement for the interpretation of CT angiographic findings between the two reviewers is higher in our study ({kappa} = 0.856) than it was in a comparative study ({kappa} = 0.73) (8). Both sensitivity and specificity for detecting supernumerary arteries are also higher in our study (86% and 100%, respectively) than they were in a study with a large population (77% and 89%, respectively) (6). We believe that multi–detector row CT, automatic bolus tracking, and advanced three-dimensional reconstruction techniques contributed to this improvement.

In our study, CT urography was used for evaluating the urinary tract of potential kidney donors. Recently, CT urography has become more feasible since multi–detector row CT was introduced into clinical practice (2022). We generated CT urographic images from the excretory phase CT data. In previous studies, the excretory phase CT data have been used only for the evaluation of a renal parenchymal abnormality (4,8,10), and urinary tract was assessed with a CT scanogram or a screen-film radiograph.

There may be some doubts regarding the application of CT urography for the preoperative evaluation of living donor kidneys, because the necessary observations are simple for these kidneys, that is, focus on the detection of unsuspected urinary obstruction or ureteral duplication. Moreover, previous reports have already demonstrated that a CT scanogram or screen-film radiograph is sufficient for urinary tract evaluation. However, a CT scanogram may be limited by the relatively poor spatial resolution (<1 line pair per millimeter) (23), and screen-film radiograph may cause complexity of examinations, because patients should be immediately transferred to a urography suite within a few minutes of the initiation of the main bolus of contrast material at CT. With CT urography in our study, the urinary tract, as well as the renal parenchyma, can be demonstrated with high resolution, and all components of the donor kidney, including vessels, the parenchyma, and the urinary tract, can be evaluated thoroughly in a single session.

Another major criticism may arise against increased radiation dose, in particular that caused by an additional third CT acquisition for CT urography. To reduce radiation dose, we used a tube current of 200 mA, which is slightly lower than that used in previous studies (210–300 mA), a short gantry rotation time (0.8 second per rotation), and a high-speed mode (section pitch of 6, equivalent to beam pitch of 1.5). In our study, the weighted CT DI for the entire CT examination was 33.26 mGy for each patient, which satisfies a proposed guideline of 35 mGy for general abdominal CT (24). It may be possible to reduce more of the radiation dose by changing a detector array and the tube current value. Furthermore, overlapping reconstruction can substitute an excessively thin-section scanning, which potentially increases radiation dose. However, it should not be overlooked that excessive reduction of radiation dose as a result of lowering the tube current or changing detector array may deteriorate the image quality. Therefore, the CT protocol should be balanced between the radiation dose and the image quality. We hope that a future study will be performed to determine a reasonable CT protocol.

A potential limitation of this study is that the surgeons preferentially removed the kidney that had less complicated vascular anatomy. Therefore, the kidneys with more complex vessels had no pathologic proof, and the sensitivity and specificity values were given only for the less-complicated kidneys.

In our study, we used a four-channel multi–detector row CT scanner. Therefore, all parameters for CT acquisition and intravenous contrast material injection were determined to a four-channel system and should be changed in a further advanced system. Recently, a 16-channel system has been developed, which can surprisingly increase the scanning speed without requiring additional output from the x-ray tube. With this system, abdomen and pelvis could be scanned in 7 or 8 seconds, with a 2.5-mm nominal section thickness and a table speed of 120 mm/sec (detector array of 1.5 x 16 mm, pitch of 2.0, gantry rotation time of 0.4 second).

In summary, with use of a four-channel multi–detector row CT scanner, CT angiography can allow vascular assessment and dedicated CT urography can be performed. Given the merits of this advanced technology, we believe that multi–detector row CT may improve the performance of CT in the comprehensive evaluation of living renal donors.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: DI = dose index, MIP = maximum intensity projection

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, K.S.C.; study concepts and design, K.S.C., J.K.K.; literature research, S.Y.P., H.j.K.; clinical studies, C.S.K., H.J.A., T.Y.A.; data acquisition, J.K.K., S.Y.P.; data analysis/interpretation, J.K.K., S.Y.P., K.S.C.; statistical analysis, J.K.K.; manuscript preparation and editing, J.K.K.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, revision/review, and final version approval, J.K.K., K.S.C.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 1995; 195:457-462.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Alfrey EJ, Rubin GD, Kuo PC, et al. The use of spiral computed tomography in the evaluation of living donors for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1995; 59:643-645.[Medline]
  3. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, Reige KA, Konnak JW, Leichtman AB. Potential renal donors: comparison of conventional imaging with helical CT. Radiology 1996; 198:419-423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, Reige K. Helical CT evaluation of potential kidney donors: findings in 154 subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1325-1330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cochran ST, Krasny RM, Danovitch GM, et al. Helical CT angiography for examination of living renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1569-1573.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pozniak MA, Balison DJ, Lee FT, Jr, Tambeaux RH, Uehling DT, Moon TD. CT angiography of potential renal transplant donors. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:565-587.[Abstract]
  7. Manu MA, Tanabe K, Ishikawa N, et al. Comparative study of helical CT scan angiography and conventional arteriography for evaluation of living renal transplant donors. Transplant Proc 1999; 31:2883-2884.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Halpern EJ, Mitchell DG, Wechsler RJ, Outwater EK, Moritz MJ, Wilson GA. Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography. Radiology 2000; 216:434-439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rankin SC, Jan W, Koffman CG. Noninvasive imaging of living related kidney donors: evaluation with CT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:349-355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dachman AH, Newmark GM, Mitchell MT, Woodle ES. Helical CT examination of potential kidney donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:193-200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kaynan AM, Rozenblit AM, Figueroa KI, et al. Use of spiral computerized tomography in lieu of angiography for preoperative assessment of living renal donors. J Urol 1999; 161:1769-1775.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, Kee S, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC. CT angiography of the aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector–row CT. Radiology 2000; 215:670-676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Paik DS, et al. Stair-step artifacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT. Radiology 2000; 216:185-196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. International Electrotechnical Commission Publication no. Medical electrical equipment: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography (part 2–44) 60601–2-44. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, 1999.
  15. 49 Federal Register 171 (codified at 21 CFR 1020) 1987.
  16. Rubin GD. Helical CT of potential living renal donors: toward a greater understanding. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:601-604.[Medline]
  17. Sandstede JJ, Tschammler A, Beer M, Vogelsang C, Wittenberg G, Hahn D. Optimization of automatic bolus tracking for timing of the arterial phase of helical liver CT. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1396-1400.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Kaatee R, Van Leeuwen MS, De Lange EE, et al. Spiral CT angiography of the renal arteries: should a scan delay based on a test bolus injection or a fixed scan delay be used to obtain maximum enhancement of the vessels? J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22:541-547.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Napel S, Rubin GD, Jeffrey RB, Jr. STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:832-838.[Medline]
  20. Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi–detector row CT urography. Radiology 2002; 222:353-360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Chow LC, Sommer FG. Multidetector CT urography with abdominal compression and three-dimensional reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:849-855.[Free Full Text]
  22. Heneghan JP, Kim DH, Leder RA, DeLong D, Nelson RC. Compression CT urography: a comparison with IVU in the opacification of the collecting system and ureters. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25:343-347.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Vrtiska TJ, et al. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography. Radiology 2001; 221:395-403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Menzel HG, Schibila H, Teunen D, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography 2002. Available at: www.drs.dk. Accessed August 15.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Raman, S. Pojchamarnwiputh, K. Muangsomboon, P. G. Schulam, H. A. Gritsch, and D. S. K. Lu
Surgically Relevant Normal and Variant Renal Parenchymal and Vascular Anatomy in Preoperative 16-MDCT Evaluation of Potential Laparoscopic Renal Donors
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 105 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Rastogi, D. V. Sahani, M. A. Blake, D. C. Ko, and P. R. Mueller
Evaluation of Living Renal Donors: Accuracy of Three-dimensional 16-Section CT
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 136 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Raman, S. Pojchamarnwiputh, K. Muangsomboon, P. G. Schulam, H. A. Gritsch, and D. S. K. Lu
Utility of 16-MDCT angiography for comprehensive preoperative vascular evaluation of laparoscopic renal donors.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1630 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman
IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. V. Sahani, N. Rastogi, A. C. Greenfield, S. P. Kalva, D. Ko, S. Saini, G. Harris, and P. R. Mueller
Multi-Detector Row CT in Evaluation of 94 Living Renal Donors by Readers with Varied Experience
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 905 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kawamoto, L. P. Lawler, and E. K. Fishman
Evaluation of the Renal Venous System on Late Arterial and Venous Phase Images with MDCT Angiography in Potential Living Laparoscopic Renal Donors
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. K. Kim, J. H. Kim, S.-J. Bae, and K.-S. Cho
CT Angiography for Evaluation of Living Renal Donors: Comparison of Four Reconstruction Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 471 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2293021098v1
229/3/869    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE