Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 29, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2302020761
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2302020761v1
230/2/389    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by François, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by François, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J. P.
(Radiology 2004;230:389-395.)
© RSNA, 2003


Experimental Studies

Left Ventricular Mass: Manual and Automatic Segmentation of True FISP and FLASH Cine MR Images in Dogs and Pigs1

Christopher J. François, MD, David S. Fieno, PhD, Stephanie M. Shors, MD and J. Paul Finn, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill. Received June 24, 2002; revision requested August 28; final revision received May 14, 2003; accepted June 18. Address correspondence to D.S.F. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, S. Mark Taper Imaging Center, Rm 1258, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048 (e-mail: David.Fieno@eshs.org).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of manually and automatically segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) and fast low-angle shot (FLASH) cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the determination of left ventricular (LV) mass.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine dogs and five pigs underwent cine MR imaging of the entire LV from base to apex. Manual and automatic segmentation times were recorded, and LV masses determined with each were compared with each other and with the true LV mass at autopsy. Estimated mass and true mass at autopsy were compared by calculating the correlation coefficient and the mean difference between the two for each MR sequence and segmentation method.

RESULTS: True LV mass at autopsy correlated well with masses determined with manual and automatic contours on true FISP MR images. Mean differences between true LV mass and masses determined from manual contours on true FISP and FLASH images were -0.8 g ± 2.6 and 3.7 g ± 6.8, respectively. When manually drawn end-diastolic contours were automatically propagated to end systole, mean differences were 2.0 g ± 3.6 (P = .05) and 9.1 g ± 6.5 (P < .05) for true FISP and FLASH images, respectively. For automatic contours, mean differences were 10.6 g ± 8.5 (P < .05) and 27.7 g ± 13.4 (P < .05) for true FISP and FLASH images, respectively. Mean automatic segmentation time was six times less than mean manual segmentation time.

CONCLUSION: LV mass was determined most accurately by using manual contours on true FISP images. In these animal models, fully automatic segmentation of true FISP images was performed in one-sixth of the time of manual segmentation and yielded LV masses with a mean error of approximately 5% of true LV mass.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Animals • Experimental study • Heart, MR, 524.12142 • Heart, ventricles • Magnetic resonance (MR), cine study, 524.12142


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Left ventricular (LV) mass is an important independent variable used in the care of patients with heart disease (1,2). LV mass has been shown to be a stronger predictor of cardiovascular death than patient age or sex, cholesterol level, or blood pressure (2). Furthermore, patients with LV hypertrophy are at a greater risk of nonfatal cardiovascular events compared with patients without LV hypertrophy (2).

Echocardiography is routinely used to determine LV mass noninvasively (14). However, image quality and assumptions regarding LV geometry limit the accuracy of this method for estimation of LV mass. Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides a method of calculating LV mass accurately (512) and reproducibly (7,1117). One limitation of using MR imaging routinely for this purpose is the postprocessing time required to compute the LV mass manually on the basis of raw image data.

To decrease the amount of labor required to process the MR images, several semiautomatic and automatic segmentation routines have been developed (10,12,1820). The utility of an image processing tool used for calculation of LV mass is dependent on its ability to allow accurate computation of LV mass and detection of changes in LV mass over time (17). However, few studies have been conducted to compare the LV mass determined from automatic segmentation of MR images with true values determined at autopsy (10,12). In addition, the robustness of such an automatic segmentation routine has not been evaluated rigorously for modern fast MR imaging sequences, such as recent applications of steady-state free precession to cardiac imaging (21). By using these newer imaging techniques, high-quality cine MR images of the heart may be acquired with relatively short imaging times (21) and may permit accurate distinction between myocardium and blood.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Studies were conducted in nine dogs (three females, six males) weighing 15.0–25.0 kg and five pigs (all females) weighing 17.3–29.5 kg by using procedures and protocols approved by the institutional animal care and use committee.

MR Imaging and LV Specimens
Animals were anesthetized with sodium brevital (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Ind), intubated, and ventilated mechanically with 2 L of oxygen per minute with 1%–3% isoflurane (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill). Animals were imaged in the right lateral decubitus position by using a 1.5-T whole-body MR imager (Sonata; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). A 14 x 28-cm flexible surface coil was positioned directly over the heart. Electrocardiographically gated cine MR images encompassing the entire LV were acquired during repeated breath holding, which was achieved by turning off the ventilator temporarily, allowing time in between for reoxygenation and reestablishment of an end tidal CO2 of approximately 35 mm Hg.

Contiguous 5-mm short-axis true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) and fast low-angle shot (FLASH) cine MR images (13–15 sections per examination) were acquired from base to apex. Typical imaging parameters were repetition time msec/echo time msec of 3.0/1.6 with a 70° flip angle for the true FISP sequence and 8.0/4.0 with a 20° flip angle for the FLASH sequence. The mean field of view was 300 x 290 mm and was adjusted depending on the size of the animal. A rectangular matrix was used to reduce acquisition time. The readout matrix was always 256, while the phase-encoding matrix depended on the rectangular field of view. Mean pixel size was 1.17 x 1.17 mm (range, 1.05 x 1.05–1.41 x 1.41 mm). No section spacing was used.

After MR imaging, the animals were sacrificed, the heart was excised, and the LV was isolated by one author (D.S.F.) as described previously (22). The mitral and aortic valves were removed, and the right ventricle was trimmed off of the interventricular septum at the anterior and inferior insertions. The heart was weighed by using a digital scale, and the amount of water displaced was measured in a graduated cylinder and recorded. The mass was then verified by multiplying the experimentally determined LV volume by the density of myocardium (1.05 g/mL).

MR Image Analysis
All image data sets were analyzed by one trained observer (C.J.F.), who was blinded to postmortem results. Commercially available software (ARGUS A1.5; Siemens Medical Systems) was used for histogram-based thresholding, active contouring, and shape matching (23). Separate algorithms optimized for true FISP and FLASH MR imaging were used to analyze true FISP and FLASH images, respectively. End diastole was defined as the first phase of images acquired after the R wave of the electrocardiographic signal, and end systole was the phase with the smallest LV blood pool area at the level of the midventricle, typically about one-third of the way into the cardiac cycle. Although determination of the myocardial borders, level of the base, and section location of the LV apex can be somewhat subjective, a standardized protocol described previously (22) was followed for determination of LV margins. The short-axis base and apex were determined by ascertaining their location on long-axis MR images (22,24). Images were cropped and zoomed to maximize the size of the LV in the viewing area. First, endo- and epicardial borders were contoured manually at end diastole and end systole from base to apex. The endocardial contours were drawn to include the papillary muscles in the LV mass and to lie on the edge of the myocardium, not within the blood pool. These manually drawn contours were used to determine the LV mass based on manual segmentation.

After manual contouring, the end diastolic contours that were drawn manually were automatically propagated to end systole to generate semiautomatic contours. The value of LV mass determined from only the generated end systolic contours was defined as the semiautomatic segmentation.

Finally, automatic end diastolic and end systolic contours were generated by using autosegmentation routines optimized for FLASH and true FISP MR sequences. After selecting the LV base and apex, the automatic end diastolic contours were computed by placing circular endo- and epicardial seed contours on a midventricular image below the level of the papillary muscles. The "autofit" function was used to fit the seed contours to the LV. These fitted endo- and epicardial contours were propagated to the other images in end diastole and end systole. It should be noted that none of the semiautomatically or automatically propagated contours were adjusted. Figures 13 illustrate our procedure for contouring.



View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Short-axis true FISP (3.0/1.6, 70° flip angle) and FLASH (8.0/4.0, 20° flip angle) end diastolic MR images with manual (row A) and automatic (row B) contours.

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Short-axis true FISP (3.0/1.6, 70° flip angle) and FLASH (8.0/4.0, 20° flip angle) end systolic MR images with manual (row A), semiautomatic (row B), and automatic (row C) contours.

 


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Short-axis true FISP (3.0/1.6, 70° flip angle) end diastolic MR images. A, Image without contours. B, Image with circular seed contours before autofit was performed. C, Image after autofit was performed. These seed contours were propagated throughout end diastole and then to end systole to generate the automatic contours.

 
The mean LV myocardial mass calculated for end diastole and end systole was recorded for each contouring method by summing the myocardial volume and multiplying it by 1.05 g/mL. The time required to draw endocardial and epicardial borders was noted. In addition, the papillary muscles and LV base and apex were contoured separately on the true FISP images, and their contribution to total LV mass was determined.

Statistics
On the basis of the results of a previous study (12) on the comparison of LV mass determined by using automatic segmentation with LV mass determined at autopsy in dogs, we calculated the sample size (n = 12) to detect an expected difference of 5 g with the Student t test for a significance level of .05 and a power of .8. MR imaging–derived LV mass values were compared with the actual LV mass values (range, 46.8–103.9 g) by using two-tailed paired Student t tests. Results are reported as mean ± SD. A P value less than .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. In addition, linear regression analysis was used to correlate the values of LV mass determined by using MR imaging with those determined at autopsy. Bland-Altman plots (25) were used to analyze the differences between the calculated LV masses and those determined at autopsy. While the data from the dogs and pigs were initially analyzed separately, the data were combined in the final analysis to evaluate the accuracy of the autosegmentation program over a wider range of LV mass values.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Endo- and epicardial borders were traced on 304 short-axis MR images. The mean time to place the contours on one image manually was 25.4 seconds (50.8 seconds to contour end diastolic and end systolic images in one section), while the mean time for automatic segmentation in end diastole was 5.7 seconds per image and for propagation to end systole was 2.9 seconds per image (8.6 seconds to contour end diastolic and end systolic images in one section).

The LV masses determined with MR imaging and the true values determined at autopsy are summarized in Table 1. The mean LV mass at autopsy was 67.8 g ± 17.5 (range, 46.8–103.9 g). The mean LV masses determined from true FISP images by using manual, semiautomatic, and automatic segmentation, respectively, were 67.0 g ± 18.7 (range, 44.6–103.1 g), 69.8 g ± 19.4 (range, 44.8–107.5 g), and 72.0 g ± 20.9 (range, 40.8–109.4 g). The mean LV masses determined from FLASH images by using manual, semiautomatic, and automatic segmentation, respectively, were 71.5 g ± 20.1 (range, 42.3–103.3 g), 76.9 g ± 20.8 (range, 49.9–112.6 g), and 88.8 g ± 27.1 (range, 56.6–148.0 g). A very strong correlation (r > 0.9) was found between LV mass determined with all MR segmentation methods and true LV mass (Fig 4). In fact, there was no statistically significant difference between the mean LV mass computed from manual contours and the true LV mass for both true FISP and FLASH MR images. However, the difference between the values of LV mass determined with MR images was statistically significant (P < .05) compared with the true masses when semiautomatic and automatic methods were used. LV mass values obtained from true FISP images were significantly less than values determined from FLASH images (P < .05), as shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. LV Mass Data

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. Graphs show correlation of LV mass determined by using MR imaging with true LV mass measured at autopsy. Manual, semiautomatic, and automatic contours of (a) true FISP images demonstrate close correlation with true LV mass. While there was close correlation between manual contours and true LV mass for (b) FLASH images, semiautomatic and automatic contours caused overestimation of the true LV mass.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. Graphs show correlation of LV mass determined by using MR imaging with true LV mass measured at autopsy. Manual, semiautomatic, and automatic contours of (a) true FISP images demonstrate close correlation with true LV mass. While there was close correlation between manual contours and true LV mass for (b) FLASH images, semiautomatic and automatic contours caused overestimation of the true LV mass.

 
The systematic and random differences between the true LV mass and the mass calculated on MR images for the combined dog and pig data are presented in the Bland-Altman graphs shown in Figure 5 and are summarized in Table 2. The mean difference between the true LV mass and the mass calculated from true FISP MR images by using manual, semiautomatic, and automatic segmentation was -1.7% (P = .27), 2.5% (P = .05), and 5.6% (P < .05) of true LV mass, respectively. For FLASH images, the mean difference was 5.1% (P = .06), 13.3% (P < .05), and 30.0% (P < .05) of true LV mass for manual, semiautomatic, and automatic contours, respectively. The mean difference between the true LV mass in dogs and mass calculated from MR images by using manual, semiautomatic, and automatic segmentation was 0.7%, 4.6%, and 8.7% of true LV mass, respectively, for true FISP and 9.4%, 16.4%, and 32.7% of true LV mass, respectively, for FLASH imaging. The mean difference between the true LV mass in pigs and mass calculated from MR images by using manual, semiautomatic, and automatic segmentation was -5.9%, 1.3%, and 0.2% of true LV mass, respectively, for true FISP and 2.8%, 7.6%, and 25.1% of true LV mass, respectively, for FLASH imaging.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5a. Bland-Altman plots show comparison of actual LV mass measured at autopsy to mass calculated from manual (a) true FISP and (b) FLASH imaging contours, semiautomatic (c) true FISP and (d) FLASH imaging contours, and automatic (e) true FISP and (f) FLASH contours. The mean difference between LV mass determined from true FISP images was less than that from FLASH images. The mean difference for true FISP automatic contours (e) is similar to that of FLASH manual contours (b).

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5b. Bland-Altman plots show comparison of actual LV mass measured at autopsy to mass calculated from manual (a) true FISP and (b) FLASH imaging contours, semiautomatic (c) true FISP and (d) FLASH imaging contours, and automatic (e) true FISP and (f) FLASH contours. The mean difference between LV mass determined from true FISP images was less than that from FLASH images. The mean difference for true FISP automatic contours (e) is similar to that of FLASH manual contours (b).

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5c. Bland-Altman plots show comparison of actual LV mass measured at autopsy to mass calculated from manual (a) true FISP and (b) FLASH imaging contours, semiautomatic (c) true FISP and (d) FLASH imaging contours, and automatic (e) true FISP and (f) FLASH contours. The mean difference between LV mass determined from true FISP images was less than that from FLASH images. The mean difference for true FISP automatic contours (e) is similar to that of FLASH manual contours (b).

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5d. Bland-Altman plots show comparison of actual LV mass measured at autopsy to mass calculated from manual (a) true FISP and (b) FLASH imaging contours, semiautomatic (c) true FISP and (d) FLASH imaging contours, and automatic (e) true FISP and (f) FLASH contours. The mean difference between LV mass determined from true FISP images was less than that from FLASH images. The mean difference for true FISP automatic contours (e) is similar to that of FLASH manual contours (b).

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5e. Bland-Altman plots show comparison of actual LV mass measured at autopsy to mass calculated from manual (a) true FISP and (b) FLASH imaging contours, semiautomatic (c) true FISP and (d) FLASH imaging contours, and automatic (e) true FISP and (f) FLASH contours. The mean difference between LV mass determined from true FISP images was less than that from FLASH images. The mean difference for true FISP automatic contours (e) is similar to that of FLASH manual contours (b).

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5f. Bland-Altman plots show comparison of actual LV mass measured at autopsy to mass calculated from manual (a) true FISP and (b) FLASH imaging contours, semiautomatic (c) true FISP and (d) FLASH imaging contours, and automatic (e) true FISP and (f) FLASH contours. The mean difference between LV mass determined from true FISP images was less than that from FLASH images. The mean difference for true FISP automatic contours (e) is similar to that of FLASH manual contours (b).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Summary of Systematic and Random Differences between True LV Mass and Mass Estimated with MR Imaging

 
Figures 6 and 7 show manual and automatic contours of true FISP images at the LV base and apex. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean mass of the base when determined by using automatic or manual segmentation (5.0 g vs 4.9 g, respectively; P = .88). However, the mass of the apex was significantly larger when calculated from automatic contours compared with manual contours (4.6 g vs 1.6 g, respectively; P < .05). The papillary muscles accounted for 6.0% ± 1.8 (7.0% in dogs and 4.2% in pigs) of total LV mass. If the LV mass was calculated by excluding the papillary muscles from the myocardium, the mean difference was -5.0 g ± 1.8 (7.7% less than the true LV mass) for all animals.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Short-axis true FISP (3.0/1.6, 70° flip angle) end diastolic MR images of the LV base. A, Manual segmentation. B, Automatic segmentation.

 


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7. Short-axis true FISP (3.0/1.6, 70° flip angle) end diastolic MR images of the LV apex. A, Manual segmentation. B, Automatic segmentation.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The results of this study demonstrate that, by using an MR sequence such as true FISP with inherently high signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (21) to acquire cardiac cine MR images, LV mass can be estimated accurately by drawing the endo- and epicardial LV borders manually. However, this came at the expense of time necessary to draw the contours. By using a commercially available segmentation software package, true FISP cine MR images were segmented automatically in one-sixth of the time of manual segmentation and provided estimates of LV mass that were, on average, 5% greater than the true LV mass.

As in the study of Barkhausen et al (20), estimates of LV mass from automatically drawn contours on true FISP images were more accurate than those on FLASH images when compared with manually drawn contours. The automatically propagated epicardial contours of the true FISP images tended to be more accurate than those of the FLASH images. This may be a result of the greater distinction between myocardium and right ventricular blood pool seen at the LV septum and between LV free wall and surrounding tissue when using the true FISP sequence. Because contrast between myocardium and blood pool in FLASH imaging is in part dependent on blood flow, there are fluctuations in contrast throughout the cardiac cycle as a result of changes in blood flow velocity (21). In true FISP imaging, such fluctuations in contrast are not seen because in-flow effects are minimized with a short echo time (21).

Because of the influence of through-plane motion on the position of the base (24), occasionally a basal MR image will be acquired that shows an interrupted myocardial border. In our study, we found that this did not lead to large errors in estimation of the mass of the most basal section with automatic segmentation.

Despite the fact that the automatic contours were similar to the manual contours at the base and the contribution of the papillary muscles was ignored, values for total LV mass were larger than the actual mass values. As shown in Figure 7, we believe the greatest source of error is secondary to overestimation of the size of the LV myocardium near the apex. For the most apical section, especially during end systole when there is thickening of the myocardial wall, there is often a section through myocardium with no blood pool visible. Baldy et al (18) described similar difficulties with automatic segmentation at the apex. Because the greatest errors in segmentation occurred at the most apical sections, a compromise between the accuracy of manual segmentation and speed of automatic segmentation might be to automatically propagate contours to all sections except the apex and then draw the contours manually for the most apical section. In studies where the base was not completely circumferential, the automatic segmentation program would include portions of the mitral valve or right atrium in the LV, causing a small overestimation in LV mass.

In humans, the transition from left atrium to LV is not as smooth as that in dogs and pigs, which may cause further problems for the automatic segmentation program. Although the present study did not address this issue in human subjects, one option for dealing with this potential problem would be to draw contours manually at the base and the apex, and then automatically propagate contours through the rest of the LV. Also, automatically drawn endocardial contours were smaller and epicardial contours larger than manually drawn contours, which caused overestimation of myocardial volume. These errors in endo- and epicardial contours were even greater for FLASH images, an observation also noted by Moon et al (26).

In the current study, the most accurate estimates of LV mass in these animal models were obtained when the papillary muscles were included in the myocardium and excluded from the LV blood pool. When the papillary muscles were excluded from the LV mass, the values were significantly lower than the true mass measured at autopsy. While our study did not include any human volunteers, authors in previous cardiac MR imaging studies of humans have described similar findings. van der Geest et al (19) found that papillary muscles accounted for 6.5% of end diastole volume, and Yamaoka et al (16) determined that they accounted for 6.7% of LV mass. In contrast to our findings, Young et al (12) found that exclusion of the papillary muscles from the LV mass in dogs resulted in a very small difference (0.3 g) in LV mass calculated with their three-dimensional model. However, the animals in their study were examined several months after rupture of the chordae tendonae, which would be expected to cause atrophy of the papillary muscles.

Previous autopsy studies have shown that human papillary muscles are normally the same thickness as the LV free wall or septum (27,28). Furthermore, there is proportional hypertrophy of the papillary muscles in patients with LV hypertrophy (27). Therefore, we believe it would be important for the papillary muscles to be routinely included in the LV mass and excluded from the LV blood in human studies, as well.

A limitation of this study is that we only evaluated animal models, while the automatic segmentation routine used in this study was designed for humans. The structure of the papillary muscles in humans is highly variable (27,28) and is characterized by many more trabeculations, which may increase the amount of time required for placing contours manually. Depending on the spacing between the trabeculations, the automatic segmentation program may place the endocardial border at the tip or base of the trabeculations. This would be expected to cause an underestimation of LV mass or overestimation of LV volume, respectively.

When compared with FLASH imaging, true FISP cine MR imaging of the heart provides excellent distinction of all parts of the LV, including the base, apex, epicardium, and papillary muscles throughout the cardiac cycle. By using a commercially available segmentation software package, true FISP cine MR images were segmented automatically in one-sixth the time required for manual segmentation and provided estimates of LV mass that were, on average, 5% greater than the true LV mass.

Practical application: While cardiac MR imaging provides accurate estimates of LV mass, its widespread clinical use in patients with heart disease is somewhat limited because of the time-consuming process of drawing the myocardial borders manually. Automatic segmentation programs have been developed but have not been evaluated rigorously, with comparisons made between estimated LV mass and actual LV mass measured at autopsy. This study demonstrated that accurate estimates of LV mass can be obtained with either FLASH or true FISP MR imaging by using manual segmentation. When an automatic segmentation routine is used to evaluate LV mass, however, FLASH images caused overestimation of LV mass by 30%, while values obtained with true FISP images were, on average, 5.6% greater than the true LV mass.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: FISP = fast imaging with steady-state precession, FLASH = fast low-angle shot, LV = left ventricle

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, J.P.F.; study concepts, C.J.F., D.S.F., S.M.S.; study design, D.S.F., C.J.F.; literature research, C.J.F., D.S.F., S.M.S.; experimental studies, D.S.F.; data acquisition, D.S.F., C.J.F.; data analysis/interpretation, C.J.F., D.S.F., S.M.S.; statistical analysis, C.J.F.; manuscript preparation, definition of intellectual content, and editing, all authors; manuscript revision/review, J.P.F., D.S.F.; manuscript final version approval, C.J.F.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Levy D, Garrison R, Savage D, Kannel W, Castelli W. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1561-1566.[Abstract]
  2. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, Savage DD, Laragh JH. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:345-352.
  3. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55:613-619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gopal A, Schnellbaecher M, Shen Z, Akinboboye O, Sapin P, King D. Freehand three-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular mass: in vivo anatomic validation using explanted human hearts. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:802-810.[Abstract]
  5. Keller AM, Peshock RM, Malloy CR, et al. In vivo measurement of myocardial mass using nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8:113-117.[Abstract]
  6. Caputo GR, Tscholakoff D, Sechtem U, Higgins CB. Measurement of canine left ventricular mass by using MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148:33-38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Katz J, Milliken MC, Stray-Gundersen J, et al. Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 169:495-498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Shapiro EP, Rogers WJ, Beyar R, et al. Determination of left ventricular mass by magnetic resonance imaging in hearts deformed by acute infarction. Circulation 1989; 79:706-711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. McDonald KM, Parrish T, Wennberg P, et al. Rapid, accurate and simultaneous noninvasive assessment of right and left ventricular mass with nuclear magnetic resonance imaging using the snapshot gradient method. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19:1601-1607.[Abstract]
  10. Furber A, Balzer P, Cavaro-Ménard C, et al. Experimental validation of an automated edge-detection method for a simultaneous determination of the endocardial and epicardial borders in short-axis cardiac MR images: application in normal volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:1006-1014.[Medline]
  11. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, Klein SS, Graham TP. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999; 1:7-21.[Medline]
  12. Young AA, Cowan BR, Thrupp SF, Hedley SJ, Dell’Italia LJ. Left ventricular mass and volume: fast calculation with guide-point modeling on MR images. Radiology 2000; 216:597-602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, van der Velde EA, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology 1993; 187:261-268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Buser PT, Auffermann W, Holt WW, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of global left ventricular function with use of cine nuclear magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:1294-1300.[Abstract]
  15. Semelka R, Tomei E, Wagner S, et al. Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174:763-768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yamaoka O, Yabe T, Okada M, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular mass: comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast left ventriculography. Am Heart J 1993; 126:1372-1379.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Bellenger NG, Davies LC, Francis JM, Coats AJS, Pennell DJ. Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000; 2:271-278.[Medline]
  18. Baldy C, Douek P, Croisille P, Magnin IE, Revel D, Amiel M. Automated myocardial edge detection from breath-hold cine-MR images: evaluation of left ventricular volumes and mass. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12:589-598.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. van der Geest RJ, Buller VG, Jansen E, et al. Comparison between manual and semiautomated analysis of left ventricular volume parameters from short-axis MR images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:756-765.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging—feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:264-269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li D, Pereles S, Finn JP. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 2001; 219:828-834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Fieno DS, Jaffe WC, Simonetti OP, Judd RM, Finn JP. TrueFISP: assessment of accuracy for measurement of left ventricular mass in an animal model. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:526-531.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Jolly MP. Combining edge, region, and shape information to segment the left ventricle in cardiac MR images Utrecht, the Netherlands: Proc Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2001; 482-490.
  24. Marcus JT, Gotte MJ, DeWaal LK, et al. The influence of through-plane motion on left ventricular volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for image acquisition and analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999; 1:1-6.[Medline]
  25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ. Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 2002; 223:789-797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Estes EH, Dalton FM, Entman ML, Dixon HB, Hackel DB. The anatomy and blood supply of the papillary muscles of the left ventricle. Am Heart J 1966; 71:356-362.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Roberts WC, Cohen LS. Left ventricular papillary muscles: description of the normal and a survey of conditions causing them to be abnormal. Circulation 1972; 46:138-154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. P. Finn, K. Nael, V. Deshpande, O. Ratib, and G. Laub
Cardiac MR Imaging: State of the Technology.
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 338 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. B. Mascarenhas, R. Muthupillai, B. Cheong, M. Pereyra, and S. D. Flamm
Fast 3D cine steady-state free precession imaging with sensitivity encoding for assessment of left ventricular function in a single breath-hold.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1235 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. J. M. van Geuns, T. Baks, E. H. B. M. Gronenschild, J.-P. M. M. Aben, P. A. Wielopolski, F. Cademartiri, and P. J. de Feyter
Automatic Quantitative Left Ventricular Analysis of Cine MR Images by Using Three-dimensional Information for Contour Detection.
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 215 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Rickers, N. M. Wilke, M. Jerosch-Herold, S. A. Casey, P. Panse, N. Panse, J. Weil, A. G. Zenovich, and B. J. Maron
Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 855 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Berg, V. L. Sorrell, K. B. Kern, R. W. Hilwig, M. I. Altbach, M. M. Hayes, K. A. Bates, and G. A. Ewy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Untreated Ventricular Fibrillation Reveals Prompt Right Ventricular Overdistention Without Left Ventricular Volume Loss
Circulation, March 8, 2005; 111(9): 1136 - 1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P Friberg, A Allansdotter-Johnsson, A Ambring, R Ahl, H Arheden, J Framme, A Johansson, D Holmgren, H Wahlander, and S Marild
Increased left ventricular mass in obese adolescents
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2004; 25(11): 987 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2302020761v1
230/2/389    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by François, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by François, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE