|
|
||||||||
Neuroradiology |
1 From the Second Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (C.J.C., H.L.H., Y.C.T., L.J.W., Y.C.W.), and Neurology (R.K.L., C.M.C., Y.C.H.), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, 199 Tung-Hwa North Rd, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; and Public Health and Biostatistics Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC (L.C.S.). Received January 1, 2003; revision requested March 6; final revision received August 3; accepted August 22. C.J.C. supported by National Science Council, Taiwan, grant NSC 892314-B-182A-086 and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, grant CMRP 1112. Address correspondence to C.J.C. (e-mail: radcjc@adm.cgmh.org.tw).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The neutral-position cervical MR images of 46 patients and 51 control subjects were evaluated for the following findings: localized lower cervical cord atrophy, asymmetric cord flattening, abnormal cervical curvature, loss of attachment (LOA) between the posterior dural sac and subjacent lamina, and noncompressed intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images. The difference in frequency of these findings between the control and patient groups was examined by means of the
2 test. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of these MR imaging findings in the diagnosis Hirayama disease were calculated. Multivariate analysis of these findings was also performed.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the frequency of these MR imaging findings between the control and patient groups (all comparisons, P
.002). Among the MR imaging findings, localized lower cervical cord atrophy, asymmetric cord flattening, and LOA had accuracy of more than 80% in identification of the disease. After multivariate analysis, LOA was the only significantly important predictor of the disease, with odds ratio of 716.7 (95% CI: 71.9, 7,145.2). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of LOA were 93.5%, 98.0%, 97.7%, 94.3%, and 95.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: LOA from posterior dural sac and subjacent lamina is the most valuable finding in the diagnosis of Hirayama disease at neutral-position MR imaging.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Muscles, diseases, 42.838, 43.838, 44.838 Spinal cord, diseases, 341.41, 341.49 Spinal cord, MR, 341.121411
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Flexion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can help differentiate Hirayama disease by depicting forward displacement of the posterior dural sac (8,10,1417). However, we have encountered some problems in our daily practice. First, the finding of dural shifting may be absent or subtle in patients with disease duration of longer than 10 years (15). Second, most of these patients may undergo only nonflexion cervical MR examinationbecause most clinicians are not familiar with this disorder and do not request a flexion cervical MR examination. Therefore, exploration of neutral-position MR imaging findings to aid the diagnosis seems important. In the literature, a few investigators have suggested some specific, but not yet validated, neutral-position MR imaging or computed tomographic (CT) findings of this disease (14,16,18). They include localized lower cervical cord atrophy, asymmetric cord flattening, noncompressed intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images, and abnormal cervical curvature (straight or kyphotic). Besides these findings, in our practice, we have noted a loss of attachment (LOA) between the posterior dural sac and subjacent lamina. Thus, the purpose of our study was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of various neutral-position MR imaging findings in the diagnosis of Hirayama flexion myelopathy.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The diagnostic criteria of Hirayama disease include the following: (a) chronic weakness and atrophy of the distal upper limb(s), (b) insidious onset in the 2nd or 3rd decade of life, and (c) absence of substantial sensory deficits, reflex abnormalities, and cranial nerve, pyramidal tract, lower limb, sphincter, or cerebellum involvement (4); no history of poliomyelitis, toxin exposure, or periodic paralysis; and no evidence of an underlying disease causing peripheral neuropathy of axonal motor type shown at biochemical and neurophysiologic work-up (5).
Control Subjects
The neutral-position cervical MR images of 51 control subjects (34 men and 17 women) were studied. These subjects were enrolled consecutively between August 2000 and February 2001, because their age was between 15 and 30 years (an age range similar to that of the patients with Hirayama disease) and they had no evidence of cervical surgery or congenital cervical abnormalities noted at cervical MR imaging. In addition to neutral-position MR imaging, flexion cervical MR imaging was performed in these control subjects. The latter study was approved by our institutional review board, and all of the control subjects gave written informed consent. The control subjects underwent cervical MR imaging to provide a diagnosis for posterior neck pain, weakness or numbness of hands, and gait disturbance; to screen for cerebrospinal seeding; or to rule out multiple sclerosis. Charts of these control subjects were reviewed by one neurologist (R.K.L.) and flexion cervical MR images were reviewed by one radiologist (C.J.C.) to ensure that none of the charts contained the clinical findings or flexion MR imaging evidence of Hirayama disease.
Imaging Protocol
The MR imagers were superconducting 1.5-T systems (Signa, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis; Vision, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The neutral-position MR protocol included transverse and sagittal T1-weighted (spin echo, repetition time msec/echo time msec of 500600/1520) and T2*-weighted (gradient-echo, 400500/1520, flip angle of 20°30°) MR imaging and sagittal T2-weighted MR imaging (fast spin echo, 3004,000/8599 [effective]). The flexion MR imaging protocol consisted of sagittal T1-weighted (500600/1520) and T2-weighted (4,000/8599, matrix size of 256 x 256) MR imaging and transverse T2*-weighted MR imaging (400500/1520, flip angle of 20°30°, matrix size of 256 x 192) with 40° neck flexion by using a custom-built positioning sponge. Two signals were acquired at T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, and four signals were acquired at T2*-weighted MR imaging. Section thickness was 4 mm with 1-mm gap for both sagittal and transverse MR imaging with all sequences.
Image Evaluation
Neutral-position cervical MR imaging findingsincluding localized lower cervical cord atrophy, asymmetric cord flattening, abnormal cervical curvature, LOA from posterior dural sac and subjacent lamina, and noncompressed intramedullary high signal intensitywere evaluated by two radiologists (L.J.W., Y.C.W.) independently as described later. Both radiologists were blinded to the patients history, clinical, and flexion MR imaging findings. Disagreements were resolved with subsequent consensus.
Localized lower cervical cord atrophy was evaluated on sagittal MR images and confirmed on transverse MR images. Lower cervical cord was defined as the cord between C4 and C7. Localized cord atrophy was defined as a decrease in cord size in comparison with the normal cord above and that below the affected level. Atrophy suggested on sagittal MR images was verified on appropriate contiguous transverse MR images, since it is possible to make an erroneous interpretation of atrophy on sagittal MR images if the spinal cord is not truly in the midline. On sagittal MR images, comparison of the suspected atrophy level with the cord below is more reliable than that with the cord above. Physiologically, the cervical cord starts to enlarge at C3, reaches its maximum at C5, and tapers thereafter to T2; thus, for a lower cervical cord lesion, a larger cord below the suspected atrophy confirms atrophy at the suspected level.
Asymmetric cord flattening was evaluated on transverse T2*-weighted MR images. To avoid confusion with cord compression due to adjacent spurs or herniated disks, cord flattening was defined as cord flattening without a narrowed or obliterated adjacent subarachnoid space. An elliptic spinal cord was considered normal, a pear-shaped spinal cord was considered asymmetric cord flattening, and a triangular spinal cord was considered symmetric cord flattening.
Cervical curvature was classified according to the principles suggested by Guigui et al (19) and Batzdorf and Batzdorff (20). Cervical curvature was measured according to the relationship of the dorsal aspect of the vertebral bodies C3 through C6 to a line drawn from the dorsocaudal aspect of the vertebral body C2 to the dorsocaudal aspect of the vertebral body C7 (Fig 1). By definition, normal lordotic cervical curvature is curvature in which no part of the dorsal aspect of the vertebral bodies C3 through C6 crosses the line from C2 through C7 (Fig 1, A). An abnormal (straight or kyphotic) curvature is curvature in which part or all of the dorsal aspects of the vertebral bodies C3 through C6 meet or cross through the line from C2 through C7 (Fig 1, B).
|
Noncompressed intramedullary high signal intensity was considered if a patent subarachnoid space and intramedullary high signal intensity were noted. Intramedullary high signal intensity associated with cord compression by adjacent spurs or herniated disks was assumed to be due to these local changes.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed with software (SPSS, version 10.0; SPSS, Chicago, Ill). The power for the current study was calculated retrospectively by means of the formula of Fleiss (21), with confidence level of 95%, 2% exposure rate for the control group, odds ratio of exposure in patients relative to that in control subjects of 100, ratio of the control group to patient group of 1:1, and sample size of 40 for both groups. The resultant power was 100%. Interobserver agreement for the neutral-position MR imaging findings was evaluated and expressed with the
statistic. Agreement was excellent with
> 0.80; good,
= 0.610.80; moderate,
= 0.410.60; fair,
= 0.210.40; and poor,
< 0.20. The independent t test was used to examine the difference between patients and control subjects with regard to age. The
2 test was used to examine the difference between patients and control subjects with regard to sex, abnormal cervical curvature, LOA between the posterior dural sac and subjacent lamina, localized lower cervical cord atrophy, asymmetric cord flattening, and noncompressed intramedullary high signal intensity. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of these neutral-position MR imaging findings in the diagnosis of Hirayama disease were also calculated. Multiple logistic regressions with forward selection were made to include important predictors of the disease. Differences with a P value of less than .05 were considered to be statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
values of interobserver agreement for localized lower cervical cord atrophy, asymmetric cord flattening, LOA between the posterior dural sac and subjacent lamina, cervical curvature, and noncompressed intramedullary high signal intensity were 0.897, 0.881, 0.958, 0.932, and 1.000, respectively. Seventy percent (32 of 46) of the patient group and 0% (zero of 51) of the control group had evidence of asymmetric cord flattening (Figs 24). The difference between the groups was significant (P < .001). Fifty-nine percent (27 of 46) of the patient group and 0% (zero of 51) of the control group had localized lower cervical cord atrophy on neutral-position cervical MR images (Figs 3, 4). The difference between groups was significant (P < .001). Ninety-three percent (43 of 46) of the patient group and 2% (one of 51) of the control group had LOA between the posterior dural sac and subjacent lamina (Figs 24). The difference between groups was significant (P < .001). Eighty-three percent (38 of 46) of the patient group and 53% (27 of 51) of the control group had abnormal (straight or kyphotic) cervical curvature (Fig 1). The difference between groups was significant (P = .002). Twenty-eight percent (13 of 46) of the patient group and 4% (two of 51) of the control group had noncompressed intramedullary high signal intensity (Figs 3, 4). The difference between groups was significant (P = .001) (Table 1).
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pathogenic mechanism of Hirayama disease is still unknown. An assumption of imbalanced growth between the patients vertebral column and spinal canal contents has been suggested (6,9,1112). This imbalanced growth will cause disproportional length between the patients vertebral column and the spinal canal contents, which will cause a "tight dural sac" or "overstretch of the cord" in the neutral position and an anteriorly displaced posterior dural wall when the neck is flexed. Toma and Shiozawa (12) also suspected that the different growth rates between male and female patients might be related to the male preponderance of Hirayama disease.
The relationship between these MR imaging findings and the disproportional phenomenon may be explained as follows. In a normal spine, the spinal dura mater is a loose sheath that is anchored in the vertebral canal by the nerve roots and by its attachment to the periosteum in two places: one at the foramen magnum and the dorsal surfaces of C2 and C3 and the other at the coccyx (22). The remainder of the dura mater is only suspended and cushioned in the spinal canal by the epidural fat, venous plexuses, and loose connective tissues (22). In the neutral position, the dura mater of the cervical spine is slack (23). With neck flexion, the dura mater becomes tighter because the length of the cervical canal increases as the neck moves from extension to flexion. The difference in length between extension and flexion from T1 to the top of the atlas is 1.5 cm at the anterior wall and 5 cm at the posterior wall (23).
Normally, the slack of the dura mater can compensate for the increased length in flexion; therefore, although it becomes tightened, the dura mater can still be in close contact with the walls of the spinal canal without displacement. In patients with Hirayama disease, however, the dura mater is no longer slack but is tight in a neutral position. The tight dural sac, therefore, can result in separation of the posterior dural sac and its subjacent lamina or various degrees of abnormal cervical curvature (straight or kyphotic) according to the strength of the tension. The occurrence of dural separation is more likely than abnormal cervical curvature because the dura mater is only suspended in the spinal canal below C3 and can be easily separated when the dural sac becomes tighter. On neck flexion, the tight dural sac cannot compensate for the increased length of the posterior wall, which causes anterior shifting of the posterior dural wall and consequent compression of the cord. This compression may cause microcirculatory disturbances in the territory of the anterior spinal artery at the site of the most kyphotic level (usually C4 through C6) (1,4). The chronic circulatory disturbance resulting from repeated or sustained flexion of the neck may produce localized cord atrophy at the lower cervical region. Sometimes, intramedullary high signal intensity may be seen because of more severe ischemic change or gliosis at the vulnerable areas (17), but its incidence is lower than that of localized lower cervical cord atrophy.
Although the disproportional theory may explain most of the neutral-position MR imaging findings of Hirayama disease, the asymmetric cord flattening cannot be explained well with this theory. Seventy percent (32 of 46) of the patients in our study and 68% (39 of 57) of the patients in the study of Hirayama and Tokumaru (15) had asymmetric cord flattening at MR imaging or CT myelography. This finding indicates that there is another predisposing factor. A "posterior epidural ligament factor" has been proposed by Shinomiya et al (24). Anatomically, there are two kinds of posterior epidural ligaments between the posterior dura mater and the ligamentum flavum. One kind consists of fine elastic ligaments, whereas the other consists of large ligaments (approximately 13 mm in diameter). These ligaments have a tendency to be abundant at C1 through C2, decreased below C2, and sparse at C6 and C7 (25). It has been assumed that these ligaments may contribute to resistance against the separation of the posterior dura mater from the ligamentum flavum. Abnormally unequal distribution or lack of these ligaments may be the essential cause of asymmetric cord compression.
There were some limitations of this study. First, old and new MR imagers were used in this study, and their imaging qualities were somewhat different. The differences in old and new MR images may have affected the readers and thus introduced bias. Second, even though we tried to ensure that none of the control subjects had the clinical or flexion MR evidence of Hirayama disease at the time of imaging, we cannot completely rule out the presence of Hirayama disease at a very early stage. This condition would only trivially change the results of this study.
In conclusion, we found that LOA between the posterior dural sac and subjacent lamina is the most valuable imaging feature in the identification of Hirayama disease at neutral-position MR imaging. Thus, in patients with adolescent onset of distal upper limb weakness, the LOA sign on neutral-position MR images should raise suspicion for Hirayama disease. An additional flexion MR imaging study or detailed clinical evaluation to confirm this diagnosis can provide further confirmation.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, C.J.C.; study concepts, C.J.C., H.L.H., R.K.L.; study design, C.J.C., H.L.H., Y.C.T., R.K.L.; literature research, C.J.C., H.L.H.; clinical studies, R.K.L., Y.C.H., C.M.C.; data acquisition, H.L.H., Y.C.T., L.J.W., Y.C.W.; data analysis/interpretation, C.J.C., H.L.H., R.K.L., C.M.C.; statistical analysis, C.J.C., H.L.H., L.C.S.; manuscript preparation, C.J.C., H.L.H., Y.C.T.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, C.J.C.; manuscript editing, C.J.C., H.L.H.; manuscript revision/review and final version approval, C.J.C., H.L.H., R.K.L.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |