Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2313030683
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saeed, M.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saeed, M.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.
(Radiology 2004;231:689-696.)
© RSNA, 2004


Experimental Studies

Transendocardial Delivery of Extracellular Myocardial Markers by Using Combination X-ray/MR Fluoroscopic Guidance: Feasibility Study in Dogs1

Maythem Saeed, DVM, PhD, Randall Lee, MD, PhD, Alastair Martin, PhD, Oliver Weber, PhD, Gabriele A. Krombach, MD, Simon Schalla, MD, Michael Lee, David Saloner, PhD and Charles B. Higgins, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.S., A.M., O.W., G.A.K., S.S., D.S., C.B.H.) and Medicine (R.L.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands (A.M.); and Bioheart, Santa Rosa, Calif (M.L.). From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 28, 2003; revision requested July 10; revision received August 21; accepted October 8. Address correspondence to M.S. (e-mail: maythem.saeed@radiology.ucsf.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of using a combination of x-ray fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance (MR) fluoroscopic (ie, x-ray/MR fluoroscopy) guidance for left ventricular (LV) catheterization and transendocardial delivery of extracellular tissue markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were performed in six dogs by using an x-ray/MR fluoroscopy system. The arterial guide wire and catheter were advanced into the heart with x-ray fluoroscopic guidance. The dogs were injected with 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL of iohexol. For passive catheter tracking, a steady-state free precession MR imaging sequence was used. A steerable dual-lumen catheter was used to transendocardially inject a mixture of gadodiamide (0.05 mol/L) plus Evans blue dye (3%). An electrocardiographically gated dual-inversion-recovery MR imaging sequence was used to visualize the myocardial delivery of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture. A high concentration of gadodiamide (0.5 mol/L) was used to demarcate the borders of the area of interest, or "hit the target." Blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were measured before and after the intervention. Analysis of variance, Scheffé, and paired Student t tests were used for data analysis.

RESULTS: LV catheterization via arterial access was feasible with two-dimensional x-ray fluoroscopic and three-dimensional MR fluoroscopic guidance. Delivery of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture and the consequences of the procedure were monitored with MR imaging. Gadolinium-enhanced regions were bright on T1-weighted MR images, but they varied in size as a function of injectant volume. The mean sizes of these regions were 1.5% ± 0.6 of the LV after the 0.5-mL injection of the mixture and 7.0% ± 0.5 of the LV after the 2.0-mL injection (P < .001, Scheffé test). The corresponding mean sizes of the blue dye–enhanced regions were 2.3% ± 0.6 and 8.3% ± 0.4, respectively (P < .001). A high concentration of gadodiamide caused signal intensity loss around the gadolinium-enhanced regions.

CONCLUSION: Transendocardial delivery of potential therapeutic solutions is feasible with x-ray/MR fluoroscopic guidance. The injection catheter can be navigated with MR imaging guidance to hit the target.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Animals • Catheters and catheterization, 51.122, 51.1269 • Experimental study • Heart, interventional procedures, 51.122, 51.1269 • Magnetic resonance (MR), guidance, 51.121411, 51.121413, 51.121416, 51.12143, 51.12149


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Angiogenic growth factors and stem cell therapies have been used to stimulate the development of collateral vessels and to rebuild the myocardial tissue damaged in end-stage coronary artery disease (14). Angiogenic growth factors have been administered systemically (5), intrapericardially (2), and through the coronary arteries (6). Clinical study results have demonstrated that these routes of administration are not very efficient (7). Laham et al (8) found that after intracoronary delivery of fibroblast growth factor, less than 1% of the injectant was retained in the myocardium.

Intramyocardial delivery of therapeutic agents has been suggested (14) to accomplish the following: (a) the delivery of a high local concentration of the agent, (b) the delivery of the agent to pathologic regions only, and (c) minimization of the potential for systemic adverse effects, such as hypotension, accelerated atherosclerosis, or oncogenesis (9). Intramyocardial delivery of therapeutic agents has been accomplished with surgery (ie, minithoracotomy) or selective coronary arterial catheterization. More recently, percutaneous nonfluoroscopic electromechanical mapping technology (NOGA; Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, Calif) has been used to map the myocardial scar and thus demarcate the target for therapy delivery (1012). Real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging also has been used to monitor the delivery of therapeutic solutions to the myocardium and vascular wall (1315).

The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the feasibility of using a combination of x-ray fluoroscopic and MR fluoroscopic (ie, x-ray/MR fluoroscopy) guidance for left ventricular (LV) catheterization and transendocardial delivery of extracellular tissue markers. An additional goal was to determine whether this method is precise enough to enable the delivery of solution to a specified site (ie, target) in the myocardium in a simulation of delivery to a specific region of ischemic myocardial injury (ie, infarction or scar).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animal Preparation
The experimental animals were cared for in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines. The experimental protocol was approved by the committee on animal research of the University of California San Francisco. Six dogs weighing 20–25 kg were used in this feasibility study. Anesthesia was induced with an intravenous injection of 30 mg of sodium pentobarbital per kilogram of body weight. The animals were intubated and artificially ventilated (500 mL of air per stroke) at a constant rate of 20 strokes per minute. Four electrocardiographic patches were placed on the chest and connected to the electrocardiographic leads for continuous monitoring of the electrocardiographic waves.

After percutaneous catheterization of the femoral artery, the dog’s heart rate and blood pressure were continuously measured by using a pressure transducer (Gould, Cleveland, Ohio). Phasic and mean arterial blood pressures were recorded on a multichannel recorder (Gould). Oxygen saturation was continuously monitored by using an oxygen sensor placed on the tongue (3150 MRI; InVivo Research, Orlando, Fla).

Prototype Endovascular Catheter
The prototype endovascular catheter (which is not Food and Drug Administration approved) consists of steering and needle-adjusting components (scale, 1–7 mm) at one end and a nitinol needle (Bioheart, Santa Rosa, Calif) for puncturing the myocardial wall at the other end. The steering component controls the tip deflection, the needle depth adjustment, and the needle advancement. The handle allows rotation of the catheter tip in all directions inside the LV chamber for delivery of the injectant to any segment of the LV wall (Fig 1). The catheter has two lumina: one for injection and/or blood sampling and the other for pressure measurement. The delivery system is composed of a 9-F-long sheath, a 9-F dilator, and a 6-F catheter. Each injectant was delivered manually for 15–20 seconds. In the last two animals, we modified the same catheter slightly by coating it with gadolinium oxide powder (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, Mo). This small modification led to increased visibility of the tip and of the catheter shaft in the LV.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Prototype endovascular catheter used in current study. The handle controls tip deflection, needle depth adjustment, and needle advancement. A device on the handle enables one to adjust the needle length by 1-7 mm.

 
Contrast Material and Tissue Markers
Three contrast materials were used as tissue markers in the current study: 50% iohexol (15 mg of iodine per milliliter, Omnipaque; Amersham Health, Princeton, NJ), 10% gadodiamide (0.05 mol/L, Omniscan; Amersham Health), and 3% Evans blue dye (Sigma Chemical); these markers were visible at x-ray fluoroscopic, MR fluoroscopic, and postmortem examinations, respectively. The tissue markers were diluted with sterile saline solution to achieve the above concentrations. Iohexol at a concentration of 30 mg of iodine per milliliter was diluted with saline solution (1:1 ratio) and used to perform x-ray fluoroscopy so that this contrast agent could be visualized in the myocardium. This tissue marker was not mixed with Evans blue dye. Three volumes (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL) of the same diluted concentration of iohexol were administered to each of the six dogs.

A solution of gadodiamide diluted with saline solution (10:1 ratio) (10% of a 0.5 mol/L concentration equals a 0.05 mol/L concentration) plus 3% Evans blue dye was used to compare the distribution of marker at MR imaging with the distribution of marker at postmortem tissue examination. Three volumes of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL) were injected into the myocardium of each dog. The size of the gadolinium-enhanced region determined at three-dimensional MR imaging was compared with the distribution of blue dye in the myocardial tissue at postmortem tissue examination. All tissue markers were extracellular water-soluble agents with comparable molecular weights. The molecular weights of iohexol, gadodiamide, and Evans blue dye were 821.1, 573.6, and 960.8, respectively.

The Hybrid X-ray/MR Fluoroscopy System
A hybrid interventional x-ray/MR fluoroscopy system was used in the current study (Fig 2). This system consists of a short-bore MR imaging unit (Intera I/T; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) connected to a digital fluoroscopic catheterization laboratory (Integris V5000; Philips Medical Systems). A sliding door, which shields against radiofrequency energy or x rays, separates and permits combined or independent use of the two units. When this door is open, the two units are connected by a movable tabletop for rapid transport of the subject back and forth between the two units. Each experiment began with the subject in the catheterization laboratory; the animal was then moved to the MR imaging unit.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. The hybrid interventional x-ray/MR fluoroscopy system consists of a C-arm fluoroscopy system (arrow) combined with a short-bore MR imaging unit (arrowhead). The dual suite contains a digital fluoroscopic catheterization laboratory (Integris V5000) connected to a 1.5-T MR imaging unit (Intera I/T). A sliding door between the two systems shields against x-ray exposure or radiofrequency energy. The two units are connected by a movable tabletop, which enables rapid transport of the subject back and forth between the two units.

 
X-ray Fluoroscopy
After gaining femoral arterial access, the catheter was advanced into the abdominal aorta. The initial advancement of the guide wire and catheter into the LV chamber via the ascending aorta was performed with x-ray fluoroscopic guidance (by M.S. and M.L.). Digital subtraction images were acquired during and after the injection of iohexol. Each dog received 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL of iohexol. A total of 18 injections (ie, each of six dogs were injected with each of the three volumes) were administered transendocardially into three regions. We performed x-ray fluoroscopy in this study to compare two-dimensional fluoroscopic images with three-dimensional MR images for localization of the injectant and to compare MR images with fluoroscopic images for measuring the size of enhanced regions. The catheter was pulled back to the descending aorta before the animal was transferred to the MR imaging unit.

MR Fluoroscopy for Catheter Guidance
The animal was transferred to the MR imaging unit, without its position being changed, on the movable tabletop (Fig 2). The time to transport the animal between the two units was less than 3 minutes. A steady-state free precession MR imaging sequence and a dual-inversion-recovery T1-weighted contrast material–enhanced black blood MR imaging sequence were used for catheter guidance and for depiction of the myocardial enhancement caused by the injectant, respectively.

The advancement of the endovascular catheter from the descending aorta to the ascending aorta and then to the LV was monitored by using a steady-state free precession MR fluoroscopic sequence with the following parameters: 3.8/1.89 (repetition time msec/echo time msec), 60° flip angle, 5-mm section thickness, 200-mm field of view, 144 x 144 matrix, and 500-msec temporal resolution in continuous imaging. An 8-second breath hold per section was used for cine MR imaging.

A dual-inversion-recovery T1-weighted contrast-enhanced black blood MR imaging sequence was used to visualize the consequences of delivering the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture (16). The imaging parameters for this examination were 500 (every heart beat)/40, 5-mm section thickness, 200-mm field of view, 256 x 160 matrix, turbo spin-echo factor of 16, black blood double-inversion pulse, two signals acquired, and acquisition time of approximately 9 seconds per section (ie, breath hold). Cardiac horizontal long-axis and sagittal planes were used to locate the tip of the catheter and the gadolinium-enhanced regions.

The 0.5-, 1.0-, and 2.0-mL volumes of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture were injected into three LV regions in each dog (total of 18 injections administered in a total of six dogs). The sizes of the gadolinium-enhanced regions were measured by using the dual-inversion-recovery T1-weighted contrast-enhanced black blood MR images. To avoid perforation of the LV wall, a constant depth of 4 mm was chosen after the wall thickness was measured.

In two dogs the injection catheter was navigated by using real-time MR imaging to inject contrast agent into the borders of the area of interest, or "hit the target." In these animals, after the last 2.0-mL injection of the diluted gadodiamide (10:1 ratio), two injections of the high concentration of this agent (ie, 0.2 mL of 0.5 mol/L) were administered around the highly enhanced region to demonstrate the feasibility of the precise delivery of therapeutic agent. A high concentration of gadodiamide produces a T2* effect—that is, a signal intensity loss—in the myocardium. Two investigators (A.M., O.W.) acquired the MR images together in all animals.

Image Analysis
The sizes of the gadolinium-enhanced regions on MR images and of the blue dye–stained regions at postmortem examination were measured by using computer-assisted planimetry with the public domain NIH Image program (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md) (17). The borders separating the nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced myocardial regions and the borders separating the nonstained and blue dye–stained myocardial regions were manually outlined on the MR images and in the heart tissue at postmortem examination, respectively. The sizes of the gadolinium-enhanced regions on the MR images were compared with the sizes of the blue dye–stained regions on slices of the heart at postmortem examination. The gadolinium-enhanced and blue dye–stained regions were measured by consensus (by M.S. and G.A.K.).

Postmortem Examination
The animals were sacrificed by means of an intravenous injection of a lethal dose of pentobarbital sodium (10 mL of 200 mg/mL). The time interval between the last injection of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture and the excision of the heart was 5–10 minutes. To ensure the absence of perforation in the LV wall, the pericardial fluid was examined for the presence of blood or blue dye. After removal of the atria and right ventricle, the LV was cut into 5-mm-thick slices that corresponded to the MR image sections (ie, long-axis coronal views of the heart). The number of examined slices depended on the volume of injectant administered—that is, when 0.5 mL of contrast agent was injected, a total of eight heart slices from the six dogs were examined; when 1.0 mL was injected, a total 14 slices were examined; and when 2.0 mL was injected, a total of 21 slices were examined. The slices were imaged by using a flat-bed MR imaging unit. The surface areas of all nonstained and blue dye–stained heart slices were summed to determine the percentage of stained area in each heart (n = 6). The gadolinium-enhanced and blue dye–stained regions were measured (by M.S. and G.A.K.) by using the previously described public domain image analysis software (NIH Image) (17).

Statistical Analyses
Data are presented as means ± standard errors of the means. The sizes of the marked areas (ie, gadolinium-enhanced and blue dye–stained regions) after the injection of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture in each of the six dogs were measured and compared. The significance of mean differences in the sizes of the marked areas after injection of the three volumes was determined by using repeated-measures analysis of variance. We also performed post hoc pairwise comparisons of the mean differences by using the Scheffé test. Differences between the gadolinium-enhanced and blue dye–stained regions were determined by using the paired Student t test for continuous data. The same statistical test was used to compare the heart rates, blood pressures, and oxygen tensions before and after administration of the injectants.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Intramyocardial delivery of the three extracellular tissue markers—iohexol, gadodiamide, and Evans blue dye—was accomplished without deleterious hemodynamic effects. Intramyocardial delivery of 2-mL volumes caused no significant changes in heart rate (102 beats per minute ± 6 before and 99 beats per minute ± 7 after injection), blood oxygen saturation (98% ± 2 before and 98% ± 3 after injection), or arterial blood pressure (92 mm Hg ± 2/60 mm Hg ± 4 before and 90 mm Hg ± 4/61 mm Hg ± 3 after injection). At postmortem examination, there was no evidence of vascular perforation, valvular damage, or myocardial injury (ie, perforation or intramyocardial bleeding) caused by the advancement or manipulation of the endovascular catheter.

X-ray fluoroscopy depicted the catheter in the LV and the three enhanced injection sites after the administration of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL of iohexol in the myocardium. All 18 sites of iohexol injection showed increased radiographic density (Fig 3), but the volume of the regions with increased radiographic density could not be measured on the two-dimensional fluoroscopic images. Because of the two-dimensional nature of x-ray fluoroscopic images, the volumes of the enhanced regions on these images could not be quantified or compared with the volumes of the gadolinium-enhanced regions on the MR images or the volumes of the blue dye–stained regions on the heart tissue at postmortem examination.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Transendocardial delivery of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL of iohexol with x-ray fluoroscopic guidance. The left and middle images show the catheter (arrowhead). Left: The catheter tip (white arrow) and the enhanced region (black arrow) are visible after administration of 0.5 mL of iohexol. Middle: Two enhanced regions (arrows) are visible after administration of 1.0 and 0.5 mL of iohexol. Right: An enhanced region on the other side of the LV (arrow) is visible after administration of 2.0 mL of iohexol.

 
An oblique-coronal MR fluoroscopic view showing the descending and ascending aorta was used for LV catheterization. This imaging view facilitated the advancement of the catheter over the aortic arch and across the aortic valve. Rotation and steering of the catheter allowed the delivery of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture to different LV regions. Figure 4 shows two adjacent oblique-coronal MR fluoroscopic images that were used to guide the catheter into the LV. These images also show the catheter inside the LV and the tip against the endocardial wall at two selected sites of injection of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Left: Long-axis view of the LV on steady-state free precession MR image (3.8/1.89) shows the catheter (arrows) passing into the LV at the apex of the heart via the aorta. Right: Oblique-coronal steady-state free precession MR image (3.8/1.89) shows the change in position of the catheter (arrowhead)—from the apex to the posterior wall of the LV wall—made by using the steering device on the handle of the catheter-guiding system.

 
The sites of injection (total of 18 injections in a total of six dogs) of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture appeared bright (ie, highly enhanced) and had well-defined borders on the T1-weighted dual-inversion-recovery black blood MR images (Fig 5), enabling measurement of the enhanced regions. In all six dogs, transmural enhancement was seen only after the administration of 2 mL of the mixture. All of the injectant was delivered to the middle myocardial layer—that is, to a depth of 4 mm. The 4-mm depth was selected to simulate the thin LV wall in transmural chronic myocardial infarctions. To avoid perforating the LV wall, we did not evaluate the delivery of contrast agents to a greater depth. The thickness of the LV wall in these normal canine hearts was 10–12 mm.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. Left: Electrocardiographically gated dual-inversion-recovery T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR image (oblique-coronal view, 500/40) shows transmural enhancement at the heart apex (arrows) after administration of 2 mL of the gadodiamide-blue dye mixture. The two other injection sites are not shown. Middle: At postmortem examination, the corresponding coronal section of the LV on the heart specimen, as indicated by the large papillary muscles (black arrow), is stained blue; the right ventricle and atrium were excised. The two white arrows point to the transmural distribution of the blue dye at the heart apex. Right: Entire excised heart and the transmural distribution of the blue dye at the apex (arrows). There is no blood or blue dye in the pericardial fluid of the heart. This absence of blood and dye suggests successful intramyocardial injection and no perforation of the LV wall after the injections of the gadodiamide-blue dye mixture.

 
The size of the gadolinium-enhanced region depended on the injected volume of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture. Analysis of variance results showed that the mean sizes of the gadolinium-enhanced regions that resulted from the different injected volumes were significantly different (F = 35.619, df = 2, 12; P < .001). The mean size of the gadolinium-enhanced regions in the six dogs was 1.5% ± 0.6 of the LV when 0.5 mL was injected versus 3.6% ± 0.4 of the LV when 1.0 mL was injected (P = .023, Scheffé test), and 7.0% ± 0.5 of the LV when 2.0 mL was injected (P < .001 for comparison with mean size after 0.5-mL injection, P = .001 for comparison with mean size after 1.0-mL injection).

Figure 5 shows a differentially enhanced myocardium after the administration of 2.0 mL of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture. At postmortem examination, all 18 sites of injection of the mixture were stained blue. Analysis of variance results showed that the mean sizes of the blue dye–stained regions that resulted from the different injected volumes were significantly different (F = 46.514, df = 2, 12; P < .001). The mean sizes of the blue dye–stained regions in the six dogs were 2.3% ± 0.6 of the LV after the 0.5-mL injection, 4.5% ± 0.3 of the LV after the 1.0-mL injection (P = .015 for comparison with mean size after the 0.5-mL dose, Scheffé test), and 8.3% ± 0.4 of the LV after the 2.0-mL injection (P < .001 for comparisons with the mean sizes after both the 0.5-mL dose and the 1.0-mL dose). All of the blue dye–stained regions were significantly (P < .001 for 0.5 mL, P = .001 for 1.0 mL, and P < .001 for 2.0 mL; paired Student t test) larger than the gadolinium-enhanced regions on the MR images.

Figure 6 shows the catheter coated with three gadolinium oxide markers in the LV before and after administration of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture. The catheter was navigated by using real-time MR imaging to deliver the contrast agent to the borders of an area of interest (ie, target) in the myocardium. Targets were created in the myocardium by injecting a diluted concentration of gadodiamide (ie, 2 mL of 0.05 mol/L). Targets were defined as bright regions 1.5–2.5 cm in diameter. The MR images in Figures 4 and 6 depict different injection sites with low (0.05 mol/L) (Figs 4, 6) and high (0.5 mol/L) (Fig 6) gadodiamide concentrations. After injection of the low concentration of gadodiamide, the injection site appeared bright owing to the dominant T1 effect of this contrast agent. Injecting a nondiluted concentration of gadodiamide (ie, 0.2 mL of 0.5 mol/L) caused signal intensity loss at the borders of the enhanced region owing to the susceptibility, or T2*, effect of the agent. The images in Figure 6 demonstrate the signal intensity loss around each side of the highly enhanced target and thus the ability to deliver agents to the borders of an area of interest (ie, the margins of a previously highly enhanced myocardial region).



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Electrocardiographically gated dual-inversion-recovery T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images (500/40). Top left: The gadolinium oxide markers (arrows) on the catheter are clearly visualized inside the LV chamber before the injection of the contrast materials. MR image shows the enhancement resulting from the injection of the gadodiamide-blue dye mixture. Top right: Diluted gadodiamide (0.05 mol/L) produced a bright zone (arrow) by shortening the myocardial T1. Two injections of nondiluted gadodiamide (ie, 0.2 mL of 0.5 mol/L) had been administered to deliver the contrast agent to the borders of the highly enhanced area of interest—that is, to hit the target. Bottom left and right: Nondiluted gadodiamide injected into the myocardium created a signal intensity loss owing to the T2* effect of the contrast material (arrows).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
LV catheterization via percutaneous arterial access and delivery of extracellular tissue markers by way of a transendocardial route were feasible with use of x-ray/MR fluoroscopic guidance. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of using x-ray/MR fluoroscopy to facilitate precise targeted delivery of extracellular tissue markers, depict the distribution of focally delivered extracellular agents in the myocardium, and enable quantification of the volume of the myocardial region into which the agents are delivered. The injection catheter was navigated with real-time MR fluoroscopic guidance to deliver contrast agent to—that is, "hit"—the borders of the area of interest. The described results demonstrate that the size of the enhanced region depends on the volume of agent injected.

The real-time steady-state free precession MR imaging sequence generated adequate spatial and temporal (10 frames per second) resolution for tracking the advancement of the catheter into the LV. Results of the electrocardiographically gated dual-inversion-recovery T1-weighted MR imaging examination that was used to map the distribution of gadodiamide showed that the size of the gadolinium-enhanced region varied with the volume of gadodiamide–blue dye mixture injected. The procedures used to advance the catheter and to deposit the tissue marker in the myocardium caused neither acute deleterious cardiac effects, such as arrhythmia or increased or decreased heart rate or blood pressure, nor myocardial or vascular trauma or perforation.

X-ray/MR Fluoroscopy
Cardiovascular interventions performed by using MR imaging guidance are challenging in clinical applications. Various MR imaging unit configurations have been used to perform interventional procedures; these include open- and closed-bore systems, high-magnetic-field and low-magnetic-field systems, and the currently described hybrid x-ray/MR fluoroscopy system. The described x-ray/MR fluoroscopy system, by providing the possibility to continue or extend the intervention if it is restricted by MR imaging factors, has the potential to facilitate improved flexibility in interventional procedures. It also allows the possibility of reverting to the successful vascular intervention by using fluoroscopic control if MR imaging guidance proves to be limited.

The x-ray/MR fluoroscopy system used in this study has the advantages of both two-dimensional fluoroscopy and three-dimensional MR imaging for guiding and monitoring interventional procedures (16). Since contrast-enhanced MR imaging can depict ischemia (18) and myocardial infarction (19), the possibility of using real-time MR imaging to deliver local therapeutic agents such as angiogenic growth factors and stem cells is attractive. Catheter navigation is routinely performed with fluoroscopic guidance; however, the size of the enhanced myocardial region cannot be readily quantified or localized in the LV wall with two-dimensional fluoroscopic images.

The main advantages of using a hybrid x-ray/MR fluoroscopy system are as follows: (a) The fluoroscopy system can be used to guide the catheters into the ascending aorta, or even into the heart, and the injection of solution into the myocardium can be performed by using MR imaging guidance and localization. MR imaging also can be used to visualize the distribution of the therapeutic agent in the myocardium. (b) Fluoroscopic guidance may be critical when the ileofemoral vessels are tortuous or narrowed.

The results of the current study are consistent with those described in an earlier report (10), which also showed that a delivery catheter could be guided to the myocardium by using real-time MR imaging. In addition, the current study results show that the catheter can be navigated to deliver solution to the border of the area of interest, or hit the target, and the effect of the volume of solution injected can be measured in the myocardium. Moreover, x-ray/MR fluoroscopy can enable one to continue or extend a vascular intervention when MR imaging factors restrict the procedure. The combination x-ray/MR fluoroscopy system may be useful for local drug delivery (ie, through the myocardium, pericardium, or coronary artery) and for assessment of myocardial function after the intervention.

Differential Enhancement
The 18 selected LV regions in the six dogs after injections of the gadodiamide–blue dye mixture appeared bright and had well-defined borders on the dual-inversion-recovery contrast-enhanced MR images. Lederman et al (13) observed that the transendocardial injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine causes differential enhancement for more than 10 minutes. The short-lived enhancement in the normal myocardium after focal delivery of the extracellular markers can be attributed to (a) the fast washout of the contrast material due to good myocardial perfusion, (b) a high gradient of gadolinium concentration between the blood and the interstitium, and (c) the fast renal clearance of extracellular MR imaging contrast material (19).

The described agent-delivery procedure is a potential method for the direct delivery of gene therapy and multipotential cells to infarcted myocardium. Delayed contrast enhancement of infarcted myocardium after intravenous injection of extracellular MR imaging contrast material—simulated with gadodiamide in this study—is an MR imaging approach to targeting the infarcted region. This delayed enhancement persists for 20–30 minutes, providing a window of time for an interventionist to hit the target. The prolonged enhancement of the infarcted myocardium is most likely related to poor myocardial perfusion (ie, slow washout) and a large (ie, >80%) fractional distribution volume of the contrast material (1921).

The sizes of the gadolinium-enhanced and blue dye–stained regions depended on the volumes of these contrast agents injected. The sizes of the blue dye–stained regions at postmortem examination were larger than the gadolinium-enhanced regions on MR images. The slight but significant overestimation of the size of the blue dye–stained regions at postmortem examination was most likely due to the fast diffusion of the extracellular marker during the time between MR imaging and animal sacrifice.

Endovascular Catheters and MR Imaging
The prototype endovascular catheter with an adjustable 1–7-mm nitinol needle for puncturing the endocardial wall allows injection of solution to different depths. The needle-adjusting device on the handle of the catheter system is needed in cases of thin walls (eg, vascular wall or LV wall with transmural infarction) and thick walls (eg, wall of hypertrophied heart). In the current study, contrast agent was injected to only one depth, 4 mm, to simulate agent delivery to a thin transmural infarction (ie, scar tissue). The steering device on the handle controlled the tip deflection up to 180°. The handle allowed rotation of the catheter tip in the LV to various locations in the myocardium.

Visualization of the catheter and its tip was substantially improved after the shaft of the catheter was coated with gadolinium oxide markers. The catheter was coated with gadolinium oxide during the progression of this feasibility study. Thus, the coated catheter was tested in two animals, and more studies to address the utility and safety of this catheter are in progress. Visualization of the catheter tip (at imaging the last dark spot at the lower end of the catheter) improved our ability to hit the target. It should be noted that the use of these prototype catheters is not Food and Drug Administration approved.

Percutaneous nonfluoroscopic electromechanical mapping (1012,22) is an alternative method of delivering and assessing the effects of local therapies. This technology involves the use of electromagnetic field sensors to combine and integrate real-time information from percutaneous intracardiac electrograms acquired at multiple endocardial locations. The resulting signal can be used to distinguish between normal and infarcted myocardial regions. Although percutaneous nonfluoroscopic electromechanical mapping has been used successfully to evaluate the effect of angiogenic factors in patients (21), it enables one to only approximate areas of myocardial scarring.

The main limiting factors of this study were the potential for myocardial injury caused by the nitinol needle during the delivery of the injectant and the undetermined safety of the prototype catheter in the MR imaging setting. More in vivo studies are needed to address the safety issue.

It can be concluded from the results of this feasibility study that transendocardial delivery of potential therapeutic solutions is feasible with x-ray/MR fluoroscopic guidance. The injection catheter can be navigated with MR imaging guidance to hit the target. The distribution of the extracellular markers in the myocardium was volume dependent in this study. As has been recently reported (15,23), the labeling of cells with MR imaging contrast material will enable one to monitor the delivery, distribution, and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Practical application: The described x-ray/MR fluoroscopic technique is a potential method for the direct delivery of gene therapy and multipotential cells to ischemic myocardial regions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviation: LV = left ventricle

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, M.S., R.L., C.B.H.; study concepts and design, M.S., R.L., C.B.H.; literature research, M.S., G.A.K.; experimental studies, M.S., R.L., A.M., O.W., G.A.K., S.S., M.L.; data acquisition, M.S., A.M., O.W.; data analysis/interpretation, M.S., A.M., G.A.K.; statistical analysis, M.S., R.L., G.A.K.; manuscript preparation, M.S.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, M.S., R.L., A.M., O.W., G.A.K., M.L., D.S., C.B.H.; manuscript editing, M.S., C.B.H., A.M.; manuscript revision/review, M.S., R.L., A.M., C.B.H.; manuscript final version approval, all authors


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Losordo DW, Vale PR, Symes JF, et al. Gene therapy for myocardial angiogenesis: initial clinical results with direct myocardial injection of phVEGF165 as sole therapy for myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1998; 98:2800-2804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Symes JF, Losordo DW, Vale PR, et al. Gene therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor for inoperable coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:830-836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rosengart TK, Lee LY, Patel SR, et al. Angiogenesis gene therapy: phase I assessment of direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing VEGF121 cDNA to individuals with clinically significant severe coronary artery disease. Circulation 1999; 100:468-474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sarkar N, Rück A, Källner G, et al. Effects of intramyocardial injection of phVEGEF-A165 as sole therapy in patients with refractory coronary artery disease: 12-month follow-up—angiogenic gene therapy. J Intern Med 2001; 250:373-381.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Lazarous DF, Scheinowitz M, Shou M, et al. Effect of chronic systemic administration of basic fibroblast growth factor on collateral development in the canine heart. Circulation 1995; 91:145-153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Giordano FJ, Ping P, Mckirnan D, et al. Intracoronary gene transfer of fibroblast growth factor-5 increases blood flow and contractile function in an ischemic region of the heart. Nat Med 1996; 2:534-539.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Simons M. Phase II, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study for safety, pharmakocinetics, and efficacy of recombinant fibroblast growth factor (rFGF-2) in subjects with coronary artery disease (CAD): FGF-2 Initiating Revascularization Support Trial (FIRST). J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:310-325.[Free Full Text]
  8. Laham RJ, Rezaee M, Post M, et al. Intracoronary and intravenous administration of basic fibroblast growth factor: myocardial and tissue distribution. Drug Metab Dispos 1999; 27:821-826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Inoue M, Itoh H, Ueda M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions: possible pathophysiological significance of VEGF in progression of atherosclerosis. Circulation 1998; 98:2108-2116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Wolf T, Gepstein L, Dror U, et al. Detailed endocardial mapping accurately predicts the transmural extent of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:1590-1597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wolf T, Gepstein L, Hayam G, et al. Three-dimensional endocardial impedance mapping: a new approach for myocardial infarction assessment. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2001; 280:H179-H188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Perin EC, Silva GV, Sarmento-Leite R, et al. Assessing myocardial viability and infarct transmurality with left ventricular electromechanical mapping in patients with stable coronary artery disease: validation by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002; 106:957-961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lederman RJ, Guttman MA, Peters DC, et al. Catheter-based endomyocardial injection with real-time magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002; 105:1282-1284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yang X, Atalar E, Li D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging permits in vivo monitoring of catheter-based vascular gene delivery. Circulation 2001; 104:1588-1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kraitchman DL, Heldman AW, Atalar E, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of mesenchymal stem cells in myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003; 107:2290-2293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kuehne T, Saeed M, Higgins CB, et al. Endovascular stents in pulmonary valve and artery in swine: feasibility study of MR imaging-guided deployment and postinterventional assessment. Radiology 2003; 226:475-481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. National Institutes of Health. NIH image. Available at: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/. Accessed October 30 2002.
  18. Saeed M, Wendland MF, Szolar D, et al. Quantification of the extent of area at risk with fast contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in experimental coronary artery stenosis. Am Heart J 1996; 132:921-923.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Saeed M, Higgins CB, Geschwind JF, et al. T1-relaxation kinetics of extracellular, intracellular and intravascular MR contrast agents in normal and acutely reperfused infarcted myocardium using echoplanar MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:310-318.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Hirano T, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: myocardial viability assessment in patients early thereafter—comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging with resting (201)Tl SPECT. Radiology 2003; 226:138-144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Saeed M, Lund G, Wendland MF, et al. Magnetic resonance characterization of the peri-infarction zone of reperfused myocardial infarction using necrosis specific and extracellular nonspecific contrast media. Circulation 2001; 103:871-876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Vale PR, Losordo DW, Milliken CE, et al. Left ventricular electromechanical mapping to assess efficacy of phVEGF(165) gene transfer for therapeutic angiogenesis in chronic myocardial ischemia. Circulation 2000; 102:965-974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hill JM, Dick AJ, Raman VK, et al. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of injected mesenchymal stem cells. Circulation 2003; 108:1009-1014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Saeed, A. Martin, A. Jacquier, M. Bucknor, D. Saloner, L. Do, P. Ursell, H. Su, Y. W. Kan, and C. B. Higgins
Permanent Coronary Artery Occlusion: Cardiovascular MR Imaging Is Platform for Percutaneous Transendocardial Delivery and Assessment of Gene Therapy in Canine Model
Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 560 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Saeed, A. J. Martin, R. J. Lee, O. Weber, D. Revel, D. Saloner, and C. B. Higgins
MR Guidance of Targeted Injections into Border and Core of Scarred Myocardium in Pigs
Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 419 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. J. Lederman
Cardiovascular Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Circulation, November 8, 2005; 112(19): 3009 - 3017.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saeed, M.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saeed, M.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE