Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2333021670
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, S. M.
(Radiology 2004;233:697-700.)
© RSNA, 2004


Diagnosis Please

Case 77: Aggressive Angiomyxoma1

Sarah T. Stewart, MD and Shirley M. McCarthy, MD, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Yale New Haven Hospital, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06511. Received December 15, 2002; revision requested February 27, 2003; revision received May 5; accepted June 23. Address correspondence to S.T.S.

Index terms: Diagnosis Please • Lipoma and lipomatosis, 44.319 • Pelvis, abnormalities, 44.319


    HISTORY
 TOP
 HISTORY
 IMAGING FINDINGS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A 39-year-old gravida 4, para 4 woman with a medical history remarkable only for hypertension and frequent urinary tract infections presented to the emergency department with complaints of acute-onset right flank and low back pain. Vaginal examination revealed slight fullness, with bulging of the right vaginal mucosa, but no tenderness or frank mass. The patient was treated empirically for pyelonephritis; however, her symptoms did not improve, and she returned to the emergency department 3 days later. At this time, an unenhanced computed tomographic (CT) examination of the abdomen and pelvis was performed, followed by a magnetic resonance (MR) examination of the pelvis.


    IMAGING FINDINGS
 TOP
 HISTORY
 IMAGING FINDINGS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis obtained without intravenous contrast material (Fig 1) demonstrates a low-attenuating soft-tissue mass displacing the right posterolateral wall of the vagina, abutting the right anterolateral wall of the rectum, and extending toward the right ischiorectal fossa.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Transverse unenhanced CT scan demonstrates low-attenuation mass (arrow) in the right perirectal area.

 
A T1-weighted MR image (Fig 2) demonstrates a homogeneous hypointense 4.4 x 3.5 x 3.0-cm mass posterolateral to the vagina and anterolateral to the rectum. A sagittal MR image (Fig 3) shows a finger like projection extending inferiorly from the mass. The mass is contiguous with the right levator ani muscle and approximately 30% of the rectal wall and displaces the vagina to the left. The margins of the mass are not well defined within the right ischiorectal fat. This mass has heterogeneous increased signal intensity at T2-weighted MR imaging (Fig 4) and is heterogeneously enhanced after intravenous administration of gadodiamide (Fig 5). An incidental note was made of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis.



View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Transverse T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient-echo precontrast MR image (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 200/3.4) shows a well-marginated mass (arrow).

 


View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Sagittal fast short inversion time inversion-recovery MR image (repetition time msec/echo time msec/inversion time msec, 4166/63/140) shows a heterogenous hyperintense mass (black arrow) on the right levator muscle with fingerlike projections (white arrow) extending from the mass.

 


View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (3850/126) shows a hyperintense mass (arrow) that is contiguous with the right levator ani muscle and displaces the right vaginal wall laterally and abuts the right lateral wall of the rectum.

 


View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. Transverse T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient-echo postcontrast MR image (200/3.4) shows a well-marginated heterogeneously enhancing mass (arrow).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 HISTORY
 IMAGING FINDINGS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The CT and MR findings in this patient demonstrate a well-defined enhancing soft-tissue mass in the perineum adjacent to and displacing the vagina and rectum. Although the mass extends toward the right ischiorectal fossa fat, it does not appear to infiltrate the muscles or invade the pelvic organs. The low attenuation at unenhanced CT and high signal intensity at T2-weighted MR imaging are consistent with a myxoid matrix, high water content within the mass, or both. The enhancement of T1-weighted MR images after administration of gadolinium is related to the vascularity of aggressive angiomyxoma (AAM) (1). There is no evidence of gross fat within the mass, which distinguishes this tumor from other fat-containing tumors that also occur in the pelvis of women. The combination of these radiologic findings and the patient’s symptoms related to a space-occupying lesion within the right pelvis make AAM the most likely diagnosis.

AAM is a rare benign soft-tissue tumor that contains myxoid and vascular components, as described by Steeper and Rosai in 1983 (2). Rare instances of AAM in men have been reported (3), but the majority of these tumors involve the pelvis—particularly the perineum—in women of childbearing age (4). AAM is a compliant tumor, with a propensity to grow to large sizes within the pelvis, particularly within the perineum. The tumor is locally infiltrative but tends to displace adjacent organs without invading them. AAM metastases have not been reported (1); nevertheless, AAM is regarded as an aggressive neoplasm because of its propensity to recur locally if it is not completely excised (3). Indeed, complete surgical excision has been reported (3) to be technically difficult secondary to the bulky and locally infiltrative nature of this tumor.

The typical imaging characteristics of AAM, including those seen at ultrasonography (US), CT, MR imaging, and angiography, led to a description of AAM as a hypervascular tumor that demonstrates indolent growth and surrounds the structures of the pelvic floor without invading adjacent organs.

CT scanning of AAM (5,6) typically demonstrates a well-defined moderately enhanced mass within the pelvis or perineum that is iso- or hypoattenuated relative to muscle.

On T1-weighted MR images, the tumor is isointense when compared with muscle (6); however, after administration of contrast material, there is moderate enhancement of the tumor. On T2-weighted MR images, there is high signal intensity within the tumor. Outwater et al (1) describe the tumor as having distinctive internal architecture composed of a swirled or layered appearance on contrast-enhanced CT scans and T2-weighted MR images. This effect is attributed to enhancement of the fibrovascular stroma that develops in AAM tumors as they protrude through the pelvic diaphragm. MR imaging shows a lack of high fat content, which is a key feature in differentiating AAM from the main differential considerations, myxoid liposarcoma and infiltrating angiolipoma.

Catalano (5) described the US findings of a single AAM that demonstrated a homogeneous and hypoechoic internal structure. In another report, US was used to depict AAM, and primarily cystic masses were noted (1). Studies of AAM with angiography all demonstrate a hypervascular mass with multiple feeding vessels (1).

At gross pathologic examination, AAM is a large bulky mass, partially or completely encapsulated, with a grossly gelatinous appearance. Measurements range from 3 to 60 cm, and fingerlike projections are commonly reported (2). Histologically, AAM (2) consists of spindle or stellate cells separated by a myxoid stroma with abundant fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and variably sized vessels. Mitotic activity has been shown to be rare in most cases (3,7).

Surgical excision is the primary treatment for AAM. Although the tumor is histologically benign (2), locally aggressive behavior and high recurrence rates require complete excision, if possible. The appearance of AAM on MR images is valuable in the identification of characteristic features of this tumor, evaluation of tumor extent, and planning of surgery (6). Recurrence rates of 36%–72% (8) have been reported. Chan et al (9) propose that incomplete resection is acceptable because AAM is a benign tumor and because, in some cases, complete resection has high surgical morbidity and can threaten fertility in a patient population that is composed of mainly women who are in their child bearing years. Radiation therapy or chemotherapy is unlikely to be helpful, as patients with AAM demonstrate low mitotic activity (8,9). Long-term follow-up with CT and, preferably, MR imaging is recommended, since recurrences have been reported several years after first excision (8).

The differential diagnosis includes myxoma, which is another benign mesenchymal neoplasm that most frequently occurs in older patients (2). Myxoma resembles AAM microscopically, but it lacks the vascular component and does not enhance, as does AAM. While myxoma is mainly intramuscular (10), AAM may abut the pelvic or perineal musculature but does not invade it. In rare instances, non-Hodgkin lymphoma may be seen in this area.

Infiltrating angiolipoma is also a benign soft-tissue neoplasm similar to AAM in that it demonstrates no mitotic activity, requires wide surgical excision, and does not metastasize (11). Infiltrating angiolipoma differs from AAM; however, in that it is usually found in the thigh region. Regarding imaging, infiltrating angiolipoma—as the name implies—infiltrates and replaces involved muscle and subcutaneous tissue (12). Angiography demonstrates a hypervascular lesion similar to AAM; but it also demonstrates a poorly marginated lesion with large draining veins. Characteristic CT findings of infiltrating angiolipoma are a largely intramuscular tumor with a heterogeneous appearance secondary to gross fat and blood vessels within infiltrated muscle. Histologically, this tumor is composed of mature lipocytes with angiomatous proliferation.

Myxoid lipoma is a morphologic variant of lipoma and is thought by some to be the benign counterpart to liposarcoma (2). As with AAM, myxoid lipoma is predominantly myxoid in nature, but it can contain mature fat with a transition zone between myxoid and fat components. Myxoid liposarcoma, which is a malignant tumor, most commonly occurs in lower extremities within the intramuscular fat planes in middle-aged individuals who present with a painless slow-growing mass (13). There is homogenous enhancement after administration of contrast material, whereas AAM is more heterogeneously enhanced.

In summary, the most likely diagnosis in this young woman with a pelvic mass is AAM, since the constellation of imaging findings demonstrates a heterogeneously enhancing soft-tissue mass that displaces but does not invade adjacent pelvic organs.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Part one of this case appeared 4 months previously and may contain larger images.

Authors stated no financial relationship to disclose.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 HISTORY
 IMAGING FINDINGS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Outwater EK, Marchetto BE, Wagner BJ, Siegelman ES. Aggressive angiomyxoma: findings on CT and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:435-438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Steeper TA, Rosai J. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the female pelvis and perineum: report of nine cases of a distinctive type of gynecologic soft-tissue neoplasm. Am J Surg Pathol 1983; 7:463-475.[Medline]
  3. Smith HO, Worrell RV, Smith AY, Dorin MH, Rosenberg RD, Bartow SA. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the female pelvis and perineum: review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 1991; 42:79-85.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Nielsen GP, Young RH. Mesenchymal tumors and tumor-like lesions of the female genital tract: a selective review with emphasis on recently described entities. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2001; 20:105-127.[Medline]
  5. Catalano O. Case report: aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvic soft tissues—US and CT findings. Clin Radiol 1998; 53:782-783.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Davani M, Chablani VN, Saba PR. Aggressive angiomyxoma of pelvic soft tissues: MR imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1113-1114.[Medline]
  7. Steiner E, Schadmand-Fischer S, Schunk K, et al. Perineal excision of a large angiomyxoma in a young woman following magnetic resonance and angiographic imaging. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82:568-570.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Behranwala KA, Clark MA, Thomas JM. Soft-tissue tumors of the perineum. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28:437-442.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Chan YM, Hon E, Ngai SW, Ng TY, Wong LC, Chan IM. Aggressive angiomyxoma in females: is radical resection the only option? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79:216-220.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Elchalal U, Lischitz-Mercer B, Dgani R, Zalel Y. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1992; 47:260-262.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Chien AJ, Freeby JA, Win TT, Gadwood KA. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the female pelvis: sonographic CT and MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:530-531.[Free Full Text]
  12. Chew FS, Hudson TM, Hawkins IF, Jr. Radiology of infiltrating angiolipoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980; 135:781-787.[Abstract]
  13. Sung MS, Kang HS, Suh JS, et al. Myxoid liposarcoma: appearance at MR imaging with histologic correlations. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1007-1019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Congratulations to the 19 individuals who submitted the most likely diagnosis (aggressive angiomyxoma) for Diagnosis Please, Case 77. The names and locations of the individuals, as submitted, are as follows:
Albert J. Alter, Madison, Wis
Michael P. Buetow, MD, Okemos, Mich
Marc G. de Baets, Lugano, Switzerland
Akira Fujikawa, Tokyo, Japan
Roberto Garcia Figueiras, MD, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Ferris M. Hall, MD, Boston, Mass
Glenn Krinsky, New York, NY
Stefanos Lachanis, MD, Athens, Greece
Manabu Minami, MD, Ibaraki, Japan
David M. Panicek, MD, New York, NY
Taro Shimono, MD, Osaka, Japan
Hiroshi Shinmoto, MD, Toyko, Japan
Kouichi Sugiyama, Hamamatsu, Japan
Norio Takahashi, MD, Fukui, Japan
Satoru Takahashi, Osaka, Japan
Douglas L. Teich, MD, Brookline, Mass
Meric Tuzun, Ankara, Turkey
Hiroyuki Ueda, Kyoto, Japan
Joan C. (Kai) Vilanova, MD, Girona, Spain




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Demir, H. Genchellac, H. Ozdemir, R. Sinha, and R. Verma
Perineal Angiomyxomas: Can a Differential Diagnosis Be Made with Imaging Studies?
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 612 - 613.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, S. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE