Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2333030804
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Straten, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Roos, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Straten, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Roos, A.
(Radiology 2004;233:824-829.)
© RSNA, 2004


Cardiac Imaging

Right Ventricular Function after Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot1

Alexander van Straten, MD, Hubert W. Vliegen, MD, Mark G. Hazekamp, MD, Jeroen J. Bax, MD, Paul H. Schoof, MD, Jaap Ottenkamp, MD, Ernst E. van der Wall, MD and Albert de Roos, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (A.v.S., A.d.R.), Cardiology (H.W.V., J.J.B., E.E.v.d.W.), Cardiothoracic Surgery (M.G.H., P.H.S.), and Pediatric Cardiology (J.O.), Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received May 22, 2003; revision requested August 4; final revision received February 25, 2004; accepted April 1. Address correspondence to A.d.R. (e-mail: a.de_roos@lumc.nl).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To assess the time course of right ventricular (RV) function improvement after pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in patients 25.2 years ± 7.0 after repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical ethics committee approved this study, and informed consent was obtained. Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed before, 7 months after, and 19 months after PVR in 25 consecutive patients with tetralogy of Fallot with a 1.5-T MR imager. RV function was assessed with gradient-echo sequences in the short-axis plane. Pulmonary flow was assessed with a velocity-encoded phase-contrast sequence. Paired t test was used to evaluate follow-up data. Independent samples t test was used to assess differences based on the presence of recurrent pulmonary regurgitation (PR).

RESULTS: Mean indexed RV end-diastolic volume decreased from 166.9 mL/m2 ± 41.3 before PVR to 113.5 mL/m2± 35.7 (P < .001) at 7-month follow-up and 111.7 mL/m2± 41.1 (P = .46) at 19-month follow-up. The RV ejection fraction was corrected for PR and improved from 25.0% ± 7.7 before surgery to 44.1% ± 11.9 (P < .001) and 45.2% ± 11.1 (P = .39), at 7- and 19-month follow-up, respectively. Recurrent PR after PVR was found in 11 patients; 14 patients did not have recurrent PR. Total reduction of indexed RV end-diastolic volume at 19 months follow-up was more prominent in patients who did not have recurrent PR than in patients who did have recurrent PR (P < .05). Furthermore, improvement of RV ejection fraction corrected for regurgitation was more marked in patients who did not have recurrent PR than in patients who did have recurrent PR (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: In patients with tetralogy of Fallot, RV function improves rapidly after PVR and is sustained at 19-month follow-up in most patients; however, recurrence of PR after PVR appears to reduce recovery of RV systolic function.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Heart, function, 523.145 • Heart, MR, 523.121412 • Heart, surgery, 51.45 • Heart, ventricles, 523.145 • Tetralogy of Fallot, 52.145


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tetralogy of Fallot, the most common of all cyanotic congenital heart diseases, is the combination of an overriding aorta, ventricular septal defect, pulmonary stenosis, and hypertrophy of the right ventricle (RV). The aim of the surgeon at initial repair is to obtain adequate pulmonary circulation. To achieve this, the pulmonary stenosis is relieved, and the ventricular septal defect is closed by using a pericardial patch (1). Although long-term results are good (24), most patients have some degree of pulmonary valve incompetence after repair, following the relief of pulmonary stenosis. The deleterious effects of longstanding pulmonary regurgitation (PR) on RV size and function, resulting in an increased risk for severe arrhythmias and sudden death, have been well documented (58). Furthermore, exercise capacity is often diminished in patients with severe dilatation of the RV (9,10). Recent studies have shown that RV dysfunction in patients with tetralogy of Fallot is also affected by the initial surgical procedure and the formation of aneurysms in the RV outflow tract, which commonly occurs after initial repair (11,12).

Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) is often performed in patients with tetralogy of Fallot who have longstanding PR and severe RV dilatation and leads to direct volumeunloading of the RV. In a recent study by Vliegen et al (13), the early hemodynamic effects of PVR in adults were evaluated 24 years after initial repair of tetralogy of Fallot. A significant decrease of RV dilatation of approximately 30% and an improvement of systolic function and validity according to the New York Heart Association classification was found in these patients 7 months after surgery. Mid- and long-term outcome in patients after PVR is largely unknown. Several reports have mentioned residual or recurrent PR after surgery (14,15); however, we are unaware of any studies that have systematically evaluated the clinical importance of recurrent PR and the time course of RV recovery.

Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to assess the time course of RV function improvement after pulmonary PVR in patients long after repair of tetralogy of Fallot.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study Subjects
Between 1993 and 2002, a total of 65 patients underwent PVR for PR after correction of tetralogy of Fallot at our institution. Since 1997, 25 consecutive adult patients with tetralogy of Fallot underwent PVR for RV dilatation and PR 25.2 years ± 7.0 after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Patients were evaluated preoperatively with cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and were included in the study. MR imaging was performed in all patients before PVR (median, 5.3 months; range, 3.1–15.6 months) and repeated 7 months (median, 7.2 months; range, 4.3–13.6 months) and 19 months (median, 18.6 months; range, 17.2–34.9 months) after PVR. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median age at total repair (closure of ventricular septal defect in combination with relief of pulmonary stenosis) was 4.9 years (mean, 5.7 years ± 4.3; range, 0.4–21.0 years). A palliative procedure was performed prior to total repair in 11 patients (44%). Nine patients (36%) received a transannular patch. An electrocardiogram was obtained shortly before PVR in all patients. QRS duration was manually measured by the same observer (H.W.V.) from the first deflection in any lead to the latest deflection in any lead. This study was approved by the local medical ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics

 
Surgical Procedures
PVR was performed in patients without perioperative mortality (median age, 28.9 years; range, 17.0–45.6 years) Surgery was performed by two surgeons (M.G.H., P.H.S.) with 10 years experience in PVR. All patients underwent surgery with normothermic or moderately hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. All pulmonary valve insertions were performed in the beating heart. Aortic cross-clamping was dependent on surgeon preference or concomitant procedures. Recurrent ventricular septal defects were closed in three patients. All patients received a cryopreserved pulmonary homograft that was orthotopically inserted in the pulmonary position. Calcified outflow tract patch material was resected as much as possible. In four patients, the RV outflow tract diameter was surgically reduced; in three of these patients, a pericardial patch was used to obtain a better fit between the outflow tract of the RV and the homograft. In seven patients, a patch was used for the same purpose but without RV outflow tract reduction. In five patients, significant pulmonary stenosis was present before PVR; however, the stenosis was relieved during the PVR procedure.

MR Imaging
MR studies were performed with a 1.5-T system (NT15 Gyroscan; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). The MR protocol has been described previously (13). In summary, a multiphase electrocardiographically triggered multishot echoplanar gradient-echo technique was used to acquire short-axis images. Images were acquired during breath holds. Section thickness was 10 mm, with a section gap of 0.8–1.0 mm. The flip angle was 30°, and the echo time was 5–10 msec. A total of 18–25 frames were obtained per cycle and resulted in a temporal resolution of 22–35 msec.

Velocity mapping was performed with a velocity-encoded phase-contrast sequence. For velocity mapping of the pulmonary artery, sagittal and coronal spin-echo scout images were used to construct a double-oblique plane perpendicular to the vessel. Pulmonary flow measurements were obtained halfway between the pulmonary valve and the bifurcation or approximately 2 cm proximal to the bifurcation when no pulmonary valve was present. The sequence was encoded for through-plane velocities of up to 200 cm/sec. For velocity mapping of flow through the tricuspid valve, two- and four-chamber gradient-echo images were used to construct a parallel plane through the valve. The flip angle was 20°, echo time was 12 msec, and temporal resolution was 25–35 msec. No sedation was used in any of the patients.

Postprocessing
All images were quantitatively analyzed at a Sun workstation (Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, Calif) with two software packages that were developed and validated at our institution (16). Image analysis can be performed with low inter- and intraobserver variability (17,18). All contours were drawn manually by the same observer (A.v.S.). Velocity maps were analyzed by using the analytic software package (Flow; Medis, Leiden, the Netherlands). Contours were drawn for the main pulmonary artery, and flow data were obtained from the velocity data of each voxel in all phases. Flow curves were obtained with this method for flow in the main pulmonary artery during a cardiac cycle. The regurgitant fraction was calculated with the following formula: (regurgitant flow dived by systolic forward flow) times 100. PR was considered statistically significant if the regurgitant fraction was more than 5% of the systolic forward flow. In addition, flow curves for flow through the tricuspid valve were assessed by using the same method.

The transverse gradient-echo images of the ventricles were analyzed with software (Mass; Medis) (16). The RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were assessed by drawing contours around the lumen of the RV at end diastole and end systole in all sections, as described previously (19). Section summation was used, and the total RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated with the software. RV stroke volume was then calculated with the software by deducting the RV end-systolic volume from the RV end-diastolic volume. RV ejection fraction was calculated by dividing the RV stroke volume by the RV end-diastolic volume. RV ejection fraction was then corrected for regurgitation of the tricuspid and pulmonary valves by dividing the net pulmonary flow by the RV end-diastolic volume, thus the corrected RV ejection fraction was equal to the net pulmonary flow, which was calculated by subtracting regurgitant flow from pulmonary forward flow and then dividing by the RV end-diastolic volume (13). RV end-diastolic volume and RV end-systolic volume were indexed for body surface area.

Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean values ± 1 standard deviation, unless stated otherwise. Data were analyzed by using SPSS for Windows (version 10.0; SPSS, Chicago, Ill). The paired samples Student t test was used to evaluate changes in MR parameters after PVR, and the independent samples Student t test was used to identify differences between patients with and those without recurrent PR. Statistical significance was indicated by a P value of less than .05. Repeated measuring of the variables of interest (eg, end-diastolic volume) was accounted for with a repeated-measures model (linear mixed model). Testing for equality of slopes for regression lines of variables of interest versus time was performed for the indexed RV end-diastolic volume and corrected ejection fraction. Because the latter variable is a percentage, it did not show gross violations of normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test or at visual inspection.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mean indexed RV end-diastolic volume decreased from 166.9 mL/m2± 41.3 before PVR to 113.5 mL/m2± 35.7 (P < .001) at 7-month follow-up and 111.7 mL/m2± 41.1 (P = .46 when compared with data obtained at 7-month follow-up) at 19-month follow-up. The improvement of RV dilatation was larger than the decrease in regurgitant volume through the pulmonary valve (Figure). The indexed RV end-systolic volume decreased from 98.4 mL/m2± 36.7 before surgery to 65.1 mL/m2± 35.5 (P < .001) at 7-month follow-up and 63.3 mL/m2± 38.5 (P = .21, when compared with data obtained at 7-month follow-up) at 19-month follow-up. The RV ejection fraction did not show a significant change during follow-up. Before valve replacement, the RV ejection fraction was 42.6% ± 11.2. At 7-month follow-up, the RV ejection fraction was essentially unchanged at 44.3% ± 11.0 (P = .76). At 19-month follow-up, the RV ejection fraction was 46.9% ± 11.4 (P = .10). After correction for PR, however, the corrected RV ejection fraction improved significantly from 25.0% ± 7.7 before surgery to 44.1% ± 11.9 at 7-month follow-up (P < .001) and 45.2% ± 11.1 at 19-month follow-up (P = .39 when compared with data obtained at 7-month follow-up). Furthermore, validity according to the New York Heart Association classification improved from 2.0 ± 0.6 to 1.3 ± 0.5 (P < .001) at 7-month follow-up and 1.3 ± 0.7 at 19-month follow-up (P = .65 when compared with data obtained at 7-month follow-up).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Graph shows proportional changes in RV volume and PR volume during follow-up. PR volume is virtually absent at 7-month follow-up. Note that the change in PR volume is not proportional to the decrease in RV volume, which indicates a nonlinear relationship. Vertical and dashed lines indicate decrease in RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and PR. * = decrease in RV end-systolic volume (RVESV). ** = decrease in PR.

 
Recurrent PR
Before PVR, all patients had substantial PR of more than 20%. Mean PR decreased from 45.4% ± 10.4 to 4.2% ± 7.9 at 7-month follow-up (P < .001) and was followed by a slight increase to 6.7% ± 10.9 at 19-month follow-up (P = .06). At the time of last follow-up, residual or recurrent PR of more than 5% was found in 11 patients, whereas 14 patients did not have recurrent PR. Five patients had PR at 7-month follow-up (early PR), while recurrent PR was newly detected at 19-month follow-up (late PR) in six patients. PR was mild (5%–20%) in all but two of the patients with recurrent PR who had moderate PR (20%–40%).

Baseline characteristics for both groups were similar (Table 2). Surgical techniques, however, were different between patients who had recurrent PR and those who did not. Ten patients received a pericardial patch to adapt the homograft to the RV outflow tract, and only one of them had early recurrent PR. Surgical reduction of the RV outflow tract in case of aneurysm formation was performed in four patients. No early recurrence of PR was seen in these patients. Three patients underwent surgical reduction of the RV outflow tract and insertion of a pericardial patch in the RV outflow tract. In this group, no patient had early recurrent PR. Late recurrent PR, however, was discovered in four patients with a pericardial patch and in one patient with surgical reduction of the RV outflow tract.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Baseline and Surgical Values in Patients without Recurrent PR and Patients with Recurrent PR

 
Recurrent PR and RV Recovery
Table 3 summarizes the hemodynamic and clinical parameters before and after PVR for both groups of patients. Mean indexed RV end-diastolic volume before PVR was 170.5 mL/m2± 43.3 in patients who did not have recurrent PR. In this group, mean indexed RV end-diastolic volume had decreased to 111.1 mL/m2± 19.0 (P < .001 compared with that obtained at baseline) 7 months after PVR and to 99.4 ± 19.9 mL/m2 (P < .01 compared with that obtained 7 months after PVR) 19 months after PVR. The patients with recurrent PR had a mean indexed RV end-diastolic volume of 162.0 mL/m2± 40.5 before PVR. At 7-month follow-up, indexed RV end-diastolic volume decreased to 116.7 mL/m2± 51.0 (P < .01 compared with the baseline level) in these patients. At 19-month follow-up, indexed RV end-diastolic volume had slightly increased to 122.6 mL/m2± 56.3 (P = .40 compared with that obtained at 7-month follow-up).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Time Course of Improvement of Hemodynamic Parameters

 
The time course of recovery of RV function was different between patients who had recurrent PR and those who did not. Total reduction of indexed RV end-diastolic volume in patients with recurrent PR was less than that in patients without recurrent PR (–25.5% ± 17.9 vs –40.1% ± 9.9, P = .04). Moreover, patients with early recurrent PR showed less reduction of indexed RV end-diastolic volume in the first 7 months after PVR than the patients without early recurrent PR (–19.8% ± 13.6 vs –34.9% ± 12.3, P = .03). Late recurrent PR was associated with an increase of indexed RV end-diastolic volume of 14.7% ± 10.5 between 7 and 19 months, while the patients without early or late recurrent PR showed a further decrease of indexed RV end-diastolic volume of –9.0% ± 8.9 (P < .01). Furthermore, the repeated-measures analysis (linear mixed model) indicated that the time course of decrease of RV dilatation is different between patients who had recurrent PR and those who did not (P = .02).

Three patients with recurrent PR (early recurrent PR, n = 2; late recurrent PR, n = 1) did not experience a reduction in indexed RV end-diastolic volume. These three patients had neither improvement of RV systolic function nor improvement of validity. These observations indicate that recurrent PR has a negative effect on the recovery of RV function.

RV systolic function improved along the same time course as the improvement of RV dilatation. The mean indexed RV end-systolic volume before PVR was 95.2 mL/m2± 34.7 in patients without recurrent PR and 102.4 mL/m2± 40.7 in patients with recurrent PR. In patients without recurrent PR, mean indexed RV end-systolic volume decreased to 58.3 mL/m2± 16.3 at 7-month follow-up (P < .01 compared with that obtained at baseline MR imaging); this was followed by a further decrease to 50.6 mL/m2± 12.8 at 19-month follow-up (P = .02 compared with that obtained at 7-month follow-up). The patients with recurrent PR had a mean indexed RV end-systolic volume of 73.9 mL/m2± 50.7 at 7-month follow-up (P = .02 compared with that obtained at baseline MR imaging) and 75.2 mL/m2± 54.4 at 19-month follow-up (P = .82 compared with that obtained at 7-month follow-up).

The RV ejection fraction corrected for PR increased from 25.2% ± 8.8 to 48.9% ± 9.3 at 7-month follow-up (P < .01 compared with that obtained at baseline) and 49.8% ± 5.8 at 19-month follow-up (P = .14 compared with that obtained at 7-month follow-up) in patients who did not have recurrent PR. The RV ejection fraction corrected for PR increased from 24.6% ± 6.1 to 38.3% ± 12.5 at 7-month follow-up (P = .03 compared with that obtained at baseline) and 38.4% ± 13.1 at 19-month follow-up (P = .86 compared with that obtained at 7-month follow-up) in patients who did have recurrent PR. Moreover, the results of repeated-measures analysis (linear mixed model) showed that the time course of improvement of RV ejection fraction corrected for PR is different (P = .04).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, cardiac MR imaging was used in the follow-up of 25 consecutive adult patients who underwent PVR late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. We found a significant decrease in RV volumes at 7-month follow-up, followed by sustained benefit at 19-month follow-up; however, the individual recovery of RV function varied substantially. Several observations were made that could explain variations in the response of RV function after PVR. Nearly half of the patients had some degree of recurrent PR after surgery. In addition, we observed that the recovery of RV function was hampered by the presence of recurrent PR after valve replacement. The negative effect of PR on RV recovery could not be explained by differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and those without recurrent PR. The surgical procedure during PVR, however, was different between both groups. Patients in whom the RV outflow tract volume was reduced and/or a pericardial patch was used had less chance of developing early recurrent PR. Thus, we speculate that the surgical procedure might affect the recurrence of PR and the recovery of RV function.

RV Dilatation
We found a significant decrease in RV dilatation after PVR. This observation is in accordance with observations of previous researchers, who have found a decrease in RV dilatation of approximately 30% in patients with tetralogy of Fallot after PVR in children (14,20) in follow-up studies performed up to 2 years after surgery. These reports suggest that volume unloading due to elimination of PR may be the most important factor. In these studies, however, no distinction was made between patients with and those without recurrent PR.

In our population, the time course of decrease of RV dilation was influenced by the recurrence of PR. Furthermore, if recurrent PR was detected at early follow-up, decrease of RV volumes was limited, and little additional decrease of RV volumes was found at 17-month follow-up. Moreover, the late recurrence of PR coincided with a late increase of RV volumes, although the initial decrease of RV volumes was in the normal range. This finding supports the concept that recurrent PR has a detrimental effect on RV function after PVR.

RV Systolic Function
RV systolic function was measured with the RV ejection fraction and the RV end-systolic volume. Systolic performance was corrected for the degree of PR, as previously reported (13). In a previous study by Bove et al (20), a significant reduction of RV dilatation after PVR was found in 11 patients with tetralogy of Fallot; only a marginal increase in the EF was found, although most patients reported a subjective improvement in exercise tolerance. The improvement of systolic function was possibly obscured in the study by Bove et al (20), because RV ejection fraction was not corrected for the change in loading conditions.

In the present study, both RV dilatation and systolic function improved along the same time course. In case of recurrence of PR after PVR, there is less decrease of RV volume and subsequently, less improvement of systolic function when compared with that in patients who did not experience recurrence of PR. Thus, we speculate that improvement of systolic function is a direct consequence of volume unloading after valve replacement.

Recurrent PR after PVR
The recurrence of PR after PVR has been reported by several other authors. Therrien et al (15) studied 70 patients before and after PVR by using echocardiography. In their study, 92% of patients had at least moderate PR before surgery. In 11 (20%) patients, at least moderate recurrent PR was found after PVR. Warner et al (14) studied 16 patients with tetralogy of Fallot who underwent PVR for moderate or severe PR. After PVR, four patients had moderate recurrent PR. All four had a unilateral or bilateral stenosis of the pulmonary artery branches, as indicated by postoperative pulmonary artery pressure gradients of more than 20 mm Hg, which indicates that residual pulmonary stenosis after surgery might induce the recurrence of PR. In our study, five patients had significant pulmonary stenosis before PVR, but all were treated during subsequent surgery; therefore, we conclude that pulmonary stenosis does not contribute to the recurrence of PR.

Causes for recurrent PR are largely unknown. Different mechanisms could play a role in the early and late recurrence of PR. We believe that early recurrent PR is likely due to surgical technical factors, such as distortion of the homograft at implantation. Distortion may be caused by an imperfect fit of the graft when the RV outflow tract diameter and homograft diameter show a substantial discrepancy in size. We propose the hypothesis that failure to reduce a grossly enlarged RV outflow tract may result in lack of central leaflet coaptation and subsequent regurgitation. The detrimental role of akinesia or aneurysm formation in the RV outflow track of RV dilatation and systolic function, independent of the presence of PR, has recently been shown by Davlouros et al (11). By using a small RV outflow tract patch (autologous or xenopericardium), the adaptation of the homograft may be improved in some cases. Perioperative reduction of the RV outflow tract was performed in four of our patients, and the fact that none of them had residual or early recurrent PR supports this hypothesis. Furthermore, of the 10 patients who received a pericardial patch to obtain a better fit between the RV outflow tract and the homograft, early recurrent PR was found in only one.

In our study, one patient showed deterioration of RV function and validity after PVR. In this patient, a mismatch between the grossly enlarged RV outflow tract and the homograft led to severe recurrent PR shortly after PVR. During a PVR procedure that was performed 2 years after initial PVR, the RV outflow tract volume was significantly reduced. In the first 6 months after this second PVR, recurrent PR was not found, and RV function was greatly improved in this patient.

The mechanism of late recurrent PR might be different from that of early recurrent PR. Oei et al (21) reported that the insertion of allograft valve conduits in both children and adults leads to an increase of T-lymphocyte precursor cells with a potentially damaging effect toward the heart valve homograft. Immunologic mechanisms of homograft dysfunction seem to occur mainly in small infants, whereas degenerative processes in homografts of adult patients are less related to immunologically mediated inflammatory responses. Slow calcific graft degeneration due to fiber rupture and infiltration of several blood components and calcium seems to be the predominant mechanism in adults (22,23).

Limitations
Since patients were not randomized before surgery, definite conclusions on the relationship between surgical technique and recurrence of PR cannot be made. Furthermore, longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of recurrent PR on RV function and overall validity and the possible need for additional surgery. A multicenter study with a large patient group and long follow-up could provide more insight into the factors that influence recovery of RV function after PVR.

PVR in adults with tetralogy of Fallot who have moderate to severe PR leads to a rapid recovery of RV function. At midterm follow-up as much as 19 months after surgery, RV function recovery is sustained in the majority of patients; however, recurrence of PR after PVR appears to reduce recovery of RV systolic function. Baseline characteristics do not predict recovery of RV function, whereas surgical techniques appear to be relevant to prevent recurrence of PR and thereby may affect recovery of RV function.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: PR = pulmonary regurgitation, PVR = pulmonary valve replacement, RV = right ventricle

Authors stated no financial relationship to disclose.

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, all authors; study concepts and design, all authors; literature research, A.v.S.; clinical studies, A.v.S., A.d.R.; data acquisition, all authors; data analysis/interpretation, A.v.S., H.W.V., A.d.R., M.G.H.; statistical analysis, A.v.S.; manuscript preparation and definition of intellectual content, all authors; manuscript editing, A.v.S., A.d.R.; manuscript revision/review and final version approval, all authors


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Lillehei CW, Varco RL, Cohen M, et al. The first open heart corrections of tetralogy of Fallot: a 26–31 year follow-up of 106 patients. Ann Surg 1986; 204:490-502.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Murphy JG, Gersh BJ, Mair DD, et al. Long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:593-599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Waien SA, Liu PP, Ross BL, Williams WG, Webb GD, McLaughlin PR. Serial follow-up of adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:295-300.[Abstract]
  4. Nollert G, Fischlein T, Bouterwek S, Bohmer C, Klinner W, Reichart B. Long-term survival in patients with repair of tetralogy of Fallot: 36-year follow-up of 490 survivors of the first year after surgical repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:1374-1383.[Abstract]
  5. Therrien J, Siu SC, McLaughlin PR, Liu PP, Williams WG, Webb GD. Pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: are we operating too late? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:1670-1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zahka KG, Horneffer PJ, Rowe SA, et al. Long-term valvular function after total repair of tetralogy of Fallot: relation to ventricular arrhythmias. Circulation 1988; 78(5 pt 2):III14-III19.
  7. Ebert PA. Second operations for pulmonary stenosis or insufficiency after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50:637-640.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Marie PY, Marcon F, Brunotte F, et al. Right ventricular overload and induced sustained ventricular tachycardia in operatively "repaired" tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69:785-789.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Wessel HU, Cunningham WJ, Paul MH, Bastanier CK, Muster AJ, Idriss FS. Exercise performance in tetralogy of Fallot after intracardiac repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 80:582-593.[Abstract]
  10. Rowe SA, Zahka KG, Manolio TA, Horneffer PJ, Kidd L. Lung function and pulmonary regurgitation limit exercise capacity in postoperative tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:461-466.[Abstract]
  11. Davlouros PA, Kilner PJ, Hornung TS, et al. Right ventricular function in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: detrimental role of right ventricular outflow aneurysms or akinesia and adverse right-to-left ventricular interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:2044-2052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. d’Udekem Y, Ovaert C, Grandjean F, et al. Tetralogy of Fallot: transannular and right ventricular patching equally affect late functional status. Circulation 2000; 102(19 suppl 3):III116-III122.
  13. Vliegen HW, Van Straten A, de Roos A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging to assess the hemodynamic effects of pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation 2002; 106:1703-1707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Warner KG, Anderson JE, Fulton DR, Payne DD, Geggel RL, Marx GR. Restoration of the pulmonary valve reduces right ventricular volume overload after previous repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation 1993; 88(5 pt 2):II189-II197.
  15. Therrien J, Siu SC, Harris L, et al. Impact of pulmonary valve replacement on arrhythmia propensity late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation 2001; 103:2489-2494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. van der Geest RJ, Reiber JH. Quantification in cardiac MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:602-608.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Pattynama PM, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Van Voorthuisen AE. Evaluation of cardiac function with magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1994; 128:595-607.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, van der Velde EA, van der Geest RJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Reproducibility of MRI-derived measurements of right ventricular volumes and myocardial mass. Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 13:53-63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. van der Geest RJ, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Reiber JH. Quantitative analysis of cardiovascular MR images. Int J Card Imaging 1997; 13:247-258.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Bove EL, Kavey RE, Byrum CJ, Sondheimer HM, Blackman MS, Thomas FD. Improved right ventricular function following late pulmonary valve replacement for residual pulmonary insufficiency or stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90:50-55.[Abstract]
  21. Oei FB, Welters MJ, Knoop CJ, et al. Circulating donor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes with high avidity for donor human leukocyte antigens in pediatric and adult cardiac allograft valved conduit recipients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18:466-472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Koolbergen DR, Hazekamp MG, de Heer E, et al. The pathology of fresh and cryopreserved homograft heart valves: an analysis of forty explanted homograft valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124:689-697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mitchell RN, Jonas RA, Schoen FJ. Structure-function correlations in cryopreserved allograft cardiac valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:S108-S112.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
S. Chua, R. A. Levine, C. Yosefy, M. D. Handschumacher, J. Chu, A. Qureshi, J. Neary, T.-T. Ton-Nu, M. Fu, C. J. Wu, et al.
Assessment of right ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography improves accuracy and decreases interobserver variability compared with conventional two-dimensional views
Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2009; 10(5): 619 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
H B Grotenhuis, L J M Kroft, S G C van Elderen, J J M Westenberg, J Doornbos, M G Hazekamp, H W Vliegen, J Ottenkamp, and A de Roos
Right ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in arterial switch patients without pulmonary artery stenosis
Heart, December 1, 2007; 93(12): 1604 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L. Coats, S. Khambadkone, G. Derrick, M. Hughes, R. Jones, B. Mist, D. Pellerin, J. Marek, J. E. Deanfield, P. Bonhoeffer, et al.
Physiological consequences of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: the different behaviour of volume- and pressure-overloaded ventricles
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2007; 28(15): 1886 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Oosterhof, A. van Straten, H. W. Vliegen, F. J. Meijboom, A. P.J. van Dijk, A. M. Spijkerboer, B. J. Bouma, A. H. Zwinderman, M. G. Hazekamp, A. de Roos, et al.
Preoperative Thresholds for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients With Corrected Tetralogy of Fallot Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Circulation, July 31, 2007; 116(5): 545 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
T. Oosterhof, H. W Vliegen, F. J Meijboom, A. H Zwinderman, B. Bouma, and B. J M Mulder
Long-term effect of pulmonary valve replacement on QRS duration in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot
Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 506 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. R. Henkens, A. van Straten, M. J. Schalij, M. G. Hazekamp, A. de Roos, E. E. van der Wall, and H. W. Vliegen
Predicting Outcome of Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Adult Tetralogy of Fallot Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 907 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. Oosterhof, F. J. Meijboom, H. W. Vliegen, M. G. Hazekamp, A. H. Zwinderman, B. J. Bouma, A. P.J. van Dijk, and B. J.M. Mulder
Long-term follow-up of homograft function after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot
Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2006; 27(12): 1478 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P A Davlouros, K Niwa, G Webb, and M A Gatzoulis
The right ventricle in congenital heart disease
Heart, April 1, 2006; 92(suppl_1): i27 - i38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. I. Norton, C. Tong, R. B. J. Glass, and J. C. Nielsen
Cardiac MR Imaging Assessment Following Tetralogy of Fallot Repair
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 197 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. van Straten, H. W. Vliegen, H. J. Lamb, S. D. Roes, E. E. van der Wall, M. G. Hazekamp, and A. de Roos
Time Course of Diastolic and Systolic Function Improvement After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Adult Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 18, 2005; 46(8): 1559 - 1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Kuehne, B. K. Gleason, M. Saeed, D. Turner, J. Weil, D. F. Teitel, C. B. Higgins, and P. Moore
Combined pulmonary stenosis and insufficiency preserves myocardial contractility in the developing heart of growing swine at midterm follow-up
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1422 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. P. Graham Jr
The Year in Congenital Heart Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1887 - 1899.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Straten, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Roos, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Straten, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Roos, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE