Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 24, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2341031984
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2341031984v1
234/1/218    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nimsky, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fahlbusch, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nimsky, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fahlbusch, R.
(Radiology 2005;234:218-225.)
© RSNA, 2004


Neuroradiology

Intraoperative Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging: Shifting of White Matter Tracts during Neurosurgical Procedures—Initial Experience1

Christopher Nimsky, MD, Oliver Ganslandt, MD, Peter Hastreiter, PhD, Ruopeng Wang, PhD, Thomas Benner, PhD, A. Gregory Sorensen, MD and Rudolf Fahlbusch, MD

1 From the Department of Neurosurgery, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany (C.N., O.G., P.H., R.F.); and Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (R.W., T.B., A.G.S.). Received December 8, 2003; revision requested February 13, 2004; revision received February 27; accepted March 29. Supported in part by grants from the U.S. Public Health Service (P41-RR14075, M01-RR001066, NS-038477) and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Address correspondence to C.N. (e-mail: nimsky@nch.imed.uni-erlangen.de).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the location of white matter tracts with diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) during neurosurgical procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical committee approval and signed informed consent were obtained. A 1.5-T magnetic resonance imager with an adapted rotating surgical table that is placed in a radiofrequency-shielded operating theater was used for pre- and intraoperative imaging. DTI was performed by applying an echo-planar imaging sequence with six diffusion directions in 38 patients (20 female patients, 18 male patients; age range, 7–77 years; mean age, 45.6 years) who were undergoing surgery (35 craniotomy and three burr hole procedures). Color-encoded maps of fractional anisotropy were generated by depicting white matter tracts. A rigid registration algorithm was used to compare pre- and intraoperative images.

RESULTS: Intraoperative DTI was technically feasible in all patients, and no major image distortions occurred in the areas of interest. Pre- and intraoperative color-encoded maps of fractional anisotropy could be registered; these maps depicted marked and highly variable shifting of white matter tracts during neurosurgical procedures. In the 27 patients who underwent brain tumor resection, white matter tract shifting ranged from an inward shift of 8 mm to an outward shift of 15 mm (mean shift ± standard deviation, outward shift of 2.5 mm ± 5.8). In 16 (59%) of 27 patients, outward shifting was detected; in eight (30%), inward shifting was detected. In eight patients who underwent temporal lobe resections for drug-resistant epilepsy, shifting was only inward and ranged from 2 to 14 mm (9 mm ± 3.3). In two of the three patients who underwent burr hole procedures, outward shifting occurred.

CONCLUSION: Intraoperative DTI can depict shifting of major white matter tracts that is caused by surgical intervention.

© RSNA, 2004


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has attracted interest in recent years. The ability to objectively determine the extent of resection during surgery is highly advantageous. For example, if a resection is incomplete, it is possible to extend the resection during the same surgical procedure, which results in removal of tumor residues that were missed primarily (16). Increased resection margins, however, may result in increased postoperative neurologic deficits due to possible damage of eloquent brain areas, such as the precentral gyrus and pyramidal tract, which concern motor function (6). Thus, intraoperative MR imaging was combined with application of navigation systems (7).

The integration of functional data obtained with magnetoencephalography and functional MR imaging into the navigational data sets for identification of eloquent brain areas allowed their preservation, which resulted in reduced postoperative neurologic deficits (79). These modalities, however, could be used only in the identification of the functional areas at the cortical surface. To avoid postoperative neurologic deficits, it is also necessary to preserve major white matter tracts, such as the pyramidal tract. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was used to approximate the location of the pyramidal tract (10); these data were integrated into preoperative data sets, which were then used for navigation, so that the pyramidal tract could be identified during brain tumor resection (11,12).

Diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) can assist resolution of the dominant fiber orientation in each voxel element by aiding in the measurement of the self-diffusion properties (eg, brownian motion of water molecules). Diffusion is anisotropic (eg, orientation dependent) in areas with a strong aligned microstructure. The direction of greatest diffusion measured with DTI parallels the dominant orientation of the tissue structure in each voxel, representing the mean longitudinal direction of axons in white matter tracts (13,14). DTI can be used in the identification of white matter tracts, such as the pyramidal tract, in patients with brain tumors. It may depict the normal course, displacement, or interruption of white matter tracts around a tumor and the widening of fiber bundles due to edema or tumor infiltration (1523).

Advances in imager design, including those due to active magnetic shielding, have made it possible to adapt modern high-field-strength MR imagers to the surgical environment (1,5,24). In our setup, a rotating table that is adapted to the imager simultaneously serves as both the MR table and the surgical table. Surgery is performed with the head placed in the fringe field of the imager at the 0.5-mT line; for intraoperative imaging, the table is rotated into the imager (24,25). The successful integration of a high-field-strength imager into the operating room allowed us to consider the intraoperative application of DTI. Thus, the purpose of our study was to prospectively evaluate the localization of white matter tracts with DTI during neurosurgical procedures.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Population
From January to June 2003, DTI data were acquired pre- and intraoperatively in 38 patients (20 female patients, 18 male patients; age range, 7–77 years; mean age, 45.6 years). Among these patients, 35 had undergone craniotomy, and three had undergone burr hole procedures. Histopathologic examination revealed gliomas in 25 patients (World Health Organization grade I glioma, three patients; grade II glioma, two patients; grade III glioma, seven patients; grade IV glioma, 13 patients), meningiomas in two patients, and metastasis, cavernoma, and glial scarring with regressive changes in one patient each. In eight additional patients, tailored temporal lobe surgery was performed for pharmacoresistant epilepsy; among these patients, histopathologic examination revealed Ammon horn sclerosis in six and polymicrogyria and signs of gliosis in one each. The ethical committee at the University Erlangen-Nuremberg approved our study and the use of intraoperative high-field-strength MR imaging. Signed informed consent was provided by each patient. In children, appropriate family members provided informed consent.

Operating Room Setup
The 1.5-T MR imager (Magnetom Sonata Maestro Class; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) is installed in an operating room with radiofrequency shielding. It is a high-field-strength MR imager, with a superconductive 1.5-T magnet that has a length of 160 cm and an inner bore diameter of 60 cm. This imager is equipped with a gradient system with a field strength of up to 40 mT/m (effective field strength, 69 mT/m) and a slew rate of up to 200 T/m/sec (effective slew rate, 346 T/m/sec). A surgical table (Trumpf, Saalfeld, Germany) that can be rotated is adapted to the imager to allow for a special surgical MR tabletop. This surgical table can be locked into various positions. The principal surgical position is 160°, with the head of the patient at the 0.5-mT line. For anesthesia, MR-compatible ventilation and monitoring equipment are used (26). An MR-compatible four-point head holder, which is made of fiberglass and reinforced with plastic, is integrated into the head coil for head fixation. The upper part of the head coil may be sterilized with plasma sterilization. Sterile adapters placed onto the lower part of the head coil assure the possibility of sterile draping (24,25).

Timing of intraoperative MR imaging was decided by the neurosurgeon (C.N. and R.F.). MR imaging was performed either when the surgeon had the impression that the goal of surgery was met (eg, complete tumor resection) or when a marked brain shift necessitated updating of the navigation system (27,28). Prior to imaging, the surgical resection cavity was covered with a piece of gelfoam, and sterile draping was placed over the coil after the sterile upper part of the head coil was locked.

MR Imaging and Data Processing
We used a single-shot spin-echo diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging sequence (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 9200/86; matrix size, 128 x 128; field of view, 240 mm; section thickness, 1.9 mm; bandwidth, 1502 Hz/pixel). This sequence is based on a balanced diffusion gradient design that strongly minimizes eddy-current artifacts when compared with a single refocused design. Diffusion weighting of 1000 sec/mm2 (high b value) was used. One null image (low b value of 0 sec/mm2) and six diffusion-weighted images were obtained with the diffusion-encoding gradients directed along the (±1, 1, 0), (±1, 0, 1), and (1, ±1, 0) axes. The voxel size was 1.9 x 1.9 x 1.9 mm, and 60 sections with no intersection gap were measured. By applying five averages, total DTI measurement required 5 minutes 31 seconds.

DTI maps were calculated by using the DTI task card, version 1.60—which was developed at the Magnetic Resonance Center of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston—and a 1.5-T MR imager with imaging software (MRease N4_VA21B under syngo VB10I; Siemens Medical Solutions). Diffusion-tensor information was then represented as color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and three maps of each eigenvalue of the diffusion tensor. Color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps were generated by mapping the principal eigenvector components into red, green, and blue color channels, which were weighted with fractional anisotropy. By assuming that the patient is lying in the supine position and his or her head is not tilted, color mapping depicts white matter tracts oriented in an anterior-to-posterior direction as green, in a left-to-right direction as red, and in a superior-to-inferior direction as blue (2931). Furthermore, representations of the diffusion tensor as boxes or ellipsoids were possible, providing an intuitive interpretation of eigenvectors and eigenvalues. The eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue indicates the predominant orientation in a given voxel. The color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps of the principal eigenvector (eg, the eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue) were used for further evaluation.

Pre- and intraoperative images were registered with image fusion software (VectorVision2 Planning 1.3; BrainLab, Heimstetten, Germany), which is used to perform semiautomatic rigid registration. For example, after rough alignment by the user, images are registered with software by using a rigid registration algorithm that applies an intensity-based pyramidal approach and uses mutual information, with subpixel registration accuracy (32,33). After registration, the images could be displayed side by side or in an overlay mode, with adjustable weighting of the corresponding images. This allowed visual confirmation of the registration. Furthermore, Amira 3.0 software (Indeed Visual Concept, Berlin, Germany) was used to apply a grid scale, which allowed us to measure the displacement of white matter tracts after pre- and intraoperative images had been registered. For better visualization, the displaced major white matter tracts were segmented manually in consensus (C.N. and O.G., with 14 and 12 years of experience, respectively, with brain MR imaging); thereafter, pre- and intraoperative contours of white matter tracts were displayed with the grid scale.

In 24 patients (22 were undergoing tumor resections and two were undergoing a burr hole procedure), the pyramidal tract was evaluated; in six (five were undergoing tumor resections and one was undergoing a burr hole procedure), the corpus callosum was evaluated; and in eight patients undergoing temporal lobe resection for drug-resistant epilepsy, the optic tract was evaluated. The maximum intraoperative shift of white matter tracts was measured. Positive or negative values were assigned according to the direction of the shift, which was referred to the craniotomy opening. A positive value was assigned if movement was toward the surface (eg, swelling), and a negative value was assigned if movement was inward (27).

Data were summarized in three patient groups: those undergoing brain tumor resection, those undergoing burr hole procedures, and those undergoing temporal lobe resection for treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. In a selected illustrative case, a DTI measurement was obtained at 3-month follow-up and compared with the preoperative image. By assuming that the brain hemisphere opposite the lesion is not much affected by the brain shift, the position of the pyramidal tract in the region of the internal capsule of the unaffected hemisphere was compared between the registered pre- and intraoperative images. The maximum distance was measured in each patient as an estimate for the registration accuracy.

The pre- and intraoperative color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps were displayed during surgery, so that the neurosurgeon could adapt his surgical strategy and account for the actual location of major white matter tracts. All procedures were analyzed for complications related directly to the imaging procedure. Furthermore, a follow-up neurologic examination was performed on the day after surgery and at discharge. Each patient’s postoperative status was compared with his or her preoperative status, and patient records were reviewed for late complications, such as wound infections. Recurrence of bleeding, neurologic deficits, any accidents due to the magnetic field, and all complications, such as wound infections, that necessitated additional surgery were considered major complications.

Technical Issues
All DTI measurements were technically feasible. Image distortion caused by the head fixation pins did not interfere with visualization of the pyramidal tract and other major fiber tract systems near the lesion in which surgery was performed. The open skull did not result in major image distortion. A challenge of intraoperative DTI is that the head is not always in a standard position. For example, if a lesion is located in the temporal lobe, a horizontal or tilted head position is necessary during surgery, so that the color encoding is not the same in pre- and intraoperative measurements. This problem could be solved either by measuring preoperative images obtained after induction of anesthesia and head fixation, so that pre- and intraoperative head positions were identical, or by changing the color encoding scheme in case of a well-defined head rotation (eg, 90° rotation).

A new version of the DTI task card software allows arbitrary section orientations and diffusion gradient direction to be taken into account. A calculation time of about 30 seconds for the color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps was needed so that all postprocessing could be performed intraoperatively. Image registration and calculation of maximum shifting added about 5 minutes.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The maximum intraoperative shifting of white matter tracts ranged from an inward shift of 14 mm to an outward shift of 15 mm in patients undergoing brain tumor resection, a burr hole procedure, or temporal lobe resection for drug-resistant epilepsy. The maximum distance between the pyramidal tracts of the unaffected hemisphere of registered pre- and intraoperative images, which served as an estimate for registration accuracy, was less than 2.5 mm in all patients.

In the 27 patients with brain tumor who were undergoing craniotomy, we observed an outward shift during surgery in 16 (59%) and an inward shift during surgery in eight (30%). In the three remaining patients (11%), no intraoperative displacement was detected. The shift ranged from an inward shift of 8 mm to an outward shift of 15 mm (mean ± standard deviation, outward shift of 2.5 ± 5.8 mm). In two of the three patients who underwent the burr hole procedure, marked outward shifting of 2 and 6 mm occurred. This shift was due to volume reduction of cystic lesions during the burr hole procedure; thus, displacement of white matter tracts resulted.

Figures 13 show images obtained in a 29-year-old man with a large grade III right temporoparietal oligoastrocytoma, which resulted in distinct displacement of the pyramidal tract to the midline. During tumor removal, repeated imaging was performed, which depicted outward shifting of the pyramidal tract (Fig 2). Comparison of the first and last intraoperative images showed an outward shift of 13 mm. Compared with the preoperative image, even an outward shift of 15 mm was detectable. In the postoperative period, the pyramidal tract nearly regained its normal position; thus, the comparison of preoperative data with data obtained at 3-month follow-up revealed a displacement of 20 mm. A patient with a glioma in the temporal lobe, which resembled the tumor seen in Figures 13 with a displacement of the pyramidal tract to the midline, demonstrates the opposite behavior, with a further 6-mm inward shift of the pyramidal tract after tumor removal (Fig 4). Figure 5 shows the displacement of the corpus callosum, which resolves nearly completely after tumor removal, in another patient. This figure also allows us to estimate the satisfying registration accuracy of pre- and intraoperative DTI data, since the segmented structures overlap well in the posterior portion of the corpus callosum. The corpus callosum is distant to the surgical site; thus, it is not influenced by brain shift.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. MR images obtained in a 29-year-old man with a grade III right temporoparietal oligoastrocytoma. A, Transverse T2-weighted MR image depicts marked midline shift (6490/98). B, Corresponding transverse color-encoded fractional anisotropy map obtained with DTI. Imaging parameters were as follows: 9200/86, high b value of 1000 sec/mm2, and one null image and six diffusion-weighted images were obtained.

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Images obtained with the same imaging parameters in the same patient as in Figure 1. A-C, Intraoperative coronal color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps obtained with DTI show marked displacement of the pyramidal tract (blue portion of images), with ongoing resection of the tumor. A distinct 13-mm outward shift of the pyramidal tract can be seen. The corpus callosum is green as a result of the horizontal positioning of the head during surgery. D, Overlay of the segmented pyramidal tract. Red, gray, and black lines indicate first, second, and third intraoperative measurements, respectively.

 


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Images obtained with the same imaging parameters in the same patient as in Figures 1 and 2. Coronal color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps obtained with DTI before surgery (A) and at 3-month follow-up (B) show how the displaced pyramidal tract seen in A, moves back to its regular position after tumor removal (total outward displacement, 20 mm). C, Overlay of the segmented pyramidal tract. Red and black lines indicate pre- and postoperative measurements, respectively.

 


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Images obtained in a 61-year-old woman with a grade IV right temporal glioblastoma. A 6-mm inward shift of the pyramidal tract occured after tumor resection. Pre- (A) and intraoperative (B) coronal color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps obtained with DTI after the head was fixed in a horizontal position. Imaging parameters were as follows: 9200/86 and high b value of 1000 sec/mm2; one null image and six diffusion-weighted MR images were obtained. C, Overlay of the segmented pyramidal tract. Red and black lines indicate pre- and postoperative measurements, respectively.

 


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. A, Pre- and, B, postoperative sagittal color-encoded fractional anisotropy maps obtained with DTI in a 68-year-old woman with grade IV left frontal glioblastoma with marked impression of the corpus callosum, which resolved after tumor removal (outward shift of 9 mm). Imaging parameters were as follows: 9200/86 and high b value of 1000 sec/mm2; one null image and six diffusion-weighted MR images were obtained. C, Overlay of the segmented corpus callosum. Red and black lines indicate pre- and postoperative measurements, respectively.

 
In all eight of the patients undergoing tailored temporal lobe resections for drug-resistant epilepsy, an inward shift was observed. This shift is mainly due to the opening of the ventricular system in all of these patients. The inward shift ranged from 2 to 14 mm (mean, 9 mm ± 3.3). Figure 6 depicts inward shift of optic radiation that was caused by temporal lobe resection.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. A, Pre- and, B, postoperative transverse color-encoded fractional anisotropy map obtained with DTI in a 38-year-old man with drug-resistant epilepsy, in whom tailored temporal lobe resection was performed. Imaging parameters were as follows: 9200/86 and high b value of 1000 sec/mm2; one null image and six diffusion-weighted MR images were obtained. After resection, a marked inward shift of 12 mm occured, with distinct displacement of optic radiation. C, Overlay of the segmented optic radiation. Red and black lines indicate pre- and postoperative measurements, respectively.

 
We did not encounter any major complications due to intraoperative MR imaging, and there was no wound infection or recurrence of bleeding. No patient developed new neurologic deficits due to tumor resection. In five patients, a distinct preoperative paresis improved after surgery.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
White matter tracts may not only be displaced by tumors but also infiltrated by them. DTI is an effective tool for delineating the effects of a tumor on nearby white matter tracts (17,22,23). To our knowledge, it is not yet established whether resection of fibers that appear to be anatomically intact at DTI but are located in areas of the brain that appear to be abnormal will result in subtle postoperative neurologic deficits (22). There is, however, no doubt that a resection that does not preserve prominent fiber bundles (eg, the pyramidal tract, which can be delineated reliably with DTI), will result in distinct postoperative neurologic deficits.

MR imaging is implemented in a variety of neurosurgical operating theaters for intraoperative imaging with systems of various configurations and field strengths (16). Intraoperative MR imaging is used mainly to delineate the extent of a resection and monitor surgical complications; lesion localization is possible when MR imaging is used as a navigational device. To our knowledge, Mamata et al (34) were the first to report the possibility of using line-scan diffusion imaging and a 0.5-T interventional MR imaging system to detect intraoperative changes in fiber orientation that were caused by surgically induced brain deformation.

We applied pre- and intraoperative DTI in 38 patients by using a 1.5-T MR imaging system, which was adapted to the neurosurgical operating room environment (24,25). Despite the open skull, intraoperative DTI was possible. No major image distortion occurred in the areas of interest near the resection border. Only the head fixation pins, which are made of titanium, produced major susceptibility artifacts, which resulted in image distortion near the head fixation; however, registration of pre- and intraoperative images was not impaired. The application of alternative imaging methods for DTI may solve this problem (3537).

Registration of pre- and intraoperative DTI data sets showed a marked individually unpredictable shifting of major white matter tracts; this shift was due to bulk removal of tumor or functionally abnormal brain tissue at surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. Distinct intraoperative shifting may occur in patients who underwent craniotomy and burr hole procedures. In patients with nonlesional epilepsy who are undergoing tailored temporal lobe resections, the ventricular system is routinely opened; thus, the loss of cerebrospinal fluid results in inward shifting of the brain. Accordingly, in all patients, inward shift of the optic radiation was measured; however, the extent of the inward shift was quite variable and ranged from 2 to 14 mm. In patients undergoing brain tumor resection, the variability was much greater and ranged from an outward shift of 15 mm to an inward shift of 8 mm. In 59% of these patients, an outward movement occurred; in 30%, an inward movement occurred.

Regarding the accuracy of measurement of the extent of white matter shifting, there might be a certain bias toward overestimation of brain shift because of the manual segmentation process. It should be noted, however, that the overall extent of shifting of major white matter tracts, as depicted by DTI, and the unpredictable direction and interindividual variability of shifting (mean resection of brain tumors ± standard deviation, outward shift of 2.5 mm ± 5.8) corresponds well to previous data pertaining to outward brain shift of the deep tumor margin (27,38), which was reported to be approximately 4.4 mm ± 6.8 (27). These data were already used to emphasize the fact that navigation systems that rely on only preoperative data lose accuracy during ongoing surgery. Thus, at the critical steps of tumor resection (eg, reaching the deep margin, which may be close or even inside important white matter tracts), the navigation system cannot be used for reliable guidance.

Until now, integration of functional data from magnetoencephalography and functional MR imaging leading to functional neuronavigation were used only to identify eloquent brain areas at the cortical surface (8,9,39). Thus, integration of DTI data into neuronavigation systems that depict the location of the pyramidal tract is highly relevant. First attempts with diffusion-weighted MR images in a stereotactic setting were implemented to prevent damaging of deep-seated eloquent structures (11,12). As illustrated in our study, marked and unpredictable shifting of deep brain structures necessitates intraoperative updating of the navigation system if data obtained in white matter tracts is to be of use when integrated into navigation systems.

Despite increasingly sophisticated mathematic models used to describe the brain shift phenomenon, the most practical solution to compensate for brain shift is to update the navigation system with intraoperative image data. Until now, we believe this update was an anatomic update only (27,28,40). Functional data obtained with magnetoencephalography and functional MR imaging were integrated in the preoperative dataset for functional neuronavigation and were lost with the update procedure. Nonlinear elastic registration and techniques from pattern recognition analysis allowed matching of preoperative MR data sets that contained functional information with intraoperative MR image volumes; this transformed preoperative functional markers into intraoperative image data sets (41,42). Nonrigid registration of preoperative DTI data onto intraoperative MR volume data may be a solution to preserve preoperative information on the course of white matter tracts (43). However, all mathematic models that are used to describe and simulate the brain shift phenomenon and to warp preoperative data to an estimated intraoperative situation are not yet reliable enough to be used in a routine clinical setting. The comparison between model-predicted courses of fiber tracts with the real situation delineated with intraoperative DTI will offer a possibility to validate and refine the mathematic models.

A limitation of this study is that distortions of intraoperative images at the cortical surface that were caused by the open skull may have influenced the evaluation to a certain extent. Thus, the application of nonlinear registration algorithms, measurement of field maps that describe image distortions, and other sequence techniques that are not so distortion sensitive will be investigated in the future. Nonstandard head positioning at surgery caused different color encoding between images obtained with pre- and intraoperative DTI in some patients, and it complicated the comparison of images obtained with pre- and intraoperative DTI. Acquisition of preoperative data immediately after anesthesia induction and head fixation allowed us to avoid different color encoding. A semiautomatic segmentation of major white matter tracts on the basis of color thresholds may allow the prevention of errors that are due to a potentially biased manual segmentation procedure.

The use of intraoperative anatomic volume data and DTI measurements in the process of updating the navigation system will allow reliable compensation for brain shift of deep-seated eloquent brain structures, since intraoperative DTI data are used to visualize the actual course of major white matter tracts after surgically induced brain deformation. We hope that intraoperative knowledge of the actual position of white matter tracts will decrease the risk of new postoperative neurologic deficits that are caused by the removal of deep-seated tumor portions near eloquent brain areas, such as the pyramidal tract.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We express special thanks to Edgar Müller, PhD, Theodor Vetter, PhD, and Michael Zwanger, PhD, of Siemens Medical Solutions, for their continuous technical advice and to Stefanie Kreckel, RT, for her technical support in MR imaging.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviation: DTI = diffusion-tensor imaging

Authors stated no financial relationship to disclose.

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, C.N., R.F.; study concepts, C.N., A.G.S., R.F.; study design, C.N., O.G., A.G.S.; literature research, C.N., O.G., P.H.; clinical studies, C.N., O.G., P.H., R.F.; data acquisition, C.N., O.G., P.H.; data analysis/interpretation, C.N., O.G., R.W., T.B., A.G.S.; statistical analysis, C.N., P.H.; manuscript preparation, C.N.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, all authors; manuscript editing, C.N.; manuscript revision/review, C.N., O.G., R.W., T.B., A.G.S.; manuscript final version approval, all authors


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hall WA, Liu H, Martin AJ, Pozza CH, Maxwell RE, Truwit CL. Safety, efficacy, and functionality of high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2000; 46:632-642.[Medline]
  2. Lewin JS. Interventional MR imaging: concepts, systems, and applications in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:735-748.[Free Full Text]
  3. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Tomandl B, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging for intraoperative use in neurosurgery: a 5 year experience. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2690-2703.[Medline]
  4. Schwartz RB, Hsu L, Wong TZ, et al. Intraoperative MR imaging guidance for intracranial neurosurgery: experience with the first 200 cases. Radiology 1999; 211:477-488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sutherland GR, Kaibara T, Louw D, Hoult DI, Tomanek B, Saunders J. A mobile high-field magnetic resonance system for neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 1999; 91:804-813.[Medline]
  6. Wirtz CR, Knauth M, Staubert A, et al. Clinical evaluation and follow-up results for intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2000; 46:1112-1122.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Kober H, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging combined with neuronavigation: a new concept. Neurosurgery 2001; 48:1082-1091.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Kober H, et al. Integration of functional magnetic resonance imaging supported by magnetoencephalography in functional neuronavigation. Neurosurgery 1999; 44:1249- 1256.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R, Nimsky C, et al. Functional neuronavigation with magnetoencephalography: outcome in 50 patients with lesions around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 1999; 91:73-79.[Medline]
  10. Inoue T, Shimizu H, Yoshimoto T. Imaging the pyramidal tract in patients with brain tumors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1999; 101:4-10.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Coenen VA, Krings T, Mayfrank L, et al. Three-dimensional visualization of the pyramidal tract in a neuronavigation system during brain tumor surgery: first experiences and technical note. Neurosurgery 2001; 49:86-93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Kamada K, Houkin K, Takeuchi F, et al. Visualization of the eloquent motor system by integration of MEG, functional, and anisotropic diffusion-weighted MRI in functional neuronavigation. Surg Neurol 2003; 59:352-362.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Le Bihan D, Van Zijl P. From the diffusion coefficient to the diffusion tensor. NMR Biomed 2002; 15:431-434.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Wiegell MR, Larsson HB, Wedeen VJ. Fiber crossing in human brain depicted with diffusion tensor MR imaging. Radiology 2000; 217:897-903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Beppu T, Inoue T, Shibata Y, et al. Measurement of fractional anisotropy using diffusion tensor MRI in supratentorial astrocytic tumors. J Neurooncol 2003; 63:109-116.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Lu S, Ahn D, Johnson G, Cha S. Peritumoral diffusion tensor imaging of high-grade gliomas and metastatic brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24:937-941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Mori S, Frederiksen K, van Zijl PC, et al. Brain white matter anatomy of tumor patients evaluated with diffusion tensor imaging. Ann Neurol 2002; 51:377-380.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Price S, Burnet N, Donovan T,, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of brain tumours at 3T: a potential tool for assessing white matter tract invasion? Clin Radiol 2003; 58:455-462.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Sinha S, Bastin ME, Whittle IR, Wardlaw JM. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23:520-527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tummala RP, Chu RM, Liu H, Truwit CL, Hall WA. Application of diffusion tensor imaging to magnetic-resonance-guided brain tumor resection. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003; 39:39-43.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Wieshmann UC, Clark CA, Symms MR, Franconi F, Barker GJ, Shorvon SD. Reduced anisotropy of water diffusion in structural cerebral abnormalities demonstrated with diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17:1269-1274.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Witwer BP, Moftakhar R, Hasan KM, et al. Diffusion-tensor imaging of white matter tracts in patients with cerebral neoplasm. J Neurosurg 2002; 97:568-575.[Medline]
  23. Yamada K, Kizu O, Mori S, et al. Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227:295-301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R. How to implement high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. In: Lemke H, Vannier M, Inamura K, Farman A, Doi K, Reiber J, eds. CARS 2002. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2002; 139-143.
  25. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, von Keller B, Anker L, Romstöck J, Fahlbusch R. First clinical results of intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging supported by neuronavigation. In: Lemke H, Vannier M, Inamura K, Farman A, Doi K, Reiber J, eds. CARS 2003. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2003; 601-606.
  26. Schmitz B, Nimsky C, Wendel G, et al. Anesthesia during high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: experience with 80 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2003; 15:255-262.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Cerny S, Hastreiter P, Greiner G, Fahlbusch R. Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2000; 47:1070-1080.[Medline]
  28. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P, Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative compensation for brain shift. Surg Neurol 2001; 56:357-365.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Makris N, Worth AJ, Sorensen AG, et al. Morphometry of in vivo human white matter association pathways with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1997; 42:951-962.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C. Color schemes to represent the orientation of anisotropic tissues from diffusion tensor data: application to white matter fiber tract mapping in the human brain. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:526-540.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996; 201:637-648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Studholme C, Hill D, Hawkes D. Automated 3D registration of MR and CT images of the head. Med Image Anal 1996; 1:163-175.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Thevenaz P, Unser M. A pyramid approach to sub-pixel image fusion based on mutual information. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 1996; 1:265-268.
  34. Mamata Y, Mamata H, Nabavi A, et al. Intraoperative diffusion imaging on a 0.5 Tesla interventional scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:115-119.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Bammer R, Auer M, Keeling SL, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot SENSE-EPI. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48:128-136.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Mamata H, Mamata Y, Westin CF, et al. High-resolution line scan diffusion tensor MR imaging of white matter fiber tract anatomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23:67-75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Koch MA, Glauche V, Finsterbusch J, et al. Distortion-free diffusion tensor imaging of cranial nerves and of inferior temporal and orbitofrontal white matter. Neuroimage 2002; 17:497-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Dorward NL, Alberti O, Velani B, et al. Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation. J Neurosurg 1998; 88:656-662.[Medline]
  39. Kober H, Nimsky C, Möller M, Hastreiter P, Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O. Correlation of sensorimotor activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography in presurgical functional imaging: a spatial analysis. Neuroimage 2001; 14:1214-1228.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Nabavi A, Black PM, Gering DT, et al. Serial intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of brain shift. Neurosurgery 2001; 48:787-798.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Hastreiter P, Rezk-Salama C, Nimsky C, Lürig C, Greiner G, Ertl T. Registration techniques for the analysis of the brain shift in neurosurgery. Comput Graph 2000; 24:385-389.[CrossRef]
  42. Wolf M, Vogel T, Weierich P, Niemann H, Nimsky C. Automatic transfer of preoperative fMRI markers into intraoperative MR-images for updating functional neuronavigation. IEICE T Inf Syst 2001; E84-D:1698-1704.
  43. Ruiz-Alzola J, Westin CF, Warfield SK, Alberola C, Maier S, Kikinis R. Nonrigid registration of 3D tensor medical data. Med Image Anal 2002; 6:143-161.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. G. P. Nucifora, R. Verma, S.-K. Lee, and E. R. Melhem
Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging and Tractography: Exploring Brain Microstructure and Connectivity
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 367 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. S. Lewin, S. G. Nour, M. L. Meyers, A. K. Metzger, R. J. Maciunas, M. Wendt, J. L. Duerk, A. Oppelt, and W. R. Selman
Intraoperative MRI with a Rotating, Tiltable Surgical Table: A Time Use Study and Clinical Results in 122 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1096 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
N. Mikuni, T. Okada, R. Enatsu, Y. Miki, S.-i. Urayama, J. A Takahashi, K. Nozaki, H. Fukuyama, and N. Hashimoto
Clinical significance of preoperative fibre-tracking to preserve the affected pyramidal tracts during resection of brain tumours in patients with preoperative motor weakness
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 78(7): 716 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. Stadlbauer, C. Nimsky, S. Gruber, E. Moser, T. Hammen, T. Engelhorn, M. Buchfelder, and O. Ganslandt
Changes in Fiber Integrity, Diffusivity, and Metabolism of the Pyramidal Tract Adjacent to Gliomas: A Quantitative Diffusion Tensor Fiber Tracking and MR Spectroscopic Imaging Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 462 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Stadlbauer, O. Ganslandt, R. Buslei, T. Hammen, S. Gruber, E. Moser, M. Buchfelder, E. Salomonowitz, and C. Nimsky
Gliomas: Histopathologic Evaluation of Changes in Directionality and Magnitude of Water Diffusion at Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 803 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Okada, N. Mikuni, Y. Miki, K.-i. Kikuta, S.-i. Urayama, T. Hanakawa, Y. Fushimi, A. Yamamoto, M. Kanagaki, H. Fukuyama, et al.
Corticospinal Tract Localization: Integration of Diffusion-Tensor Tractography at 3-T MR Imaging with Intraoperative White Matter Stimulation Mapping--Preliminary Results
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 849 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E. Goebell, J. Fiehler, X.-Q. Ding, S. Paustenbach, S. Nietz, O. Heese, T. Kucinski, C. Hagel, M. Westphal, and H. Zeumer
Disarrangement of Fiber Tracts and Decline of Neuronal Density Correlate in Glioma Patients--A Combined Diffusion Tensor Imaging and 1H-MR Spectroscopy Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1426 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Lazar, A.L. Alexander, P.J. Thottakara, B. Badie, and A.S. Field
White Matter Reorganization After Surgical Resection of Brain Tumors and Vascular Malformations
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1258 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2341031984v1
234/1/218    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nimsky, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fahlbusch, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nimsky, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fahlbusch, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE