Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2341041518
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clément, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clément, O.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiology 2005;234:3.)
© RSNA, 2005


Science to Practice

Can We Monitor Cell Therapy with MR Imaging at Clinical Field Strength after Systemic Injection?

Olivier Clément, MD, PhD

Department of Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou and Inserm U 494, School of Medicine Paris 5, Paris 75908, France



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Olivier Clément MD, PhD

 
The Setting

In vivo visualization of transplanted cells (cellular imaging) with noninvasive techniques such as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is of growing interest to radiologists. The aim is to monitor the effectiveness of new cellular therapies and to see how transplanted cells migrate through the body.

Target cells are labeled with superparamagnetic particles that have high T2* properties (1). High-field-strength imaging is usually required to increase contrast and spatial resolution (2). After local injection in the myocardium, for example, labeled cells are easy to visualize because of their high local density (3). However, detection of transplanted cells in a specific organ after systemic injection is more challenging (4). In this issue of Radiology, Daldrup-Link et al (5) describe an elegant way of depicting hematopoietic cells after systemic injection by using a clinical MR imaging system operating at 1.5 T.



View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
 
The Science

Superparamagnetic nanoparticles are currently used for liver imaging and will soon be available for other macrophage-based applications such as imaging lymph nodes or plaque. When used to label cells in vitro, the efficiency depends on the cell type and is generally poor with nonmacrophagic cells. Optimized protocols that use various "transfecting" agents have been developed, notably to label neural and mesenchymal cells (6,7).

Daldrup-Link et al (5) labeled human hematopoietic progenitor cells by means of simple incubation with ferumoxides and by using a new anionic particle and a liposomal transfecting agent. After intravenous injection of (1.0–3.0) x 107 labeled cells into mice, the authors found that the cells migrated to the liver and spleen and gradually homed to bone marrow, as indicated by a marked decline in the femoral signal intensity at 24 and 48 hours. In contrast, simple injection of only contrast agent resulted in a decline of the liver and spleen signal intensity. Similar results were obtained with two contrast agents, and results of precise histologic correlation studies confirmed that the loss of signal intensity in bone marrow was due to homing of labeled cells and not to the release of free particles.

The Practice

Clinical use.—Cellular therapies can be used to replace dead tissue (bone marrow transplantation, mesenchymal cell injection after myocardial infarction, use of neuronal cells in neurodegenerative diseases), to kill cancer cells, or to replace a deficient gene, and also as a diagnostic tool (detection of deep abscesses with labeled leukocytes).

The development of an appropriate imaging technique, with optimized cell labeling and MR imaging conditions, will be useful in all these settings in that it will enable monitoring of the effectiveness of cell transplantation, homing, and differentiation.

Future opportunities and challenges.—The labeling procedure must be nontoxic; that is, it must not affect differentiation or functionality. The use of an existing, well-characterized labeling agent has obvious advantages in this respect. Sensitivity is a major challenge, especially in settings where few therapeutic cells are injected. It will probably be impossible to track single cells, but homing to specific anatomic sites should be detectable with optimized imaging and labeling techniques. The duration of detectability must also be taken into account and will depend on the rate of cell division—from a few weeks for neural cells or hepatocytes to days for rapidly dividing cells.

Summary

Daldrup-Link et al (5), after labeling hematopoietic cells with superparamagnetic particles in vitro and injecting them intravenously into mice, found that specific homing to bone marrow could be observed after 24 and 48 hours by using a clinical magnet and optimized T2*-weighted MR imaging sequences. Further optimization of this technique will allow us to monitor labeled cells injected intravenously for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.

REFERENCES

  1. Wilhelm C, Gazeau F, Billotey C, Bacri JC, Roger J, Pons JN. Interaction of anionic superparamagnetic nanoparticles with cells: kinetic analysis of membrane adsorption and subsequent internalisation. Langmuir 2002; 18:8148-8155.[CrossRef]
  2. Hoehn M, Kustermann E, Blunk J, et al. Monitoring of implanted stem cell migration in vivo: a highly resolved in vivo magnetic resonance imaging investigation of experimental stroke in rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:16267-16272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Garot J, Unterseeh T, Teiger E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of targeted catheter-based implantation of myogenic precursor cells into infarcted left ventricular myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41:1841-1846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Smirnov P, Gazeau F, Lewin M, et al. In vivo cellular imaging of magnetically labelled hybridomas in the spleen with a 1.5 T clinical MRI system. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52:73-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Daldrup-Link HE, Rudelius M, Piontek G, et al. Migration of iron–oxide labeled human hematopoietic progenitor cells in a mouse model: in vivo monitoring with 1.5-T MR imaging equipment. Radiology 2005; 234:197-205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lewin M, Carlesso N, Tung CH, et al. Tat peptide-derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18:410-414.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Bulte JW, Douglas T, Witwer B, et al. Magnetodendrimers allow endosomal magnetic labeling and in vivo tracking of stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:1141-1147.[CrossRef][Medline]

Related Article

Migration of Iron Oxide–labeled Human Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells in a Mouse Model: In Vivo Monitoring with 1.5-T MR Imaging Equipment
Heike E. Daldrup-Link, Martina Rudelius, Guido Piontek, Stephan Metz, Rosalinde Bräuer, Gerlinde Debus, Claire Corot, Jürgen Schlegel, Thomas M. Link, Christian Peschel, Ernst J. Rummeny, and Robert A. J. Oostendorp
Radiology 2005 234: 197-205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clément, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clément, O.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE