Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342031015
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahualli, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahualli, J.
(Radiology 2005;234:549-550.)
© RSNA, 2005


Signs in Imaging

The Target Sign: Bowel Wall1

Jorge Ahualli, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Centro Radiológico Luis Méndez Collado, Muñecas 444, San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán 4000, Argentina. Received June 28, 2003; revision requested September 9; revision received September 23; accepted October 21. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: joahualli@sinectis.com.ar).


    APPEARANCE
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The target sign is seen on contrast material–enhanced computed tomographic (CT) scans of the abdomen. With this sign, the thickened bowel wall demonstrates three layers that comprise a contrast-enhanced inner and outer layer of high attenuation between which is a layer of decreased attenuation (Figs 1, 2) (14).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Diagram shows cross section of bowel wall with three layers of high (inner black layer), low (middle gray layer), and high (outer black layer) attenuation. Together, these layers create a target appearance known as the target sign.

 


View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Transverse CT scan of the abdomen after administration of oral and intravenous contrast material in a 42-year-old man with ischemic colitis. Layers representing target sign grossly correspond to muscularis propria (straight white arrow), submucosa (curved arrow), and mucosa (black arrow).

 

    EXPLANATION
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The target sign is seen with various diseases of the bowel in which submucosal edema, inflammation, or both are present (1). The inner and outer layers of the target sign represent the mucosa and the muscularis propria and/or serosa, respectively, with the high attenuation being a consequence of contrast enhancement (2).

The lower attenuation of the middle layer is believed to result from edema (thought to be the dominant component of this layer) and is assumed to be located in the submucosa (2). The target sign indicates hyperemia in the mucosa and the muscularis propria, serosa, or both with submucosal edema or inflammation (46). It is uncertain, however, whether either layer represents the true histologic boundaries of those structures, particularly the mucosa (2).

The different layer attenuations are better appreciated during the late arterial and early portal venous phases of intravenous contrast material enhancement. This sign may be totally absent during an examination performed without intravenous contrast material, with slower and/or lower volume injections, or with delayed (>2 minutes) intravenous contrast-enhanced CT (1,4).

When submucosal edema is severe, the target sign may be demonstrated at nonenhanced CT (4). The high attenuation of the mucosal layer is best demonstrated when the bowel is distended with water-attenuation contrast material (2).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
At CT, the appearance of a benign intestinal lesion is usually that of circumferential and symmetric thickening of the bowel wall. This thickening usually does not exceed 1 cm from the luminal surface to the serosal surface. Depending on the cause and the severity of the abnormality, the intestinal wall may occasionally be thicker (1–2 cm) (1).

The target sign was reported in patients with Crohn disease, but it has since been observed in patients with other benign entities (1,7). Some diseases with which this sign has been associated include ischemic bowel disease (ischemic enteritis and ischemic colitis), intramural intestinal hemorrhage, idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis), vascular disorders (Henoch-Schönlein purpura), infectious diseases (infectious colitis and pseudomembranous colitis), radiation damage (enteritis and radiation colitis), and bowel edema associated with portal hypertension (1,2,79).

The target sign does not allow a specific diagnosis, but it does allow one to predict that, since the sign uncommonly occurs with malignancy, the thickened bowel wall is most likely caused by inflammatory disease as opposed to neoplasm (1,2,6). A notable exception to this general rule is the occurrence of the target sign in cases of infiltrating scirrhous carcinoma of the rectum (4).

The most common CT finding in bowel ischemia is bowel wall thickening, which is sometimes associated with the target sign (1012). This sign has been well described as an early and nonspecific CT finding of intestinal ischemia (1,9,10,12). In a study by Macari et al (9), it was present in nine of 19 patients (47%) with intestinal ischemia.

Ischemic colitis is considered a form of nonoclusive ischemic disease that is usually seen in older patients and that manifests without a marked sex predilection. Ischemic colitis occurs when the blood flow to the colon is disrupted, usually as a result of hypoperfusion and vasospasm of the sphanchnic arteries (7). This condition is generally suspected on the basis of clinical and CT findings. In a study by Balthazar el al (13), the target sign was present in the affected colonic wall in 13 of 54 patients (24%) with ischemic colitis.

Intramural intestinal hemorrhage is usually diagnosed when CT depicts circumferential and symmetric bowel wall thickening in patients who are undergoing anticoagulation therapy or who have an underlying bleeding diathesis (4). However, the target sign may also be seen in patients with intramural hemorrhage. In another study (9), the target sign was present in seven of 18 bowel segments (39%) with intramural hemorrhage.

At CT, the most frequent finding in inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis) is bowel wall thickening (7). During the acute, noncicatrizing phase of Crohn disease, the small bowel and colon show mural stratification and often have a target appearance. Because the target sign represents submucosal edema, the pathophysiologic basis of this sign is similar in Crohn disease and other entities (6).

Inflamed mucosa and serosa may demonstrate substantial contrast enhancement after the intravenous administration of contrast material, and the intensity of enhancement seems to correlate with the clinical activity of the disease (6,14). When patients with long-standing Crohn disease (chronic phase) develop transmural fibrosis, the target sign is no longer present at intravenous contrast-enhanced CT (4,14,15).

A low-attenuation layer in the bowel wall caused by submucosal fat deposits (known as the fat halo sign) is seen in patients with either ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease (4,7). The lower attenuation of intramural fat can usually be distinguished from the grayer appearance of the target sign (2).

In conclusion, the target sign can be seen at transverse CT of the abdomen after the intravenous administration of contrast material. While nonspecific, the target sign does allow one to predict that the presence of a thickened bowel wall is almost always the result of inflammatory disease.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
My sincere thanks to Luis Méndez Uriburu, MD, for his guidance in the preparation and review of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
A trainee (resident or fellow) wishing to submit a manuscript for Signs in Imaging should first write to the Editor for approval of the sign to be prepared, to avoid duplicate preparation of the same sign.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Balthazar EJ. CT of the gastrointestinal tract: principles and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156:23-32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wittenberg J, Harisinghani MG, Jhaveri K, Varghese J, Mueller PR. Algorithmic approach to CT diagnosis of the abnormal bowel wall. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:1093-1109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Byun JY, Ha HK, Yu SY, et al. CT features of systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with acute abdominal pain: emphasis on ischemic bowel disease. Radiology 1999; 211:203-209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Macari M, Balthazar EJ. CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1105-1116.[Free Full Text]
  5. Kawamoto S, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Pseudomembranous colitis: spectrum of imaging findings with clinical and pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1999; 19:887-897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Megibow AJ. The gastrointestinal tract. In: Haaga JR, eds. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the body. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1994; 855-895.
  7. Horton KM, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:399-418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Vecchioli A, De Franco A, Maresca G, Gore RM. Cross-sectional imaging. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, Laufer I, eds. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1994; 789-801.
  9. Macari M, Chandarana H, Balthazar EJ, Babb J. Intestinal ischemia versus intramural hemorrhage: CT evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:177-184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rha SE, Ha HK, Lee SH, et al. CT and MR imaging findings of bowel ischemia from various primary causes. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:29-42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gore RM, Miller FH, Pereles FS, Yaghmai V, Berlin JW. Helical CT in the evaluation of the acute abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:901-913.[Free Full Text]
  12. Wiesner W, Khurana B, Ji H, Ros PR. CT of acute bowel ischemia. Radiology 2003; 226:635-650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Balthazar EJ, Yen BC, Gordon RB. Ischemic colitis: CT evaluation of 54 cases. Radiology 1999; 211:381-388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gore RM, Balthazar EJ, Grahremani GG, Miller FH. CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:3-15.[Free Full Text]
  15. Wills JS, Lobis IF, Denstman FJ. Crohn disease: state of the art. Radiology 1997; 202:597-610.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. d'Almeida, J. Jose, J. Oneto, and R. Restrepo
Bowel Wall Thickening in Children: CT Findings
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 727 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Ahualli
The Fat Halo Sign
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 945 - 946.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahualli, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahualli, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE