Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2353040871
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lewin, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lewin, J. S.
(Radiology 2005;235:1065-1071.)
© RSNA, 2005


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

MR Imaging Follow-up after Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Findings in 18 Patients during First 6 Months1

Elmar M. Merkle, MD, Sherif Gamal Nour, MD and Jonathan S. Lewin, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke North-Room 1417, Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 (E.M.M.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (S.G.N.); and Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (J.S.L.). From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received May 13, 2004; revision requested August 2; revision received September 14; accepted October 20. Address correspondence to E.M.M. (e-mail: elmar.merkle@duke.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings seen within the first 6 months after radiofrequency (RF) thermal ablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: After providing written informed consent, 18 patients (17 men, one woman; mean age, 71.2 years) with RCC underwent MR imaging–guided percutaneous RF thermal ablation, which was performed by using protocols approved by a comprehensive cancer center protocol committee and the institutional review board for human investigation. The study was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. Follow-up unenhanced T2-weighted MR images and unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images were acquired immediately, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after ablation. Thermal ablation zone size was analyzed, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated from the signal amplitudes of the thermal ablation zone, perirenal fat, and normal renal cortex on the MR images. Statistical analyses were performed by using the paired Student t test. P < .05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 16.1 months (range, 6.0–41.2 months). The mean sizes of the thermal ablation zones were 6.8, 7.0, 6.1, and 4.7 cm2, respectively, at immediate, 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up MR imaging examinations. Thermal ablation zones were uniformly hypointense and had a surrounding bright rim on T2-weighted images and were predominantly hyperintense on T1-weighted images. Thin rim enhancement with central hypointensity was noted on the gadolinium-enhanced images. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted and unenhanced T2-weighted MR images showed significantly higher CNRs than unenhanced T1-weighted MR images. Residual tumor was detected after RF thermal ablation in two cases and was best seen on unenhanced T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images.

CONCLUSION: After initially increasing in size within the first 2 weeks, renal RF thermal ablation zones involuted during the remainder of the MR imaging follow-up period.

© RSNA, 2005


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The estimated number of new cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the United States in 2004 was 22 080 among men and 13 630 among women (1). These data equate to a greater than 30% increase in the incidence of RCC during the past 10 years and a greater than 100% increase in the incidence of RCC since 1950 (2,3). Most of these increases have occurred because of the diagnosis of small localized tumors that were detected incidentally in asymptomatic patients who were imaged for other reasons (3,4).

Although radical nephrectomy has long been considered the standard treatment for localized RCC, nephron-sparing surgery has been used increasingly (5). Segmental resection is particularly valuable in patients who have previously undergone nephrectomy or had a contralateral nonfunctioning renal unit. Other minimally invasive treatment modalities, such as laser ablation and radiofrequency (RF) thermal ablation, also have become of interest. These procedures are being performed increasingly in patients who either are not surgical candidates because of comorbidities or refuse to undergo surgery.

During the past 5 years, limited experience with RF thermal ablation in patients with RCC has been gained by numerous research groups (615). The surveillance protocol after performing this procedure usually consists of dedicated contrast material–enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the kidney. However, a considerable number of eligible patients cannot receive contrast agents that contain iodine because of preexisting impaired renal function or severe contrast material allergies. These patients are usually referred for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the kidney. Thus, the purpose of our study was to prospectively evaluate the short- and midterm MR imaging findings seen after RF thermal ablation of RCC.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
Between August 1999 and September 2003, after providing written informed consent, 18 patients (17 men, one woman; mean age, 71.2 years; range, 25–86 years) with solid RCC masses who met phase II trial eligibility criteria (described below) were treated with RF thermal ablation, which was performed by using protocols approved by a comprehensive cancer center protocol committee and the University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University institutional review board for human investigation, between August 1999 and September 2003. Our study was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. The main inclusion criteria for this trial were as follows: (a) The patient had to have a neoplasm that was not amenable to surgical therapy with curative or substantial palliative intent, have undergone unsuccessful chemotherapy or therapy with biologic response modifiers, or have a tumor that was unlikely to respond to conventional chemotherapy; and (b) the maximal renal tumor diameter had to be 4 cm or smaller.

The 18 patients underwent 21 RF thermal ablation procedures with MR imaging guidance, which was performed by using an open 0.2-T system (Magnetom Open; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). One patient had two RCC foci, another patient had an additional contralateral RCC, and a third patient with RCC was treated a second time after incomplete ablation. All tumors were either located peripherally away from the renal sinus or exophytic. Detailed descriptions of the interventional MR imaging suite and the MR imaging–guided ablation procedure that we used have been reported previously (15).

Follow-up MR Imaging
Follow-up MR imaging was performed in all patients immediately after the completion of the RF ablation, while the patient was still in the open MR imaging system. The low-field-strength (0.2-T) follow-up MR imaging protocol involved the acquisition of transverse T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) images (440/15, five signals acquired, 169 or 215 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm or 36 x 36-cm field of view) before and after intravenous administration of 0.2 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ) per kilogram of body weight (0.1 mmol/kg) or 0.2 mL/kg (0.1 mmol/kg) gadodiamide (Omniscan; Nycomed-Amersham, Princeton, NJ) and unenhanced coronal T2-weighted fast SE images (4000/102, four signals acquired, 126 or 182 x 256 matrix, 25 x 40-cm or 36 x 36-cm field of view, echo train length of seven).

High-field-strength (1.5-T) MR imaging was performed (with Magnetom Vision, Magnetom Symphony, or Magnetom Sonata system; Siemens Medical Solutions) 2 weeks after RF ablation, quarterly within the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. The high-field-strength follow-up MR imaging protocol involved unenhanced coronal T2-weighted half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) imaging (single-shot turbo SE sequence, 800/42, one signal acquired, 169 or 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm or 36 x 36-cm field of view) and transverse two-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) imaging (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 169 or 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm or 36 x 36-cm field of view) performed before and 3 minutes after intravenous administration of 0.2 mL/kg (0.1 mmol/kg) gadopentetate dimeglumine or 0.2 mL/kg (0.1 mmol/kg) gadodiamide.

The mean and longest follow-up durations were 16.1 months ± 11.3 (standard deviation) and 41.2 months, respectively; all patients were followed up for at least 6 months.

Image and Data Analyses
The follow-up MR images acquired within the first 6 months after ablation were evaluated for ablation zone size, signal intensity characteristics, and evidence of recurrent or residual tumor, which was defined as either an area of hyperintense soft tissue within the ablation zone or along its margin on T2-weighted images or an area of abnormal contrast enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images within the treated region.

The bidimensional thermal ablation zone sizes at each follow-up time point (immediately, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after ablation) were measured by using electronic calipers on the workstation monitor (Leonardo; Siemens Medical Solutions) and compared on the T2-weighted fast SE images. Only the hypointense area within the perirenal space was considered to be a thermal ablation zone (16).

The signal amplitudes of the uninvolved renal cortex (remote from the ablation site), the RF thermal ablation zone, and the perirenal fat were measured with each follow-up MR imaging sequence by defining the regions of interest (ROIs) on the free-standing MR imaging workstation. All measurements were performed by the same board-certified radiologist (S.G.N.), who had undergone fellowship training in MR imaging. The sizes of the ROIs used to measure the signal intensity amplitude in tissue ranged from 37 to 899 mm2 and were chosen in homogeneous, artifact-free areas of the tissue being measured. The standard deviation of the noise also was measured by using noise ROIs ranging in size from 535 to 676 mm2. The ROIs used for noise measurements were oval and had a long axis perpendicular to the phase-encoding direction. The noise measurement ROIs were positioned anterior to the abdominal wall (in front of the treated kidney) at transverse MR imaging and lateral to the treated kidney at coronal MR imaging (17). Each signal intensity amplitude value was calculated as the average value for three separately sampled ROIs. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated from the signal amplitudes in the thermal ablation zone, the normal renal cortex, and the perirenal fat divided by the standard deviation of the background noise.

Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed by using the paired Student t test (with Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Windows XP Professional software; Microsoft, Redmond, Wash) to test the null hypothesis that CNRs calculated by using various MR imaging sequences are the same. P values were derived from comparisons of the uninvolved renal cortex–to–thermal ablation zone CNRs and the perirenal fat–to–thermal ablation zone CNRs calculated with different follow-up MR imaging sequences immediately, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after ablation. P < .05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Size of Thermal Ablation Zone
The mean tumor size before ablation was 5.3 cm2 (range, 0.7–11.2 cm2). After an initial increase in thermal ablation zone size within the first 2 weeks, involution of the zones was observed during the remainder of the MR imaging follow-up period. The mean sizes of the thermal ablation zones in biplanar dimensions were 6.8 cm2 ± 3.3 (standard deviation) (range, 0.8–12.7 cm2), 7.0 cm2 ± 4.3 (range, 1.5–15.4 cm2), 6.1 cm2 ± 3.6 (range, 1.2–14.6 cm2), and 4.7 cm2 ± 3.0 (range, 1.5–11.4 cm2), respectively, at immediate, 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up MR imaging examinations.

Signal Intensity Characteristics
At T2-weighted fast SE MR imaging performed at 0.2 T immediately after RF ablation, the ablation zone in all cases appeared as a round or ovoid hypointense region that replaced the intermediate- or high-signal-intensity tumor seen on the preablation image. The hypointense thermal ablation zone was surrounded by a faintly bright rim with a well-defined inner border and an ill-defined outer border. The ablation zones did not have a consistent appearance on the unenhanced T1-weighted SE images: Compared with the intact renal cortex, the ablation zone appeared isointense, with a difference in signal intensity of less than 10%, in 33% of the cases; hyperintense, with a difference in signal intensity of more than 10%, in another 33% of the cases; and hypointense, with a difference in signal intensity of more than 10%, in the remaining 33% of the cases. Thin rim enhancement was noted on all contrast-enhanced MR images obtained immediately after ablation. The uninvolved perirenal fat had a higher signal intensity than the ablation zone at all postprocedural MR imaging examinations. Table 1 shows the mean CNRs between the thermal ablation zone and the surrounding tissue—either the renal cortex or the perirenal fat—calculated at immediate follow-up MR imaging.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Mean CNRs Calculated at Follow-up MR Imaging Immediately after Renal RF Thermal Ablation

 
For the high-field-strength (1.5-T) follow-up MR imaging examinations performed 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after RF thermal ablation, the T1-weighted SE sequence was replaced by a T1-weighted GRE breath-hold sequence. Thermal ablation zones continued to appear hypointense on the T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE images, similar to their appearance on the images obtained immediately after ablation (Fig 1) (Tables 2, 3). However, the surrounding reactive bright rim that was seen immediately after ablation resolved gradually over time and was barely detectable after the 3-month examination.



View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Coronal high-field-strength breath-hold T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE MR image (800/42, one signal acquired, 205 x 256 matrix, 36 x 36-cm field of view) obtained at 2-week follow-up shows hypointense RF-induced thermal ablation zone (arrowheads) at posterior aspect of interpolar region of the right kidney.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Mean CNRs between Renal Cortex and Thermal Ablation Zone Calculated at Follow-up MR Imaging after Renal RF Ablation

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Mean CNRs between Perirenal Fat and Thermal Ablation Zone Calculated at Follow-up MR Imaging After Renal RF Ablation

 
The RF thermal ablation zones had variable appearances on unenhanced T1-weighted GRE MR images. The zones appeared hyperintense compared with the renal cortex in the majority of cases: after 13 (62%) of the 21 procedures at 2-week follow-up and after 14 (67%) procedures at the 3- and 6-month follow-up examinations (Fig 2). The remaining thermal ablation zones appeared either isointense (after three [14%] procedures at the 2-week and 6-month follow-up examinations, after four [19%] procedures at 3-month follow-up) or hypointense (after five [24%] procedures at 2-week follow-up, after three [14%] procedures at 3-month follow-up, after four [19%] procedures at 6-month follow-up) compared with the uninvolved renal cortex. In three cases, the thermal ablation zone appeared hyperintense, even when compared with the perirenal fat (Fig 2). Rim enhancement was noted on all contrast-enhanced postablation images, but it resolved gradually over time and was barely detectable, as was the bright rim on T2-weighted fast SE images, after the 3-month examination (Fig 3).



View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Transverse two-dimensional T1-weighted GRE MR images (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view) of four different ablated RCCs (arrowheads) demonstrate the spectrum of possible signal intensity characteristics at high-field-strength (1.5-T) imaging. Thermal ablation zones may appear (a) hypointense, (b) isointense, or (c) hyperintense. The signal intensities of three of the 21 ablation zones, one of which is shown in d (arrowheads), were even higher than the signal intensity of the adjacent perirenal fat.

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Transverse two-dimensional T1-weighted GRE MR images (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view) of four different ablated RCCs (arrowheads) demonstrate the spectrum of possible signal intensity characteristics at high-field-strength (1.5-T) imaging. Thermal ablation zones may appear (a) hypointense, (b) isointense, or (c) hyperintense. The signal intensities of three of the 21 ablation zones, one of which is shown in d (arrowheads), were even higher than the signal intensity of the adjacent perirenal fat.

 


View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. Transverse two-dimensional T1-weighted GRE MR images (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view) of four different ablated RCCs (arrowheads) demonstrate the spectrum of possible signal intensity characteristics at high-field-strength (1.5-T) imaging. Thermal ablation zones may appear (a) hypointense, (b) isointense, or (c) hyperintense. The signal intensities of three of the 21 ablation zones, one of which is shown in d (arrowheads), were even higher than the signal intensity of the adjacent perirenal fat.

 


View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2d. Transverse two-dimensional T1-weighted GRE MR images (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view) of four different ablated RCCs (arrowheads) demonstrate the spectrum of possible signal intensity characteristics at high-field-strength (1.5-T) imaging. Thermal ablation zones may appear (a) hypointense, (b) isointense, or (c) hyperintense. The signal intensities of three of the 21 ablation zones, one of which is shown in d (arrowheads), were even higher than the signal intensity of the adjacent perirenal fat.

 


View larger version (171K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Transverse high-field-strength two-dimensional fast low-angle shot GRE MR images (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view) obtained at 2-week follow-up show appearances of an RF-induced thermal ablation zone (arrowheads) at posterior aspect of interpolar region of the right kidney. (a) On unenhanced image, the ablation zone is hyperintense owing to hemorrhage. (b) On gadolinium-enhanced image, the ablation zone has enhancing margins.

 


View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Transverse high-field-strength two-dimensional fast low-angle shot GRE MR images (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view) obtained at 2-week follow-up show appearances of an RF-induced thermal ablation zone (arrowheads) at posterior aspect of interpolar region of the right kidney. (a) On unenhanced image, the ablation zone is hyperintense owing to hemorrhage. (b) On gadolinium-enhanced image, the ablation zone has enhancing margins.

 
Statistical Analyses
A detailed listing of all P values is provided in Table 4. At immediate follow-up MR imaging performed with the low-field-strength (0.2-T) system, the T2-weighted fast SE sequence yielded the highest CNR values between the uninvolved renal cortex and the ablation zone. Differences in CNR between the T2-weighted fast SE sequence and the T1-weighted SE sequence before as well as after gadolinium-based contrast material administration were statistically significant (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. P Values for Comparisons of CNRs between Different Follow-up MR Imaging Sequences after RF Thermal Ablation

 
With use of high-field-strength MR imaging systems 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after RF ablation, the CNRs between the uninvolved renal cortex and the ablation zone were higher on the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images than on the unenhanced T2- and T1-weighted images. These differences were statistically significant at all analyses except one: that in which the CNRs calculated at 6-month contrast-enhanced T1-weighted GRE MR imaging follow-up were compared with those calculated at 6-month T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE MR imaging follow-up (Table 4). T2-weighted imaging was superior to unenhanced T1-weighted imaging in the comparison of uninvolved renal cortex–to–ablation zone CNRs (Table 4).

Perirenal fat–to–ablation zone CNRs were not significantly different at immediate-follow-up low-field-strength MR imaging (Table 4). During the further course of the follow-up period with 1.5-T MR imaging, both the T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE sequence and the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted GRE sequence yielded significantly higher CNRs between the perirenal fat and the ablation zone than the unenhanced T1-weighted GRE sequence (Table 4).

Residual and Recurrent Tumors
The two patients in this series with the largest and most central tumors (maximal diameters, 3.6 and 4.0 cm) were treated with the primary aim of debulking the tumors. One of these patients underwent one ablation session, and the other underwent two. In both patients, residual tumor was clearly visualized on the intraprocedural intermittently acquired T2-weighted fast SE images as hyperintense tissue that was well contrasted against the hypointense ablation zone. In terms of depiction on the MR images obtained immediately and at subsequent follow-up examinations after ablation, residual RCC was seen best on the T2-weighted images—as hyperintense tissue—and it was seen as enhancing tissue on the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (Fig 4).



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. Transverse high-field-strength MR images of the ablation zone (arrows) after the first of two debulking thermal ablation procedures performed to palliate patient with a large central RCC of the right kidney and global renal function impairment. (a) On breath-hold T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE image (800/42, one signal acquired, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view), the ablation zone is hypointense. (b) On unenhanced two-dimensional T1-weighted in-phase GRE image (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40- cm field of view), the ablation zone is hyperintense. (c) On gadolinium-enhanced two-dimensional T1-weighted GRE image (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view), the ablation zone has no enhancement. The area of residual tumor (white arrowheads) can be readily identified as hyperintense tissue capping the anteromedial aspect of the ablation zone in a, as an isointense area in b, and as a markedly enhancing area in c. Note the left-sided nephrostomy tube (black arrowheads in a and c).

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. Transverse high-field-strength MR images of the ablation zone (arrows) after the first of two debulking thermal ablation procedures performed to palliate patient with a large central RCC of the right kidney and global renal function impairment. (a) On breath-hold T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE image (800/42, one signal acquired, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view), the ablation zone is hypointense. (b) On unenhanced two-dimensional T1-weighted in-phase GRE image (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40- cm field of view), the ablation zone is hyperintense. (c) On gadolinium-enhanced two-dimensional T1-weighted GRE image (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view), the ablation zone has no enhancement. The area of residual tumor (white arrowheads) can be readily identified as hyperintense tissue capping the anteromedial aspect of the ablation zone in a, as an isointense area in b, and as a markedly enhancing area in c. Note the left-sided nephrostomy tube (black arrowheads in a and c).

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4c. Transverse high-field-strength MR images of the ablation zone (arrows) after the first of two debulking thermal ablation procedures performed to palliate patient with a large central RCC of the right kidney and global renal function impairment. (a) On breath-hold T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE image (800/42, one signal acquired, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view), the ablation zone is hypointense. (b) On unenhanced two-dimensional T1-weighted in-phase GRE image (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40- cm field of view), the ablation zone is hyperintense. (c) On gadolinium-enhanced two-dimensional T1-weighted GRE image (fast low-angle shot sequence, 222/2.6, 70° flip angle, 205 x 256 matrix, 30 x 40-cm field of view), the ablation zone has no enhancement. The area of residual tumor (white arrowheads) can be readily identified as hyperintense tissue capping the anteromedial aspect of the ablation zone in a, as an isointense area in b, and as a markedly enhancing area in c. Note the left-sided nephrostomy tube (black arrowheads in a and c).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The high incidence of small renal tumors has forced a reevaluation of radical nephrectomy as the primary therapeutic option for treatment of RCC, and nephron-sparing surgery is increasingly being advocated, especially when renal function is of prime importance (5,18).

Parallel to nephron-sparing surgery, minimally invasive therapeutic modalities such as image-guided percutaneous RF thermal ablation also have been refined (3,7). The monitoring protocol after these procedures usually consists of dedicated contrast-enhanced CT of the kidneys performed within 1 month after the ablation and then at 3 and 6 months. Additional surveillance CT scans are usually obtained every 6–12 months (7). Thermal ablation areas are poorly visualized on contrast-enhanced CT surveillance images, however, and the diagnosis of residual or recurrent tumor is based only on contrast enhancement characteristics (19,20). Although the use of CT as the primary imaging modality is justified because of cost and availability issues, a substantial number of eligible patients cannot be exposed to iodine-containing contrast agents owing to preexisting allergies or impaired renal function, with creatinine levels higher than 2.0 mg/dL (176.8 µmol/L) (7). These patients are usually referred for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the kidneys (7).

Thermal Ablation Zone Size and Involution over Time
Thermal ablation zones—defined as hypointense areas—could be clearly delineated on all postprocedural T2-weighted MR images obtained in our study. After an average initial increase in the RF thermal ablation zone size of approximately 10% at bidimensional measurements obtained within the first 2 weeks after ablation, the involution of these zones—by an average of approximately 30%—was observed during the following 6 months of the MR imaging follow-up period. This involution most likely reflected the elimination of coagulation necrosis by macrophages and other components of the human immune system and was consistent with the involution pattern that has been seen in the liver, pancreas, and kidneys in animal studies (2123).

Signal Intensity Characteristics of Thermal Ablation Zones
RF thermal ablation involves a spectrum of tissue damage processes, including deactivation of enzymes, cell membrane rupture and alteration of tissue structure, protein denaturation and aggregation, and vasoconstriction and intravascular coagulation (24). These effects manifest during different temperature elevations and heating durations, and probably only a subset of these effects are observable as obvious MR imaging signal intensity alterations. In addition, various tissue types have varied responses after thermal treatment in terms of MR imaging signal intensity characteristics. Graham et al (24) found that various tissue types can be classified into four groups: fat, blood, neural tissue such as brain, and fibrous or glandular tissue such as muscle, liver, and kidney.

Fat predominantly consists of triglycerides that undergo reversible effects during the thermal ablation process (24). This phenomenon explains the lack of permanent MR imaging signal intensity alterations after thermal treatment in perirenal fat tissue. In short, thermal ablation zones extending into the perirenal fat appear bright on T1- and T2-weighted MR images.

In contrast, fibrous or glandular tissue such as the renal parenchyma demonstrates irreversible effects, including denaturation and shrinkage of proteins such as collagen and increased hydrophobic interactions, that result in the extrusion of water. These irreversible effects most likely represent the underlying cause of the shortened T2 relaxation time after thermal ablation, which ultimately leads to the uniform hypointense appearance of the ablation zones on T2-weighted MR images. This hypointense appearance on T2-weighted MR images obtained in humans coincides with the experimental data acquired in animal models after renal thermal ablation (16,25); it also resembles the signal intensity pattern seen in other human organs such as the liver and brain.

On the other hand, the appearances of thermal ablation zones on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images have a high degree of variability compared with the uniform hypointense appearance of these zones on T2-weighted MR images. In the current study, although the appearances of the thermal ablation zones as hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense relative to the uninvolved renal cortex were equally common at low-field-strength unenhanced T1-weighted SE MR imaging performed immediately after ablation, the thermal ablation zones appeared hyperintense compared with the uninvolved renal cortex in the majority of cases at further follow-up MR imaging performed with T1-weighted GRE sequences and high-field-strength systems.

The level of reduction in T1 relaxation time during thermal ablation correlates with the degree of tissue vascularity (24). This correlation explains why RF thermal ablation zones appear slightly hyperintense on unenhanced T1-weighted GRE MR images in the majority of cases in the liver and kidney. It also explains why renal RF thermal ablation zones should appear slightly brighter than hepatic RF thermal ablation zones: The degree of vascularity in the kidney is higher than the degree of vascularity in the liver (26). However, this correlation does not explain why renal RF thermal ablation zones have variable appearances—from hypointense to markedly hyperintense compared with uninvolved renal cortex—on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images; these findings usually are not seen following RF thermal ablation of focal hepatic lesions. Procedure-related diffuse hemorrhage within the thermal ablation zone may be the most likely explanation for this discrepancy. Reasons for this hemorrhage are probably twofold: First, the risk of bleeding during renal biopsy is higher than that during hepatic biopsy owing to the purely arterial blood supply of the kidneys compared with the mainly portal venous blood supply of the liver. Second, RCC is generally a more hypervascular tumor than hypovascular colorectal metastases to the liver. Blood itself exhibits an abrupt decrease in T1 and T2 relaxation times at temperatures higher than 60°C, which results in a hyperintense appearance on T1-weighted MR images (24). Diffuse hemorrhage may also explain why the hyperintense appearance of renal RF thermal ablation zones is more often appreciated on high-field-strength GRE MR images than on low-field-strength SE MR images.

At contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging, no substantial enhancement was observed within the RF thermal ablation zone. However, rim enhancement that gradually resolved over time and was barely detectable after the 3-month examination was noted on all contrast-enhanced postablation images.

Residual or Recurrent Tumor
The major reason for performing surveillance imaging after renal RF thermal ablation is the early detection of residual or recurrent tumor. Although contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings are quite similar to the findings seen at CT, the RF thermal ablation zone also is very well depicted on unenhanced T2-weighted MR images. This additional information is very helpful, as seen in the two cases of residual tumor following RF thermal ablation in the current series. In these cases, residual RCC was best seen on the unenhanced T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images.

Study Limitations
The major limitations of our study were the relatively small number of patients examined and the lack of a true reference standard, such as results of gross pathologic and/or microscopic analysis of the RF ablation zone, for comparison with the MR imaging findings. The minor limitations of our study were the two contrast agents and two magnetic field strengths used. However, the statistical analyses were performed by using data acquired at the same follow-up imaging session only and not by using data from different follow-up imaging sessions. Thus, these two minor limitations probably did not substantially affect our quantitative data analyses.

RF thermal ablation zones in the kidneys have the same pattern as RF thermal ablation zones in the liver in terms of the temporal evolution of the ablation zone size. After an initial increase in size within the first 2 weeks, involution occurs during the remainder of the MR imaging follow-up period. Although the signal intensity characteristics of the kidneys on T2-weighted MR images obtained after RF thermal treatment are the same as those of the liver—both organs appear hypointense—the appearance of the renal RF thermal ablation zone on T1-weighted MR images is brighter than that of the hepatic RF thermal ablation zone. This appearance is best appreciated on GRE MR images and most likely reflects diffuse hemorrhage within the thermal ablation zone. The high vascularity of RCCs and the purely arterial blood supply of the kidneys compared with the mainly portal venous blood supply of the liver may explain this finding.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: CNR = contrast-to-noise ratio, GRE = gradient echo, RARE = rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement, RCC = renal cell carcinoma, RF = radiofrequency, ROI = region of interest, SE = spin echo

Authors stated no financial relationship to disclose.

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, E.M.M., J.S.L.; study concepts and design, E.M.M., S.G.N., J.S.L.; literature research, E.M.M.; clinical studies, E.M.M., S.G.N., J.S.L.; data acquisition and analysis/interpretation, E.M.M., S.G.N., J.S.L.; statistical analysis, E.M.M.; manuscript preparation, definition of intellectual content, revision/review, and final version approval, E.M.M., S.G.N., J.S.L.; manuscript editing, E.M.M., S.G.N.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54:8-29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T, Montgomery S. Cancer statistics, 1994. CA Cancer J Clin 1994; 44:7-26.[Medline]
  3. Zagoria RJ. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal malignancies. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:1067-1075.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF, Jr. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 1999; 281:1628-1631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Licht MR, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1993; 149:1-7.[Medline]
  6. Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Wood BJ, Goldberg SN, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Radio-frequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: early clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 217:665-672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Arellano RS, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Renal cell carcinoma: clinical experience and technical success with radio-frequency ablation of 42 tumors. Radiology 2003; 226:417-424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lui KW, Gervais DA, Arellano RA, Mueller PR. Radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma. Clin Radiol 2003; 58:905-913.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Raj GV, Reddan DJ, Hoey MB, Polascik TJ. Management of small renal tumors with radiofrequency ablation. Urology 2003; 61:23-29.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE, Parikh PM, Pezzullo JA, Cronan JJ. Imaging-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of solid renal masses: techniques and outcomes of 38 treatment sessions in 32 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:1503-1508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ogan K, Jacomides L, Dolmatch BL, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: technique, limitations, and morbidity. Urology 2002; 60:954-958.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Farrell MA, Charboneau WJ, DiMarco DS, et al. Imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation of solid renal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:1509-1513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Roy-Choudhury SH, Cast JEI, Cooksey G, Puri S, Breen DJ. Early experience with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small solid renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:1055-1061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rendon RA, Kachura JR, Sweet JM, et al. The uncertainty of radio frequency treatment of renal cell carcinoma: findings at immediate and delayed nephrectomy. J Urol 2002; 167:1587-1592.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Lewin JS, Nour SG, Connell CF, et al. Phase II clinical trial of interactive MR imaging–guided interstitial radiofrequency thermal ablation of primary kidney tumors: initial experience. Radiology 2004; 232:835-845.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Merkle EM, Shonk JR, Duerk JL, Jacobs GH, Lewin JS. MR-guided RF thermal ablation of the kidney in a porcine model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:645-651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Pijl ME, Doornbos J, Wasser MN, van Houwelingen HC, Tollenaar RA, Bloem JL. Quantitative analysis of focal masses at MR imaging: a plea for standardization. Radiology 2004; 231:737-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lerner SE, Hawkins CA, Blute ML, et al. Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery. J Urol 1996; 155:1868-1873.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Su LM, Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Kavoussi LR, Solomon SB. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal masses in high surgical risk patients: preliminary results. Urology 2003; 61(4 suppl 1):26-33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Goldberg SN, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD, 3rd, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: proposal for standardization of terms and reporting criteria. Radiology 2003; 228:335-345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Crowley JD, Shelton J, Iverson AJ, Burton MP, Dalrymple NC, Bishoff JT. Laparoscopic and computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tissue: acute and chronic effects in an animal model. Urology 2001; 57:976-980.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Merkle EM, Boll DT, Boaz T, et al. MRI-guided radiofrequency thermal ablation of implanted VX2 liver tumors in a rabbit model: demonstration of feasibility at 0.2 T. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:141-149.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Merkle EM, Haaga JR, Duerk JL, Jacobs GH, Brambs HJ, Lewin JS. MR imaging–guided radio-frequency thermal ablation in the pancreas in a porcine model with a modified clinical C-arm system. Radiology 1999; 213:461-467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Graham SJ, Stanisz GJ, Kecojevic A, Bronskill MJ, Henkelman RM. Analysis of changes in MR properties of tissues after heat treatment. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:1061-1071.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Aschoff AJ, Sulman A, Martinez M, et al. Perfusion-modulated MR imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation of the kidney in a porcine model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:151-158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hwang JJ, Walther MM, Pautler SE, et al. Radio frequency ablation of small renal tumors: intermediate results. J Urol 2004; 171:1814-1818.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
O. Kolokythas, T. Gauthier, A. T. Fernandez, H. Xie, B. A. Timm, C. Cuevas, M. K. Dighe, L. M. Mitsumori, M. F. Bruce, D. A. Herzka, et al.
Ultrasound-Based Elastography: A Novel Approach to Assess Radio Frequency Ablation of Liver Masses Performed With Expandable Ablation Probes: A Feasibility Study
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 935 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. P. S. Kirkham, M. Emberton, I. M. Hoh, R. O. Illing, A. A. Freeman, and C. Allen
MR Imaging of Prostate after Treatment with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 833 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Syvanthong, G. E. Wile, and R. J. Zagoria
Effect of Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Tumors on Renal Function in Patients with a Solitary Kidney
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1619 - 1621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. E. Wile, J. R. Leyendecker, K. A. Krehbiel, R. B. Dyer, and R. J. Zagoria
CT and MR Imaging after Imaging-guided Thermal Ablation of Renal Neoplasms
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 325 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Kawamoto, S. Permpongkosol, D. A. Bluemke, E. K. Fishman, and S. B. Solomon
Sequential Changes after Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoablation of Renal Neoplasms: Role of CT and MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 343 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lewin, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lewin, J. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE