Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2371041397
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heerschap, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heerschap, A.
(Radiology 2005;237:181-188.)
© RSNA, 2005


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Gadopentetate Dimeglumine and FDG Uptake in Liver Metastases of Colorectal Carcinoma as Determined with MR Imaging and PET1

Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, MD, MA, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei, MD, Bastiaan Wiering, MD, Jasper Lok, BSc, Mark Rijpkema, PhD2, Johannes H. A. M. Kaanders, MD, PhD, Paul F. M. Krabbe, PhD, Theo Ruers, MD, PhD, Cornelis J. A. Punt, MD, PhD, Albert J. van der Kogel, PhD, Wim J. G. Oyen, MD, PhD and Arend Heerschap, PhD

1 From the Departments of Medical Oncology (H.W.M.v.L., C.J.A.P.), Nuclear Medicine (L.F.d.G., W.J.G.O.), Surgery (B.W., T.R.), Radiation Oncology (J.L., J.H.A.M.K., A.J.v.d.K.), Radiology (M.R., A.H.), and Medical Technology Assessment (P.F.M.K.), University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Received August 11, 2004; revision requested October 14; revision received December 1; accepted January 14, 2005. Supported by the Dutch Cancer Society, grant KUN 2000-2307. Address correspondence to H.W.M.v.L. (e-mail: h.vanlaarhoven{at}onco.umcn.nl).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To examine the in vivo relationship between fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake, as measured with positron emission tomography (PET), and functional tumor vasculature, as measured with dynamic contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the institutional review board. A total of 26 patients (12 men and 14 women; mean age, 59 years) who were suspected of having liver metastases of histologically proved colorectal cancer and underwent work-up for liver metastasectomy were included. Patients underwent whole-body FDG PET, and tumor-to-nontumor ratio of FDG uptake in metastases was calculated. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed, and the rate constant kep (s–1) of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake in metastases was determined. Pimonidazole was used to determine tumor hypoxia and vascular density of metastases. To assess the relationship between FDG uptake, rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake, hypoxic fraction, and vascular density, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated.

RESULTS: Negative correlation between tumor-to-nontumor ratio of FDG uptake and rate constant kep was observed (r = –0.421, P = .082). No correlation between tumor hypoxia and tumor-to-nontumor ratio of FDG uptake or rate constant kep was found. A positive correlation was observed between vascular density and rate constant kep (r = 0.458, P = .034) but not between tumor-to-nontumor ratio of FDG uptake.

CONCLUSION: Negative correlation between tumor-to-nontumor ratio of FDG uptake and rate constant kep suggests that lower values of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake imply an acutely reduced supply of oxygen, which necessitates a higher uptake of glucose to maintain tumor energy levels. The positive correlation of vascular density with rate constant kep, but not with tumor-to-nontumor ratio of FDG uptake, emphasizes the potential of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to enable measurement of tumor vascularity in vivo and its additional value compared with ex vivo methods.

© RSNA, 2005


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Metastatic colorectal cancer is managed on the basis of findings obtained with imaging methods that are generally anatomic in nature. An exception is positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). FDG PET is based on elevated glucose utilization in malignant cells compared with that in healthy tissue (1). FDG PET has been proved useful in the follow-up of patients with colorectal malignancies in the differentiation of recurrent colorectal tumor and scar tissue (2). In a small series of patients, FDG PET was more accurate than computed tomography (CT) in the determination of response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (3). Furthermore, FDG PET may substantially improve preoperative staging for resection of liver metastases with sensitive detection of extrahepatic disease (4,5). Previous results suggest that FDG PET can be used to predict response to chemotherapy in patients with hepatic metastases (6).

Although FDG uptake generally is increased in malignant tumors, the underlying mechanism for increased glucose uptake, and thus for increased FDG PET signal, is still a matter of debate. For glucose to be taken up and used by a cancer cell, an adequate vascular supply—and thus angiogenesis or vascular cooption—is necessary, as is the presence of several membrane-bound glucose transport proteins, which facilitate transport of glucose over the cell membrane. The intracellular hexokinase isoforms are necessary for subsequent phosphorylation into glucose-6-phosphate, which may then be further converted via the glycolytic pathway. All of these factors (ie, vascularity, transmembrane transport, phosphorylation, and glycolysis) are known to be upregulated in cancer cells (7); this may be due to overexpression of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1{alpha} protein. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1{alpha} can be overexpressed in tumors in response to tumor hypoxia resulting from an inefficient tumor vascular network and constitutively as a result of gene mutations (8). In fact, (constitutive) overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1{alpha} induces vascular endothelial growth factor expression, which may lead to an inefficient tumor vascular network and result in insufficient tumor oxygenation. Thus, tumor hypoxia seems to play a pivotal role in the metabolic status of tumors.

To improve the understanding of PET findings, several studies have focused on the link between FDG uptake and biomarkers such as glucose transport proteins, hexokinase, and vascular density. Some authors have reported positive correlations between these biomarkers and FDG uptake (9,10), but other authors have reported negative correlations (1115). Divergent results may be explained by differences in tumor biology, immunohistochemical staining methods, and PET procedures. However, one usually does not account for the fact that FDG uptake is measured in vivo, whereas ex vivo data are obtained with immunohistochemical analysis. This may be particularly important for the (lack of a) relationship between FDG uptake and vascular density, since it is not so much the presence of tumor vasculature but the presence of functional tumor vasculature that may play a role in the determination of FDG uptake.

Functionality of tumor vasculature can be monitored in vivo by using dynamic contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with gadopentetate dimeglumine. From physiologic models for the analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, data parameters for vascularity (eg, blood flow and permeability of blood vessels) can be determined (16,17). Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging currently is used for tumor identification in the clinic. For example, in patients with breast cancer, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging has been proved to be an accurate method in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions (18). Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters may provide a useful noninvasive measure in both the prediction of treatment outcome and the follow-up of therapy (19); furthermore, they have been shown to have predictive value in the response to treatment of several primary tumors (2025).

The purpose of our study was to examine the in vivo relationship between FDG uptake, as measured with PET, and functional tumor vasculature, as measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Patients
Patients suspected of having liver metastases of histologically proved colorectal carcinoma who underwent work-up for liver resection were eligible for this study. Patient data were included in the analysis of the present study when data of at least two of the three functional imaging modalities were available (ie, PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data, PET and immunohistochemistry data, or dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and immunohistochemistry data). All patients gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the institutional review board of the University Medical Center, Nijmegen. Between May 2001 and September 2003, data from 26 patients were available for analysis (12 men, 14 women; mean age, 60 years; age range, 43–74 years).

FDG PET Scanning
Whole-body FDG PET scanning was performed as part of the work-up for liver metastasectomy when clinically indicated according to the treating surgeon. Imaging was performed with a dedicated PET scanner (Ecat Exact; Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, Tenn). Prior to FDG injection, patients fasted for at least 6 hours. Intake of sugar-free liquids was permitted. Immediately before the procedure, the patients were hydrated with 500 mL of water. One hour after intravenous injection of 200–220 MBq FDG (Mallinckrodt Medical, Petten, the Netherlands) and 12 mg furosemide, emission and transmission images of the area between the proximal femora and the base of the skull were acquired (10 minutes per bed position). The images were corrected for attenuation and reconstructed by using the ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm.

FDG PET Image Analysis
Tumor metabolism was evaluated semiquantitatively with calculation of the tumor-to-nontumor ratio of FDG uptake by using a semiautomated method, with normal liver tissue adjacent to the lesions serving as the reference standard. A volume of interest in liver metastasis was defined by using a 50% threshold of maximum intensity. Central photopenic areas in the metastases, which may be regarded as areas of gross tumor necrosis, were excluded from the volume of interest. The images were analyzed by two independent observers (W.J.G.O. and L.F.d.G., with 7 and 4 years of PET experience, respectively) who were blinded to findings of quantitative MR imaging and histologic analysis. Disagreements between the two observers were resolved by consensus. The normal liver volume of interest was placed adjacent to the measured lesion. The boundaries of the volume of interest were just within the apparent hypermetabolic zone of the tumor. Volumes of interest of identical configuration were placed on normal liver tissue to serve as the reference standard for normalization.

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed in all patients who underwent work-up for liver metastasectomy as part of a wider research program to validate the use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with liver metastases. Three authors (H.W.M.v.L., M.R., and A.H., all with at least 4 years of experience with liver MR) were involved in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and data collection. There was no randomization as to which test (MR imaging or PET) was performed first; the clinical order was followed. In practice, patients underwent PET before or on the same day as MR imaging.

Examinations were performed with a 1.5-T MR system (Vision; Siemens) and a body phased-array coil. After conventional T1- and T2-weighted imaging in the transverse, coronal, and saggital directions, a 15-mL dose of 0.5 mol/L gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Schering, Berlin, Germany) was administered intravenously with an MR injection system (Spectris; Medrad, Maastricht, the Netherlands) and an injection rate of 2.5 mL/sec. Gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake in the tumor and bolus passage in vessels in the spleen were monitored by using a T1-weighted fast low-angle shot sequence with a time resolution of 2 seconds. Sequence parameters were as follows: repetition time msec/echo time msec, 50.0/4.4; flip angle, 90°; section thickness, 7 mm; four sections acquired; matrix, 160 x 256; field of view, 263 x 350 mm. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data were acquired for 90 seconds. If the four sections did not fully cover the tumor in the head-foot direction, sections were positioned in such a way that the largest diameter of the tumor (measured left to right on the coronal image) was covered.

Just before gadopentetate dimeglumine injection, proton-density weighted images were obtained with the same sequence parameters as were used for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, with the exception of an 8° flip angle and a 200-msec repetition time. Data from these images were combined with the dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data to calculate the concentration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in arbitrary units by using the method described by Hittmair et al (26).

For analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data, to which readers were blinded for analysis of PET data, we used the previously described method (27). In brief, we obtained a vascular normalization function from pixels in the spleen by using an algorithm based on the concentration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (which is high in blood vessels) and time to bolus passage (which is short in arteries). A physiologic pharmacokinetic model (17) was used to analyze the gadopentetate dimeglumine concentration versus time curves of the pixels in all MR sections containing tumor tissue. Values of the rate constant kep (s–1) of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake were calculated with the following formula: Ct(t) = Ktrans · ekep·t * Cp(t), where Ct(t) = tissue concentration of gadopentetate dimeglumine as a function of time, Ktrans = volume transfer constant (s–1), kep = rate constant (s–1) between extravascular extracellular space and blood plasma, and Cp(t) = concentration of contrast agent in plasma of a capillary as a function of time; * denotes a convolution operation (28). In the model of Larsson et al (17), the gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake rate constant kep is directly related to tumor blood flow, the product of the permeability of perfused capillaries, and the total surface area of perfused capillaries, according to the following equation: kep = (1 – exp[–PS/TBF]) · TBF/Ve, in which Ve = volume of contrast extravascular extracellular space per unit volume of tissue, P = permeability of capillaries (measured in centimeters per second), S = total surface area of vessels (measured in square centimeters), PS = permeability surface area product (measured in milliliters per second), and TBF = tumor blood flow (measured in milliliters per second).

The spatial distribution of the kep values was represented in a map. On a T1-weighted MR image obtained directly before gadopentetate dimeglumine injection, a region of interest that comprised the metastases was drawn. This region of interest was applied to the map of the rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake to enable selection of the single kep values for all tumor pixels. The mean of the rate constant kep of these pixels was calculated after log transformation and was averaged over all sections containing tumor tissue. Log transformation excludes all values of kep equal to zero. These tumor pixels may be regarded as necrotic tumor parts. Back transformation of this average log-transformed value resulted in an average kep value for the whole tumor (27).

In 12 patients for whom sufficient time remained before surgery was planned, the measurement protocol was repeated with an interval of 1–4 days as part of a reproducibility study. The dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging results of 10 of these 12 patients have been published elsewhere (27). For these patients, the average kep value for the whole tumor was calculated from the mean of the two measurements, and this mean value was used for further calculations.

Tumor Hypoxia and Vascular Density
Pimonidazole (1-[(2-hydroxy-3-piperidinyl)propyl]-2-nitroimidazole hydrochloride; Natural Pharmacia International, Belmont, Mass) was selected as a hypoxia marker (2931) and injected intravenously over 20 minutes at a dose of 500 mg per kilogram of body weight at least 12 hours before the start of surgery. Pimonidazole is a bioreductive chemical probe with an immunorecognizable side chain. Complete inhibition of bioreductive activation occurs at a partial pressure of oxygen of less than 10 mm Hg (31).

Immediately after surgical resection, the metastasis for which dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data were available was identified in the gross pathologic specimen by using the T1- and T2-weighted MR images obtained in the transverse, coronal, and saggital directions. On the T1-weighted MR images, the distance in the craniocaudal direction was measured from the edge of the metastasis to the center of the region where the sections for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging were obtained. In the gross pathologic specimen, the same distance was measured; at this level, a pathologist cut a 3-mm transverse slice of the liver metastasis. In case of relatively small metastases (approximately 2 cm), the whole slice was taken for further analysis. In case of larger metastases maximally, five smaller biopsy samples (approximately 5 x 5 mm) were taken from the larger slice (four biopsy samples from the rim and one from the center). The biopsy samples from the rim were evenly distributed (ie, one from the dorsal part, one from the ventral part, one from the lateral part, and one from the medial part of the tumor). The material was snap-frozen in isopentane (BDH, Dagenham, England), precooled in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C until further use. The differentiation grade and largest size of the metastases were recorded from the clinical report of gross pathologic analysis.

Frozen tumor slices of 5-µm thickness were cut for immunohistochemical staining and analysis of hypoxia and vascular density. After thawing, the slices were fixed in cold (4°C) acetone for 10 minutes and rehydrated in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 minutes. Between the consecutive steps of the staining procedure, the slices were rinsed three times for 2 minutes in phosphate-buffered saline. To stain the hypoxic marker and the vasculature, slices were incubated with a mouse antibody (Pathologie Anatomie Leiden-Endotheel, Department of Pathology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands) that was diluted to a 1:15 ratio and with a rabbit antipimonidazole (Department of Radiation Oncology, North Carolina Clinical Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC) (30,32) that was diluted to a 1:200 ratio in polyclonal liquid dilutant (Euro DPC, Breda, the Netherlands) during 30 minutes at 37°C. Slices were then incubated with goat antimouse TexasRED (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, West Grove, Penn) and donkey antirabbit Alexa488 (Molecular Probes, Leiden, the Netherlands), both diluted to a 1:200 ratio in polyclonal liquid dilutant during 30 minutes at 37°C. Finally, slices were mounted in Fluorostab (Organon, Boxtel, the Netherlands).

Quantitative data for hypoxia and tumor vasculature were acquired with a semiautomatic method based on a computerized digital image analysis system, as described previously (33,34). In brief, a high-resolution intensified solid-state camera on a fluorescence microscope (Axioskop; Zeiss, Weesp, the Netherlands) with a computer-controlled motorized stepping stage was used to examine each tumor sample. Whole tumor samples were examined at x100 magnification with different filters for the detection of the fluorescent signals. Each examination consisted of 36–144 fields of 1.2 mm2, depending on the size of the tumor slice. From the individual microscopic fields, one composite image was reconstructed after each examination. As a final step, a contour line was drawn to delineate the viable tumor area by using consecutive hematoxylin-eosin stained tumor slices to distinguish tumor tissue from nontumor tissue. The hypoxic fraction of the tumor slice was computed as the tissue surface area stained by the hypoxic marker relative to the viable tumor surface area, and vascular density was calculated as the total number of vessels per square millimeter of viable tumor area. The average hypoxic fraction and vascular density for each liver metastasis were calculated, averaging the scores of all tumor sections per liver metastasis.

Statistical Analysis
The mean and range of tumor-to-nontumor ratio, rate constant kep, hypoxic fraction, and vascular density for the whole population were calculated. To assess the relationship between FDG uptake, rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake, hypoxic fraction, and vascular density, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated with computer software (SPSS, version 12.0.1; SPSS, Chicago, Ill). To calculate the 95% regression coefficient and prediction intervals for the relationship between the FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratio and rate constant kep, SigmaPlot version 9 software (Systat Software, Richmond, Calif) was used. P values of less than .05 were indicative of a significant difference, whereas P values of less than .1 were indicative of a trend.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Studies Performed
FDG PET data were available for 19 of 26 patients, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data were available for 25 patients, and immunohistochemistry data were available for 22 patients (Table). In six patients (patients 4, 6, 8, 19, 21, and 24), FDG PET was not clinically indicated according to the attending surgeon, and in one patient (patient 7), no liver metastases were detected with FDG PET. In one patient (patient 14), there was no spleen in the field of view of the MR image. This patient was excluded from the analysis of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake. In two patients, no tumor material was available since surgery was canceled because of irresectable liver metastases (patient 11) or metastases outside the liver (patient 12). In one patient, no tumor material was available because the metastasis was treated with radiofrequency ablation (patient 21). For one of the patients (patient 17), no data regarding tumor hypoxia were available because this patient refused pimonidazole. In two patients (patients 8 and 24), the liver metastases could not be resected; however, biopsy was performed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Patient Characteristics and Assessment Modalities

 
Direct comparison of FDG PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data could be made for 18 patients, comparison of FDG PET and immunohistochemistry data could be made for 15 patients, and comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and immunohistochemistry data could be made for 21 patients. The mean time interval was 35 days ± 8 (standard error of the mean) between FDG PET scanning and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, 50 days ± 10 between FDG PET scanning and surgery, and 12 days ± 2 between dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and surgery. Patients did not receive anticancer therapy between FDG PET scanning, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and surgery, with the exception of patient 1—who received two cycles of 5-fluorouracil and leukovorin—and patient 16—who received one cycle of 5-fluorouracil, leukovorin, and oxaliplatin between FDG PET scanning and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Comparison of Tumor-to-Nontumor Ratio and Rate Constant kep
From the FDG PET images (Fig 1a), the tumor-to-nontumor ratio was calculated for all patients for whom FDG PET data were available (ie, 19 of 26 patients). The mean tumor-to-nontumor ratio of these patients was 2.021 ± .187. On the T1-weighted MR image recorded just before gadopentetate dimeglumine administration, the metastases could easily be detected in all patients for whom dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data were available (ie, 25 of 26 patients) (Fig 1b). The mean rate constant kep of these patients was 0.031 (standard error of the mean < .001). Comparison of the tumor-to-nontumor ratio and rate constant kep showed a trend for higher tumor-to-nontumor ratios at lower rate constant kep values (P = .082; Fig 2). Excluding one observation with a relatively high tumor-to-nontumor ratio (upper open circle in Fig 2) from the analysis resulted in a significant correlation between the tumor-to-nontumor ratio and rate constant kep (P = .049). The omitted patient did not differ from the whole population with respect to age, comorbidity, medication, differentiation grade of the metastasis, or tumor diameter, as measured after resection.



View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. Images obtained in patient 5. (a) Transverse FDG PET image. (b) T1-weighted MR image (50/4.4; flip angle, 90°; section thickness, 7 mm; matrix, 160 x 256; field of view, 263 x 350 mm) shows the same liver metastasis (arrow) to allow direct comparison of FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratio and rate constant kep for the individual metastases. On this image, a region of interest was drawn to delineate the metastasis, which was then applied to (c) the map of the rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake to select the single values of rate constant kep for all tumor pixels.

 


View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. Images obtained in patient 5. (a) Transverse FDG PET image. (b) T1-weighted MR image (50/4.4; flip angle, 90°; section thickness, 7 mm; matrix, 160 x 256; field of view, 263 x 350 mm) shows the same liver metastasis (arrow) to allow direct comparison of FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratio and rate constant kep for the individual metastases. On this image, a region of interest was drawn to delineate the metastasis, which was then applied to (c) the map of the rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake to select the single values of rate constant kep for all tumor pixels.

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1c. Images obtained in patient 5. (a) Transverse FDG PET image. (b) T1-weighted MR image (50/4.4; flip angle, 90°; section thickness, 7 mm; matrix, 160 x 256; field of view, 263 x 350 mm) shows the same liver metastasis (arrow) to allow direct comparison of FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratio and rate constant kep for the individual metastases. On this image, a region of interest was drawn to delineate the metastasis, which was then applied to (c) the map of the rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake to select the single values of rate constant kep for all tumor pixels.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Graph shows the relationship between the tumor to nontumor ratio of FDG uptake and the rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake. The regression line (bold line), 95% confidence interval (curved lines) for means, and 95% prediction interval (dotted lines) for individuals are indicated.

 
Comparison of Hypoxic Fraction, Vascular Density, Tumor-to-Nontumor Ratio, and Rate Constant kep
The mean hypoxic fraction for all liver metastases, computed as the tissue surface area stained with the hypoxic marker relative to the viable tumor surface area, was 0.134 ± 0.013 (Fig 3). No significant correlations were found between hypoxic fraction and FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratio (P = .783) or with kep (P = .442) and vascular density (P = .641).



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. (a) Binary image of a complete tumor slice stained for both hypoxia (green) and vasculature (red). (b) Corresponding hematoxylin-eosin-stained slice (x100 magnification). Note viable tumor tissue (arrows). Line indicates 100 µm.

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. (a) Binary image of a complete tumor slice stained for both hypoxia (green) and vasculature (red). (b) Corresponding hematoxylin-eosin-stained slice (x100 magnification). Note viable tumor tissue (arrows). Line indicates 100 µm.

 
The mean vascular density for all liver metastases, measured as the number of vessels per square millimeter of viable tumor area, was 25.4 mm–2 ± 1.97. A significant positive correlation between vascular density and values of rate constant kep was found (Fig 4), but there was no correlation between vascular density and FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratios (P = .944).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Graph shows relationship between the rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake and vascular density. The regression line (bold line), 95% confidence interval (curved lines) for means, and the 95% prediction interval (dotted lines) for individuals are indicated.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Relation between FDG Tumor-to-Nontumor Ratio and Rate Constant kep
Both FDG PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging are in vivo imaging methods that can provide functional information about tumor tissue. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging allows information on the tumor vascular system to be obtained, which mediates the supply of glucose and oxygen. Other factors that may be of importance for FDG uptake (ie, upregulation of glucose transport proteins, hexokinase, and glycolysis) cannot be assessed with this method and should be investigated in future studies.

Our results showed a negative correlation between tumor-to-nontumor ratios of FDG uptake and gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake rate constants kep in liver metastases. When tumor blood flow is much greater than permeability surface area product, lower values of rate constant kep may indicate a lower permeability surface area product (see formula for calculating rate constant kep in Materials and Methods). When tumor blood flow is much less than permeability surface area product, lower values of rate constant kep may indicate lower tumor blood flow. A lower tumor blood flow, lower permeability, or smaller surface area of tumor blood vessels may all result in a reduced supply of nutrients, such as FDG and oxygen, to the tumor. A reduced supply of nutrients could lead to lower FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratios in the tumor, as was shown in an experimental study in which substrate availability modulated glucose metabolism (35) and would result in a positive correlation between tumor-to-nontumor ratios and rate constant kep. The poorer vascular function, which was reflected by lower values of rate constant kep, however, could lead not only to a reduced supply of nutrients but also to a reduced supply of oxygen. A reduced supply of oxygen would necessitate a higher uptake of glucose to maintain tumor energy levels. This would lead to higher FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratios in the tumor, thus resulting in a negative correlation between rate constant kep and FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratios. Thus, the observed negative correlation between rate constant kep and FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratios suggests that differences in tumor oxygenation rather than differences in FDG delivery are a driving force for FDG uptake in colorectal liver metastases.

Whether FDG delivery or tumor oxygenation are the driving force for FDG uptake may be tumor and even stage dependent. For example, a positive correlation between FDG uptake and the permeability surface area product, as determined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, was found in patients with lung cancer (36) and that between the metabolic rate of FDG and blood flow determined with oxygen 15 water measurements was found in patients with advanced breast cancer (37). Brix et al (38) did not observe a correlation between FDG PET scanning and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters in a group of patients with suspicious breast lesions. Clearly, this group consisted of patients with different stages of breast cancer, which might explain the lack of correlation between FDG PET scanning and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters.

Relation between Hypoxic Fraction, FDG Tumor-to-Nontumor Ratio, and Rate Constant kep
The hypothesis that tumor hypoxia is a driving force for FDG uptake in colorectal liver metastases seems to contradict the observed lack of correlation between FDG uptake and hypoxic fraction in liver metastases, as measured with pimonidazole binding. In this respect, the difference between chronic or diffusion-limited hypoxia, according to the classic model of Thomlinson and Gray (39), and acute or transient hypoxia (40) because of local and temporary fluctuations of tumor blood perfusion may be relevant. Experimental tumor cells in an acutely hypoxic environment may increase their FDG uptake more than twofold (41,42) to survive the temporary decrease in oxygen supply. Decreased cell proliferation has been shown in chronically hypoxic regions (43). This may be interpreted as an energy-saving method to adapt to a reduced supply of oxygen and nutrients. Alternatively, it may be argued that an important part of the chronically hypoxic cell population is becoming necrotic or apoptotic and is, therefore, less active metabolically. In these chronically hypoxic regions, FDG uptake will actually decrease. Thus, hypoxic tumors can be highly metabolic or may have modest glucose metabolism, depending on whether acute or chronic hypoxia plays a major role (44). The discordance of FDG uptake and tumor hypoxia can be specific to tumor type (44), and it may even be heterogeneous within one tumor (45). Both chronically and acutely hypoxic cell regions contribute to the hypoxic fraction measured with pimonidazole binding. This may explain the lack of correlation between FDG uptake and hypoxia in liver metastases in our study.

Relation between Vascular Density, FDG Tumor-to-Nontumor Ratio, and Rate Constant kep
We observed a positive correlation between vascular density and the gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake rate constant kep but not between vascular density and FDG uptake. A positive correlation between microvascular density and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging vascular parameters has been reported by Hawighorst et al (25) for cervical carcinoma, but Su et al (46) did not observe such a correlation in patients with breast cancer. As explained previously, rate constant kep is defined both by the product of permeability and surface area of perfused capillaries and by the tumor blood flow. From this definition, the relationship between the gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake rate constant kep and the vascular density is obvious. It should be noted, however, that in vascular density, both perfused and nonperfused vessels are included. Since mainly the acute closure of the former seems to determine uptake of FDG in colorectal liver metastases, this may explain the lack of correlation between vascular density and FDG uptake, and it underscores the importance of functional in vivo data on the tumor vascular system.

Limitations of the Study
The mean interval between FDG PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and FDG PET and surgery was relatively long in our study. It may be suggested that the lack of correlation between FDG PET and immunohistochemical results was caused by this long interval. However, since it seems unlikely that the correlation between FDG PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data are caused by the long interval between the two examinations, the lack of correlation between FDG PET and immunohistochemical results should be explained by biologic factors, rather than the long interval. Nevertheless, its influence cannot be excluded. Two patients received anticancer therapy between FDG PET scanning and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Although this may have influenced the results, it pertains to a small number of patients.

The mean value of rate constant kep indicates the value of this parameter over the region of interest, but it does not reflect the heterogeneity of a tumor. Currently, statistical analyses, such as functional principal component analysis, are being investigated to further characterize spatial heterogeneity (47). Although tumor heterogeneity was not taken into account in our study, all data are corrected for (gross) necrosis.

It should be noted that an exact one-to-one correlation between FDG PET or dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and immunhistochemistry data was not fully possible, since tissue sections had a size of approximately 5 µm x 5 mm x 5 mm, whereas PET and MR imaging data were obtained from the whole tumor or a large part of the tumor. Also, in two patients, the metastases were not fully removed, and biopsy was performed during surgery. In our study, we assumed that the acquired material was a sufficient representation for the whole tumor. Since the sample size of this study was small, it should be expanded in a future study.

For colorectal liver metastases, a negative relationship was found between the rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake, as determined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and FDG tumor-to-nontumor ratios, as determined with PET scanning. This suggests that in liver metastases, differences in acute tumor hypoxia—which are caused by differences in functional tumor vasculature—constitute a driving force for FDG uptake. The observed correlation between vascular density and the rate constant kep of gadopentetate dimeglumine uptake, but not with tumor-to-nontumor ratios, emphasizes the potential of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to enable measurement of tumor vascularity in vivo and its additional value compared with ex vivo methods.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Abbreviations: FDG = fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose

2 Current address: Department of Psychonomics, University Utrecht, the Netherlands Back

Authors stated no financial relationship to disclose.

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, H.W.M.v.L.; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all authors; approval of final version of submitted manuscript, all authors; literature research, H.W.M.v.L., L.F.d.G., B.W., M.R., J.H.A.M.K., A.J.v.d.K., W.J.G.O., A.H.; clinical studies, H.W.M.v.L., L.F.d.G., B.W., J.L., J.H.A.M.K., T.R.; statistical analysis, H.W.M.v.L., P.F.M.K.; and manuscript editing, H.W.M.v.L., L.F.d.G., B.W., M.R., J.H.A.M.K., P.F.M.K., C.J.A.P., W.J.G.O., A.H.


    References
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956;123:309–314.[Free Full Text]
  2. Strauss LG, Clorius JH, Schlag P, et al. Recurrence of colorectal tumors: PET evaluation. Radiology 1989;170:329–332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Guillem JG, Puig-La Calle J Jr, Akhurst T, et al. Prospective assessment of primary rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:18–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Ruers TJ, Langenhoff BS, Neeleman N, et al. Value of positron emission tomography with [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:388–395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lai DT, Fulham M, Stephen MS, et al. The role of whole-body positron emission tomography with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose in identifying operable colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. Arch Surg 1996;131:703–707.[Abstract]
  6. Findlay M, Young H, Cunningham D, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of tumor metabolism using fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer liver metastases: correlation with tumor response to fluorouracil. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:700–708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pauwels EK, Ribeiro MJ, Stoot JH, McCready VR, Bourguignon M, Maziere B. FDG accumulation and tumor biology. Nucl Med Biol 1998;25:317–322.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Semenza GL. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1: mechanisms and consequences. Biochem Pharmacol 2000;59:47–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Sakurai A, et al. Correlation of Glut-1 glucose transporter expression with. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:1778–1785.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Bos R, Der Hoeven JJ, van Der WE, et al. Biologic correlates of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:379–387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kunkel M, Reichert TE, Benz P, et al. Overexpression of Glut-1 and increased glucose metabolism in tumors are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97:1015–1024.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Avril N, Menzel M, Dose J, et al. Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. J Nucl Med 2001;42:9–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Marom EM, Aloia TA, Moore MB, et al. Correlation of FDG-PET imaging with Glut-1 and Glut-3 expression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2001;33:99–107.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Brown RS, Goodman TM, Zasadny KR, Greenson JK, Wahl RL. Expression of hexokinase II and Glut-1 in untreated human breast cancer. Nucl Med Biol 2002;29:443–453.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Utriainen M, Metsahonkala L, Salmi TT, et al. Metabolic characterization of childhood brain tumors: comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C-methionine positron emission tomography. Cancer 2002;95:1376–1386.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. I. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:357–367.
  17. Larsson HB, Stubgaard M, Frederiksen JL, Jensen M, Henriksen O, Paulson OB. Quantitation of blood-brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium-DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors. Magn Reson Med 1990;16:117–131.[Medline]
  18. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994;193:777–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Padhani AR, Husband JE. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies in oncology with an emphasis on quantification, validation and human studies. Clin Radiol 2001;56:607–620.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Reddick WE, Taylor JS, Fletcher BD. Dynamic MR imaging (DEMRI) of microcirculation in bone sarcoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:277–285.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Mayr NA, Hawighorst H, Yuh WT, Essig M, Magnotta VA, Knopp MV. MR microcirculation assessment in cervical cancer: correlations with histomorphological tumor markers and clinical outcome. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:267–276.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Devries AF, Griebel J, Kremser C, et al. Tumor microcirculation evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predicts therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma. Cancer Res 2001;61:2513–2516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. George ML, Dzik-Jurasz AS, Padhani AR, et al. Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001;88:1628–1636.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Hoskin PJ, Saunders MI, Goodchild K, Powell ME, Taylor NJ, Baddeley H. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance scanning as a predictor of response to accelerated radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. Br J Radiol 1999;72:1093–1098.[Abstract]
  25. Hawighorst H, Weikel W, Knapstein PG, et al. Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome. Clin Cancer Res 1998;4:2305–2312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hittmair K, Gomiscek G, Langenberger K, Recht M, Imhof H, Kramer J. Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:567–571.[Medline]
  27. Van Laarhoven HW, Rijpkema M, Punt CJ, et al. Method for quantitation of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in colorectal liver metastases. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:315–320.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223–232.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Durand RE, Raleigh JA. Identification of nonproliferating but viable hypoxic tumor cells in vivo. Cancer Res 1998;58:3547–3550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Arteel GE, Thurman RG, Yates JM, Raleigh JA. Evidence that hypoxia markers detect oxygen gradients in liver: pimonidazole and retrograde perfusion of rat liver. Br J Cancer 1995;72:889–895.[Medline]
  31. Raleigh JA, Chou SC, Arteel GE, Horsman MR. Comparisons among pimonidazole binding, oxygen electrode measurements, and radiation response in C3H mouse tumors. Radiat Res 1999;151:580–589.[Medline]
  32. Azuma C, Raleigh JA, Thrall DE. Longevity of pimonidazole adducts in spontaneous canine tumors as an estimate of hypoxic cell lifetime. Radiat Res 1997;148:35–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Rijken PF, Bernsen HJ, van der Kogel AJ. Application of an image analysis system to the quantitation of tumor perfusion and vascularity in human glioma xenografts. Microvasc Res 1995;50:141–153.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Bussink J, Kaanders JH, Rijken PF, Martindale CA, van der Kogel AJ. Multiparameter analysis of vasculature, perfusion and proliferation in human tumour xenografts. Br J Cancer 1998;77:57–64.[Medline]
  35. Kallinowski F, Vaupel P, Runkel S, et al. Glucose uptake, lactate release, ketone body turnover, metabolic micromilieu, and pH distributions in human breast cancer xenografts in nude rats. Cancer Res 1988;48:7264–7272.[Medline]
  36. Hunter GJ, Hamberg LM, Choi N, Jain RK, McCloud T, Fischman AJ. Dynamic T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in patients with lung cancer: correlating vascular physiology with glucose metabolism. Clin Cancer Res 1998;4:949–955.[Abstract]
  37. Mankoff DA, Dunnwald LK, Gralow JR, et al. Blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer: relationship to response to therapy. J Nucl Med 2002;43:500–509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Brix G, Henze M, Knopp MV, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetic MRI and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2001;11:2058–2070.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Thomlinson RH, Gray LH. The histological structure of some human lung cancers and the possible implications for radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 1955;9:539–549.[Medline]
  40. Brown JM. Evidence for acutely hypoxic cells in mouse tumours, and a possible mechanism of reoxygenation. Br J Radiol 1979;52:650–656.[Medline]
  41. Burgman P, Odonoghue JA, Humm JL, Ling CC. Hypoxia-induced increase in FDG uptake in MCF7 cells. J Nucl Med 2001;42:170–175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Clavo AC, Brown RS, Wahl RL. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human cancer cell lines is increased by hypoxia. J Nucl Med 1995;36:1625–1632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Evans SM, Hahn SM, Magarelli DP, Koch CJ. Hypoxic heterogeneity in human tumors: EF5 binding, vasculature, necrosis, and proliferation. Am J Clin Oncol 2001;24:467–472.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Rajendran JG, Mankoff DA, O'Sullivan F, et al. Hypoxia and glucose metabolism in malignant tumors: evaluation by [18F]fluoromisonidazole and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:2245–2252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Walenta S, Snyder S, Haroon ZA, et al. Tissue gradients of energy metabolites mirror oxygen tension gradients in a rat mammary carcinoma model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:840–848.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Su MY, Cheung YC, Fruehauf JP, et al. Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:467–477.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. O'Connor EL, Fieller NJR, Holmes AP, Waterton J. Improvements on histogram analysis for statistical testing of spatially heterogenous changes within ROI (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004;140.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Bisdas, K. Spicer, and Z. Rumboldt
Whole-Tumor Perfusion CT Parameters and Glucose Metabolism Measurements in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Pilot Study Using Combined Positron-Emission Tomography/CT Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1376 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Miles, C. Keith, H. W. M. van Laarhoven, L.-F. de Geus-Oei, B. Wiering, J. Lok, M. Rijpkema, J. H. A. M. Kaanders, P. F. M. Krabbe, T. Ruers, et al.
Gadopentetate Dimeglumine and FDG Uptake in Liver Metastases
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 319 - 320.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. H. Khandani and R. C. Semelka
Can the Relation between Gadopentetate Dimeglumine and FDG Uptake in Colorectal Liver Metastases Be Used Clinically?
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heerschap, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heerschap, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE