Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2392051872
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, V. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiology 2006;239:309-310.)
© RSNA, 2006


Science to Practice

Science to Practice: Can MR Imaging Replace Liver Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Early Fibrosis?

Vivian S. Lee, MD, PhD

Department of Radiology,
New York University Medical Center
110 W 3rd St, Suite 1401
New York, NY 10016
Vivian.lee@med.nyu.edu

SUMMARY

Aguirre et al found that the combined use of gadolinium-based and SPIO contrast agents yields high sensitivity (93%) for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. Their findings lead the way for further developments to improve the sensitivity of noninvasive imaging methods for diagnosing cirrhosis. With continued advances in this field, liver biopsy may someday become obsolete.

THE SETTING

The estimated prevalences of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in the United States are 4.9% (1) and 1.8% (2), respectively, and rising. Approximately 5%–10% of individuals infected with viral hepatitis B and over 50% of those infected with viral hepatitis C become chronically infected (3,4). Like other causes of cirrhosis, chronic viral infection can lead to complications such as portal hypertension, end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In chronic viral hepatitis, the definitive evaluation of disease severity, which includes an assessment of fibrosis, relies on histologic findings. However, liver biopsy is an invasive and expensive procedure with a measurable risk of complications, poor patient tolerance, and possible interpretation and sampling errors. The development of noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis, by facilitating an earlier diagnosis and improved monitoring of disease progression, could obviate biopsy and may have important clinical consequences.


Figure 1
View larger version (183K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
 
In this issue of Radiology, Aguirre et al (5) show that by using a combination of gadolinium chelate and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) contrast agents, one can achieve an accuracy of greater than 90% for the diagnosis of fibrosis compared with the accuracy achieved by using histopathologic analysis (5). Their study results demonstrate the synergistic effects of the two commercially available contrast agents for the detection of fibrosis at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

THE SCIENCE

Gadolinium chelates show a delayed distribution into fibrotic tissue, thereby causing delayed enhancement of hepatic septal fibrosis at T1-weighted imaging. SPIOs, on the other hand, accumulate within the reticuloendothelial cells of the liver, causing T2* shortening and signal intensity loss; these changes are particularly well seen on gradient-echo images obtained with longer echo times. With SPIOs, fibrotic bands are spared. When both agents are administered and imaging is performed by using a gradient-echo sequence with an echo time of about 4.8 msec (at 1.5 T), the synergistic effects become readily apparent: The gadolinium-based contrast agents enhance the fibrosis, while the SPIOs darken the spared liver. While SPIOs alone showed high diagnostic accuracy (93% for total score based on reticularity and nodularity) compared with histopathologic scores of fibrosis, Aguirre et al (5) found that the combination of gadolinium-based and SPIO contrast agents yielded superior results overall, taking into consideration reticularity, nodularity, contrast-to-noise ratios, and corrected coefficient of variation scores (see table 8 in Aguirre et al article). Their results are compatible with a growing body of literature that demonstrates improved detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with use of the combination of agents based on a similar mechanism: The conspicuity of gadolinium-enhanced lesions is increased in the setting of decreased signal intensity from the uninvolved liver parenchyma following SPIO injection (6,7).

THE PRACTICE

Clinical Use:
To date, conventional imaging techniques such as ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and MR imaging have proved to be relatively insensitive for the diagnosis of mild fibrosis associated with early cirrhosis. CT and MR imaging typically involve the use of the morphologic consequences of fibrosis and the stigmata of portal hypertension to diagnose cirrhosis. The diagnosis of early fibrosis, therefore, relies on liver biopsy, which itself is invasive and imperfect owing to limited sampling of liver tissue. While the combined use of two contrast agents may be considered prohibitively expensive for routine use, the findings of Aguirre et al support the selective application of this method where the alternative may be a more invasive and riskier biopsy procedure (5). In addition, this noninvasive imaging method provides the added advantage of evaluation of the entire liver, enabling more accurate assessment of disease severity in cases where the fibrosis is not uniform across the entire organ.

Future Opportunities and Challenges:
In addition to the use of exogenous contrast agents, MR imaging offers alternative approaches to the early diagnosis of cirrhosis and fibrosis that remain to be explored more fully. Diffusion-weighted imaging, which is widely used in brain imaging, may have the potential to depict subtle restriction of water diffusion in patients with chronic hepatitis before gross morphologic changes become evident (8). With early fibrosis, deposition of collagen in the space of Disse and alteration of sinusoidal architecture result in a decrease in portal venous flow, which is counteracted by an increase in hepatic arterial flow, a process known as the hepatic arterial buffer response (9). Measurements of these perfusion changes with techniques such as gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging offer yet another strategy for detecting the early pathophysiologic changes of fibrosis and cirrhosis (9). How these alternative approaches compare to or complement the combined contrast agent method described in this issue of Radiology remains to be determined.

FOOTNOTES

See also the article by Aguirre et al in this issue.

References

  1. McQuillan GM, Coleman PJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Moyer LA, Lambert SB, Margolis HS. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1976 through 1994. Am J Public Health 1999;89:14–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Alter MJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Nainan OV, et al. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994. N Engl J Med 1999;341:556–562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Shapiro CN. Epidemiology of hepatitis B. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993;12:433–437.[Medline]
  4. Alberti A, Chemello L, Benvegnu L. Natural history of hepatitis C. J Hepatol 1999;31(suppl 1):17–24.
  5. Aguirre DA, Behling CA, Alpert E, Hassanein TI, Sirlin CB. Liver fibrosis: noninvasive diagnosis with double contrast material–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2006;239:425–437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kim MJ, Kim JH, Chung JJ, Park MS, Lim JS, Oh YT. Focal hepatic lesions: detection and characterization with combination gadolinium- and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003;228:719–726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kwak HS, Lee JM, Kim CS. Preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of combined contrast-enhanced MR imaging and combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. Eur Radiol 2004;14:447–457.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Taouli B, Martin AJ, Qayyum A, et al. Parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:677–680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Pandharipande PV, Krinsky GA, Rusinek H, Lee VS. Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals. Radiology 2005;234:661–673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Liver Fibrosis: Noninvasive Diagnosis with Double Contrast Material–enhanced MR Imaging
Diego A. Aguirre, Cynthia A. Behling, Elliot Alpert, Tarek I. Hassanein, and Claude B. Sirlin
Radiology 2006 239: 425-437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, V. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE