Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Terms and Conditions for Use


Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


View larger version (165K)


Figure 3: Average ROC curves for two-view observer study for three reading modes: independent (No CAD- Ind) (Az = 0.83), sequential without CAD (No CAD-Seq) (Az = 0.82), and sequential with CAD (With CAD-Seq) (Az = 0.87). The difference was significant for sequential with CAD mode versus independent mode (P = .03, Student paired t test; P < .05, Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method) and for sequential with CAD mode versus sequential without CAD mode (P < .01, Student paired t test; P < .01, Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method). Dashed line at true-positive fraction of 0.90 shows threshold above which Az(0.90) was calculated. For the two-view observer study, Az(0.90) was 0.35 for independent mode, 0.30 for sequential without CAD mode, and 0.49 for sequential with CAD mode. The difference was significant for sequential with CAD mode versus sequential without CAD mode (P < .01, Student paired t test).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE