Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2403060761
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahmood, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahmood, U.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiology 2006;240:619-620.)
© RSNA, 2006


Science to Practice

Can a Clinically Used Chemoembolization Vehicle Improve Transgene Delivery?

Umar Mahmood, MD, PhD

Center for Molecular Imaging Research,
Harvard Medical School,
Massachusetts General Hospital,
185 Cambridge St,
Rm 8226,
Boston, MA 02114,
mahmood@helix.mgh.harvard.edu

SUMMARY

Kim et al have demonstrated in an animal model that focal transgene delivery to hepatic tumors is improved when performed with a clinically used chemoembolization vehicle.

THE SETTING

Cancer treatments often involve a combination of therapies with diverse and complementary mechanisms of action that act synergistically to kill tumors. Interventional radiologists are directly involved in the application of many focally administered treatments, including chemotherapy, embolic therapy, and radiofrequency ablation. The preferential insertion of genes into tumors has undergone increasing evaluation to determine if such techniques can augment the efficacy of more traditional tumoricidal methods. In this issue of Radiology, Kim et al (1) evaluated the ability of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) techniques and clinically used agents to improve focal tumor delivery of exogenous genes in an animal model of hepatic carcinoma.

THE SCIENCE

There are more than 1000 clinical gene therapy trials that have been completed or are underway (2). More than half of these trials focus on enhancing cancer therapy. One approach involves preferential tumor expression of the commonly used suicide gene, herpes simplex virus-1 thymidine kinase (HSV-1-tk). After there is focal expression of HSV-1-tk, systemic administration of the approved antiviral drug ganciclovir preferentially kills the transfected cells. Because positron emission tomography (PET) imagable analogs (such as 2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-ß-D-arabinofuranosyl-5-iodouracil) exist, it is possible to image the location and extent of transgene expression after vector delivery in patients with gliomas prior to treatment with ganciclovir (3). Other gene therapy approaches, such as focal expression of tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), synergistically enhance the proapoptotic effects of chemotherapy.


Figure 1
View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
 
To improve tumor killing while minimizing morbidity, much effort has been focused on improving the target-to-background ratio of transgene delivery and expression. There are a variety of methods to deliver exogenous genes into the tumor, including a diverse range of viruses, liposomes, lipofection agents, or the use of naked DNA (4). Viral vectors are typically highly efficient at transfecting cells but may induce an immune response. Nonviral vectors are typically much less efficient but are simpler, less costly to make, less likely to result in an immune response, easier to modify, and much less restricted to the size of DNA that can be delivered. Systemic or venous administration of vectors for hepatic uptake usually results in a high percentage of delivery to Kupffer cells. Selective intraarterial hepatic administration decreases this uptake and additionally shifts delivery from hepatocytes to tumors because, compared with the adjacent parenchyma, hepatic tumors receive a larger portion of their total blood supply from the hepatic artery.

In their study, Kim et al (1) used the preferential arterial supply of hepatic tumors to their advantage for delivering a marker gene. Importantly, they demonstrated that they could overcome the low efficiency of delivery in their nonviral system by using a method that is already used in clinical practice to focally administer and image chemoembolic therapy to hepatic tumors. The authors systematically showed that both the lipophilic and hydrophilic components of the mixture were needed for optimal transgene expression in the tumors and that very little expression was seen outside the tumor, including in the ipsilateral hepatic lobe.

THE PRACTICE

Clinical use:
The use of chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma has had mixed results clinically but may show a benefit in certain groups (5,6). Improvement in the efficacy of focal treatment by adding exogenous genes, such as HSV-1-tk or TRAIL, may be possible. Importantly, all of the components, including the typical therapeutic transgenes, chemotherapeutics, and iodinized oil emulsion, have been previously used in humans. Interventional radiologists performing such chemoembolization procedures will use the same method as TACE, except that the exogenous DNA and a stabilizing agent will be added to the mixture prior to injection. In addition to standard anatomic follow-up imaging to assess tumor shrinkage, there may be earlier molecular imaging (with either PET or magnetic resonance imaging) to assess the location and extent of transgene expression (3,7).

Future opportunities and challenges:
The work presented by Kim et al demonstrates the improved delivery of transgenes to hepatic tumors when combined with a clinically used vehicle for chemoembolization. The next step prior to human use is to show in animal models that there is a benefit of adding a focal gene therapy component compared with the standard combinations used today in TACE. Additional evaluation to see how long the gene expression lasts would be useful to optimize the timing of administration of drugs for which tumoricidal efficacy may be enhanced by the transgenes. Finally, showing that the method works in the setting of cirrhosis is important because many of the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma have cirrhosis. Radiologists will have a key role in the delivery and evaluation of such therapies as they are brought into practice.

FOOTNOTES

See also the article by Kim et al in this issue.

References

  1. Kim YI, Chung JW, Park JH, Han JK, Hong JW, Chung H. Intraarterial gene delivery in rabbit hepatic tumors: transfection with nonviral vector by using iodized oil emulsion. Radiology 2006;240(3):771–777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide. Journal of Gene Medicine Clinical Trial Web site. http://www.wiley.co.uk/genetherapy/clinical/. Accessed April 10, 2006.
  3. Voges J, Reszka R, Gossmann A, et al. Imaging-guided convection-enhanced delivery and gene therapy of glioblastoma. Ann Neurol 2003;54:479–487.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Shah K, Jacobs A, Breakefield XO, Weissleder R. Molecular imaging of gene therapy for cancer. Gene Ther 2004;11:1175–1187.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire. A comparison of lipiodol chemoembolization and conservative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1256–1261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Camma C, Schepis F, Orlando A, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology 2002;224:47–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Weissleder R, Moore A, Mahmood U, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of transgene expression. Nat Med 2000;6:351–355.[CrossRef][Medline]

Related Article

Intraarterial Gene Delivery in Rabbit Hepatic Tumors: Transfection with Nonviral Vector by Using Iodized Oil Emulsion
Young Il Kim, Jin Wook Chung, Jae Hyung Park, Joon Koo Han, Jung Wan Hong, and Hesson Chung
Radiology 2006 240: 771-777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahmood, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahmood, U.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE