Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 14, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2411050347
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2411050347v1
241/1/298    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gandini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Simonetti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gandini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Simonetti, G.
(Radiology 2006;241:298-305.)
© RSNA, 2006


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Patency and Clinical Outcome in Patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome: Covered versus Uncovered Stents1

Roberto Gandini, MD, Daniel Konda, MD and Giovanni Simonetti, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy. Received April 5, 2005; revision requested June 16; revision received October 5; accepted November 4; final version accepted December 1. Address correspondence to D.K. (e-mail: danielkonda{at}yahoo.com).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Purpose: To retrospectively compare primary patency and reintervention rates, clinical outcome, and improvement in hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh score) in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using bare stents or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stents.

Materials and Methods: Approval of study and treatment protocol and waiver of informed consent for the retrospective study were obtained from institutional review board. Informed consent was obtained from each patient before procedure. Four male and nine female consecutive patients (mean age, 35.7 years) with Budd-Chiari syndrome treated with TIPS from January 1994 to November 2003 were included. In six patients, TIPS creation was performed with bare stents (group A). After April 2001, TIPS creation was performed in seven patients with expanded PTFE-covered stent-grafts (group B). Follow-up (group A mean, 22.7 months ± 10.53 [standard deviation]; group B mean, 23.1 months ± 7.81) was performed at 7 days, 30 days, and 3 months and subsequently every 3 months. Liver function was evaluated every 3 months. Primary end points were 6- and 12-month TIPS patency rates. Secondary end points were reintervention rate and clinical outcome. Patency rates were estimated (Kaplan-Meier method) and compared (log-rank test). Continuous (Mann-Whitney U test) and categoric ({chi}2 test) data were compared. Significant differences before and after treatment were determined (Wilcoxon test).

Results: Mean primary patency duration was 4.46 months ± 3.40 in group A and 22.29 months ± 8.15 in group B. In group B, a significant increase in primary patency rate (100% and 85.7% vs 16.7% and 0% at 6 and 12 months; P < .001, log-rank test) and a decrease in reintervention rate (0.29 ± 0.49 vs 6.17 ± 1.72, P < .001) were observed. Both groups had a significantly decreased Child-Pugh score; group B had a more persistent and significantly higher reduction.

Conclusion: Expanded PTFE-covered stent-grafts significantly increased primary patency rate of TIPS in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, with reduced reintervention rate and prolonged clinical improvement.

© RSNA, 2006


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Thrombotic obstruction of the suprahepatic venous tract leads to the progressive instauration of sinusoidal and portal hypertension. Free radicals released by hypoxic sinusoidal lining cells cause necrosis of centrilobular hepatocytes, and the necrosis results in centrilobular fibrosis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and finally cirrhosis of the liver (1).

Depending on the rapidity of suprahepatic venous obstruction and on the presence of collateral veins, which decongest the hepatic sinusoids, Budd-Chiari syndrome can be classified into four categories: fulminant, acute, subacute, and chronic. In the less common fulminant form, patients develop hepatic encephalopathy within 8 weeks from the instauration of jaundice. The acute form, which is not associated with the development of collateral veins, is characterized by intractable ascites and hepatocellular necrosis. Patients with the most frequent subacute form have collateral veins and, thereby, have minimal ascites and hepatocellular necrosis. The only clinical manifestations of the chronic form are those related to the complications of cirrhosis (2).

In patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, abdominal pain, hepatomegaly, and ascites usually manifest. Esophageal varices and splenomegaly are observed in the chronic form, and jaundice is usually present in the fulminant and acute forms. Medical treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome includes anticoagulation therapy, maintenance of the international normalized ratio between 2.0 and 2.5, and treatment of ascites. Treatment that includes thrombolysis with urokinase or tissue plasminogen activator is used in patients who have the fulminant form.

In the past decades, surgical portosystemic derivation has represented the only therapeutic option for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome that is refractory to medical treatment. Successful treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome by using a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was described in 1993 by Peltzer et al (3) and Ochs et al (4). TIPS creation with the use of bare stents is usually feasible in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome; however, it is associated with a high rate of early occlusion that requires repeated revisions of the stent to maintain patency. TIPS creation with the use of bare stents significantly improves hepatic synthetic dysfunction and is best suited as a bridge to orthotopic liver transplantation (5,6). A significant improvement in the patency rates has been reported with the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent-grafts for TIPS creation in patients with ascites and/or variceal bleeding (7). In a recent study (8), the researchers reported high 1-year primary patency rates and fewer reinterventions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome who were treated with TIPS by using expanded PTFE-covered stent-grafts.

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare primary patency and reintervention rates, clinical outcome, and improvement in hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh score) in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome who underwent TIPS creation with bare stents or expanded PTFE-covered stents.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
A retrospective study was conducted in 13 (four male and nine female) consecutive patients (mean age, 35.7 years; range, 17–65 years) affected with Budd-Chiari syndrome who were treated with TIPS between January 1994 and November 2003 at our institution. All patients who were referred for treatment were included in this study. The institutional review board gave full approval and waived informed consent for our retrospective study and approved our protocol and the stents used for TIPS creation. Written patient informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to intervention. Patient numbers refer to the enrollment numbers assigned in a chronologic order.

Patient Population
The diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome was established by using ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients had acute or subacute Budd-Chiari syndrome and were referred for treatment for medically intractable ascites. The cause of Budd-Chiari syndrome was polycythemia vera (patients 1, 4, 7, 8, and 11), osteomyelosclerosis (patients 5 and 9), paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (patients 10 and 12), antithrombin III deficiency (patient 2), protein S deficiency (patient 3), or idiopathic disease (patients 6 and 13).

Serum bilirubin and albumin levels were assessed in all patients prior to intervention. Values for prothrombin time measured as a percentage of a reference sample (Normotest; Baxter Immuno, Vienna, Austria) were normal in four patients and below average in nine patients (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Laboratory and Clinical Data

 
Bacteriologic examination of ascitic fluid and assessment of C-reactive peptide levels prior to intervention yielded negative findings in all patients.

TIPS Creation
TIPS creation was performed by one author (R.G.) who had 3 and 10 years of experience with the procedure in 1994 and 2001, respectively.

In the first six (two male and four female) patients (mean age, 33.7 years ± 12.41 [standard deviation]) with Budd-Chiari syndrome who were treated at our institution, TIPS creation was performed with the use of uncovered self-expanding stents (Wallstent; Boston Scientific/Medi-tech, Natick, Mass) (group A). From April 2001, because of the poor initial results with bare stents, TIPS creation was performed in seven (two male and five female) patients (mean age, 37.4 years ± 13.48) by using expanded PTFE-covered self-expanding nitinol stent-grafts (Viatorr; W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) (group B).

In both groups, TIPS creation was performed with direct puncture of a portal vein from the intrahepatic portion of the inferior vena cava by using a Rösch-Uchida TIPS puncture set (Cook, Bloomington, Ind). After puncture, portal anatomy was assessed by using portal venography, and the intrahepatic tract was dilated with a 10-mm-diameter balloon catheter. Stents were deployed and covered the entire intrahepatic tract.

In group A patients, two 10-mm-diameter and 6-cm-long Wallstents were deployed in a coaxial fashion. In group B, 10-mm-diameter Viatorr stent-grafts with an 8-cm-long expanded PTFE covered portion and a 2-cm-long uncovered portion were used. In six patients (patients 7, 8, and 10–13), two stent-grafts were deployed coaxially with the uncovered portion of the proximal stent-graft inserted into the covered portion of the distal stent-graft, thus leaving no bare segments in the TIPS. The uncovered portion of the distal stent-graft was placed in the portal confluence. In patient 9, a single stent-graft was used (Fig 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1: Patient 9. TIPS creation with 10-mm-diameter Viatorr stent-graft. Intraprocedural venograms in 30° left anterior oblique projection show, A, positioning of stent-graft with the distal end placed through the left portal vein at the portal confluence and, B, balloon dilatation of deployed stent-graft. C, Postprocedural venogram in the same projection as A shows patent TIPS with complete expanded PTFE coverage from inferior vena cava to left portal vein and distal uncovered region at portal confluence. Multidetector CT, D, multiplanar reconstruction and, E, volume-rendered reconstruction in same projection as A at 27-month follow-up show normally patent TIPS.

 
Stents were dilated by using a 10-mm-diameter balloon catheter. Mean atrial and portal vein pressures were assessed prior to and after TIPS creation. After shunt creation, the desired portosystemic pressure gradient was 12 mm Hg.

Medication
Perioperative prophylaxis included intravenous administration of 2 mg/d of ceftriaxone (Rocephin; Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland), which was started 72 hours before the procedure and continued for 48 hours afterward.

Patients received 5000 IU of heparin (Epsoclar; Biologici Italia Laboratories, Milan, Italy) intravenously after the portal vein was punctured, and heparin therapy was continued for 48 hours (1000 IU/h) after the procedure. Subsequently, anticoagulation therapy with warfarin (Coumadin; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY) at a 2.0–2.5 international normalized ratio was maintained for life.

Follow-up
Follow-up was performed with Doppler US at 7 days, 30 days, and 3 months after the procedure and subsequently every 3 months. Liver function was evaluated every 3 months.

Reduction of in-stent blood flow velocity at Doppler US or clinical relapse with recurrence of ascites was further investigated with a hemodynamic study for assessment of the portosystemic pressure gradient and venography. Indication for TIPS revision was considered to be a portosystemic pressure gradient higher than 12 mm Hg or stent occlusion.

TIPS Revision
TIPS revision was performed by one author (R.G.). TIPS recanalization was performed through a transjugular approach by using a 7-F-diameter 25-cm-long introducer sheath (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), a stiff hydrophilic guide wire (Terumo), and a multipurpose (Torcon NB Advantage; William Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) or Cobra catheter (Radiofocus Glidecath; Terumo). Dilatation was performed by using 10-mm-diameter balloon catheters.

Revision with stents was performed in group A by using a 10-mm-diameter bare Wallstents (Fig 2). One revision in patient 6 was performed with a 10-mm-diameter expanded PTFE-covered Viatorr stent-graft.


Figure 2
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2: Patient 4. Occluded TIPS (Wallstent) revision 10 months after creation. A–C, Intraprocedural 30° left anterior oblique venograms show, A, catheterization of occluded TIPS, B, balloon dilatation of stent-graft with 10-mm-diameter balloon catheter, and C, positioning of additional Wallstent. D, Postprocedural venogram in same projection as in A–C shows decompression of portal system after TIPS revision.

 
Anticoagulation therapy was performed with intravenous administration of 5000 IU of heparin during the procedure, followed by continuous heparin therapy (1000 IU/h) for 48 hours afterward. Anticoagulation was maintained with administration of warfarin (2.0–2.5 international normalized ratio) for life.

Study End Points
The primary end points of this study were the 6- and 12-month primary TIPS patency rates. In patients who did not undergo TIPS revision during follow-up, primary patency was assumed to be the duration of TIPS patency from its creation to the last US documentation.

Secondary end points were rate of reintervention and clinical outcome. Clinical outcome was defined as the number of clinical relapses in each group and improvement in the Child-Pugh score.

The mean reduction of the portosystemic pressure gradient at the time of TIPS creation also was evaluated for both patient groups.

Statistical Analysis
Adequacy of the sample sizes was determined by using an {alpha} value of .05 and a statistical power of 95%. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Categoric data are expressed as percentages. Actuarial rates of shunt patency were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared in the two patient groups by using the log-rank test.

The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous data, and the {chi}2 test was used to compare categoric values. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine statistically significant differences before and after treatment. A statistically significant difference was established at P < .05.

Statistical analysis was performed by using software (SPSS, version 13.0; SPSS, Chicago, Ill). All statistical analyses were performed by one author (D.K.) and a statistician.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
TIPS Creation
TIPS creation was technically successful in all patients (groups A and B). The mean portosystemic pressure gradient was reduced from 24.1 mm Hg ± 1.55 to 8.3 mm Hg ± 1.34 in group A and from 26.6 mm Hg ± 2.19 to 7.9 mm Hg ± 0.99 in group B.

Follow-up and TIPS Revision
Prompt clinical improvement with resolution of ascites was achieved in all patients. Patient 1 developed ascites 7 days after the procedure. Doppler US revealed an in-stent thrombosis that was treated with the coaxial insertion of an additional Wallstent.

All shunts with bare stents (group A) became dysfunctional, with a mean duration of primary patency of 4.46 months ± 3.40. Six- and 12-month primary patency rates for group A patients were 16.7% and 0%, respectively (Table 2, Fig 3). During a mean follow-up of 22.7 months ± 10.53, an overall number of 13 revisions with stents (mean, 2.2 ± 0.41) and 24 balloon dilatation procedures (mean, 4.0 ± 1.30) were performed (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Primary Patency Rates at 6 and 12 Months

 

Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier curve in groups A (Wallstent) and B (Viatorr) shows significantly higher primary patency rates in group B versus group A patients (100% and 85.7% vs 16.7% and 0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively; P < .001, log-rank test).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Follow-up: Primary TIPS Patency and Revisions

 
Patient 1 developed in-stent thrombosis 7 days after TIPS creation. This thrombosis was treated with coaxial insertion of an additional Wallstent. After repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to maintain the patency of the TIPS, in-stent thrombosis recurred 5 months later. Recanalization of the TIPS was attempted by using balloon dilatation, which was unsuccessful. Because this patient had a stenosis of the distal inferior vena cava, it was thought that the TIPS dysfunction might have been facilitated by a reduced caval venous flow. The stenosis of the inferior vena cava was thereby treated with a Wallstent. The subsequent balloon dilatation of the TIPS yielded an optimal portosystemic pressure gradient (Fig 4). Despite repeated TIPS revisions, worsening of liver function occurred, and a mesocaval shunt was surgically created in this patient at 7 months.


Figure 4
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4: Patient 1. TIPS occlusion 5 months after creation and revision. A, Venogram in 30° left anterior oblique projection shows occlusion of shunt. B, Frontal radioscopic image shows balloon dilatation of shunt. C, Frontal venogram shows absence of flow in the shunt and stenosis of inferior vena cava (arrow). D, Venogram in same projection as A after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with Wallstent shows resolution of the stenosis and a fully patent shunt.

 
The deterioration of liver dysfunction led to orthotopic liver transplantation in patients 2 and 5 at 37 and 21 months, respectively, whereas patient 3 died of liver insufficiency at 12 months. Patient 4 was lost to follow-up at 31 months after refusal of further treatment. In patient 6, the shunt was revised by using a Wallstent 6 months after the procedure. One month later, the TIPS reoccluded and was revised with a Viatorr stent-graft. The TIPS of this patient required no further revisions and was normally patent 28 months after its insertion.

In group B, during a mean follow-up of 23.1 months ± 7.81, a balloon angioplasty procedure was performed in only patients 10 and 11, with increased in-stent flow velocity at the 21- and 15-month, respectively, Doppler US follow-up. No revisions with stents were required (Table 3). Six- and 12-month primary patency rates for group B patients were 100% and 85.7%, respectively (Table 2, Fig 3).

No hepatic encephalopathy was observed periprocedurally and during follow-up, and no variceal bleeding occurred in patients with occluded stents.

Clinical Outcome
During follow-up, clinical relapses were observed in all group A patients (16 episodes). No clinical relapses occurred in group B patients. A significant decrease in the Child-Pugh score was observed in both groups after treatment. A more persistent and significantly higher reduction of the Child-Pugh score, however, was observed in group B patients (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Child-Pugh Score Variations during Follow-up and Significant Differences before and after Treatment and between Groups

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
For decades, surgical portosystemic derivation has represented the only therapeutic alternative in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome that is refractory to medical treatment. Surgery, however, is associated with a high perioperative death rate (3%) and complication rate (14%) (9,10).

Orthotopic liver transplantation, which is considered the only truly curative treatment for Budd-Chiari syndrome, is the first-line treatment in patients with the fulminant form of Budd-Chiari syndrome or end-stage chronic liver disease. Prognosis of patients who undergo orthotopic liver transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome is, however, less favorable than it is for other indications (11).

Researchers in several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the TIPS created by using bare stents in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome in terms of improvement in hepatic function and reduction of symptoms. Because of the high rates of stenosis or occlusion and the need for repeated revisions, however, TIPS creation with bare stents is considered best suited as a bridge to orthotopic liver transplantation (5,6,1214).

The use of expanded PTFE-covered Viatorr stent-grafts for TIPS creation in patients with ascites and/or variceal bleeding has been amply described, with a reported 1-year primary patency rate of 80%–84% (7,15,16).

The Viatorr stent-graft is a self-expanding high-radial-strength nitinol stent-graft that has a proximal region lined internally by a thin layer of expanded PTFE, which is impermeable to bile, and a distal uncovered region. This stent-graft, originally designed for the treatment of tracheobronchial strictures, is routinely employed for TIPS creation, where the uncovered region placed in the portal system allows normal blood flow at the portal confluence and the covered region placed intrahepatically provides an impermeable interface with the hepatic parenchyma owing to the expanded PTFE lining, which reduces in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (17,18). Moreover, PTFE is the least thrombogenic artificial graft material available. These characteristics of expanded PTFE and the Viatorr stent-graft make this endoprosthesis probably the most suitable stent for TIPS creation, especially in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome where a high risk of in-stent thrombosis exists. The Viatorr stent-graft has been only recently approved for TIPS creation in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration.

To our knowledge, only one study (8) has been reported in the literature in which the incidence of TIPS dysfunction and outcome in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome who underwent TIPS creation with bare and expanded PTFE-covered stents were analyzed and compared. That study showed a substantial benefit of the use of expanded PTFE-covered stents compared with bare stents for TIPS creation in the treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome in 25 patients. The authors reported a 1-year primary patency rate of 19% for TIPS with bare stents and 67% for that with expanded PTFE-covered stents. In that series of patients, a lower TIPS dysfunction rate with the need for fewer revisions was observed for expanded PTFE-covered stents (8).

In patients with clinically manifest Budd-Chiari syndrome who were treated with expanded PTFE-covered Viatorr stent-grafts compared with patients who were treated with Wallstents, there was a significant increase in the primary patency rate (100% and 85.7% vs 16.7% and 0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively; P < .001), a decrease in the reintervention rate (0.29 ± 0.49 vs 6.17 ± 1.72, P < .001), and a more persistent and significantly greater improvement in hepatic function. Revision of a TIPS, which was originally created with a bare stent, by using an expanded PTFE-covered stent resulted in a drastic reduction in the number of further revisions required and a substantial increase in patency.

In our series of patients, TIPS creation was not performed by using the stump of the occluded hepatic vein. In our experience, the transcaval approach in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome is technically more feasible. As a matter of fact, in Budd-Chiari syndrome, the liver is enlarged and the intrahepatic portion of the inferior vena cava is surrounded by liver parenchyma, and this condition provides stability to the transcaval puncture. Furthermore, in Budd-Chiari syndrome, liver parenchyma is soft, which is different from its condition in cirrhosis, and this advantage helps to make the transcaval puncture straightforward.

Although in our series of patients the direct transcaval approach was selected merely because it was considered safe and more feasible, and not because it was thought to improve TIPS patency, there are some indications that this approach might actually affect the latter favorably. As a matter of fact, dysfunction of TIPS created by using Viatorr stent-grafts with direct puncture of a portal vein from a suprahepatic vein frequently results from hepatic vein stenosis above the graft portion of the endoprosthesis (19). The direct transcaval approach, with coverage of the entire intrahepatic tract from the portal vein to the inferior vena cava, prevents this complication. Use of this approach for TIPS created by using expanded PTFE-covered stents may be one of the reasons for the higher patency rates (85.7% vs 67% at 1 year) and the lower number of revisions (0.29 ± 0.49 vs 0.6 ± 0.9; mean follow-up, 19.1 and 23.1 months) observed in our series of patients compared with the data in the only previously reported series of patients (8). Use of TIPS with expanded PTFE-covered endoprostheses also resulted in a marked clinical improvement.

The major limitations of our study were that it was a single-center study and it included a relatively small patient population. Longer follow-up periods are required for complete secondary patency data.

Our results suggest that expanded PTFE-covered stents can be considered for use with TIPS creation in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome that is refractory to medical therapy. Although larger series of patients with longer follow-up periods are necessary, our preliminary data suggest that TIPS creation by using expanded PTFE-covered stent-grafts in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome may result in a persistent clinical improvement in the long term, thus delaying orthotopic liver transplantation.


    ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 


    FOOTNOTES
 

Abbreviations: PTFE = polytetrafluoroethylene • TIPS = transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Authors stated no financial relationship to disclose.

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, R.G., G.S.; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all authors; manuscript final version approval, all authors; literature research, all authors; clinical studies, all authors; statistical analysis, D.K., G.S.; and manuscript editing, all authors


    References
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 

  1. McCuskey RS. Morphological mechanisms for regulating blood flow through hepatic sinusoids. Liver 2000;20:3–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Menon KV, Shah V, Kamath PS. The Budd-Chiari syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004;350:578–585.[Free Full Text]
  3. Peltzer MY, Ring EJ, LaBerge JM. Treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993;4:263–267.[Medline]
  4. Ochs, A, Sellinger M, Haag K, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome. J Hepatol 1993;18:217–225.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Attwell A, Ludkowski M, Nash R, Kugelmas M. Treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome in a liver transplant unit, the role of transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt and liver transplantation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:867–873.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ganger DR, Klapman JB, McDonald V, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:603–608.[Medline]
  7. Rossi P, Salvatori FM, Fanelli F, et al. Polytetrafluoroethylene-covered nitinol stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: 3-year experience. Radiology 2004;231:820–830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hernandez-Guerra M, Turnes J, Olliff S. PTFE-covered stents improve TIPS patency in Budd-Chiari syndrome. Hepatology 2004;40:1197–1202.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Xu PQ, Ma XX, Ye XX, et al. Surgical treatment of 1360 cases of Budd-Chiari syndrome: 20-year experience. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2004;3:391–394.[Medline]
  10. Orloff MJ, Daily PO, Orloff SL, Girard B, Orloff MS. A 27-year experience with surgical treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome. Ann Surg 2000;232:340–352.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Ruckert JC, Ruckert RI, Rudolph B, Muller JM. Recurrence of the Budd-Chiari syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:867–871.[Medline]
  12. Rossle M, Haag K, Blum HE. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt: a review of the literature and own experiences. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996;11:293–298.[Medline]
  13. Perello A, Garcia Pagan JC, Gilabert R. TIPS is a useful long-term derivative therapy for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome uncontrolled by medical therapy. Hepatology 2002;35:132–139.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Mancuso A, Fung K, Mela M. TIPS for acute and chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome: a single centre experience. J Hepatol 2003;38:751–754.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Hausegger KA, Karnel F, Georgieva B, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation with the Viatorr expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15:239–248.[Medline]
  16. Charon JP, Alaeddin FH, Pimpalwar SA, et al. Results of a retrospective multicenter trial of the Viatorr expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15:1219–1230.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Nishimine K, Saxon RR, Kichikawa K, et al. Improved transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt patency with ePTFE-covered stent-grafts: experimental results in swine. Radiology 1995;196:341–347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Haskal ZJ. Improved patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in humans: creation and revision with PTFE stent-grafts. Radiology 1999;213:759–766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cejna M, Peck-Radosavljvic M, Thurnher SA. Creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with stent-grafts: initial experience with a poly-tetrafluoroethylene-covered nitinol endoprosthesis. Radiology 2001;221:437–446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Boyvat, A. Harman, U. Ozyer, C. Aytekin, and Z. Arat
Percutaneous Sonographic Guidance for TIPS in Budd-Chiari Syndrome: Direct Simultaneous Puncture of the Portal Vein and Inferior Vena Cava
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 560 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Hoppe, S. L. Wang, and B. D. Petersen
Intravascular US-guided Direct Intrahepatic Portocaval Shunt with an Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene-covered Stent-Graft
Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 306 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2411050347v1
241/1/298    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gandini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Simonetti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gandini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Simonetti, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE