|
|
||||||||
Letters to the Editor |
* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259
e-mail: mookadam.farouk{at}mayo.edu
We are writing to correct a letter to the editor (1) that appeared 6 years ago in your prestigious journal (in the January 1999 issue).
We discovered this letter during a recent literature search of MEDLINE while preparing an article on anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. During the MEDLINE search, we discovered the following information:
1. Anomalous pulmonary venous drainage was first described in 1836 by Cooper (2) and Chassinat (3). They individually described single cases of rare congenital malformations that included venous drainage below the diaphragm. The term "scimitar" did not appear in their reports.
2. The next description of this anomaly was in a report by Park (4) in 1912, in which the author described three cases of infants with anomalous pulmonary drainage at autopsy. Again, the word "scimitar" did not appear in this report.
3. In 1949, Dotter et al (5), who were also the first to use angiocardiography and cardiac catheterization to diagnose this anomaly in life, published a report where the scimitar sign was first described radiographically.
4. The first authors to use the term "scimitar" were Halasz et al (6) in 1956.
5. Finally, in 1960, Neill et al (7) were the first to describe the familial occurrence and clinical spectrum of the condition and name it the scimitar syndrome.
As can be seen from this chronology, Neill et al deserve credit for naming the scimitar syndrome, and Halasz et al should be credited for the first use of the eponym "scimitar," while the radiologists, as illustrated by Dotter et al, should be given credit for describing the scimitar sign.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland Medical System, N2W78, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201-1595
e-mail: mmulligan{at}umm.edu
I thank the authors for adding one more piece of information (point 3 in their letter) to the other facts regarding scimitar syndrome that I presented in my previous letter to the editor (1) and that are available in the book Classic Radiologic Signs (2).
As a radiologist, I would like to see Dr Dotter and colleagues claim "another one for the radiologists," but their wording is consistent throughout their report (3) and describes the pulmonary venous anomaly as a "crescent-like" shadow. Since they do not use the word "scimitar" in their report of two angiographic cases, I would think it inappropriate to say that they were the first to describe the scimitar sign. They certainly seem to have been the first ones to report the angiographic findings in live patients and deserve credit for that. Halasz et al (4), despite being nonradiologists, continue to get my vote as the first to use the word "scimitar" in print in reference to this condition.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |