Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413031669
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Church, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Church, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, L. H.
(Radiology 2006;241:939-942.)
© RSNA, 2006


Diagnosis Please

Case 103: PHACE Syndrome1

Daniel G. Church, MD and Lisa H. Lowe, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, St Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO 64111. Received October 14, 2003; revision requested January 8, 2004; final revision received June 21; final version accepted July 2.

Address correspondence to D.G.C. (e-mail: Danielgenechurch{at}yahoo.com).


    HISTORY
 TOP
 HISTORY
 IMAGING FINDINGS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
A 10-month-old girl had an enlarging, warm, reddish left periorbital cutaneous and subcutaneous mass since infancy. Her medical history was otherwise unremarkable. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain was performed.


    IMAGING FINDINGS
 TOP
 HISTORY
 IMAGING FINDINGS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Gadopentetate dimeglumine–enhanced (Magnevist; Berlex, Montville, NJ) T1-weighted fat-suppressed coronal MR imaging of the orbits revealed an enhancing left orbital and periorbital mass with retrobulbar extension that grew around the orbital structures (Fig 1). The left superior ophthalmic vein was mildly enlarged, likely in relation to the increased blood flow from the hemangioma. Transverse T2-weighted MR imaging (Fig 2a) and MR angiography (Fig 2b) revealed a markedly tortuous petrous and cavernous right internal carotid artery and cerebellar hypoplasia (Fig 3). There was resultant ex vacuo dilatation of the fourth ventricle and cisterna magna.


Figure 1
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a: (a, b) Contiguous coronal T1-weighted gadopentetate dimeglumine–enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 634/15) MR images of the orbits show an enhancing left orbital and periorbital hemangioma (arrows) with retrobulbar extension that grew around the orbital structures. Note the enlarged left superior ophthalmic vein (arrowhead).

 

Figure 1
View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b: (a, b) Contiguous coronal T1-weighted gadopentetate dimeglumine–enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 634/15) MR images of the orbits show an enhancing left orbital and periorbital hemangioma (arrows) with retrobulbar extension that grew around the orbital structures. Note the enlarged left superior ophthalmic vein (arrowhead).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a: (a) Transverse fast spin-echo T2-weighted (4330/113) MR image and (b) right posterior oblique three-dimensional time-of-flight gradient-recalled-echo (36/5) MR angiogram of the circle of Willis show a markedly tortuous petrous and cavernous right internal carotid artery (arrow). Questionable tortuosity of the left internal carotid artery is projectional because of overlapping vessels in b.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b: (a) Transverse fast spin-echo T2-weighted (4330/113) MR image and (b) right posterior oblique three-dimensional time-of-flight gradient-recalled-echo (36/5) MR angiogram of the circle of Willis show a markedly tortuous petrous and cavernous right internal carotid artery (arrow). Questionable tortuosity of the left internal carotid artery is projectional because of overlapping vessels in b.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3: Transverse fast spin-echo T2-weighted (4410/101) MR image of the posterior fossa shows cerebellar hypoplasia is greater in the left hemisphere (arrow) than in the right hemisphere, with associated ex vacuo dilatation of the fourth ventricle and cisterna magna.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 HISTORY
 IMAGING FINDINGS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
In this case, the constellation of imaging findings (a T2-weighted bright lesion with brisk enhancement and internal flow voids that grew between structures) and the patient's clinical history were consistent with a diagnosis of hemangioma. Rather than invade the orbital structures, the markedly enhancing mass grew between them.

Hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors in infants, occurring in up to 10% of children younger than 1 year (1). Hemangiomas occur most commonly in white children, girls, and premature infants, and the average age at presentation is 9.8 months (age range, 0–3 years) (2,3). In the biological classification system of vascular anomalies proposed by Mulliken and Glowacki (4), hemangiomas are tumors that consist of proliferative endothelial cells as opposed to vascular malformations (such as arteriovenous fistulas), arteriovenous malformations, capillary and venous malformations, or lymphatic malformations (2). They have a predictable clinical course that includes rapid growth in the 1st year of life (proliferative phase) followed by regression from 1 to 7 years of age (involuting phase) (5).

The MR imaging appearance of hemangiomas is dependent on the evolutionary phase (6). Proliferative lesions are well-defined, lobulated, intensely enhancing soft-tissue masses that are isointense to muscle on T1-weighted images, are hyperintense to muscle on T2-weighted images, and contain internal flow voids. Gradual replacement by fat occurs during the involuting phase (6).

Since hemangiomas will resolve spontaneously if given adequate time, treatment is not usually required unless patients are suspected of having complicating features (airway compromise, skin necrosis, or superinfection) that are commonly associated with large facial lesions.

PHACE syndrome is commonly described in the dermatology literature. This acronym denotes the features most commonly associated with this neurocutaneous syndrome, which are as follows: posterior fossa malformations, hemangiomas, arterial anomalies, coarctation of the aorta and cardiac defects, and eye abnormalities (1). Sternal clefting, which is a less common anomaly, may also occur; in this case, the acronym PHACES has been used to describe the condition (7).

Metry et al (3) reviewed 14 cases of hemangioma and PHACE syndrome and an additional 116 cases in the literature and found the V1 segment of the fifth cranial nerve was the most commonly affected dermatome. Associated structural brain anomalies included Dandy-Walker malformation (most common) and hypoplasia or agenesis of the corpus callosum and cerebellum (Fig 3). Described arterial anomalies include cerebral aneurysm, intracranial internal carotid artery and central branch stenoses, anomalous branches of the internal carotid artery, persistence of primitive embryonic channels (eg, persistent trigeminal artery), and hypoplasia or absence of main channels (carotid and vertebral). Anomalous branches of the internal carotid artery were found more frequently than were intracranial aneurysms (3). Cardiac and aortic anomalies included ventricular septal defects, patent ductus arteriosus, and aortic coarctation. Coarctation of the aorta was the most common cardiac and aortic anomaly (3). Optical findings included increased retinal vascularity, bilateral retinal hyperemia, and Horner syndrome (3). The trigeminal dermatome pattern of hemangioma involvement may be mistaken for a capillary malformation (port-wine stain), thus leading to the clinical misdiagnosis of Sturge-Weber syndrome (3). A distinguishing feature of Sturge-Weber syndrome is the primary central nervous system abnormality of leptomeningeal vascular malformation, which is commonly referred to as leptomeningeal angiomatosis (1).

The differential diagnosis of hemangioma on MR images includes lymphatic malformation, venous malformation, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Lymphatic malformation can be distinguished by finding cystic spaces with rim enhancement (2). Venous malformation has many of the same imaging characteristics as hemangioma (isointense to muscle on T1-weighted images, hyperintense to muscle on T2-weighted images, and diffuse or inhomogeneous enhancement), and it can be difficult to differentiate one from the other (2). However, differentiation is made easier by the fact that venous malformation and hemangioma have a different time course and age of presentation. Venous anomalies are present at birth, but they are not always evident (5). Venous malformations grow in proportion to the child, expand slowly, and often enlarge during puberty (5).

Rhabdomyosarcoma typically has an aggressive appearance, with destructive invasion of the orbital structures. The differential diagnosis for tortuous ectatic internal carotid artery includes arteriovenous malformation with or without aneurysms. Arteriovenous malformation should have a nidus of abnormal feeding arteries and draining veins. The differential diagnosis for cerebellar hypoplasia includes Dandy-Walker malformation, arachnoid cyst, mega cisterna magna, and prior ischemic injury. The Dandy-Walker malformation consists of partial or complete absence of the vermis; dilatation of the fourth ventricle, which communicates posteriorly with a retrocerebellar cyst; enlargement of the posterior fossa; hydrocephalus; and torcular-lambdoid inversion. A retrocerebellar arachnoid cyst causes a mass effect on the cerebellum, which was not seen in our patient. Prior ischemic injury could result in hemispheric atrophy, but there was no corresponding history of injury in this patient. The constellation of findings and clinical history in this case are consistent with a diagnosis of PHACE syndrome. Metry et al (3) emphasized that PHACE syndrome represents a spectrum of anomalies, with 70% of children having only one extracutaneous manifestation. The infant in this case had cerebellar hypoplasia, a cerebral artery anomaly, and orbital and periorbital hemangioma.

Burrows et al (8) recognized progressive arterial occlusion and cerebral infarction in five of eight patients with cervicofacial hemangioma and intracranial vascular anomalies. Neurologic symptoms included seizures, hemiparesis, and motor delay (8). The cause of arterial occlusion is not known, but its presence could affect future preventative treatment. In a similar series, Luo et al (9) observed neurologic deficits in four of eight patients with PHACE syndrome and argued that patients with aneurysms should be observed closely and evaluated with three-dimensional computed tomograpic angiography (9). Because some patients may develop progressive arterial occlusive disease, cerebral infarction, and aneurysm with subsequent rupture, radiologists must be aware of PHACE syndrome and carefully search for additional brain anomalies in patients referred for CT and MR imaging of facial hemangiomas. The radiologist may be the first physician to suggest a diagnosis of PHACE syndrome to family physicians and pediatricians who may be less acquainted with this syndrome.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Part one of this case appeared 4 months previously and may contain larger images.

 


    References
 TOP
 HISTORY
 IMAGING FINDINGS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Frieden IJ, Reese V, Cohen D. PHACE syndrome: the association of posterior fossa brain malformations, hemangiomas, arterial anomalies, coarctation of the aorta and cardiac defects, and eye abnormalities. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:307–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Burrows PE, Laor T, Paltiel H, Robertson RL. Diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of vascular birthmarks. Dermatol Clin 1998;16(3):455–488.
  3. Metry DW, Dowd CF, Barkovich AJ, Frieden IJ. The many faces of PHACE syndrome. J Pediatr 2001;139:117–123.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Hamangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;69:412–420.[Medline]
  5. Mulliken JB, Fishman SJ, Burrows PE. Vascular anomalies. Curr Probl Surg 2000;37:517–584.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Robertson RL, Robson CD, Barnes PD, Burrows PE. Head and neck vascular anomalies of childhood. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1999;9:115–132.[Medline]
  7. Slavotinek AM, Dubovsky E, Dietz HC, Lacbawan F. Report of a child with aortic aneurysm, orofacial clefting, hemangioma, upper sternal defect, and marfanoid features: possible PHACE syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2002;110:283–288.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Burrows PE, Robertson RL, Mulliken JB, et al. Cerebral vasculopathy and neurologic sequelae in infants with cervicofacial hemangioma: report of eight patients. Radiology 1998;207:601–607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Luo CB, Lasjaunias P, Teng MM, Chang FC, Lirng JF, Chang CY. Cervico-cerebrovascular anomalies in children with PHACE syndrome. J Formos Med Assoc 2003;102:379–386.[Medline]
Congratulations to the 150 individuals and four resident groups that submitted the most likely diagnosis (PHACE syndrome) for Diagnosis Please, Case 103. The names and locations of the individuals and resident groups, as submitted, are as follows:

Individual responses

Hisashi Abe, MD, Osaka, Japan
Gholamali Afshang, MD, Tinley Park, Ill
Dr Erhan Akpinar, Ankara, Turkey
Canan Altay, MD, Balcova, Izmir, Turkey
Albert J. Alter, Madison, Wis
Arangasamy Anbarasu, MD, Coventry, United Kingdom
Rajeev Anugu, MD, Bryn Mawr, Pa
Asim Kumar Bag, MBBS, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Aaron Scott Bailey, MD, San Antonio, Tex
Ken Baliga, Rockford, Ill
Gregory J. Balmforth, MD, Tucson, Ariz
Fabrice Basseau, Tarbes, France
Michael Lewis Black, MD, Irvine, Calif
Susan I. Blaser, MD, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Eric L. Bressler, MD, Minnetonka, Minn
Daniel F. Broderick, MD, Jacksonville, Fla
Douglas C. Brown, MD, Virginia Beach, Va
Dr Marcelo F. Cabrini, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Carlos Capiel, Jr, MD, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Luisa F. Cervantes, Miami, Fla
Kam Wai Chan, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Anísio F. Chaves, Maceio, Brazil
Govind Chavhan, MD, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Natesan Chidambaranathan, MD, Chennai, India
Haris Chrysikopoulos, MD, Kerkyra, Greece
Ming-Tsung Chuang, MD, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Neal R. Conti, MD, Seattle, Wash
Yves-Sebastien Cordoliani, MD, Paris, France
Marco Antonio Cura, MD, San Antonio, Tex
Marc G. de Baets, MD, Lugano, Switzerland
Peter C. De Baets, MD, Damme, Belgium
J. F. K. de Villiers, Gisborne, New Zealand
Jon James De Witte, Bishop, Ga
Mustafa Kemal Demir, MD, Ataköy, Istanbul, Turkey
Thaworn Dendumrongsup, MD, Hat Yai, Songkla, Thailand
Luiz Carlos Donoso Scoppetta, MD, São Paulo, Brazil
Seyed Emamian, MD, PhD, Rockville, Md
Juliet H. Fallah, MD, Chicago, Ill
Shella Farooki, MD, Dublin, Ohio
Gabriel C. Fernéndez, Vigo, Spain
Francis Flaherty, MD, Ridgefield, Conn
Thiago Junqueira Franco, São Paulo, Brazil
Akira Fujikawa, Tokyo, Japan
Rajneesh Galwa, Jaipur, India
Ram Prakash Galwa, Chandigarh, India
Karthik Ganesan, Mumbai, India
Douglas Joseph Gardner, MD, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
William Gawman, MD, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Gilles Genin, MD, Annecy, France
Mark G. Goldshein, MD, Andover, Mass
Francisco Jose Gonzalez, MD, Cantabria, Spain
Dan G. Gridley, MD, Phoenix, Ariz
Flavius Guglielmo, MD, Basking Ridge, NJ
Ferris M. Hall, MD, Boston, Mass
Clare M. Hartigan, MBBCh, Dublin, Ireland
Andreas Harzheim, MD, Cologne, Germany
Rufus Womack Head, MD, North Bridgton, Me
Yuusuke Hirokawa, MD, Kyoto, Japan
Helen T. Ho, MD, Chicago, Ill
Ronald J. Homer, MD, Weston, Conn
Alberto Iaia, MD, Wilmington, Del
Rajapandian Ilangovan, MD, FRCR, London, United Kingdom
Kiriakos Kalampoukas, MD, Athens, Greece
Shinichi Kan, MD, Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Katsuhiko Kato, MD, PhD, Nagoya, Japan
Nurettin Katranci, MD, Antalya, Turkey
Steven A. Klein, MD, Shrewsbury, Mass
Mehmet Kocak, MD, Milwaukee, Wis
Stefanos Lachanis, MD, Athens, Greece
Alexis Lacout, MD, Paris, France
Mario Laguna, West Allis, Wis
Dr Martin Lecompte, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
John T. Lim, MD, Newport Coast, Calif
David A. Lisle, Brisbane, Australia
Patricia Lowry, MD, Richmond, Va
Umapathi Mahesh, Sr, MBBS, DMRD, Kerala, India
Naganathan B. S. Mani, MD, Nassau, Bahamas
Franklin Marden, MD, Fairfax, Va
Paulo Mariz Filho, MD, Salvador, Buenos Aires, Brazil
Michael B. Martin, MD, Austin, Tex
Waldir Heringer Maymone, MD, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Frank McKowne, MD, Vancouver, Wash
Rogério Melo, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Nikolaos Michailidis, MD, Thessaloniki, Greece
Mehran Midia, MD, Springfield, Ill
Manabu Minami, MD, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Jose Mondello, MD, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Franklin G. Moser, MD, Los Angeles, Calif
Utaroh Motosugi, MD, Yamanashi, Japan
Bruno M. Moura de Sousa, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Sugoto Mukherjee, MBBS, Charlottesville, Va
Tammam Naim Nehme, MD, East Wenatchee, Wash
Honorio Chiminazzo Neto, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Hiroshi Nobusawa, MD, Tokyo, Japan
Laura Oleaga, MD, Bilbao, Spain
Sanford M. Ornstein, MD, Phoenix, Ariz
Dr Klaus Orth, Aachen, Germany
Carlos Ovejero Vela, MD, Barcelona, Spain
Rajeev Padmanabhan, MBBS, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Neeraj J. Panchal, MD, San Diego, Calif
Harish Panicker, MD, Hermitage, Pa
Narendrakumar P. Patel, MD, Newburgh, NY
Prakash N. Patel, MD, New City, NY
Ernesto Oscar Pearson II, MD, Besan{tau}on, France
Cecilio R. Poyatos, MD, Benimamet, Valencia, Spain
Henry F. W. Pribram, MD, Laguna Beach, Calif
Prashant Raghavan, MD, Charlottesville, Va
Daniel C. Rappaport, MD, FRCPC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Enrique Remartinez Escobar, MD, Melilla, Spain
Matthew C. Rheinboldt, MD, Nashville, Tenn
Elisabeth Rivera Codias, Barcelona, Spain
Mathieu Henri Rodallec, MD, Paris, France
Marcio Bustamante Sa Rodrigues, MD, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Tsutomu Sakamoto, MD, Tokyo, Japan
Hatice Tuba Sanal, MD, Ankara, Turkey
Shilpa S. Sankhe, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
Steven Schepers, MD, Herent, Belgium
Janet Scheraga, Syracuse, NY
Anthony J. Scuderi, Johnstown, Pa
Matt Shapiro, MD, Charlottesville, Va
Hideki Shima, MD, Tokyo, Japan
Taro Shimono, MD, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
Ken Simmons, Sydney, Australia
Annemie Snoeckx, MD, Edegem, Belgium
James D. Sprinkle, Jr, MD, Spotsylvania, Va
Scott David Steenburg, MD, Mount Pleasant, SC
Kouichi Sugiyama, Numazu, Japan
Vinod Sukumaran II, MD, Trivandrum, India
Venkateswar Rao Surabhi, MBBS, Herndon, Va
Norio Takahashi, MD, Fukui, Japan
Eliko Tanaka, MD, Yokohama, Japan
Sidhartha Tavri, Mumbai, India
Douglas L. Teich, MD, Brookline, Mass
Eugene Tong, MD, Austin, Tex
William C. Torreggiani, MB, Dublin, Ireland
Dr Özgür Tosun, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey
Hiroyuki Ueda, MD, Kyoto, Japan
Shigeaki Umeoka, MD, Wakayama, Japan
Eleni Vafeiadou, Thessaloniki, Greece
Piet Vanhoenacker, MD, Moorsel, Belgium
Joan C. Vilanova, MD, Girona, Spain
Christopher P. Vittore, MD, Rockford, Ill
Jesús Ig. Vivancos, MD, Tenerife, Spain
Ivan Vollmer, MD, Barcelona, Spain
Dr Silvio Vollmer, Cipolleti, Rio Negro, Argentina
Nikolaos Vougiouklis, Kalamaria, Greece
Edward Williams, Isle of Man, United Kingdom
Kenneth Dean Williams, MD, San Antonio, Tex
Joe Yut, Olathe, Kan
Yu Zhang, San Francisco, Calif

Resident group response

Trakya University School of Medicine Radiology Residents, Edirne, Turkey
Kyoto City Hospital Radiology Residents, Kyoto, Japan
Maine Medical Center Radiology Residents, Portland, Me
University of Pennsylvania Radiology Residents, Philadelphia, Pa




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. L. Heyer, M. M. Dowling, D. J. Licht, S. K.-H. Tay, K. Morel, M. C. Garzon, and P. Meyers
The Cerebral Vasculopathy of PHACES Syndrome
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 308 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
W. R. K. Smoker, L. R. Gentry, N. K. Yee, D. L. Reede, and J. A. Nerad
Vascular Lesions of the Orbit: More than Meets the Eye
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 185 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Church, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Church, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, L. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE